Re: Blogs site?
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Mike McGrath wrote: Whats the status of the blogs site? Is it ready to go? People want to use it :) Where are the directions? Hello Mike, I've just signed up. It seems that with trial to log in with my FAS credentials, I got a big fat: Not Found The requested URL /wp/http://blogs.fedoraproject.org/wp/wp-signup.php was not found on this server. I had to apply the url manually http://blogs.fedoraproject.org/wp/wp-signup.php in order to create a blog. Cheers, Chitlesh ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Blogs site?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This seems to be a WordPress issue, with the whole SSL deal. It's pretty much go, but we need to clarify that users should manually login before clicking the signup link in order to circumvent this little issue. Darren VanBuren onekop...@gmail.com http://theoks.net/ On Sep 29, 2009, at 11:52 PM, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote: On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Mike McGrath wrote: Whats the status of the blogs site? Is it ready to go? People want to use it :) Where are the directions? Hello Mike, I've just signed up. It seems that with trial to log in with my FAS credentials, I got a big fat: Not Found The requested URL /wp/http://blogs.fedoraproject.org/wp/wp-signup.php was not found on this server. I had to apply the url manually http://blogs.fedoraproject.org/wp/wp-signup.php in order to create a blog. Cheers, Chitlesh ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkrDAvoACgkQBkMMSWb0YpbaZACgpOHQIO8g+e4chdBwQXse62gQ d8gAn26oYqsrG/AaX48iCuNRtg/nLEQg =hocb -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Change Freeze
Just a reminder to everyone. We are officially frozen under a prerelease freeze - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/SOP/Release#Change_Freeze You can check the list at - sudo yum -y install openoffice.org-draw git clone git://git.fedorahosted.org/git/fedora-infrastructure.git/ cd fedora-infrastructure/architecture oodraw Environments.odg -Mike ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Looking for people who need guests.
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009, Mike McGrath wrote: I'm looking to put some load on our new cloud environment. This is a pre-pre-pre type setup. The guests will go up, they'll go down. You know the deal. You'll only have this guest for a month or so but if you think you could use a guest, let me know. Because right now the guests aren't actually doing work. Ok, people who requested these should have them by now. If you haven't gotten an email from me email me and let me know. -Mike ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Blogs site?
On 09/30/2009 09:48 AM, Mike McGrath wrote: On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Darren VanBuren wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This seems to be a WordPress issue, with the whole SSL deal. It's pretty much go, but we need to clarify that users should manually login before clicking the signup link in order to circumvent this little issue. Well lets find some victim^H^H^H^H^H^Hvolunteer and get at least one blog in there and document the process all the way through. Anyone want to step forward? So, here's what I'm seeing: 1) logging-in appears to work fine, though I get a spurious FAS login failed before I've even tried a uname/passwd auth. Are we trying some sort of client-side cert validation first, and that's failing? 2) When trying to create a blog from the logged-out state, I get sent to the login page, w/ a parameter that's supposed to take me to the signup page upon succesful authentication: https://blogs.fedoraproject.org/wp/wp-login.php?redirect_to=http%253A%252F%252Fblogs.fedoraproject.org%252Fwp%252Fwp-signup.php Something very odd is happening, though. The 302 response code looks sane: POST /wp/wp-login.php HTTP/1.1 [snip] HTTP/1.x 302 Found Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:17:26 GMT Server: Apache/2.2.3 (Red Hat) X-Powered-By: PHP/5.1.6 Expires: Wed, 11 Jan 1984 05:00:00 GMT Last-Modified: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:17:26 GMT Cache-Control: no-cache, must-revalidate, max-age=0 Pragma: no-cache Location: http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.fedoraproject.org%2Fwp%2Fwp-signup.php ... but firefox then proceeds to generate this request: GET /wp/http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.fedoraproject.org%2Fwp%2Fwp-signup.php HTTP/1.1 ... which yields (validly) a 404 error. No idea why firefox is trying to follow that path; redacted Live HTTP Headers log attached. Anyone testing this w/ a browser other than F11's firefox? Same issue shows up on iPhone's Safari browser... --Bret https://blogs.fedoraproject.org/wp/wp-login.php POST /wp/wp-login.php HTTP/1.1 Host: blogs.fedoraproject.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.3) Gecko/20090909 Fedora/3.5.3-1.fc11 Firefox/3.5.3 Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8 Accept-Language: en-us,en;q=0.5 Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7 Keep-Alive: 300 Connection: keep-alive Referer: https://blogs.fedoraproject.org/wp/wp-login.php?redirect_to=http%253A%252F%252Fblogs.fedoraproject.org%252Fwp%252Fwp-signup.php Cookie: wordpress_test_cookie=WP+Cookie+check; wp-settings-time-38=1254327347 Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Content-Length: 134 log=bretmpwd=1977thomaswp-submit=Log+Inredirect_to=http%253A%252F%252Fblogs.fedoraproject.org%252Fwp%252Fwp-signup.phptestcookie=1 HTTP/1.x 302 Found Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:17:26 GMT Server: Apache/2.2.3 (Red Hat) X-Powered-By: PHP/5.1.6 Expires: Wed, 11 Jan 1984 05:00:00 GMT Last-Modified: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:17:26 GMT Cache-Control: no-cache, must-revalidate, max-age=0 Pragma: no-cache Location: http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.fedoraproject.org%2Fwp%2Fwp-signup.php AppTime: D=571224 AppServer: value2.fedora.phx.redhat.com Content-Length: 0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Set-Cookie: wordpress_test_cookie=WP+Cookie+check; path=/wp/; domain=.blogs.fedoraproject.org Set-Cookie: wordpress_=bretm%7C1254500246%7Cc09e0cc70f32c7c55d758ae4af4d14de; path=/wp/wp-content/plugins; domain=.blogs.fedoraproject.org; HttpOnly Set-Cookie: wordpress_=bretm%7C1254500246%7Cc09e0cc70f32c7c55d758ae4af4d14de; path=/wp/; domain=.blogs.fedoraproject.org; HttpOnly Set-Cookie: wordpress_logged_in_=bretm%7C1254500246%7C051116532fb45f3bf9f68d7861e69e4f; path=/wp/; domain=.blogs.fedoraproject.org; HttpOnly ProxyTime: D=582964 ProxyServer: proxy2.fedora.phx.redhat.com Keep-Alive: timeout=15, max=500 Connection: Keep-Alive -- https://blogs.fedoraproject.org/wp/http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.fedoraproject.org%2Fwp%2Fwp-signup.php GET /wp/http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.fedoraproject.org%2Fwp%2Fwp-signup.php HTTP/1.1 Host: blogs.fedoraproject.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.3) Gecko/20090909 Fedora/3.5.3-1.fc11 Firefox/3.5.3 Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8 Accept-Language: en-us,en;q=0.5 Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7 Keep-Alive: 300 Connection: keep-alive Referer: https://blogs.fedoraproject.org/wp/wp-login.php?redirect_to=http%253A%252F%252Fblogs.fedoraproject.org%252Fwp%252Fwp-signup.php Cookie: wordpress_test_cookie=WP+Cookie+check; wp-settings-time-38=1254327347; wordpress_=bretm%7C1254500246%7Cc09e0cc70f32c7c55d758ae4af4d14de; wordpress_logged_in_=bretm%7C1254500246%7C051116532fb45f3bf9f68d7861e69e4f HTTP/1.x 404 Not Found Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:17:26 GMT Server: Apache/2.2.3 (Red Hat) Content-Length: 338 Keep-Alive: timeout=15, max=499 Connection: Keep-Alive Content-Type: text/html;
Re: Blogs site?
Hi, Everything has worked fine for me here ! First, I logged into FAS and, after it, I tryed to create a blog using this link http://blogs.fedoraproject.org/wp/wp-signup.php . My blog is working and I already did a post... Thanks, -- Davi Vercillo C. Garcia B.Sc. Student - DCC-IM/UFRJ Fedora Project Contributor http://davivercillo.fedorapeople.org/ If a million people say a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing. - Anatole France ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Blogs site?
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Davi Vercillo C. Garcia wrote: Hi, Everything has worked fine for me here ! First, I logged into FAS and, after it, I tryed to create a blog using this link http://blogs.fedoraproject.org/wp/wp-signup.php . My blog is working and I already did a post... Anyone know of a way to get a list of blogs on the site? I don't see it there. -Mike ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Blogs site?
No Mike, there's not such a page yet. Darren VanBuren - Sent from my iPod Take control of your desktop with Fedora 11. Reign. http://fedoraproject.org/ On Sep 30, 2009, at 9:56, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Davi Vercillo C. Garcia wrote: Hi, Everything has worked fine for me here ! First, I logged into FAS and, after it, I tryed to create a blog using this link http://blogs.fedoraproject.org/wp/wp-signup.php . My blog is working and I already did a post... Anyone know of a way to get a list of blogs on the site? I don't see it there. -Mike ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: FAD -- startin' early
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote: Jeff C. Ollie wrote: Probably want to look at getting Asterisk 1.6.2 packaged. It's still in release candidate, but 1.6.2 has new conferencing software that isn't hacked in by a 3rd party or requires a kernel module. Since F13 early branching is happening soon we can develop the package there and then backport it to RHEL or whatever we end up running the service on. Cool idea, Jeff. OK, Asterisk 1.6.2.0-rc2 is now in devel. Since rawhide is still composing from dist-f12 you'll need to grab it from Koji or rebuild it on your own: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=134541 Note that I haven't actually tried the package yet, after lunch I'm going to rebuild it locally for F11 and see how that works. FYI, I plan on keeping the official F12 and F11 Asterisk packages on 1.6.1.X. F13 will be the first release with 1.6.2.X. -- Jeff Ollie ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
FAD Fedora Talk tech items
Two tech items I wanted to clear up for Fedora Talk FAD: First, qe discussed earlier using softphones for consistency and less equipment-lugging. Didn't hear any votes against so that's all we're planning at this point. It also makes sense to concentrate on that use because the majority of people using Fedora Talk are likely using softphones. Second, network setup at the site. I talked to the owner of the office we'll be using and he says they have a wide-open wireless, *and* a wired connection we can feel free to use which is the same thing their wireless plugs into. I'm going to scoot over there on Friday if I can, and test how things work with a softphone. I didn't get any hints from anyone on what special tests I needed to do beyond trying to hook up to Fedora Talk and make and receive a call, so that's all I plan to do unless someone tells me otherwise. -- Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: FAD Fedora Talk tech items
Generally from my experience the primary things that effect VoIP would be Packet loss, and Latency. There are tons of other things such as RF noise etc.. however those shouldnt* be an issue. Packet loss is going to be pretty obvious across the wire due to the way it is normally handled (fill in dropped packet with previous packets data). With that said depending on the wireless (signal strength / noise) there could be potential issues (packet loss, distortion, static, delay in sound), however if there are this can be easily mitigated by the use of the hard line. Just my 2 cents. - Tim On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 14:11 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: Two tech items I wanted to clear up for Fedora Talk FAD: First, qe discussed earlier using softphones for consistency and less equipment-lugging. Didn't hear any votes against so that's all we're planning at this point. It also makes sense to concentrate on that use because the majority of people using Fedora Talk are likely using softphones. Second, network setup at the site. I talked to the owner of the office we'll be using and he says they have a wide-open wireless, *and* a wired connection we can feel free to use which is the same thing their wireless plugs into. I'm going to scoot over there on Friday if I can, and test how things work with a softphone. I didn't get any hints from anyone on what special tests I needed to do beyond trying to hook up to Fedora Talk and make and receive a call, so that's all I plan to do unless someone tells me otherwise. ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: FAD Fedora Talk tech items
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 01:20:02PM -0500, t...@codero.com wrote: Generally from my experience the primary things that effect VoIP would be Packet loss, and Latency. There are tons of other things such as RF noise etc.. however those shouldnt* be an issue. Packet loss is going to be pretty obvious across the wire due to the way it is normally handled (fill in dropped packet with previous packets data). With that said depending on the wireless (signal strength / noise) there could be potential issues (packet loss, distortion, static, delay in sound), however if there are this can be easily mitigated by the use of the hard line. Just my 2 cents. - Tim This is good information to know, thanks Tim. Fortunately most of what we're doing isn't going to be dependent on the quality of the connection, but rather building additional functionality into the services themselves. Your well-stated concerns above will continue to apply across the board when using Fedora Talk or other VoIP systems. -- Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Blogs site?
I tried signing up for a blog... and I had an issue even with my FAS (leemwilliams) it said I didn't meet min requirements. I assumed it was because I'm not a member of any fedora project as yet - and this was confirmed in irc thanks to those concerned. So other than requiring a FAS and that FAS be assigned to a fedora project marked as non-cla (where can I get a list of these or is it just the items on the wiki project page?) are there any other requirements? I want to clarify what those min requirements are and write them down some place with a view to getting a link on the blog sign in page and/or a failed sign in / create blog request. Cheers. Lee. On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 13:52 -0300, Davi Vercillo C. Garcia wrote: Hi, Everything has worked fine for me here ! First, I logged into FAS and, after it, I tryed to create a blog using this link http://blogs.fedoraproject.org/wp/wp-signup.php . My blog is working and I already did a post... Thanks, ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Blogs site?
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Lee Williams wrote: I tried signing up for a blog... and I had an issue even with my FAS (leemwilliams) it said I didn't meet min requirements. I assumed it was because I'm not a member of any fedora project as yet - and this was confirmed in irc thanks to those concerned. Yeah this project's stuck at 90% done. So other than requiring a FAS and that FAS be assigned to a fedora project marked as non-cla (where can I get a list of these or is it just the items on the wiki project page?) are there any other requirements? Were these the requirements we came up with? There's two options here: 1) Require only CLA 2) Require CLA + one group. We generally like 2) because that's also our definition of an actual Fedora 'contributor' (it's also the list of users on fedorapeople) I want to clarify what those min requirements are and write them down some place with a view to getting a link on the blog sign in page and/or a failed sign in / create blog request. What do others think the requirements should be? We need to get it documented, linked to from the blogs site, etc. -Mike Cheers. Lee. On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 13:52 -0300, Davi Vercillo C. Garcia wrote: Hi, Everything has worked fine for me here ! First, I logged into FAS and, after it, I tryed to create a blog using this link http://blogs.fedoraproject.org/wp/wp-signup.php . My blog is working and I already did a post... Thanks, ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: FAD Fedora Talk tech items
Paul, Cheers to that, I miss read the site portion as if it were asking about any potential concerns there. If you need any help in developing/implementation of the additional services please feel free to let me know. I am not always around in IRC but would be more than willing to give a hand as needed, just shoot a project / idea in my direction. Just a side note I will be out of service for a few days from the 5th to the 7th. Heading down to cPanel Con. On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 15:09 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 01:20:02PM -0500, t...@codero.com wrote: Generally from my experience the primary things that effect VoIP would be Packet loss, and Latency. There are tons of other things such as RF noise etc.. however those shouldnt* be an issue. Packet loss is going to be pretty obvious across the wire due to the way it is normally handled (fill in dropped packet with previous packets data). With that said depending on the wireless (signal strength / noise) there could be potential issues (packet loss, distortion, static, delay in sound), however if there are this can be easily mitigated by the use of the hard line. Just my 2 cents. - Tim This is good information to know, thanks Tim. Fortunately most of what we're doing isn't going to be dependent on the quality of the connection, but rather building additional functionality into the services themselves. Your well-stated concerns above will continue to apply across the board when using Fedora Talk or other VoIP systems. ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Blogs site?
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 02:34:01PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: Were these the requirements we came up with? There's two options here: 1) Require only CLA 2) Require CLA + one group. We generally like 2) because that's also our definition of an actual Fedora 'contributor' (it's also the list of users on fedorapeople) CLA + 1 group would be recommendation too. Same requirements as getting your blog posted on planet.fp.o (due to the fedorapeople requirement). FWIW, you have to be an Ubuntu member to get your blog aggregated on their planet. I didn't push too hard, but back when I was doing a bunch of packaging work with them, I didn't qualify for membership status. I like that Fedora has a lower threshhold to qualify, but keep it at CLA+1 to avoid pure spammers. -Matt -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com www.dell.com/linux ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Blogs site?
This seems to be a WordPress issue, with the whole SSL deal. It's pretty much go, but we need to clarify that users should manually login before clicking the signup link in order to circumvent this little issue. Well lets find some victim^H^H^H^H^H^Hvolunteer and get at least one blog in there and document the process all the way through. Anyone want to step forward? FWIW, my first post was a list of bugs I'd found while testing the sign-up process: https://blogs.fedoraproject.org/wp/mchua/2009/08/18/hello-world/. I didn't think of documenting the sign-up process itself in my first post, but that'd make a good first post for someone else to do. I don't recall sign-up taking a terribly long time (certainly way less than 20 minutes). --Mel ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
FAD F-Talk non-tech stuff
Jeff reminded me of a couple topics that would be handy to note, so I just wrote them up on the wiki page for information: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FAD_Fedora_Talk_2009#Logistics -- Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Blogs site?
Hello, I created a test blog and one thing I noticed was that a direct link to the dash board was missing on the main page once a FAS authenticated user has logged in. I have been using wordpress as my blog software for over 2.5 years... The dashboard link would be quite essential for bloggers... Just something I noticed. Thanks and Regards Jose M Manimala -- From: Mel Chua m...@redhat.com Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 1:41 AM To: Fedora Infrastructure fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: Blogs site? This seems to be a WordPress issue, with the whole SSL deal. It's pretty much go, but we need to clarify that users should manually login before clicking the signup link in order to circumvent this little issue. Well lets find some victim^H^H^H^H^H^Hvolunteer and get at least one blog in there and document the process all the way through. Anyone want to step forward? FWIW, my first post was a list of bugs I'd found while testing the sign-up process: https://blogs.fedoraproject.org/wp/mchua/2009/08/18/hello-world/. I didn't think of documenting the sign-up process itself in my first post, but that'd make a good first post for someone else to do. I don't recall sign-up taking a terribly long time (certainly way less than 20 minutes). --Mel ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Blogs site?
Yep, Mel mentioned this in said post of bugs. I may be able to fix this easily Darren VanBuren - Sent from my iPod Take control of your desktop with Fedora 11. Reign. http://fedoraproject.org/ On Sep 30, 2009, at 13:31, Jose Mathew Manimala josemanim...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I created a test blog and one thing I noticed was that a direct link to the dash board was missing on the main page once a FAS authenticated user has logged in. I have been using wordpress as my blog software for over 2.5 years... The dashboard link would be quite essential for bloggers... Just something I noticed. Thanks and Regards Jose M Manimala -- From: Mel Chua m...@redhat.com Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 1:41 AM To: Fedora Infrastructure fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: Blogs site? This seems to be a WordPress issue, with the whole SSL deal. It's pretty much go, but we need to clarify that users should manually login before clicking the signup link in order to circumvent this little issue. Well lets find some victim^H^H^H^H^H^Hvolunteer and get at least one blog in there and document the process all the way through. Anyone want to step forward? FWIW, my first post was a list of bugs I'd found while testing the sign-up process: https://blogs.fedoraproject.org/wp/mchua/2009/08/18/hello-world/ . I didn't think of documenting the sign-up process itself in my first post, but that'd make a good first post for someone else to do. I don't recall sign-up taking a terribly long time (certainly way less than 20 minutes). --Mel ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: FAD -- startin' early
Jeffrey Ollie said the following on 09/30/2009 10:43 AM Pacific Time: On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote: Jeff C. Ollie wrote: Probably want to look at getting Asterisk 1.6.2 packaged. It's still in release candidate, but 1.6.2 has new conferencing software that isn't hacked in by a 3rd party or requires a kernel module. Since F13 early branching is happening soon we can develop the package there and then backport it to RHEL or whatever we end up running the service on. Cool idea, Jeff. OK, Asterisk 1.6.2.0-rc2 is now in devel. Since rawhide is still composing from dist-f12 you'll need to grab it from Koji or rebuild it on your own: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=134541 Note that I haven't actually tried the package yet, after lunch I'm going to rebuild it locally for F11 and see how that works. FYI, I plan on keeping the official F12 and F11 Asterisk packages on 1.6.1.X. F13 will be the first release with 1.6.2.X. Which version do we plan to use for our development work at the FAD? John ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: FAD -- startin' early
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 03:51:23PM -0700, John Poelstra wrote: Jeffrey Ollie said the following on 09/30/2009 10:43 AM Pacific Time: On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote: Jeff C. Ollie wrote: Probably want to look at getting Asterisk 1.6.2 packaged. It's still in release candidate, but 1.6.2 has new conferencing software that isn't hacked in by a 3rd party or requires a kernel module. Since F13 early branching is happening soon we can develop the package there and then backport it to RHEL or whatever we end up running the service on. Cool idea, Jeff. OK, Asterisk 1.6.2.0-rc2 is now in devel. Since rawhide is still composing from dist-f12 you'll need to grab it from Koji or rebuild it on your own: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=134541 Note that I haven't actually tried the package yet, after lunch I'm going to rebuild it locally for F11 and see how that works. FYI, I plan on keeping the official F12 and F11 Asterisk packages on 1.6.1.X. F13 will be the first release with 1.6.2.X. Which version do we plan to use for our development work at the FAD? AFAIK, we should use the version that will be rolled out on Fedora Infrastructure, and that seems to be 1.6.1.x. I think Infrastructure generally requires we stick with what's actively maintained and considered stable, as opposed to a preview. -- Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: FAD -- startin' early
Paul W. Frields said the following on 09/25/2009 10:13 AM Pacific Time: I constructed a page on the wiki for an upcoming FAD where some contributors are going to work on some long-standing Fedora Talk related tickets. Details are here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FAD_Fedora_Talk_2009 There's a list of related tickets on the page, namely #s 309, 395, 453, and 1160, that we're going to try to knock out that weekend. To a large extent they're duplicates, but they all revolve around extending the Fedora Talk capabilities. We're going to be conversing on this list since obviously the work's primarily, maybe even wholly, infrastructure-related. Below is a bit of introductory email from last night that I wanted to make sure was captured transparently here. As Paul mentioned in another post, I started this page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FAD_Fedora_Talk_2009_game_plan#Participants to contain the actual people and work items for the event when it happens. We'll use this page to track who is doing what and when they will be available. Please add or update your information and be sure to link your name to your wiki User: page so we can reach you if need be during the event. I'd also like to have an IRC meeting next week to kick things off and get the ideas flowing. We'll use the #fedora-fad channel for this meeting on freenode. Please indicate your availability here: http://whenisgood.net/45kn5m by the end of the week! Thanks, John ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: FAD -- startin' early
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 03:51:23PM -0700, John Poelstra wrote: Jeffrey Ollie said the following on 09/30/2009 10:43 AM Pacific Time: FYI, I plan on keeping the official F12 and F11 Asterisk packages on 1.6.1.X. F13 will be the first release with 1.6.2.X. Which version do we plan to use for our development work at the FAD? AFAIK, we should use the version that will be rolled out on Fedora Infrastructure, and that seems to be 1.6.1.x. I think Infrastructure generally requires we stick with what's actively maintained and considered stable, as opposed to a preview. The problem with using versions before 1.6.2.X is that to get conferencing you either need to hack in a 3rd party patch (which was too difficult to maintain so I took it out of the Fedora package) or use a kernel module that isn't upstream. Yeah, that means we're kind of stuck with a prerelease version but I'm not sure what else to do. -- Jeff Ollie ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: FAD -- startin' early
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 04:41:56PM -0700, John Poelstra wrote: Paul W. Frields said the following on 09/25/2009 10:13 AM Pacific Time: I constructed a page on the wiki for an upcoming FAD where some contributors are going to work on some long-standing Fedora Talk related tickets. Details are here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FAD_Fedora_Talk_2009 There's a list of related tickets on the page, namely #s 309, 395, 453, and 1160, that we're going to try to knock out that weekend. To a large extent they're duplicates, but they all revolve around extending the Fedora Talk capabilities. We're going to be conversing on this list since obviously the work's primarily, maybe even wholly, infrastructure-related. Below is a bit of introductory email from last night that I wanted to make sure was captured transparently here. As Paul mentioned in another post, I started this page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FAD_Fedora_Talk_2009_game_plan#Participants to contain the actual people and work items for the event when it happens. We'll use this page to track who is doing what and when they will be available. Please add or update your information and be sure to link your name to your wiki User: page so we can reach you if need be during the event. I'd also like to have an IRC meeting next week to kick things off and get the ideas flowing. We'll use the #fedora-fad channel for this meeting on freenode. Please indicate your availability here: http://whenisgood.net/45kn5m by the end of the week! Done. Starting Wednesday lunch I'll be on travel and meetings will be difficult -- sorry about being less flexible than usual. -- Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: FAD -- startin' early
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 03:51:23PM -0700, John Poelstra wrote: Jeffrey Ollie said the following on 09/30/2009 10:43 AM Pacific Time: FYI, I plan on keeping the official F12 and F11 Asterisk packages on 1.6.1.X. F13 will be the first release with 1.6.2.X. Which version do we plan to use for our development work at the FAD? AFAIK, we should use the version that will be rolled out on Fedora Infrastructure, and that seems to be 1.6.1.x. I think Infrastructure generally requires we stick with what's actively maintained and considered stable, as opposed to a preview. The problem with using versions before 1.6.2.X is that to get conferencing you either need to hack in a 3rd party patch (which was too difficult to maintain so I took it out of the Fedora package) or use a kernel module that isn't upstream. Yeah, that means we're kind of stuck with a prerelease version but I'm not sure what else to do. Correct me if I'm wrong, I thought we had that version ready for rawhide (back when F11 was rawhide)? What happened with all that? -Mike___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: FAD -- startin' early
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: The problem with using versions before 1.6.2.X is that to get conferencing you either need to hack in a 3rd party patch (which was too difficult to maintain so I took it out of the Fedora package) or use a kernel module that isn't upstream. Yeah, that means we're kind of stuck with a prerelease version but I'm not sure what else to do. Correct me if I'm wrong, I thought we had that version ready for rawhide (back when F11 was rawhide)? What happened with all that? IIRC that was a 1.6.1.0 release candidate with a bunch of patches backported from trunk. Time passed and what was trunk then is now a 1.6.2.0 release candidate, so we can at least work from a minimally patched tarball. The patches are mostly just getting Asterisk to build in the Fedora way, without adding any functionality. I'm also going to see what it takes to build on RHEL, but I may have to disable some functionality that depends on libraries that aren't new enough in RHEL. -- Jeff Ollie ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: FAD -- startin' early
Jeffrey Ollie said the following on 09/30/2009 07:12 PM Pacific Time: On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: The problem with using versions before 1.6.2.X is that to get conferencing you either need to hack in a 3rd party patch (which was too difficult to maintain so I took it out of the Fedora package) or use a kernel module that isn't upstream. Yeah, that means we're kind of stuck with a prerelease version but I'm not sure what else to do. Correct me if I'm wrong, I thought we had that version ready for rawhide (back when F11 was rawhide)? What happened with all that? IIRC that was a 1.6.1.0 release candidate with a bunch of patches backported from trunk. Time passed and what was trunk then is now a 1.6.2.0 release candidate, so we can at least work from a minimally patched tarball. The patches are mostly just getting Asterisk to build in the Fedora way, without adding any functionality. I'm also going to see what it takes to build on RHEL, but I may have to disable some functionality that depends on libraries that aren't new enough in RHEL. Thanks for looking into all of this now! I think it is awesome that we are figuring this stuff out now instead of at the FAD :-) John ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Blogs site?
We could have the signup and requirements on the main blog amongst other FAQ as well. Darren was telling he was making a screencast. But i have no idea what happened to it. Darren you gonna do it? Regards, Hiemanshu Sharma. 2009/10/1 Darren VanBuren onekop...@gmail.com: Yep, Mel mentioned this in said post of bugs. I may be able to fix this easily Darren VanBuren - Sent from my iPod Take control of your desktop with Fedora 11. Reign. http://fedoraproject.org/ On Sep 30, 2009, at 13:31, Jose Mathew Manimala josemanim...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I created a test blog and one thing I noticed was that a direct link to the dash board was missing on the main page once a FAS authenticated user has logged in. I have been using wordpress as my blog software for over 2.5 years... The dashboard link would be quite essential for bloggers... Just something I noticed. Thanks and Regards Jose M Manimala -- From: Mel Chua m...@redhat.com Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 1:41 AM To: Fedora Infrastructure fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: Blogs site? This seems to be a WordPress issue, with the whole SSL deal. It's pretty much go, but we need to clarify that users should manually login before clicking the signup link in order to circumvent this little issue. Well lets find some victim^H^H^H^H^H^Hvolunteer and get at least one blog in there and document the process all the way through. Anyone want to step forward? FWIW, my first post was a list of bugs I'd found while testing the sign-up process: https://blogs.fedoraproject.org/wp/mchua/2009/08/18/hello-world/. I didn't think of documenting the sign-up process itself in my first post, but that'd make a good first post for someone else to do. I don't recall sign-up taking a terribly long time (certainly way less than 20 minutes). --Mel ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list -- Regards, Hiemanshu Sharma. ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Blogs site?
Darren, Then just document the signup process and add it as a blog post to the main site. 2009/10/1 Darren VanBuren onekop...@gmail.com: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I sucked at making the screencast ;-) I mean really sucked. I might try again in the near future. Darren VanBuren onekop...@gmail.com http://theoks.net/ On Sep 30, 2009, at 8:03 PM, Hiemanshu Sharma wrote: We could have the signup and requirements on the main blog amongst other FAQ as well. Darren was telling he was making a screencast. But i have no idea what happened to it. Darren you gonna do it? Regards, Hiemanshu Sharma. 2009/10/1 Darren VanBuren onekop...@gmail.com: Yep, Mel mentioned this in said post of bugs. I may be able to fix this easily Darren VanBuren - Sent from my iPod Take control of your desktop with Fedora 11. Reign. http://fedoraproject.org/ On Sep 30, 2009, at 13:31, Jose Mathew Manimala josemanim...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I created a test blog and one thing I noticed was that a direct link to the dash board was missing on the main page once a FAS authenticated user has logged in. I have been using wordpress as my blog software for over 2.5 years... The dashboard link would be quite essential for bloggers... Just something I noticed. Thanks and Regards Jose M Manimala -- From: Mel Chua m...@redhat.com Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 1:41 AM To: Fedora Infrastructure fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: Blogs site? This seems to be a WordPress issue, with the whole SSL deal. It's pretty much go, but we need to clarify that users should manually login before clicking the signup link in order to circumvent this little issue. Well lets find some victim^H^H^H^H^H^Hvolunteer and get at least one blog in there and document the process all the way through. Anyone want to step forward? FWIW, my first post was a list of bugs I'd found while testing the sign-up process: https://blogs.fedoraproject.org/wp/mchua/2009/08/18/hello-world/. I didn't think of documenting the sign-up process itself in my first post, but that'd make a good first post for someone else to do. I don't recall sign-up taking a terribly long time (certainly way less than 20 minutes). --Mel ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list -- Regards, Hiemanshu Sharma. ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkrEHP0ACgkQBkMMSWb0YpZd6wCgifW+HvOBerLC2H9UvKKSwRTl fdsAn3q5USH00ilHbjwcrgpw17vpnGE5 =mlmg -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list -- Regards, Hiemanshu Sharma. ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Blogs site?
But what I wanted to add was that will there be menu shortcuts added to the front page once a user has logged in for the dash board. Me being a regular word press multi user for a long time was easily used to goto the url https://blogs.fp.o/wp/my-blog/wp-admin :). Its a very minor fix as Darren has put it... Jose Mathew Manimala Darren VanBuren wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I sucked at making the screencast ;-) I mean really sucked. I might try again in the near future. Darren VanBuren onekop...@gmail.com http://theoks.net/ On Sep 30, 2009, at 8:03 PM, Hiemanshu Sharma wrote: We could have the signup and requirements on the main blog amongst other FAQ as well. Darren was telling he was making a screencast. But i have no idea what happened to it. Darren you gonna do it? Regards, Hiemanshu Sharma. 2009/10/1 Darren VanBuren onekop...@gmail.com: Yep, Mel mentioned this in said post of bugs. I may be able to fix this easily Darren VanBuren - Sent from my iPod Take control of your desktop with Fedora 11. Reign. http://fedoraproject.org/ On Sep 30, 2009, at 13:31, Jose Mathew Manimala josemanim...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I created a test blog and one thing I noticed was that a direct link to the dash board was missing on the main page once a FAS authenticated user has logged in. I have been using wordpress as my blog software for over 2.5 years... The dashboard link would be quite essential for bloggers... Just something I noticed. Thanks and Regards Jose M Manimala -- From: Mel Chua m...@redhat.com Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 1:41 AM To: Fedora Infrastructure fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: Blogs site? This seems to be a WordPress issue, with the whole SSL deal. It's pretty much go, but we need to clarify that users should manually login before clicking the signup link in order to circumvent this little issue. Well lets find some victim^H^H^H^H^H^Hvolunteer and get at least one blog in there and document the process all the way through. Anyone want to step forward? FWIW, my first post was a list of bugs I'd found while testing the sign-up process: https://blogs.fedoraproject.org/wp/mchua/2009/08/18/hello-world/. I didn't think of documenting the sign-up process itself in my first post, but that'd make a good first post for someone else to do. I don't recall sign-up taking a terribly long time (certainly way less than 20 minutes). --Mel ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list -- Regards, Hiemanshu Sharma. ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkrEHP0ACgkQBkMMSWb0YpZd6wCgifW+HvOBerLC2H9UvKKSwRTl fdsAn3q5USH00ilHbjwcrgpw17vpnGE5 =mlmg -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
