Re: Split Media - A use case

2009-06-16 Thread Kevin Kofler
Bill McGonigle wrote:
 One population I've been recommending for Fedora lately is folks with
 Apple PPC gear which has been abandoned by Apple.  Devices like iBooks
 often came standard with CD-ROM.

PPC is planned to become a secondary architecture in Fedora 13. At that
point, it will be up to the secondary architecture team to decide how they
will ship Fedora for PPCs. (But of course they will need split media
support in Anaconda if they're planning to ship split CDs.)

Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Split Media - A use case

2009-06-16 Thread Josh Boyer
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:40:07AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Bill McGonigle wrote:
 One population I've been recommending for Fedora lately is folks with
 Apple PPC gear which has been abandoned by Apple.  Devices like iBooks
 often came standard with CD-ROM.

PPC is planned to become a secondary architecture in Fedora 13. At that
point, it will be up to the secondary architecture team to decide how they
will ship Fedora for PPCs. (But of course they will need split media
support in Anaconda if they're planning to ship split CDs.)

I have no qualms about dropping split media support in regards to PPC.

josh

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Split Media - A use case

2009-06-15 Thread Frank Murphy

On 15/06/09 08:15, G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote:



I'm providing severl friends and relatives with CD install images via
these genned iso's. So at least 5 more CD sets would have been fetched
if I didn't do this.



What was the underlying reason for the CDS' over DVD\LiveCD?

Frank

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Split Media - A use case

2009-06-15 Thread Jesse Keating
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 04:28 -0400, G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote:
 That's what they wanted to use :-) 

Sorry, I'm not seeing that as a valid use case.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- FreedomĀ² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: Split Media - A use case

2009-06-15 Thread Michael Cronenworth
G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote:
 That's what they wanted to use :-) besides it was quicker to gen
 them than to download the live CDs or DVDs.
 

CDs will be much slower than a DVD in terms of read speed. You'll also
have to swap disks out during install (hello 1998). Why do they want
to use CDs?

In fact, why are you wasting a DVD or CDs? That's not very green of you.
Give them a USB stick with the DVD install ISO loaded on it so it can be
reused for more useful things.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Split Media - A use case

2009-06-15 Thread Bill McGonigle

On 06/15/2009 12:24 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:

In fact, why are you wasting a DVD or CDs? That's not very green of you.
Give them a USB stick with the DVD install ISO loaded on it so it can be
reused for more useful things.


On a machine with only a CD drive, it's not unreasonable to assume 
either a BIOS that can't boot a USB stick or USB 1, which is likely 
slower than IDE CD.


One population I've been recommending for Fedora lately is folks with 
Apple PPC gear which has been abandoned by Apple.  Devices like iBooks 
often came standard with CD-ROM.


If I'm helping someone with an install, it's usually at my office with a 
fast cable modem.  Around here, though, more than half of the population 
is on dial-up.  Even a LiveCD install isn't sufficient for many of them, 
though delta RPM's are a major advance for them, once they've installed 
the bulk of data.


Does Fedora want to exclude folks with old machines on dial-up?  That 
would be a strategic decision with positive and negative implications.


I seed the Centos 5.3 CD's because I use them quite a bit on older 
servers and see that set as one of my highest bandwidth users.  The 
mindset seemed to be for a while, for servers, it's not a multimedia 
machine, it doesn't need DVD.  That's the height of narrow foresight, 
but seemingly common in mid-sized companies' data centers.  And getting 
a replacement DVD for their stupid proprietary slim CD slot is somewhere 
between ludicrously expensive and impossible.  But they usually have 
USB2.  I could probably count a dozen machines I've installed from my 
own CD set.


Really, though, if I can compose a CD set from a repo or DVD, and it's 
ridiculously easy, I don't care if it's on the mirrors. Does jigdo make 
it that easy?  I haven't tried yet.


Does smolt report data on optical drives in machines?

-Bill

--
Bill McGonigle, Owner   Work: 603.448.4440
BFC Computing, LLC  Home: 603.448.1668
http://www.bfccomputing.com/Cell: 603.252.2606
Twitter, etc.: bill_mcgonigle   Page: 603.442.1833
Email, IM, VOIP: b...@bfccomputing.com
Blog: http://blog.bfccomputing.com/
VCard: http://bfccomputing.com/vcard/bill.vcf

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list