Re: package category new-package for fedora-package-announce
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 03:20:43PM -0400, David Juran wrote: Hello! Would it be possible to add a new category for new packages to the fedora-package-announce list? I'm interested in seeing what new packages are released to Fedora but I don't have the time/patience to wade through the full bulk of the fedora-package-announce list. So in the same way that there currently exists a category for security updates, would it be possible to implement a category for new packages? Hi David, Would prepending something like [NEW] to the subject (similar to how we add [SECURITY]) suffice? This would be a fairly trivial change to bodhi. luke ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: package category new-package for fedora-package-announce
On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 10:01 -0400, Luke Macken wrote: Would prepending something like [NEW] to the subject (similar to how we add [SECURITY]) suffice? This would be a fairly trivial change to bodhi. Sure, that would make it easy enough to filter (-: -- David Juran Sr. Consultant Red Hat +358-504-146348 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: package category new-package for fedora-package-announce
Luke Macken wrote: Would prepending something like [NEW] to the subject (similar to how we add [SECURITY]) suffice? This would be a fairly trivial change to bodhi. If that's done, making a 'New' topic in the mailman list should be trivial as well. Then folks could subscribe and choose to only receive that topic. I'm not a list admin for the package announce list, so I don't want to volunteer anyone for more work, but I would be happy to help as a list admin there though, if it would help. -- ToddOpenPGP - KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~ Damn you vile woman, you've impeded my work since the day I escaped your vile womb! -- Stewie Griffin pgpPl7RdWoz1S.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: package category new-package for fedora-package-announce
On Jul 6, 2009, at 7:09, David Juran dju...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 10:01 -0400, Luke Macken wrote: Would prepending something like [NEW] to the subject (similar to how we add [SECURITY]) suffice? This would be a fairly trivial change to bodhi. Sure, that would make it easy enough to filter (-: I would prefer x-update_type or similar. Allow for filtering without dirtying up the subject. I would also make it easier to make topics on the mailman side. -- Jes ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Some ongoing issues
So we've got some ongoing issues in our environment right now. Some of them are unrelated. All are being worked on but one in particular I want to discuss on the list here because I just don't know what changed. The problem: When one of the fas servers goes offline, most of our other apps get taken offline. The way it is supposed to work: When one of our fas servers goes offline, haproxy takes it out of the farm and sends all requests to the still online fas server. Thus, possibly, generating a few errors for a short time but generally goes un-noticed. The details: When one of the fas servers goes offline, haproxy is hanging on that connection. The application servers hang or possibly try to re-use connections to fas, thus causing the number of httpd processes to sky rocket on the app servers. Ultimately hitting MaxClients and taking everything offline. This happens fairly quickly, matter of seconds. It seems that even after haproxy flags the fas server as dead (takes about 15s), that any connections open at that time to the old server aren't killed. They just hang. Outstanding questions: What changed? Does python-fedora (our primary interface to fas) now do something differently with keepalive? Anyone else using haproxy seeing this same issue? I've got redispatch enabled still. -Mike ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
[Request for Resources] Global ambassadors map.
Hi, Here is the details for the RFR of global ambassadors map project. I have also updated the ticket #1514. Thanks. - Project Sponsor - Name: Susmit Shannigrahi Fedora Account Name: susmit Group: Ambassadors Infrastructure Sponsor: None so far. - Secondary Contact info - Name: Joerg Simon Fedora Account Name: jsimon Group: Ambassadors - Project Info: - Project Name: Global Ambassadors map. Target Audience: Anyone needing any info about fp.o. Inside and outside fp.o. Expiration/Delivery Date (required): As soon as possible. :) Description/Summary: Mapping app extracting location info of Ambassadors and put it on a map, along with necessary contact information. Project plan (Detailed): Ambassadors are interface between the project and the people. So, whenever wants to know something about fedora, he/she cantacts an ambassador. So far, this has been a tedious process of searching through a number of user pages to know who is the nearest ambassador to contact. This map will enable anyone to locate the location of an ambassador and/or the nearest one whom to ask help for. This can be extended for all other sub projects too. Goals: , nothing to add. - Specific resources needed: - 1. Hosting of https://fedorahosted.org/fama/browser/ambassadors_map/ambassadors.html 2. Hosting of https://fedorahosted.org/fama/browser/ambassadors_map/ambassadors_location.txt (contains data for the map) 3. Hosting and putting into cron this python script https://fedorahosted.org/fama/browser/membership-map.py. Also, automated authentication using dummy fas account to get location data from fas. 4.Preferably Puppet managed. - Additional Info (Optional) : - A test instance is here: http://publictest15.fedoraproject.org/amb_map/ambassadors.html Thanks. -- Regards, Susmit. = ssh 0x86DD170A http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/user:susmit = ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Self introduction
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello f-i-l! If you're on the websites team, you may know me already, and if you're in #fedora-admin frequently on freenode you might also know me. So, I'm 14 years old (might be scary for some of you to find out), and I'm mostly working with the Fedora infrastructure to work on a new project for Fedora, blogs.fedoraproject.org. In my defense for working on blogs, is I run my own blog on my own server (right out of the WordPress svn tree!), and it's fairly successful. If you wanna check it out, visit http://oks.kicks-ass.net/~onekopaka/blog/ . So yep. That's pretty much my intro email... Darren VanBuren onekop...@gmail.com http://oks.verymad.net/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin) iD8DBQFKUrWdBkMMSWb0YpYRAinUAKC7jhApP69Z03TQw+JJHDFX+KwylACfc9Hz Ms3tlYEfdI9+xaWZKd/iLfY= =+44U -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
RE: Self introduction
Wasn't Ricky about 14 when he started with us? :-) Welcome Darren. -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com www.dell.com/linux -Original Message- From: fedora-infrastructure-list-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:fedora-infrastructure-list-boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Jon Stanley Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 9:55 PM To: Fedora Infrastructure Subject: Re: Self introduction On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Darren VanBurenonekop...@gmail.com wrote: So yep. That's pretty much my intro email... Welcome Darren! I just sponsored Darren into sysadmin-web, let me know if he breaks anything! Just kidding, I'm sure that won't happen :) ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
