Re: [Fedora-directory-users] user-defined vs. standard schema files

2005-09-01 Thread Rich Megginson 

George Holbert wrote:

I've copied some custom schema files to the config/schema directory.  
In the Java console, some of the attributes and objectclasses defined 
in the custom schema files show up under "Standard", while others show 
up in "User Defined."


Does anyone know how FDS determines that an attribute or objectclass 
is "standard" vs. "user-defined"?  I would think everything that is 
defined in a custom schema file would show up in "user-defined."


We use the X-ORIGIN schema extension with a value of 'user defined'.  
"user-defined" really means "schema that was added over LDAP or using 
the console that's stored in 99user.ldif".




Not sure that this really matters much, but just curious.

Thanks,
-- George


--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

[Fedora-directory-users] user-defined vs. standard schema files

2005-09-01 Thread George Holbert 
I've copied some custom schema files to the config/schema directory.  In 
the Java console, some of the attributes and objectclasses defined in 
the custom schema files show up under "Standard", while others show up 
in "User Defined."


Does anyone know how FDS determines that an attribute or objectclass is 
"standard" vs. "user-defined"?  I would think everything that is defined 
in a custom schema file would show up in "user-defined."


Not sure that this really matters much, but just curious.

Thanks,
-- George


--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users