Re: Apache Test Page

2008-02-03 Thread Rahul Sundaram

Anand Capur wrote:
Do you think we should add something like this to the bottom of the test 
pages, so MAYBE people will understand that we don't own the websites?





Looks good. Might file that against the httpd package as a RFE in bugzilla.

Rahul

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Apache Test Page

2008-02-03 Thread Anand Capur
Do you think we should add something like this to the bottom of the test
pages, so MAYBE people will understand that we don't own the websites?
Note:

Fedora is an Operating System and it is used to power this website; however,
the webserver is owned by the domain owner and not Fedora. *If you have
issues with the content of this site, contact the owner of the domain, not
Fedora!*

Unless this server is on the fedoraproject.org domain, Fedora doesn't have
anything to do with the content on this webserver or any e-mails that
directed you to this site.

For example, if this website is www.example.com, you would find the owner of
the example.com domain at the following WHOIS server:

http://www.internic.net/whois.html

What do you think? I got that from the CentOS test page.
-Anand
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


fedora.org?

2008-02-03 Thread Anand Capur
Is there any way we can get this domain back? Is Fedora a registered
trademark of ours? I think it would much be better on our site, instead of
yeah, you know what I mean. (See fedora.org)
-Anand
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: fedora.org?

2008-02-03 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Sunday 03 February 2008, Anand Capur wrote:
> Is there any way we can get this domain back? Is Fedora a registered
> trademark of ours? I think it would much be better on our site, instead of
> yeah, you know what I mean. (See fedora.org)
> -Anand

We have never had fedora.org  It was taken when fedora project was started 

Dennis

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: fedora.org?

2008-02-03 Thread Matthew Galgoci
> Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 17:05:23 -0500
> From: Anand Capur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
> To: fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
> Subject: fedora.org?
>
> Is there any way we can get this domain back? Is Fedora a registered
> trademark of ours? I think it would much be better on our site, instead of
> yeah, you know what I mean. (See fedora.org)

We never "had" that domain, so there is no "getting it back".

-- 
Matthew Galgoci
Network Operations
Red Hat, Inc
919.754.3700 x44155

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: fedora.org?

2008-02-03 Thread Anand Capur
On 2/3/08, Matthew Galgoci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 17:05:23 -0500
> > From: Anand Capur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
> > To: fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
> > Subject: fedora.org?
> >
> > Is there any way we can get this domain back? Is Fedora a registered
> > trademark of ours? I think it would much be better on our site, instead
> of
> > yeah, you know what I mean. (See fedora.org)
>
> We never "had" that domain, so there is no "getting it back".
>
> --
> Matthew Galgoci
> Network Operations
> Red Hat, Inc
> 919.754.3700 x44155


Well, can't you do trademark claims with ICANN? I didn't literally mean "Get
it back" since yeah, we never had it.
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: fedora.org?

2008-02-03 Thread Yaakov Nemoy
2008/2/3 Anand Capur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 2/3/08, Mike McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Anand Capur wrote:
> >
> > > On 2/3/08, Matthew Galgoci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 17:05:23 -0500
> > > > > From: Anand Capur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Reply-To: fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
> > > > > To: fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
> > > > > Subject: fedora.org?
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there any way we can get this domain back? Is Fedora a registered
> > > > > trademark of ours? I think it would much be better on our site,
> instead
> > > > of
> > > > > yeah, you know what I mean. (See fedora.org)
> > > >
> > > > We never "had" that domain, so there is no "getting it back".
> > > >
> > >
> > > Well, can't you do trademark claims with ICANN? I didn't literally mean
> "Get
> > > it back" since yeah, we never had it.
> > >
> >
> > Nope, but without the "project" in fedora project, they could use it
> > against us.  I believe they existed before we did.
> >
> > -Mike
>
> Even though we use "Fedora" as our OS name now?..We can't even get them
> for using it against the TLD terms since .org's uses are Nonprofits;
> personal sites; open-source projects;

Ugh, not this question again.  ICANN removed that restriction on
TLD's, so anyone can have a .com, org or a .net with impunity.  The
only restrictions are on .edu, .gov, and .XX where XX is your nation
code, plus other less oft used TLDs.

IANAL, but Fedora by itself is not a trademark.  Fedora doesn't even
have a perfect hold on the Fedora Project moniker either.  Google it
and you'll see what I mean.

Bottom line: Who cares.  Things like this are the hazards of having an
open and free internet.  Now quit clogging my tubes with this ;)

-Yaakov

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: fedora.org?

2008-02-03 Thread Mike McGrath
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Anand Capur wrote:

> On 2/3/08, Matthew Galgoci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 17:05:23 -0500
> > > From: Anand Capur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Reply-To: fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
> > > To: fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
> > > Subject: fedora.org?
> > >
> > > Is there any way we can get this domain back? Is Fedora a registered
> > > trademark of ours? I think it would much be better on our site, instead
> > of
> > > yeah, you know what I mean. (See fedora.org)
> >
> > We never "had" that domain, so there is no "getting it back".
> >
>
> Well, can't you do trademark claims with ICANN? I didn't literally mean "Get
> it back" since yeah, we never had it.
>

Nope, but without the "project" in fedora project, they could use it
against us.  I believe they existed before we did.

-Mike

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: fedora.org?

2008-02-03 Thread Anand Capur
On 2/3/08, Mike McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Anand Capur wrote:
>
> > On 2/3/08, Matthew Galgoci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 17:05:23 -0500
> > > > From: Anand Capur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Reply-To: fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
> > > > To: fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
> > > > Subject: fedora.org?
> > > >
> > > > Is there any way we can get this domain back? Is Fedora a registered
> > > > trademark of ours? I think it would much be better on our site,
> instead
> > > of
> > > > yeah, you know what I mean. (See fedora.org)
> > >
> > > We never "had" that domain, so there is no "getting it back".
> > >
> >
> > Well, can't you do trademark claims with ICANN? I didn't literally mean
> "Get
> > it back" since yeah, we never had it.
> >
>
> Nope, but without the "project" in fedora project, they could use it
> against us.  I believe they existed before we did.
>
> -Mike


Even though we use "Fedora" as our OS name now?..We can't even get them
for using it against the TLD terms since .org's uses are Nonprofits;
personal sites; open-source projects;
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


infrastructure news ready for FWN#118

2008-02-03 Thread Huzaifa Sidhpurwala
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi All,
  News from fedora-infrastructure-list is ready for FWN#118
- --
Regards,
Huzaifa Sidhpurwala, RHCE, CCNA (IRC: huzaifas)
Help Desk APAC Team Lead,
Research and Development Lead,
Global Help Desk, Pune
Phone: +617 3514 8125 (UTC +5.5)

GnuPG Fingerprint:
3A0F DAFB 9279 02ED 273B FFE9 CC70 DCF2 DA5B DAE5

Visit the Help Desk portal at : http://helpdesk.corp.redhat.com

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHpqkszHDc8tpb2uURAjuiAJ4+kqghHF0zmjJuUikC1TjzxdvqTgCfTyFS
xQz0Q1egNgPbrInMf7NdcgE=
=+/Fp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list