Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
Hi, the repository at http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/packages/ contains a lot of rawhide (f12) packages, so it can no longer be used on f11, was that intentional? Thanks, Thomas -- Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmail.com -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 05:10:58PM +0100, José Matos wrote: On Wednesday 26 August 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote: Hi, first off, thanks many people who sent me RFE and bugfix proposals. I've tried to fix most of them in the current package set in the testing repository: OK, I have finally installed texlive on F11. With this update all worked (with the exception of some quirks already reported in this list). Unfortunately in the end I had a non working latex. It was likely caused by the missing texlive-latex provides. It should be fixed with the current package set. Making this story short for some reason texlive-latex was not installed when I had update the system. Installing it fixed the problem. Does it make sense to have the latex packages depending on this? The main texlive package now contains a dependency to texlive-latexrecommended so all the LaTeX recomended stuff should be pulled in automatically when just installing texlive. Jindrich Thanks, Jindrich Thanks for the hard, :-) -- José Abílio -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 05:16:41PM -0400, Horst H. von Brand wrote: José Matos jama...@fc.up.pt wrote: On Friday 04 September 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote: It should be fixed now altogether with new packages in the repository. Jindrich One (really) minor hiccup, when installing all the doc files with yum install texlive-*-doc It is fixed now. I get a missing dependency texlive-wadalab-doc is needed by package texlive-cjk-doc. Excluding the later from the transaction works. This problems appears (unsurprisingly) on both F11 and rawhide. I get lots of dependency problems on (vanilla) rawhide x86_64. Stuff like: html2ps-1.0-0.3.b5.fc12.noarch, jadetex-3.13-8.fc12.noarch, linuxdoc-tools-0.9.65-2.fc12.x86_64, ... (perhaps due to other packages depending on texlive?) --skip-broken isn't able to fix the mess, and yum gives up. I'm not sure what is happenning on rawhide. Need to check. Jindrich -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de InformaticaFono: +56 32 2654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 234 Fax: +56 32 2797513 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
On Tuesday 08 September 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote: The main texlive package now contains a dependency to texlive-latexrecommended so all the LaTeX recomended stuff should be pulled in automatically when just installing texlive. Thank you. :-) It is nice to see texlive-2009 shaping so well for Fedora. :-D Jindrich -- José Abílio -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 06:47:58PM +0100, José Matos wrote: On Thursday 27 August 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote: On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 03:02:18PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote: Hi, first off, thanks many people who sent me RFE and bugfix proposals. I've tried to fix most of them in the current package set in the testing repository: rpm -i http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2009-0.1.fc11.noarc h.rpm Forgot to mention that the initial rawhide repository is now available as: rpm -i http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-rawhide-release-2009-0.1.fc11 .noarch.rpm The update when using the more recent rawhide failed. I suspect that the metadata is not updated as I get lots of Package does not match intended download. It should be fixed now altogether with new packages in the repository. Jindrich Jindrich -- José Abílio -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
On Friday 04 September 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote: It should be fixed now altogether with new packages in the repository. Jindrich Thank you. Now I have installed on rawhide and it works (TM). :-) -- José Abílio -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
On Friday 04 September 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote: It should be fixed now altogether with new packages in the repository. Jindrich One (really) minor hiccup, when installing all the doc files with yum install texlive-*-doc I get a missing dependency texlive-wadalab-doc is needed by package texlive-cjk-doc. Excluding the later from the transaction works. This problems appears (unsurprisingly) on both F11 and rawhide. -- José Abílio -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
José Matos jama...@fc.up.pt wrote: On Friday 04 September 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote: It should be fixed now altogether with new packages in the repository. Jindrich One (really) minor hiccup, when installing all the doc files with yum install texlive-*-doc I get a missing dependency texlive-wadalab-doc is needed by package texlive-cjk-doc. Excluding the later from the transaction works. This problems appears (unsurprisingly) on both F11 and rawhide. I get lots of dependency problems on (vanilla) rawhide x86_64. Stuff like: html2ps-1.0-0.3.b5.fc12.noarch, jadetex-3.13-8.fc12.noarch, linuxdoc-tools-0.9.65-2.fc12.x86_64, ... (perhaps due to other packages depending on texlive?) --skip-broken isn't able to fix the mess, and yum gives up. -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de InformaticaFono: +56 32 2654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 234 Fax: +56 32 2797513 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote: Hi, first off, thanks many people who sent me RFE and bugfix proposals. I've tried to fix most of them in the current package set in the testing repository: OK, I have finally installed texlive on F11. With this update all worked (with the exception of some quirks already reported in this list). Unfortunately in the end I had a non working latex. Making this story short for some reason texlive-latex was not installed when I had update the system. Installing it fixed the problem. Does it make sense to have the latex packages depending on this? Thanks, Jindrich Thanks for the hard, :-) -- José Abílio -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
On Thursday 27 August 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote: On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 03:02:18PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote: Hi, first off, thanks many people who sent me RFE and bugfix proposals. I've tried to fix most of them in the current package set in the testing repository: rpm -i http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2009-0.1.fc11.noarc h.rpm Forgot to mention that the initial rawhide repository is now available as: rpm -i http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-rawhide-release-2009-0.1.fc11 .noarch.rpm The update when using the more recent rawhide failed. I suspect that the metadata is not updated as I get lots of Package does not match intended download. Jindrich -- José Abílio -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
On Monday 31 August 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote: This should be fixed with the new packages in the repository now. The new packages obsolete the ancient tetex stuff: tetex-tex4ht tetex-IEEEtran tetex-bytefield tetex-elvevier tetex-perltex tetex-prosper and these utilities: dvipdfm dvipdfmx dvipng xdvi xdvipdfmx Installation of LyX/dvipdfm, etc. should work fine now. Jindrich Thank you. :-) I have successfully updated my system. The only problem I had was a2ps that requires tetex-fonts. After removing a2ps the update worked. -- José Abílio -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
2009/8/31 Patrice Dumas pertu...@free.fr: Hello, I haven't followed closely the new packaging of texlive, so you should take my comments with caution... On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 01:15:21PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote: The new packages obsolete the ancient tetex stuff: tetex-tex4ht I think that the stand-alone tex4ht could be better than the texlive one. It was updated many time a year in the past (but it may change). tetex-elvevier In the past, the version in CTAN of this package used to lag a lot. I'd still advise taking the files from the web, especially since there is also the old style in the stand-alone package. and these utilities: dvipdfm dvipdfmx dvipng xdvi xdvipdfmx Haven't some of those an upstream different from texlive? They do - however I lean towards using ones that come from texlive though, so we benefit from the integration work the TeXLive developers do. Once we start down the road of packaging everything with another upstream separately we get closer to basically developing out own TeX distribution, and we don't have the manpower to do that. A purest approach wouldn't consume the class files and packages from TeXLive either, but would rather take the .dtx files etc from ctan. Clearly this would be crazy. I think it's fair to regard TeXLive as upstream - in most cases the other upstreams are more like development sandboxes. Jonathan (who presently maintains or comaintains most of those packages at the mo). -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
Jonathan Underwood wrote: 2009/8/31 Patrice Dumas pertu...@free.fr: Hello, I haven't followed closely the new packaging of texlive, so you should take my comments with caution... On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 01:15:21PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote: The new packages obsolete the ancient tetex stuff: tetex-tex4ht I think that the stand-alone tex4ht could be better than the texlive one. It was updated many time a year in the past (but it may change). tetex-elvevier In the past, the version in CTAN of this package used to lag a lot. I'd still advise taking the files from the web, especially since there is also the old style in the stand-alone package. and these utilities: dvipdfm dvipdfmx dvipng xdvi xdvipdfmx Haven't some of those an upstream different from texlive? They do - however I lean towards using ones that come from texlive though, so we benefit from the integration work the TeXLive developers do. Once we start down the road of packaging everything with another upstream separately we get closer to basically developing out own TeX distribution, and we don't have the manpower to do that. A purest approach wouldn't consume the class files and packages from TeXLive either, but would rather take the .dtx files etc from ctan. Clearly this would be crazy. I think it's fair to regard TeXLive as upstream - in most cases the other upstreams are more like development sandboxes. Jonathan (who presently maintains or comaintains most of those packages at the mo). IIRC xdvipdfmx is from texlive (but has not been updated for some time) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
2009/9/1 Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com: IIRC xdvipdfmx is from texlive (but has not been updated for some time) Well, technically, upstream is the xetex project http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsiid=xetex_linux -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 09:27:10AM +0200, Stefan Grosse wrote: On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:16:33 +0200 Stefan Grosse singularit...@gmx.net wrote: SG dvipdfm-0.13.2d-40.fc11.i586 von installed hat SG Abhängigkeitsauflöse-Probleme -- Fehlende Abhängigkeit: SG libkpathsea.so.4 wird benötigt von Paket SG dvipdfm-0.13.2d-40.fc11.i586 (installed) Fehler: Fehlende SG Abhängigkeit: libkpathsea.so.4 wird benötigt von Paket SG dvipdfm-0.13.2d-40.fc11.i586 (installed) Just for the record: This was caused by LyX being (still) dependent on dvipdfm. Deleting LyX made an installation possible. This should be fixed with the new packages in the repository now. The new packages obsolete the ancient tetex stuff: tetex-tex4ht tetex-IEEEtran tetex-bytefield tetex-elvevier tetex-perltex tetex-prosper and these utilities: dvipdfm dvipdfmx dvipng xdvi xdvipdfmx Installation of LyX/dvipdfm, etc. should work fine now. Jindrich Cheers Stefan. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 05:14:33PM +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: Package texlive-dvips is obsoleted by texlive, trying to install texlive-2009-0.3.20090827.fc11.i586 instead This is obviously wrong obsolete, as dvips is actually provided by texlive-dvips, but for some reason unless I tell yum to specifically install the noarch package (by running yum install texlive-dvips.noarch), it insists on obsoleting it by texlive (i.e. when doing yum install texlive-dvips)... Otherwise the installation as well as short testing went smooth. Indeed. It will be fixed in the next build. Thanks, Jindrich Martin -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
Hello, I haven't followed closely the new packaging of texlive, so you should take my comments with caution... On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 01:15:21PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote: The new packages obsolete the ancient tetex stuff: tetex-tex4ht I think that the stand-alone tex4ht could be better than the texlive one. It was updated many time a year in the past (but it may change). tetex-elvevier In the past, the version in CTAN of this package used to lag a lot. I'd still advise taking the files from the web, especially since there is also the old style in the stand-alone package. and these utilities: dvipdfm dvipdfmx dvipng xdvi xdvipdfmx Haven't some of those an upstream different from texlive? -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:16:33 +0200 Stefan Grosse singularit...@gmx.net wrote: SG dvipdfm-0.13.2d-40.fc11.i586 von installed hat SG Abhängigkeitsauflöse-Probleme -- Fehlende Abhängigkeit: SG libkpathsea.so.4 wird benötigt von Paket SG dvipdfm-0.13.2d-40.fc11.i586 (installed) Fehler: Fehlende SG Abhängigkeit: libkpathsea.so.4 wird benötigt von Paket SG dvipdfm-0.13.2d-40.fc11.i586 (installed) Just for the record: This was caused by LyX being (still) dependent on dvipdfm. Deleting LyX made an installation possible. Cheers Stefan. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
On Saturday 29 August 2009 Stefan Grosse wrote: Just for the record: This was caused by LyX being (still) dependent on dvipdfm. Deleting LyX made an installation possible. This is one of those cases where rpm Suggests would be appropriate (when/if implemented). LyX does not depend in any way of dvipdfm, it will use it if it is available (and only if the user ask explicitly to use dvipdfm) but it will work happily if it is not present. Cheers Stefan. -- José Abílio -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
Message du 27/08/09 16:38 De : Jindrich Novy A : fedora-devel-list@redhat.com Copie à : fedora-fonts-l...@redhat.com, tcall...@redhat.com Objet : Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 03:02:18PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote: Hi, first off, thanks many people who sent me RFE and bugfix proposals. I've tried to fix most of them in the current package set in the testing repository: rpm -i http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2009-0.1.fc11.noarch.rpm Thanks a lot for continuing to work on sanitizing TEX packaging. I ll examine your font packages as soon as I can (probably mid september). At first look, it seems you re duplicating many existing packages because CTAN redistributes stuff it s not the actual upstream of. So IMHO you wont escape a package per package check for fonts (TEX specific stuff tends to be released at CPAN first, but that s not the case for generic resources like fonts) In the meanwhile please do check you re actually using the fontpackages-devel macros in your packages an try to run the audit script available there against your repo Regards -- Nicolas Mailhot Alt. 3790 m Créez votre adresse électronique prenom@laposte.net 1 Go d'espace de stockage, anti-spam et anti-virus intégrés. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote: Hi, first off, thanks many people who sent me RFE and bugfix proposals. I've tried to fix most of them in the current package set in the testing repository: rpm -i http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2009-0.1.fc11.noarch. rpm Thanks, Jindrich Hi, I have tried to update and now most of the previous problems have been solved but there is a new type of problem that has appeared. I get lots of these: Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2009 is needed by package texlive- amsfonts-2009-3.0.14555.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-texconfig-bin = 2009 is needed by package texlive-texconfig-2009-13822.fc11.noarch (texlive) I send attached the full list that I get. -- José Abílio Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-dvipdfm-bin = 2009 is needed by package texlive-dvipdfm-2009-0.13.2d.14549.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2009 is needed by package texlive-etex-2009-13530.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2009 is needed by package texlive-metafont-2009-13822.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2009 is needed by package texlive-geometry-2009-4.2.13293.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-kpathsea-bin = 2009 is needed by package texlive-babel-2009-3.8l.13530.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2009 is needed by package texlive-mfware-2009-13822.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2009 is needed by package texlive-texconfig-2009-13822.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-dvips = 2007-42.fc11 is needed by package texlive-utils-2007-42.fc11.i586 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2009 is needed by package texlive-pdftex-2009-1.40.9.14549.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-kpathsea-bin = 2009 is needed by package texlive-ifluatex-2009-1.2.14365.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-kpathsea-bin = 2009 is needed by package texlive-glyphlist-2009-13293.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2009 is needed by package texlive-ifluatex-2009-1.2.14365.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-kpathsea-bin = 2009 is needed by package texlive-texconfig-2009-13822.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-kpathsea-bin = 2009 is needed by package texlive-tetex-2009-3.0.14841.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2009 is needed by package texlive-dvipdfmx-2009-14829.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2009 is needed by package texlive-ifxetex-2009-0.5.13293.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2009 is needed by package texlive-xdvi-2009-22.84.16.14545.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2009 is needed by package texlive-hyperref-2009-6.78q.13530.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-tetex-bin = 2009 is needed by package texlive-amsfonts-2009-3.0.14555.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-kpathsea-bin = 2009 is needed by package texlive-psnfss-2009-9.2a.13822.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-kpathsea-bin = 2009 is needed by package texlive-amsrefs-2009-2.02.13530.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-kpathsea-bin = 2009 is needed by package texlive-tex-2009-13822.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-kpathsea-bin = 2009 is needed by package texlive-latex-2009-14246.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-kpathsea-bin = 2009 is needed by package texlive-luatex-2009-0.2.14210.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2009 is needed by package texlive-plain-2009-3.141592653.14025.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2009 is needed by package texlive-texlive.infra-2009-14857.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-kpathsea-bin = 2009 is needed by package texlive-etex-pkg-2009-2.0.13293.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2009 is needed by package texlive-collection-latex-2009-14245.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2009 is needed by package texlive-cm-2009-14055.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-kpathsea-bin = 2009 is needed by package texlive-ifxetex-2009-0.5.13293.fc11.noarch (texlive)
Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:40:25PM +0100, José Matos wrote: On Wednesday 26 August 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote: Hi, first off, thanks many people who sent me RFE and bugfix proposals. I've tried to fix most of them in the current package set in the testing repository: rpm -i http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2009-0.1.fc11.noarch. rpm Thanks, Jindrich Hi, I have tried to update and now most of the previous problems have been solved but there is a new type of problem that has appeared. I get lots of these: Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2009 is needed by package texlive- amsfonts-2009-3.0.14555.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-texconfig-bin = 2009 is needed by package texlive-texconfig-2009-13822.fc11.noarch (texlive) I send attached the full list that I get. It is likely caused by old metadata you have in the yum cache, or you were lucky to update just in the time I have been syncing the repository ;) Could you please yum clean all and try again? Jindrich -- José Abílio Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-dvipdfm-bin = 2009 is needed by package texlive-dvipdfm-2009-0.13.2d.14549.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2009 is needed by package texlive-etex-2009-13530.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2009 is needed by package texlive-metafont-2009-13822.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2009 is needed by package texlive-geometry-2009-4.2.13293.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-kpathsea-bin = 2009 is needed by package texlive-babel-2009-3.8l.13530.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2009 is needed by package texlive-mfware-2009-13822.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2009 is needed by package texlive-texconfig-2009-13822.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-dvips = 2007-42.fc11 is needed by package texlive-utils-2007-42.fc11.i586 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2009 is needed by package texlive-pdftex-2009-1.40.9.14549.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-kpathsea-bin = 2009 is needed by package texlive-ifluatex-2009-1.2.14365.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-kpathsea-bin = 2009 is needed by package texlive-glyphlist-2009-13293.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2009 is needed by package texlive-ifluatex-2009-1.2.14365.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-kpathsea-bin = 2009 is needed by package texlive-texconfig-2009-13822.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-kpathsea-bin = 2009 is needed by package texlive-tetex-2009-3.0.14841.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2009 is needed by package texlive-dvipdfmx-2009-14829.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2009 is needed by package texlive-ifxetex-2009-0.5.13293.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2009 is needed by package texlive-xdvi-2009-22.84.16.14545.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2009 is needed by package texlive-hyperref-2009-6.78q.13530.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-tetex-bin = 2009 is needed by package texlive-amsfonts-2009-3.0.14555.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-kpathsea-bin = 2009 is needed by package texlive-psnfss-2009-9.2a.13822.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-kpathsea-bin = 2009 is needed by package texlive-amsrefs-2009-2.02.13530.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-kpathsea-bin = 2009 is needed by package texlive-tex-2009-13822.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-kpathsea-bin = 2009 is needed by package texlive-latex-2009-14246.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-kpathsea-bin = 2009 is needed by package texlive-luatex-2009-0.2.14210.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2009 is needed by package texlive-plain-2009-3.141592653.14025.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2009 is needed by package texlive-texlive.infra-2009-14857.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-kpathsea-bin = 2009 is needed by package texlive-etex-pkg-2009-2.0.13293.fc11.noarch (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2009 is needed by package
Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 02:09:59PM -0400, Neal Becker wrote: Error: Missing Dependency: tetex-fonts is needed by package a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: tetex = 3.0 is needed by package jadetex-3.13-5.fc11.noarch (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: tetex is needed by package texinfo- tex-4.13a-2.fc11.x86_64 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: libkpathsea.so.4()(64bit) is needed by package evince-dvi-2.26.2-1.fc11.x86_64 (installed) Suggestions? I have succeessfully reproduced the a2ps problem and I'm still not sure about a solution. Installing texlive and a2ps in separate transactions worked for me fine without any depsolving problems. So you can use at least this workaround. Installation of jadetex should now be fixed now as well as texinfo-tex. The evince-dvi is unfortunately unfixable because it needs rebuild for the increased libkpathsea soname. Jindrich Jindrich Novy wrote: Hi, first off, thanks many people who sent me RFE and bugfix proposals. I've tried to fix most of them in the current package set in the testing repository: rpm -i http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive- release-2009-0.1.fc11.noarch.rpm If you use the older TeX Live 2009 packages, please reinstall them completely: yum remove texlive (and to be sure rm -rf /usr/share/texlive, due to ordering it could leave some directories there) yum clean all yum install texlive or other packages The reason for it is the following list of improvements: - binary packages do no more have the '.ARCH' postfix, the postfix changed to '-bin' - new font support add new 'fedora-fonts' packages which allows you to use TeX Live 2009 fonts (TrueType and OpenType for now) in Fedora - packages for TeX Live t1utils and psutils are no more built but dependencies to existing utilities in Fedora are added - kpathsea packages should now be correctly obsoleted. The lcdf-typetools dep errors you might see installing texlive-collection-fontutils is caused by the fact that lcdf-typetools in Fedora is linked against kpathsea libraries and TeX Live 2009 increases the soname so lcdf-typetools will work after rebuilt with the new kpathsea - fixed texlive-xetex conflict with older TL2007 packages - added older tetex-latex, etc. provides for compatibility (you are now able to install TL2009 together with R analysis package, etc.) - new packages should automatically clear /var/lib/texmf in %post scriptlets to avoid format incompatibilities I haven't added obsoletes to .ARCH packages to keep spes files readable and because TL2009 packages are not yet imported. The spec format should be final now. Only some font formats can be added or the Fedora font support updated for a bit. I will announce next repo updates here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Features/TeXLive Thanks, Jindrich -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:02:18 +0200 Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com wrote: JN - kpathsea packages should now be correctly obsoleted. The JN lcdf-typetools dep errors you might see installing JN texlive-collection-fontutils is caused by the fact that JN lcdf-typetools in Fedora is linked against kpathsea libraries and JN TeX Live 2009 increases the soname so lcdf-typetools will work JN after rebuilt with the new kpathsea Trying to do an update on F11 (586) today. It still caused: dvipdfm-0.13.2d-40.fc11.i586 von installed hat Abhängigkeitsauflöse-Probleme -- Fehlende Abhängigkeit: libkpathsea.so.4 wird benötigt von Paket dvipdfm-0.13.2d-40.fc11.i586 (installed) Fehler: Fehlende Abhängigkeit: libkpathsea.so.4 wird benötigt von Paket dvipdfm-0.13.2d-40.fc11.i586 (installed) (sorry for the German) So dvipdfm seems not to be obsoleted by texlive-dvipdfm... Stefan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
Hi, first off, thanks many people who sent me RFE and bugfix proposals. I've tried to fix most of them in the current package set in the testing repository: rpm -i http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2009-0.1.fc11.noarch.rpm If you use the older TeX Live 2009 packages, please reinstall them completely: yum remove texlive (and to be sure rm -rf /usr/share/texlive, due to ordering it could leave some directories there) yum clean all yum install texlive or other packages The reason for it is the following list of improvements: - binary packages do no more have the '.ARCH' postfix, the postfix changed to '-bin' - new font support add new 'fedora-fonts' packages which allows you to use TeX Live 2009 fonts (TrueType and OpenType for now) in Fedora - packages for TeX Live t1utils and psutils are no more built but dependencies to existing utilities in Fedora are added - kpathsea packages should now be correctly obsoleted. The lcdf-typetools dep errors you might see installing texlive-collection-fontutils is caused by the fact that lcdf-typetools in Fedora is linked against kpathsea libraries and TeX Live 2009 increases the soname so lcdf-typetools will work after rebuilt with the new kpathsea - fixed texlive-xetex conflict with older TL2007 packages - added older tetex-latex, etc. provides for compatibility (you are now able to install TL2009 together with R analysis package, etc.) - new packages should automatically clear /var/lib/texmf in %post scriptlets to avoid format incompatibilities I haven't added obsoletes to .ARCH packages to keep spes files readable and because TL2009 packages are not yet imported. The spec format should be final now. Only some font formats can be added or the Fedora font support updated for a bit. I will announce next repo updates here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Features/TeXLive Thanks, Jindrich -- Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
