Re: Time for 2.6.30 in F-11?
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Bojan Smojverbo...@rexursive.com wrote: Now that .1 is out, is there anything in particular stopping F-11 from having this kernel? Worth mentioning— .30 makes a non-backwards-compatible BTRFS format change. So if you go .30 on a BTRFS system you can't go back. (though, I suppose that can be seen an argument for getting Fedora to .30 sooner) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Time for 2.6.30 in F-11?
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Gregory Maxwellgmaxw...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Bojan Smojverbo...@rexursive.com wrote: Now that .1 is out, is there anything in particular stopping F-11 from having this kernel? Worth mentioning— .30 makes a non-backwards-compatible BTRFS format change. So if you go .30 on a BTRFS system you can't go back. (though, I suppose that can be seen an argument for getting Fedora to .30 sooner) brtfs support was always if you care about data than don't use it or make backups -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Time for 2.6.30 in F-11?
CCing #fedora-kernel-list On 04.07.2009 16:12, Kevin Kofler wrote: Bojan Smojver wrote: Now that .1 is out, is there anything in particular stopping F-11 from having this kernel? And why is F10 still stuck on 2.6.27? 2.6.29 has been in updates-testing for ages now. Good question. Seems the ship state-of-the-art/nearly latest kernel versions from kernel.org as regular update for Fedora worked much better in the past. Is that for a specific reason or just a side effect of something (maintainer/responsibly changes maybe?). And yes, I know it's a lot of work to prepare updates from 2.6.x.y to 2.6.(x+1).y. So thx for that work -- it IMHO is definitely worth it as it makes people get drivers for new hardware without forcing them to switch to rawhide. That, btw and afaics, for quite some people was one of the reasons to chose Fedora. I for example use Fedora for testing at work mainly because I got latest kernels on Fedora automatically. Cu knurd -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Time for 2.6.30 in F-11?
Now that .1 is out, is there anything in particular stopping F-11 from having this kernel? -- Bojan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Time for 2.6.30 in F-11?
Hi, Users with Intel's integrated chips need the updated DRM in that kernel. I think that an update is highly recommended. -Ilyes On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Bojan Smojverbo...@rexursive.com wrote: Now that .1 is out, is there anything in particular stopping F-11 from having this kernel? -- Bojan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Time for 2.6.30 in F-11?
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 5:51 AM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Users with Intel's integrated chips need the updated DRM in that kernel. I think that an update is highly recommended. -Ilyes On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Bojan Smojverbo...@rexursive.com wrote: Now that .1 is out, is there anything in particular stopping F-11 from having this kernel? -- Bojan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list I concur I have five laptops and a few desktops with Intel graphics, and it would definitely be great if the update would be pushed through! -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Time for 2.6.30 in F-11?
Bojan Smojver wrote: Now that .1 is out, is there anything in particular stopping F-11 from having this kernel? And why is F10 still stuck on 2.6.27? 2.6.29 has been in updates-testing for ages now. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
