Re: Compiling kernel-2.6.30.5-43.fc11.src.rpm
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 22:16 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: Bugs (like your radeon issue) should be reported in bugzilla. The radeon issue I'm familiar with was related to running a (locally rebuild) Rawhide kernel rpm on a Fedora 11 installation. That caused some problems with the Fedora 11 X Server radeon stuff. I don't think bugzilla will be of much use for an issue like that. Paul Bolle ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: Building kernel-2.6.31-0.190 rawhide in F11
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 22:08 -0700, Markus Kesaromous wrote: Build, instal and boot went fine, except radeon driver does not work. Radeon works just fine in 2.6.29.6-217.2.16.fc11.i586, but not in 2.6.31-0.190... That could be some sort of mismatch between that Rawhide kernel and the F11 X Server you seem to use (Rawhide currently uses X.Org X Server 1.6.99.1). I'd try one of the following kernel command line options: nomodeset radeon.modeset=0 Those could be used to work around some issues with Rawhide's Radeon kernel driver (or Rawhide's Radeon X module, or whatever) a few weeks back. (It' s just a guess though. I hardly know anything about the way the kernel and the X Server interact.) Paul Bolle ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: rpmbuild warning message
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 22:21 -0700, Markus Kesaromous wrote: In building 2.6.29..6-217.2.8.fc11 from source rpm for i586 architecture on a machine with amd athlon64 cpu, I get this warning message: arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c:63:7: warning: __x86_64__ is not defined See commit 2ad76643ff58bb8841f391ea8327c14abe273ea3 (x86: Fix warning in pvclock.c) for the identical fix in the upstream kernel (i.e. Linus' git tree). Paul Bolle ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
RE: rpmbuild warning message
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 08:24 -0700, Markus Kesaromous wrote: There are numerous other warnings which seem to be inconsequential as far as compilation goes. I was wondering if there is a concerted effort to thoroughly lint the kernel and get rid of all those warnings. The kernel build system is very quiet by default. As far as I know it is that quiet (among other things) to make warnings stand out. Valid fixes for warnings (as the commit I pointed you to) should be accepted without too much trouble. Paul Bolle ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
