Re: Ok. Looks like this one _may_ fulfill our calendering needs. Testing required.
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009, susmit shannigrahi wrote: The page you link is only for the sync server, which doesn't appear to be mandatory. It provides Funambol, Outlook and Mozilla sync services. I would think that once OBM's CalDav support is complete you wouldn't really need the sync server... Hmm... The synchronization with thunerbird doesnt seem to be working. I seem to notice that the base_url/obm-sync/services url is not exposed, which is required by the OBM connector for thunderbird. is there an .htaccess configuration or something that needs to be set? It needs sun java, so unacceptable in the infrastructure. We need to look an alternative method for that. Please refer to Adam's mail above. Thanks. It really doesn't work with the java versions that ship with Fedora? :( -Mike ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Ok. Looks like this one _may_ fulfill our calendering needs. Testing required.
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009, jose manimala wrote: did you have time to look at zimbra community edition? Actually this might not be a bad idea. I wonder how hard it is to disable the email portion :) -Mike On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 7:58 AM, susmit shannigrahi thinklinux@gmail.com wrote: The page you link is only for the sync server, which doesn't appear to be mandatory. It provides Funambol, Outlook and Mozilla sync services. I would think that once OBM's CalDav support is complete you wouldn't really need the sync server... Hmm... The synchronization with thunerbird doesnt seem to be working. I seem to notice that the base_url/obm-sync/services url is not exposed, which is required by the OBM connector for thunderbird. is there an .htaccess configuration or something that needs to be set? It needs sun java, so unacceptable in the infrastructure. We need to look an alternative method for that. Please refer to Adam's mail above. Thanks. -- Regards, Susmit. = ssh 0x86DD170A http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/user:susmit = ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list -- Jose M Manimala http://www.jmmblog.in.eu.org Ph: +919790824111 GPGkeyID: F5DD9656 ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Ok. Looks like this one _may_ fulfill our calendering needs. Testing required.
On 19/10/09 14:42, Mike McGrath wrote: On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: On 10/19/2009 03:31 PM, Mike McGrath wrote: On Sun, 18 Oct 2009, jose manimala wrote: did you have time to look at zimbra community edition? Are we kidding ourselves? Zimbra ships the entire required stack for free. If you're going this route (use full-blown Groupware for calandering), I can recommend Zarafa -which does not ship its own MySQL binaries (amongst all others required), uses the system stack (including options to move/change MTAs), does not install in /opt, and is currently under review to be included with Fedora. My $.02 We wouldn't be allowed to use the default one that zimbra ships anyway, our policies require it to be up for review. Zarafa can certainly be added to the list though :) -Mike ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list Please forgive me, if I am blind or not awake enough, but Zarafa appears to be a paid for solution. I can not seem to find a free version. So where is a foss version ? Regards, Tristan -- Tristan Santore BSc MBCS TS4523-RIPE Network and Infrastructure Operations InterNexusConnect Mobile +44-78-55069812 tristan.sant...@internexusconnect.net Thawte Notary For Fedora related issues, please email me at: tsant...@fedoraproject.org smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Ok. Looks like this one _may_ fulfill our calendering needs. Testing required.
On 19/10/09 18:25, Tristan Santore wrote: On 19/10/09 14:42, Mike McGrath wrote: On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: On 10/19/2009 03:31 PM, Mike McGrath wrote: On Sun, 18 Oct 2009, jose manimala wrote: did you have time to look at zimbra community edition? Are we kidding ourselves? Zimbra ships the entire required stack for free. If you're going this route (use full-blown Groupware for calandering), I can recommend Zarafa -which does not ship its own MySQL binaries (amongst all others required), uses the system stack (including options to move/change MTAs), does not install in /opt, and is currently under review to be included with Fedora. My $.02 We wouldn't be allowed to use the default one that zimbra ships anyway, our policies require it to be up for review. Zarafa can certainly be added to the list though :) -Mike ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list Please forgive me, if I am blind or not awake enough, but Zarafa appears to be a paid for solution. I can not seem to find a free version. So where is a foss version ? Regards, Tristan ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list Apologies, just after I sent the email, I found the link. http://www.zarafa.com/content/download-community For anyone wishing to review this. Regards, Tristan -- Tristan Santore BSc MBCS TS4523-RIPE Network and Infrastructure Operations InterNexusConnect Mobile +44-78-55069812 tristan.sant...@internexusconnect.net Thawte Notary For Fedora related issues, please email me at: tsant...@fedoraproject.org smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
getting involved
Hello! I've sent you and e-mail some time ago, but I didn't get any reaction. I'd really like to start developing some kind of software, and not only because that's so good, but it seems to me that this is the only way you can really learn programming. So please, give me some kind of reaction. Thanks! -- Sándor Levente ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: getting involved
On 19/10/09 18:55, Sándor Levente wrote: Hello! I've sent you and e-mail some time ago, but I didn't get any reaction. I'd really like to start developing some kind of software, and not only because that's so good, but it seems to me that this is the only way you can really learn programming. So please, give me some kind of reaction. Thanks! -- Sándor Levente ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list Hello Sandor, first of all this is the infrastructure list, so we generally talk about Fedora infrastructure stuff here, however, I have a suggestion to make. Why don't you join #fedora-devel, and maybe one of the guys will be happy to have you as part of their development effort. There are loads of projects out there to participate in, and people willing to learn and participate are always welcome. I hope this will help you find a software development spot. All the best. Tristan -- Tristan Santore BSc MBCS TS4523-RIPE Network and Infrastructure Operations InterNexusConnect Mobile +44-78-55069812 tristan.sant...@internexusconnect.net Thawte Notary For Fedora related issues, please email me at: tsant...@fedoraproject.org smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: getting involved
Sorry for writing to this list but I've read that howto and it said so. Anyway, thanks for answer, I'll try that! -- Sándor Levente ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: getting involved
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Sándor Levente wrote: Hello! I've sent you and e-mail some time ago, but I didn't get any reaction. I'd really like to start developing some kind of software, and not only because that's so good, but it seems to me that this is the only way you can really learn programming. So please, give me some kind of reaction. Do you have a good idea on what you want to work on? Starting there is good, otherwise you risk getting stuck developing something you're not interested in which is usually a bad thing for volunteers :) Also, just making sure, have you seen this site? http://join.fedoraproject.org/ -Mike___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
LAST FTF (FedoraTalk FAD) IRC Prep meeting :: 2009-10-20 @ 19:00 UTC (3 PM EDT/12 PM PDT)
Time: 3 PM EDT (19:00 UTC) Date: 2009-10-20 Location: #fedora-fad We'll be meeting one last time tomorrow in #fedora-fad to discuss our progress and things we need to be thinking about for Friday's kickoff--wow, can you believe we're doing this thing for real starting on Friday?! PLEASE, if you haven't had a chance, review the use cases we have so far and add on to them, change them, etc. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Talk_User_Cases https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Talk_Admin_Cases I will be linking the infrastructure tickets to the applicable cases. As I sat down to try and summarize the tickets I found that this to be a natural and probably better way to do it. Also, check out Bruno's excellent detailed steps on setting up asterisk. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FAD_Fedora_Talk_2009_game_plan#Asterisk_Packages_.26_Installation_Instructions John ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Emergency Change Freeze Request
We notcied that there was no apache logging on cvs1. this is because the selinux policy was preventing apache from writing log files. For now i have set selinux to permissive mode until we can fix the policy correctly. Dennis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Emergency Change Freeze Request
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Dennis Gilmore wrote: We notcied that there was no apache logging on cvs1. this is because the selinux policy was preventing apache from writing log files. For now i have set selinux to permissive mode until we can fix the policy correctly. +1 out of curiosity how long has the no logging been going on? -sv ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Ok. Looks like this one _may_ fulfill our calendering needs. Testing required.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 08:31:15 -0500, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: On Sun, 18 Oct 2009, jose manimala wrote: did you have time to look at zimbra community edition? Actually this might not be a bad idea. I wonder how hard it is to disable the email portion :) It's less funny than you'd think. At work we use Zimbra and if you forward your email (without keeping a copy) the built in calendaring stuff doesn't work very well. You have to use the ics attachment (for the meeting invite or update) in the forwarded email in a tool to store the message in their calendar system. I don't think we (my work) ever asked them to fix this, because so far very people both forward their email and care about calendar invites. So it might not really be a hard thing to fix. ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Emergency Change Freeze Request
On Monday 19 October 2009 09:07:59 pm Seth Vidal wrote: On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Dennis Gilmore wrote: We notcied that there was no apache logging on cvs1. this is because the selinux policy was preventing apache from writing log files. For now i have set selinux to permissive mode until we can fix the policy correctly. +1 out of curiosity how long has the no logging been going on? long enough that the log files that were there are gone. my guess is since Date: Mon Sep 21 08:43:31 2009 -0500 when enforcing mode was turned on. Dennis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Emergency Change Freeze Request
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Dennis Gilmore wrote: On Monday 19 October 2009 09:07:59 pm Seth Vidal wrote: On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Dennis Gilmore wrote: We notcied that there was no apache logging on cvs1. this is because the selinux policy was preventing apache from writing log files. For now i have set selinux to permissive mode until we can fix the policy correctly. +1 out of curiosity how long has the no logging been going on? long enough that the log files that were there are gone. my guess is since Date: Mon Sep 21 08:43:31 2009 -0500 when enforcing mode was turned on. No audit trails sure make linux more SEcure -Mike ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Emergency Change Freeze Request
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 08:06:08PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: We notcied that there was no apache logging on cvs1. this is because the selinux policy was preventing apache from writing log files. For now i have set selinux to permissive mode until we can fix the policy correctly. What were the specific SELinux denials? I don't see any AVCs on cvs1, nor have I seen any since we flipped it to enforcing mode. How did you come to this conclusion? luke ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Emergency Change Freeze Request
On Monday 19 October 2009 09:55:50 pm Luke Macken wrote: On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 08:06:08PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: We notcied that there was no apache logging on cvs1. this is because the selinux policy was preventing apache from writing log files. For now i have set selinux to permissive mode until we can fix the policy correctly. What were the specific SELinux denials? I don't see any AVCs on cvs1, nor have I seen any since we flipped it to enforcing mode. How did you come to this conclusion? the bunch of httpd messages i got while tailing /var/log/audit/audit.log however looking at it now it doesnt seem related to logging. doing a graceful of httpd after setting enforcing to permissive enabled logs to work again. Dennis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
