Re: Thunderbird 3.0pre?

2009-09-30 Thread Warren Togami

On 09/30/2009 05:28 AM, drago01 wrote:

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 4:15 AM, Mail Listsli...@sapience.com  wrote:

On 09/29/2009 11:20 AM, Christopher Aillon wrote:



Tweaking the following pref: mailnews.database.global.indexer.enabled =
false

Should work around the problem for now.



  Is that any different than turning it off in
Preferences-General-Enable Global Search and Indexer

  ?


no


In my experience the indexer isn't what causes the 100% CPU lockups. 
Synchronization of each folder seems to be the cause.  If I turn off 
synchronization in Properties of all folders the 100% CPU lockups seem 
to go away entirely for me.


Right-click on each folder, Properties, Synchronization, uncheck Select 
this folder for offline use.


The indexer is annoying and I turned it off because after crunching away 
for hours it had indexed only 5% of my mail.


Warren Togami
wtog...@redhat.com

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Thunderbird 3.0pre?

2009-09-30 Thread Ola Thoresen
Just to make things even more confusing, I have no problems with 
thunderbird-3.0-3.8.b3.fc12.x86_64.rpm


I have a setup with
- Multiple IMAP accounts
- Some _huge_ folders (  300 000 messages)
- More than 11 GB of mail in one account,  9 GB in another

The recent upgrade to thunderbird-3.0-3.9.b4.fc12.x86_64 made the 
computer almost unusable, (same as thunderbird-3.0-1.beta2.fc11.x86_64 
did back in march/april).


So something was fixed in b3, that is broken in b4 again - at least for me.



Rgds.

Ola Thoresen

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Thunderbird 3.0pre?

2009-09-29 Thread Matej Cepl
Mail Lists, Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:23:11 -0400:
 You might want to delete your .thunderbird directory and try again.
 
  Im happy for you. For what its worth, I have several accounts too - not
 just many mail folders.

My experience is that it is better to run IMAP server on localhost and 
store all messages there ... emails are too valuable thing to be given to 
pre-release code. Anyway ...

  It did not work for me - whilst the vanilla 3.0pre version works fine -
 witrhout deleting anything.

I would love to see a bug report for this with a backtrace of thunderbird 
when it is in 100% CPU state. So, please:

1) install all -debuginfo packages (debuginfo-install thunderbird is your 
friend),
2) start TB,
3) open gnome-terminal (or whatever terminal emulator you use in X) and 
when TB goes to 100% CPU, you will have hopefully at least enough juice 
to Alt+TAB to the terminal and run

gdb --pid=$(/sbin/pidof thunderbird-bin)

(you can have it prepared on the command line, so you just run Alt+TAB 
and Enter)

4) when you finally get gdb prompt, run command

thread apply all backtrace

5) you get many screens of stuff, please, copy it into a new bug report 
against Thunderbird component on bugzilla.redhat.com.

Thank you,

Matěj

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Thunderbird 3.0pre?

2009-09-29 Thread Christopher Aillon

On 09/27/2009 08:15 AM, Mail Lists wrote:

On 09/27/2009 11:02 AM, drago01 wrote:

On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 5:00 PM, mike cloakedmike.cloa...@gmail.com  wrote:

Is there any chance there will be a build of Thunderbird 3.0PRE in
Koji soon? It would be nice to see a build for F11 and F12 as I
believe there are significant fixes compared to 3.0beta 4 in the
3.0pre build.


like?



   I do know that the 64 bit fedora beta 4 (there is no 64 bit
mozilla.org as, last I read a while ago, they are not comfortable the
code is 64 bit clean) had terrible problems from beta 4 (tho beta 3  was
fine).

   I switched to 32 bit mozilla.org 3.0pre (on x64 install of f11) and
the problems went away.

   The beta 4 (from updates-testing) started the indexing thing - and
then it took 100% cpu and memory growth went to 3.5 GiB - after a period
memory use fell to 200 MiB, cpu declined .. then it repeated this cycle
several times .. i left this for 6 hours - eventually tb locked up and
left a dirty screen image - stuck - cpu usage went to 0 for TB. I had to
hand kill it.

   Installing the stock mozilla 386 build has no such problems.

   I suspect there is some 64 very unclean code underlying the problem.
Tho it could be beta 4 versus pre as well.



Tweaking the following pref: mailnews.database.global.indexer.enabled = 
false


Should work around the problem for now.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Thunderbird 3.0pre?

2009-09-28 Thread 罗星
2009/9/27 drago01 drag...@gmail.com

 On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com
 wrote:
  On 09/27/2009 10:15 AM, Mail Lists wrote:
 
I do know that the 64 bit fedora beta 4 (there is no 64 bit
  mozilla.org as, last I read a while ago, they are not comfortable the
  code is 64 bit clean) had terrible problems from beta 4 (tho beta 3  was
  fine).
 
I switched to 32 bit mozilla.org 3.0pre (on x64 install of f11) and
  the problems went away.
 
The beta 4 (from updates-testing) started the indexing thing - and
  then it took 100% cpu and memory growth went to 3.5 GiB - after a period
  memory use fell to 200 MiB, cpu declined .. then it repeated this cycle
  several times .. i left this for 6 hours - eventually tb locked up and
  left a dirty screen image - stuck - cpu usage went to 0 for TB. I had to
  hand kill it.
 
Installing the stock mozilla 386 build has no such problems.
 
I suspect there is some 64 very unclean code underlying the problem.
  Tho it could be beta 4 versus pre as well
 
  Gee. Here I am messaging you on TB 3.0b4 on a x86_64 machine with TB
 3.0b4
  x86_64 from updates-testing. Your message was in a folder with 1367 other
  email messages. Indexing worked fine. I don't see any spikes in CPU or
  memory usage. No other bugs in b4 at the moment. It's the best version
 yet.
 
  You might want to delete your .thunderbird directory and try again.

 b4 is working fine for me to (x86_64) have not noticed any regressions
 compared to b3.

 --
 fedora-devel-list mailing list
 fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: Thunderbird 3.0pre?

2009-09-27 Thread drago01
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 5:00 PM, mike cloaked mike.cloa...@gmail.com wrote:
 Is there any chance there will be a build of Thunderbird 3.0PRE in
 Koji soon? It would be nice to see a build for F11 and F12 as I
 believe there are significant fixes compared to 3.0beta 4 in the
 3.0pre build.

like?

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Re: Thunderbird 3.0pre?

2009-09-27 Thread mike cloaked
Drag01 wrote

 like?

Well someone I know has had dreadful problems with the x64 version of
b4 build for F11 from updates-testing - with huge memory usage and
never completed the re-indexing process - in the end it hung the
machine completely. He took 3.0pre from the mozilla download site and
it ran fine.

I am told that the x64 code is not clean, and wondered if for x64
users with large numbers of accounts and large amounts of mail stored
that maybe the 3.0pre code may actually work where it did not work for
3.0b4 in the x64 case?

I have just moved from b2 to b4 as b2 gave me signficant problems with
starttls connections to a dovecot imap server but my case was i386.

-- 
mike

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Thunderbird 3.0pre?

2009-09-27 Thread Mail Lists
On 09/27/2009 11:02 AM, drago01 wrote:
 On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 5:00 PM, mike cloaked mike.cloa...@gmail.com wrote:
 Is there any chance there will be a build of Thunderbird 3.0PRE in
 Koji soon? It would be nice to see a build for F11 and F12 as I
 believe there are significant fixes compared to 3.0beta 4 in the
 3.0pre build.
 
 like?
 

  I do know that the 64 bit fedora beta 4 (there is no 64 bit
mozilla.org as, last I read a while ago, they are not comfortable the
code is 64 bit clean) had terrible problems from beta 4 (tho beta 3  was
fine).

  I switched to 32 bit mozilla.org 3.0pre (on x64 install of f11) and
the problems went away.

  The beta 4 (from updates-testing) started the indexing thing - and
then it took 100% cpu and memory growth went to 3.5 GiB - after a period
memory use fell to 200 MiB, cpu declined .. then it repeated this cycle
several times .. i left this for 6 hours - eventually tb locked up and
left a dirty screen image - stuck - cpu usage went to 0 for TB. I had to
hand kill it.

  Installing the stock mozilla 386 build has no such problems.

  I suspect there is some 64 very unclean code underlying the problem.
Tho it could be beta 4 versus pre as well.

  best,

gene/

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Thunderbird 3.0pre?

2009-09-27 Thread Michael Cronenworth

On 09/27/2009 10:13 AM, mike cloaked wrote:

Well someone I know has had dreadful problems with the x64 version of
b4 build for F11 from updates-testing - with huge memory usage and
never completed the re-indexing process - in the end it hung the
machine completely. He took 3.0pre from the mozilla download site and
it ran fine.

I am told that the x64 code is not clean, and wondered if for x64
users with large numbers of accounts and large amounts of mail stored
that maybe the 3.0pre code may actually work where it did not work for
3.0b4 in the x64 case?

I have just moved from b2 to b4 as b2 gave me signficant problems with
starttls connections to a dovecot imap server but my case was i386.
   


1) x64 is Microsoft's marketing term. Why are you using it?

2) I run F11 x86_64 on two Core 2 machines. TB 3.0b4 on both. Dovecot 
IMAP with STARTTLS enabled. No problems whatsoever. Indexing on folders 
with thousands of e-mails worked fine. I've gone from b2, b3, and b4 
without any problems. I've only seen the nice bug fixes and new features 
come up. I doubt the validity of the claim that your bugs are 64-bit 
only issues.


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Thunderbird 3.0pre?

2009-09-27 Thread Michael Cronenworth

On 09/27/2009 10:15 AM, Mail Lists wrote:

   I do know that the 64 bit fedora beta 4 (there is no 64 bit
mozilla.org as, last I read a while ago, they are not comfortable the
code is 64 bit clean) had terrible problems from beta 4 (tho beta 3  was
fine).

   I switched to 32 bit mozilla.org 3.0pre (on x64 install of f11) and
the problems went away.

   The beta 4 (from updates-testing) started the indexing thing - and
then it took 100% cpu and memory growth went to 3.5 GiB - after a period
memory use fell to 200 MiB, cpu declined .. then it repeated this cycle
several times .. i left this for 6 hours - eventually tb locked up and
left a dirty screen image - stuck - cpu usage went to 0 for TB. I had to
hand kill it.

   Installing the stock mozilla 386 build has no such problems.

   I suspect there is some 64 very unclean code underlying the problem.
Tho it could be beta 4 versus pre as well


Gee. Here I am messaging you on TB 3.0b4 on a x86_64 machine with TB 
3.0b4 x86_64 from updates-testing. Your message was in a folder with 
1367 other email messages. Indexing worked fine. I don't see any spikes 
in CPU or memory usage. No other bugs in b4 at the moment. It's the best 
version yet.


You might want to delete your .thunderbird directory and try again.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Thunderbird 3.0pre?

2009-09-27 Thread Mail Lists
On 09/27/2009 11:21 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:

 Gee. Here I am messaging you on TB 3.0b4 on a x86_64 machine with TB
 3.0b4 x86_64 from updates-testing. Your message was in a folder with
 1367 other email messages. Indexing worked fine. I don't see any spikes
 in CPU or memory usage. No other bugs in b4 at the moment. It's the best
 version yet.
 
 You might want to delete your .thunderbird directory and try again.
 

 Im happy for you. For what its worth, I have several accounts too - not
just many mail folders.

 It did not work for me - whilst the vanilla 3.0pre version works fine -
witrhout deleting anything.

 Thank you for your kind thoughts.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Thunderbird 3.0pre?

2009-09-27 Thread drago01
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
 On 09/27/2009 10:15 AM, Mail Lists wrote:

   I do know that the 64 bit fedora beta 4 (there is no 64 bit
 mozilla.org as, last I read a while ago, they are not comfortable the
 code is 64 bit clean) had terrible problems from beta 4 (tho beta 3  was
 fine).

   I switched to 32 bit mozilla.org 3.0pre (on x64 install of f11) and
 the problems went away.

   The beta 4 (from updates-testing) started the indexing thing - and
 then it took 100% cpu and memory growth went to 3.5 GiB - after a period
 memory use fell to 200 MiB, cpu declined .. then it repeated this cycle
 several times .. i left this for 6 hours - eventually tb locked up and
 left a dirty screen image - stuck - cpu usage went to 0 for TB. I had to
 hand kill it.

   Installing the stock mozilla 386 build has no such problems.

   I suspect there is some 64 very unclean code underlying the problem.
 Tho it could be beta 4 versus pre as well

 Gee. Here I am messaging you on TB 3.0b4 on a x86_64 machine with TB 3.0b4
 x86_64 from updates-testing. Your message was in a folder with 1367 other
 email messages. Indexing worked fine. I don't see any spikes in CPU or
 memory usage. No other bugs in b4 at the moment. It's the best version yet.

 You might want to delete your .thunderbird directory and try again.

b4 is working fine for me to (x86_64) have not noticed any regressions
compared to b3.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list