Re: atop?
Axel Thimm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: Would it make sense to add these patches to Fedora's kernel? http://www.atcomputing.nl/Tools/atop This could help in the area of extending laptop battery life by detecting unneccessary disk access. The first step is to have some disk I/O to process mapping. These patches: a) aren't upstream b) change the format of /proc/stat c) change process accounting in an incompatible way So... no. Bill ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: atop?
Axel Thimm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: These patches: a) aren't upstream b) change the format of /proc/stat c) change process accounting in an incompatible way So... no. OK, fair enough (I wasn't aware of b) and c)). Any other way then to achive the stated goals? I haven't tried, but blktrace? Bill ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: atop?
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 03:47:34PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Axel Thimm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: These patches: a) aren't upstream b) change the format of /proc/stat c) change process accounting in an incompatible way So... no. OK, fair enough (I wasn't aware of b) and c)). Any other way then to achive the stated goals? I haven't tried, but blktrace? Very nice! One does get process - I/O bandwidth. No filesystem info, though, but I shouldn't be greedy ;) If I find a minute I'll submit a package for this. Thanks for pushing me to the right track! -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpUy2S28sDR9.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
