Re: fedorahosted git repo too large
On Tue, 2008-08-05 at 23:44 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: Yuan Yijun wrote: I just tried to download revisor git with this command git pull http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/revisor master. I have to repeat 4-5 times since it breaks during downloading. The .git folder is about 58MB. After git gc --aggressive it becomes only 6MB. Anyone please run gc on server? Perhaps better would be repack. There was a recent thread on the git list and one of the developers pointed out an older mail from Linus where he described gc --aggressive as mostly dumb and recommended that using something like repack -a -d -f --depth=250 --window=250 instead. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.devel/94613 That's actually a very useful article and the methods/reasons behind it sound quite sane and it could be a useful approach for us. I'll try this out on one of the smaller repos (a copy of course) and see what happens. (n.b. I've added f-infrastructure-list to CC's, that's where everyone that manages the hosted server reads :).) - Nigel -- fedora-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: fedorahosted git repo too large
Nigel Jones wrote: On Tue, 2008-08-05 at 23:44 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: Yuan Yijun wrote: I just tried to download revisor git with this command git pull http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/revisor master. I have to repeat 4-5 times since it breaks during downloading. The .git folder is about 58MB. After git gc --aggressive it becomes only 6MB. Anyone please run gc on server? Perhaps better would be repack. There was a recent thread on the git list and one of the developers pointed out an older mail from Linus where he described gc --aggressive as mostly dumb and recommended that using something like repack -a -d -f --depth=250 --window=250 instead. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.devel/94613 That's actually a very useful article and the methods/reasons behind it sound quite sane and it could be a useful approach for us. I'll try this out on one of the smaller repos (a copy of course) and see what happens. We've ended up doing this live as well and I'm happy with the few stabs I took at seeing if everything still works. Feel free to make this a regular thing on the revisor repo and I'll report if anything breaks, so that if it doesn't, this could maybe become a regular thing to do on all repos? Kind regards, Jeroen van Meeuwen -kanarip ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Wrong bugzillla component owner
I'm still listed in bugzilla as the owner of python-matplotlib, but I'm not. See: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/python-matplotlib Thanks! -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Wrong bugzillla component owner
Orion Poplawski wrote: I'm still listed in bugzilla as the owner of python-matplotlib, but I'm not. See: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/python-matplotlib Hmm... It could be that bugzilla was updated between you sending this and me looking, but jspaleta is currently the owner of python-matplotlib in bugzilla. If you see this again, feel free to ping me here or on IRC: abadger1999 -Toshio signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list