Re: [Fedora-legal-list] shipping icons possibly trademarked
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 01:31 +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: I would appreciate it if you would check if these icons can be included in Fedora srpm and installed with binary rpms. If not I can simply remove these icons from cairo-dock tarball. These icons need to be removed. ~spot ___ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
Re: [Fedora-legal-list] mldonkey's src/utils/lib/md4.h licence
DM == Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net writes: DM Am I mistaken? Is this licence acceptable for Fedora? The info at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#What_about_the_RSA_license_on_their_MD5_implementation.3F_Isn.27t_that_GPL-incompatible.3F seems to be on-point here. - J ___ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
Re: [Fedora-legal-list] shipping icons possibly trademarked
Tom spot Callaway wrote, at 01/15/2009 04:34 AM +9:00: On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 01:31 +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: I would appreciate it if you would check if these icons can be included in Fedora srpm and installed with binary rpms. If not I can simply remove these icons from cairo-dock tarball. These icons need to be removed. ~spot Done on the latest Fedora CVS, will be pushed on rawhide after next. Thank you. Mamoru ___ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
