RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Problem with solaris & FDS authentication
Yes it would be a superset containing schema definitions of DUAConfigProfile and nisDomain attributes and objectclasses, ONLY if you have run "idsconfig". When I first tried configuring Solaris8 LDAP Client against FDS I copied over the 99user.ldif from SUN iDS install, and it actually worked. BUT the point is, as George and Rich had pointed up to me in https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/2005-July/msg0013 8.html is that 99user.ldif may contain all other "customized" schema changes and it is not "proper" to just "blindly copy over" and overwrite the original 99user.ldif of FDS7.1. Looks like you did not perform a fresh re-install of FDS and went from there, make sure you stop slapd and admin server, "rm -f /opt/fedora-ds" and re-install from scratch using static IP for your Solaris8 LDAP Client running OpenSSH server, you may follow my revised HOW-TO: http://web.singnet.com.sg/~garyttt/Configuring%20Solaris%20Native%20LDAP %20Client%20for%20Fedora%20Directory%20Server.htm Gary -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Igor Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 11:49 PM To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. Subject: RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Problem with solaris & FDS authentication > === > GT: Did you have 61DUAConfigFile.ldif and 62nisDomain.ldif added to > config/schema (and slapd restarted)? They provides all the required > attributes for DUAConfigProfile and nisDomain objects including SSD > (serviceSearchDescriptor). We try not to touch 99user.ldif and the > original 99user.ldif should have a file size of 1321. No, I got the 99user.ldif from an iDS install. I thought it is a superset of 61dua & 62nis LDIFs? Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs -- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users -- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
[Fedora-directory-users] FDS/Samba and password sync
I would like to ask the people who are using the Fedora Directory Server as a backend LDAP server to a Samba PDC to see what happens when a user changes a password from the ctrl+alt+del dialog in Windows. (with 'ldap passwd sync = Yes' in smb.conf) This did not work for me the last time I tried FDS (last June) only the Samba related password fields (SambaLMPassword/SambaNTPassword) are changed and not the userPassword field. See this thread: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/2005-June/msg00092.html So I'm kinda curious to see if someone has gotten this to work. -- Sævaldur Arnar Gunnarsson ; RHCE -- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
Re: [Fedora-directory-users] user-defined vs. standard schema files
George Holbert wrote: I've copied some custom schema files to the config/schema directory. In the Java console, some of the attributes and objectclasses defined in the custom schema files show up under "Standard", while others show up in "User Defined." Does anyone know how FDS determines that an attribute or objectclass is "standard" vs. "user-defined"? I would think everything that is defined in a custom schema file would show up in "user-defined." We use the X-ORIGIN schema extension with a value of 'user defined'. "user-defined" really means "schema that was added over LDAP or using the console that's stored in 99user.ldif". Not sure that this really matters much, but just curious. Thanks, -- George -- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
[Fedora-directory-users] user-defined vs. standard schema files
I've copied some custom schema files to the config/schema directory. In the Java console, some of the attributes and objectclasses defined in the custom schema files show up under "Standard", while others show up in "User Defined." Does anyone know how FDS determines that an attribute or objectclass is "standard" vs. "user-defined"? I would think everything that is defined in a custom schema file would show up in "user-defined." Not sure that this really matters much, but just curious. Thanks, -- George -- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Problem with solaris & FDS authentication
> === > GT: Did you have 61DUAConfigFile.ldif and 62nisDomain.ldif added to > config/schema (and slapd restarted)? They provides all the required > attributes for DUAConfigProfile and nisDomain objects including SSD > (serviceSearchDescriptor). We try not to touch 99user.ldif and the > original 99user.ldif should have a file size of 1321. No, I got the 99user.ldif from an iDS install. I thought it is a superset of 61dua & 62nis LDIFs? Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs -- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
