[Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #16 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-30 02:55:01 EDT --- Thanks fixes the Japanese desktop problem for me. :) I still don't understand the discrepancy between monospace and sans... Behdad, any idea? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-30 01:45:54 EDT --- 1. if you have different font families, surely they declare different family names (or apps would not be able to select one instead of the other) ? 2. if they declare different family names, just use those names in the package naming 3. no proportional-gothic is not too long -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 482993] Renaming review: doulos-fonts to sil-doulos-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482993 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-30 01:43:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 482985] Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-30 01:42:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #22 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-30 01:39:48 EDT --- If you look at rawhide you'll see it's perfectly possible to have one of the font subpackages named like the srpm (and in fact this is what the main gentium package is going to do) srpm: sil-gentium-basic-fonts rpm: sil-gentium-basic-fonts sil-gentium-basic-fonts-common sil-gentium-basic-book-fonts (or sil-gentium-book-basic-fonts if you insist, would make it harder for reporters to find the right bugzilla component associated to the package)) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477397] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477397 --- Comment #19 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-30 01:40:33 EDT --- looks crazy to me but you can try, it's your package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477397] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477397 --- Comment #18 from Adam Goode 2009-01-30 00:45:52 EDT --- Would it be crazy to use FontForge at runtime to convert the TTF fonts into PFA fonts for each session? FontForge seems to be very fast at this. That way, we wouldn't need to ship any duplicate fonts at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|peter...@redhat.com |nicolas.mail...@laposte.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #21 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-01-29 23:59:33 EDT --- I used the general name because there are families named 'basic' and 'book-basic' within this package. So changing the name in the suggested way would make the subpackages' name 'sil-gentium-basic-basic-fonts' and 'sil-gentium-basic-book-basic-fonts'. If that is fine, I would change the name as per the suggestion in Comment 19 and 20. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #15 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-29 22:42:21 EDT --- Sample patch. Will modify sans and monospace if needed: http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/packages/cjkuni-fonts/cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-18.fc11.noarch.rpm http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/packages/cjkuni-fonts/cjkuni-fonts-common-0.2.20080216.1-18.fc11.noarch.rpm http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/packages/cjkuni-fonts/cjkuni-fonts-compat-0.2.20080216.1-18.fc11.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(mtas...@ioa.s.u-t ||okyo.ac.jp) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477465] [thaifonts-scalable] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477465 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Please convert |[thaifonts-scalable] Please |thaifonts-scalable to new |convert to new font |font packaging guidelines |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||476774 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Regression --- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-29 21:37:50 EDT --- Reverting to fontconfig-2.6.0-3.fc10 also fixes the problem, so this really does look like a fontconfig regression or change of behaviour. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Many chinese glyphs on |Japanese desktop defaulting |Japanese environment|to Chinese fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 482993] Renaming review: doulos-fonts to sil-doulos-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482993 Roozbeh Pournader changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Roozbeh Pournader 2009-01-29 21:16:45 EDT --- Thanks a lot Nicolas. OK, I hope I am doing this all right: * I removed the Provides and cleaned up the %setup -c. I will import the updated version into CVS. * fontconfig settings need to wait a bit, so I can make sure I learn the syntax properly. Next week, I hope. * Blocking request is here: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1263 New Package CVS Request === Package Name: sil-doulos-fonts Short Description: Doulos SIL fonts Owners: roozbeh Branches: InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 --- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH 2009-01-29 21:20:25 EDT --- I'm still trying to have a better name for subpackage. I'm quite not sure if we should treat a proportional designed gothic typeface as different font family name to gothic typeface. if we do, which name could we recognize as a family name? is "pgothic" a common sense for that as it's named? or should we have "proportional-gothic" as a family name? I impressed "proportional-gothic" is too long. if you have any suggestion, it would be appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/doulos-fonts/devel dead.package, 1.2, 1.3 .cvsignore, 1.7, NONE Makefile, 1.3, NONE doulos-fonts.spec, 1.7, NONE sources, 1.7, NONE
Author: roozbeh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/doulos-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28865 Added Files: dead.package Removed Files: .cvsignore Makefile doulos-fonts.spec sources Log Message: doulos-fonts is getting renamed to sil-doulos-fonts Index: dead.package === RCS file: dead.package diff -N dead.package --- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 - +++ dead.package30 Jan 2009 02:10:50 - 1.3 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +Renamed to sil-doulos-fonts --- .cvsignore DELETED --- --- Makefile DELETED --- --- doulos-fonts.spec DELETED --- --- sources DELETED --- ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 482985] Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985 Roozbeh Pournader changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Roozbeh Pournader 2009-01-29 20:59:58 EDT --- Thanks a lot Nicolas. OK, I hope I am doing this all right: * I removed the Provides and added more description for GentiumAlt. I will import the updated version into CVS. * fontconfig settings need to wait a bit, so I can make sure I learn the syntax properly. Next week, I hope. * Blocking request is here: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1262 New Package CVS Request === Package Name: sil-gentium-fonts Short Description: SIL Gentium fonts Owners: roozbeh Branches: InitialCC: fonts-sig kevin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Roozbeh Pournader changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |sil-gentium-fonts - |sil-gentium-basic-fonts - |Gentium Basic Font Family |Gentium Basic Font Family -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/gentium-fonts/devel .cvsignore,1.2,NONE
Author: roozbeh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gentium-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22634 Removed Files: .cvsignore Log Message: Package being renamed to sil-gentium-fonts. --- .cvsignore DELETED --- ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/gentium-fonts/devel dead.package, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, 1.1, NONE gentium-fonts.spec, 1.5, NONE sources, 1.2, NONE
Author: roozbeh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gentium-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22232 Added Files: dead.package Removed Files: Makefile gentium-fonts.spec sources Log Message: Package being renamed to sil-gentium-fonts. --- NEW FILE dead.package --- Renamed to sil-gentium-fonts --- Makefile DELETED --- --- gentium-fonts.spec DELETED --- --- sources DELETED --- ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 475743] Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-29 20:32:39 EDT --- The Japanese problem seems to be with Sans: eg if one switches the desktop application font to Monospace then VLGothic is used correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 475743] Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 475743] Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ccha...@redhat.com --- Comment #12 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-29 19:30:38 EDT --- I could lower the ranking of uming (Chinese fonts) by increasing the number of the .conf file. Which side would you prefer to make the changes? VL Gothic, Uming, or fontconfig? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477465] Please convert thaifonts-scalable to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477465 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Please convert to new font |Please convert |packaging guidelines|thaifonts-scalable to new ||font packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 3512] Implement font-stretch property
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512 --- Comment #60 from David Baron [:dbaron] 2009-01-29 15:46:23 PST --- OK, I landed those pieces: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/cbcf14ce64cc http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/e2182ed1e129 so I think what's left here should be the platform-specific parts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:07:37 EDT --- sj-fonts-2.0.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update sj-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1150 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:10:53 EDT --- sj-fonts-2.0.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sj-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1177 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481409] Review Request: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts - A stylized font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:07:28 EDT --- chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481409] Review Request: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts - A stylized font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:02:49 EDT --- dustin-domestic-manners-fonts-20030527-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update dustin-domestic-manners-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1093 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481409] Review Request: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts - A stylized font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:03:55 EDT --- chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:01:15 EDT --- dustin-domestic-manners-fonts-20030527-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dustin-domestic-manners-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1080 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477383] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477383 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-29 17:40:10 EDT --- (17:03:02) nphilipp: I'm struggling with making the extremetuxracer Fedora package compliant with the new font packaging guidelines... (17:03:48) nphilipp: The package contains two font files, PaperCuts20.ttf and PaperCuts_outline.ttf 17:05 (17:05:01) nphilipp: I've read through the relevant guidelines in the Wiki, but they seem to center around pure font packages... (17:05:43) nphilipp: Would it be correct to make a noarch subpackage "extremetuxracer-fonts" and leave the files in the same place? (17:07:38) nphilipp: or would it have to be a "extremetuxracer-papercuts-fonts" package with files beneath /usr/share/fonts and symlinks in the mainpackage? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Can_I_just_put_all_my_fonts_in_a_-fonts_subpackage.3F http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_is_a_compliant_font_.28sub.29package.3F http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#If_I_make_my_font_subpackage_noarch_koji_crashes.21 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#But_my_application_crashes_if_I_remove_the_font_file.28s.29.21 Basically our packaging guidelines really want you to locate fonts original upstreams and package them in separate packages, but if you insist on subpackaging your subpackages must conform to guidelines (and there are no templates in that case because there is too much variability) Also, you should put each separate font family in a separate (sub)package that can be installed without dragging in another font package or your app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 482993] Renaming review: doulos-fonts to sil-doulos-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482993 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rooz...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-29 17:07:11 EDT --- 1. probably better to use -n with %setup instead of using -c and playing mv games 2. Please consider http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Do_I_need_to_Provide_my_old_package_names.3F http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_if_the_new_naming_guidelines_require_me_to_rename_my_source_package.3F http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Am_I_done_after_creating_a_new_fonts_.28sub.29package_or_renaming_an_existing_one.3F http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#The_fontconfig_stuff_the_font_guidelines_suggest_seems_complex._Can_I_skip_it.3F However, despite the uglyness associated to 1., the package and upgrade path works. ⬕⬕⬕ APPROVED ⬕⬕⬕ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480878] fc-cache says that it writes to /var/tmp/${localstatedir}/cache/${PACKAGE} and it does - literally
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480878 Michal Jaegermann changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 482985] Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Clone Of|481476 | AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rooz...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-29 16:37:48 EDT --- Packaging is sane and upgrade path works ⬔⬔⬔ APPROVED ⬔⬔⬔ However: — Please consider adding some explanation in the alt subpackage description on the difference between alt and normal (it's in the package FAQ) — Please consider adding fontconfig rules that make each font family substiture for the other and for the gentium basic variants -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 482985] Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-29 16:39:42 EDT --- Also the following entries in the FAQ should apply: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Do_I_need_to_Provide_my_old_package_names.3F http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_if_the_new_naming_guidelines_require_me_to_rename_my_source_package.3F -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 483115] Review Request: allgeyer-fonts - Musical Notation True Type Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483115 Jochen Schmitt changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-01-29 15:20:36 EDT --- O, thank you for your hint. But I have to disagree with you, that ttf files are editable sources. But because upstream doesn't provides sources I think this is not a blocker for this review, So I can APPROVEd your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 483115] Review Request: allgeyer-fonts - Musical Notation True Type Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483115 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-fonts-bugs-l...@redh ||at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480464] [neverball] Adapt to font package renamings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480464 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-29 14:11:49 EDT --- /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Bold.ttf in dejavu-sans-fonts It's just replacing the "Sans Bold" in Vera by the "Sans Bold" in dejavu which is a derivative of the original Vera file. There's no magic arcane mapping involved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480464] [neverball] Adapt to font package renamings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480464 --- Comment #5 from Wart 2009-01-29 13:33:08 EDT --- If you can give me the dejavu font file name I should use instead of "/usr/share/fonts/bitstream-vera/VeraBd.ttf", then I can make the change. Otherwise I'd just be blindly replacing one font with another. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480464] [neverball] Adapt to font package renamings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480464 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-29 13:18:22 EDT --- It would be better to replace Vera with DejaVu, but I'll fight this battle another day http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477432, which changed state. Bug 477432 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477432 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477432] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477432 Wart changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Wart 2009-01-29 11:37:47 EDT --- This appears to have been fixed by another packager. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480464] [neverball] Adapt to font package renamings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480464 Wart changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #3 from Wart 2009-01-29 11:36:33 EDT --- As far as I can tell, this package already requires the correct font package name "bitstream-vera-sans-fonts". Please reopen this bug and offer an alternate font name if you believe this is incorrect. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480464, which changed state. Bug 480464 Summary: [neverball] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480464 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480479, which changed state. Bug 480479 Summary: [wormux] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480479 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480479] [wormux] Adapt to font package renamings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480479 Wart changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Wart 2009-01-29 11:19:22 EDT --- Rebuilt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 98139] Interaction of font-fallback and font-replacement table
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98139 User pl changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED --- Additional comments from p...@openoffice.org Thu Jan 29 11:05:33 + 2009 --- fine by me - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 98139] Interaction of font-fallback and font-replacement table
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98139 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'fedorafonts' |'fedorafonts,hdu' Assigned to|hdu |pl --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Thu Jan 29 10:25:08 + 2009 --- @pl,@cmc: please verify in CWS vcl99. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477448, which changed state. Bug 477448 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477448 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477448] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477448 Hedayat Vatankhah changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #12 from Hedayat Vatankhah 2009-01-29 03:52:29 EDT --- :) Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 482993] New: Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482993 Summary: Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rooz...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com Depends on: 181994 Blocks: 477335 Classification: Fedora Renaming of doulos-fonts to sil-doulos-fonts to comply with http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming New package: http://roozbeh.fedorapeople.org/sil-doulos-fonts.spec http://roozbeh.fedorapeople.org/sil-doulos-fonts-4.104-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477335] doulos-fonts: convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477335 Roozbeh Pournader changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||482993 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 482993] Renaming review: doulos-fonts to sil-doulos-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482993 Roozbeh Pournader changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Renaming review:|Renaming review: |gentium-fonts to|doulos-fonts to |sil-gentium-fonts |sil-doulos-fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
