[Bug 468618] A bit over-enthusiastic splitting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468618 Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|rawhide |10 --- Comment #5 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2008-11-25 23:16:17 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-06-25 23:48:44 EDT --- Actually it is worse that that since currently the main packages also contain the bold (and light) fonts... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 468618] A bit over-enthusiastic splitting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468618 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|small...@get9.net |peter...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 468618] A bit over-enthusiastic splitting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468618 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-09 16:22:12 EDT --- BTW if the problem is that the current macros used in this package want to take a single font file as argument, then the subpackaging macro I wrote in dejavu yesterday could be used instead. I must admit I was thinking very hard about the un font packages when I wrote them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 468618] A bit over-enthusiastic splitting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468618 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-27 22:41:15 EDT --- Do you think we should make an exception for dotum though since it will pull in another 2.5MB for all users? 4.6M un-core-fonts-dotum-1.0.2-0.6.080608.fc10.noarch.rpm 2.5M un-core-fonts-dotumbold-1.0.2-0.6.080608.fc10.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 468618] A bit over-enthusiastic splitting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468618 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-27 23:45:10 EDT --- I don't like exceptions much, you end up removing them later generally. And I tend to believe that anyone who's actually interested in dotum will want the bold too. I suppose dotum is a special case because want to install korean support for everyone by default, even for people who didn't ask for it (but is it really ok to provide korean without bold when we have it available?). If we're that short of space for F10 you can make it an exception, but IMHO it will end up in the default install set in a few releases anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 468618] A bit over-enthusiastic splitting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468618 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-26 15:29:52 EDT --- (and same for light when it's available like for dinaru) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
