[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-fonts-bugs-l...@redh ||at.com --- Comment #33 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-06-13 04:31:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) 4) Not an issue, but I will mention it upfront. Upstream includes the MS TrueType fonts The licensing of those fonts does not comply with our guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Legal_considerations We basically require the same freedom to distribute and modify of our fonts than of our software. Also, even if they did, we'd ask to locate the font upstream and package it separately http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Package_layout_for_fonts Bundling fonts is prohibited. Fonts must be split out cleanly so they can be installed separately and reused by other packages Also, when a project relies on default fonts from another OS or Linux distribution, you have to ask yourself if the look, feel and metrics of those fonts is required before hunting for the closest substitute. If the software does not rely on some exact font characteristic, reconfiguring it to use Fedora default fonts instead is much preferred. The Liberation fonts are metrically-equivalent to some MS fonts. However they are *not* our default font, so forcing their use will make your application stand out in Fedora. Also they have a lot less Unicode coverage than Dejavu Fonts. GNU free fonts are not installed at all by default in Fedora and are not present on liveCDs and other physical distribution media. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_FreeSans.2C_Linux_Libertine.2C_Droid_or_Liberation_fonts.3F A lot of the symbols in symbol.ttf have long been attributed standard unicode values. If this software properly references those symbols by their unicode codepoint (and not the old legacy symbol-specific codepoint) any unicode font with coverage of the associated unicode blocks will work for you (DejaVu includes most common symbols). If this is not good enough for you, you can look at openoffice's opensymbol (and open a bug dejavu-side to request the missing symbol). Lastly, if you have all those problems, that's probably because this software does not use fontconfig. Fontconfig has been the default font management stack for many years on modern Unixes and anything using X. It will locate for you the most appropriate installed font transparently. Using something else is broken by design nowadays, and you'll have no end of font-related problems till the software is switched to use fontconfig (unlike under windows, the font complement varies from Unix to Unix and release to release, Unix font Unicode coverage is not and won't ever be exactly the same as windows fonts, etc). The only correct mid-term solution is getting this software ported to fontconfig, usually using a higher-level library like pango-cairo. (and if it manages PDFs is should probably take a look at poppler too) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 455510] Undisplayable glyphs on Wikipedia
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455510 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-06-13 04:39:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) I believe this is the new feature that was mentioned: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutoFontsAndMimeInstaller This feature mostly works for gnome-based apps nowadays. Not sure what firefox uses. You should ask in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467729 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 455510] Undisplayable glyphs on Wikipedia
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455510 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gecko-bugs-nob...@fedorapro ||ject.org, ||walt...@verbum.org Component|dejavu-fonts|firefox AssignedTo|besfa...@redhat.com |gecko-bugs-nob...@fedorapro ||ject.org --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-06-13 04:46:28 EDT --- Moving to Firefox component as we do have fonts supporting Phœnician in the distro nowadays so it should plug in the autofonts install framework and propose to install them (@ben: adding Phœnician to dejavu would be nice though) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 22268] New: [RFE] Add Phœnician support
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22268 Summary: [RFE] Add Phœnician support Product: DejaVu Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: General AssignedTo: dejavu-b...@lists.freedesktop.org ReportedBy: nicolas.mail...@laposte.net CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com See http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455510 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 505757] file does not identify properly some pcf.gz files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505757 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-fonts-bugs-l...@redh ||at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 505758] New: inconsistent opentype font label
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: inconsistent opentype font label https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505758 Summary: inconsistent opentype font label Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: file AssignedTo: dnovo...@redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mail...@laposte.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com, dnovo...@redhat.com Blocks: 473302 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: file identifies OTF font files as OpenType font data (trailing space) when the label for TTF font files is TrueType font data (no trailing space) Please make them consistent Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): file-5.03-2.fc12.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 505759] file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with groff
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505759 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|file does not identify |file does not identify |properly some pfa files |properly some pfa files ||shipped with groff -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 505759] New: file does not identify properly some pfa files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: file does not identify properly some pfa files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505759 Summary: file does not identify properly some pfa files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: file AssignedTo: dnovo...@redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mail...@laposte.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com, dnovo...@redhat.com Blocks: 473302 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: file thinks the pfa files in groff-1.18.1.4-17.fc11.x86_64.rpm are PostScript document text conforming DSC level 3.0 They should be identified as PostScript Type 1 font text Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): file-5.03-2.fc12.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 505762] New: file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with ghostscript
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with ghostscript https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505762 Summary: file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with ghostscript Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: file AssignedTo: dnovo...@redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mail...@laposte.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com, dnovo...@redhat.com Blocks: 473302 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: file thinks the pfa files in ghostscript-fonts-5.50-22.fc12.noarch.rpm are PostScript document text (for example hrscc.pfa) They should be identified as PostScript Type 1 font text Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): file-5.03-2.fc12.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 505759] file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with groff
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505759 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-06-13 11:49:55 EDT --- Full list: ./usr/share/groff/1.18.1.4/font/devps/symbolsl.pfa PostScript document text conforming DSC level 3.0 groff-1.18.1.4-17.fc11.x86_64.rpm ./usr/share/groff/1.18.1.4/font/devps/zapfdr.pfa PostScript document text conforming DSC level 3.0 groff-1.18.1.4-17.fc11.x86_64.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 505762] file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with ghostscript
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505762 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-06-13 11:49:28 EDT --- Full list ./usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/hrger.pfa PostScript document text ghostscript-fonts-5.50-22.fc12.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/hrgrr.pfa PostScript document text ghostscript-fonts-5.50-22.fc12.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/hritr.pfa PostScript document text ghostscript-fonts-5.50-22.fc12.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/hrpld.pfa PostScript document text ghostscript-fonts-5.50-22.fc12.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/hrpldi.pfa PostScript document text ghostscript-fonts-5.50-22.fc12.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/hrplt.pfa PostScript document text ghostscript-fonts-5.50-22.fc12.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/hrplti.pfa PostScript document text ghostscript-fonts-5.50-22.fc12.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/hrscc.pfa PostScript document text ghostscript-fonts-5.50-22.fc12.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/hrscs.pfa PostScript document text ghostscript-fonts-5.50-22.fc12.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 505757] file does not identify properly some pcf.gz files shipped in japanese-bitmap-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505757 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|file does not identify |file does not identify |properly some pcf.gz files |properly some pcf.gz files ||shipped in ||japanese-bitmap-fonts --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-06-13 11:50:44 EDT --- Full list ./usr/share/fonts/japanese-bitmap/kaname-latin1.pcf.gz empty japanese-bitmap-fonts-0.20080710-5.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/fonts/japanese-bitmap/knm12p.pcf.gz empty japanese-bitmap-fonts-0.20080710-5.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/fonts/japanese-bitmap/knm12pb.pcf.gz empty japanese-bitmap-fonts-0.20080710-5.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/fonts/japanese-bitmap/knmzn12x.pcf.gz empty japanese-bitmap-fonts-0.20080710-5.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/fonts/japanese-bitmap/knmzn12xb.pcf.gz empty japanese-bitmap-fonts-0.20080710-5.fc11.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 505764] New: file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with a2ps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with a2ps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505764 Summary: file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with a2ps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: file AssignedTo: dnovo...@redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mail...@laposte.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com, dnovo...@redhat.com Blocks: 473302 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: file thinks the pfa files in ghostscript-fonts-5.50-22.fc12.noarch.rpm are PostScript document text They should be identified as PostScript Type 1 font text Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): file-5.03-2.fc12.x86_64 Full list: ./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/pcrb-o.pfa PostScript document text a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm ./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/pcrbo-o.pfa PostScript document text a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm ./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/pcrr-o.pfa PostScript document text a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm ./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/pcrro-o.pfa PostScript document text a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm ./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/phvb-o.pfa PostScript document text a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm ./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/phvbo-o.pfa PostScript document text a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm ./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/phvr-o.pfa PostScript document text a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm ./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/phvro-o.pfa PostScript document text a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm ./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/ptmb-o.pfa PostScript document text a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm ./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/ptmbi-o.pfa PostScript document text a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm ./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/ptmr-o.pfa PostScript document text a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm ./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/ptmri-o.pfa PostScript document text a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 505765] New: file does not identify properly some pfb files shipped in texlive-texmf-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: file does not identify properly some pfb files shipped in texlive-texmf-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505765 Summary: file does not identify properly some pfb files shipped in texlive-texmf-fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: file AssignedTo: dnovo...@redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mail...@laposte.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com, dnovo...@redhat.com Blocks: 473302 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: file thinks some pfb files in texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm are 8086 relocatable (Microsoft) They should be identified as PostScript Type 1 font program data Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): file-5.03-2.fc12.x86_64 Full list: ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcb10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcbx10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcbx12.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcbx5.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcbx6.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcbx7.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcbx8.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcbx9.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcbxsl1.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcbxti1.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmccsc10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmccsc8.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmccsc9.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcinch7.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcitt10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcsl10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcsl12.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcsl8.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcsl9.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcsltt1.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcss10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcss12.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcss17.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcss8.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcss9.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcssbx1.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcssdc1.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcssi10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcssi12.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcssi17.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcssi8.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcssi9.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cmcyr/cmcssq8.pfb 8086 relocatable
[Bug 505765] file does not identify properly some pfb files shipped in texlive-texmf-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505765 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-06-13 12:03:39 EDT --- ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csti10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csti12.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csti7.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csti8.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csti9.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/cstt10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/cstt12.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/cstt8.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/cstt9.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csu10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm ./usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/cs/csvtt10.pfb 8086 relocatable texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-28.fc11.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 505775] New: file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with enscript
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with enscript https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505775 Summary: file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with enscript Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: file AssignedTo: dnovo...@redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mail...@laposte.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com, dnovo...@redhat.com Blocks: 473302 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: file thinks the pfa file in enscript-1.6.4-12.fc11.x86_64.rpm is a PostScript document text conforming DSC level 3.0, type EPS It should be identified as PostScript Type 1 font text Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): file-5.03-2.fc12.x86_64 Full list: ./usr/share/enscript/afm/matrix.pfa PostScript document text conforming DSC level 3.0, type EPS enscript-1.6.4-12.fc11.x86_64.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 102652] Fonts in directory with name having underscore character in it, are not found
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102652 --- Additional comments from frope...@openoffice.org Sat Jun 13 20:34:06 + 2009 --- I reverted the name of the directory to it's old one, including underscore characters. As before, OO Writer didn't show those fonts. Then I ran fc-cache as my normal user. The fonts now show up as they should. The problem is solved. I don't understand, though, why I can add a directory without underscore characters in the name, and the fonts in it are found, whereas directories _with_ underscore in their names are not read. Should this still be considered a bug? If so, is it a Fedora or OOo bug? Thanks for the help in solving my problem. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 102652] Fonts in directory with name having underscore character in it, are not found
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102652 User kpalagin changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'fedorafonts,kpalagin'|'eroshin,fedorafonts,kpala | |gin,pmike' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
