Re: more mirrormanager testing

[Ask Bjørn Hansen]

On Apr 10, 2007, at 7:30 AM, Matt Domsch wrote:

Is there any feed back on why stuff isn't appearing? my FC stuff  
is there

but the extras havn't showed up?


yep, just found it.  Congrats, you found a bug in my crawler.  You're
issuing a 301 redirect to an intra-site link, which is fine, except
that the crawler wasn't expecting it.  All previous redirects I've
seen were to ftp://... which works fine.  I need to teach the crawler
how to handle these site-relative redirects.  Then it'll work.


Actually, the URI specified in the Location: header is supposed to be  
an absolute URL (with http://host/...).


http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sec14.30

(of course, most/all browsers makes it work anyway.)


  - ask

--
http://develooper.com/ - http://askask.com/


___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

Re: more mirrormanager testing

[Matthew Miller]

If you accidentally add something to "Countries allowed", is there a secret
way to remove it?

-- 
Matthew Miller   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
Boston University Linux  -->  

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

Re: more mirrormanager testing

[Matthew Miller]

On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 10:03:22AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Doh.  I need to add a delete button there.  Thanks for catching it.
> (it's not used right now, so don't sweat it).

I'm just as useful as one of those programs that clicks on things randomly
to see if something crashes. :)

-- 
Matthew Miller   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
Boston University Linux  -->  

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

Re: more mirrormanager testing

[archive-admin]

Ok I put in a cdir block in the host access as it could come from one of
nine ip's depending on which box really has the mirror on it... I am not
sure if thats going to work.

Also you probably want to check the iso country codes
http://www.iso.org/iso/en/prods-services/iso3166ma/02iso-3166-code-lists/list-en1.html
I notice entries in both cases and also for the UK which isnt a vaild
iso code 'GB is for the United Kingdom'... I guess UKRAINE wannted UK
though a guess the compromise was no one to have it as they seem to have
ended up with UA.

Thanks

Phill.

On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Matt Domsch wrote:

> Mirror Admins:
>
> Thank you to the several people who have put their data into
> mirrormanager https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mirrormanager/ already.
> I've made a few tweaks in the past week to speed up the queries, and
> it seems to be working pretty well[1].
>
> I ask everyone to please enter their data into mirrormanager now, so
> we can shake out any additional bugs before F7 Test 4 is ready to go
> out.
>
> In particular, please create:
> * an account in the Fedora Account System if you haven't already
> * a new Site
> * a new Host in your Site
> * a new ACL IP for your Host (DNS name preferred, IP ok too)
> * two new Category entries, one for Fedora Core, and one for Fedora
>   Extras
> * For each of FC and FE, one or more URLs by which end users can get
>   at your data (HTTP, FTP, and rsync).
>
> With that in place, the http/ftp crawler will come by every 6 hours or
> so looking at what you're carrying.  Each Category page in the web UI
> will show the list of directories you have it thinks are up-to-date.
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mirrormanager/publiclist/
> displays all the active mirrors.  This page (and its children - the
> per-version, per-arch subselect pages) will get exported static soon
> which is what we'll publicize end users to view.  Likewise the yum
> mirrorlist redirectors are available for playing with with a URL of
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mirrormanager/mirrorlist?repo=core-6&arch=i386
>
> e.g. the same as the normal mirrorlist syntax, just a change in the
> host.  The lists are being exported as static files every few hours
> also, so the standard mirrorlist CGI can use it unchanged, but as
> Infrastructure is moving that particular CGI this week, I haven't
> tested that.
>
>
>
>
> As always, thank you for your generous support of Fedora.  With your
> help, this will be the smoothest Fedora release ever.
>
>
>
> [1] occasionally we have authentication problems with the Fedora
> Account System, but it's much rarer that it had been.  If you hit it,
> please just reload a few times and it'll clear.
>
> [2] per-country lookups on the mirrorlist aren't quite working yet,
> appending &country=XX.  It will soon though...
>
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
>
>

-- 
Archive Admin's at The UK Mirror Service
http://www.mirrorservice.org/

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

Re: more mirrormanager testing

[archive-admin]

On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Matt Domsch wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 08:52:34PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Ok I put in a cdir block in the host access as it could come from one of
> > nine ip's depending on which box really has the mirror on it... I am not
> > sure if thats going to work.
>
> Probably not.  I *think* the Red Hat backend uses tcpwrappers for its
> ACLs, but I don't know. tcpwrappers doesn't use CIDR notation except
> for IPv6, which the masters don't speak.
Its probably ok as I think its currently using the CDIR range I gave when
I last moved the mirror.

Id like to keep the range that way i dont have to poke the list when i add
new hosts etc... or should i make that forget to add to the list when i
add new hosts... ;-)

Thanks..

Phill.


-- 
Archive Admin's at The UK Mirror Service
http://www.mirrorservice.org/

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

Re: more mirrormanager testing

[archive-admin]

Is there any feed back on why stuff isn't appearing? my FC stuff is there
but the extras havn't showed up?

Thanks.

Phill.


On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Matt Domsch wrote:

> Mirror Admins:
>
> Thank you to the several people who have put their data into
> mirrormanager https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mirrormanager/ already.
> I've made a few tweaks in the past week to speed up the queries, and
> it seems to be working pretty well[1].
>
> I ask everyone to please enter their data into mirrormanager now, so
> we can shake out any additional bugs before F7 Test 4 is ready to go
> out.
>
> In particular, please create:
> * an account in the Fedora Account System if you haven't already
> * a new Site
> * a new Host in your Site
> * a new ACL IP for your Host (DNS name preferred, IP ok too)
> * two new Category entries, one for Fedora Core, and one for Fedora
>   Extras
> * For each of FC and FE, one or more URLs by which end users can get
>   at your data (HTTP, FTP, and rsync).
>
> With that in place, the http/ftp crawler will come by every 6 hours or
> so looking at what you're carrying.  Each Category page in the web UI
> will show the list of directories you have it thinks are up-to-date.
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mirrormanager/publiclist/
> displays all the active mirrors.  This page (and its children - the
> per-version, per-arch subselect pages) will get exported static soon
> which is what we'll publicize end users to view.  Likewise the yum
> mirrorlist redirectors are available for playing with with a URL of
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mirrormanager/mirrorlist?repo=core-6&arch=i386
>
> e.g. the same as the normal mirrorlist syntax, just a change in the
> host.  The lists are being exported as static files every few hours
> also, so the standard mirrorlist CGI can use it unchanged, but as
> Infrastructure is moving that particular CGI this week, I haven't
> tested that.
>
>
>
>
> As always, thank you for your generous support of Fedora.  With your
> help, this will be the smoothest Fedora release ever.
>
>
>
> [1] occasionally we have authentication problems with the Fedora
> Account System, but it's much rarer that it had been.  If you hit it,
> please just reload a few times and it'll clear.
>
> [2] per-country lookups on the mirrorlist aren't quite working yet,
> appending &country=XX.  It will soon though...
>
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
>
>

-- 
Archive Admin's at The UK Mirror Service
http://www.mirrorservice.org/

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

Re: more mirrormanager testing

[Gilbert E. Detillieux]

On 2007-04-05 09:08, Matt Domsch wrote:

Mirror Admins:

Thank you to the several people who have put their data into
mirrormanager https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mirrormanager/ already.
I've made a few tweaks in the past week to speed up the queries, and
it seems to be working pretty well[1].

I ask everyone to please enter their data into mirrormanager now, so
we can shake out any additional bugs before F7 Test 4 is ready to go
out.

In particular, please create:
* an account in the Fedora Account System if you haven't already


OK, I go to the URL you specified above, I click on the "register" link 
(https://admin.fedora.redhat.com/accounts), and I get the following error...


502 Bad Gateway
The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server.

Any advice?  I'd _like_ to get an account set up, but I can't see any 
way to do it at the moment.



* a new Site
* a new Host in your Site
* a new ACL IP for your Host (DNS name preferred, IP ok too)
* two new Category entries, one for Fedora Core, and one for Fedora
  Extras
* For each of FC and FE, one or more URLs by which end users can get
  at your data (HTTP, FTP, and rsync).


I imagine I can't enter any of this until _after_ i login with the FAS 
account, which I have yet to create.



[1] occasionally we have authentication problems with the Fedora
Account System, but it's much rarer that it had been.  If you hit it,
please just reload a few times and it'll clear.


I've tried reloading repeatedly, and the 502 error happens consistently.

--
Gilbert E. Detillieux   E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dept. of Computer Science   Web:http://www.cs.umanitoba.ca/~gedetil/
University of Manitoba  Phone:  (204)474-8161
Winnipeg MB CANADA  R3T 2N2 Fax:(204)474-7609

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

RE: more mirrormanager testing

[Matt_Domsch]

Doh.  I need to add a delete button there.  Thanks for catching it.
(it's not used right now, so don't sweat it).

--
Matt Domsch
Software Architect
Dell Linux Solutions www.dell.com/linux
Linux on Dell mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Matthew Miller
Sent: Tue 4/10/2007 9:52 AM
To: A private discussion group for official mirrors of ftp.redhat.com
Cc: fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: more mirrormanager testing
 

If you accidentally add something to "Countries allowed", is there a secret
way to remove it?

-- 
Matthew Miller   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux  -->  <http://linux.bu.edu/>

--

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

Re: more mirrormanager testing

[Matt Domsch]

On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 11:40:44AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> Is there any feed back on why stuff isn't appearing? my FC stuff is there
> but the extras havn't showed up?

yep, just found it.  Congrats, you found a bug in my crawler.  You're
issuing a 301 redirect to an intra-site link, which is fine, except
that the crawler wasn't expecting it.  All previous redirects I've
seen were to ftp://... which works fine.  I need to teach the crawler
how to handle these site-relative redirects.  Then it'll work.

Basically, it got to the core/updates/testing/1/i386/SRPMS directory
and got stuck and eventually died, so it didn't discover stuff after
that (in your case, all of extras).


send: u'HEAD 
http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/updates/testing/1/i386/SRPMS
HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: www.mirrorservice.org\r\nAccept-Encoding:
identity\r\nConnection: Keep-Alive\r\nPragma: no-cache\r\nUser-Agent:
mirrormanager-crawler/0.1 
(+http://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/mirrormanager)\r\n\r\n'
reply: 'HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently\r\n'
header: Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:23:43 GMT
header: Server: Apache/2.0.54 (Debian GNU/Linux)
header: Location: 
/sites/download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/updates/testing/1/i386/SRPMS/
header: Content-Type: text/html
header: Via: 1.1 www.mirrorservice.org


That which kills it makes it stronger. :-)

I'll get that fixed soon.

Thanks,
Matt

-- 
Matt Domsch
Software Architect
Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
Linux on Dell mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

Re: more mirrormanager testing / unacceptable Export Restrictions

[Matt Domsch]

On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 04:30:49AM +0200, Rob van Nieuwkerk wrote:
> Hi Matt,
> 
> I created a FAS account some time ago.  I did not proceed with adding my
> site because this requires that you agree with the "Export Restrictions".
> 
> I don't see many sites added.  Probabaly because most people realize
> that it comes down to this:
> 
>   -
>   If you agree with these Export Restrictions you will violate
>   these rules anytime somone who isn't liked by the US downloads
>   any piece of Fedora from your mirror.
>   -
> 
> Run a mirror, help Red Hat, and get arrested next time you visit the USA ..
> 
> Besides any political or moral right/wrongness of these Export
> Restrictions it is of course TECHNICALLY COMPLETELY IMPOSSIBLE
> to comply with them !!!
> 
> The whole mirrormanager thing will (unfortunatly !) never work
> as long as agreeing to these Export Restrictions is required.

To be fair, this has noting to do with mirrormanager, except that
mirrormanager asks you to say you will comply.

The problem is that the US State Department considers software posted
on the Internet to be exports, and has certain rules about this.  Red
Hat, as a US-based company, must comply with these rules.

In reality, these rules apply today, regardless of mirrormanager.

You and I both know it's impossible to police every download from
every web server in the US or under the control of a US-based company
to ensure the person doing the downloading isn't a national of an
embargoed country, or is on the Denied Parties List or whatever other
rules there are.  And yes, the software has export licenses (license
TSU) allowing it to be exported almost anywhere to almost anyone.
Therein lies the problem - it's not really anyone anywhere, but
"almost".

I think the State Department knows it's impossible too.  They must
know.  So, we show due dilligence.  We have a notice on the FTP site
saying "if you're someone subject to US State Deparment restrictions,
you aren't allowed to download anything here."  But we don't
technically stop anyone from doing so.  The question is, must we
technically stop anyone from doing so?  Apparently not, I haven't
been asked to try - because it's impossible and everyone knows it.

So the notice is our Due Dilligence, and by asking you to agree too,
that's our Due Dilligence.  You post that notice, and it's your Due
Dilligence too.

That's my understanding of it.  IANAL, but as this has come up
repeatedly in the past, this has always been the tacit resolution.

 
> Mirror-admins: be very carful with what you sign or agree to !

Always wise.

-- 
Matt Domsch
Software Architect
Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
Linux on Dell mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

Re: more mirrormanager testing / unacceptable Export Restrictions

[Rob van Nieuwkerk]

On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 09:08:17 -0500
Matt Domsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Mirror Admins:
> 
> Thank you to the several people who have put their data into
> mirrormanager https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mirrormanager/ already.
> I've made a few tweaks in the past week to speed up the queries, and
> it seems to be working pretty well[1].
> 
> I ask everyone to please enter their data into mirrormanager now, so
> we can shake out any additional bugs before F7 Test 4 is ready to go
> out.
> 
> In particular, please create:
> * an account in the Fedora Account System if you haven't already
> * a new Site

Hi Matt,

I created a FAS account some time ago.  I did not proceed with adding my
site because this requires that you agree with the "Export Restrictions".

I don't see many sites added.  Probabaly because most people realize
that it comes down to this:

  -
  If you agree with these Export Restrictions you will violate
  these rules anytime somone who isn't liked by the US downloads
  any piece of Fedora from your mirror.
  -

Run a mirror, help Red Hat, and get arrested next time you visit the USA ..

Besides any political or moral right/wrongness of these Export
Restrictions it is of course TECHNICALLY COMPLETELY IMPOSSIBLE
to comply with them !!!

The whole mirrormanager thing will (unfortunatly !) never work
as long as agreeing to these Export Restrictions is required.

Mirror-admins: be very carful with what you sign or agree to !

friendly greetings,
Rob van Nieuwkerk

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

Re: more mirrormanager testing

[Matt Domsch]

On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 08:52:34PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> Ok I put in a cdir block in the host access as it could come from one of
> nine ip's depending on which box really has the mirror on it... I am not
> sure if thats going to work.

Probably not.  I *think* the Red Hat backend uses tcpwrappers for its
ACLs, but I don't know. tcpwrappers doesn't use CIDR notation except
for IPv6, which the masters don't speak.

I'd recommend just creating 9 entries.  It's just a list after all. :-)


> Also you probably want to check the iso country codes
> http://www.iso.org/iso/en/prods-services/iso3166ma/02iso-3166-code-lists/list-en1.html
> I notice entries in both cases and also for the UK which isnt a vaild
> iso code 'GB is for the United Kingdom'... I guess UKRAINE wannted UK
> though a guess the compromise was no one to have it as they seem to have
> ended up with UA.

Anyone good with python-GeoIP?  I'd love to turn that into a dropdown,
and I know the GeoIP C headers export the actual country list,
continent list, etc. which is very cool.  But I don't see those
exposed via the python bindings.  Or maybe I'm just dense.

Thanks,
Matt

-- 
Matt Domsch
Software Architect
Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
Linux on Dell mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

RE: more mirrormanager testing

[Matt_Domsch]

The Fedora Infrastructure team has been dealing with bad hardware today
on several fronts.  Failure to get to admin.f.r.c/accounts or
admin.f.r.c/mirrormanager is the result.  They're working on it
dilligently, we ask for your continued patience.

Thanks,
Matt

--
Matt Domsch
Software Architect
Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
Linux on Dell mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gilbert E.
Detillieux
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 2:11 PM
To: A private discussion group for official mirrors of ftp.redhat.com
Cc: fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: more mirrormanager testing

On 2007-04-05 09:08, Matt Domsch wrote:
> Mirror Admins:
> 
> Thank you to the several people who have put their data into 
> mirrormanager https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mirrormanager/ already.
> I've made a few tweaks in the past week to speed up the queries, and 
> it seems to be working pretty well[1].
> 
> I ask everyone to please enter their data into mirrormanager now, so 
> we can shake out any additional bugs before F7 Test 4 is ready to go 
> out.
> 
> In particular, please create:
> * an account in the Fedora Account System if you haven't already

OK, I go to the URL you specified above, I click on the "register" link
(https://admin.fedora.redhat.com/accounts), and I get the following
error...

502 Bad Gateway
The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server.

Any advice?  I'd _like_ to get an account set up, but I can't see any
way to do it at the moment.

> * a new Site
> * a new Host in your Site
> * a new ACL IP for your Host (DNS name preferred, IP ok too)
> * two new Category entries, one for Fedora Core, and one for Fedora
>   Extras
> * For each of FC and FE, one or more URLs by which end users can get
>   at your data (HTTP, FTP, and rsync).

I imagine I can't enter any of this until _after_ i login with the FAS
account, which I have yet to create.

> [1] occasionally we have authentication problems with the Fedora
> Account System, but it's much rarer that it had been.  If you hit
it,
> please just reload a few times and it'll clear.

I've tried reloading repeatedly, and the 502 error happens consistently.

-- 
Gilbert E. Detillieux   E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dept. of Computer Science   Web:
http://www.cs.umanitoba.ca/~gedetil/
University of Manitoba  Phone:  (204)474-8161
Winnipeg MB CANADA  R3T 2N2 Fax:(204)474-7609

--

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

Re: more mirrormanager testing

[Matt Domsch]

On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:56:15PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 07:51:12PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > BTW is there a special User-Agent: you use for crawling?
> 
> I don't think so, I'm using httplib directly.  I'll look into adding one.

It will start using:

mirrormanager-crawler/0.1 
(+http://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/mirrormanager)

shortly.

Thanks,
Matt


-- 
Matt Domsch
Software Architect
Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
Linux on Dell mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

Re: more mirrormanager testing

[Matt Domsch]

On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 07:51:12PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 11:06:42AM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 04:28:58PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 09:08:17AM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > > > With that in place, the http/ftp crawler will come by every 6 hours or
> > > > so looking at what you're carrying.  Each Category page in the web UI
> > > > will show the list of directories you have it thinks are up-to-date.
> > > 
> > > I checked the ones for ATrpms and they list FC1-FC4 as being
> > > up-to-date which were not on the mirror at the time I registered it,
> > > so I must be seeing someone else's mirror.
> > 
> > http://mirror.atrpms.net/fedoracore/
> > contains FC1-4, yes?  Well, not ISOs, but everything else.  That's
> > fine, the ISO directories don't appear on your list.
> > 
> > /me is confused.  What's wrong?
> 
> Oh, please forget about it, I'm confused, not you ... :)
> (FWIW I mixed up dl.atrpms.net and mirror.atrpms.net)
> 
> I'm going to really remove the content, now, should I expect the
> Category pages to catch up within 6h?

Yes.
 
> BTW is there a special User-Agent: you use for crawling?

I don't think so, I'm using httplib directly.  I'll look into adding one.


> Thanks and sorry for the false alarm.

np at all.  Thanks for testing!
-Matt


-- 
Matt Domsch
Software Architect
Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
Linux on Dell mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

Re: more mirrormanager testing

[Axel Thimm]

On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 11:06:42AM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 04:28:58PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 09:08:17AM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > > With that in place, the http/ftp crawler will come by every 6 hours or
> > > so looking at what you're carrying.  Each Category page in the web UI
> > > will show the list of directories you have it thinks are up-to-date.
> > 
> > I checked the ones for ATrpms and they list FC1-FC4 as being
> > up-to-date which were not on the mirror at the time I registered it,
> > so I must be seeing someone else's mirror.
> 
> http://mirror.atrpms.net/fedoracore/
> contains FC1-4, yes?  Well, not ISOs, but everything else.  That's
> fine, the ISO directories don't appear on your list.
> 
> /me is confused.  What's wrong?

Oh, please forget about it, I'm confused, not you ... :)
(FWIW I mixed up dl.atrpms.net and mirror.atrpms.net)

I'm going to really remove the content, now, should I expect the
Category pages to catch up within 6h?

BTW is there a special User-Agent: you use for crawling?

Thanks and sorry for the false alarm.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net


pgpHNtBjm5eMv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

Re: more mirrormanager testing

[Matt Domsch]

On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 04:28:58PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 09:08:17AM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > With that in place, the http/ftp crawler will come by every 6 hours or
> > so looking at what you're carrying.  Each Category page in the web UI
> > will show the list of directories you have it thinks are up-to-date.
> 
> I checked the ones for ATrpms and they list FC1-FC4 as being
> up-to-date which were not on the mirror at the time I registered it,
> so I must be seeing someone else's mirror.

http://mirror.atrpms.net/fedoracore/
contains FC1-4, yes?  Well, not ISOs, but everything else.  That's
fine, the ISO directories don't appear on your list.

/me is confused.  What's wrong?

Thanks,
Matt

-- 
Matt Domsch
Software Architect
Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
Linux on Dell mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

Re: more mirrormanager testing

[Axel Thimm]

Hi,

On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 09:08:17AM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> With that in place, the http/ftp crawler will come by every 6 hours or
> so looking at what you're carrying.  Each Category page in the web UI
> will show the list of directories you have it thinks are up-to-date.

I checked the ones for ATrpms and they list FC1-FC4 as being
up-to-date which were not on the mirror at the time I registered it,
so I must be seeing someone else's mirror.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net


pgpsQXUVVvtWc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list