Re: Legacy wiki -- statement?

[Matthew Miller]

On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 05:56:42PM -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
> >>We can't and shouldn't announce anything on core/extra's behalf, we
> >>just need to say that the current model is being reorganized and while
> >>doing so distributions X, Y, Z have effectively fallen out of
> >>maintenance.
> >where X=2, Y=3, and Z=4. :)
> Hmm. Do you mean FC2, FC3, and FC4? FC2 has been out of support
> for quite some time, and for other reasons.

Well, I had three values to work with. :)

-- 
Matthew Miller   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
Boston University Linux  -->  

--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

Re: Legacy wiki -- statement?

[Jesse Keating]

On Monday 11 December 2006 16:16, Eric Rostetter wrote:
> That is what I was proposing.  But it seems to have been met by
> silence.  And I still have no idea myself what is going on.

I was hoping that David would make a comment/decision.  Failing that, yes, we 
can shut things down.  Point to the proposals for the longer life span, 
etc...

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora


pgpowgdhO4XbB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

Re: Legacy wiki -- statement?

[Mike McCarty]

Matthew Miller wrote:

On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 10:40:30PM +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:


We can't and shouldn't announce anything on core/extra's behalf, we
just need to say that the current model is being reorganized and while
doing so distributions X, Y, Z have effectively fallen out of
maintenance.



where X=2, Y=3, and Z=4. :)



Hmm. Do you mean FC2, FC3, and FC4? FC2 has been out of support
for quite some time, and for other reasons.

Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!

--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

Re: Legacy wiki -- statement?

[Jeff Sheltren]

On Dec 11, 2006, at 5:16 PM, Eric Rostetter wrote:


Quoting Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:


The longer we wait the more it will look like a failure. Better be
active and tell the users that we're working on something than  
letting

them find out by themselves by being bitten.


That is what I was proposing.  But it seems to have been met by
silence.  And I still have no idea myself what is going on.


We can't and shouldn't announce anything on core/extra's behalf, we
just need to say that the current model is being reorganized and  
while

doing so distributions X, Y, Z have effectively fallen out of
maintenance.
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net


Sounds good.  Someone who has edit rights should post something on the
wiki, and others can then edit it or correct it or what ever...

Due to the silence, I guess someone should just take this one and
get the ball rolling...

If _no one_ will step up to do it, I can do it by request, but since
I have little actual understanding of what people want or where the
project is allegedly going, I'm probably not the best person to do it.



I agree, and I've changed the Legacy page on the wiki.  If someone  
can think of a better way to put it, please let me know.


-Jeff

--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

Re: Legacy wiki -- statement?

[Eric Rostetter]

Quoting Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:


The longer we wait the more it will look like a failure. Better be
active and tell the users that we're working on something than letting
them find out by themselves by being bitten.


That is what I was proposing.  But it seems to have been met by
silence.  And I still have no idea myself what is going on.


We can't and shouldn't announce anything on core/extra's behalf, we
just need to say that the current model is being reorganized and while
doing so distributions X, Y, Z have effectively fallen out of
maintenance.
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net


Sounds good.  Someone who has edit rights should post something on the
wiki, and others can then edit it or correct it or what ever...

Due to the silence, I guess someone should just take this one and
get the ball rolling...

If _no one_ will step up to do it, I can do it by request, but since
I have little actual understanding of what people want or where the
project is allegedly going, I'm probably not the best person to do it.

--
Eric Rostetter
The Department of Physics
The University of Texas at Austin

Go Longhorns!

--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list