[Bug 539896] [abrt] crash detected in control-center-1:2.28.1-4.fc12 (pango extents)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539896 --- Comment #3 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-12-10 02:18:52 EDT --- Might have been fixed in 1.26.1 pango update. Can't tell from the trace. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 541888] Fontforge crashes when loading font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541888 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-09 17:56:57 EDT --- Strange. I didn't do anything at all... ;( I guess we close this as a mystery? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 542461] Review Request: digna-fonts - Handwriting font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542461 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-12-09 16:56:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Sorry for taking so long to review, I monitor fedora-fonts-bugs-list but > > only > > check for "wild" font package submissions when I have some free time. > > No problem. I'm not a font packager and I missed the suggestion to CC the > fedora-fonts-bugs-list. > > > Anyway, review : > > > > 1. (comment) The font could probably be classified as cursive, but then the > > boundary between "fantasy handwriting" and "realistic handwriting" is a bit > > fuzzy > > See /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/fontconfig-generics.txt > > I choose "fantasy" because I browsed Fedora CVS for other handwriting fonts > and > this is what I found: > > brettfont-fonts: There is no fontconfig.conf > http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/brettfont-fonts/devel/ > > sj-fonts: "fantasy" > http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/sj-fonts/devel/ > > dustin-domestic-manners-fonts: "fantasy" > http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/devel/ If you want to say "handwriting" the correct generic is "cursive" in fontconfig and in css. "fantasy" is just where we dump fonts we can not categorize otherwise. > > 4. (blocking) Since this font is distributed via the Open Font LiBrary > > project, > > the package should be named oflb-dignas-handwriting-fonts > > I renamed the package, but I found really a lot of fonts in Fedora CVS that do > not comply with this guideline. For example the aforementioned brettfont, > icelandic-fonts, asana-math-fonts, roadstencil-fonts, sportrop, etc that are > also distributed via the Open Font Library project. If you knew how I wished their packagers fixed those to comply with our naming guidelines (grumbles)… This is all stuff that antedates the formal font package naming guideline that was adopted last year. New packages can't use old problems as excuse to introduce new ones. > http://musuruan.fedorapeople.org/oflb-dignas-handwriting-fonts.spec > http://musuruan.fedorapeople.org/oflb-dignas-handwriting-fonts-20031109-2.fc12.src.rpm Will check those ASAP -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 542461] Review Request: digna-fonts - Handwriting font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542461 Andrea Musuruane changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(musur...@gmail.co | |m) | --- Comment #4 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-12-09 15:33:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Sorry for taking so long to review, I monitor fedora-fonts-bugs-list but only > check for "wild" font package submissions when I have some free time. No problem. I'm not a font packager and I missed the suggestion to CC the fedora-fonts-bugs-list. > Anyway, review : > > 1. (comment) The font could probably be classified as cursive, but then the > boundary between "fantasy handwriting" and "realistic handwriting" is a bit > fuzzy > See /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/fontconfig-generics.txt I choose "fantasy" because I browsed Fedora CVS for other handwriting fonts and this is what I found: brettfont-fonts: There is no fontconfig.conf http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/brettfont-fonts/devel/ sj-fonts: "fantasy" http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/sj-fonts/devel/ dustin-domestic-manners-fonts: "fantasy" http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/devel/ > 2. (comment) The fontconfig templates have been tweaked a little in > fontpackages-devel, though the old templates you used will still work fine > > 3. (blocking) Since the font family name is "Digna's Handwriting" the package > should be named *dignas-handwriting-fonts > > 4. (blocking) Since this font is distributed via the Open Font LiBrary > project, > the package should be named oflb-dignas-handwriting-fonts I renamed the package, but I found really a lot of fonts in Fedora CVS that do not comply with this guideline. For example the aforementioned brettfont, icelandic-fonts, asana-math-fonts, roadstencil-fonts, sportrop, etc that are also distributed via the Open Font Library project. > 5. (non-blocking) There is no usable licensing statement in the font file, and > it is not distributed with a detached .txt licensing file, so the only > licensing trace is the OFL logo on OFLB. Since a web site can vanish at any > time it would be nice to ask upstream to distribute the font file with a > detached .txt licensing file in a zip archive (even better if the licensing > info is also added to the font metadata). If upstream does not want to joining > the copy of a mail where they state the font is OFL to the package as %doc > would be better than nothing. > > 6. (non-blocking) fontlint is not happy with this font, it has some problems > upstream should look at (cf attached repo-font-audit report) > > 7. (non-blocking) repo-font-audit detected partial lang coverage in the font, > it'd be nice if upstream completed the partial languages (though, at this > date, > it may be difficult) I'll mail upstream about this, but I'm not confident at all that your points will be addressed. Upstream seems to have made only this font in its lifetime and it did it a long ago. > 8. (non-blocking) please add a page describing this font on the wiki so it is > documented with other Fedora fonts: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#1 > Since you're self-packaging the font, it does not need to be very exhautive, > just to provide minimal info about the font https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OFLB_Dignas_Handwriting_fonts Thanks for the review! http://musuruan.fedorapeople.org/oflb-dignas-handwriting-fonts.spec http://musuruan.fedorapeople.org/oflb-dignas-handwriting-fonts-20031109-2.fc12.src.rpm Changelog: - Changed package name to comply to Font Packaging Guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 541792] Review Request: woff - Encoding and Decoding for Web Open Font Format(Woff)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541792 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-09 12:44:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 541793] Review Request: woffTools - Tool for manipulating and examining WOFF files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541793 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-09 12:45:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 545824] Boldface not working with some sizes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545824 --- Comment #2 from Cong Ma 2009-12-09 08:01:48 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=377173) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=377173) Screenshot (14pt). Neither OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 545824] Boldface not working with some sizes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545824 --- Comment #1 from Cong Ma 2009-12-09 08:00:50 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=377172) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=377172) Screenshot (12pt). Both OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 545824] New: Boldface not working with some sizes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Boldface not working with some sizes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545824 Summary: Boldface not working with some sizes Product: Fedora Version: 12 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: cjkuni-fonts AssignedTo: ccha...@redhat.com ReportedBy: frigoris...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: ccha...@redhat.com, phu...@redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=377170) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=377170) Screenshot (11pt). UMing was problematic while UKai OK. Description of problem: Text in boldface cannot be correctly shown in UKai and UMing font families when certain font sizes are used. Instead, they are shown as normal characters with slightly larger spacing between them. For example, in 11pts, UMing boldface is not working, while UKai works. Both font families work fine in 12pts, yet neither works in 14pts. In the screenshots to be uploaded later, the same text excerpt was copied in OpenOffice.org Writer in order to show the idiosyncrasy. The filenames (w/o the ".png" part) indicates the size used. Each screenshot shows two paragraphs of identical texts, both with the first sentence set to boldface in Oo.o Writer. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-29.fc12 How reproducible: Always Actual results: "Boldface" displayed just like non-boldface, with slightly larger character spacing. Expected results: "Boldface" text should have been displayed in boldface, duh. Additional info: Non-CJK characters are affected too. Another font, the WenQuanYi Zen Hei (package name: wqy-zenhei-fonts), doesn't display this erroneous behavior. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 541792] Review Request: woff - Encoding and Decoding for Web Open Font Format(Woff)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541792 --- Comment #7 from sandeep shedmake 2009-12-09 06:14:30 EDT --- New Package CVS Request Package Name: woff Short Description: Encoding and Decoding for WOFF file format Owners: sandeeps, pnemade Branches: F-11, F-12 InitialCC: i18n-team, fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 541793] Review Request: woffTools - Tool for manipulating and examining WOFF files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541793 --- Comment #5 from sandeep shedmake 2009-12-09 06:14:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: woffTools Short Description: Tool for manipulating and examining WOFF files Owners: sandeeps, pnemade Branches: F-11, F-12 InitialCC: i18n-team, fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 541792] Review Request: woff - Encoding and Decoding for Web Open Font Format(Woff)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541792 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-12-09 05:32:47 EDT --- Please also put the fonts sig in CC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 541793] Review Request: woffTools - Tool for manipulating and examining WOFF files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541793 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-12-09 05:33:26 EDT --- Please also put the fonts sig in InitialCC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 541792] Review Request: woff - Encoding and Decoding for Web Open Font Format(Woff)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541792 sandeep shedmake changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from sandeep shedmake 2009-12-09 05:25:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request Package Name: woff Short Description: Encoding and Decoding for WOFF file format Owners: sandeeps, pnemade Branches: F-11, F-12 InitialCC: i18n-team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 541793] Review Request: woffTools - Tool for manipulating and examining WOFF files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541793 sandeep shedmake changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from sandeep shedmake 2009-12-09 05:26:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: woffTools Short Description: Tool for manipulating and examining WOFF files Owners: sandeeps, pnemade Branches: F-11, F-12 InitialCC: i18n-team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 529594] [CJK] pango uses different fonts for LATIN and COMMON glyphs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 --- Comment #31 from fujiwara 2009-12-09 05:01:52 EDT --- Filed the upstreamed bug in pango side at the moment. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=604149 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 500563] [si_LK][GPOS] U0DB8 U0DDA font shape has error
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500563 --- Comment #5 from Parag 2009-12-09 04:29:58 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=377125) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=377125) correct rendering in f-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 500563] [si_LK][GPOS] U0DB8 U0DDA font shape has error
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500563 Parag changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 500569] [si_LK][GPOS] Delete 0D[0-F][A-D] 0DDA need to press backspace key three times
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500569 Parag changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Parag 2009-12-09 04:21:29 EDT --- This bug is not valid. See Unicode chart http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0D80.pdf where you can see U0DDA itself composed of U0DD9 and U0DCA So we need to press 3 times backspace. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 529594] [CJK] pango uses different fonts for LATIN and COMMON glyphs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 fujiwara changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #375394|0 |1 is obsolete|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 529594] [CJK] pango uses different fonts for LATIN and COMMON glyphs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529594 --- Comment #30 from fujiwara 2009-12-09 03:35:28 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=377115) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=377115) Patch for pango compcharset Revised the patch. Now this pango patch also could support that 'compmode' is strong. VL Gothic ja strong all Then pango latin, common, hira/kana, greek, etc could use ja fonts on ja locale. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
