Re: rpm-4.6.x & friends for RHEL5 (was: hosts for rawhide build chroots - different rpm versions?)

2009-10-05 Thread Axel Thimm
Hi,

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:14:24PM +0300, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > >> we are running a version of rpm 4.6.0 on rhel5.  This is only
> > >> so mock can populate chroots with rpms with stronger hashes
> > >> rhel5's rpm doesnt support.  All srpm creation now takes place
> > >> in chroots so features of the target rpm are always available.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the explanation, Dennis. Can I get these tailored rpm rpms
> > > from somewhere? I just tried rebuilding rpm from rawhide on RHEL5 and
> > > the dependencies look endless.

> http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/builder-rpms/

This worked for quite a while including Bill's update to rpm, but
since the util-linux-ng update in F11 a couple of weeks ago yum/rpm on
the RHEL5 host fails on util-linux-ng with

[...]
Running Transaction
error: util-linux-ng-2.14.2-11.fc11: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 signature:
BAD, key ID d22e77f2
Warning: scriptlet or other non-fatal errors occurred during
transaction.
[...]

Other packages (even built later than util-linux-ng-2.14.2-11.fc11)
install fine, the keys are installed, and I even tried with
--nogpgcheck.

Shouldn't --nogpgcheck avoid the test in the first place, and why does
it fail (only) on util-linux-ng?
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net


pgpNow64KJuoM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: rpm-4.6.x & friends for RHEL5 (was: hosts for rawhide build chroots - different rpm versions?)

2009-04-14 Thread Axel Thimm
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 01:15:21PM -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Axel Thimm  wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:53:09AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> >>
> >> we are running a version of rpm 4.6.0 on rhel5.  This is only so mock can
> >> populate chroots with rpms with stronger hashes rhel5's rpm doesnt support.
> >> All srpm creation now takes place in chroots so features of the target rpm 
> >> are
> >> always available.
> >
> > Thanks for the explanation, Dennis. Can I get these tailored rpm rpms
> > from somewhere? I just tried rebuilding rpm from rawhide on RHEL5 and
> > the dependencies look endless.
> 
> http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/
> 

Thanks, I guess it's
http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/builder-rpms/

It's missing popt builds, but these were easy to rebuild from
Fedora. I just metion it in case a) I'm pulling the wrong bits, b)
someone else wants to use RHEL5 hosts with F11 roots.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net


pgpWpMWGV5epm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: rpm-4.6.x & friends for RHEL5 (was: hosts for rawhide build chroots - different rpm versions?)

2009-04-14 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Axel Thimm  wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:53:09AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>
>> we are running a version of rpm 4.6.0 on rhel5.  This is only so mock can
>> populate chroots with rpms with stronger hashes rhel5's rpm doesnt support.
>> All srpm creation now takes place in chroots so features of the target rpm 
>> are
>> always available.
>
> Thanks for the explanation, Dennis. Can I get these tailored rpm rpms
> from somewhere? I just tried rebuilding rpm from rawhide on RHEL5 and
> the dependencies look endless.

http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/

-- 
Jeff Ollie

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


rpm-4.6.x & friends for RHEL5 (was: hosts for rawhide build chroots - different rpm versions?)

2009-04-14 Thread Axel Thimm
Hi,

On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:53:09AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Sunday 22 March 2009 05:02:41 am Axel Thimm wrote:
> > AFAIK the build hosts are RHEL5 (or maybe F10 by now?). At any rate
> > the rpm used in rawhide is quite different than the ones from the
> > hosts, how has this been solved in the build hosts? Has the hosting OS
> > upgraded its rpm to be compatible to all hosted chroots? Or is the rpm
> > within the chroot used?
> >
> > I'm asking in a double context: First I'd like to understand if smart
> > can properly handle chroots of rawhide/F11 on F10/RHEL5 hosts. Anders
> > Björklund (in the Cc, please keep him there on replies) has put a
> > great deal of effort to have smart working on F10 and F11, and a smart
> > version for managing F11 and later chroots on F10 or earlier would be
> > great.
> >
> > And second I'd like to know how to setup a build environment for F11
> > for getting some ATrpms packages out.
> 
> 
> we are running a version of rpm 4.6.0 on rhel5.  This is only so mock can 
> populate chroots with rpms with stronger hashes rhel5's rpm doesnt support.  
> All srpm creation now takes place in chroots so features of the target rpm 
> are 
> always available. 
> 
> rpm in F-10 updates is compatible with the new rpm features. but rpm from F-9 
> and RHEL4 and 5 can not handle the new rpm at all. you cannot make chroots on 
> them with rawhide rpms.
> 
> 
> you could use koji on F-10/rawhide  or F-9/RHEL5 by replacing the hosts rpm 
> to 
> build your packages.

Thanks for the explanation, Dennis. Can I get these tailored rpm rpms
from somewhere? I just tried rebuilding rpm from rawhide on RHEL5 and
the dependencies look endless.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net


pgp7EVD9Gntys.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: hosts for rawhide build chroots - different rpm versions?

2009-03-22 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Sunday 22 March 2009 05:02:41 am Axel Thimm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> AFAIK the build hosts are RHEL5 (or maybe F10 by now?). At any rate
> the rpm used in rawhide is quite different than the ones from the
> hosts, how has this been solved in the build hosts? Has the hosting OS
> upgraded its rpm to be compatible to all hosted chroots? Or is the rpm
> within the chroot used?
>
> I'm asking in a double context: First I'd like to understand if smart
> can properly handle chroots of rawhide/F11 on F10/RHEL5 hosts. Anders
> Björklund (in the Cc, please keep him there on replies) has put a
> great deal of effort to have smart working on F10 and F11, and a smart
> version for managing F11 and later chroots on F10 or earlier would be
> great.
>
> And second I'd like to know how to setup a build environment for F11
> for getting some ATrpms packages out.


we are running a version of rpm 4.6.0 on rhel5.  This is only so mock can 
populate chroots with rpms with stronger hashes rhel5's rpm doesnt support.  
All srpm creation now takes place in chroots so features of the target rpm are 
always available. 

rpm in F-10 updates is compatible with the new rpm features. but rpm from F-9 
and RHEL4 and 5 can not handle the new rpm at all. you cannot make chroots on 
them with rawhide rpms.


you could use koji on F-10/rawhide  or F-9/RHEL5 by replacing the hosts rpm to 
build your packages.

Dennis

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


hosts for rawhide build chroots - different rpm versions?

2009-03-22 Thread Axel Thimm
Hi,

AFAIK the build hosts are RHEL5 (or maybe F10 by now?). At any rate
the rpm used in rawhide is quite different than the ones from the
hosts, how has this been solved in the build hosts? Has the hosting OS
upgraded its rpm to be compatible to all hosted chroots? Or is the rpm
within the chroot used?

I'm asking in a double context: First I'd like to understand if smart
can properly handle chroots of rawhide/F11 on F10/RHEL5 hosts. Anders
Björklund (in the Cc, please keep him there on replies) has put a
great deal of effort to have smart working on F10 and F11, and a smart
version for managing F11 and later chroots on F10 or earlier would be
great.

And second I'd like to know how to setup a build environment for F11
for getting some ATrpms packages out.

Thanks!
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net


pgpcy4KlxzMtE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list