[Bug 488675] accelerator keys is ignored
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488675 Akira TAGOH changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 488675] accelerator keys is ignored
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488675 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-17 02:55:26 EDT --- imsettings-0.105.1-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/imsettings-0.105.1-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #36 from Jens Petersen 2009-03-17 01:51:55 EDT --- Peter: I think we are waiting for the submission to be updated to the new Fonts Packaging Guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 490583] New: Package includes the wrong fonts, so rendering of most Myanmar words is wrong
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package includes the wrong fonts, so rendering of most Myanmar words is wrong https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490583 Summary: Package includes the wrong fonts, so rendering of most Myanmar words is wrong Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: low Component: padauk-fonts AssignedTo: mvali...@redhat.com ReportedBy: de...@thanlwinsoft.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: mvali...@redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The package is packaging fonts from the font-source directory which have no Graphite or OpenType font tables. This means that most Myanmar words render completely wrongly. Please use Padauk.ttf and Padauk-Bold.ttf NOT padauk-src.ttf and padaukbold-src.ttf. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.4-2 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.type a Myanmar word in gedit e.g. မြန်မာ Actual results: The wrap U+103C is rendered around the second consonant, which is wrong. Expected results: The wrap U+103C should be around the first consonant Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 478570] Review Request: oflb-riordonfancy-fonts - A stylized font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478570 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |RiordonFancy-fonts - A |oflb-riordonfancy-fonts - A |stylized font |stylized font Flag|needinfo?(ivazquez...@gmail | |.com) | --- Comment #2 from Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams 2009-03-16 23:21:41 EDT --- Updated. http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/oflb-riordonfancy-fonts/oflb-riordonfancy-fonts.spec http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/oflb-riordonfancy-fonts/oflb-riordonfancy-fonts-4-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 490418] gdm language list choice dialog does not appear
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490418 --- Comment #2 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-16 19:33:49 EDT --- Built 1.24.0 and filed a ticket for it to be tagged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/pango/devel .cvsignore, 1.84, 1.85 pango.spec, 1.156, 1.157 sources, 1.85, 1.86 pango-1.23.0-g5317893.patch, 1.2, NONE
Author: behdad
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20844
Modified Files:
.cvsignore pango.spec sources
Removed Files:
pango-1.23.0-g5317893.patch
Log Message:
* Mon Mar 16 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 1.24.0-1
- Update to 1.24.0
- Package pango-view.1.gz
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.84
retrieving revision 1.85
diff -u -r1.84 -r1.85
--- .cvsignore 3 Feb 2009 16:12:07 - 1.84
+++ .cvsignore 16 Mar 2009 23:17:14 - 1.85
@@ -1 +1 @@
-pango-1.23.0.tar.bz2
+pango-1.24.0.tar.bz2
Index: pango.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/pango.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.156
retrieving revision 1.157
diff -u -r1.156 -r1.157
--- pango.spec 11 Mar 2009 17:32:32 - 1.156
+++ pango.spec 16 Mar 2009 23:17:14 - 1.157
@@ -8,11 +8,11 @@
Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text
Name: pango
-Version: 1.23.0
-Release: 4.g5317893%{?dist}
+Version: 1.24.0
+Release: 1%{?dist}
License: LGPLv2+
Group: System Environment/Libraries
-Source: http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.23/pango-%{version}.tar.bz2
+Source: http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.24/pango-%{version}.tar.bz2
URL: http://www.pango.org
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
@@ -39,8 +39,6 @@
# Look for pango.modules in an arch-specific directory
Patch0: pango-1.21.4-lib64.patch
-Patch1: pango-1.23.0-g5317893.patch
-
%description
Pango is a library for laying out and rendering of text, with an emphasis
on internationalization. Pango can be used anywhere that text layout is needed,
@@ -77,8 +75,6 @@
%patch0 -p1 -b .lib64
-%patch1 -p1 -b .git
-
%build
%configure --enable-gtk-doc --enable-doc-cross-references
--with-included-modules=basic-fc
@@ -212,6 +208,7 @@
%{_libdir}/libpango*-*.so.*
%{_bindir}/pango-querymodules*
%{_bindir}/pango-view
+%{_datadir}/man/man1/pango-view.1.gz
%{_libdir}/pango
%doc %{_mandir}/man1/*
@@ -228,6 +225,10 @@
%changelog
+* Mon Mar 16 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 1.24.0-1
+- Update to 1.24.0
+- Package pango-view.1.gz
+
* Wed Mar 11 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 1.23.0-4.g5317893
- Push changes from git
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.85
retrieving revision 1.86
diff -u -r1.85 -r1.86
--- sources 3 Feb 2009 16:12:07 - 1.85
+++ sources 16 Mar 2009 23:17:14 - 1.86
@@ -1 +1 @@
-358a87607c0a5b4889bab52b1cf5e921 pango-1.23.0.tar.bz2
+d209f41079833cd2ef2c5e580ab9c5ee pango-1.24.0.tar.bz2
--- pango-1.23.0-g5317893.patch DELETED ---
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 489928] FreeType 2.3.8 is not binary compatible to version 2.3.7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489928 Behdad Esfahbod changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #14 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-16 18:19:35 EDT --- Tagged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Jesse Keating changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #47 from Jesse Keating 2009-03-16 18:09:20 EDT --- We just tagged so I'll close this rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 489117] Review Request: tulrich-tuffy-fonts - Generic sans font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489117 Felix Schwarz changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(felix.schw...@oss | |.schwarz.eu)| --- Comment #2 from Felix Schwarz 2009-03-16 17:48:48 EDT --- I updated the existing wiki page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Tuffy_fonts (is this level of detail ok with you? - I am still new to font packaging) I can update the package in a few days (currently I'm swamped). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Felix Schwarz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||felix.schw...@oss.schwarz.e ||u --- Comment #28 from Felix Schwarz 2009-03-16 17:46:34 EDT --- Probably you should also update the wiki page as this font has at least a pkgdb page now: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIL_Gentium_Basic_fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720
Nicolas Mailhot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Flag|needinfo?(sanjay_an...@yaho |
|o.co.in)|
--- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-16
16:11:17 EDT ---
I seem to have missed this update, sorry, should have looked at it way before.
This package looks a lot more sane, but it still has the following mistakes
1. you're not buildrequiring fontforge, so it won't build. Please check your
packages in mock or a koji scratch build before submitting
2. will probably need the same change as other packages to build on rawhide
fontforge
3. I don't think you need to put sfd everywhere, unless the author requested it
like for old standard
4. no idea if using %{common_desc} instead of %common_desc will have bad
side-effects or not
5. you're not using the suggested fontconf form, it needs to be something like
number-%{fontname} to work. To choose the right number see
/usr/share/fontconfig/templates/fontconfig-priorities.txt
6. It's considered bad form to mix $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} in a single
template
7. be careful to put your doc in the common subpackage, not the main package
8. you can put the "beteckna" font in the main package as it's named "beteckna"
not "beteckna general". Look how the "gentium basic" package does it. The
fontconfig file probably needs to be adapted
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(sanjay_an...@yaho ||o.co.in) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #46 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-03-16 14:14:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #45) > Rawhide should be installable, what I need is a clear idea if this is really a > beta blocker issue or not. Well, I tried the current fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad-3.fc11 and it seems be working for me. So tagging this fontconfig as f11-beta may be a good idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Jesse Keating changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jkeat...@redhat.com Flag||needinfo? --- Comment #45 from Jesse Keating 2009-03-16 14:02:59 EDT --- Rawhide should be installable, what I need is a clear idea if this is really a beta blocker issue or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477389] [ghostscript-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477389 Tim Waugh changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 490418] gdm language list choice dialog does not appear
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490418 Matthias Clasen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||besfa...@redhat.com, ||fedora-fonts-bugs-l...@redh ||at.com, mcla...@redhat.com Component|gdm |pango AssignedTo|jmcc...@redhat.com |besfa...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Matthias Clasen 2009-03-16 11:32:27 EDT --- Which pango do you have ? This is supposedly fixed with the latest pango in rawhide. I thought I asked Behdad to file a ticket to get it tagged, but maybe not... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 490369] Package does not build in rawhide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490369 Ankur Sinha changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 490371] Package does not build in rawhide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490371 Ankur Sinha changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
