[Bug 490610] New: [mr_IN][hi_IN] Anchoring in combinat ion द + ़ looks need update
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [mr_IN][hi_IN] Anchoring in combination द + ़ looks need update https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490610 Summary: [mr_IN][hi_IN] Anchoring in combination द + ़ looks need update Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: low Priority: low Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: rbhal...@redhat.com ReportedBy: psatp...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: peter...@redhat.com, rbhal...@redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com, fedora-i18n-b...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: in combination तद़, द with ़ looks not proper Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): lohit-fonts-2.3.8-1 How reproducible: everytime Steps to Reproduce: 1.type above combination [U+0924, U+0926, U+093C] 2. 3. Actual results: nukta looks more nearer to त Expected results: its should be nearer or at the bottom of द Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 489919] Unable to view any PS/EPS files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489919 Ngo Than changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #3 from Ngo Than 2009-03-17 07:33:10 EDT --- evince should show the warnnings if the fonts are missing. Perhaps the warnings were saved in the log files in your case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 490331] Crash of galeon in libpango
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490331 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||pango-1.24.0-1.fc11.x86_64 Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Jan Kratochvil 2009-03-17 08:07:06 EDT --- Verified as no longer crashing. It just now prints: (galeon:10431): Pango-WARNING **: failed to choose a font, expect ugly output. engine-type='PangoRenderFc', script='common' (galeon:10431): Pango-WARNING **: failed to choose a font, expect ugly output. engine-type='PangoRenderFc', script='latin' and a lot of: (galeon:10431): Pango-CRITICAL **: _pango_engine_shape_covers: assertion `PANGO_IS_FONT (font)' failed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 485685] Embolden Font with embeddedbitmap is ugly in firefox.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485685 --- Comment #3 from sangu 2009-03-17 08:24:36 EDT --- This issue happens by this patch http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~behdad/fontconfig/commit/?id=10609af4aa4030a15c19573198462fa002d2ef13 < https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19904 > After removing the patch in /etc/fonts/conf.d/90-synthetic.conf, embolden rendering of embeddedbitmap font becomes good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480468] [php-ZendFramework] Adapt to font package renamings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480468 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-17 11:36:21 EDT --- php-ZendFramework-1.7.7-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ZendFramework-1.7.7-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 490331] Crash of galeon in libpango
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490331 --- Comment #4 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-17 12:21:12 EDT --- Thanks, fixed the assertion upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 485685] Embolden Font with embeddedbitmap is ugly in firefox.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485685 Behdad Esfahbod changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asci...@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-17 12:25:57 EDT --- *** Bug 490281 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 490281] Bold font too bold
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490281 Behdad Esfahbod changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-17 12:25:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Duplicated bug 485685 ? Quite possibly. Lets dupe. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 485685 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/fontconfig/devel .cvsignore, 1.40, 1.41 fontconfig.spec, 1.128, 1.129 sources, 1.43, 1.44
Author: behdad
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20694
Modified Files:
.cvsignore fontconfig.spec sources
Log Message:
* Tue Mar 13 2009 Behdad Esfahbod -
* 2.6.99.behdad.20090317-1
- Update to 2.6.99.behdad.20090317
- Resolves #485685
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.40
retrieving revision 1.41
diff -u -r1.40 -r1.41
--- .cvsignore 13 Mar 2009 22:29:39 - 1.40
+++ .cvsignore 17 Mar 2009 17:00:38 - 1.41
@@ -1 +1 @@
-fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.tar.gz
+fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090317.tar.gz
Index: fontconfig.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.128
retrieving revision 1.129
diff -u -r1.128 -r1.129
--- fontconfig.spec 14 Mar 2009 22:59:59 - 1.128
+++ fontconfig.spec 17 Mar 2009 17:00:38 - 1.129
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
Summary: Font configuration and customization library
Name: fontconfig
-Version: 2.6.99.behdad
-Release: 3%{?dist}
+Version: 2.6.99.behdad.20090317
+Release: 1%{?dist}
License: MIT
Group: System Environment/Libraries
Source: http://fontconfig.org/release/fontconfig-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -131,6 +131,10 @@
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Tue Mar 13 2009 Behdad Esfahbod -
2.6.99.behdad.20090317-1
+- Update to 2.6.99.behdad.20090317
+- Resolves #485685
+
* Tue Mar 14 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.99.behdad-3
- New tarball with version fixed in the header
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.43
retrieving revision 1.44
diff -u -r1.43 -r1.44
--- sources 14 Mar 2009 23:00:00 - 1.43
+++ sources 17 Mar 2009 17:00:38 - 1.44
@@ -1 +1 @@
-eec83c56829148d5511d5b896339bb25 fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.tar.gz
+a5bdb5fa9bdfce0e06354f64307a23cc fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090317.tar.gz
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/fontconfig/devel fontconfig.spec,1.129,1.130
Author: behdad
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22020
Modified Files:
fontconfig.spec
Log Message:
Fix date
Index: fontconfig.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.129
retrieving revision 1.130
diff -u -r1.129 -r1.130
--- fontconfig.spec 17 Mar 2009 17:00:38 - 1.129
+++ fontconfig.spec 17 Mar 2009 17:04:17 - 1.130
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
-* Tue Mar 13 2009 Behdad Esfahbod -
2.6.99.behdad.20090317-1
+* Tue Mar 17 2009 Behdad Esfahbod -
2.6.99.behdad.20090317-1
- Update to 2.6.99.behdad.20090317
- Resolves #485685
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480468] [php-ZendFramework] Adapt to font package renamings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480468
Alexander Kahl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from Alexander Kahl 2009-03-17 13:03:41
EDT ---
Note regarding #4: 1.7.7-2 for both dist-10 and rawhide correctly
{Build,}Requires the corresponding font packages so the update has been marked
to fix this bug.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 --- Comment #14 from Ankur Sinha 2009-03-17 13:14:53 EDT --- hi, made the changes : http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/beteckna-0.3/beteckna-fonts.spec http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/beteckna-0.3/beteckna-fonts-0.3-4.fc10.src.rpm tested the srpm using mock.. all processes returned 0 so im assuming it was a successful build.. regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 485685] Embolden Font with embeddedbitmap is ugly in firefox.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485685 --- Comment #5 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-17 13:16:50 EDT --- Built fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090317-1.fc11 which removes that patch. Requested it to be tagged for f11 beta. https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1390 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 --- Comment #15 from Ankur Sinha 2009-03-17 13:28:39 EDT --- hi, i got these in the output though.. DEBUG: Bad sfd file. Glyph igrave has width 207 even though it should be DEBUG: bound to the width of dotlessi which is 186. DEBUG: Bad sfd file. Glyph iacute has width 207 even though it should be DEBUG: bound to the width of dotlessi which is 186. DEBUG: Bad sfd file. Glyph icircumflex has width 207 even though it should be DEBUG: bound to the width of dotlessi which is 186. DEBUG: Bad sfd file. Glyph idieresis has width 207 even though it should be DEBUG: bound to the width of dotlessi which is 186. DEBUG: Bad sfd file. Glyph Agrave has width 695 even though it should be DEBUG: bound to the width of A which is 674. DEBUG: Bad sfd file. Glyph Aring has width 695 even though it should be DEBUG: bound to the width of A which is 674. DEBUG: Bad sfd file. Glyph Egrave has width 518 even though it should be DEBUG: bound to the width of E which is 483. DEBUG: Bad sfd file. Glyph aring has width 476 even though it should be DEBUG: bound to the width of a which is 480. How do i handle these? Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 490418] gdm language list choice dialog does not appear
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490418 Matthias Clasen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Matthias Clasen 2009-03-17 21:46:15 EDT --- It has ben tagged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 490791] New: cjk texts are broken in flash object of webpage.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: cjk texts are broken in flash object of webpage. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490791 Summary: cjk texts are broken in flash object of webpage. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfa...@redhat.com ReportedBy: sangu.fed...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: besfa...@redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=335641) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=335641) boxs in yellow box Description of problem: cjk texts are broken in flash object of webpage. $cat ~/.xsession-errors [...] W[ 1237343148.899510]:Error while processing a value type NestedList: Error while processing a value type XFontSet: Unable to compose a value type XFontSet properly due to the size difference: expected size: 458, actual size: 460 W[ 1237343148.899859]:Error while processing a value type NestedList: Error while processing a value type XFontSet: Unable to compose a value type XFontSet properly due to the size difference: expected size: 458, actual size: 460 See http://www.mtvjapan.com/index.html. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.6.99.behdad-3.fc11, 2.6.99.behdad.20090317-1.fc11 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. visits cjk webpage with flash object ( http://www.mtvjapan.com/index.html ) 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: No problem in 2.6.95-1.git.66.gb162bfb.fc11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 485685] Embolden Font with embeddedbitmap is ugly in firefox.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485685 sangu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||2.6.99.behdad.20090317-1.fc ||11 Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from sangu 2009-03-17 23:40:09 EDT --- Fixed in fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090317-1.fc11 < http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=94516 > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 490418] gdm language list choice dialog does not appear
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490418 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-03-18 02:16:20 EDT --- Thanks seems to be working now in rawhide again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
