[Bug 493814] New: spec file doesn't provide "provides" field
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: spec file doesn't provide "provides" field https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493814 Summary: spec file doesn't provide "provides" field Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: smc-fonts AssignedTo: psatp...@redhat.com ReportedBy: psatp...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com, psatp...@redhat.com, rajeeshknamb...@gmail.com, fedora-i18n-b...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: spec file doesn't provide "provides" field, other packages trying to installing with old name are failing due to this Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): smc-meera-fonts-04.1-5 How reproducible: every time Steps to Reproduce: 1.try installing smc-fonts-meera it will say package does not exist 2. 3. Actual results: it says Expected results: it should still install smc-meera-fonts package Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/smc-fonts/devel smc-fonts.spec,1.6,1.7
Author: pravins
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/smc-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18272
Modified Files:
smc-fonts.spec
Log Message:
* Fri Apr 03 2009 Pravin Satpute 04.1-6
- bugfix 493814
- added 'Provides' field for packages
Index: smc-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/smc-fonts/devel/smc-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- smc-fonts.spec 26 Feb 2009 01:41:38 - 1.6
+++ smc-fonts.spec 3 Apr 2009 09:27:32 - 1.7
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
Name: %{fontname}-fonts
Version: 04.1
-Release: 5%{?dist}
+Release: 6%{?dist}
Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script
Group: User Interface/X
License: GPLv3+ with exceptions and GPLv2+ with exceptions and GPLv2+
and GPLv2
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
Group: User Interface/X
Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
License: GPLv3+ with exceptions
+Provides: %{fontname}-fonts-dyuthi = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: %{name}-dyuthi < 04.1-4
%description -n %{fontname}-dyuthi-fonts
The Dyuthi font package contains fonts for the display of
@@ -46,6 +47,7 @@
Group: User Interface/X
Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
License: GPLv2+ with exceptions
+Provides: %{fontname}-fonts-meera = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: %{name}-meera < 04.1-4
%description -n %{fontname}-meera-fonts
The Meera font package contains fonts for the display of
@@ -59,6 +61,7 @@
Group: User Interface/X
Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
License: GPLv2+
+Provides: %{fontname}-fonts-rachana = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: %{name}-rachana < 04.1-4
%description -n %{fontname}-rachana-fonts
The Rachana font package contains fonts for the display of
@@ -72,6 +75,7 @@
Group: User Interface/X
Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
License: GPLv2
+Provides: %{fontname}-fonts-raghumalayalam = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: %{name}-raghumalayalam < 04.1-4
%description -n %{fontname}-raghumalayalam-fonts
The SMC Malayalam fonts package contains fonts for the display of
@@ -84,6 +88,7 @@
Group: User Interface/X
Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
License: GPLv3+ with exceptions
+Provides: %{fontname}-fonts-suruma = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: %{name}-suruma < 04.1-4
%description -n %{fontname}-suruma-fonts
The Suruma font package contains fonts for the display of
@@ -96,6 +101,7 @@
Group: User Interface/X
Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
License: GPLv3+ with exceptions
+Provides: %{fontname}-fonts-kalyani = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: %{name}-kalyani < 04.1-4
%description -n %{fontname}-kalyani-fonts
The Kalyani font package contains fonts for the display of
@@ -108,6 +114,7 @@
Group: User Interface/X
Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
License: GPLv3+ with exceptions
+Provides: %{fontname}-fonts-anjalioldlipi = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: %{name}-anjalioldlipi < 04.1-4
%description -n %{fontname}-anjalioldlipi-fonts
The Anjali OldLipi package contains fonts for the display of
@@ -145,6 +152,10 @@
%dir %{_fontdir}
%changelog
+* Fri Apr 03 2009 Pravin Satpute 04.1-6
+- bugfix 493814
+- added 'Provides' field for packages
+
* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering
- 04.1-5
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 493814] spec file doesn't provide "provides" field
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493814 Pravin Satpute changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #1 from Pravin Satpute 2009-04-03 05:35:04 EDT --- fixed in smc-fonts-04.1-6 i think it will be in tomorrow's rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 493814] spec file doesn't provide "provides" field
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493814 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-04-03 05:37:46 EDT --- While you certainly have the option as maintainer to add Provides, you should note that other fedora font packages did not add them and the maintainers of packages depending on them just fixed their deps. Which is the correct long-term fix anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 493814] spec file doesn't provide "provides" field
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493814 --- Comment #3 from Pravin Satpute 2009-04-03 05:45:02 EDT --- see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493792 I think we should keep it till f13 probably -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 96826] Add font autoinstallation support
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96826 User cmc changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'fedorafonts,hdu' |'cmc,fedorafonts,hdu' --- Additional comments from c...@openoffice.org Fri Apr 3 11:03:45 + 2009 --- We might be able to support the "language" based stuff similarly to what pango does, i.e. in our final fontconfig-using glyph fallback code collect the total failures and catalogue them by language or sommat like that and on a timer make the dbus call to flush pending "missing languages". Like the wiki page says, asking for a specific font to be installed because its missing is tricky given the way fontconfig works makes it hard to know when a font family or "good" replcement font is not really available - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 96826] Add font autoinstallation support
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96826 User cmc changed the following: What|Old value |New value OtherIssuesDependingOnTh| |97765 is| | - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 96826] Add font autoinstallation support
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96826 --- Additional comments from nmail...@openoffice.org Fri Apr 3 11:23:13 + 2009 --- I think that OO.o is a big enough font users the people working on font installations would be delighted to know its exact requirements to perfect auto-installation. If it works for OO.o it will probably work for everyone else. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 489117] Review Request: tulrich-tuffy-fonts - Generic sans font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489117 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-03 16:37:59 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 494046] New: updating fontconfig to rawhide then ANY font package causes gnome-terminal to segfault
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: updating fontconfig to rawhide then ANY font package causes gnome-terminal to segfault https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494046 Summary: updating fontconfig to rawhide then ANY font package causes gnome-terminal to segfault Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: high Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfa...@redhat.com ReportedBy: svi...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: besfa...@redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: fontconfig-2.6.0-3.fc10.i386 on an f10 i686 machine. if I update fontconfig from f10 to rawhide: 2.6.99.behdad.20090318-1.fc11 and then update ANY font package Gnome-terminals segfault. I've captured strace -p from the gnome-terminal process here: http://sethdot.org/~skvidal/misc/gterm-strace.txt I have a qemu img where I can duplicate this any time if more testing is needed. This is a big deal b/c it stops anyone from updating with yum from a gnome-terminal from f10-> rawhide/f11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 494092] New: Liberation fonts under GTK applications cannot render with antialiasing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Liberation fonts under GTK applications cannot render with antialiasing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494092 Summary: Liberation fonts under GTK applications cannot render with antialiasing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: ccha...@redhat.com ReportedBy: hcey...@batoo.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: ccha...@redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com, fedora-i18n-b...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: I am using KDE. I can use liberation fonts just fine for KDE applications. However for GTK applications fonts cannot render as antialiased. Here's a matrix of what combination works and what not: GNOME + Liberation NO KDE + Liberation OK Under KDE GTK Apps + Liberation NO Under KDE GTK Apps + Sans Serif / Monospace YES Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): rawhide + F10 How reproducible: Everytime I really would like to use Liberation fonts as I favour them on any other ones. Regards, Hasan Ceylan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
