Re: Heads-up: RPM 4.8.0-beta1 about to hit rawhide
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 03:32:59PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: > - The new version has integrated support for extracting OCaml > dependencies, this clashes with the existing ocaml-dependency > extraction mechanism in Fedora. Notably rpm-build conflicts with current > ocaml-runtime, and the ocaml build-macros need updating to let the > integrated pieces do their work. Ah, that answers the question I was about to ask :-) I'll rebuild the OCaml base package to cope with this. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Heads-up: RPM 4.8.0-beta1 about to hit rawhide
I'm tracking this in this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545116 Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many languages. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/libguestfs/ See what it can do: http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/libguestfs/recipes.html -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Heads-up: RPM 4.8.0-beta1 about to hit rawhide
2009/12/7 Panu Matilainen : > > Now that FESCo has approved new major RPM version for F-13 and the public > beta is officially out... it's going to hit rawhide in a few hours. > I remember hearing a rumour about automagic OSGi dependency resolution... Is that something that's likely to appear in the near future? -- Mat Booth -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Heads-up: RPM 4.8.0-beta1 about to hit rawhide
On 12/08/2009 03:59 AM, Mat Booth wrote: > 2009/12/7 Panu Matilainen >> >> Now that FESCo has approved new major RPM version for F-13 and the public >> beta is officially out... it's going to hit rawhide in a few hours. >> > > > I remember hearing a rumour about automagic OSGi dependency > resolution... Is that something that's likely to appear in the near > future? http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.8.0 mentions it. Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Heads-up: RPM 4.8.0-beta1 about to hit rawhide
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Mat Booth wrote: 2009/12/7 Panu Matilainen : Now that FESCo has approved new major RPM version for F-13 and the public beta is officially out... it's going to hit rawhide in a few hours. I remember hearing a rumour about automagic OSGi dependency resolution... Is that something that's likely to appear in the near future? You're probably thinking of this: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/OSGiAutoDeps Rpm has carried the OSGi dep extractor script for couple of years now, but it doesn't get run automatically. - Panu - -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Heads-up: RPM 4.8.0-beta1 about to hit rawhide
2009/12/8 Panu Matilainen : > On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Mat Booth wrote: > >> 2009/12/7 Panu Matilainen : >>> >>> Now that FESCo has approved new major RPM version for F-13 and the public >>> beta is officially out... it's going to hit rawhide in a few hours. >>> >> >> >> I remember hearing a rumour about automagic OSGi dependency >> resolution... Is that something that's likely to appear in the near >> future? > > You're probably thinking of this: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/OSGiAutoDeps > Yes, that must be where I saw it. > Rpm has carried the OSGi dep extractor script for couple of years now, but > it doesn't get run automatically. > Is it not reliable enough? -- Mat Booth -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Heads-up: RPM 4.8.0-beta1 about to hit rawhide
> 2009/12/8 Panu Matilainen : > > On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Mat Booth wrote: > >> 2009/12/7 Panu Matilainen : > >>> Now that FESCo has approved new major RPM version for F-13 and the > >>> public beta is officially out... it's going to hit rawhide in a few > >>> hours. > >> > >> I remember hearing a rumour about automagic OSGi dependency > >> resolution... Is that something that's likely to appear in the near > >> future? > > > > You're probably thinking of this: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/OSGiAutoDeps > > Yes, that must be where I saw it. > > > Rpm has carried the OSGi dep extractor script for couple of years now, > > but it doesn't get run automatically. > > Is it not reliable enough? > Hi Mat, Look at bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488352 . I think that some of the packages that need applying patches are yours :) so you can speed up the process a bit. Hopefully once we verify it is good enough for several Eclipse plugins it can be enabled by default. Regards, Alex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Heads-up: RPM 4.8.0-beta1 about to hit rawhide
2009/12/8 Alexander Kurtakov : >> 2009/12/8 Panu Matilainen : >> > On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Mat Booth wrote: >> >> 2009/12/7 Panu Matilainen : >> >>> Now that FESCo has approved new major RPM version for F-13 and the >> >>> public beta is officially out... it's going to hit rawhide in a few >> >>> hours. >> >> >> >> I remember hearing a rumour about automagic OSGi dependency >> >> resolution... Is that something that's likely to appear in the near >> >> future? >> > >> > You're probably thinking of this: >> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/OSGiAutoDeps >> >> Yes, that must be where I saw it. >> >> > Rpm has carried the OSGi dep extractor script for couple of years now, >> > but it doesn't get run automatically. >> >> Is it not reliable enough? >> > Hi Mat, > Look at bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488352 . I think that > some of the packages that need applying patches are yours :) so you can speed > up the process a bit. Hopefully once we verify it is good enough for several > Eclipse plugins it can be enabled by default. > > Regards, > Alex > Aha, I didn't know about that bug; thanks for the pointer. -- Mat Booth -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
