[Bug 454128] Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org

2008-07-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-07-19 01:26 EST ---
I think that isn't the packagers real name, and I thought the CLA didn't permit
anonymous contributions.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 454175] Review Request: gfs-nicefore-fonts - GFS Nicefore majuscule Greek font

2008-07-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gfs-nicefore-fonts - GFS Nicefore majuscule Greek font


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454175


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 261881] Review Request: ecolier-court- fonts - Ãcolier court fonts

2008-07-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ecolier-court-fonts - Écolier court fonts


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 261881] Review Request: ecolier-court- fonts - Ãcolier court fonts

2008-07-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ecolier-court-fonts - Écolier court fonts


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-07-18 19:55 EST ---

OK  | MUST: rpmlint is clean
OK  | MUST: The package must be named according to the Package…
OK  | MUST: The spec file name must match the base package…
OK  | MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines…
OK  | MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved…
OK  | MUST: The License field in the package spec file must…
OK  | MUST: Packaged detached license and specified in %doc
OK  | MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
OK  | MUST: The package must successfully compile and build…
OK  | MUST: successfully compile, build 
OK  | MUST: All build dependencies must be listed…
OK  | MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates
OK  | MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files 
OK  | MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. 
OK  | MUST: Each package must have a %clean section
OK  | MUST: Each package must consistently use macros
OK  | MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible 
OK  | MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already
OK  | MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST…
OK  | MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
OK  | SHOULD: If the source package does not include license 
OK  | SHOULD: The description and summary section … translations…
OK  | SHOULD: The package builds in mock
OK  | SHOULD: The package builds on all supported architectures
OK  | SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package…
OK  | SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane…

Please fix the typos: licence and traditionnal before you commit. The UTF-8
details have been hashed out already and I don't have much to add. I don't
understand French and can't read the text file provided but I see the reference
to OFL. Perhaps you should add a README.dist and include a note in English too?
Probably not needed as the fonts are useful only for French folks.

APPROVED


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 261881] Review Request: ecolier-court- fonts - Ãcolier court fonts

2008-07-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ecolier-court-fonts - Écolier court fonts


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Flag||fedora-review?




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 454176] Review Request: gfs-jackson-fonts - GFS Jackson majuscule Greek font

2008-07-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gfs-jackson-fonts - GFS Jackson majuscule Greek font


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454176


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-07-18 19:34 EST ---

OK  | MUST: rpmlint is clean
OK  | MUST: The package must be named according to the Package…
OK  | MUST: The spec file name must match the base package…
OK  | MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines…
OK  | MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved…
OK  | MUST: The License field in the package spec file must…
OK  | MUST: Packaged detached license and specified in %doc
OK  | MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
OK  | MUST: The package must successfully compile and build…
OK  | MUST: successfully compile, build 
OK  | MUST: All build dependencies must be listed…
OK  | MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates
OK  | MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files 
OK  | MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. 
OK  | MUST: Each package must have a %clean section
OK  | MUST: Each package must consistently use macros
OK  | MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible 
OK  | MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already
OK  | MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST…
OK  | MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
OK  | SHOULD: If the source package does not include license 
OK  | SHOULD: The description and summary section … translations…
OK  | SHOULD: The package builds in mock
OK  | SHOULD: The package builds on all supported architectures
OK  | SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package…
OK  | SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane…

APPROVED


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 454176] Review Request: gfs-jackson-fonts - GFS Jackson majuscule Greek font

2008-07-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gfs-jackson-fonts - GFS Jackson majuscule Greek font


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454176


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 454176] Review Request: gfs-jackson-fonts - GFS Jackson majuscule Greek font

2008-07-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gfs-jackson-fonts - GFS Jackson majuscule Greek font


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454176


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-review?




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 454175] Review Request: gfs-nicefore-fonts - GFS Nicefore majuscule Greek font

2008-07-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gfs-nicefore-fonts - GFS Nicefore majuscule Greek font


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454175





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-07-18 17:35 EST ---

OK  | MUST: rpmlint is clean
OK  | MUST: The package must be named according to the Package…

Shouldn't the font directory name be consistent? Under /usr/share/docs it is
gfs-nicecore-fonts and it is just called gfs-nicefore under /usr/share/fonts. I
suppose that is a matter of taste since font packages don't seem to follow any
particular convention here. 

OK  | MUST: The spec file name must match the base package…
OK  | MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines…
OK  | MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved…
OK  | MUST: The License field in the package spec file must…
OK  | MUST: Packaged detached license and specified in %doc
OK  | MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
OK  | MUST: The package must successfully compile and build…
OK  | MUST: successfully compile, build 
OK  | MUST: All build dependencies must be listed…
OK  | MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates
OK  | MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files 
OK  | MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. 
OK  | MUST: Each package must have a %clean section
OK  | MUST: Each package must consistently use macros
OK  | MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible 
OK  | MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already
OK  | MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST…
OK  | MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
OK  | SHOULD: If the source package does not include license 
OK  | SHOULD: The description and summary section … translations…
OK  | SHOULD: The package builds in mock
OK  | SHOULD: The package builds on all supported architectures
OK  | SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package…
OK  | SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane…

APPROVED


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 454175] Review Request: gfs-nicefore-fonts - GFS Nicefore majuscule Greek font

2008-07-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gfs-nicefore-fonts - GFS Nicefore majuscule Greek font


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454175


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Flag||fedora-review?




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 454967] Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape.

2008-07-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline 
font of unusual shape.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454967


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-07-18 17:27 EST ---
I would recommend following the standard template specified at 

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Annotated_fonts_spec_template

It would ease the review process quite a bit if you follow that which is always
a good thing.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 454128] Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org

2008-07-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-07-18 17:06 EST ---

Fix the rpmlint warnings. While the mixed tab and spacing warnings are less
serious, the permissions are definitely wrong. 

srpm:

thibault-fonts.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 
12)
thibault-fonts.src: W: strange-permission Essays1743-1.0-ttf.tar.gz 0777
thibault-fonts.src: W: strange-permission Rockets-ttf.tar.gz 0777
thibault-fonts.src: W: strange-permission StayPuft.tar.gz 0777
thibault-fonts.src: W: strange-permission Isabella.tar.gz 0777
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.

Spec file:

thibault-fonts.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 
12)
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

OK  | MUST: The package must be named according to the Package…
OK  | MUST: The spec file name must match the base package…
OK  | MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines…
OK  | MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved…
OK  | MUST: The License field in the package spec file must…
OK  | MUST: Packaged detached license and specified in %doc
OK  | MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
OK  | MUST: The package must successfully compile and build…
OK  | MUST: successfully compile, build 
OK  | MUST: All build dependencies must be listed…
OK  | MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates
OK  | MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files 

NOK  | MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. 

Please fix the incorrect permissions 

OK  | MUST: Each package must have a %clean section
OK  | MUST: Each package must consistently use macros
OK  | MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible 

OK  | MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already
OK  | MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST…
OK  | MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
OK  | SHOULD: If the source package does not include license 
OK  | SHOULD: The description and summary section … translations…
OK  | SHOULD: The package builds in mock
OK  | SHOULD: The package builds on all supported architectures
OK  | SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package…
OK  | SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane…

Add a font config file as described in 

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Annotated_fonts_spec_template

and in
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips





-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 454128] Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org

2008-07-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Flag|fedora-review-  |fedora-review?




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Issue 88613] Canvas: cairo-based font rendering

2008-07-18 Thread mox
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88613





--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 18 20:01:42 + 
2008 ---
The work of this bug continues in cws cairocanvastext01.

The cws now has working cairo canvas text for X11, Mac OS X/Quartz and
(hopefully) Windows.

The rendering is not 100% perfect, but several problems are actually due to VCL
backends and/or canvas implementation, not the cairo text rendering.

The internal VCL API is NOT exposed anymore. Instead, a platform independent
glyph layout array + font id is passed to canvas, as described in
vcl/inc/vcl/sysdata.hxx.


-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


rpms/padauk-fonts/F-8 padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf,NONE,1.1

2008-07-18 Thread Minto Joseph
Author: mintojoseph

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/padauk-fonts/F-8
In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6314

Added Files:
padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf 
Log Message:
add conf file



--- NEW FILE padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf ---



  
Padauk

  sans-serif

  
  
sans-serif

  Padauk

  


___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


rpms/padauk-fonts/F-9 padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf,NONE,1.1

2008-07-18 Thread Minto Joseph
Author: mintojoseph

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/padauk-fonts/F-9
In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6185

Added Files:
padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf 
Log Message:
add conf file



--- NEW FILE padauk-fonts-fontconfig.conf ---



  
Padauk

  sans-serif

  
  
sans-serif

  Padauk

  


___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


rpms/padauk-fonts/F-8 padauk-fonts.spec,NONE,1.1 sources,1.1,1.2

2008-07-18 Thread Minto Joseph
Author: mintojoseph

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/padauk-fonts/F-8
In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6049

Modified Files:
sources 
Added Files:
padauk-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
initial commit



--- NEW FILE padauk-fonts.spec ---
%define fontnamepadauk
%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname}
%define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d

%define archivename ttf-sil-padauk-2.4

Name:%{fontname}-fonts
Version: 2.4
Release: 2%{?dist}
Summary: Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script

Group:   User Interface/X
License: OFL
URL: http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&id=Padauk
# The source link is a redirect and is not directly accessible
Source0: %{archivename}.tar.gz
Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf

BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XX)
BuildArch: noarch

%description
Padauk is a Myanmar font covering all currently used characters
in the Myanmar block.The font aims to cover all minority language needs.
At the moment, these do not extend to stylistic variation needs.
The font is a smart font using a Graphite description.


%prep
%setup -q -c
for txt in doc/*.txt ; do
   fold -s $txt > $txt.new
   sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new
   touch -r $txt $txt.new
   mv $txt.new $txt
done


%build
# Nothing there


%install
rm -fr %{buildroot}

install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir}
install -m 0644 -p font-source/*.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir}

install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}/65-%{fontname}.conf


%clean
rm -fr %{buildroot}


%post
if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then
%{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || :
fi


%postun
if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then
%{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || :
fi


%files
%defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
%doc doc/*.txt

%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/65-%{fontname}.conf

%dir %{fontdir}/
%{fontdir}/*.ttf


%changelog
* Fri Jul 15 2008 Minto Joseph  - 2.4-2
- Changed setup macro and fontconfig rules
- Changed fontconfig prefix


* Fri Jul 15 2008 Minto Joseph  - 2.4-1
- Changed versioning
- Added configuration file
- Added more description
- Added license file

* Fri Jul 11 2008 Minto Joseph  - 20080617-1
- initial package


Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/padauk-fonts/F-8/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources 15 Jul 2008 22:11:11 -  1.1
+++ sources 18 Jul 2008 14:25:33 -  1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+f328e367efc7425d7b161d1c287d8caa  ttf-sil-padauk-2.4.tar.gz

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


rpms/padauk-fonts/F-9 sources,1.1,1.2

2008-07-18 Thread Minto Joseph
Author: mintojoseph

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/padauk-fonts/F-9
In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5856

Modified Files:
sources 
Log Message:
update source



Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/padauk-fonts/F-9/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources 15 Jul 2008 22:11:11 -  1.1
+++ sources 18 Jul 2008 14:22:28 -  1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+f328e367efc7425d7b161d1c287d8caa  ttf-sil-padauk-2.4.tar.gz

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


rpms/padauk-fonts/F-9 padauk-fonts.spec,NONE,1.1

2008-07-18 Thread Minto Joseph
Author: mintojoseph

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/padauk-fonts/F-9
In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5724

Added Files:
padauk-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Initial



--- NEW FILE padauk-fonts.spec ---
%define fontnamepadauk
%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname}
%define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d

%define archivename ttf-sil-padauk-2.4

Name:%{fontname}-fonts
Version: 2.4
Release: 2%{?dist}
Summary: Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script

Group:   User Interface/X
License: OFL
URL: http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&id=Padauk
# The source link is a redirect and is not directly accessible
Source0: %{archivename}.tar.gz
Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf

BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XX)
BuildArch: noarch

%description
Padauk is a Myanmar font covering all currently used characters
in the Myanmar block.The font aims to cover all minority language needs.
At the moment, these do not extend to stylistic variation needs.
The font is a smart font using a Graphite description.


%prep
%setup -q -c
for txt in doc/*.txt ; do
   fold -s $txt > $txt.new
   sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new
   touch -r $txt $txt.new
   mv $txt.new $txt
done


%build
# Nothing there


%install
rm -fr %{buildroot}

install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir}
install -m 0644 -p font-source/*.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir}

install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}/65-%{fontname}.conf


%clean
rm -fr %{buildroot}


%post
if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then
%{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || :
fi


%postun
if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then
%{_bindir}/fc-cache %{fontdir} || :
fi


%files
%defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
%doc doc/*.txt

%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/65-%{fontname}.conf

%dir %{fontdir}/
%{fontdir}/*.ttf


%changelog
* Fri Jul 15 2008 Minto Joseph  - 2.4-2
- Changed setup macro and fontconfig rules
- Changed fontconfig prefix


* Fri Jul 15 2008 Minto Joseph  - 2.4-1
- Changed versioning
- Added configuration file
- Added more description
- Added license file

* Fri Jul 11 2008 Minto Joseph  - 20080617-1
- initial package

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 453077] fonts-indic is deprecated and should be removed

2008-07-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: fonts-indic is deprecated and should be removed


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453077


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 453081] fonts-sinhala is deprecated and should be removed

2008-07-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: fonts-sinhala is deprecated and should be removed


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453081


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


rpms/edrip-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.6, 1.7 edrip-fonts.spec, 1.9, 1.10 import.log, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.6, 1.7

2008-07-18 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/edrip-fonts/devel
In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10058/devel

Modified Files:
.cvsignore edrip-fonts.spec import.log sources 
Log Message:
some more coverage 𐅇


Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/edrip-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- .cvsignore  11 Jul 2008 20:32:04 -  1.6
+++ .cvsignore  18 Jul 2008 08:10:03 -  1.7
@@ -1 +1 @@
-edrip-src-20080710.tar.bz2
+edrip-src-20080717.tar.bz2


Index: edrip-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/edrip-fonts/devel/edrip-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10
--- edrip-fonts.spec11 Jul 2008 20:32:04 -  1.9
+++ edrip-fonts.spec18 Jul 2008 08:10:03 -  1.10
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 %define archivename %{fontname}-src-%{version}
 
 Name:%{fontname}-fonts
-Version: 20080710
+Version: 20080717
 Release: 1%{?dist}
 Summary: Edrip decorative font
 
@@ -75,6 +75,10 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Jul 17 2008 
+- 20080717-1
+𐅇 More cyrillic coverage
+
 * Fri Jul 11 2008 
 - 20080710-1
 ⌖ Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup


Index: import.log
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/edrip-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- import.log  11 Jul 2008 20:32:04 -  1.1
+++ import.log  18 Jul 2008 08:10:03 -  1.2
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 edrip-fonts-20080710-1_fc10:HEAD:edrip-fonts-20080710-1.fc10.src.rpm:1215808287
+edrip-fonts-20080717-1_fc10_nim:HEAD:edrip-fonts-20080717-1.fc10.nim.src.rpm:1216368564


Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/edrip-fonts/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- sources 11 Jul 2008 20:32:04 -  1.6
+++ sources 18 Jul 2008 08:10:03 -  1.7
@@ -1 +1 @@
-e450ea109fb70d2ca337cdbf3d57ec63  edrip-src-20080710.tar.bz2
+22887d7871edef64ccc67b7e0107050f  edrip-src-20080717.tar.bz2

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list