Review request begs
So I know lots of people submit these sort of begs offering to do reviews in return, but... I'm a wee bit way too tied up to do any reviews in return right now, so I'm asking for reviewers to look at these simply because they're awesome packages we want in the distro... :) rinputd - A server for receiving input events over the network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553705 Neat little daemon that listens for a network connection from something such as the remotux app for iphone/ipod touch, and feeds received data through the linux kernel input subsystem. Basically, remotux turns the touchscreen into a trackpad, complete with tap-to-click, scrolling, etc., and you can pop up the standard keyboard and use it for, well, keyboard input. libcrystalhd - Broadcom Crystal HD device interface library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553717 I just got the driver for these cards merged into the linux kernel staging tree a few days ago. Now we need the device interface library to talk to the thing and add support to apps to use it. This is a hardware h.264, mpeg2 and vc1 decoder board. That's right. 100% free and open-source drivers and libs from Broadcom, and they give us a way to decode digital video on Fedora w/o violating any codec patents, since the decoding is done entirely in hardware (this is pretty similar to the mpeg2 decoder on the Hauppauge WinTV PVR-350 in that respect). Please and thank you, etc., etc. -- Jarod Wilson ja...@redhat.com -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Review request begs
libcrystalhd - Broadcom Crystal HD device interface library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553717 I just got the driver for these cards merged into the linux kernel staging tree a few days ago. Now we need the device interface library to talk to the thing and add support to apps to use it. This is a hardware h.264, mpeg2 and vc1 decoder board. That's right. 100% free and open-source drivers and libs from Broadcom, and they give us a way to decode digital video on Fedora w/o violating any codec patents, since the decoding is done entirely in hardware (this is pretty similar to the mpeg2 decoder on the Hauppauge WinTV PVR-350 in that respect). I'll grab this one because I started looking at packaging it up the other day, so if someone else has done the work I was going to do the least I can do it review it :-) Cheers, Peter -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Review request begs
rinputd - A server for receiving input events over the network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553705 I'm taking this for review, it's just too cool not to... Jarod Wilson ja...@redhat.com -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Package review request - autotest-client - anyone want to trade?
Greetings folks, I'm fishing for a package review for autotest-client (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548522). Autotest-client, as the name suggests, contains the client-side portion of the autotest scheduler currently in use by AutoQA [1]. As is custom, I can offer review for another package needing review. Thanks in advance, James [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AutoQA signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
[Bug 502358] Review Request: mojomojo - Catalyst DBIx::Class powered Wiki
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502358 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||532190 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
Re: review request - rasmol, Molecular Graphics Visualization Tool
On 11/24/2009 10:50 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: But I dunno if there's a policy requirement that you should anyway. FWIW, the policy says: If a package contains a GUI application, then it needs to also include a properly installed .desktop file. For the purposes of these guidelines, a GUI application is defined as any application which draws an X window and runs from within that window. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files So, the rasmol app doesn't meet that criteria, so a .desktop file is not required (although, it is worth noting that it is also permitted if the maintainer wishes to do so). ~spot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Review request - django-lint
Hi everybody, just a few days ago I've made a package django-lint. rpmlint is happy, koji builder too. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540617 I'd be glad, if someone is willing and able to support me, since it's my first packet. Cheers, Matthias -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: review request - rasmol, Molecular Graphics Visualization Tool
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 koji scratch build now works. http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol-2.7.5-5.fc12.src.rpm -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFLEYYNL6j7milTFsERAjTlAJ4i+ubfB9T8nWiVPteR4nbGvSjcrACeLjQX iTLbEyfp7SOUDUxOiuXXkZQ= =zFuk -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: review request - rasmol, Molecular Graphics Visualization Tool
2009/11/29 Carl Byington wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 koji scratch build now works. http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol-2.7.5-5.fc12.src.rpm [..] Cool! Update your review request. -- Rakesh Pandit https://fedoraproject.org/ freedom, friends, features, first -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: review request - rasmol, Molecular Graphics Visualization Tool
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 the short version is that at a minimum you should stick an icon with the same name as the binary, extension / file format .png, in /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps . That did not work for me, but if I put the converted .png icon in /usr/share/icons it works nicely. ...that sounds like you shouldn't ship a menu entry at all, to me. As you say, it would be rather pointless. But I dunno if there's a policy requirement that you should anyway. It turns out to be trivial to have the desktop file launch the program from within a gnome-terminal Terminal=true which does exactly what I want. Updated spec file at http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol.spec incorporating many changes from Terje Rosten. Thanks! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFLDY2XL6j7milTFsERAvl5AJ9SJ8jnJKREKu+4bTb80M10xyDc0ACfSPBx UesByI6zjfSVUkajqSUMU3I= =p/K6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: review request - rasmol, Molecular Graphics Visualization Tool
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 12:04 -0800, Carl Byington wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
the short version is that at a minimum you should stick an icon with
the
same name as the binary, extension / file format .png,
in /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps .
That did not work for me, but if I put the converted .png icon in
/usr/share/icons it works nicely.
That's the 'old' system and really shouldn't be used. What you probably
missed is the bit I missed from my original email - when using the new
system you need to add these snippets:
%post
touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor /dev/null || :
%postun
if [ $1 -eq 0 ] ; then
touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor /dev/null
gtk-update-icon-cache %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor /dev/null || :
fi
%posttrans
gtk-update-icon-cache %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor /dev/null || :
to the spec. Otherwise the icon cache doesn't get updated so the icon
won't be available.
...that sounds like you shouldn't ship a menu entry at all, to me. As
you say, it would be rather pointless. But I dunno if there's a policy
requirement that you should anyway.
It turns out to be trivial to have the desktop file launch the program
from within a gnome-terminal
Terminal=true
which does exactly what I want.
ah, I see. I misunderstood you as suggesting that you need to pipe data
to rasmol at startup to make it useful, obviously that's not the case :)
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: review request - rasmol, Molecular Graphics Visualization Tool
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 12:17 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: That's the 'old' system and really shouldn't be used. What you probably missed is the bit I missed from my original email - when using the new system you need to add these snippets: Thanks! That works nicely. New spec file at: http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol.spec -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFLDbvJL6j7milTFsERAsDTAJ9i1w8aCeQaC1oH3sng27lFl6kdeQCdFq+y WFaVS7FIu8jFXnO864vaSpc= =TrHD -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
review request - rasmol, Molecular Graphics Visualization Tool
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have built a spec file for rasmol 2.7.5 http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol.spec based on an earlier one from Mandrake. It now builds and seems to run on Fedora 12. This spec file clearly needs some changes: 1) There were some menu icon references to files that are no longer in the package, but there is a rasmol_48x48.xpm image. What is the preferred mechanism to create menu icons, where do they go, etc? 2) There does not seem to be much point in creating gui icons for this, since it seems to be intended to run from a command prompt in a terminal. The program uses stdin to read commands, and the data is then displayed in a graphic window. Unless there is an easy way to create an icon that launches a gnome-terminal which in turn runs the rasmol binary, and allows the user to then type commands into that terminal session. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFLDGbGL6j7milTFsERAlgeAJ99F85DAWZybSDcVbTHpyZy7qphXwCffpzX +Ogall1p4R3O8rp2fLk24ZU= =ZDPj -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: review request - rasmol, Molecular Graphics Visualization Tool
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 15:05 -0800, Carl Byington wrote: 1) There were some menu icon references to files that are no longer in the package, but there is a rasmol_48x48.xpm image. What is the preferred mechanism to create menu icons, where do they go, etc? Follow the fd.o icon theme specification: http://standards.freedesktop.org/icon-theme-spec/icon-theme-spec-latest.html the short version is that at a minimum you should stick an icon with the same name as the binary, extension / file format .png, in /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps . If upstream provides icons in any other resolution, include those in the appropriate directory; if upstream provides an SVG, include it in /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps . The .desktop file should list the icon as simply the main part of the filename, with no extension (so if the icon is rasmol.png , the .desktop file should state Icon=rasmol ). However, see below... 2) There does not seem to be much point in creating gui icons for this, since it seems to be intended to run from a command prompt in a terminal. The program uses stdin to read commands, and the data is then displayed in a graphic window. Unless there is an easy way to create an icon that launches a gnome-terminal which in turn runs the rasmol binary, and allows the user to then type commands into that terminal session. ...that sounds like you shouldn't ship a menu entry at all, to me. As you say, it would be rather pointless. But I dunno if there's a policy requirement that you should anyway. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Review request...
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:38:31 +0100, Martin wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 Hm... on a very quick first look, you obviously don't follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Package_Release The difference being that *you* point out a specific item in the guidelines (helpful!) whereas the reviewer pointed at the top-level Wiki page for maintainers only. What the heck? Comment 10 in that ticket is either a bad joke or poor attitude, IMO. If everybody were aware of all guidelines, remembered them all the time and never made mistakes, we would not need the review process and not the sponsorship process either. With regard to the sub-packages and the dozens of conditionals, at least making use of %bcond_with based conditional builds would be worthwhile. See e.g. /usr/lib/rpm/macros for bcond documentation. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Review request...
may be, but sponsors or reviewers doesn't have entire day free time. I have only asked reporter to post spec file + src.rpm file. The difference being that *you* point out a specific item in the guidelines (helpful!) whereas the reviewer pointed at the top-level Wiki page for maintainers only. What the heck? Comment 10 in that ticket is either a bad joke or poor attitude, IMO. If everybody were aware of all guidelines, remembered them all the time and never made mistakes, we would not need the review process and not the sponsorship process either. With regard to the sub-packages and the dozens of conditionals, at least making use of %bcond_with based conditional builds would be worthwhile. See e.g. /usr/lib/rpm/macros for bcond documentation. -- Itamar Reis Peixoto e-mail/msn/google talk/sip: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br skype: itamarjp icq: 81053601 +55 11 4063 5033 +55 34 3221 8599 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Review request...
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:44:50 -0200, Itamar wrote: may be, but sponsors or reviewers doesn't have entire day free time. True, but an entire day is not needed. And nobody forces you to become a reviewer [or a sponsor] and spend any time at all on reviewing or guiding [new] packagers. The community of Fedora Packagers can only work fine if everybody stays polite and calm even during disagreement [or misunderstandings and foreign language barriers]. I have only asked reporter to post spec file + src.rpm file. Many packagers don't know that maintaining a proper spec %changelog for relevant spec file changes and %release bumps are considered important during review already. Others add meaningless/dummy %changelog entries even in Fedora cvs. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Review request...
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:44:50 -0200, Itamar wrote: may be, but sponsors or reviewers doesn't have entire day free time. True, but an entire day is not needed. And nobody forces you to become a reviewer [or a sponsor] and spend any time at all on reviewing or guiding [new] packagers. The community of Fedora Packagers can only work fine if everybody stays polite and calm even during disagreement [or misunderstandings and foreign language barriers]. I have only asked reporter to post spec file + src.rpm file. Many packagers don't know that maintaining a proper spec %changelog for relevant spec file changes and %release bumps are considered important during review already. Others add meaningless/dummy %changelog entries even in Fedora cvs. I agree, for me it's very important to post updated spec file + src.rpm with or without changelog bumped Itamar Reis Peixoto e-mail/msn/google talk/sip: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br skype: itamarjp icq: 81053601 +55 11 4063 5033 +55 34 3221 8599 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Review request...
Michael Schwendt wrote: Many packagers don't know that maintaining a proper spec %changelog for relevant spec file changes and %release bumps are considered important during review already. Others add meaningless/dummy %changelog entries even in Fedora cvs. But that's a people issue that needs to be solved, not papered over in the name of being nice. Sadly, incompetence as in unfamiliarity with guidelines which are assumed to be prerequisites for proper packaging is growing in our ranks (both from new packagers and from people who ought to know better), something needs to be done about it. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Review request...
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 02:23:22AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Michael Schwendt wrote: Many packagers don't know that maintaining a proper spec %changelog for relevant spec file changes and %release bumps are considered important during review already. Others add meaningless/dummy %changelog entries even in Fedora cvs. But that's a people issue that needs to be solved, not papered over in the name of being nice. Sadly, incompetence as in unfamiliarity with guidelines which are assumed to be prerequisites for proper packaging is growing in our ranks (both from new packagers and from people who ought to know better), something needs to be done about it. Such as? josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Review request...
Josh Boyer wrote: On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 02:23:22AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Michael Schwendt wrote: Many packagers don't know that maintaining a proper spec %changelog for relevant spec file changes and %release bumps are considered important during review already. Others add meaningless/dummy %changelog entries even in Fedora cvs. But that's a people issue that needs to be solved, not papered over in the name of being nice. Sadly, incompetence as in unfamiliarity with guidelines which are assumed to be prerequisites for proper packaging is growing in our ranks (both from new packagers and from people who ought to know better), something needs to be done about it. Such as? * Such as the very issue Michael Schwendt was pointing out (see quote). * Such as continuous accidental upgrade path breakage due to widespread unfamiliarity with Release/disttag handling (e.g. I keep having to explain why and when to use -1.fc12.1 style versioning). * Such as the assorted packaging mistakes which are caught by people watching the commits list and pointed out on this list (with the offending maintainer CCed). etc. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Review request...
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Josh Boyer wrote: On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 02:23:22AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Michael Schwendt wrote: Many packagers don't know that maintaining a proper spec %changelog for relevant spec file changes and %release bumps are considered important during review already. Others add meaningless/dummy %changelog entries even in Fedora cvs. But that's a people issue that needs to be solved, not papered over in the name of being nice. Sadly, incompetence as in unfamiliarity with guidelines which are assumed to be prerequisites for proper packaging is growing in our ranks (both from new packagers and from people who ought to know better), something needs to be done about it. Such as? * Such as the very issue Michael Schwendt was pointing out (see quote). * Such as continuous accidental upgrade path breakage due to widespread unfamiliarity with Release/disttag handling (e.g. I keep having to explain why and when to use -1.fc12.1 style versioning). * Such as the assorted packaging mistakes which are caught by people watching the commits list and pointed out on this list (with the offending maintainer CCed). etc. I think he is asking what that something is when you said something needs to be done about it. Orcan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Review request...
On 11/18/2009 06:23 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Michael Schwendt wrote: Many packagers don't know that maintaining a proper spec %changelog for relevant spec file changes and %release bumps are considered important during review already. Others add meaningless/dummy %changelog entries even in Fedora cvs. But that's a people issue that needs to be solved, not papered over in the name of being nice. Sadly, incompetence as in unfamiliarity with guidelines which are assumed to be prerequisites for proper packaging is growing in our ranks (both from new packagers and from people who ought to know better), something needs to be done about it. For sure. Personally I've been using Redhat/Fedora for years now, but this is my first package submission to fedora. I've wanted to get involved for awhile now. I had read the guidelines, and honestly want to provide a properly configured package. I think (and this very well could have been a language issue) that knowing what the issue I'm missing in my current spec would help immensely. I mean I know there are packaging guidelines, and there is a lot of information there, so it is plausible for someone new not to see sub documentation or notice that their spec isn't in compliance. Having the exact issue pointed out helps with the learning. Is there a 'ReviewingReviews' guideline? Would that even help? Anyway, I hope to get some feedback on the actual review too, but I mainly started this thread because I wasn't sure what I wasn't doing. I was asked for a scratch build which I *thought* I had provided a link to. I provided links to spec files and srpms. However was continually being asked for that same thing, and the requests and my responses were obviously not being understood by either party. I posted to make sure I wasn't missing something obvious, some guideline of 'Here's how to post your spec file, srpm and scratch build', if I wasn't doing it correctly. Sincerely trying to provide the best package I can, Nathanael -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Review request...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: On 11/18/2009 06:23 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Michael Schwendt wrote: Many packagers don't know that maintaining a proper spec %changelog for relevant spec file changes and %release bumps are considered important during review already. Others add meaningless/dummy %changelog entries even in Fedora cvs. But that's a people issue that needs to be solved, not papered over in the name of being nice. Sadly, incompetence as in unfamiliarity with guidelines which are assumed to be prerequisites for proper packaging is growing in our ranks (both from new packagers and from people who ought to know better), something needs to be done about it. For sure. Personally I've been using Redhat/Fedora for years now, but this is my first package submission to fedora. I've wanted to get involved for awhile now. I had read the guidelines, and honestly want to provide a properly configured package. I think (and this very well could have been a language issue) that knowing what the issue I'm missing in my current spec would help immensely. I mean I know there are packaging guidelines, and there is a lot of information there, so it is plausible for someone new not to see sub documentation or notice that their spec isn't in compliance. Having the exact issue pointed out helps with the learning. Is there a 'ReviewingReviews' guideline? Would that even help? Anyway, I hope to get some feedback on the actual review too, but I mainly started this thread because I wasn't sure what I wasn't doing. I was asked for a scratch build which I *thought* I had provided a link to. I provided links to spec files and srpms. However was continually being asked for that same thing, and the requests and my responses were obviously not being understood by either party. I posted to make sure I wasn't missing something obvious, some guideline of 'Here's how to post your spec file, srpm and scratch build', if I wasn't doing it correctly. Sincerely trying to provide the best package I can, Nathanael There is a Review Guidelines page that is supposed to be the basis for package reviews: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines but they honestly only scratch the bare minimum of the full set of Packaging Guidelines. My take, as a comparatively inexperienced packager, is that packaging is such a wide ranging subject that it's not something that you can gain proficiency at without gaining the experience of doing it a lot, and in the process failing a lot and learning from the failure. 6 months from now, you'll likely look back on your first few packages, as I did, and wonder 'how did that ever pass the review process?', or 'what was my sponsor thinking when he approved of me?'. The packaging guidelines, are honestly sooo voluminous, and also so scattered, that it's an interesting problem for new packagers, and the getting started as a packager documentation is the same way. Much of that could be improved (and at one time there was an effort going on towards that end.) but it will never become 'easy'. In the end, don't hesitate to ask for help or say you don't know. Part of the process is learning how to become effectively lost. Failure, within Fedora is OK, and even encouraged, provided you correct it and learn from it. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Use GnuPG with Firefox : http://getfiregpg.org (Version: 0.7.10) iEYEARECAAYFAksEwFIACgkQkZOYj+cNI1fNxACgqS4lso7EkKaCpmGURK0G0TZH s24An0ryEFUdt8sE1TgvOScN9hJKRC7w =PBdd -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Review request...
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 16:10 -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: Hello, I just posted my first review request a few days ago. I think someone has been trying to help me through that process. Up to now I've felt like I've been following instructions. Could someone please review the information in the following (not necessarily review the request), to see if I've completely lost it and am not understanding what is being requested of me? I feel like I'm complying but got some odd message about not following instructions and so won't be helped. When I think I'm doing what they ask. Anyway a total packaging noob (for fedora atleast, we maintain a bunch of software in RPM format for CentOS and Fedora workstations inhouse). I've read the guidlines as best I can, and responded to requests on the review so I'm just wondering what I may be missing... https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 Thanks, Nathanael Hm... on a very quick first look, you obviously don't follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Package_Release Your release should look something like 0.x.BETA4, not just BETA4. Plus every time you update the SPEC, you should also increase the x ;-) I'm not sure if it's explicitly in the guidelines somewhere or not (haven't ever used this kind of thing myself), but you appear to generate subpackages based on some build time conditionals -- (at least IMHO) it's not a good approach. Do you really need these conditionals anyway? Why not just build all the subpackages that are worth building? Martin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Review request...
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 21:45 -0200, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: Can you post this info in the bug report ? I was just about to at your request (I think one of the two places is enough ;-) but noticed that Nathan was faster in applying relevant changes. Note that I haven't done a throughout check, only pointed what I noticed on quick look, so there *might* be more problems. Supposing I'll take a closer look at it tomorrow (no promises though), I'll point out anything other that I find in the bug report itself. Martin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Review request...
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 04:10:48PM -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: Hello, I just posted my first review request a few days ago. I think someone has been trying to help me through that process. Up to now I've felt like I've been following instructions. Could someone please review the information in the following (not necessarily review the request), to see if I've completely lost it and am not understanding what is being requested of me? I feel like I'm complying but got some odd message about not following instructions and so won't be helped. When I think I'm doing what they ask. Anyway a total packaging noob (for fedora atleast, we maintain a bunch of software in RPM format for CentOS and Fedora workstations inhouse). I've read the guidlines as best I can, and responded to requests on the review so I'm just wondering what I may be missing... He is wanting you to increment Release each time you change something, and post a URL to the updated SRPM. There is a language barrier issue here, and the reviewer could have had a bit more patience. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Review Request...
Hello, I just submitted my first package for review. I'm not sure how to mark it as need sponsor. I've created my FAS account and signed the cla. I've started a scratch build to see how it works on the other arches. I've compiled locally on f12 for x86_64. Do I need to do anything else to mark it as need sponsor? Otherwise I assume I just wait for feedback via the bugzilla entry correct? Thanks, -- Nathanael Noblet -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Review Request...
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 11:44:39AM -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: Hello, I just submitted my first package for review. I'm not sure how to mark it as need sponsor. I've created my FAS account and signed the cla. I've started a scratch build to see how it works on the other arches. I've compiled locally on f12 for x86_64. Do I need to do anything else to mark it as need sponsor? Otherwise You should add you review request as blocker for FE_NEEDSPONSOR bug. It is described in yellow table at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Create_Your_Review_Request I assume I just wait for feedback via the bugzilla entry correct? Basically yes. -- Tomasz Torcz ,,If you try to upissue this patchset I shall be seeking xmpp: zdzich...@chrome.pl an IP-routable hand grenade.'' -- Andrew Morton (LKML) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Review Request...
On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 11:44 -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: Hello, I just submitted my first package for review. I'm not sure how to mark it as need sponsor. I've created my FAS account and signed the cla. I've started a scratch build to see how it works on the other arches. I've compiled locally on f12 for x86_64. Do I need to do anything else to mark it as need sponsor? Otherwise I assume I just wait for feedback via the bugzilla entry correct? Just mention in your review request that you need sponsoring. Here is detailed document how to join to package maintainers: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Create_Your_Review_Request Thanks, -- Nathanael Noblet Krzesimir. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
[Bug 472096] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Assemble - Assemble multiple Regular Expressions into a single RE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472096 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-11-10 22:58:16 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
Review Request: kompozer - Web Authoring System
Hi: I'm looking for a reviewer for Kompozer. A nice fact is the Kompozer development is very active this days and the 0.8.* series are pretty stable. I think this is a good tool for Fedora. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519521 Spec URL: http://olea.org/tmp/kompozer.spec SRPM URL: http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-11/kompozer-0.8-0.2.b1.fc11.src.rpm Description: A complete Web authoring system for Linux Desktop users, similar to Microsoft Windows programs like FrontPage and Dreamweaver. KompoZer is an unofficial branch of Nvu, previously developed by Linspire Inc. It makes managing a Web site a snap. Now anyone can create Web pages and manage a Web site with no technical expertise or HTML knowledge. Features * WYSIWYG editing of pages, making Web creation as easy as typing a letter with your word processor. * Integrated file management via FTP. Simply log in to your Web site and navigate through your files, editing Web pages on the fly, directly from your site. * Reliable HTML code creation that works with today's most popular browsers. * Jump between WYSIWYG editing mode and HTML using tabs. * Tabbed editing to make working on multiple pages a snap. * Powerful support for frames, forms, tables, and templates. -- A. Ismael Olea González http://olea.org/diario/ http://aduaneros.org, la ONG sin futuro. El mundo debe empezar a tener miedo a un planeta OLEA signature.asc Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Review Request: kompozer - Web Authoring System
Am Montag, den 12.10.2009, 23:16 +0200 schrieb Ismael Olea: Description: A complete Web authoring system for Linux Desktop users, similar to Microsoft Windows programs like FrontPage and Dreamweaver. Please remove that part. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Trademarks_in_Summary_or_Description It makes managing a Web site a snap. Now anyone can create Web pages and manage a Web site with no technical expertise or HTML knowledge. IMO this the most important part from a user's POV, so it should be at the beginning. Regards, Christoph -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Fwd: [Bug 249824] Review Request: last.fm - listen to last.fm radio stations
MAS == Michel Alexandre Salim michael.silva...@gmail.com writes: MAS Who is this Piotr Drag and why is he suddenly Cc:ing himself on MAS very old bug requests? I assume you mean un-ccing himself. Do you believe he has violated some rule by removing himself from the CC list of several bugs? I can't see how he's done anything even remotely improper. I can't see why his identity eveen remotely of any concern. - J -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
[Bug 502358] Review Request: mojomojo - Catalyst DBIx::Class powered Wiki
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502358 --- Comment #11 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2009-09-06 07:22:50 EDT --- Another upstream update. SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/review/mojomojo-0.999040-1.fc12.src.rpm Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1658116 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 502358] Review Request: mojomojo - Catalyst DBIx::Class powered Wiki
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502358 --- Comment #10 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2009-08-08 06:54:13 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/mojomojo.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/mojomojo-0.999032-1.fc12.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1590934 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 502358] Review Request: mojomojo - Catalyst DBIx::Class powered Wiki
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502358 --- Comment #9 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2009-07-31 05:02:46 EDT --- There's a new upstream version now with additional dependencies. I'm in the process of packaging them, so will take a little while before this gets updated again (I knew I should have been quicker to fix the issues in comment #7). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 502358] Review Request: mojomojo - Catalyst DBIx::Class powered Wiki
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502358 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-15 10:45:52 EDT --- Setting the fedora-review flag since that seems to have been overlooked. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
Re: OpenFWWF and Fedora (please look at the review request...)
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Jason L Tibbitts IIIti...@math.uh.edu wrote: That's absolutely no incentive to me; substitute Dr. Pepper or some good tea, though I have some free time today so I'll try to take a look. Good tea can be arranged. :-) Richard. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
[Bug 502358] Review Request: mojomojo - Catalyst DBIx::Class powered Wiki
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502358 --- Comment #7 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2009-06-16 23:15:52 EDT --- Thanks for the feedback. I'll add the necessary requires for perl(JSON), but I think the real problem lies upstream (Catalyst::View::JSON defaults to requiring JSON rather than let JSON::Any pick an implementation automatically - will see if upstream are okay to change that behaviour). And I'll explicitly add the index and upload directories to %files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 502358] Review Request: mojomojo - Catalyst DBIx::Class powered Wiki
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502358
Lorenzo Villani lvill...@binaryhelix.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lvill...@binaryhelix.net
--- Comment #6 from Lorenzo Villani lvill...@binaryhelix.net 2009-06-15
11:29:29 EDT ---
Today I tried to install this package but mojomojo refused to start because
perl-JSON was not installed.
On a side note: I also had to make /var/lib/mojomojo/{index,upload} writable
for the apache user.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 502358] Review Request: mojomojo - Catalyst DBIx::Class powered Wiki
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502358
Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||cw...@alumni.drew.edu
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cw...@alumni.drew.edu
--- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2009-06-09 02:12:57 EDT
---
Ok. One last package to get in rawhide and I can update Catalyst::Devel to
latest over there... Let me get those in and we can start with 5.8 as a
baseline for this review.
I've only taken a cursory look at the spec so far, but given that this came
from the CPAN we may want to explicitly provide: perl-MojoMojo =
%{version}-%{release}.
I'm also bringing HTML::Entities (perl-HTML-Parser) up to 3.60; this should
allow for the versioned depends.
The cpan.org url is the canonical url: for packages from the CPAN, but given
that http://mojomojo.org exists perhaps we should use it?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 502358] Review Request: mojomojo - Catalyst DBIx::Class powered Wiki
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502358 --- Comment #5 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2009-06-09 23:11:59 EDT --- Yep, all three of those make sense. And I only needed one tiny little bugfix (already in upstream) to make it build against the latest Catalyst-Runtime. Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/mojomojo.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/mojomojo-0.999029-2.fc12.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1402924 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 502358] Review Request: mojomojo - Catalyst DBIx::Class powered Wiki
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502358 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-perl-devel-l...@redh ||at.com --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2009-05-26 23:44:56 EDT --- build now available: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1378830 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 492712] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Static - Serve static files with HTTP::Server::Simple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492712 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-02 13:10:02 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Static-0.07-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 492712] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Static - Serve static files with HTTP::Server::Simple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492712 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.07-2.fc10 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 492712] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Static - Serve static files with HTTP::Server::Simple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492712 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.07-2.fc10 |0.07-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 492712] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Static - Serve static files with HTTP::Server::Simple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492712 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-02 13:22:30 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Static-0.07-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 492712] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Static - Serve static files with HTTP::Server::Simple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492712 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-31 07:50:51 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Static-0.07-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Static-0.07-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 492712] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Static - Serve static files with HTTP::Server::Simple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492712 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-31 07:50:57 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Static-0.07-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Static-0.07-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 492712] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Static - Serve static files with HTTP::Server::Simple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492712 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-03-30 03:00:38 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1264875 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 79463e02883f6d66018b371eea59c137 HTTP-Server-Simple-Static-0.07.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=5, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.26 cusr 0.03 csys = 0.31 CPU) + Package perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Static-0.07-1.fc11.noarch = Provides: perl(HTTP::Server::Simple::Static) = 0.07 Requires: /usr/bin/perl perl(File::MMagic) perl(File::Spec::Functions) perl(HTTP::Server::Simple::Static) perl(IO::File) perl(MIME::Types) perl(URI::Escape) perl(base) perl(bytes) perl(lib) perl(strict) perl(warnings) Suggestions: 1) I think example.pl should be installed as %doc file. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 492712] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Static - Serve static files with HTTP::Server::Simple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492712 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #2 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-03-30 18:09:39 EDT --- Thanks for the quick review! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Static Short Description: Serve static files with HTTP::Server::Simple Owners: spot Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 492712] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Static - Serve static files with HTTP::Server::Simple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492712 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 492712] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Static - Serve static files with HTTP::Server::Simple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492712 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-perl-devel-l...@redh ||at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 485621] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Interface to the Mozilla embedding widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485621 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-13 14:42:23 EDT --- perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.08-3.fc10.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 485621] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Interface to the Mozilla embedding widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485621 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||0.08-3.fc10.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 485621] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Interface to the Mozilla embedding widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485621 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-09 01:56:02 EDT --- perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.08-3.fc10.1 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.08-3.fc10.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 485621] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Interface to the Mozilla embedding widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485621 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 485621] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Interface to the Mozilla embedding widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485621 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-03-05 15:06:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 485621] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Interface to the Mozilla embedding widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485621
--- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2009-03-03 12:24:25 EDT
---
Basically, Perl packages should own everything they provide (including
directories) under %{perl_vendorarch} or %{perl_vendorlib} except
%{perl_vendorarch}/auto Even if they're already owned by another Perl
package. (Rationale being that as we move to 5.10.1, 5.10.2, etc, we will see
directory ownership start to be a bit fuzzy.)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl#Directory_Ownership
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 485621] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Interface to the Mozilla embedding widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485621 --- Comment #4 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2009-03-03 12:56:30 EDT --- Thanks for pointing me to this Guidelines section I haven't noticed... It seems clear now :) http://remi.fedorapeople.org/perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed.spec http://remi.fedorapeople.org/perl-XML-Entities-0.02-3.fc8.src.rpm %changelog * Tue Mar 03 2009 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com - 0.08-3 - Fix from review : Gtk2 dir ownership -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 250804] Review Request: perl-Encode-Detect - Detects the encoding of data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250804 James Ralston rals...@pobox.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #26 from James Ralston rals...@pobox.com 2009-03-03 13:56:36 EDT --- Yes, I think we can close this. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 485621] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Interface to the Mozilla embedding widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485621 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2009-03-03 20:37:31 EDT --- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 485621] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Interface to the Mozilla embedding widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485621 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2009-03-04 02:28:44 EDT --- Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed Short Description: Interface to the Mozilla embedding widget Owners: remi Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 485621] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Interface to the Mozilla embedding widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485621
Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||cw...@alumni.drew.edu
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cw...@alumni.drew.edu
Alias||perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2009-03-03 00:32:10 EDT
---
rpmlint's warnings are expected for Perl packages; and while
MozEmbed.so()(64bit) will need to be filtered, we're still figuring out the
best way to do that over on fedora-perl-devel-list, so that's not a blocker
right now.
1) MozEmbed.xs and other source files say LGPLv2+.
2) %check should be included, even if make test needs to be wrapped in some
construct to prevent it from running in mock, e.g.:
%{?_with_display_tests: make test}
This will allow rebuilding locally using rpmbuild --with display-tests or
defining %_with_display_tests 1 in ~/.rpmmacros.
3) '%{__rm}' should be replaced with just 'rm', or make and chmod also need to
be their macro representations. (Though I always prefer the %{_fixperms} chmod
incantation :))
4) %{perl_vendorarch}/Gtk2 and %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/Gtk2 need to be included
as dirs in %files. One easy way to do so is:
%{perl_vendorarch}/*
%exclude %dir %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/
koji @ http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1215907
Source tarball matches upstream:
23ffb8e4134ee8a8897149bf9db43d400cdbbe17 Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.08.tar.gz
23ffb8e4134ee8a8897149bf9db43d400cdbbe17 Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.08.tar.gz.srpm
Provides, requires and rpmlint looks sane:
= perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.08-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm =
rpmlint
perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Gtk2/MozEmbed/Install/gtkmozembed2perl.h
perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Gtk2/MozEmbed/Install/gtkmozembed2perl-autogen.h
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
provides for perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.08-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm
MozEmbed.so()(64bit)
perl(Gtk2::MozEmbed) = 0.08
perl(Gtk2::MozEmbed::Install::Files)
perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed = 0.08-1.fc10
perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed(x86-64) = 0.08-1.fc10
requires for perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.08-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm
gecko-libs = 1.9.0.6
libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libcairo.so.2()(64bit)
libdl.so.2()(64bit)
libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libnspr4.so()(64bit)
libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
libplc4.so()(64bit)
libplds4.so()(64bit)
libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
librt.so.1()(64bit)
libxpcom.so()(64bit)
libxul.so()(64bit)
perl = 0:5.008
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
perl(DynaLoader)
perl(Glib) = 1.180
perl(Gtk2)
perl(Gtk2) = 1.081
perl(strict)
perl(warnings)
rtld(GNU_HASH)
= perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-debuginfo-0.08-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm =
rpmlint
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
provides for perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-debuginfo-0.08-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm
perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-debuginfo = 0.08-1.fc10
perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-debuginfo(x86-64) = 0.08-1.fc10
requires for perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-debuginfo-0.08-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm
Address #1-4 and I think we're in business :-)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 485621] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Interface to the Mozilla embedding widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485621 --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2009-03-03 02:35:10 EDT --- 1, 2 and 3 fixed About 4, I don't think this folders need to be owned be the package. Both are already owned by perl-Gtk2 which is Required . Both are also owned by perl-Gtk2-TrayIcon which is probably a mistake (or an exception for the Guidelines exists for perl ?) Guidelines : Packages must not own files already owned by other packages. http://remi.fedorapeople.org/perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed.spec http://remi.fedorapeople.org/perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.08-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 481257] Review Request: perl-Devel-SmallProf - Per-line Perl profiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481257 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 485621] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Interface to the Mozilla embedding widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485621 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||485961 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 485621] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Interface to the Mozilla embedding widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485621 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-perl-devel-l...@redh ||at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 250804] Review Request: perl-Encode-Detect - Detects the encoding of data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250804 --- Comment #25 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2009-02-12 03:05:04 EDT --- Erm, can we close this? :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 466906] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-SetID - Provides api for correctly changing user identity
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466906 Miroslav Suchy msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 466906] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-SetID - Provides api for correctly changing user identity
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466906 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-02-02 23:13:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 466906] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-SetID - Provides api for correctly changing user identity
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466906 Miroslav Suchy msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-perl-devel-l...@redh ||at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 475242] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475242 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 475242] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475242 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-29 18:06:18 EDT --- perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.08-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 475242] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475242 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-29 18:08:33 EDT --- perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.08-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 475427] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu - HTML::FormFu controller for Catalyst
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475427 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-29 18:07:10 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.03007-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 474864] Review Request: perl-Test-Signature - Automated SIGNATURE testing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474864 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2009-01-28 11:37:37 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Test-Signature New Branches: EL-5 Owners: iarnell InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 474864] Review Request: perl-Test-Signature - Automated SIGNATURE testing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474864 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-28 19:28:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 474867] Review Request: perl-B-Utils - Helper functions for op tree manipulation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474867 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2009-01-28 00:12:49 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-B-Utils New Branches: EL-5 Owners: iarnell iburrell InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 475242] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475242 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ianburr...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2009-01-28 00:18:33 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer New Branches: EL-5 Owners: iarnell iburrell InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 472072] Review Request: perl-Sub-Override - Perl extension for easily overriding subroutines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472072 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ianburr...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2009-01-28 00:20:56 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Sub-Override New Branches: EL-5 Owners: iarnell iburrell InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 475242] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475242 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-28 00:46:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 472072] Review Request: perl-Sub-Override - Perl extension for easily overriding subroutines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472072 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-28 00:48:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 472664] Review Request: perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple - Easy to use HTML::TokeParser interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472664 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-28 00:49:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 474867] Review Request: perl-B-Utils - Helper functions for op tree manipulation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474867 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-28 01:00:09 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 481257] Review Request: perl-Devel-SmallProf - Per-line Perl profiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481257 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-26 20:55:25 EDT --- perl-Devel-SmallProf-2.02-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Devel-SmallProf'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1046 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 481257] Review Request: perl-Devel-SmallProf - Per-line Perl profiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481257 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-26 20:55:18 EDT --- perl-Devel-SmallProf-2.02-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update perl-Devel-SmallProf'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1041 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 481257] Review Request: perl-Devel-SmallProf - Per-line Perl profiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481257 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2009-01-23 09:12:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Devel-SmallProf Short Description: Per-line Perl profiler Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 481257] Review Request: perl-Devel-SmallProf - Per-line Perl profiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481257 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-23 18:29:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 481257] Review Request: perl-Devel-SmallProf - Per-line Perl profiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481257 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||perl-Devel-SmallProf --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2009-01-24 01:53:51 EDT --- Provides: perl(DB) is bogus - I stripped it before checking in and building. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 481257] Review Request: perl-Devel-SmallProf - Per-line Perl profiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481257 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-perl-devel-l...@redh ||at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 481257] Review Request: perl-Devel-SmallProf - Per-line Perl profiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481257 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-01-23 00:28:09 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1075567 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 498704ed1b888fc62b0c7092f8b590f5 Devel-SmallProf-2.02.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + make test gaveAll tests successful. Files=5, Tests=14, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.05 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.09 CPU) + Package perl-Devel-SmallProf-2.02-1.fc11 = Provides: perl(DB) perl(Devel::SmallProf) = 2.02 Requires: perl(Time::HiRes) perl(strict) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 475242] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475242 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-14 21:51:38 EDT --- perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.08-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Data-Dump-Streamer'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0353 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 475242] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475242 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-14 22:01:26 EDT --- perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.08-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update perl-Data-Dump-Streamer'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0466 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 475242] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475242 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-13 00:19:47 EDT --- perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.08-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.08-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 475242] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475242 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-13 00:19:43 EDT --- perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.08-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.08-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 475427] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu - HTML::FormFu controller for Catalyst
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475427 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-13 02:17:16 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.03007-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.03007-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 477122] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles - Role based authorization for Catalyst based on Catalyst::Plugin::Authentication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477122 manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed: What|Removed |Added CC||so...@cmu.edu --- Comment #8 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2009-01-11 18:51:09 EDT --- *** Bug 478940 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 474867] Review Request: perl-B-Utils - Helper functions for op tree manipulation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474867 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-07 04:10:35 EDT --- perl-B-Utils-0.07-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
