[Bug 480446] [e16] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480446


Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||RAWHIDE




--- Comment #5 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no  2009-02-23 17:31:07 
EDT ---
I hope it's ok now.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 480446] [e16] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480446





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net  2009-02-18 
14:33:13 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in interesting ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 480446] [e16] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-02-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480446


Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||Reopened
 Status|CLOSED  |ASSIGNED
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |




--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net  2009-02-15 
13:13:05 EDT ---
Latest spec shows a dep on a dejavu package name that will go away before F11
beta

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 480446] [e16] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-02-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480446


Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution||RAWHIDE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 480446] [e16] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480446





--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net  2009-01-19 
05:24:33 EDT ---
[Natural language informal translation]

In this issue you're just warned font packages you depend on have been/will be
renamed shortly, so your package dependencies will break. There is not much to
do except changing your deps once that happens (dejavu has been renamed,
liberation has in koji but has not hit rawhide yet, smc had been
too, and you may depend on others yet)

[Just to be 100% clear I didn't ask for this last renaming run, FPC demanded
naming changes for consistency against my advice, I'm only the good little
soldier who gets to implement their decision and be yelled at, so if you're not
happy complain at them not me.]

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 480446] [e16] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480446


Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||fedora-fonts-bugs-l...@redh
   ||at.com
 Blocks||480443
   Flag||needinfo?




--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net  2009-01-17 
08:00:47 EDT ---
FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our
de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming
changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon
(including recently created packages)

We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change
your dependencies accordingly.

See also
— http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming
—
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13)
—
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F

To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been
renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those
provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps
remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full
won't break and can be adapted at your leasure.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list