Puppet Commits

2008-08-07 Thread Nigel Jones
Sorry for all the puppet commits today, it's been driving me nuts as
well.

But what happened to 'make check' that could be run before commit?
Really what I want to do, is say "lets pretend I'm
publictest9.fedoraproject.org, what would I get and will it work?"

Is this even possible?  Can we fix it?

- Nigel

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Photo gallery

2008-08-07 Thread Nicu Buculei
At the Art team we decided to start collecting photos which can be used 
as desktop wallpapers, make a best-of-breed selection and create one or 
more packages.


The easiest way to get it running was to [ab]use a wiki page - 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/Wallpaper_Extras but we 
understand that this may not be an optimal use of the wiki and having an 
upstream maybe at fedorahosted may be a better solution.


What do you guys thing about that? A gallery plug-in for Trac? A 
stand-alone gallery? Any other solution better than using the main 
Fedora wiki?


--
nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com
Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/
Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org
my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Photo gallery

2008-08-07 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Nicu Buculei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What do you guys thing about that? A gallery plug-in for Trac? A stand-alone
> gallery? Any other solution better than using the main Fedora wiki?

I've had good luck with gallery2.  It's PHP but it's already in Fedora
(but not EPEL). AFAIK it has a decent security history (or at least as
good as PHP web apps get).

http://gallery.menalto.com/

My personal gallery is running at:

http://www.ocjtech.us/gallery2/

I've only done a few customizations, but it's highly themable so it
shouldn't be that hard to give it the "Fedora" look.

Jeff

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Photo gallery

2008-08-07 Thread Nicu Buculei

Jeffrey Ollie wrote:

On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Nicu Buculei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

What do you guys thing about that? A gallery plug-in for Trac? A stand-alone
gallery? Any other solution better than using the main Fedora wiki?


I've had good luck with gallery2.  It's PHP but it's already in Fedora
(but not EPEL). AFAIK it has a decent security history (or at least as
good as PHP web apps get).


Supposedly gallery2 has the features we need, how big of a change is to 
get it running in fedorahosted?


--
nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com
Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/
Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org
my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Photo gallery

2008-08-07 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Nicu Buculei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Nicu Buculei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> What do you guys thing about that? A gallery plug-in for Trac? A
>>> stand-alone
>>> gallery? Any other solution better than using the main Fedora wiki?
>>
>> I've had good luck with gallery2.  It's PHP but it's already in Fedora
>> (but not EPEL). AFAIK it has a decent security history (or at least as
>> good as PHP web apps get).
>
> Supposedly gallery2 has the features we need, how big of a change is to get
> it running in fedorahosted?

Firstly we'd need to get gallery2 into EPEL.  Then I think we'd want
to wait for version 2.3 of gallery2 which will let us use sqlite
databases instead of mysql / pgsql which will make provisioning (and
backup/restore) much easier.  Then also, we'll need to consider the
implications of letting people store images on fedora hosted. The
space requirements will certainly need to be figured out (hosted1 has
plenty of space at the moment but we want to make sure this is
sustainable long-term).

Jeff

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Photo gallery

2008-08-07 Thread Mike McGrath
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008, Nicu Buculei wrote:

> Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Nicu Buculei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > What do you guys thing about that? A gallery plug-in for Trac? A
> > > stand-alone
> > > gallery? Any other solution better than using the main Fedora wiki?
> >
> > I've had good luck with gallery2.  It's PHP but it's already in Fedora
> > (but not EPEL). AFAIK it has a decent security history (or at least as
> > good as PHP web apps get).
>
> Supposedly gallery2 has the features we need, how big of a change is to get it
> running in fedorahosted?
>

0 chance of that happening.  Galleries aren't part of the fedorahosted
solution.  But we can probably setup some sort of art.fedoraproject.org
site.  Couple of requirements include somehow being able to integrate it
with FAS though.

-Mike

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Photo gallery

2008-08-07 Thread Mike McGrath
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Nicu Buculei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Nicu Buculei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> What do you guys thing about that? A gallery plug-in for Trac? A
> >>> stand-alone
> >>> gallery? Any other solution better than using the main Fedora wiki?
> >>
> >> I've had good luck with gallery2.  It's PHP but it's already in Fedora
> >> (but not EPEL). AFAIK it has a decent security history (or at least as
> >> good as PHP web apps get).
> >
> > Supposedly gallery2 has the features we need, how big of a change is to get
> > it running in fedorahosted?
>
> Firstly we'd need to get gallery2 into EPEL.  Then I think we'd want
> to wait for version 2.3 of gallery2 which will let us use sqlite
> databases instead of mysql / pgsql which will make provisioning (and
> backup/restore) much easier.  Then also, we'll need to consider the
> implications of letting people store images on fedora hosted. The
> space requirements will certainly need to be figured out (hosted1 has
> plenty of space at the moment but we want to make sure this is
> sustainable long-term).
>

Actually we'll probably want to stick with mysql/pgsql so we can run the
front end on multiple hosts and store the photos on the netapp.  It'll
allow us to do most upgrades and maintanence without downtime.

-Mike

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Photo gallery

2008-08-07 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Mike McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Actually we'll probably want to stick with mysql/pgsql so we can run the
> front end on multiple hosts and store the photos on the netapp.  It'll
> allow us to do most upgrades and maintanence without downtime.

Yeah, that'd make the most sense if you're setting up
art.fedoraproject.org rather than something on Fedora Hosted.

Jeff

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Photo gallery

2008-08-07 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Mike McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Couple of requirements include somehow being able to integrate it
> with FAS though.

That should be possible, but might involve a custom plugin or something.

Jeff

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Photo gallery

2008-08-07 Thread Toshio Kuratomi

Jeffrey Ollie wrote:

On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Mike McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Couple of requirements include somehow being able to integrate it
with FAS though.


That should be possible, but might involve a custom plugin or something.



There was also art.gnome.org code that I took a glance at a year or so 
ago (it was being rewritten at the time from one php web app into a more 
complicated php web app) and, I think, ccMixter.  Also, someone 
mentioned that mediawiki actually has a photo gallery plugin but I don't 
know the security record/usefulness of that.


Nicu, what are the requirements of the gallery?

-Toshio



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Good reading on page load time

2008-08-07 Thread Mike McGrath
Here's a good read for our devs.

http://www.die.net/musings/page_load_time/

-Mike

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Photo gallery

2008-08-07 Thread Martin Sourada
On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 10:42 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> 0 chance of that happening.  Galleries aren't part of the fedorahosted
> solution.  But we can probably setup some sort of art.fedoraproject.org
> site.  Couple of requirements include somehow being able to integrate it
> with FAS though.
> 
>   -Mike
> 
The core of the whole effort is to get some hand-picked (by the fedora
art team) extra wallpapers into fedora package system, so that users
will have optionally more wallpapers to chose from available via yum. I
considered these names for the binary (sub-)packages:
 
 backgrounds-extras--

and these names for the source packages and meta-packages:
 
 backgrounds-extras-

The meta-package would require all the sub-packages of the given
category. I think this is a feasible solution to keep d/l's on updates
as low as possible and also not having some monstrous single package.

The gallery would ideally serve both for the art team (as a place to
submit their pictures for evaluation by the whole team) and users (as an
additional place for additional easy-to-download wallpapers). Thus I
think it would be nice if it has these features:

 - Categories/Subcategories
 - Ability to store big images (ca 1-6 MB), but provide user with low
transfer rate when previewing - i.e. creating thumbnails at the server
side
 - Integration with FAS
 - Some sort of rating system
 - Ability to download the full quality image easy (e.g. by one-click)
 - Probably ability to keep sources together with the resultant image in
one place (in case it's e.g. a vector graphics or a collage)
 - Maybe some tag system to let users know what's in repos and what's 
not
 - Easy upload (can be either through CLI or Web Interface)
 - Would be nice if the full quality images/sources had some nice URLs
so that we could easily fetch them either by build script or list them
as sources in RPM.

Do you think we have other requirements, Nicu?

Also following the thread here, it seems like art.fedoraproject.org
would be better solution for the gallery itself (in case we did it
ourselves combined with gallery code in fh.o), I don't know yet what
would be the best approach for upstream of the RPM packages. Copying the
selected images into fh.o, or creating some build scripts which would
fetch the images from art.fp.o and install them to system and have these
scripts on fh.o, or just have rpm fetch images and list art.fh.o as
upstream?

Any thoughts?

Martin



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


FAS authentication for Red Hat bugzilla

2008-08-07 Thread Rahul Sundaram

Hi,

Is it possible to setup $subject?  It would be nice to use my FAS 
account for everything related to Fedora. We are almost there now.


Rahul

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: FAS authentication for Red Hat bugzilla

2008-08-07 Thread Mike McGrath
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008, Rahul Sundaram wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to setup $subject?  It would be nice to use my FAS account for
> everything related to Fedora. We are almost there now.
>

Not our call unfortunately.  We could run our own bugzilla instance but
thats not as clear of a win as it seems.  Its all in Red hat's hands
though, enabling OpenID on their part would probably be the best option.

-Mike

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: FAS authentication for Red Hat bugzilla

2008-08-07 Thread Rahul Sundaram

Mike McGrath wrote:

On Thu, 7 Aug 2008, Rahul Sundaram wrote:

  

Hi,

Is it possible to setup $subject?  It would be nice to use my FAS account for
everything related to Fedora. We are almost there now.




Not our call unfortunately.  We could run our own bugzilla instance but
thats not as clear of a win as it seems.  Its all in Red hat's hands
though, enabling OpenID on their part would probably be the best option
I understand it is in Red Hat's hands. Have you talked to the people 
associated?


Rahul

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Puppet Commits

2008-08-07 Thread brett lentz
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 6:11 AM, Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for all the puppet commits today, it's been driving me nuts as
> well.
>
> But what happened to 'make check' that could be run before commit?
> Really what I want to do, is say "lets pretend I'm
> publictest9.fedoraproject.org, what would I get and will it work?"
>
> Is this even possible?  Can we fix it?
>
> - Nigel


As far as I'm aware, because we're not using an external node
classifier, we can only see what it currently gets, not what it will
get.

You can find that info by looking at /var/lib/puppet/classes.txt.

As far as testing out the changes, the only way I'm familiar with
doing that is by stopping puppetd, and running puppetd --test
--no-daemonize. Alternately, you can just send SIGUSR1 to puppetd to
force it to do a catalog run immediately, so that you aren't waiting
around for the errors..

Brett.

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: FAS authentication for Red Hat bugzilla

2008-08-07 Thread Mike McGrath
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008, Rahul Sundaram wrote:

> Mike McGrath wrote:
> > On Thu, 7 Aug 2008, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Is it possible to setup $subject?  It would be nice to use my FAS account
> > > for
> > > everything related to Fedora. We are almost there now.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Not our call unfortunately.  We could run our own bugzilla instance but
> > thats not as clear of a win as it seems.  Its all in Red hat's hands
> > though, enabling OpenID on their part would probably be the best option
> I understand it is in Red Hat's hands. Have you talked to the people
> associated?
>

I've been directed to this ticket:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=294608

Red Hat is waiting for Upstream to get the feature integrated.

-Mike

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Meeting Log - 2008-08-07

2008-08-07 Thread Ricky Zhou
20:00 -!- mmcgrath changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Infrastructure -- 
Who's here?
20:00  * ianweller 
20:00 < mmcgrath> Howdy all, who's about?
20:00  * gregdek !
20:00  * ianweller !!!1
20:00 < G> mooo
20:00  * londo is here
20:00 -!- wolfy [EMAIL PROTECTED]/wolfy] has left #fedora-meeting ["I can 
please only one person per day. Today is not your day."]
20:00 < themayor> im around
20:00  * ianweller starts screaming at his USB for not booting his eeepc
20:01 -!- cjb [EMAIL PROTECTED] has joined #fedora-meeting
20:01 -!- m_stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] has joined #fedora-meeting
20:01 < mmcgrath> themayor: gregdek: welcome, don't see you guys at the infra 
meetings that much ;-)
20:01 < mmcgrath> First up, oustanding tickets
20:01 -!- mmcgrath changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Infrastructure -- 
tickets
20:01 < mmcgrath> 
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/query?status=new&status=assigned&status=reopened&component=Hosted+Projects&order=id&desc=1
20:01  * ricky 
20:01 < zodbot>  (at fedorahosted.org)
20:01 < themayor> im just happy to finally have internet connection again, ill 
join anything at this point ;)
20:01  * kanarip !
20:02 < mmcgrath> Sorry, thats the wrong link...  Here's the right one
20:02  * dgilmore is here
20:02 < mmcgrath> 
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/query?status=new&status=assigned&status=reopened&group=milestone&keywords=%7EMeeting&order=priority
20:02 < zodbot>  (at fedorahosted.org)
20:02 < mmcgrath> First ticket
20:02 < mmcgrath> .ticket 732
20:02 < zodbot> mmcgrath: #732 (Investigate New System Monitoring Methods) - 
Fedora Infrastructure - Trac - http://tinyurl.com/69whk6
20:02 < mmcgrath> G: want to take this one?  I figure a summary of the last 
week would be good.  Its coming along much more quickly then even I had 
anticipated.
20:03  * dgilmore would like to say that when doing things like restarting 
servers and services.  please be kind and schedule downtime in nagios so we 
dont get alerts at 1am
20:03 < G> Yeah I'm actually on a slow-mo mode on this right now, got a few 
things I have to do, -noc'ers should be getting some e-mails soon though
20:03 < dgilmore> regardless of what the monitoring system is
20:04 < ricky> dgilmore: I think those were false ones last night :-(
20:04 < ricky> Or a VPN blip or something
20:04 < G> the base is up, and appears to relatively stable
20:04 < mmcgrath> ricky: I looked throught he logs and sar last night, I do 
believe it was a vpn blip.  Got into a funky mode and fixed itself.
20:04 < G> that was noc2 (tummy) all last night)
20:04 < ricky> Ah
20:04 < ricky> noc1 gave alerts for stuff on the VPN too :-(
20:04 < G> so yeah, it's progressing
20:05 < mmcgrath> G: good work, really.  I suspect we'll be fully converted 
soon.  I look forward to the -noc emails.
20:05 < mmcgrath> G: anything else?  If not we'll move on.
20:05 < G> oh for full conversion...
20:05 < G> I'd sooner hold out to September when 1.6.x is out if possible
20:06 < ricky> Hopefully, we can use the time in between to get a good baseline 
for the alert settings
20:06 < G> It provides several 'missing links'
20:06 < mmcgrath> G: any specific features we're blocking on?
20:06 < G> err hold on one sec, brain is a bit slow, and DNS just died
20:07  * mmcgrath notes we're talking about 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/zabbix/ for those who aren't familiar with the 
actual site.
20:07 < G> okay...
20:08 -!- themayor [EMAIL PROTECTED] has quit Read error: 104 (Connection reset 
by peer)
20:08 < G> 1.6 offers us: better distributed monitoring, ability to proxy 
results, encryption on the agent, able to cache DB stuff
20:08 -!- themayor [EMAIL PROTECTED] has joined #fedora-meeting
20:08 < ricky> Encryption sounds like a cool one
20:09 < mmcgrath> k, well in the meantime that just gives us all the 
opportunity to make sure that its done right the first time.
20:09 < mmcgrath> G: again, good work.
20:09 < ricky> I'm also curious as to how well distributed monitoring will 
work.  Can we get things setup so that not every single host has to be on the 
VPN?
20:09 < mmcgrath> ricky: depends on how we want to monitor it.
20:09 < mmcgrath> Anywho, next ticket :)
20:09 < mmcgrath> .ticket 395
20:09 < zodbot> mmcgrath: #395 (Audio Streaming of Fedora Board Conference 
Calls) - Fedora Infrastructure - Trac - http://tinyurl.com/5qb3gv
20:09 < mmcgrath> jcollie: any progress here?
20:09 < jcollie> nope
20:09 < mmcgrath> k, next ticket.
20:10 < mmcgrath> .ticket 446
20:10 < zodbot> mmcgrath: #446 (Possibility to add external links on spins 
page) - Fedora Infrastructure - Trac - http://tinyurl.com/3w4uwn
20:10 < mmcgrath> dgilmore: ^^^
20:10 < mmcgrath> is that done?  do we even need that link anymore?
20:10  * mmcgrath thinks dgilmore is pretty busy today with other meetings.
20:10 < mmcgrath> dgilmore: we'll go back to that
20:10 < dgilmore> mmcgrath: we have a wiki page that needs some legal lo

Re: Photo gallery

2008-08-07 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
My comments below are all regarding gallery2 (gallery2.menalto.com):

2008/8/7 Martin Sourada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thus I think it would be nice if it has these features:
>
>  - Categories/Subcategories

You could either do this by creating albums / subalbums or by using tags:

http://codex.gallery2.org/Gallery2:Modules:tags

>  - Ability to store big images (ca 1-6 MB), but provide user with low
> transfer rate when previewing - i.e. creating thumbnails at the server
> side

You can define up to 4 sizes that the original image will be resized
to.  For example, my site has 640x640, 1024x1024, 1280x1280 and
original size images available, plus the thumbnails shown in the album
view.  I've uploaded some very large TIFF files (20-30MB IIRC) and it
handled it just fine.

>  - Integration with FAS

>From what I can tell this would be possible, but may need some PHP coding.

>  - Some sort of rating system

http://codex.gallery2.org/Gallery2:Modules:rating

>  - Ability to download the full quality image easy (e.g. by one-click)

Gallery2 can do it in a couple clicks (view original size image, right
click on image and "save image as..."

>  - Probably ability to keep sources together with the resultant image in
> one place (in case it's e.g. a vector graphics or a collage)

That wouldn't be something that was "built in".

>  - Maybe some tag system to let users know what's in repos and what's
> not

http://codex.gallery2.org/Gallery2:Modules:tags

>  - Easy upload (can be either through CLI or Web Interface)

http://codex.gallery2.org/Gallery2:How_to_Add_Items

IIRC f-spot has the built-in ability to upload images to a gallery2
site as well.

>  - Would be nice if the full quality images/sources had some nice URLs
> so that we could easily fetch them either by build script or list them
> as sources in RPM.

http://codex.gallery2.org/Gallery2:Modules:rewrite

Jeff

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Photo gallery

2008-08-07 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Jeffrey Ollie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My comments below are all regarding gallery2 (gallery2.menalto.com):

Oops... that's gallery.menalto.com

Jeff

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


[serverbeach.com #1327168] IMPORTANT ServerBeach Message - Network Maintenance Notification *SERVICE IMPACTING* - Virginia - August 19th 2:00am-2:15am CDT (fwd)

2008-08-07 Thread Mike McGrath
FYI all:

THIS AN IMPORTANT MESSAGE CONCERNING YOUR SERVER -
PLEASE READ CAREFULLY

SERVER(S) AFFECTED:

ip 64.34.163.94
ip 64.34.163.95
ip 64.34.163.96

Please be advised that on Tuesday, August 19th between 2:00am
and 2:15am CDT we will be conducting maintenance on some of our
production leaf switches in Virginia.  This will cause a brief
network outage for your server(s) listed above for no more than
fifteen minutes.





___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Photo gallery

2008-08-07 Thread Ricky Zhou
On 2008-08-07 04:15:18 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> >  - Integration with FAS
> 
> >From what I can tell this would be possible, but may need some PHP coding.
Nigel may have already done most of the work for this - we'd probably
just need to hook it in :-)

Thanks,
Ricky


pgpTXJ2s2smUz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: [serverbeach.com #1327168] IMPORTANT ServerBeach Message - Network Maintenance Notification *SERVICE IMPACTING* - Virginia - August 19th 2:00am-2:15am CDT (fwd)

2008-08-07 Thread Ricky Zhou
On 2008-08-07 04:18:30 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> SERVER(S) AFFECTED:
> 
> ip 64.34.163.94
> ip 64.34.163.95
> ip 64.34.163.96
Specifically, will bring hte following hosts down:
serverbeach1
serverbeach2
serverbeach3
asterisk1
collab1
ns1
asterisk2
collab2

Thanks,
Ricky


pgp1VyC0BWxyS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Puppet and modules

2008-08-07 Thread Mike McGrath
So I've been working on modules for a bit now getting better educated on
them.  One thing that we haven't completely come to an agreement on is
what should be a module, and what should the module be called.  So until
we come up with a perfect test of it.  Here's what you should go by:


Is it a package you're trying to configure?  If yes.  it should be a
module.  And that module should have the exact same name as the module.

For now http is an exception to this because there's efficiencies to be
gained.  You don't have to go switch everything you're doing to modules
right away but when you're looking to configure something, like postfix,
for example.  hit up the modules/ directory first.  if its not in there.
Look elsewhere.

Having a good test question will be essential to keeping modules clean and
not end up in an environment like we (and I'm sure many) are in where
stuff is just stored all over the place.  This may change in the future
but until that point, stick with this.

-Mike

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Photo gallery

2008-08-07 Thread Martin Sourada
Thanks for the info. Looks like the gallery2 would satisfy our needs
pretty good. The only two issues I noticed is the missing integration
with FAS (which might be already in progress, as noted by Ricky), and
easy way to handle images sources (which is not a show-stopper for us,
though it would be nice if we could implement that nicely as well).

I guess we could set-up a test gallery2 implementation on one of our
fedorapeople accounts and if it works well, ask for transferring it to
art.fedoraproject.org here?

Thanks,
Martin


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Photo gallery

2008-08-07 Thread Toshio Kuratomi

Martin Sourada wrote:

Thanks for the info. Looks like the gallery2 would satisfy our needs
pretty good. The only two issues I noticed is the missing integration
with FAS (which might be already in progress, as noted by Ricky), and
easy way to handle images sources (which is not a show-stopper for us,
though it would be nice if we could implement that nicely as well).

I guess we could set-up a test gallery2 implementation on one of our
fedorapeople accounts and if it works well, ask for transferring it to
art.fedoraproject.org here?

We also need to decide if we want to run the software in Fedora 
Infrastructure.


Searching for CVEs was somewhat hard since gallery is a common name for 
photo gallery software.  I found 5 CVE's against Menalto Gallery this 
year and 9 last year.  There are other CVE's that weren't picked up in 
my search as they did not identify gallery as "menalto" (I googled and 
found references...)  I'm not sure how this compares to other gallery 
software but it is less than phpnuke, drupal, and other things that I 
have been against.


We do not yet have SELinux turned on on our app servers (although 
lmacken and dwalsh have gotten us much closer recently).  I am pretty 
sure we do have mod_security deployed.  Do we feel comfortable with 
this?  What are the alternatives that fit the criteria and are they worse?


-Toshio



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Photo gallery

2008-08-07 Thread Mike McGrath
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
> We do not yet have SELinux turned on on our app servers (although lmacken and
> dwalsh have gotten us much closer recently).  I am pretty sure we do have
> mod_security deployed.  Do we feel comfortable with this?  What are the
> alternatives that fit the criteria and are they worse?
>

mod_security deployed but needs testing and love.

-Mike

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Photo gallery

2008-08-07 Thread Nicu Buculei

Martin Sourada wrote:


The gallery would ideally serve both for the art team (as a place to
submit their pictures for evaluation by the whole team) and users (as an
additional place for additional easy-to-download wallpapers). Thus I
think it would be nice if it has these features:

 - Categories/Subcategories
 - Ability to store big images (ca 1-6 MB), but provide user with low
transfer rate when previewing - i.e. creating thumbnails at the server
side
 - Integration with FAS
 - Some sort of rating system
 - Ability to download the full quality image easy (e.g. by one-click)
 - Probably ability to keep sources together with the resultant image in
one place (in case it's e.g. a vector graphics or a collage)
 - Maybe some tag system to let users know what's in repos and what's 
not

 - Easy upload (can be either through CLI or Web Interface)
 - Would be nice if the full quality images/sources had some nice URLs
so that we could easily fetch them either by build script or list them
as sources in RPM.

Do you think we have other requirements, Nicu?


RSS feeds would be also nice to have and it seems there is a Gallery2 
module for that - http://codex.gallery2.org/Gallery2:Modules:rss (I have 
never tested it)


--
nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com
Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/
Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org
my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list