Re: change request: python-hashlib install on builders

2009-01-28 Thread Jesse Keating
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 13:51 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
>  Since the change on fedorapeople was a success, we need to make this
> change on the builders as well.

This change did cause some fallout.

The previous yum would not consider scriptlet (like %post) errors to be
fatal.  The new yum does.  This matters because bash apparently has had
a %post failure since December, both F11 and F10 builds it seems.  Once
the new yum was in place, no buildroot for F10 or F11 could init.  This
is quite bad.

Instead of rolling back yum, I'm attempting to replace bash's %post that
was in bash, and instead writing it in native lua.  This will allow bash
to complete its %post without any external deps.  If this works, I'll
create a F10 bash for dist-f10-override so that buildroots there will
init as well.

To get the build done, I've reverted yum on ppc10 and x86-2, and
disabled every other builder.  I'll re-enable things once we're able to
reliably create buildroots.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- FreedomĀ² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: change request: python-hashlib install on builders

2009-01-28 Thread seth vidal
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 14:07 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Jesse Keating wrote:
> > Since the change on fedorapeople was a success, we need to make this
> > change on the builders as well.
> > 
> > The problem is that when we create rawhide each night, we have random
> > builders create a chroot in order to run pungi in.  The chroot is
> > generated from the freshly made rawhide repos, which have the newer
> > sha256 sum in them.  We need a newer yum and the python-hashlib build in
> > order for the host yum to be able to process that metadata and generate
> > the chroot.
> > 
> So you need both yum and python-hashlib upgrades?
> 

yum needs to update to the version from rhel 5.3 - 3.2.19

python-hashlib doesn't need an update - it just needs to be installed.

-sv


___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: change request: python-hashlib install on builders

2009-01-28 Thread Jesse Keating
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 14:07 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Jesse Keating wrote:
> > Since the change on fedorapeople was a success, we need to make this
> > change on the builders as well.
> > 
> > The problem is that when we create rawhide each night, we have random
> > builders create a chroot in order to run pungi in.  The chroot is
> > generated from the freshly made rawhide repos, which have the newer
> > sha256 sum in them.  We need a newer yum and the python-hashlib build in
> > order for the host yum to be able to process that metadata and generate
> > the chroot.
> > 
> So you need both yum and python-hashlib upgrades?
> 

Yes.  sha256 support lives in python-hashlib, and the updated yum
handles such checksums, using the updated hashlib.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- FreedomĀ² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: change request: python-hashlib install on builders

2009-01-28 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
Jesse Keating wrote:
> Since the change on fedorapeople was a success, we need to make this
> change on the builders as well.
> 
> The problem is that when we create rawhide each night, we have random
> builders create a chroot in order to run pungi in.  The chroot is
> generated from the freshly made rawhide repos, which have the newer
> sha256 sum in them.  We need a newer yum and the python-hashlib build in
> order for the host yum to be able to process that metadata and generate
> the chroot.
> 
So you need both yum and python-hashlib upgrades?

-Toshio



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: change request: python-hashlib install on builders

2009-01-28 Thread seth vidal
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 15:59 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:
> 
> > Since the change on fedorapeople was a success, we need to make this
> > change on the builders as well.
> >
> > The problem is that when we create rawhide each night, we have random
> > builders create a chroot in order to run pungi in.  The chroot is
> > generated from the freshly made rawhide repos, which have the newer
> > sha256 sum in them.  We need a newer yum and the python-hashlib build in
> > order for the host yum to be able to process that metadata and generate
> > the chroot.
> >
> 
> +1 low risk, easy to revert.
> 
> Side question: Do we know what we're looking for if this breaks something?

the crowd of people screaming REGRESSION in rhel 5.3 bug reports?

More or less anything completely hurky happening in mock is what to look
out for.

-sv



___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: change request: python-hashlib install on builders

2009-01-28 Thread Mike McGrath
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:

> Since the change on fedorapeople was a success, we need to make this
> change on the builders as well.
>
> The problem is that when we create rawhide each night, we have random
> builders create a chroot in order to run pungi in.  The chroot is
> generated from the freshly made rawhide repos, which have the newer
> sha256 sum in them.  We need a newer yum and the python-hashlib build in
> order for the host yum to be able to process that metadata and generate
> the chroot.
>

+1 low risk, easy to revert.

Side question: Do we know what we're looking for if this breaks something?

-Mike

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: change request: python-hashlib install on fedorapeople.org and new yum

2009-01-28 Thread Mike McGrath
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:

> seth vidal wrote:
> > in order to stop the rss feed generator from kvetching I'd like to
> > install the new python-hashlib and new yum pkgs (from rhel 5.3) on
> > fedorapeople.
> >
> > Can I get a couple of +1's?
> >
> Seems like this will only affect fedorapeople and it can be reverted by
> downgrading the package if necessary.
>
> +1
>

 and technically fedorapeople isn't covered by the minor freeze so
this one could go through without +1's.

-Mike

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: change request: python-hashlib install on builders

2009-01-28 Thread Ricky Zhou
On 2009-01-28 01:51:46 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Since the change on fedorapeople was a success, we need to make this
> change on the builders as well.
> 
> The problem is that when we create rawhide each night, we have random
> builders create a chroot in order to run pungi in.  The chroot is
> generated from the freshly made rawhide repos, which have the newer
> sha256 sum in them.  We need a newer yum and the python-hashlib build in
> order for the host yum to be able to process that metadata and generate
> the chroot.
+1

Thanks,
Ricky


pgpsIyASeTkcx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


change request: python-hashlib install on builders

2009-01-28 Thread Jesse Keating
Since the change on fedorapeople was a success, we need to make this
change on the builders as well.

The problem is that when we create rawhide each night, we have random
builders create a chroot in order to run pungi in.  The chroot is
generated from the freshly made rawhide repos, which have the newer
sha256 sum in them.  We need a newer yum and the python-hashlib build in
order for the host yum to be able to process that metadata and generate
the chroot.
-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- FreedomĀ² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: change request: python-hashlib install on fedorapeople.org and new yum

2009-01-28 Thread Ofer Hasson
i agree

+1

2009/1/28 Toshio Kuratomi 

> seth vidal wrote:
> > in order to stop the rss feed generator from kvetching I'd like to
> > install the new python-hashlib and new yum pkgs (from rhel 5.3) on
> > fedorapeople.
> >
> > Can I get a couple of +1's?
> >
> Seems like this will only affect fedorapeople and it can be reverted by
> downgrading the package if necessary.
>
> +1
>
> -Toshio
>
>
> ___
> Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
> Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
>
>
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: change request: python-hashlib install on fedorapeople.org and new yum

2009-01-28 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
seth vidal wrote:
> in order to stop the rss feed generator from kvetching I'd like to
> install the new python-hashlib and new yum pkgs (from rhel 5.3) on
> fedorapeople.
> 
> Can I get a couple of +1's?
> 
Seems like this will only affect fedorapeople and it can be reverted by
downgrading the package if necessary.

+1

-Toshio



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: change request: python-hashlib install on fedorapeople.org and new yum

2009-01-28 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Wednesday 28 January 2009 02:42:35 pm seth vidal wrote:
> in order to stop the rss feed generator from kvetching I'd like to
> install the new python-hashlib and new yum pkgs (from rhel 5.3) on
> fedorapeople.
>
> Can I get a couple of +1's?
Amen,  

umm +1 :)

Dennis


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: change request: python-hashlib install on fedorapeople.org and new yum

2009-01-28 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 2:42 PM, seth vidal  wrote:
> in order to stop the rss feed generator from kvetching I'd like to
> install the new python-hashlib and new yum pkgs (from rhel 5.3) on
> fedorapeople.
>
> Can I get a couple of +1's?

+1

-- 
Jeff Ollie

"You know, I used to think it was awful that life was so unfair. Then
I thought, wouldn't it be much worse if life were fair, and all the
terrible things that happen to us come because we actually deserve
them? So, now I take great comfort in the general hostility and
unfairness of the universe."

-- Marcus to Franklin in Babylon 5: "A Late Delivery from Avalon"

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


change request: python-hashlib install on fedorapeople.org and new yum

2009-01-28 Thread seth vidal
in order to stop the rss feed generator from kvetching I'd like to
install the new python-hashlib and new yum pkgs (from rhel 5.3) on
fedorapeople.

Can I get a couple of +1's?

thanks,
-sv


___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list