Re: Push?
Peter Robinson wrote: > hehe, no i wasn't actually :-) I was wanting opal for ekiga :-D As I said, pinging rdieter is the probably most effective method to get override tags, he does most of them (almost all the KDE ones and several non-KDE ones too). (Hopefully he won't get so flooded with override tag requests after this message that he can't handle them anymore. ;-) ) Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Push?
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:34:32PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >>>Is there a different problem with the override tagging then? >> >> Yes. Mostly getting people to do them. > > FYI, you can ping rdieter for override tags. Peter Robinson, if you're > thinking of webkitgtk-1.1.8-1.fc11, SMParrish asked rdieter to tag it on > #fedora-kde, it should be tagged now. hehe, no i wasn't actually :-) I was wanting opal for ekiga :-D Peter -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Push?
Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:34:32PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >>Is there a different problem with the override tagging then? > > Yes. Mostly getting people to do them. FYI, you can ping rdieter for override tags. Peter Robinson, if you're thinking of webkitgtk-1.1.8-1.fc11, SMParrish asked rdieter to tag it on #fedora-kde, it should be tagged now. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Push?
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:34:32PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> As a side note, is this impacting override tagging, as well? (I'm not sure >>> if the two functions are related.) >> >> They're unrelated. > >Is there a different problem with the override tagging then? Yes. Mostly getting people to do them. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Push?
>> As a side note, is this impacting override tagging, as well? (I'm not sure >> if the two functions are related.) > > They're unrelated. Is there a different problem with the override tagging then? Peter -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Push?
Chris Weyl (cw...@alumni.drew.edu) said: > As a side note, is this impacting override tagging, as well? (I'm not sure > if the two functions are related.) They're unrelated. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Push?
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 07:34:00AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > Not to nag, but it's been going on 2 weeks since the last push. I > > *Sigh* > As a side note, is this impacting override tagging, as well? (I'm not sure if the two functions are related.) -Chris -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Push?
Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 07:34:00AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: Not to nag, but it's been going on 2 weeks since the last push. I *Sigh* assume this is GA-related, which is fine, just curious. I saw some Bodhi mail for my updates which made me think one was impending, but haven't seen anything yet. Hoping the next push will resolve the That's because it keeps dying for various reasons and I have to go fix it up manually. dependency issues around yum upgrades to F-11. :) Next few days, maybe? No hurry, just looking for a rough ETA if one exists. A push has been running since about noon yesterday. I refuse to give an ETA since I have no idea how often it is going to die still. It's mashed: f9-updates-testing f10-updates-testing f11-updates f11-updates-testing It's working on f10-updates. That leaves f9-updates. josh Many thanks! -- in your fear, speak only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Push?
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 07:34:00AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > Not to nag, but it's been going on 2 weeks since the last push. I *Sigh* > assume this is GA-related, which is fine, just curious. I saw some > Bodhi mail for my updates which made me think one was impending, but > haven't seen anything yet. Hoping the next push will resolve the That's because it keeps dying for various reasons and I have to go fix it up manually. > dependency issues around yum upgrades to F-11. :) > > Next few days, maybe? No hurry, just looking for a rough ETA if one exists. A push has been running since about noon yesterday. I refuse to give an ETA since I have no idea how often it is going to die still. It's mashed: f9-updates-testing f10-updates-testing f11-updates f11-updates-testing It's working on f10-updates. That leaves f9-updates. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
