[Issue 79878] OO.o can not select modern font faces conveniently
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878 User dtardon changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment is patch| |Created an attachment (id= | |56164) Independent selecti | |on of Posture/Weight/Stret | |ch in Format->Character di | |alog --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 3 07:24:40 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=56164) Independent selection of Posture/Weight/Stretch in Format->Character dialog - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 79878] OO.o can not select modern font faces conveniently
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 3 07:52:50 + 2008 --- Some comments to the previous patch: It is a first try, only to get it working; it should be fully working, though. It's for West lang. group only--if you have enabled Asian or CTL lang. groups, you will see nothing new... I've used list-boxes for the new controls (Posture/Weight/Stretch); they are refilled after each change of Font Family, where each of them gets assigned all values of the particular attribute that Family contains. That implies it's possible to select combination which has no real counterpart in font file. There are two another ways to solve the filling and the chosen one is somewhere between them: 1. The controls contains always all possible values for each of them (i.e. Normal/Italic/Oblique for Posture). 2. The controls are updated on change in any of them to reflect only allowed combinations--this would be no change to current state. Oh, and to apply the patch requires all my previous patches have been applied as well. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 79878] OO.o can not select modern font faces conveniently
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 3 08:01:26 + 2008 --- A question to anyone acquainted with Asian/CTL fonts: Is there anything as font-stretch in use in these fonts? If there is, then there is a need for specific SIDs, controls and XML attributes for them as well. I haven't found any positive evidence of it, but maybe someone knows better... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 79878] OO.o can not select modern font faces conveniently
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'belegdol,beppec56,cmc,fed|'belegdol,beppec56,cmc,fed |orafonts,hdu,khirano,mba,m|orafonts,hdu,khirano,mba,m |eywer,norbusan,ralphie,ren|eywer,norbusan,ralphie,ren |e,thb'|e,thb,tora' --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 3 08:48:12 + 2008 --- > Is there anything as font-stretch in use in these [CJK-]fonts? Many CJK fonts come in two variants: monospaced and proportional Calling this attribute "font-stretch" is a bit of a stretch though... in this case the other commonly terms "proportion" or pitch" are more appropriate @tora/@khirano: are you aware of any CJK font families that have other pitch-variants than monospaced or proportional, e.g. condensed or expanded? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 79878] OO.o can not select modern font faces conveniently
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878 User dtardon changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'belegdol,beppec56,cmc,fed|'belegdol,beppec56,cmc,dta |orafonts,hdu,khirano,mba,m|rdon,fedorafonts,hdu,khira |eywer,norbusan,ralphie,ren|no,mba,meywer,norbusan,ral |e,thb,tora' |phie,rene,thb,tora' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 79878] OO.o can not select modern font faces conveniently
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878 User mba changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|mba |os Issue type|ENHANCEMENT |PATCH Target milestone|--- |OOo 3.1 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 3 10:18:19 + 2008 --- Wow! I was on vacation for three weeks and when I came back I saw a huge patch attached. Great. :-) Thanks for the patch. It will take some time to review it, I hope we can do this in the 3.1 time frame, at least we will try. Oliver, please take over. I'm sure that Herbert can help with the VCL part if necessary. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 79878] OO.o can not select modern font faces conveniently
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 3 11:10:36 + 2008 --- btw, since you only seem to speak about font stretch and weight, don't forget there are other possibilities. Many Adobe fonts have an "outline" style for example, or have "text", "caption" and "subhead" styles. And there are other possibilities. That means two or more styles in the same family with the same weight, stretch and slant. Also, please don't magically change the style names, so keep the original names as defined in the font, and not some interpreted version from the numbers in the font which will confuse people and will give problems in the case above. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 461039] liberation-fonts >=1.04.2 have problems with some websites
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461039 --- Comment #1 from Pacho Ramos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-03 12:04:44 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=315658) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=315658) wrong.png -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 461039] New: liberation-fonts >=1.04.2 have problems with some websites
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: liberation-fonts >=1.04.2 have problems with some websites https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461039 Summary: liberation-fonts >=1.04.2 have problems with some websites Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=315657) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=315657) good.png Description of problem: At first, I am using liberation fonts on a Gentoo system, I have already tried to send this to https://fedorahosted.org/liberation-fonts/wiki but I am unable to login succesfully. I am using epiphany-2.22.3 built against xulrunner-1.8 and gnome-2.22, I have tried with "Sans" and "liberation sans" fonts, both with the same problem (and with size 10) Gentoo ships an old set of liberation fonts (seems to really be liberation-fonts-0.2) but they work FINE with most of websites (at least, all I have tried), then, I have updated to 1.04.2 (and later to 1.04.90 with the same problem) and I have started to have problems with sites like: http://elmundo.es/ I can reproduce this problem always, if I put the mouse pointer over a link bellow first titular (their size is a bit smaller than fist titular) only part of text is underlined, other part not I attach two screenshots showing proper (with old liberation-fonts) and unproper behavior (with new) This also occurs, for example, with: http://www.lavozdeasturias.es/ http://elperiodico.com/ Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.04.2 or superior How reproducible: Simply try to move mouse over links in mentioned webpages (not all links fail, maybe it could be related with size) Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 459451] Changes in glyph point settings window could not be applied.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459451 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-03 16:18:40 EDT --- Happily, this patch seems to be already applied in the latest upstream version which I have just built in rawhide. ;) Did you need this update in f9 as well? We try and not update fontforge in stable releases because fonts might also then need updating, leading to a lot of churn and problem. ;( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 460668] Add requires on autotrace to auto-enable element->autotrace
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460668 Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-03 16:18:44 EDT --- Yeah, it's a small dep, it sounds fine to just require it. Done and built into rawhide. Thanks for the report! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 79878] OO.o can not select modern font faces conveniently
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 3 20:32:52 + 2008 --- tora->hdu: Thank you for giving us a chance to comment some. In sum, Japanese fonts, in general, do not use terms such as condense or oblique. They uses wight, instead. Microsoft Office Japanese uses traditional font faces: regular, bold, italic, and bold italic. Professional users from such as publishing use lots of fonts which are normally decorated with weight. For such users, artificial bold seems not a choice. They simply uses heavier wight of fonts, instead. Either italic or italic bold is probably not applied for Japanese characters and is not typically used for publishing. Both italic and italic bold are normally applied for Western letters. For historical reasons, Japanese often uses both Japanese characters and Western letters in a single document. For Japanese, many fonts are available: - Fonts embedded in Windows - Fonts released by font vendors, for professional use - Freely available fonts Fonts samples embedded in Windows Japanese and 2007 Microsoft Office System Japanese. Snapshots are available in the following web page: http://office.microsoft.com/ja-jp/2007/FX102141601041.aspx The first 5 fonts (MS UI Gothic to MS Pxx) in the web page are the fundamental fonts of Windows Japanese that are available from Windows 9x to Vista. Their font names begin with two letters 'MS.' The rests are the fonts that are accompanied with the Office System. Their font names begin with two letters 'HG.' Naming conventions MS [P]FontFamilyName none: Monotype (fixed width) P: Western proportional letter and Asian proportional character HG[P|S] FontFamilyName HG: The font vendor seems to add this two letters at the beginning none: Monotype (fixed width) P: Western proportional letter and Asian proportional character S: Western proportional letter and Asian monotype character Bold and Italic It seems that Windows is capable of rendering artificial bold and/or italic glyph. For font family メイリオ embedded in Windows Vista Japanese is ClearType and probably has four font faces. http://www.akibatec.net/wabunfont/library/windowsos/windowsos.html Many font vendors offer fonts files for professional use. Motoya co., ltd. http://www.motoyafont.jp/font_sample.html Naming conventions VendorName FontFamilyName # #: number that denotes weight. The smaller, thinner; the bigger, thicker. Morisawa & Company Ltd. http://www.morisawa.co.jp/font/fontlist/ Naming conventions FontFamilyName [L｜R｜M｜B｜EB｜H｜EH｜U] e.g. http://www.morisawa.co.jp/font/fontlist/details/fontfamily001.html http://www.morisawa.co.jp/font/fontlist/details/fontfamily001_2.html http://www.morisawa.co.jp/font/fontlist/details/pdf/RyuminKL_Family.pdf DynaComware Corp. e.g. http://www.dynacw.co.jp/dynafont/fontface/pdf_data/sample_tt600w_v.pdf http://www.dynacw.co.jp/dynafont/fontface/pdf_data/sample_ot_p9.pdf Naming conventions VendorName FontFamilyName W# #: number that denotes weight. Useful web site that lists links for font vendors: http://www.akibatec.net/wabunfont/library.html Freely available fonts A web site listing freely available fonts: http://www.akibatec.net/wabunfont/freefont/freefont.html e.g. http://www.akibatec.net/wabunfont/freefont/pro1.html Naming conventions VendorName FontFamilyName W# #: number that denotes weight. http://www.akibatec.net/wabunfont/freefont/ama-d.html Major Linux distributions come with some Japanese fonts. Sazanami http://sourceforge.jp/projects/efont/ sazanami mincho and sazanami gothic solely have one font face. IPA http://ossipedia.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/ INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY PROMOTION AGENCY, JAPAN releases freely available fonts called IPA fonts, (not International Phonetic Alphabet), that resemble the fundamental five fonts of Windows Japanese. The fonts have been widely spread among Linux users. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/edrip-fonts/devel edrip-fonts.spec, 1.11, 1.12 import.log, 1.3, 1.4
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/edrip-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11954/devel
Modified Files:
edrip-fonts.spec import.log
Log Message:
rebuild with pre-F10-freeze fontforge
Index: edrip-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/edrip-fonts/devel/edrip-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.11
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -r1.11 -r1.12
--- edrip-fonts.spec1 Sep 2008 15:35:26 - 1.11
+++ edrip-fonts.spec3 Sep 2008 21:10:04 - 1.12
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
Name:%{fontname}-fonts
Version: 20080826
-Release: 1%{?dist}
+Release: 2%{?dist}
Summary: Edrip decorative font
Group: User Interface/X
@@ -75,6 +75,10 @@
%changelog
+* Wed Sep 3 2008
+- 20080826-2
+â Rebuild with pre-F10-freeze fontforge
+
* Mon Sep 1 2008
- 20080826-1
Ô¡ Still more extended cyrillic coverage
Index: import.log
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/edrip-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- import.log 1 Sep 2008 15:35:26 - 1.3
+++ import.log 3 Sep 2008 21:10:04 - 1.4
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
edrip-fonts-20080710-1_fc10:HEAD:edrip-fonts-20080710-1.fc10.src.rpm:1215808287
edrip-fonts-20080717-1_fc10_nim:HEAD:edrip-fonts-20080717-1.fc10.nim.src.rpm:1216368564
edrip-fonts-20080826-1_fc10_nim:HEAD:edrip-fonts-20080826-1.fc10.nim.src.rpm:1220283093
+edrip-fonts-20080826-2_fc10:HEAD:edrip-fonts-20080826-2.fc10.src.rpm:1220476184
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/fontforge/devel sources, 1.20, 1.21 .cvsignore, 1.20, 1.21 fontforge.spec, 1.34, 1.35
Author: kevin
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv672
Modified Files:
sources .cvsignore fontforge.spec
Log Message:
Upgrade to 20080828
Add Requires on autotrace. Fixes 460668
Confirm patch from 459451 is upstream here.
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.20
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -u -r1.20 -r1.21
--- sources 18 May 2008 16:17:11 - 1.20
+++ sources 3 Sep 2008 20:03:55 - 1.21
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-ca239de93aeceed08c26d0e898c8 fontforge_full-20080429.tar.bz2
-17def25d0a140a1e3359c0287d694bc6 fontforge_htdocs-20080429.tar.bz2
+3c232a6e412d8b443b0b881332dbc26c fontforge_full-20080828.tar.bz2
+5eee3058485b52208dfca1d46aeb96aa fontforge_htdocs-20080824.tar.bz2
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.20
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -u -r1.20 -r1.21
--- .cvsignore 18 May 2008 16:17:11 - 1.20
+++ .cvsignore 3 Sep 2008 20:03:55 - 1.21
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-fontforge_full-20080429.tar.bz2
-fontforge_htdocs-20080429.tar.bz2
+fontforge_full-20080828.tar.bz2
+fontforge_htdocs-20080824.tar.bz2
Index: fontforge.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel/fontforge.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.34
retrieving revision 1.35
diff -u -r1.34 -r1.35
--- fontforge.spec 18 May 2008 16:17:11 - 1.34
+++ fontforge.spec 3 Sep 2008 20:03:55 - 1.35
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
-%define docs_version 20080429
+%define docs_version 20080824
%define gettext_package FontForge
Name: fontforge
-Version:20080429
+Version:20080828
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Outline and bitmap font editor
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
Requires: xdg-utils
+Requires: autotrace
BuildRequires: libjpeg-devel
BuildRequires: libtiff-devel
@@ -58,8 +59,6 @@
chmod 644 htdocs/*.html
chmod 644 htdocs/*.png
rm -rf htdocs/flags/CVS
-mkdir cidmaps
-tar xzf htdocs/cidmaps.tgz -C cidmaps
# Fix bad line terminators
%{__sed} -i 's/\r//' htdocs/Big5.txt
@@ -77,7 +76,6 @@
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-install -p -m 644 cidmaps/Adobe* $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/fontforge
rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/libg{draw,unicode}.{la,so}
install -Dpm 644 htdocs/ffanvil32.png \
@@ -138,6 +136,11 @@
%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/*.pc
%changelog
+* Wed Sep 03 2008 Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - 20080828-1
+- Upgrade to 20080828
+- Add Requires on autotrace. Fixes 460668
+- Confirm patch from 459451 is upstream here.
+
* Fri May 16 2008 Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - 20080429-1
- Upgrade to 20080429
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel dejavu-fonts.spec, 1.85, 1.86 import.log, 1.2, 1.3
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13242/devel
Modified Files:
dejavu-fonts.spec import.log
Log Message:
rebuild with pre-F10-freeze fontforge
Index: dejavu-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/dejavu-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.85
retrieving revision 1.86
diff -u -r1.85 -r1.86
--- dejavu-fonts.spec 27 Jul 2008 13:35:50 - 1.85
+++ dejavu-fonts.spec 3 Sep 2008 21:17:02 - 1.86
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
Name:%{fontname}-fonts
Version: 2.26
-Release: 1%{?alphatag}%{?dist}
+Release: 2%{?alphatag}%{?dist}
Summary: DejaVu fonts, mature typefaces
Group: User Interface/X
@@ -176,6 +176,10 @@
%changelog
+* Wed Sep 3 2008 Nicolas Mailhot
+- 2.26-2
+â Rebuild with pre-F10-freeze fontforge
+
* Sun Jul 26 2008 Nicolas Mailhot
- 2.26-1
Ô² New release at last
Index: import.log
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- import.log 27 Jul 2008 13:35:50 - 1.2
+++ import.log 3 Sep 2008 21:17:02 - 1.3
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
dejavu-fonts-2_25-2_fc10:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.25-2.fc10.src.rpm:1215806350
dejavu-fonts-2_26-1_fc10:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-1.fc10.src.rpm:1217165726
+dejavu-fonts-2_26-2_fc10:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.src.rpm:1220476598
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/linux-libertine-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 linux-libertine-fonts.spec, 1.8, 1.9
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/linux-libertine-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14632/devel
Modified Files:
linux-libertine-fonts.spec
Added Files:
import.log
Log Message:
rebuild with pre-F10-freeze fontforge
--- NEW FILE import.log ---
linux-libertine-fonts-2_7_9-2_fc10:HEAD:linux-libertine-fonts-2.7.9-2.fc10.src.rpm:1220476988
Index: linux-libertine-fonts.spec
===
RCS file:
/cvs/extras/rpms/linux-libertine-fonts/devel/linux-libertine-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9
--- linux-libertine-fonts.spec 3 Feb 2008 12:43:04 - 1.8
+++ linux-libertine-fonts.spec 3 Sep 2008 21:23:24 - 1.9
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Name: linux-libertine-fonts
Version: 2.7.9
-Release: 1%{?dist}
+Release: 2%{?dist}
Summary: Linux Libertine Open Fonts
Group: User Interface/X
License: GPLv2+ with exceptions or OFL
@@ -69,6 +69,10 @@
%changelog
+* Wed Sep 3 2008 Nicolas Mailhot
+- 2.7.9-2
+â Rebuild with pre-F10-freeze fontforge
+
* Sun Feb 03 2008 Frank Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2.7.9-1
- Updated to 2.7.9
- Drop generated PDF files to save space
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 79878] OO.o can not select modern font faces conveniently
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878 User masayan changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'belegdol,beppec56,cmc,dta|'belegdol,beppec56,cmc,dta |rdon,fedorafonts,hdu,khira|rdon,fedorafonts,hdu,khira |no,mba,meywer,norbusan,ral|no,masayan,mba,meywer,norb |phie,rene,thb,tora' |usan,ralphie,rene,thb,tora | |' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 16792] [GTK] Fails to render Japanese/Chinese text with simple path
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16792 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #23155||review? Flag|| --- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-03 19:53 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=23155) --> (https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=23155&action=view) Font selection and rendering fixes GTK+ font fixes and enhancements. Implement font fallback for the simple FontConfig-based text path and improve the Pango-based complex text path to make use of requested font properties and available font selection. Add text shadow support to the complex path. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 16792] [GTK] Fails to render Japanese/Chinese text with simple path
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16792 --- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-03 20:01 PDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Created an attachment (id=23155) --> (https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=23155&action=view) [edit] > Font selection and rendering fixes > > GTK+ font fixes and enhancements. > > Implement font fallback for the simple FontConfig-based text path and > improve the Pango-based complex text path to make use of requested > font properties and available font selection. > > Add text shadow support to the complex path. > Some notes on this patch: 1) These changes push Pango's high level (layout) API as far as it can go. If we want to go further we'll probably want to use the low-level Pango API directly as Mozilla does, but at least the complex path is now feature-complete. 2) FontPlatformDataGtk's comparison operator and copy constructor need to be fixed some time to avoid leaking FontPlatformDatas. The leaks are pretty minor (per-font) and the fix was too involved to be ready for this patch. 3) Our FontConfig-based fallback font selection doesn't always match what Pango would select since we don't have that kind of advanced coverage analysis, but with these changes the simple path does successfully select fonts with the necessary glyphs available for the first time. I hope this improves the experience for users of non-Latin scripts and would be interested to get some feedback. You need to build with the "freetype" backend to see most of the improvements since they haven't been implemented in the "pango" backend yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
