F10?
So F9 is out the door and we had a very exciting last 6 months. Here's the short list: * FAS2 * /mnt/koji migration and deployment * Backup system up and running * Collaboration servers brought up (gobby and asterisk POC) * UTC switch The focus for this last release was mostly around sanity. Cleaning up some configs, things like that. We actually did a very good job of that. All in all I feel it was a good release. So my question to the team, what would you all like to see over the next 6 months? -Mike ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: F10?
On Monday 19 May 2008, Mike McGrath wrote: > So F9 is out the door and we had a very exciting last 6 months. Here's > the short list: > > * FAS2 > * /mnt/koji migration and deployment > * Backup system up and running > * Collaboration servers brought up (gobby and asterisk POC) > * UTC switch > > The focus for this last release was mostly around sanity. Cleaning up > some configs, things like that. We actually did a very good job of that. > > All in all I feel it was a good release. So my question to the team, what > would you all like to see over the next 6 months? new ca infrastructure. Dennis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: F10?
On 2008-05-19 10:27:52 PM, Mike McGrath wrote: > All in all I feel it was a good release. So my question to the team, what > would you all like to see over the next 6 months? * New wiki :-) * More/better documentation * FAS improvements + Certificate Authority * A more complete test environment? * Asterisk coolness? Thanks, Ricky pgpbJ8SLsLyMq.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: F10?
Mike McGrath wrote: So F9 is out the door and we had a very exciting last 6 months. Here's the short list: * FAS2 * /mnt/koji migration and deployment * Backup system up and running * Collaboration servers brought up (gobby and asterisk POC) * UTC switch The focus for this last release was mostly around sanity. Cleaning up some configs, things like that. We actually did a very good job of that. All in all I feel it was a good release. So my question to the team, what would you all like to see over the next 6 months? I agree, the release went smoothly, compared to what I remember a year back when I was helping out. Some of the 'would be nice' items I guess are: * Logical separation of apps/services - i.e. app2's load really spikes when msgmerge runs (I'm assuming this is l10n stuff, why should this have to run on the same server that runs the wiki etc, if possible it'd be nice to have a similar setup like rel-eng has) * Better load balancing, I'm assuming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Architecture is still technically correct, it'd be nice to have the proxy servers randomly choosing an App server, is this even possible? * Something that Debian has as a service to packagers is machines of various architectures that can be used for debugging/solving build problems, koji scratch builds solve part of the problem, but access to the chroot or something like that would be even better, I know people offer this sort of setup on a 'by request' basis, but if we retiring builders etc in the future, instead of sending them to the graveyard, this is an option. And of course some of the upcoming stuff: * Mediawiki * New DB Server for Koji * Network storage for tarball uploads * Elections App (expect a call for testers soon) - Nigel ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: F10?
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 03:50:49PM +1200, Nigel Jones wrote: > * Better load balancing, I'm assuming > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Architecture is still > technically correct, it'd be nice to have the proxy servers randomly > choosing an App server, is this even possible? Most services are using apache mod_balancer now, so requests first hit a proxy server, then are load-balanced across each of the app servers for each app. -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: F10?
On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 23:44 -0400, Ricky Zhou wrote: > On 2008-05-19 10:27:52 PM, Mike McGrath wrote: > > All in all I feel it was a good release. So my question to the team, what > > would you all like to see over the next 6 months? > * New wiki :-) > * More/better documentation ^ This is where Jef Spaleta's role-based SIG idea, and the Docs team's new direction, might be helpful. If we can get one or more people from Docs hooked up with this team to help, all the work can/should be done on the wiki. Mike and I have talked in the past about the fact that Fedora has a world-class infrastructure and the team to support it. If we can get the details down on "paper," we add substantially to the proposition that Fedora is much more than just a distro. We can have a blueprint for any similar project, or open-source business startup, or anyone who wants to bootstrap their own community, to go from zero to sixty in terms of supporting that community with the tools they need for communication, coding, and presence. Certainly that could take more than six months, but it's a great time to get that off the ground. -- Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: F10?
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:27:52PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > So F9 is out the door and we had a very exciting last 6 months. Here's > the short list: > > * FAS2 > * /mnt/koji migration and deployment > * Backup system up and running > * Collaboration servers brought up (gobby and asterisk POC) > * UTC switch > > The focus for this last release was mostly around sanity. Cleaning up > some configs, things like that. We actually did a very good job of that. > > All in all I feel it was a good release. So my question to the team, what > would you all like to see over the next 6 months? Here are some things I'd like to get done: - Signing server (sigul) - Solidify our SELinux deployment. I'm sitting down with Dan Walsh this week to churn through our logs and fix as much stuff as possible. Brett Lentz (Wakko666) has also been doing a great job of writing test cases and pushing some crucial puppet SELinux changes upstream. - Get our logging situation under control. - Get bodhi into the app cluster, and give it the ability to kick off mashes on our releng boxes. luke ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: F10?
Things I'd like but probably can't work on myself: * GeoIP/DNS based proxying. I'm in Europe and request admin.fedoraproject.org I get the European app server. I'm in the US I get PHX or tummy. - This might make it possible for us to have app servers around the world. We'd still have latency from database calls having to get replies from PHX but for calls between apps all requests would stay in the same colo. Things I'll have a hand in: * New python-fedora API with exception-like error handling client-side and more standardization server-side. - Porting all our web apps to the new architecture. * Optimize db calls within TG applications to make them as snappy as possible. I can do this for SQLAlchemy but SQLObject isn't flexible enough. Any page which is for viewing data and is returning multiple records is potentially a good candidate. * OpenID auth provider for our TG apps (if it's faster/better than our current jsonfas provider). We don't gain any features from an OpenID provider unless we want to allow other OpenID servers to authenticate our users. * pkgdb: I'm going to concentrate on refactoring existing pkgdb code. I'm hoping mapleoin will keep up the good work he's been doing adding new features. * New koji db server. * Moving TG apps from supervisor to mod_wsgi -Toshio ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: F10?
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 09:15:28AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > Things I'd like but probably can't work on myself: [...] > * Optimize db calls within TG applications to make them as snappy as > possible. I can do this for SQLAlchemy but SQLObject isn't flexible > enough. Any page which is for viewing data and is returning multiple > records is potentially a good candidate. Speaking of stuff I'd love to see happen, but don't have the time for :) - Port bodhi to SQLAlchemy luke ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: F10?
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Luke Macken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 09:15:28AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >> Things I'd like but probably can't work on myself: > [...] >> * Optimize db calls within TG applications to make them as snappy as >> possible. I can do this for SQLAlchemy but SQLObject isn't flexible >> enough. Any page which is for viewing data and is returning multiple >> records is potentially a good candidate. > > Speaking of stuff I'd love to see happen, but don't have the time for :) > - Port bodhi to SQLAlchemy Depends on how complicated your stuff is already. If it's mostly just a bunch of tables, and the oddball query, I can probably do it in about a day. If it's alot of complicated composite tables with composite keys, custom data types, custom rules, and massive dependencies, then it could take 2-3 days. Let me know when you need help. ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: F10?
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 02:18:53PM -0400, Yaakov Nemoy wrote: > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Luke Macken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 09:15:28AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > >> Things I'd like but probably can't work on myself: > > [...] > >> * Optimize db calls within TG applications to make them as snappy as > >> possible. I can do this for SQLAlchemy but SQLObject isn't flexible > >> enough. Any page which is for viewing data and is returning multiple > >> records is potentially a good candidate. > > > > Speaking of stuff I'd love to see happen, but don't have the time for :) > > - Port bodhi to SQLAlchemy > > Depends on how complicated your stuff is already. If it's mostly just > a bunch of tables, and the oddball query, I can probably do it in > about a day. If it's alot of complicated composite tables with > composite keys, custom data types, custom rules, and massive > dependencies, then it could take 2-3 days. > > Let me know when you need help. Cool. Give me a week or so to finish up some major bodhi changes that I have underway, and the releng2 migration. I've created a ticket so we can track this task, and I'll let you know when it's safe to dive in. https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/202 Thanks! luke ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: F10?
On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 23:44 -0400, Ricky Zhou wrote: > * Asterisk coolness? I'm almost always available and willing to help out with Asterisk stuff... Let me know if/when you need any help, and I'd be willing to put in some time to add all kinds of Asterisk coolness. -Jared ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
F10 Beta release
Great job with the release this morning, guys. I know there were some gremlins in a torrent or two, but overall very painless and you guys made it look easy (as always). Hurrah, another milestone on the path to Cambridge! If anyone has any issues, we could plant them on a page for the next release day planning group call. -- Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug pgpxyHXOfH9oa.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: F10 Beta release
Paul W. Frields said the following on 09/30/2008 02:40 PM Pacific Time: Great job with the release this morning, guys. I know there were some gremlins in a torrent or two, but overall very painless and you guys made it look easy (as always). Hurrah, another milestone on the path to Cambridge! If anyone has any issues, we could plant them on a page for the next release day planning group call. One idea I had... could we be very explicit when we tell people where to file bugs by giving them a full URL to rawhide so they don't have navigate the bugzilla gauntlet? Does anyone know how to format the URL so it goes straight to "new bug for rawhide?" John ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: F10 Beta release
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, Paul W. Frields wrote: > Great job with the release this morning, guys. I know there were some > gremlins in a torrent or two, but overall very painless and you guys > made it look easy (as always). Hurrah, another milestone on the path > to Cambridge! > > If anyone has any issues, we could plant them on a page for the next > release day planning group call. > I'd like to give a shout out to Seth Vidal and the guys at ibiblio for getting the new torrent server installed and ready in a very short time span. Also, unrelated to torrent, I'd like to point out some other metrics I've been putting together for release days: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/zabbix/charts.php?fullscreen=0&groupid=0&hostid=10071&graphid=380 and https://admin.fedoraproject.org/zabbix/charts.php?fullscreen=0&groupid=0&hostid=10071&graphid=379 Those are updated every 30 seconds (right now at least) and give a view of hits / second for mirrors and the wiki. This is something we can watch on release day instead of sitting around saying things like "are they here yet?" :) In the future it may also help diagnose problems. -Mike ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: F10 Beta release
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 23:59:40 John Poelstra wrote: > One idea I had... could we be very explicit when we tell people where to > file bugs by giving them a full URL to rawhide so they don't have > navigate the bugzilla gauntlet? > > Does anyone know how to format the URL so it goes straight to "new bug > for rawhide?" How about this URL? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&version=rawhide You can also go to "create new bug report", select Fedora and then notice the "remember values and create bookmarkable template" button to preselect more. Regards, TIll signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Change request, F10 updates
In order to push out the first round of Fedora 10 updates, a few changes need to be made in the infrastructure. 1) add the 10 release to fedora-updates-push in puppet 2) Update bodhi with 10 mash configs Can I get a few +1s on this? -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
static F10 Alpha relnotes page
Do we want to turn this page static for the Alpha release? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/10/Alpha/ReleaseNotes I put out the last call for changes and am making a few myself. Is there a good target for calling to static for now? We'll want to make sure we can edit it. Perhaps as part of making it static we can tell people to post changes to the talk page, then we'll do irregular updates of the static content? Thanks - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
metalinks for F10 download pages
mirrors.fp.o now supports metalinks [1]. metalinks are XML documents that act like a yum mirrorlist, but with more detail, allowing client download tools to more easily select a mirror that will be fastest for them. Just as you have the BitTorrent, Direct Download, and Jigdo columns now, I'd like to consider adding a Metalink column. It's easy to get the metalink URL for a given download.fp.o ISO URL. http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/test/10-Beta/Fedora/i386/iso/Fedora-10-Beta-i386-DVD.iso becomes http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?path=pub/fedora/linux/releases/test/10-Beta/Fedora/i386/iso/Fedora-10-Beta-i386-DVD.iso (e.g. s:download:mirrors:, s:pub(.*):metalink?path=pub$1: ) Let me know if you have any questions. If you wanted to add them to the 10-Beta download page now, that'd be fine with me too. Thanks, Matt Fedora Mirror Wrangler. [1] http://metalinker.org/ -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Change request, F10 updates
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008, Jesse Keating wrote: In order to push out the first round of Fedora 10 updates, a few changes need to be made in the infrastructure. 1) add the 10 release to fedora-updates-push in puppet 2) Update bodhi with 10 mash configs Can I get a few +1s on this? +1 -sv ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Change request, F10 updates
2008/11/21 Jesse Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > In order to push out the first round of Fedora 10 updates, a few changes > need to be made in the infrastructure. > > 1) add the 10 release to fedora-updates-push in puppet > > 2) Update bodhi with 10 mash configs > > Can I get a few +1s on this? > > -- > Jesse Keating > Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! > identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating > > ___ > Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list > Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list > > +1 --sg ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Change request, F10 updates
Jesse Keating ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > In order to push out the first round of Fedora 10 updates, a few changes > need to be made in the infrastructure. > > 1) add the 10 release to fedora-updates-push in puppet > > 2) Update bodhi with 10 mash configs > > Can I get a few +1s on this? +1 Bill ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: static F10 Alpha relnotes page
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 01:57 -0700, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote: > Do we want to turn this page static for the Alpha release? > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/10/Alpha/ReleaseNotes > > I put out the last call for changes and am making a few myself. Is > there a good target for calling to static for now? To be perfectly honest, I'm not sure we need to worry about it until the actual release (even them I'm not sure we'll need to). The wiki's internal caching and mod_cache seem to be useful enough together (yet a pain for some other things) that for anonymous users it'll be cached anyway. We now have 3 machines handling wiki data, and it is from a fairly powerful DB, so where the caching doesn't help the backend should be able to pull the weight. > > We'll want to make sure we can edit it. Perhaps as part of making it > static we can tell people to post changes to the talk page, then we'll > do irregular updates of the static content? When making changes to the page, you'd need to go to https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Releases/10/Alpha/ReleaseNotes&action=purge (I'm 99% sure that this will work for all users). Basically it'll wipe the MW cache etc and display the fresh copy. I think this would be a rather interesting experiment and I am sure that Mediawiki will pass with flying colours :). And well, if it does turn out we need to use static pages, then it's not that hard to do :). - Nigel ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: static F10 Alpha relnotes page
On 2008-08-05 12:57:54 AM, Nigel Jones wrote: > I think this would be a rather interesting experiment and I am sure that > Mediawiki will pass with flying colours :). And well, if it does turn > out we need to use static pages, then it's not that hard to do :). +1 - I think mod_rewriting to static pages should be a thing of the past :-) Thanks, Ricky pgpMlwgnBGdUY.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: static F10 Alpha relnotes page
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008, Nigel Jones wrote: > Basically it'll wipe the MW cache etc and display the fresh copy. > > I think this would be a rather interesting experiment and I am sure that > Mediawiki will pass with flying colours :). And well, if it does turn > out we need to use static pages, then it's not that hard to do :). > I'd also prefer not to do anything unless we see something fail. During the actual release it might be good to turn some pages static but not actually use them. Then its just a config push away from going live in case the wiki does fail. AFAIK the wiki has no performance issues when people are not logged in (this includes most people during release day) and as far as when people are logged in its due to how we're doing session management. Ricky's currently looking into one alternative and there's others to look at if it fails for whatever reason. -Mike ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: metalinks for F10 download pages
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 11:32 PM, Matt Domsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?path=pub/fedora/linux/releases/test/10-Beta/Fedora/i386/iso/Fedora-10-Beta-i386-DVD.iso Are these links supposed to work in Firefox (at least for testing)? I get "# Server Error" when I click on it in Firefox. -- Jeff Ollie "You know, I used to think it was awful that life was so unfair. Then I thought, wouldn't it be much worse if life were fair, and all the terrible things that happen to us come because we actually deserve them? So, now I take great comfort in the general hostility and unfairness of the universe." -- Marcus to Franklin in Babylon 5: "A Late Delivery from Avalon" ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: metalinks for F10 download pages
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 08:34 -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > > Are these links supposed to work in Firefox (at least for testing)? I > get "# Server Error" when I click on it in Firefox. There was some MirrorManager work done yesterday, are you still seeing this issue? -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: metalinks for F10 download pages
2008/10/3 Jesse Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 08:34 -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: >> >> Are these links supposed to work in Firefox (at least for testing)? I >> get "# Server Error" when I click on it in Firefox. > > There was some MirrorManager work done yesterday, are you still seeing > this issue? Seems to be working now. -- Jeff Ollie "You know, I used to think it was awful that life was so unfair. Then I thought, wouldn't it be much worse if life were fair, and all the terrible things that happen to us come because we actually deserve them? So, now I take great comfort in the general hostility and unfairness of the universe." -- Marcus to Franklin in Babylon 5: "A Late Delivery from Avalon" ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Change request: add dist-f10-build as a static repo
When we created the dist-f10 build targets I forgot to create a
corresponding static-repo for it. This diff will create one, and allow
people who are working on F10 actually be able to populate buildroots
from the f10 content and match koji.
RCS file: /cvs/puppet/configs/build/update-static-repos.py,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.4 update-static-repos.py
--- build/update-static-repos.py14 Mar 2008 03:17:42 - 1.4
+++ build/update-static-repos.py12 May 2008 14:20:38 -
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
import sys
import koji
-TAGS = ('dist-olpc2-build', 'dist-fc7-build', 'dist-f8-build',
'dist-f9-build', 'dist-rawhide', 'olpc2-trial3', 'olpc2-update1',
'olpc2-ship2')
+TAGS = ('dist-olpc2-build', 'dist-fc7-build', 'dist-f8-build',
'dist-f9-build', 'dist-f10-build', 'dist-rawhide', 'olpc2-trial3',
'olpc2-update1', 'olpc2-ship2')
STATICPATH = '/mnt/koji/static-repos'
SUFFIX = '-current'
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Change request: add dist-f10-build as a static repo
On Mon, 12 May 2008, Jesse Keating wrote:
> When we created the dist-f10 build targets I forgot to create a
> corresponding static-repo for it. This diff will create one, and allow
> people who are working on F10 actually be able to populate buildroots
> from the f10 content and match koji.
>
> RCS file: /cvs/puppet/configs/build/update-static-repos.py,v
> retrieving revision 1.4
> diff -u -r1.4 update-static-repos.py
> --- build/update-static-repos.py 14 Mar 2008 03:17:42 - 1.4
> +++ build/update-static-repos.py 12 May 2008 14:20:38 -
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
> import sys
> import koji
>
> -TAGS = ('dist-olpc2-build', 'dist-fc7-build', 'dist-f8-build',
> 'dist-f9-build', 'dist-rawhide', 'olpc2-trial3', 'olpc2-update1',
> 'olpc2-ship2')
> +TAGS = ('dist-olpc2-build', 'dist-fc7-build', 'dist-f8-build',
> 'dist-f9-build', 'dist-f10-build', 'dist-rawhide', 'olpc2-trial3',
> 'olpc2-update1', 'olpc2-ship2')
> STATICPATH = '/mnt/koji/static-repos'
> SUFFIX = '-current'
>
+1
-Mike
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Change request: add dist-f10-build as a static repo
On Monday 12 May 2008, Jesse Keating wrote:
> When we created the dist-f10 build targets I forgot to create a
> corresponding static-repo for it. This diff will create one, and allow
> people who are working on F10 actually be able to populate buildroots
> from the f10 content and match koji.
>
> RCS file: /cvs/puppet/configs/build/update-static-repos.py,v
> retrieving revision 1.4
> diff -u -r1.4 update-static-repos.py
> --- build/update-static-repos.py 14 Mar 2008 03:17:42 - 1.4
> +++ build/update-static-repos.py 12 May 2008 14:20:38 -
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
> import sys
> import koji
>
> -TAGS = ('dist-olpc2-build', 'dist-fc7-build', 'dist-f8-build',
> 'dist-f9-build', 'dist-rawhide', 'olpc2-trial3', 'olpc2-update1',
> 'olpc2-ship2')
> +TAGS = ('dist-olpc2-build', 'dist-fc7-build', 'dist-f8-build',
> 'dist-f9-build', 'dist-f10-build', 'dist-rawhide', 'olpc2-trial3',
> 'olpc2-update1', 'olpc2-ship2')
> STATICPATH = '/mnt/koji/static-repos'
> SUFFIX = '-current'
I forgot to add one for dist-olpc3-build when i set it up. can we add it
also ?
we can drop olpc2-trial3
Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Change request: add dist-f10-build as a static repo
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 09:30 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > I forgot to add one for dist-olpc3-build when i set it up. can we add > it > also ? > we can drop olpc2-trial3 +1 go ahead. I already did my change but you can still get yours in before the cron job hits in 10~ minutes. > -- Jesse Keating RHCE (jkeating.livejournal.com) Fedora Project (fedoraproject.org/wiki/JesseKeating) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
