Fedora 9 repository DVD
Hi, I want to create a Fedora 9 repository DVD. It's necessary, specially for my country. Because 95% of computer user has not any internet connection in our country. Can anyone help me with this? I hit Google, and found this http://fedora-tn.org/?q=node/63 . But this article is too old, and based on Fedora Core 4. So, I am confusing. Thank you. -- Angel GPG key: 0xC4639705 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AshiqurRahman ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Fedora 9 repository DVD
On Monday 19 May 2008 10:36:48 Angel wrote: > I want to create a Fedora 9 repository DVD. It's necessary, specially for > my country. Because 95% of computer user has not any internet connection in > our country. Can anyone help me with this? I hit Google, and found this Do you want to have the Fedora Everything repository on DVD? Then the Fedora Unity project already did this for you: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2008-May/msg00010.html Regards, Till signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
I need a package review done
Any new folks looking to get their hands dirty a bit? I need a package review done of email2trac which is the software I'm going to use to fulfill the need in ticket https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/198 The review bug is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447338 I would appreciate it! -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
changes at planet fedora
Hi all, I’m making some changes with how we build up the list of folks/rss feeds for the fedora planet. We’re making it more self-service and a bit easier to maintain for the admin group (and specifically easier for me to put up with). For all the people currently on the planet please follow these instructions to make sure your feed stays on there: http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/docs/planet-addition.html These instructions will be added to the wiki after the wiki migration happens next week. Let me know what problems you have, too. thanks, -sv ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
F10?
So F9 is out the door and we had a very exciting last 6 months. Here's the short list: * FAS2 * /mnt/koji migration and deployment * Backup system up and running * Collaboration servers brought up (gobby and asterisk POC) * UTC switch The focus for this last release was mostly around sanity. Cleaning up some configs, things like that. We actually did a very good job of that. All in all I feel it was a good release. So my question to the team, what would you all like to see over the next 6 months? -Mike ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: F10?
On Monday 19 May 2008, Mike McGrath wrote: > So F9 is out the door and we had a very exciting last 6 months. Here's > the short list: > > * FAS2 > * /mnt/koji migration and deployment > * Backup system up and running > * Collaboration servers brought up (gobby and asterisk POC) > * UTC switch > > The focus for this last release was mostly around sanity. Cleaning up > some configs, things like that. We actually did a very good job of that. > > All in all I feel it was a good release. So my question to the team, what > would you all like to see over the next 6 months? new ca infrastructure. Dennis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: F10?
On 2008-05-19 10:27:52 PM, Mike McGrath wrote: > All in all I feel it was a good release. So my question to the team, what > would you all like to see over the next 6 months? * New wiki :-) * More/better documentation * FAS improvements + Certificate Authority * A more complete test environment? * Asterisk coolness? Thanks, Ricky pgpbJ8SLsLyMq.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: F10?
Mike McGrath wrote: So F9 is out the door and we had a very exciting last 6 months. Here's the short list: * FAS2 * /mnt/koji migration and deployment * Backup system up and running * Collaboration servers brought up (gobby and asterisk POC) * UTC switch The focus for this last release was mostly around sanity. Cleaning up some configs, things like that. We actually did a very good job of that. All in all I feel it was a good release. So my question to the team, what would you all like to see over the next 6 months? I agree, the release went smoothly, compared to what I remember a year back when I was helping out. Some of the 'would be nice' items I guess are: * Logical separation of apps/services - i.e. app2's load really spikes when msgmerge runs (I'm assuming this is l10n stuff, why should this have to run on the same server that runs the wiki etc, if possible it'd be nice to have a similar setup like rel-eng has) * Better load balancing, I'm assuming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Architecture is still technically correct, it'd be nice to have the proxy servers randomly choosing an App server, is this even possible? * Something that Debian has as a service to packagers is machines of various architectures that can be used for debugging/solving build problems, koji scratch builds solve part of the problem, but access to the chroot or something like that would be even better, I know people offer this sort of setup on a 'by request' basis, but if we retiring builders etc in the future, instead of sending them to the graveyard, this is an option. And of course some of the upcoming stuff: * Mediawiki * New DB Server for Koji * Network storage for tarball uploads * Elections App (expect a call for testers soon) - Nigel ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: F10?
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 03:50:49PM +1200, Nigel Jones wrote: > * Better load balancing, I'm assuming > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Architecture is still > technically correct, it'd be nice to have the proxy servers randomly > choosing an App server, is this even possible? Most services are using apache mod_balancer now, so requests first hit a proxy server, then are load-balanced across each of the app servers for each app. -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
