Re: change request: [[MediaWiki:Common.css]]
+1 from me :)
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 20:54 -0500, Ian Weller wrote:
(cc docs)
Request to change https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Common.css to
the following:
=
.messagebox.wikicleanup {
background-image: url(/w/uploads/7/72/Wiki-cleanup-background.png);
background-repeat: repeat;
}
=
Reason: to allow for [[Template:Wiki cleanup]] (a new admonition to
replace using {{admon/note}} in {{move}}, {{delete}}, etc) to stand out
from other admonitions as not being alerting to the user, but rather to
wiki gardeners.
The reason this can't be done right in the template is because MediaWiki
is very, very careful about external images (even though this one is
technically internal).
Effect on remainder of wiki/website/world: Little to none. An error
should have no effect on the rest of the style of the wiki, except for
user styles. I do not believe there to be an error in the above.
Why I'm asking: I have to wield my sysop powers on the wiki to do this,
and I just wanted to make sure it was cool (especially since we're in a
change freeze). Why I'm asking now: I'll forget later.
--
fedora-docs-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
--
Karsten Wade, Community Gardener
Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
gpg key : AD0E0C41
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
static F10 Alpha relnotes page
Do we want to turn this page static for the Alpha release? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/10/Alpha/ReleaseNotes I put out the last call for changes and am making a few myself. Is there a good target for calling to static for now? We'll want to make sure we can edit it. Perhaps as part of making it static we can tell people to post changes to the talk page, then we'll do irregular updates of the static content? Thanks - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: [Fwd: Wiki migration - lost content]
On Sun, 2008-06-08 at 11:18 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: It was explained in multiple emails that people shouldn't even bother reporting this stuff, just fix it. I responded to the user directly, and turned that in to this: http://iquaid.org/2008/06/12/wiki-update-lost-content-and-l10n/ This early after the migration, we gain from using each of these QA sessions as publicity about how to Do The Right Thing. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Blog syndication for GSoC - ers
On Sat, 2008-05-24 at 23:27 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: Alternatively, perhaps we should just have an GSoC group? These guys are technically contributors... I didn't realize this discussion was cross-posted, I already sent my agreement to this idea to the other thread. Having a group 'gsoc_2008' or 'summercoders_2008' could help more than just this problem. As was said elsewhere, these _are_ Fedora contributors, but they don't all fit directly in to an existing group, or their contributions are being filtered outside of the group. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Blog syndication for GSoC - ers
On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 10:28 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: On Tue, 27 May 2008, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote: On Sat, 2008-05-24 at 23:27 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: Alternatively, perhaps we should just have an GSoC group? These guys are technically contributors... I didn't realize this discussion was cross-posted, I already sent my agreement to this idea to the other thread. Having a group 'gsoc_2008' or 'summercoders_2008' could help more than just this problem. As was said elsewhere, these _are_ Fedora contributors, but they don't all fit directly in to an existing group, or their contributions are being filtered outside of the group. Why not just gsoc? I don't understand what we gain from the _2008? Gain, not sure. Lose, the ability to differentiate between groups. A main purpose of GSoC is to get more coders into more projects. For this reason, all students who stick around Fedora should be in other groups. Their continued presence in last year's group should *not* be construed as an ongoing contributor effort. By the end of this Summer, the group is essentially defunct. If that is the only group someone is in, and six months later ... it's still the only group, then they aren't contributing to any coding projects. If they move on to Ambassadors, then they are in another group, are contributing, etc. Does that make sense? For a similar reason, I recommend a generic name. Maybe all interns and summer coders could be in the group. That way we can include the Finnish Summer Code effort into this, and any RHT interns that aren't part of another group (yet.) - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
OpenID and CLA
Just doing some thinking ... If we want to move our OpenID acceptance outside of Fedora's OpenID server, we'll have a blocker with the CLA. AIUI, we need someone to knowingly accept the CLA and have that tied to a Real Name and email address in our database. Right? However, OpenID could be a good way to get permissions to Talk: pages. That is a great way to get feedback from drive-bys, the kind of people who might take advantage of an OpenID to make a minor change on a page. Content in Talk: could be treated procedurally as we do bug reports. Maybe we can have a WikiLicense type of thing (FedoraProject:Copyrights link enough?) for that? Either way, Talk: could be a discussion area, cf. mailing lists and bugzilla, that may produce content. If someone gives specific wording and we want to use it, and now or later modify it, redistribute it, etc., it needs to be under the CLA and site license. This is comparable to receiving a patch via bugzilla where the contributor should include licensing text. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: user-added planet script
On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 12:44 -0400, seth vidal wrote: On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 19:20 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote: Add here probably a language for when/if we will have language based sub-planets. It is possible to have multiple values, like language = english, french for the case when someone blogs about half the time in one language and half in another? actually I was thinking of just having different .planet files: .planet.fr == planet french .planet.art = planet art etc, etc. a simple type of group. +1 ... I like the whole thing, this is a nice level of self-service. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
