Re: Blog syndication for GSoC - ers
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 3:01 AM, Karsten Wade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It would be but I get the feeling that some aren't joining or aren't allowed to because of google rules (I have no idea about either of these, someone please correct me) Well, AIUI Google's whole point of getting the students connected months ago was so they could join the projects and so forth. If there are any students who haven't got their FAS account ... why? Etc. Google mainly wants the students to fit in with the project, under our own regular processes. Where they exert influence is in, for example, requiring the students to work on their own code and not be a a team working on a module, etc. I presume this is mainly to let them tie expenditure to effort directly, without team effects. This is more or less 'it' in a nutshell. There is one extra requirement that they have a uploadable set of files, mainly for legal reasons. That's pretty much all there is to it. In my case, I've asked pavel to email me patches for git. The reasoning is that we'll have a log of emails complete with files that can be tarballed and submitted to Google easily. I've asked him not to ask for permission to participate in our git instance, although he really does need to sign up for our trac. He also needs to be signed up for the wiki, and a few mailing lists. His participation is supposed to be the same as anyone else's with the notable exception of the 'hgsmolt' group. -Yaakov ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: PHP Security Tweaks
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Mike McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Side note about this, it seems to have broken OpenID support. I've reverted to a default configuration so ricky can continue testing. If you've got a moment could you hook up with him at some point and find out exactly what configuration is causing the problem? I checked the file listing in the OpenID packages and I bet the open_basedir wasn't letting the OpenID stuff have access to the files it needed. I can modify that and allow access to those directories it most likely needs. It's a trip to the zoo day with the kids, but I will cross paths with Ricky later today/this evening and get this sorted out. Thanks! Jeffrey ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: OpenID and CLA
On Mon, 26 May 2008, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: You don't have to limit the choices to only accept Fedora OpenID identities or allow any OpenID identity. It should be possible to limit out acceptance of OpenID identities to ones that have previously been associated with a FAS account. So before you could use your Yahoo or MyOpenID identity to login to the Fedora Wiki you'd have to log into FAS and register any other identities that you'd like to use. I don't know enough about the MediaWiki OpenID plugin to know if that would be easy or hard to do. You can only allow or deny certain OpenID servers, as far as I can tell. -- ian ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: OpenID and CLA
On Mon, 26 May 2008, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote: Just doing some thinking ... If we want to move our OpenID acceptance outside of Fedora's OpenID server, we'll have a blocker with the CLA. AIUI, we need someone to knowingly accept the CLA and have that tied to a Real Name and email address in our database. Right? Correct. However, OpenID could be a good way to get permissions to Talk: pages. That is a great way to get feedback from drive-bys, the kind of people who might take advantage of an OpenID to make a minor change on a page. nod I looked briefly into this but haven't totally come to a solution yet. Content in Talk: could be treated procedurally as we do bug reports. Maybe we can have a WikiLicense type of thing (FedoraProject:Copyrights link enough?) for that? Either way, Talk: could be a discussion area, cf. mailing lists and bugzilla, that may produce content. If someone gives specific wording and we want to use it, and now or later modify it, redistribute it, etc., it needs to be under the CLA and site license. This is comparable to receiving a patch via bugzilla where the contributor should include licensing text. Yeah, this is both a question for legal and a question to see what is technically feasible. OpenID is great, but once again the CLA continues to be the biggest blocker to growing our contributor base. -Mike ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
OpenID and CLA
Just doing some thinking ... If we want to move our OpenID acceptance outside of Fedora's OpenID server, we'll have a blocker with the CLA. AIUI, we need someone to knowingly accept the CLA and have that tied to a Real Name and email address in our database. Right? However, OpenID could be a good way to get permissions to Talk: pages. That is a great way to get feedback from drive-bys, the kind of people who might take advantage of an OpenID to make a minor change on a page. Content in Talk: could be treated procedurally as we do bug reports. Maybe we can have a WikiLicense type of thing (FedoraProject:Copyrights link enough?) for that? Either way, Talk: could be a discussion area, cf. mailing lists and bugzilla, that may produce content. If someone gives specific wording and we want to use it, and now or later modify it, redistribute it, etc., it needs to be under the CLA and site license. This is comparable to receiving a patch via bugzilla where the contributor should include licensing text. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: OpenID and CLA
2008/5/26 Karsten 'quaid' Wade [EMAIL PROTECTED]: If we want to move our OpenID acceptance outside of Fedora's OpenID server, we'll have a blocker with the CLA. AIUI, we need someone to knowingly accept the CLA and have that tied to a Real Name and email address in our database. Right? You don't have to limit the choices to only accept Fedora OpenID identities or allow any OpenID identity. It should be possible to limit out acceptance of OpenID identities to ones that have previously been associated with a FAS account. So before you could use your Yahoo or MyOpenID identity to login to the Fedora Wiki you'd have to log into FAS and register any other identities that you'd like to use. I don't know enough about the MediaWiki OpenID plugin to know if that would be easy or hard to do. Jeff ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
