Re: evolution header: Mime-version: 1.0
Am Mittwoch, den 03.06.2009, 10:09 -0700 schrieb Johannes Erdfelt: On Wed, Jun 03, 2009, Christoph Höger choe...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote: I see a small problem with evolution when sending to mailinglists. Obviously evolution puts: Mime-version: 1.0 in the header, hypermail searches for MIME-version: and cannot find that string. So it adds it. In turn my mail provider bounces the return message that should be sent to me complaining about duplicate header field. So who is wrong here? Hypermail or evolution? Is non uppercase letter Mime-version allowed? Anyone knowing the answer? Hypermail. Headers should be matched in a case insensitive manner. JE Where do you get that conclusion from? I can only cite RFC 2045 which says: Messages composed in accordance with this document MUST include such a header field, with the following verbatim text: MIME-Version: 1.0 signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: evolution header: Mime-version: 1.0
Am Donnerstag, den 04.06.2009, 09:30 +0200 schrieb Christoph Höger: Am Mittwoch, den 03.06.2009, 10:09 -0700 schrieb Johannes Erdfelt: On Wed, Jun 03, 2009, Christoph Höger choe...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote: I see a small problem with evolution when sending to mailinglists. Obviously evolution puts: Mime-version: 1.0 in the header, hypermail searches for MIME-version: and cannot find that string. So it adds it. In turn my mail provider bounces the return message that should be sent to me complaining about duplicate header field. So who is wrong here? Hypermail or evolution? Is non uppercase letter Mime-version allowed? Anyone knowing the answer? Hypermail. Headers should be matched in a case insensitive manner. JE Where do you get that conclusion from? I can only cite RFC 2045 which says: Messages composed in accordance with this document MUST include such a header field, with the following verbatim text: MIME-Version: 1.0 Found RFC 5234 myself. Thanks. signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
evolution header: Mime-version: 1.0
Hi folks, I see a small problem with evolution when sending to mailinglists. Obviously evolution puts: Mime-version: 1.0 in the header, hypermail searches for MIME-version: and cannot find that string. So it adds it. In turn my mail provider bounces the return message that should be sent to me complaining about duplicate header field. So who is wrong here? Hypermail or evolution? Is non uppercase letter Mime-version allowed? Anyone knowing the answer? thanks christoph signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
