[Bug 489928] FreeType 2.3.8 is not binary compatible to version 2.3.7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489928 Alexei Podtelezhnikov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||apodt...@ucsd.edu --- Comment #10 from Alexei Podtelezhnikov 2009-03-14 05:25:10 EDT --- This problem is greatly exaggerated!!! I was actually running F10 over freetype 2.3.8 since it was released. So I guess none of that long list of packages ever called `FT_Get_PS_Font_Info'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 489928] FreeType 2.3.8 is not binary compatible to version 2.3.7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489928 --- Comment #11 from Alexei Podtelezhnikov 2009-03-14 05:53:19 EDT --- I just realized this. Rawhide was massively rebuild against freetype 2.3.8. So, according to this bug report, rawhide is not compatible with new 2.3.9 right now and we should see the hell on earth. Luckily these long lists of packages have nothing to do with freetype directly. The announcement recommends to "search for the substrings `PS_FontInfo' and PS_Font_Info' in your source code". I kinda feel that would be pango, fontconfig, and just a handful of others. Or just do another mass-rebuild. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 487912] Unable to upgrade apanov-edrip-fonts, due to i18n provide issue
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #20 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-14 09:18:09 EDT --- It works on my rawhide system with rpm-4.7.0-0.beta1.4.fc11.x86_64 yum-3.2.21-15.fc11.noarch Thank you for fixing this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 347237] Making Pango use a given cairo_font_face_t
If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=347237 pango | general | Ver: unspecified Scott Percival changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pleaseba...@gmail.com -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=347237. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 490281] Bold font too bold
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490281 --- Comment #1 from Sachin Garg 2009-03-14 14:49:20 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=335221) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=335221) screenshot from ubuntu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 490281] New: Bold font too bold
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Bold font too bold https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490281 Summary: Bold font too bold Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: freetype AssignedTo: besfa...@redhat.com ReportedBy: asci...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: besfa...@redhat.com, ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org, fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=335220) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=335220) screenshot from fedora Description of problem: In fedora the bold fonts are too bold compared to the same font in ubuntu. This makes bold letter sightly unreadable. I have attached two screenshot one from ubuntu and other from fedora. You can see the difference Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977
Nicolas Mailhot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||needinfo?(l...@jcomserv.net
||)
--- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-14
14:52:33 EDT ---
Another pass:
1. you're not defining fontname as intended by the template and as a result you
have weird package names such as gnu-free-fonts-mono-fonts instead of a nice
gnu-free-mono-fonts
fontname shoud not have the same value as name or we would not bother with it
2. your fontconfig symlinks are broken
lrw-r--r--1 rootroot 52 mars 14 19:35
/etc/fonts/conf.d/60-gnu-free-fonts-mono.conf ->
/usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/gnu-free-fonts-m
ono
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 334 mars 5 21:46
/usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-gnu-free-fonts-mono.conf
It would probably simpler if you just used the symlinking logic proposed by the
template
3. Your compat package
Requires: gnu-free-fonts-freemono-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
Requires: gnu-free-fonts-freesans-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
Requires: gnu-free-fonts-freeserif-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
But your srpm generates subpackages named differently, so it won't work
4. rpmlint points some minor problems
W: spelling-error-in-description compatability compatibility
E: description-line-too-long This package only exists to help transition pre
20090104-4 freefotn users to the new\
W: summary-not-capitalized freefont compatibility package
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.52, 1.53 dejavu-fonts.spec, 1.98, 1.99 import.log, 1.13, 1.14 sources, 1.52, 1.53
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30004/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore dejavu-fonts.spec import.log sources
Log Message:
2.29
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.52
retrieving revision 1.53
diff -u -r1.52 -r1.53
--- .cvsignore 21 Dec 2008 17:18:47 - 1.52
+++ .cvsignore 14 Mar 2009 19:05:29 - 1.53
@@ -1 +1 @@
-dejavu-fonts-2.28.tar.bz2
+dejavu-fonts-2.29.tar.bz2
Index: dejavu-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/dejavu-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.98
retrieving revision 1.99
diff -u -r1.98 -r1.99
--- dejavu-fonts.spec 24 Feb 2009 11:21:21 - 1.98
+++ dejavu-fonts.spec 14 Mar 2009 19:05:29 - 1.99
@@ -27,8 +27,8 @@
Name:%{fontname}-fonts
-Version: 2.28
-Release: 6%{?alphatag}%{?dist}
+Version: 2.29
+Release: 1%{?alphatag}%{?dist}
Summary: DejaVu fonts
Group: User Interface/X
@@ -242,8 +242,12 @@
%changelog
-* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering
- 2.28-6
-- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+* Sat Mar 14 2009 Nicolas Mailhot
+- 2.29-1
+
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering
+- 2.28-6
+â Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot
- 2.28-5
Index: import.log
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.13
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -r1.13 -r1.14
--- import.log 23 Feb 2009 08:29:58 - 1.13
+++ import.log 14 Mar 2009 19:05:29 - 1.14
@@ -11,3 +11,4 @@
dejavu-fonts-2_28-3_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.28-3.fc11.src.rpm:1232147011
dejavu-fonts-2_28-4_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.28-4.fc11.src.rpm:1234084218
dejavu-fonts-2_28-5_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.28-5.fc11.src.rpm:123533
+dejavu-fonts-2_29-1_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.29-1.fc11.src.rpm:1237057458
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.52
retrieving revision 1.53
diff -u -r1.52 -r1.53
--- sources 21 Dec 2008 17:18:48 - 1.52
+++ sources 14 Mar 2009 19:05:29 - 1.53
@@ -1 +1 @@
-fff585e19115dbe76746f6df66ab0dc6 dejavu-fonts-2.28.tar.bz2
+4728d26da8daa5b4ebe87c428d745b06 dejavu-fonts-2.29.tar.bz2
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 489928] FreeType 2.3.8 is not binary compatible to version 2.3.7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489928 --- Comment #12 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-14 16:52:24 EDT --- Alexei, the scope and implications of this bug are very well understood. Please don't add comments that do not add any information. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 489928] FreeType 2.3.8 is not binary compatible to version 2.3.7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489928 --- Comment #13 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-14 17:05:42 EDT --- After inspecting the ABI-breaking change in 2.3.8, I'm fairly confident that we don't need to recompile any of the packages. 2.3.7->2.3.8 could cause memory corruption, but 2.3.8->2.3.9 is fairly safe. I'll ask 2.3.9 to be tagged in F11 and close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/fontconfig/devel fontconfig.spec, 1.127, 1.128 sources, 1.42, 1.43
Author: behdad
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5398
Modified Files:
fontconfig.spec sources
Log Message:
* Tue Mar 14 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.99.behdad-3
- New tarball with version fixed in the header
Index: fontconfig.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.127
retrieving revision 1.128
diff -u -r1.127 -r1.128
--- fontconfig.spec 13 Mar 2009 23:11:08 - 1.127
+++ fontconfig.spec 14 Mar 2009 22:59:59 - 1.128
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Summary: Font configuration and customization library
Name: fontconfig
Version: 2.6.99.behdad
-Release: 2%{?dist}
+Release: 3%{?dist}
License: MIT
Group: System Environment/Libraries
Source: http://fontconfig.org/release/fontconfig-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -131,6 +131,9 @@
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Tue Mar 14 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.99.behdad-3
+- New tarball with version fixed in the header
+
* Tue Mar 13 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.99.behdad-2
- Previous tarball was broken. Rebuild with respinned ball.
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.42
retrieving revision 1.43
diff -u -r1.42 -r1.43
--- sources 13 Mar 2009 23:11:08 - 1.42
+++ sources 14 Mar 2009 23:00:00 - 1.43
@@ -1 +1 @@
-1e713a359867608d7733ebec47b9daaf fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.tar.gz
+eec83c56829148d5511d5b896339bb25 fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.tar.gz
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 487912] Unable to upgrade apanov-edrip-fonts, due to i18n provide issue
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 --- Comment #21 from Herbert Carl Meyer 2009-03-14 20:08:41 EDT --- also fixed by yum -15. Thank you for a very interesting discussion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 70132] Support @font-face
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #184 from David Baron [:dbaron] 2009-03-14 19:14:02 PDT --- I filed the checksum issue as bug 483459. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 490281] Bold font too bold
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490281 sangu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sangu.fed...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from sangu 2009-03-14 23:12:56 EDT --- Duplicated bug 485685 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
