[Bug 490888] All fonts are monospace after upgrade to fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad-3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490888 --- Comment #8 from Deji Akingunola 2009-03-18 22:28:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > (In reply to comment #4) > > > Built fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090318-1.fc11 > > > > WORKSFORME (had similar issue reported with 2.6.99.behdad-3.fc11.x86_64). > > Cool. So you had broken fonts, updated, and they were not broken anymore? Something close to that. I have other fonts (not included in Fedora anymore) installed and my font preferences set in /etc/fonts/local.conf. But on update to fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad-3.fc11.x86_64, the custom settings doesn't have any effects, and my monospaced fonts revert to stock Fedora's. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 490888] All fonts are monospace after upgrade to fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad-3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490888 --- Comment #7 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-18 21:12:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Built fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090318-1.fc11 > > WORKSFORME (had similar issue reported with 2.6.99.behdad-3.fc11.x86_64). Cool. So you had broken fonts, updated, and they were not broken anymore? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 490888] All fonts are monospace after upgrade to fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad-3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490888 Deji Akingunola changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dakin...@gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Deji Akingunola 2009-03-18 20:27:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Built fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090318-1.fc11 WORKSFORME (had similar issue reported with 2.6.99.behdad-3.fc11.x86_64). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 490888] All fonts are monospace after upgrade to fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad-3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490888 --- Comment #5 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-18 20:01:46 EDT --- https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1401 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 490888] All fonts are monospace after upgrade to fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad-3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490888 --- Comment #4 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-18 19:54:58 EDT --- Built fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090318-1.fc11 Requesting tag now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/fontconfig/devel .cvsignore, 1.41, 1.42 fontconfig.spec, 1.130, 1.131 sources, 1.44, 1.45
Author: behdad
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32601
Modified Files:
.cvsignore fontconfig.spec sources
Log Message:
* Tue Mar 18 2009 Behdad Esfahbod -
2.6.99.behdad.20090318-1
- Update to 2.6.99.behdad.20090318
- Resolves #490888
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.41
retrieving revision 1.42
diff -u -r1.41 -r1.42
--- .cvsignore 17 Mar 2009 17:00:38 - 1.41
+++ .cvsignore 18 Mar 2009 23:43:18 - 1.42
@@ -1 +1 @@
-fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090317.tar.gz
+fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090318.tar.gz
Index: fontconfig.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.130
retrieving revision 1.131
diff -u -r1.130 -r1.131
--- fontconfig.spec 17 Mar 2009 17:04:17 - 1.130
+++ fontconfig.spec 18 Mar 2009 23:43:18 - 1.131
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Summary: Font configuration and customization library
Name: fontconfig
-Version: 2.6.99.behdad.20090317
+Version: 2.6.99.behdad.20090318
Release: 1%{?dist}
License: MIT
Group: System Environment/Libraries
@@ -131,6 +131,10 @@
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Tue Mar 18 2009 Behdad Esfahbod -
2.6.99.behdad.20090318-1
+- Update to 2.6.99.behdad.20090318
+- Resolves #490888
+
* Tue Mar 17 2009 Behdad Esfahbod -
2.6.99.behdad.20090317-1
- Update to 2.6.99.behdad.20090317
- Resolves #485685
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.44
retrieving revision 1.45
diff -u -r1.44 -r1.45
--- sources 17 Mar 2009 17:00:38 - 1.44
+++ sources 18 Mar 2009 23:43:18 - 1.45
@@ -1 +1 @@
-a5bdb5fa9bdfce0e06354f64307a23cc fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090317.tar.gz
+6f2ecfcd695f3f7ec32ae7bdfe438b33 fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090318.tar.gz
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 490888] All fonts are monospace after upgrade to fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad-3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490888 --- Comment #3 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-18 19:36:38 EDT --- commit a03e7b11fbe9a4710575f27e8701fcd7fa902844 Author: Behdad Esfahbod Date: Wed Mar 18 19:28:52 2009 -0400 [fc-lang] Make LangSet representation in the cache files stable Fontconfig assigns an index number to each language it knows about. The index is used to index a bit in FcLangSet language map. The bit map is stored in the cache. Previously fc-lang simply sorted the list of languages and assigned them an index starting from zero. Net effect is that whenever new orth files were added, all the FcLangSet info in the cache files would become invalid. This was causing weird bugs like this one: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490888 With this commit we fix the index assigned to each language. The index will be based on the order the orth files are passed to fc-lang. As a result all orth files are explicitly listed in Makefile.am now, and new additions should be made to the end of the list. The list is made to reflect the sorted list of orthographies from 2.6.0 released followed by new additions since. This fixes the stability problem. Needless to say, recreating caches is necessary before any new orthography is recognized in existing fonts, but at least the existing caches are still valid and don't cause bugs like the above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 488675] accelerator keys is ignored
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488675 --- Comment #15 from Michael 2009-03-18 17:16:20 EDT --- The update is unavailable yet: [r...@ex ~]# rpm -qa | grep imsettings imsettings-0.105.1-3.fc10.1.i386 imsettings-libs-0.105.1-3.fc10.1.i386 [r...@ex ~]# yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update imsettings Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit Setting up Update Process No Packages marked for Update [r...@ex ~]# -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 490888] All fonts are monospace after upgrade to fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad-3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490888 --- Comment #2 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-18 17:07:40 EDT --- Ok, I understand the bug now. Working on a fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 488675] accelerator keys is ignored
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488675 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-18 15:14:00 EDT --- imsettings-0.105.1-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update imsettings'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-2843 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480468] [php-ZendFramework] Adapt to font package renamings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480468 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-18 15:09:35 EDT --- php-ZendFramework-1.7.7-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-ZendFramework'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-2823 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 490888] All fonts are monospace after upgrade to fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad-3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490888 --- Comment #1 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-18 13:41:45 EDT --- The rm is there to cleanup earlier naming convention where there was no arch in the file name. So that's not the issue. Did the update also update any font packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 490941] New: fc-match "times roman" results in a Sans font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: fc-match "times roman" results in a Sans font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490941 Summary: fc-match "times roman" results in a Sans font Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: dejavu-fonts AssignedTo: nicolas.mail...@laposte.net ReportedBy: john.ell...@comcast.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nicolas.mail...@laposte.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: fc-match "times roman" results in a Sans font Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch fontconfig-2.6.0-3.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. fc-match "times roman" 2. 3. Actual results: DejaVuSans.ttf: "DejaVu Sans" "Book" Expected results: DejaVuSerif.ttf: "DejaVu Serif" "Book" Additional info: Perhaps this should be fixed in fontconfig as well? Clearly (to the user) any font name beginning with "times" should return a Serif font. eg: fc-match times fc-match "times roman" fc-match "times new roman" fc-match "times-roman" fc-match "times-new-roman" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-18 09:34:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Re the symlinks, why do we use absolute and not relative symlinks in font > pacakges? Because it's simpler and FPC already decided the rpmlint warning about absolute symlinks was trashable. But they're ok not requiring our rpmlint packager to remove it and having people waste their time in reviews over it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(l...@jcomserv.net | |) | --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla 2009-03-18 09:17:53 EDT --- Fixed 1, 2, 3, and 4. SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts-20090104-8.fc10.src.rpm Re the symlinks, why do we use absolute and not relative symlinks in font pacakges? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 490888] New: All fonts are monospace after upgrade to fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad-3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: All fonts are monospace after upgrade to fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad-3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490888 Summary: All fonts are monospace after upgrade to fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad-3 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfa...@redhat.com ReportedBy: mschm...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: besfa...@redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Today I did 'yum update' on my Rawhide KVM guest. About 20 packages were updated, among them was fontconfig. After reboot to get the new kernel, all fonts in GDM were monospaced and without antialiasing. After logging in into GNOME everything was monospaced and no AA too (menus, window titles, gnome-terminal, ...). I thought I had lost my Preferences -> Appearance -> Fonts settings, so I went there to check, but all fonts appeared the same. The problem was fixed it by running 'fc-cache -r' and logging out and back in. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): The upgrade was from: fontconfig-2.6.97-5.g945d6a4.fc11.x86_64 to: fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad-3.fc11.x86_64 How reproducible: Not sure. I haven't tried downgrading and repeating the upgrade yet. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Update fontconfig 2. Reboot (although relogin would probably be sufficient) Actual results: All fonts are monospace and without antialiasing. Expected results: Font should look as they did before the upgrade. Additional info: I suspect the bug is in fontconfig's postinstall script where it does: rm -f /var/cache/fontconfig/.cache-2 But at least on my system the number of question marks does not correspond to the actual filename lengths of the files in that directory. E.g. /var/cache/fontconfig/3830d5c3ddfd5cd38a049b759396e72e-x86-64.cache-2 (the "-x86-64" is not accounted for) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 490830] New: Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 Summary: Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: nafees-web-naskh-fonts AssignedTo: mathieu.bri...@gmail.com ReportedBy: pnem...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jo...@redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com, mathieu.bri...@gmail.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Nafees Web Naksha when installed shows only Nafees as font name in font selection box. When other Nafees fonts installed manually all will point to same name Nafees in font selection dialog box.This should not happen and should show all font names from Nafees font family Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): nafees-web-naskh-fonts-1.0-5.fc11.noarch How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. install this font 2. open this font in fontforge 3. check TTFNames in FontInfo(Ctrl+Shift+F) 4. Look for Preferred Family and Family fields. Actual results: currently it shows font name as Nafees Expected results: Should show font name as Nafees Web Naksha Additional info: Thanks to Muhammad Saad who reported this on fedora-i18n channel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
