Re: fedora.redhat.com is no more
On 3/19/07, Jerry Amundson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/19/07, Mike McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We now have a redirect for fedora.redhat.com. If you have anything specific you'd like redirected please let me know. Though these redirects will only be temporary. On the AccountSystem page https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ there are links such as Edit Your Account - https://admin.fedora.redhat.com/accounts/userbox.cgi?_edit=1 ... the Common Name mis-match causes the cert. to fail. But, going directly to https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/userbox.cgi?_edit=1 works fine, of course... jerry -- Oh joy! Rapture! I've got a brain -Scarecrow ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: intro. and help offer
On 3/14/07, Dennis Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Every package included in Fedora must be peer reviewed. So what you need to do is follow the procedure http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines Yes, that's the link I need. Thank you! jerry -- Oh joy! Rapture! I've got a brain -Scarecrow ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: DHCP and our hosts
On 13 Mar 2007 10:08:39 +0100, Benny Amorsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MM == Mike McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: MM [1] AFAIK DHCP cannot be done on aliased interfaces because it MM shares a MAC with the physical interface. The DHCP protocol apparently allows one MAC address to acquire several IP addresses, with client identifiers. It looks like ISC DHCPD supports that. That'd be good. I'm inclined to use dhcp wherever possible... jerry -- Oh joy! Rapture! I've got a brain -Scarecrow ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: intro. and help offer
On 3/13/07, Mike McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jerry Amundson wrote: bacula testing (needs to get into extras) Excellent, Would you mind helping getting bacula into extras - http://bugzilla.redhat.com/230344 Sure. I'd be happy to help on that one. jerry -- Oh joy! Rapture! I've got a brain -Scarecrow ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: intro. and help offer
Per AccountSystem, this account I just created, currently includes the various CVS repositories and Bugzilla. It didn't. I created a Bugzilla account using the *e-mail address* of my account system registration. That may not have been the right thing... On 3/13/07, Jerry Amundson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/13/07, Mike McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jerry Amundson wrote: bacula testing (needs to get into extras) Excellent, Would you mind helping getting bacula into extras - http://bugzilla.redhat.com/230344 So this needs to be assigned to me then? (unless there was some original problem with the account, above, and I should be able to do so myself...) Procedural things... 1. Andreas Thienemann, who opened said bug, seemed well into this already - was this lucrative position offered to Andreas first? ;-) 2. Upstream is actively releasing a src.rpm - is there any criteria whereby upstream's is used... hmm, I guess first requirement is ability to rpmbuild --rebuild, which this doesn't... I'll shut up and start working now. :-) jerry -- Oh joy! Rapture! I've got a brain -Scarecrow ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
