new utrace patch breaks ia64
Roland, The latest incarnation of the utrace patch breaks the kernel build on ia64: arch/ia64/kernel/process.c: In function 'do_notify_resume_user': arch/ia64/kernel/process.c:189: error: implicit declaration of function 'tracehook_notify_resume' Full build log can be found here: http://ia64.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=94725name=build.log - Doug ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: new utrace patch breaks ia64
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 13:16 -0400, Doug Chapman wrote: Roland, The latest incarnation of the utrace patch breaks the kernel build on ia64: arch/ia64/kernel/process.c: In function 'do_notify_resume_user': arch/ia64/kernel/process.c:189: error: implicit declaration of function 'tracehook_notify_resume' Full build log can be found here: http://ia64.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=94725name=build.log - Doug Roland, Simple patch, just missing an #include it appears. Can you add this to your utrace patches? thanks, - Doug diff -up linux-2.6.26.ia64/arch/ia64/kernel/process.c.broken linux-2.6.26.ia64/arch/ia64/kernel/process.c --- linux-2.6.26.ia64/arch/ia64/kernel/process.c.broken 2008-07-14 13:20:43.0 -0400 +++ linux-2.6.26.ia64/arch/ia64/kernel/process.c2008-07-14 13:21:01.0 -0400 @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ #include linux/slab.h #include linux/stddef.h #include linux/thread_info.h +#include linux/tracehook.h #include linux/unistd.h #include linux/efi.h #include linux/interrupt.h ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Free dating in Texas
= jasmine123 28 years old seeking men, 29-64 New York, New York USA Online now! http://aarcabusej.nightmail.ru/ -- __ Delite your email from my list It can take about 2-3 days If you get mail agian please send once more: succeedssuuuq [EMAIL PROTECTED] gmail [dot] com first153241 ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
kernel-vanilla-2.6.26-137.fc10
BTW, see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/roland/task_714174/ for a kernel-vanilla build I did of 2.6.26. This gives a baseline for regression testing any problems to see if they are caused by some Fedora patches (e.g. utrace) or are also upstream. I think koji scratch only stays around for a couple of days. Maybe there is a better place to put these. Was there ever a plan to put kernel-vanilla rpms up for public consumption on a regular basis? Thanks, Roland ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: kernel-vanilla-2.6.26-137.fc10
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 01:03:39PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: BTW, see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/roland/task_714174/ for a kernel-vanilla build I did of 2.6.26. This gives a baseline for regression testing any problems to see if they are caused by some Fedora patches (e.g. utrace) or are also upstream. I think koji scratch only stays around for a couple of days. Maybe there is a better place to put these. put them on roland.fedoraproject.org ? Was there ever a plan to put kernel-vanilla rpms up for public consumption on a regular basis? There was. The question largely came down to 'where do we host them?'. The best answer right now does seem to be $personal.fedoraproject.org I think it's worth doing this on a semi-regular basis. Probably not for every -git, but at least for every -rc and point release. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: kernel-vanilla-2.6.26-137.fc10
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 16:12 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 01:03:39PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: BTW, see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/roland/task_714174/ for a kernel-vanilla build I did of 2.6.26. This gives a baseline for regression testing any problems to see if they are caused by some Fedora patches (e.g. utrace) or are also upstream. I think koji scratch only stays around for a couple of days. Maybe there is a better place to put these. put them on roland.fedoraproject.org ? Was there ever a plan to put kernel-vanilla rpms up for public consumption on a regular basis? There was. The question largely came down to 'where do we host them?'. The best answer right now does seem to be $personal.fedoraproject.org I think it's worth doing this on a semi-regular basis. Probably not for every -git, but at least for every -rc and point release. I'd be more than happy to host them on my fedorapeople page. I don't have anything else there. josh ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: kernel-vanilla-2.6.26-137.fc10
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 04:28:50PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 16:12 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 01:03:39PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: BTW, see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/roland/task_714174/ for a kernel-vanilla build I did of 2.6.26. This gives a baseline for regression testing any problems to see if they are caused by some Fedora patches (e.g. utrace) or are also upstream. I think koji scratch only stays around for a couple of days. Maybe there is a better place to put these. put them on roland.fedoraproject.org ? Was there ever a plan to put kernel-vanilla rpms up for public consumption on a regular basis? There was. The question largely came down to 'where do we host them?'. The best answer right now does seem to be $personal.fedoraproject.org I think it's worth doing this on a semi-regular basis. Probably not for every -git, but at least for every -rc and point release. I'd be more than happy to host them on my fedorapeople page. I don't have anything else there. I really don't mind who does it, and takes care of the building/uploading of them (it can mostly be automated anyway). I've not got around to doing it myself due to well, everything else. It's probably best if someone other than the usual suspects (me, kyle, chuck) did it anyway, so we can keep doing what we do normally.. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
