Re: Choosing the 'right' icon for an application

2008-07-15 Thread Nicu Buculei

Robin Norwood wrote:

So I've been looking at importing the icons for applications for the
Fedora Applications web site [1].  We'd like to show an icon next to a
given application, preferably the one the user would see in the menus
after installing said app.  This is, of course, complicated.  I can
currently look for icons inside each rpm in Fedora, specifically the
rpm providing the application we're interested in, and the various
*-icon-theme rpms.  My current thinking is, for each application:

o Get the icon name from the application's .desktop file.


This seems sane


o Look in /usr/share/icons for icons matching that name from the
various default Fedora themes.

o Pick an appropriately-sized icon png (probably 48x48).
  - We could also store svg instead of png.


I don't think there is a need to store the SVG, there is no 
straightforward way to embed in in a web page (and have it rendered 
correctly by all browsers).



o Create a map that looks something like this:
  OS - Application - Theme - icon

  With a 'generic' theme for icons provided by the application.

o Save the above map and icon data in the web application's database.

o When picking an icon to show the user, pick the one from their
currently-selected theme and OS (if we know it), falling back to an icon
from the Fedora or 'generic' theme.


I am curious to identify which icon theme is the user using. The browser 
does not know this info, the only way I can imagine it working is to 
have smolt reporting the theme and link data from smolt with amber. I 
don't think you want to go this route (complicated, privacy issues, 
smolt is off by default)



Does this sound sane?  I don't know enough about how icons work to know
if I've missed something.


I want to add that we are not sure at this time which icon set will be 
used in F10 as default, we try to have Echo but we may end staying one 
more cycle with Mist (but this should be easy to solve, both themes are 
using the same naming structure).



[1] https://fedorahosted.org/amber/


--
nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com
Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/
Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org
my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro

___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Theme propose reloaded .

2008-07-15 Thread RazGriz
Just the final version of my theme proposal concept. =]

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Image:Simmetricalreloaded.png

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/F10Themes/simmetricalfreedom
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


R: Re: F10 artwork schedule - time to close proposals?

2008-07-15 Thread Samuele Storari
+1
I think it's good go to the next step and turn all the proposal in something 
real.

Samuele

- Messaggio originale -
Da: RazGriz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: Discussions about the artwork included with Fedora, including icons, 
themes, and wallpapers. fedora-art-list@redhat.com
Inviato: Martedì, 15 luglio 2008 7:09:43 GMT +01:00 
Amsterdam/Berlino/Berna/Roma/Stoccolma/Vienna
Oggetto: Re: F10 artwork schedule - time to close proposals?


+1. 


On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Máirín Duffy  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote: 



Ian Weller wrote: 


On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Máirín Duffy wrote: 



We've an overwhelming number of proposals for F10 now. Should we close 
new proposals for F10 so we don't have our focus spread across too many 
ideas? 

Give everyone another week. Some people may be working on proposals 
right now. 

Good idea! Is everyone okay with closing it on July 21st? 






Also, we should probably go through the proposals missing the 
requirements and remind the proposers to fully fill them out or pull them. 

A matrix on the wiki page might help. It also might help to have a wiki 
page with the requirements for each stage, with examples from previous 
releases' successful themes. Maybe I can talk with you tomorrow about 
what exactly the requirements are and I can compile the pages... 

We do have a page with the requirements; they have been the same since F7: 

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/F10Themes#How_to_Play 

Basically: 
- have a good *concept* 
- create a wiki page with: 
- a theme name 
- initial sketches (at least one is what we usually say, and they can be 
examples or references to other artwork) 
- an explanation of the concept and how it relates to Fedora 
- the proposer must have a signed CLA 

Having examples of good ones from previous versions of Fedora would be awesome! 
:) 




~m 

___ 
Fedora-art-list mailing list 
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com 
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list 



-- 
RazGriz 
The Solo_-Wing. 
Diretor de Arte 
GNU-LIA--= www.gnu-lia.org 
2 Tons Comunicação 
Revista Fedora Brasil 
Portal O-Gimp 
-=-=:Quem constrói a realidade é você. 
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


-- 
Samuele Storari
Art Director
Byte-Code srl
mobile: +39 347 50 798 32
office: +39 02 9840047
http://www.byte-code.com

___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: Theme propose reloaded .

2008-07-15 Thread Nicu Buculei

RazGriz wrote:


Just the final version of my theme proposal concept. =]

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Image:Simmetricalreloaded.png


While I am impressed by the technical al achievement, this may be a bit 
to much symmetry for an effective wallpaper. Looking at it for more than 
a few seconds I start to feel a bit dizzy (but it may also be because it 
is morning here, I am partly asleep, do not use to drink coffee and 
worked myself with some photo effects)


--
nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com
Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/
Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org
my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro

___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: Theme propose reloaded .

2008-07-15 Thread RazGriz
Hehe, the sun just woke up here too, it is just the concept , lets wait th
dead line first round , and if my theme get a chance to proceed to the
second round i'll see a wallpaper of it =].

On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 4:55 AM, Nicu Buculei [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 RazGriz wrote:


 Just the final version of my theme proposal concept. =]

 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Image:Simmetricalreloaded.png


 While I am impressed by the technical al achievement, this may be a bit to
 much symmetry for an effective wallpaper. Looking at it for more than a few
 seconds I start to feel a bit dizzy (but it may also be because it is
 morning here, I am partly asleep, do not use to drink coffee and worked
 myself with some photo effects)

 --
 nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com
 Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/
 Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org
 my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro

 ___
 Fedora-art-list mailing list
 Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
 http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list




-- 
RazGriz
The Solo_-Wing.
Diretor de Arte
GNU-LIA--=www.gnu-lia.org
2 Tons Comunicação
Revista Fedora Brasil
Portal O-Gimp
-=-=:Quem constrói a realidade é você.
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: F10 theme: Spectrum

2008-07-15 Thread Pavel Shevchuk
In KDE4 it's not hard at all =)

http://stalwart.fedorapeople.org/fedorapeople_kde4/1.png
http://stalwart.fedorapeople.org/fedorapeople_kde4/2.png
(these two files uploaded using drag'n'drop in dolphin)

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Mike Langlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Martin Sourada wrote:

 On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 12:49 -0400, Mike Langlie wrote:


 How do I upload something directly to my people account?
 Having a hard time figuring that out.

 Mike



 It's actually pretty easy and you can do it even using nautilus, but I
 find more convenient to use mc. Here are the steps:

  * open terminal
  * open mc in terminal
  * in one panel navigate to the folder you have the file in
  * switch to the other panel (hit tab)
  * hit F9, enter the menu, and select shell link
  * enter the machine name in format:
   your-fas-account-name.fedorapeople.org
   in my case it's mso.fedorapeople.org
  * hit OK. You'll be probably asked for a password to your ssh key -
   watch the command line to see what's happening
  * once you're in, navigate into
   /home/fedora/your-fas-account-name/public_html
   in my case it's /home/fedora/mso/public_html
  * switch back to the first panel
  * select the file you want to upload (either by hitting insert, or
   highlighting it)
  * hit F5 to copy, you can leave the form as is and hit OK
  * watch the progress in the command line
  * after you're done, close mc and the terminal

 Martin
  

 ___
 Fedora-art-list mailing list
 Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
 http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


 Thanks Martin. Is there a way to do it without using Terminal?
 (For us lowly Mac users who aren't schooled in such things...)

 Mike

 ___
 Fedora-art-list mailing list
 Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
 http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list




-- 
http://scwlab.com

___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: F10 artwork schedule - time to close proposals?

2008-07-15 Thread Nicu Buculei

Máirín Duffy wrote:

Ian Weller wrote:

On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Máirín Duffy wrote:

We've an overwhelming number of proposals for F10 now. Should we close
new proposals for F10 so we don't have our focus spread across too many
ideas?


Give everyone another week. Some people may be working on proposals
right now.


Good idea! Is everyone okay with closing it on July 21st?


Fine by me. I uploaded one more concept (steampunk photography) and do 
not have anything major on the horizon.


--
nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com
Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/
Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org
my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro

___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: F10 artwork schedule - time to close proposals?

2008-07-15 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 22:43 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
 Hey folks,
 
 We've an overwhelming number of proposals for F10 now. Should we close 
 new proposals for F10 so we don't have our focus spread across too many 
 ideas?
 
 Also, we should probably go through the proposals missing the 
 requirements and remind the proposers to fully fill them out or pull them.
 
 It would be cool if we could form teams around a core set of proposals 
 and kind of battle it out :)

Layer Tennis, anyone?  http://layertennis.com/index.php 

-- 
Paul W. Frields
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://paul.frields.org/   -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: F10 artwork schedule - time to close proposals?

2008-07-15 Thread Nicu Buculei

Paul W. Frields wrote:

On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 22:43 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:


It would be cool if we could form teams around a core set of proposals 
and kind of battle it out :)


Layer Tennis, anyone?  http://layertennis.com/index.php 


What we could do probably is to get past our egos, find some themes that 
share a number of common point with each other and join them, keeping 
the strong points from each.


Or just having the power to accept our own proposal is not that great 
and start playing with a concept proposed by someone else (maybe 
bringing an idea or two from the abandoned work).


--
nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com
Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/
Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org
my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro

___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-07-15 Thread Michael McCumber
thanks

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sourada
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 4:51 PM
To: Discussions about the artwork included with Fedora, including icons, 
themes, and wallpapers.
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 16:40 -0400, Michael McCumber wrote:
 To introduce myself I am a very young programmer but I have had
 experience among designing in Flash Illustrator photoshop ect…   I
 just want to help and contribute toward the Fedora community and 
 designing artwork such as desktops icons images ect would be my 
 strength.
Hi,

welcome to the team. We usually use open tools here - mainly gimp, inkscape and 
blender. Since you mentioned you'd like to help with icons (among other 
things), which is one of my main interests in Fedora, I'd like you to provide 
some useful links that should help you get started with the icon theme we are 
designing especially for Fedora:

https://fedorahosted.org/echo-icon-theme/
https://fedorahosted.org/echo-icon-theme/wiki/Guidelines
https://fedorahosted.org/echo-icon-theme/wiki/Guidelines/OnTheTablePerspective
http://mso.fedorapeople.org/screencasts/git%20-%2001%20-%20setting-up%
20the%20repository.mkv
https://fedorahosted.org/echo-icon-theme/wiki/WorkingWithGit
https://fedorahosted.org/echo-icon-theme/wiki/AddingNewIconSet
https://fedorahosted.org/echo-icon-theme/wiki/ToDo

You are more than welcome to help either by commenting on these 
pages/screen-casts or creating new icons :-)

Martin


___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Koji CLI Auth problem

2008-07-15 Thread Linul
HI:

I'm using CentOS 5.2 for my Koji Server, but now I have a problem about Koji
CLI auth.

According the wiki document in
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Koji/ServerHowTo , I setup my
Koji-hub、Koji-web、postgresql

, and have a koji web interface.

I also setup my CA Center,and configure the
kojiweb.conf、kojihub.conf、/etc/koji.conf.

But when i execute the koji command with no username and password, the
messages  is:

Error: [('PEM routines', 'PEM_read_bio', 'no start line'), ('SSL routines',
'SSL_CTX_use_PrivateKey_file', 'PEM lib')]

why?

thanks.


/etc/koji.conf:

[koji]

;configuration for koji cli tool

;url of XMLRPC server
;server = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/kojihub
server = http://koji.ossii.com.tw/kojihub

;url of web interface
;weburl = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji
weburl = http://koji.ossii.com.tw/koji

;url of package download site
;pkgurl = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/packages
pkgurl = http://koji.ossii.com.tw/packages

;path to the koji top directory
topdir = /mnt/koji

;configuration for SSL athentication

;client certificate
;cert = ~/.fedora.cert
cert = /etc/kojid/kojiadmin.crt

;certificate of the CA that issued the client certificate
;ca = ~/.fedora-upload-ca.cert
ca = /etc/kojid/kojiadmin.key

;certificate of the CA that issued the HTTP server certificate
;serverca = ~/.fedora-server-ca.cert
serverca = /etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl/ossiikojica.crt


kojihub.conf:

Directory /usr/share/koji-hub
SetHandler mod_python
PythonHandler kojixmlrpc
PythonOption DBName koji
PythonOption DBUser kevin
PythonOption DBHost 127.0.0.1
PythonOption KojiDir /mnt/koji

# Kerberos auth configuration
# PythonOption AuthPrincipal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# PythonOption AuthKeytab /etc/koji.keytab
# PythonOption ProxyPrincipals [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# format string for host principals (%s = hostname)
# PythonOption HostPrincipalFormat compile/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
# end Kerberos auth configuration

# SSL client certificate auth configuration
# the client username is the common name of the subject of their
client certificate
PythonOption DNUsernameComponent CN
# separate multiple DNs with |
# PythonOption ProxyDNs /C=US/ST=Massachusetts/O=Example
Org/OU=Example User/CN=example/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PythonOption ProxyDNs /C=TW/ST=Taiwan/O=OSSII/OU=Koji Hub
Server/CN=OSSII Koji Server CA/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
# end SSL client certificate auth configuration

PythonOption LoginCreatesUser On
PythonOption KojiWebURL http://koji.ossii.com.tw/koji

# The domain name that will be appended to Koji usernames
# when creating email notifications
PythonOption EmailDomain example.com
# PythonOption KojiDebug On
# PythonOption KojiTraceback extended
# sending tracebacks to the client isn't very helpful for debugging
xmlrpc
PythonDebug Off
# autoreload is mostly useless to us (it would only reload
kojixmlrpc.py)
PythonAutoReload Off
/Directory

# uncomment this to enable authentication via SSL client certificates
Location /kojihub
SSLOptions +StdEnvVars
/Location
# these options must be enabled globally (in ssl.conf)
SSLVerifyClient require
SSLVerifyDepth  10

kojiweb.conf:

Alias /koji /usr/share/koji-web/scripts/

Directory /usr/share/koji-web/scripts/
# Config for the publisher handler
SetHandler mod_python
PythonHandler mod_python.publisher

# General settings
PythonDebug On
PythonOption KojiHubURL http://koji.ossii.com.tw/kojihub
PythonOption KojiWebURL http://koji.ossii.com.tw/koji
PythonOption KojiPackagesURL http://koji.ossii.com.tw/koji/packages
PythonOption WebPrincipal koji/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PythonOption WebKeytab /etc/httpd.keytab
PythonOption WebCCache /var/tmp/kojiweb.ccache
PythonOption WebCert /etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl/kojiweb.crt
PythonOption ClientCA /etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl/kojiweb.key
PythonOption KojiHubCA /etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl/ossiikojica.crt
PythonOption LoginTimeout 72
# This must be changed before deployment
PythonOption Secret CHANGE_ME
PythonPath sys.path + ['/usr/share/koji-web/lib']
PythonCleanupHandler kojiweb.handlers::cleanup
PythonAutoReload Off
/Directory
Location /koji/login
SSLOptions +StdEnvVars
/Location
# these options must be enabled globally (in ssl.conf)
SSLVerifyClient require
SSLVerifyDepth  10

Alias /koji-static/ /usr/share/koji-web/static/

Directory /usr/share/koji-web/static/
Options None
AllowOverride None
Order allow,deny
Allow from all
/Directory

ssl.conf

SSLCertificateFile /etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl/kojihub.crt
SSLCertificateKeyFile /etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl/kojihub.key
SSLCACertificateFile /etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl/ossiikojica.crt
SSLVerifyClient require
SSLVerifyDepth  10




-- 

[Bug 436520] [RFE] No support for font-stretch above the vcl level

2008-07-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: [RFE] No support for font-stretch above the vcl level


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436520


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 436520] [RFE] No support for font-stretch above the vcl level

2008-07-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: [RFE] No support for font-stretch above the vcl level


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436520


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute

2008-07-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by 
Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-07-15 07:25 EST ---
khmeros-fonts-5.0-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute

2008-07-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by 
Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-07-15 07:27 EST ---
khmeros-fonts-5.0-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 455050] Review Request: padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script

2008-07-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar 
script


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455050





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-07-15 07:40 EST ---
This is starting to look good!
Some suggested changes:

--- padauk-fonts.spec   2008-07-14 22:01:31.0 +0200
+++ padauk-fonts-nim.spec   2008-07-15 13:24:52.0 +0200
@@ -4,11 +4,10 @@
 
 %define archivename ttf-sil-padauk-2.4
 
-
 Name:%{fontname}-fonts
-Version: 2.4 
+Version: 2.4
 Release: 1%{?dist}
-Summary: Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script 
+Summary: Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script
 
 Group:   User Interface/X
 License: OFL
@@ -21,13 +20,22 @@
 BuildArch: noarch
 
 %description
-Padauk is a Myanmar font covering all currently used characters 
-in the Myanmar block.The font aims to cover all minority language needs. 
-At the moment, these do not extend to stylistic variation needs. 
+Padauk is a Myanmar font covering all currently used characters
+in the Myanmar block.The font aims to cover all minority language needs.
+At the moment, these do not extend to stylistic variation needs.
 The font is a smart font using a Graphite description.
 
+
 %prep
-%setup -q -n font-source 
+%setup -q -c
+for txt in doc/*.txt ; do
+   fold -s $txt  $txt.new
+   sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new
+   touch -r $txt $txt.new
+   mv $txt.new $txt
+done
+
+
 %build
 # Nothing there
 
@@ -36,11 +44,10 @@
 rm -fr %{buildroot}
 
 install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir}
-install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir}
-install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}
-install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf
-
+install -m 0644 -p font-source/*.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir}
 
+install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}
+install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}/65-%{fontname}.conf
 
 
 %clean
@@ -61,17 +68,19 @@
 
 %files
 %defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
+%doc doc/*.txt
+
+%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/65-%{fontname}.conf
+
 %dir %{fontdir}/
 %{fontdir}/*.ttf
 
-%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/61-%{fontname}.conf
 
-%doc ../doc/*.txt
 %changelog
 * Fri Jul 15 2008 Minto Joseph mvaliyav at redhat.com - 2.4-1
 - Changed versioning
-- Added configuration file, 
-- Added more description 
+- Added configuration file,
+- Added more description
 - Added license file
 
 * Fri Jul 11 2008 Minto Joseph mvaliyav at redhat.com - 20080617-1

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 455050] Review Request: padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script

2008-07-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar 
script


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455050


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
   Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]
   ||m)




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-07-15 07:48 EST ---
1. Upstream unfortunately created an archive with no top-dir. While your
solution will sort-of work people (davej) are going to complain you leave stray
files on the hard drive after a build. When upstream forgets the top-dir in an
archive, use the -c %setup option

2. .txt munging to avoid rpmlint complaining of DOS end-of-files (with a fold
added in as a bonus, notice how we try to preserve the orginal timestamp so it's
build-invariant)

3. use 65 not 61 as fontconfig prefix. As noted on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Simple_priority_lists
55-64 space is reserved for fonts with common LGC scripts (and myanmar isn't)

4. minor cosmetic whitespace changes (while I was at it)

5. Lastly, please use Padauk not padauk in your fontconfig rules. As you can
check in nautilus (or another tool) the fonts declare their name with a leading
capital


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 454291] pango-devel.i386 has multilib conflicts with pango-devel.x86_64

2008-07-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: pango-devel.i386 has multilib conflicts with pango-devel.x86_64


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454291


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-07-15 11:10 EST ---
same results can be achieved with later version (1.20.4-1.fc9) and
# yum install pango-devel.{i386,x86_64}

=
 Package Arch   Version  RepositorySize 
=
Installing:
 pango-devel i386   1.20.4-1.fc9 updates   321 k

Transaction Summary
=
Install  1 Package(s) 
Update   0 Package(s) 
Remove   0 Package(s) 


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 454291] pango-devel.i386 has multilib conflicts with pango-devel.x86_64

2008-07-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: pango-devel.i386 has multilib conflicts with pango-devel.x86_64


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454291





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-07-15 11:24 EST ---
Would just like to add that there is a work around for this problem. Download
the RPM (or look in /var/cache/yum/updates/packages after the above yum failure)
and force the install via:
# rpm -i --force pango-devel-1.20.4-1.fc9.i386.rpm
(or whatever version you are trying to install)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 455050] Review Request: padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script

2008-07-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar 
script


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455050


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
   Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]|
   |m)  |




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-07-15 12:44 EST ---
Thank you for the comments. I have made the changes. Please review.. 

Source RPM:
http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/padauk-fonts-2.4-2.fc8.src.rpm

Spec File: http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/padauk-fonts.spec

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 455050] Review Request: padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script

2008-07-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar 
script


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455050


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

OtherBugsDependingO|177841  |
  nThis||
 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-07-15 14:20 EST ---
Since you've done all the requested changes (and I know I can be a difficult
reviewer) I'm going to approve the package and sponsor you. Please don't show me
wrong and continue to take good care of this package.

Your remainning packaging steps are outlined there
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a
don't forget to do them all including the comps and wiki part.

The i18n group will probably want to discuss with you the priority given to this
package in comps.

I hope you'll be interested in packaging more fonts for Fedora in the future.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


rpms/padauk-fonts/devel - New directory

2008-07-15 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Author: kevin

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/padauk-fonts/devel
In directory 
cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsY12007/rpms/padauk-fonts/devel

Log Message:
Directory /cvs/extras/rpms/padauk-fonts/devel added to the repository


___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


rpms/padauk-fonts Makefile,NONE,1.1

2008-07-15 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Author: kevin

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/padauk-fonts
In directory 
cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsY12007/rpms/padauk-fonts

Added Files:
Makefile 
Log Message:
Setup of module padauk-fonts


--- NEW FILE Makefile ---
# Top level Makefile for module padauk-fonts
all : CVS/Root common-update
@cvs update

common-update : common
@cd common  cvs update

common : CVS/Root
@cvs checkout common

CVS/Root :
@echo ERROR: This does not look like a CVS checkout  exit 1

clean :
@find . -type f -name *~ -exec rm -fv {} \;

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


rpms/padauk-fonts/devel .cvsignore, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, NONE, 1.1 sources, NONE, 1.1

2008-07-15 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Author: kevin

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/padauk-fonts/devel
In directory 
cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsY12007/rpms/padauk-fonts/devel

Added Files:
.cvsignore Makefile sources 
Log Message:
Setup of module padauk-fonts


--- NEW FILE .cvsignore ---


--- NEW FILE Makefile ---
# Makefile for source rpm: padauk-fonts
# $Id: Makefile,v 1.1 2008/07/15 22:11:11 kevin Exp $
NAME := padauk-fonts
SPECFILE = $(firstword $(wildcard *.spec))

define find-makefile-common
for d in common ../common ../../common ; do if [ -f $$d/Makefile.common ] ; 
then if [ -f $$d/CVS/Root -a -w $$/Makefile.common ] ; then cd $$d ; cvs -Q 
update ; fi ; echo $$d/Makefile.common ; break ; fi ; done
endef

MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(find-makefile-common))

ifeq ($(MAKEFILE_COMMON),)
# attept a checkout
define checkout-makefile-common
test -f CVS/Root  { cvs -Q -d $$(cat CVS/Root) checkout common  echo 
common/Makefile.common ; } || { echo ERROR: I can't figure out how to 
checkout the 'common' module. ; exit -1 ; } 2
endef

MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(checkout-makefile-common))
endif

include $(MAKEFILE_COMMON)


--- NEW FILE sources ---

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 454128] Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org

2008-07-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-07-15 19:00 EST ---
Corrections made to previous post.
Mock build provided new rpms from new spec file provided by mdomsch:
Spec: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts.spec
Rawhide SRPM:  http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm
FC9 SRPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm
FC8 SRPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-0.1-1.fc8.src.rpm
FC7 SRPM: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-0.1-1.fc7.src.rpm

Rawhide Essays1743 RPM:
http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-essays1743-0.1-1.fc10.noarch.rpm
FC9 Essays1743 RPM:
http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-essays1743-0.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm
FC8 Essays1743 RPM:
http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-essays1743-0.1-1.fc8.noarch.rpm
FC7 Essays1743 RPM:
http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-essays1743-0.1-1.fc7.noarch.rpm

Rawhide Isabella RPM:
http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-isabella-0.1-1.fc10.noarch.rpm
FC9 Isabella RPM:
http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-isabella-0.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm
FC8 Isabella RPM:
http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-isabella-0.1-1.fc8.noarch.rpm
FC7 Isabella RPM:
http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-isabella-0.1-1.fc7.noarch.rpm

Rawhide Rockets RPM:
http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-rockets-0.1-1.fc10.noarch.rpm
FC9 Rockets RPM:
http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-rockets-0.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm
FC8 Rockets RPM:
http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-rockets-0.1-1.fc8.noarch.rpm
FC7 Rockets RPM:
http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-rockets-0.1-1.fc7.noarch.rpm

Rawhide StayPuft RPM:
http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-staypuft-0.1-1.fc10.noarch.rpm
FC9 StayPuft RPM:
http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-staypuft-0.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm
FC8 StayPuft RPM:
http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-staypuft-0.1-1.fc8.noarch.rpm
FC7 StayPuft RPM:
http://www.oslb.net/fonts/thibault-fonts-staypuft-0.1-1.fc7.noarch.rpm

Lyos Gemini Norezel

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


New front: khmeros-fonts

2008-07-15 Thread Michal Nowak
Greetingz list!

New fonts to fedora just arrived:

  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/pending/khmeros-fonts-5.0-3.fc9
  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/pending/khmeros-fonts-5.0-3.fc8


The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent
sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not
necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language.


Thanks a lot for big help, Nicolas!

Michal

___
Fedora-fonts-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list


Re: New front: khmeros-fonts

2008-07-15 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le mardi 15 juillet 2008 à 13:36 +0200, Michal Nowak a écrit :
 Greetingz list!
 
 New fonts to fedora just arrived:
 
   https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/pending/khmeros-fonts-5.0-3.fc9
   https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/pending/khmeros-fonts-5.0-3.fc8
 
 
 The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent
 sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not
 necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language.
 
 
 Thanks a lot for big help, Nicolas!

No problem. I must say it's always a pleasure to work with motivated
packagers, and you had the good taste to select a much needed font set
in the wishlist (not the easiest to package, congratulation). You
probably want to talk with Jens Petersen (juhp) to check if the
Internationalization project does not want some of those fonts on by
default distro-wide BTW.

Please continue packaging fonts!

I'd probably work a little more on the package descriptions, so not two
of them are 100% the same, and add a few fontconfig rules in the lot,
but I'm a perfectionnist (in case you've not noticed yet).

Lastly (and this applies to other new packagers) you can drop all the
blue frames from a font wiki page when the font is done and published.
The blue frames are only there as redaction help, so you don't need to
keep them long-term.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot


signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message	numériquement signée
___
Fedora-fonts-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list


Re: Firmware

2008-07-15 Thread David Woodhouse
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 11:04 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
 Been playing with how I'd make the kernel package deal with the new
 'make firmware_install' stuff. Currently looks something like this.

The patches have now hit Linus' tree, so I've committed the specfile
parts too. As soon as we update to 2.6.26-git1, we'll get a separate
kernel-firmware package which is required by the main kernel binary
package.

 I suspect that (for now) we should make the kernel binary packages
 depend on kernel-firmware?

Done. There are some firmwares which are under GPL, so even the Free
Software or nothing! folks can have _some_ form of kernel-firmware
package. I don't think there's a problem with requiring it.

I'll leave it to Alex to submit for review a kernel-firmware-libre
package which Provides: kernel-firmware and which actually builds the
various firmware files from source :)

 Should the package own the /lib/firmware/ directory?

Not done.

 Ideally we'll want kernel-firmware to be a .noarch.rpm, but we can't get
 that until we start to build it from a separate srpm.

Done.

-- 
dwmw2

___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list


Fedora 9 Installation on i686

2008-07-15 Thread Harry Sandelburn

 Mo 08/14/08
How do you download and install Fedora 9 on an i686 32bit laptop(IBM ThinkPad 
A31)

Installed:
 Hardware:
 Intel Pentium 4M 
  Processor:1.60 GHz   Software: Fedora
 8
 Hard disk: 30 GB   Kernel: 
2.6.25.9-40.fc8
 Memory: so dim 256 MB
 Network: 10/100 Ethernet
i386 direct download install stopped at 35% - reason unknown. When I thought 
the laptop was an i386.
What is the maximum upgrade possible for the IBM ThinkPad A31?




  ___
Fedora-laptop-list mailing list
Fedora-laptop-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-laptop-list


Re: modprobe blacklist

2008-07-15 Thread Tod Merley
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 5:32 AM, john f jarvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 To use gpsbabel with my Garmin Venture Hc gps receiver I must
 first remove the FC9 builtin garmin_gps usb module.
 As su this works: /sbin/rmmod garmin_gps

 My question: How can I use the blacklist feature of modprobe
 to do this automatically? Adding the line: blacklist garmin_gps
 to /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist and/or modprobe.conf.dist
 doesn't work.
Thanks, John Jarvis

 --
 fedora-list mailing list
 fedora-list@redhat.com
 To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Hi John Jarvis!

I would look carefully at the output of lsmod before and after the use
of rmmod.  Likey there is another companion module you need to
blacklist to make this work.  To make one of my wireless modems work
for example I neede to blacklist oronco and oronco_cs to get the job
done.

Good Hunting!

Tod

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: that old GNU/Linux argument

2008-07-15 Thread Andrew Kelly

On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 23:25 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
 On Jul 14, 2008, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

snip for brevity

 Except that what you call Linux software isn't actually for Linux.
 Have you ever heard of Nexenta (GNU/kOpenSolaris), Debian
 GNU/kFreeBSD, and even UnixWare?
 
 If you take *GNU* libc, rebuild it to target a different kernel while
 exporting the same ABI, and voila, you can drop Linux entirely from
 what you call a Linux Operating System, and pretty much all
 applications will still work just the same.  Because they're not
 applications for Linux.  They're applications for GNU libc.  They
 couldn't care less that they're running on top of the kernel Linux.
 For them, the kernel is irrelevant.
 
 Next frequently raised fallacious objections?

Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the sound of a shoe dropping.
[applause]

That was a fabulous exchange, very well stated, very well explained.

Alexandre, very impressed with your ability to avoid vitriolic and
abusive tone. Very impressed.

Andy

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: console-kit: what is /proc/16750/environ

2008-07-15 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Dan Thurman wrote:

 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
 
  On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 08:39 -0700, Dan Thurman wrote:
   This appears consistenently in my /var/log/messages file.
   What IS this process and how do I fix this?
   =
   Jul 11 08:24:53 bronze console-kit-daemon[7946]: WARNING: Couldn't read
   /proc/16750/environ: Error reading file '/proc/16750/environ': No such
   process
 
  # man proc:
 
 /proc/[number]/environ
This file contains the environment for the process.  The
  entries are  separated  by  null  bytes
(’\0’), and there may be a null bytes at the end.  Thus, to
  print out the environment of process
1, you would do:
  [... etc.]
 
  Also:
 
  # ls -l /proc/[number]/exe
 
  # cat /proc/[number]/cmdline
 
 Ok... I wasn't explict enough.  I am getting this message in the system
 logs when I reboot the system.  Why is it even appearing?  Is this normal
 or what?

  i've been seeing the same thing in /var/log/messages:

...
Jul 14 13:35:58 localhost console-kit-daemon[2236]: WARNING: Couldn't
read /proc/30830/environ: Error reading file '/proc/30830/environ': No
such process
...

  so what is console-kit-daemon looking for?  and i see nothing in
bugzilla about this.

rday
--


Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
Have classroom, will lecture.

http://crashcourse.ca  Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

Wireless USB

2008-07-15 Thread Isaac MacFarlane
Hello all. I have a wireless USB adapter based on the Intersil Prism 3 chip
set, but it isn't being recognized by Fedora 9. Is there anything that I
need to do to get it working? I went to the website for hostap and it said
that it was included in the kernel since 2.6.14 so in theory this should be
working. Thanks for any help you can give me.

Isaac MacFarlane
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

Re: Fedora 9: dbus problems with /home on nfs

2008-07-15 Thread David Jansen
Thanks for all your input, see comments below

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 04:44:18PM -0400, Todd Denniston wrote:
 I think we kind of lost the OP's problem.

 John Austin wrote, On 07/14/2008 03:39 PM:
 On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 08:06 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
 On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 13:07 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
 On Monday 14 July 2008 12:47:25 Tom Horsley wrote:
 On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:21:28 +0200

 David Jansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Has anyone else seen this?
 OP summary:[
 /var/log/messages shows
 kernel: dbus-daemon[22141]: segfault at 1c ip
 7fa454a5f2e0 sp 7fff5ca79fa8 error 6 in dbus-daemon[7fa454a31000+4c000]
 after gdm login of users on NFS.
 ]

Yes, that's a good summary of a bad situation :)


 I have noticed some kind of problem with logging in
 via GDM when I use a user with an NFS home, but never
 investigated exactly what the problem was because it
 is usually only by accident that I try it.

 Do you [or the OP] use soft mounts?
 I have seen enormous problems, no matter which OS/version is acting as 
 the server, if the clients are soft mounting home with nfs, and it is 
 worse if the home directories are being automounted.

I didn't use automount for /home, which I want permanently mounted
anyway. But I had the entry in /etc/fstab just withg defaults as mount
option. 'man 5 nfs' seems to indicate that 'hard' is the default. 
I'll add hard,intr anyway and see if that solves the problem.

 Could the OP's problem be that some part of gnome/kde/gdm/kdm is 
 attempting to have dbus look at something in the users home dir which is 
 an auto/soft mounted dir and either not finding the file or getting an IO 
 error causes dbus-daemon to seg fault? [if the answer is yes, then we 
 have narrowed down the problem, and an appropriate bug needs to be put in 
 the system about dbus as being a daemon it should never die with 
 segfault.]

I'm starting to suspect the gvfs system, which tries to mount stuff
under $HOME/.gvfs and I don't see this mount showing up for a user with
$HOME on nfs, only for users with local homes. I could understand that
it may not have sufficient permissions to mount something under a remote
nfs mount, but I would expect an error message; the logs don't seem to
indicate any messages about gvfs.

As for all the other comments about nfs problems: probably true, but it
doesn't explain why Fedora = 8, RHEL, and Solaris all seem to be
perfectly happy with the network and nfs setup. It's certainly a new
problem in fedora 9, or a new feature in Fedora 9 (like gvfs?) triggers
the problem.

Anyway, I have a new set of options to test, to see if that solves
anything. Thanks to everyone who has resonded so far.

David Jansen

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: modprobe blacklist

2008-07-15 Thread Tod Merley
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:05 PM, Tod Merley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 5:32 AM, john f jarvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 To use gpsbabel with my Garmin Venture Hc gps receiver I must
 first remove the FC9 builtin garmin_gps usb module.
 As su this works: /sbin/rmmod garmin_gps

 My question: How can I use the blacklist feature of modprobe
 to do this automatically? Adding the line: blacklist garmin_gps
 to /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist and/or modprobe.conf.dist
 doesn't work.
Thanks, John Jarvis

 --
 fedora-list mailing list
 fedora-list@redhat.com
 To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


 Hi John Jarvis!

 I would look carefully at the output of lsmod before and after the use
 of rmmod.  Likey there is another companion module you need to
 blacklist to make this work.  To make one of my wireless modems work
 for example I neede to blacklist oronco and oronco_cs to get the job
 done.

 Good Hunting!

 Tod


Hi Again John Jarvis!

I just noticed that Ubuntu has the garmin_gps blacklisted normally -
very much as you wrote.

I would check your typing, and the ownership and permissions of your
edited file (hopefully you did a permissions saving copy before you
edited the blacklist file.

I see no reason blacklisting would not work with a proper edit of the
blacklist file.

Good Hunting!

Tod

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Display config

2008-07-15 Thread Antonio M
I am running a laptop from Acer with a intel graphic card (and I am
using intel as driver)
I set the display as LCD 1280x800
In the available resolutions I find only 1024x768, 800x600 and 640x480.
My Xorg file is:

# Xorg configuration created by system-config-display

Section ServerLayout
Identifier single head configuration
Screen  0  Screen0 0 0
InputDeviceKeyboard0 CoreKeyboard
EndSection

Section InputDevice

# keyboard added by rhpxl
Identifier  Keyboard0
Driver  kbd
Option  XkbModel pc105
Option  XkbLayout it
EndSection

Section Monitor
Identifier   Monitor0
ModelNameLCD Panel 1280x800
HorizSync31.5 - 50.0
VertRefresh  56.0 - 65.0
Option  dpms
EndSection

Section Device
Identifier  Videocard0
Driver  intel
EndSection

Section Screen
Identifier Screen0
Device Videocard0
MonitorMonitor0
DefaultDepth 24
SubSection Display
Viewport   0 0
Depth 24
EndSubSection
EndSection

Any way display works fine
I tried aldo to install a second external video, as you can see from
conf file: I am confused, as I understand that you can choose only one
resolution if you connect a second monitor to the available VGA
connector.Is it true???

-- 
Antonio Montagnani
Skype : antoniomontag

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: Program to compress AVI files

2008-07-15 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 It is a screencast, taken with a program to capture the screen as a
 video.

 Which will probably mean that you don't want to drop the resolution
 down, at all.  But, can you drop the frame rate?  Unless the screen cast
 includes live action video, you can probably reduce the frame rate quite
 a lot.

 And what do you want to play the file with?  If it's for others to play,
 you want to use an encoding scheme that they can play back.

 There's all manner of schemes available to you, MPEG (encumbered, but
 widely playable), Ogg Theora (unencumbered, but probably not easily
 viewable if you don't use Linux), and many others.

Thanks, Tim. Since there is no action video, I will reduce the frame
rate, and encoding the screen cast as MPEG, since the other person
uses MS Windows.

Paul

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: Fedora 9 Help creating jigdo file

2008-07-15 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Frank Murphy wrote:

 Having checked man jigdo-file

 I still can get my head around making an updates iso of the F9-Full-DVD.

for what it's worth (and the value has probably decreased measurably
since i first wrote it), i summarized jigdo operation back here:

http://www.crashcourse.ca/wiki/index.php/Getting_Fedora_respins_with_Jigdo

i should probably take the time to update that unless the new official
fedora jigdo page is perfectly acceptable, at which point my page
would be unnecessary.

rday
--


Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
Have classroom, will lecture.

http://crashcourse.ca  Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: microphone not recording (solved)

2008-07-15 Thread Marcelo M. Garcia

Hi.

I don't know what solved the problem, but I included the +20dB bust and 
microphone capture options. And also, after I could see the input 
device option in PulseAudio Volume Control.


Thanks

Marcelo


stan wrote:

Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:

Hi.

I have been trying to get my mic work with Skype and Fedora 9. Skype 
only works when the device in Sound In is set to ICH6,0, not the 
Default Device (default). The test call works, but I cannot hear my 
voice.
Don't know anything about Skype.  Have read there are some problems in 
passing.


The default (System- preferences- Hardware- sound- Sound Capture) 
is set to ALSA. The default mixer is Intel ICH6 (Alsa mixer).


I tried to use the Sound Recorder tool to see if the mic was 
working, but when I try to use, the file is saved, but again no sound.


I think the problem could be in permission to the device. Which one?
/dev/dsp?

I don't think so.  This is for OSS.


Thanks

Marcelo

Bring up alsamixer (either at a command line or via the menu) and hit 
F4.  You should see the capture screen. Turn on the mic and boost and 
give the mic some volume.  That should give you capture sound.




--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: C++ trouble

2008-07-15 Thread Tom Browder
2008/7/14 Arkadiy Butermanov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 If there is anybody who knows C++, please write to me over ICQ
 (449-442-806). I've some troubles with my program. 2-3 questions.

I suggest contacting [EMAIL PROTECTED] with your questions.

-Tom

Tom Browder
Niceville, Florida
USA

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: Program to compress AVI files

2008-07-15 Thread Mark Haney

Paul Smith wrote:

On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




There's all manner of schemes available to you, MPEG (encumbered, but
widely playable), Ogg Theora (unencumbered, but probably not easily
viewable if you don't use Linux), and many others.


Thanks, Tim. Since there is no action video, I will reduce the frame
rate, and encoding the screen cast as MPEG, since the other person
uses MS Windows.

Paul




I've never had a lot of luck dropping the frame rate for something that 
large.  It won't hurt to try.  If this is a screencast have you made 
sure the other person's monitor runs at that resolution?  I'm sure it 
does, but I'd had to have you drop the frame rate and still have the 
image too big for their screen.



--
Libenter homines id quod volunt credunt -- Caius Julius Caesar


Mark Haney
Sr. Systems Administrator
ERC Broadband
(828) 350-2415

Call (866) ERC-7110 for after hours support

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: Cant use Crystal Eye webcam on my Acer Laptop with Fedora 9

2008-07-15 Thread Antonio M
2008/7/11 Rohan Kulkarni [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Antonio M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 2008/7/10 Rohan Kulkarni [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Antonio M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 2008/7/7 Rohan Kulkarni [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Antonio M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 2008/7/7 Antonio M [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 2008/7/6 Ric Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 21:02 +0530, Rohan Kulkarni wrote:
 I installed kernel-devel and the finally installed the linux-uvc
 driver :) but still the webcam is not working :(

 Please don't top post. It screws up the reading of the progression of
 the problem and responses. If you've read other posts, you may note 
 that
 everyone else will respond at the bottom. It's easier on the next guy
 with the same problem who google searches for answers. Thanx, Ric
 --
 
 My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
 There are two Great Sins in the world...
 ..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity.
 Only the former may be overcome. R.I.P. Dad.
 Linux user# 44256 Sign up at: http://counter.li.org/
 http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/oar
 https://oar.dev.java.net/
 Verizon Cell # 336-254-1339
 -

 --
 fedora-list mailing list
 fedora-list@redhat.com
 To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


 I am back to my F9 system, and it is pratically a standard F9 with no
 additional drivers
 My Browser Hardware sees the webcam as SuYin Acer CristallEye webcam
 with uvcvideo driver.
 This is the complete output of my lsmod command

 /sbin/lsmod
 Module  Size  Used by
 bridge 46104  0
 bnep   14592  2
 rfcomm 34576  4
 l2cap  22272  16 bnep,rfcomm
 bluetooth  47588  5 bnep,rfcomm,l2cap
 autofs420356  2
 fuse   41116  5
 sunrpc151412  3
 cpufreq_ondemand   10124  1
 acpi_cpufreq   11532  1
 loop   16772  0
 dm_multipath   18056  0
 ipv6  221660  33
 snd_hda_intel 336928  6
 snd_seq_dummy   6660  0
 arc45760  2
 tg3   103812  0
 snd_seq_oss30364  0
 snd_seq_midi_event  9600  1 snd_seq_oss
 iTCO_wdt   13476  0
 snd_seq48448  5 
 snd_seq_dummy,snd_seq_oss,snd_seq_midi_event
 snd_seq_device 10124  3 snd_seq_dummy,snd_seq_oss,snd_seq
 snd_pcm_oss42496  0
 snd_mixer_oss  16768  2 snd_pcm_oss
 snd_pcm67076  3 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm_oss
 firewire_ohci  21636  0
 snd_timer  21640  2 snd_seq,snd_pcm
 snd_page_alloc 11400  2 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm
 snd_hwdep  10500  1 snd_hda_intel
 i915   85636  2
 video  20368  0
 output  6656  1 video
 i2c_i801   11920  0
 sdhci  16908  0
 uvcvideo   49416  0
 compat_ioctl32  5120  1 uvcvideo
 videodev   30208  1 uvcvideo
 battery14084  0
 firewire_core  34464  1 firewire_ohci
 ac  8068  0
 button 1  0
 acer_wmi   12596  0
 wmi 9640  1 acer_wmi
 ecb 6528  2
 crypto_blkcipher   17924  1 ecb
 ricoh_mmc   7552  0
 iTCO_vendor_support 6916  1 iTCO_wdt
 iwl3945   146140  0
 mac80211  181992  1 iwl3945
 cfg80211   25096  2 iwl3945,mac80211
 snd48312  19
 snd_hda_intel,snd_seq_dummy,snd_seq_oss,snd_seq,snd_seq_device,snd_pcm_oss,snd_mixer_oss,snd_pcm,snd_timer,snd_hwdep
 soundcore   9288  2 snd
 drm   145508  3 i915
 i2c_algo_bit8964  1 i915
 mmc_core   40604  1 sdhci
 i2c_core   20628  4 i915,i2c_i801,drm,i2c_algo_bit
 v4l1_compat15364  2 uvcvideo,videodev
 pcspkr  6272  0
 joydev 12608  0
 crc_itu_t   5760  1 firewire_core
 sg 31028  0
 sr_mod 17064  0
 cdrom  32796  1 sr_mod
 ahci   26760  2
 ata_piix   20100  0
 libata127328  2 ahci,ata_piix
 dm_snapshot18468  0
 dm_zero 5632  0
 dm_mirror  26116  0
 dm_mod 48980  9 
 dm_multipath,dm_snapshot,dm_zero,dm_mirror
 usb_storage76040  2
 sd_mod 25624  6
 scsi_mod  120948  5 sg,sr_mod,libata,usb_storage,sd_mod
 ext3  108552  2
 jbd40852  1 ext3
 mbcache10116  1 ext3
 uhci_hcd   22928  0
 ohci_hcd   22404  0
 ehci_hcd   32268  0

 and I am running my system on 

Re: microphone not recording (solved)

2008-07-15 Thread Tim
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 11:34 +0100, Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
 I don't know what solved the problem, but I included the +20dB bust
 and microphone capture options.

I dunno about you, but all us engineers want to know what the zero dB
reference level is for busts.  Must have been pretty big to lose the
microphone in them...  ;-)

-- 
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: compile graphical ssh - GFTP

2008-07-15 Thread wwp
Hello Aldo,


On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:51:57 -0700 Aldo Foot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 7:48 PM, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 17:36 -0700, Aldo Foot wrote:
  I'm trying to install gtk+-2.13.3 in order to install GFTP (a
  graphical SSH tool).
 
  Just for an exercise?  Unless you want to do that, you don't have to
  compile it.
 
 Yes. Something like that. I want to be able to compile the thing in some
 other system. I thought my F8 box would give me a stable test ground.
 
 GFTP (a graphical *FTP* tool, as the name says, with some
  other protocols, too), already exists as a precompiled package, and can
  simply be yum installed.
 
 I did installed the package yum provides. It works fine. I use port 22
 with SSH2.
 
 So -is there anyone who has played with this GFTP source before?

GFTP is a pretty dead project tome, the author is not responding (at
least, was few years ago) and not reacting to bug reports and patch
submission.
Moreover, it's too easy to make it crash with reproducible and simple
scenarii, thus I recently switched to filezilla, which is much more
mature and stable.


Regards,

-- 
wwp


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

Re: modprobe blacklist

2008-07-15 Thread john f jarvis
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 23:05 -0700, Tod Merley wrote:
 On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 5:32 AM, john f jarvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  To use gpsbabel with my Garmin Venture Hc gps receiver I must
  first remove the FC9 builtin garmin_gps usb module.
  As su this works: /sbin/rmmod garmin_gps
 
  My question: How can I use the blacklist feature of modprobe
  to do this automatically? Adding the line: blacklist garmin_gps
  to /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist and/or modprobe.conf.dist
  doesn't work.
 Thanks, John Jarvis
 
  --
  fedora-list mailing list
  fedora-list@redhat.com
  To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
 
 
 Hi John Jarvis!
 
 I would look carefully at the output of lsmod before and after the use
 of rmmod.  Likey there is another companion module you need to
 blacklist to make this work.  To make one of my wireless modems work
 for example I neede to blacklist oronco and oronco_cs to get the job
 done.
 
 Good Hunting!
 
 Tod
 
Thank you Tod:
lsmod does show two modules are loaded: garmin_gps, usbserial
Adding both of them to /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist doesn't prevent
loading them when the GPS receiver is connected. Where do hotplug
scripts live?
John

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: setroub;eshoot problem

2008-07-15 Thread Steve

 max bianco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I went to start setroubleshoot, Applications-System Tools-SE Linux 
  Troubleshooter and I get this message:
 
  connection failed at /var/run/setroubleshoot/setroubleshoo_tserver. 
  Connection refused
 
  #ls -lZ /var/run/setroubleshoot/setroubleshoot_server
  srw-rw-rw-  root root system_u:object_r:setroubleshoot_var_run_t 
  /var/run/setroubleshoot/setroubleshoot_server
 
 That looks right. Is it F8 or F9?
 SETroubleshoot is usually on, do you remember why you turned it off?

This is F9 and I didn't turm setroubleshoot off - not on purpose.anyway  }-P
If I look in System-Administration-Services at setroubleshootd, it says that 
it is enabled but the status is unknown

Steve.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


F9 and gnupg2.0.9

2008-07-15 Thread Sieranski, Greg

I am trying to make gnupg2.0.9 but I am running into the following error:

gcc-g -O2 -Wall -Wno-pointer-sign -Wpointer-arith   -o gpg2 gpg.o 
server.o build-packet.o compress.o  free-packet.o getkey.o keydb.o 
keyring.o seskey.o kbnode.o mainproc.o armor.o mdfilter.o textfilter.o 
progress.o misc.o openfile.o keyid.o parse-packet.o cpr.o plaintext.o 
sig-check.o keylist.o pkglue.o pkclist.o skclist.o pubkey-enc.o 
passphrase.o seckey-cert.o encr-data.o cipher.o encode.o sign.o verify.o 
revoke.o decrypt.o keyedit.o dearmor.o import.o export.o trustdb.o 
tdbdump.o tdbio.o delkey.o keygen.o helptext.o keyserver.o photoid.o 
call-agent.o card-util.o exec.o ../common/libcommon.a 
../jnlib/libjnlib.a ../gl/libgnu.a  ../common/libgpgrl.a  -lresolv  
-lgcrypt -lgpg-error -lassuan -lgpg-error 
compress.o: In function `do_compress':
/home/gps/Downloads/gnupg-2.0.9/g10/compress.c:107: undefined reference 
to `deflate'

compress.o: In function `init_compress':
/home/gps/Downloads/gnupg-2.0.9/g10/compress.c:80: undefined reference 
to `deflateInit_'

compress.o: In function `init_uncompress':
/home/gps/Downloads/gnupg-2.0.9/g10/compress.c:146: undefined reference 
to `inflateInit_'

compress.o: In function `do_uncompress':
/home/gps/Downloads/gnupg-2.0.9/g10/compress.c:196: undefined reference 
to `inflate'

compress.o: In function `init_uncompress':
/home/gps/Downloads/gnupg-2.0.9/g10/compress.c:146: undefined reference 
to `inflateInit2_'

compress.o: In function `init_compress':
/home/gps/Downloads/gnupg-2.0.9/g10/compress.c:80: undefined reference 
to `deflateInit2_'

compress.o: In function `compress_filter':
/home/gps/Downloads/gnupg-2.0.9/g10/compress.c:264: undefined reference 
to `inflateEnd'
/home/gps/Downloads/gnupg-2.0.9/g10/compress.c:273: undefined reference 
to `deflateEnd'

collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: *** [gpg2] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/gps/Downloads/gnupg-2.0.9/g10'
make: *** [check-recursive] Error 1

Has anyone run into this problem or know what might be the cause of it?

TIA,
Greg Sieranski

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Fedora 9 is not recognised

2008-07-15 Thread ramachandranc1
I received Fedora 9 from a Linux magazine.If I load it in my DVD rom it is not 
recognised.I am not able to proceed further.

Is the media not good or the software?

Ramachandran.C
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

Re: Fedora 9 'git' source kernel ??

2008-07-15 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 16:03:40 -0400,
  William Case [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Now that the bragging is over:  I would really like to find a logical
 way to climb into the functioning of the basic kernel while keeping
 blind allies and logic traps to a minimum.  I would use all suggestions
 and assistance that comes my way in order to get started properly .

A long time ago when I wanted to learn more about vms at a low level I added
some syscalls to the OS. They were simple functions, but things we had
use for. We had source on microfiche along with the generated binary code,
so that we could do binary patches to the OS even though we couldn't rebuild
from source.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: Fedora 9 is not recognised

2008-07-15 Thread Mark Haney

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I received Fedora 9 from a Linux magazine.If I load it in my DVD rom it is not 
recognised.I am not able to proceed further.

Is the media not good or the software?

Ramachandran.C




I'd bet it's the media.  Boot into another OS and check the md5sum on it 
if you can.


Is your system capable of booting the DVD?  Is BIOS set as the first 
boot device?  If not, it won't boot the DVD if there's an OS on the hard 
drive already.



--
Libenter homines id quod volunt credunt -- Caius Julius Caesar


Mark Haney
Sr. Systems Administrator
ERC Broadband
(828) 350-2415

Call (866) ERC-7110 for after hours support

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: Intel Soundmax integrated adapter No Sound

2008-07-15 Thread TNWestTex
Seems that root can see the sound system.  Tried adding user to all groups that 
seemed to apply to sound but still do not get any sound as aregular user.

Robert McBroom


-- 
This is an email sent via The Fedora Community Portal https://fcp.surfsite.org
https://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=277136topic_id=59051forum=10#forumpost277136
If you think, this is spam, please report this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and/or 
blame [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: F9 and gnupg2.0.9

2008-07-15 Thread Rex Dieter
Sieranski, Greg wrote:

 I am trying to make gnupg2.0.9 but I am running into the following error:

gnupg2-2.0.9 is already built and included in the distro, why are you trying
to build it manually?

-- Rex

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?

2008-07-15 Thread Antonio Olivares
--- On Mon, 7/14/08, Kevin Kofler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 From: Kevin Kofler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?
 To: fedora-list@redhat.com
 Date: Monday, July 14, 2008, 3:47 AM
 Antonio Olivares olivares14031 at yahoo.com
 writes:
  A Because Fedora includes Firmware and those guys
 don't.   
 
 Bullsh*t!
Cool :)
 
 BLAG 7 ships:
 * the original Fedora 7 kernels as the default and
 kernel-libre only as an 
 option,
 * the following firmwares: asterisk-firmware,
 atmel-firmware, ivtv-firmware, 
 iwl3945-firmware, iwl4965-firmware, iwlwifi-firmware (old
 version of 
 iwl3945-firmware), ql2100-firmware, ql2200-firmware,
 ql23xx-firmware and 
 ql2400-firmware, all with License: Redistributable,
 no modification permitted
 * zd1211-firmware which claims to be GPLv2, but with no
 source available.
 
 So the only difference between Fedora and BLAG in their
 current state is that 
 BLAG is 2 releases out of date, which also implies there
 are no security 
 updates from Fedora anymore for the software they ship, and
 I wouldn't rely on 
 BLAG for security updates if I were you. For example, there
 is no bind update 
 for the recent DNS security issue, nor any other updates
 since June 13. I 
 consider it completely irresponsible to recommend a
 distribution whose current 
 release has not received ANY security updates for a
 month!
 
 Kevin Kofler
 
 -- 

I do not have BLAG installed, but it sure was good to find out what they 
include :)  Thanks Kevin.  I did not know what they included.  I only wondered 
why it was more freer than Fedora.

Regards,

Antonio 


  

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: Lava Octopus 550 kernel crash

2008-07-15 Thread Seann Clark

Tod Merley wrote:

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 8:48 PM, Seann Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  

All,

This is my first post to the list, but the short of the story is, I got a
lava octopus 550 (since it does work in linux) and I have been having
problems with it, namely it only shows 4/10 total serial ports (two
onboard Intel, 8 on the PCI based Octopus 550) and even after working
across a few of the sites (Lava's how to, a few different setserial sites,
and so forth) and I don't know who to run this past, since it looks like a
problem, either on my side or not. I am including as much information as I
can think of for this.

O/S Fedora 9 x86_64
dual Intel quad core  E5430



Hi Seann Clark,

Serial ports have an interesting way of taking up a lot of time.  Oh well.

I would need to look into this much further, I hope someone with
current experiance can chime in.

Have you recompiled the kernel to allow it to see your additional
ports (see link)? :

  
This is a vanilla Fedora 9 kernel, I haven't done hacking on that 
portion yet, since it came up perfectly without mod on the 
driver/hardware portion of this.

http://www.support.lavalink.com/index.php?id=471

I am suspicious that you have since I see this from your lspci:

0e:01.0 Serial controller: Lava Computer mfg Inc Lava Octo A (rev 03)
(prog-if 02 [16550])
   Subsystem: Lava Computer mfg Inc Lava Octo A
   Flags: medium devsel, IRQ 16
   I/O ports at 4418 [size=8]
   I/O ports at 4410 [size=8]
   I/O ports at 4408 [size=8]
   I/O ports at 4400 [size=8]
   Kernel driver in use: serial

0e:01.1 Serial controller: Lava Computer mfg Inc Lava Octo B (rev 03)
(prog-if 02 [16550])
   Subsystem: Lava Computer mfg Inc Lava Octo B
   Flags: medium devsel, IRQ 16
   I/O ports at 4438 [size=8]
   I/O ports at 4430 [size=8]
   I/O ports at 4428 [size=8]
   I/O ports at 4420 [size=8]
   Kernel driver in use: serial


And I assume you have placed the small script in your
/etc/rc.d/rc.local as suggested in the above article.
  
I was looking over that and did do the script as it suggested, and I 
didn't see anything but the four original ports listed on first boot. 
The problem is, three of the four are showing the Lava, with the same 
port ID's, and one is my onboard. At the least it should be my onboard 
having two ports, and the Lava having the other 2 (up to 8 when I get 
that working right)

If I were you I would look into how to move the interrupt used and
perhaps spread them out a bit (use differant interrupts for each of
the two ports).

Good Hunting!

Tod
  
I would have to do a bit of hunting on the IRQ side to get that sorted, 
including on my hardware so I will see what I can get. Thanks for the 
suggestions so far~


Seann

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: F9 and gnupg2.0.9

2008-07-15 Thread Sieranski, Greg

Rex Dieter wrote:

Sieranski, Greg wrote:

  

I am trying to make gnupg2.0.9 but I am running into the following error:



gnupg2-2.0.9 is already built and included in the distro, why are you trying
to build it manually?

-- Rex

  

Thanks, Did not realize 2.0.9 had been put in yum

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: Fedora 9: dbus problems with /home on nfs

2008-07-15 Thread Todd Denniston

David Jansen wrote, On 07/15/2008 04:32 AM:

Thanks for all your input, see comments below

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 04:44:18PM -0400, Todd Denniston wrote:

I think we kind of lost the OP's problem.

John Austin wrote, On 07/14/2008 03:39 PM:

On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 08:06 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 13:07 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:

On Monday 14 July 2008 12:47:25 Tom Horsley wrote:

On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:21:28 +0200

David Jansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Has anyone else seen this?

OP summary:[
/var/log/messages shows
kernel: dbus-daemon[22141]: segfault at 1c ip
7fa454a5f2e0 sp 7fff5ca79fa8 error 6 in dbus-daemon[7fa454a31000+4c000]
after gdm login of users on NFS.
]


Yes, that's a good summary of a bad situation :)

SNIP

I'm starting to suspect the gvfs system, which tries to mount stuff
under $HOME/.gvfs and I don't see this mount showing up for a user with
$HOME on nfs, only for users with local homes. I could understand that
it may not have sufficient permissions to mount something under a remote
nfs mount, but I would expect an error message; the logs don't seem to
indicate any messages about gvfs.

As for all the other comments about nfs problems: probably true, but it
doesn't explain why Fedora = 8, RHEL, and Solaris all seem to be
perfectly happy with the network and nfs setup. It's certainly a new
problem in fedora 9, or a new feature in Fedora 9 (like gvfs?) triggers
the problem.


I think I did hear about this gvfs (as a default setup) thing being new in F9 
and it was causing folks problems when they tried to backup.


I don't know how, but I would try disabling/killing gvfs for a while and see 
if that fixed it.


grump
Red Hat has explicitly indicated they will not be making _desktop_ distros for 
a while, and Fedora seems to be (probably accidentally) making things hard* 
for those folks who need a desktop distro in a networked environment.


*gvfs, gdm configuration ability getting more difficult ( a)need set a 
particular message, b) need to have no users listed on the screen at login, 
except the one that JUST put in the smart card) and a few other items that 
break with NFS/NIS/LDAP in use that I am forgetting right now.

/grump



Anyway, I have a new set of options to test, to see if that solves
anything. Thanks to everyone who has resonded so far.

David Jansen




--
Todd Denniston
Crane Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC Crane)
Harnessing the Power of Technology for the Warfighter

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: setroub;eshoot problem

2008-07-15 Thread max bianco
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 9:20 AM, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  max bianco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I went to start setroubleshoot, Applications-System Tools-SE Linux 
  Troubleshooter and I get this message:
 
  connection failed at /var/run/setroubleshoot/setroubleshoo_tserver. 
  Connection refused
 
  #ls -lZ /var/run/setroubleshoot/setroubleshoot_server
  srw-rw-rw-  root root system_u:object_r:setroubleshoot_var_run_t 
  /var/run/setroubleshoot/setroubleshoot_server
 
 That looks right. Is it F8 or F9?
 SETroubleshoot is usually on, do you remember why you turned it off?

 This is F9 and I didn't turm setroubleshoot off - not on purpose.anyway  }-P
 If I look in System-Administration-Services at setroubleshootd, it says 
 that it is enabled but the status is unknown

It usually runs in the background and only wakes up when needed,
however you should stil be able to run it from Applications--System
Tools--SELinux Troubleshooter with out a problem. I can in fact do
that here. Do you have all current updates? Do you know what version
of policy you are running? Have you recently installed any custom
policy? Did you switch SELinux to permissive recently ?  I assume you
have stopped and restarted the service. Which kernel are you running?
Have you checked for bugs filed against setroubleshoot? There are
quite a few bugs filed against it, maybe one of these is related to
the problem your having.

Try these commands:

rpm -qa 'selinux*'

rpm -qa 'setrouble*'

sestatus

uname -a


Post the results, with that info there might be more help to be had.





-- 
If opinions were really like assholes we'd each have just one

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: modprobe blacklist

2008-07-15 Thread Todd Denniston

john f jarvis wrote, On 07/15/2008 08:44 AM:

On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 23:05 -0700, Tod Merley wrote:

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 5:32 AM, john f jarvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

To use gpsbabel with my Garmin Venture Hc gps receiver I must
first remove the FC9 builtin garmin_gps usb module.
As su this works: /sbin/rmmod garmin_gps

My question: How can I use the blacklist feature of modprobe
to do this automatically? Adding the line: blacklist garmin_gps
to /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist and/or modprobe.conf.dist
doesn't work.
   Thanks, John Jarvis

--

Hi John Jarvis!

I would look carefully at the output of lsmod before and after the use
of rmmod.  Likey there is another companion module you need to
blacklist to make this work.  To make one of my wireless modems work
for example I neede to blacklist oronco and oronco_cs to get the job
done.

Good Hunting!

Tod


Thank you Tod:
lsmod does show two modules are loaded: garmin_gps, usbserial
Adding both of them to /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist doesn't prevent
loading them when the GPS receiver is connected. Where do hotplug
scripts live?
John



are you booting with the garmin plugged in?

I found (over the years) that if you want things in /etc/mod* to take effect 
at boot, you need to rebuild the initrd after making the mod.


An alternative, for testing purposes, is just rm/mv the module for now.

--
Todd Denniston
Crane Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC Crane)
Harnessing the Power of Technology for the Warfighter

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: Intel Soundmax integrated adapter No Sound

2008-07-15 Thread stan

Robert McBroom (TNWestTex) wrote:

Seems that root can see the sound system.  Tried adding user to all groups that 
seemed to apply to sound but still do not get any sound as aregular user.

Robert McBroom



Download and run the script at
http://www.alsa-project.org/alsa-info.sh
Then post the link back here to enable others to see 
the output.

If you just want to run it for personal use run it as
./alsa-info.sh --no-upload

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


sshd fails to start

2008-07-15 Thread roland

Hello,
When I try to start sshd I have the following message:
Starting of sshd:sshd: WARNING: Default configuration file  
/etc/ssh2/sshd2_config does not exist

: WARING: ssh_privkey_read from /etc/ssh2/hostkey failed
: FATAL: Unable to load any hostkeys
Before this message he starts creating the rsa and dsa keys in /etc/ssh

How can I solv this problem?

Thanks for your help
--
Roland Brouwers
C.A.T. bvba

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: sshd fails to start

2008-07-15 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson

roland wrote:

Hello,
When I try to start sshd I have the following message:
Starting of sshd:sshd: WARNING: Default configuration file 
/etc/ssh2/sshd2_config does not exist

: WARING: ssh_privkey_read from /etc/ssh2/hostkey failed
: FATAL: Unable to load any hostkeys
Before this message he starts creating the rsa and dsa keys in /etc/ssh

How can I solve this problem?

From the error message it is looking for the files in ssh2, instead 
of ssh. I am not sure why this is. Did they change things in F9, or 
did you install ssh from something besides the Fedora RPM?


Mikkel
--

  Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

Re: KWin (KDE4 from rawhide) using way too much CPU (nvidia driver problem)

2008-07-15 Thread Vini Engel

Kevin Kofler said the following on 07/13/2008 04:49 AM:

Vini Engel vini at fugspbr.org writes:
When I enable Desktop Effects kwin and xorg take about 30% of the CPU 
each. kwin sometimes takes as much as 80%, this is slowing down my 
machine heaps. Although I could just disable the desktop effects and 
resolve the problem I would rather give feedback to any KDE/Fedora 
developers out there and assist with the resolution of this issue.


My machine is an Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T9300 @ 2.50GHz with 4GB 
of RAM and a nVidia Corporation GeForce 8400M GS with 128MB.


The proprietary nvidia driver is known to have absymal performance, and we 
can't fix it because it's proprietary. Blame nVidia. There's nothing we can do 
about it.


Well, it may not be the best driver out there but before Fedora 9 it did 
work very well for me. The fact is that my problem is not really related 
to performance, the overall performance of my machine is pretty good. 
The problem is that xorg and kwin use too much CPU, it doesn't bother me 
much apart from using more battery. If it doesn't jump up to 80% my 
machine goes ok, I have disabled some of the desktop effects and it 
improved.


I think we cannot blame nVidia for this because what is being used here 
is the CPU and not the GPU. Unless there is clear proof that their drive 
actually causes it to happen the problem to me will be related to the 
way KDE4 is handling OpenGL for its 'special' effects.


Vini

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?

2008-07-15 Thread Joe Klemmer
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 07:40 -0400, Mark Haney wrote:

 Personally, I think the demand by Stallman, and others to call Linux
 'GNU/Linux' is just stupid and childish.  As if changing the name will
 change the nature of the system.  While I am an advocate of free and
 open source software, and agree with some of his ideas, Stallman needs
 a bloody valium.  To me he's a lot like Jack Thompson, foams at the
 mouth over the silliest things.

While I personally think RMS is, well, let's say over zealous and leave
it at that... He is what I'd call a necessary evil.  He swings the
pendulum so far the one direction that it keeps the whole thing
balanced.  Irritating as he and his fellows may be, they do serve a
needed purpose.

-- 
Using Linux since 11/91 |  http://www.linux.org
Linux user #29402   |  http://counter.li.org/
Fedora Linux|  http://www.fedoraproject.org

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: sshd fails to start

2008-07-15 Thread roland
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:00:44 +0200, Mikkel L. Ellertson  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



roland wrote:

Hello,
When I try to start sshd I have the following message:
Starting of sshd:sshd: WARNING: Default configuration file
/etc/ssh2/sshd2_config does not exist
: WARING: ssh_privkey_read from /etc/ssh2/hostkey failed
: FATAL: Unable to load any hostkeys
Before this message he starts creating the rsa and dsa keys in /etc/ssh

How can I solve this problem?


 From the error message it is looking for the files in ssh2, instead
of ssh. I am not sure why this is. Did they change things in F9, or
did you install ssh from something besides the Fedora RPM?


It is a standart installation K12ltsp
But
I wanted to sync 2 servers with rsync without asking for a password. So I  
generated a key with ssh-keygen and suddenly he created a .ssh2. I suppose  
I don't need this ssh2 but I don't how to remove it. I found that in  
/etc/rc.d/rc5.d/S55sshd this is generated if a dsa_key or rsa_key exists  
in /etc/ssh/. So I removed those keys. But still he creates those keys  
when sshd is started and he looks then for the ssh2_config file.


??
Roland




--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: Fedora 9 Help creating jigdo file

2008-07-15 Thread g

Robert P. J. Day wrote:

i should probably take the time to update that unless the new official
fedora jigdo page is perfectly acceptable, at which point my page
would be unnecessary.


rday,

in this day and with information always being needed, your page could
not hurt.

will add it to my collection.

later.


--

tc,hago.

g
.

in a free world without fences, who needs gates.

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: Intel Soundmax integrated adapter No Sound

2008-07-15 Thread Nigel Henry
On Tuesday 15 July 2008 15:48, Robert McBroom (TNWestTex) wrote:
 Seems that root can see the sound system.  Tried adding user to all groups
 that seemed to apply to sound but still do not get any sound as aregular
 user.

 Robert McBroom

Hi Robert. First time I've seen this thread although Re is in the subject 
line.

Could you provide a bit of info please.

Which Fedora version is this? Are you using Gnome, or KDE?

If this is Fedora 8, or 9, they are both using pulseaudio as a sound server, 
and some folks are having problems with it. I disabled it on my Fedora 8 
install, as the sounds didn't work with it enabled. To disable it, simply 
remove the package alsa-plugins-pulseaudio, and then Alsa will be used 
directly for the sounds. You can always re-install it when the sounds are 
working.

Would you also post the output from the following commands when running as 
user.
cat /proc/asound/cards
cat /proc/asound/version
/sbin/lsmod | grep snd
/sbin/lspci   (just the part for the soundcard will do)

That will do for the moment.

Nigel.

btw. You should not have to add any users to /etc/group with Fedora, as this 
is handled in a different way to Debian installs. It should just work.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: that old GNU/Linux argument

2008-07-15 Thread Joe Klemmer
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 02:48 +0200, Björn Persson wrote:

  Personally, I think the demand by Stallman, and others to call Linux
  'GNU/Linux' is just stupid and childish.
 
 What exactly is it that you don't want to call GNU/Linux? What pieces of 
 software does it contain?

I honestly tried to skip over this message but my I'm feeling
antagonistic today impulses overpowered my reason.

 Is Udev part of what you call Linux?
Yes.
 Is Bash part of what you call Linux?
Yes.
 Is GCC part of what you call Linux?
Yes.
 Is Yum part of what you call Linux?
Yes.
 Is Apache HTTPD part of what you call Linux?
Yes.
 Is Sylpheed part of what you call Linux?
Yes.
 Is GNU Chess part of what you call Linux?
Yes.
 Is Kylix part of what you call Linux?
And, well, yes.

While it's a fact that the kernel is the only part of any distro that's
actually named Linux, The name has become attached to the entire OS.  It
is the de facto name for any OS that runs the Linux kernel regardless of
what the rest of the distro includes.  That's the reality of it and
there's no changing it.

BTW, has the FSF been as vocal about GNU/FreeBSD?  Not picking on *BSD,
just curious.

-- 
Life is hard. After all, it kills you.
-- Katharine Hepburn

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: Fedora 9 is not recognised

2008-07-15 Thread g


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I received Fedora 9 from a Linux magazine.If I load it in my DVD rom
it is not
recognised.I am not able to proceed further.

Is the media not good or the software?


from which linux magazine?

is f9 a 'boot', an 'install', or an 'iso'?

are you using oos to read dvd or a linux install?

being that you are '@aim/com' i would guess oos.
which version?


--

tc,hago.

g
.

in a free world without fences, who needs gates.

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: Fedora 9 is not recognised

2008-07-15 Thread abhishek rane
I guess you must have bought digit or chip which comes loaded with other
softwares plus F9..U can contact them bout the media..usually the vendor u
bought the magazine from exchanges it if u tell em its not working(its so
near my place in mumbai).sure its the media contact the magazine vendor

2008/7/15 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 I received Fedora 9 from a Linux magazine.If I load it in my DVD rom it is
 not recognised.I am not able to proceed further.

 Is the media not good or the software?

 Ramachandran.C
 --
 The Famous, the Infamous, the Lame - in your browser. Get the TMZ Toolbar
 Now http://toolbar.aol.com/tmz/download.html?NCID=aolcmp000514!

 --
 fedora-list mailing list
 fedora-list@redhat.com
 To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

Re: KDE4 groupupdate fails on F9 packagekit

2008-07-15 Thread Craig White
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 20:53 +0530, abhishek rane wrote:
  Hello I am using fedora 9 with KDE4 on intel system dg33fb..while
 trying to update KDE4(as the workspace is crashing constantly) i got
 the following errors(attached to text file).Can anyone infer the
 problems?

rpm -e crystalsvg-icon-theme-4.0.3-3.fc9.i386

that package is interfering with the update...perhaps you can re-install
it afterwards

Craig

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: KDE4 groupupdate fails on F9 packagekit

2008-07-15 Thread Kevin Kofler
abhishek rane abhishekrane at gmail.com writes:
  Hello I am using fedora 9 with KDE4 on intel system dg33fb..while trying to
 update KDE4(as the workspace is crashing constantly) i got the following
 errors(attached to text file). Can anyone infer the problems?

Don't use groupupdate, update everything.

Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: sshd fails to start

2008-07-15 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 17:13 +0200, roland wrote:
 It is a standart installation K12ltsp

You mean it's not Fedora? I don't know what version of SSH is on
K12ltsp, but possibly it's the older one that put SSH2 stuff in ssh2
directories.

poc

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: KDE4 groupupdate fails on F9 packagekit

2008-07-15 Thread abhishek rane
I have a slow connection so its not possible to update everything for me.The
updates are about 1.1 GB

On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 9:03 PM, Kevin Kofler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 abhishek rane abhishekrane at gmail.com writes:
   Hello I am using fedora 9 with KDE4 on intel system dg33fb..while trying
 to
  update KDE4(as the workspace is crashing constantly) i got the following
  errors(attached to text file). Can anyone infer the problems?

 Don't use groupupdate, update everything.

Kevin Kofler

 --
 fedora-list mailing list
 fedora-list@redhat.com
 To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

Re: KDE4 groupupdate fails on F9 packagekit

2008-07-15 Thread abhishek rane
I also tried this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ sudo rpm -e kdelibs3-3.5.9-8.fc9.i386
error: Failed dependencies:
libDCOP.so.4 is needed by (installed) kdepim-libs-3.5.9-9.fc9.i386
libDCOP.so.4 is needed by (installed) kaffeine-0.8.6-4.fc9.i386
libDCOP.so.4 is needed by (installed) kdepim-3.5.9-9.fc9.i386
libDCOP.so.4 is needed by (installed) digikam-0.9.3-2.fc9.i386
libDCOP.so.4 is needed by (installed) k3b-1.0.4-6.fc9.i386
libDCOP.so.4 is needed by (installed) konversation-1.0.1-6.fc9.i386
libDCOP.so.4 is needed by (installed) kpowersave-0.7.3-3.fc9.i386
libDCOP.so.4 is needed by (installed) kdbg-2.1.0-2.fc9.i386
libDCOP.so.4 is needed by (installed) kdelibs3-devel-3.5.9-8.fc9.i386
libDCOP.so.4 is needed by (installed) kdevelop-3.5.1-4.fc9.i386
libDCOP.so.4 is needed by (installed) kdevelop-libs-3.5.1-4.fc9.i386
libDCOP.so.4 is needed by (installed) amarok-1.4.9.1-3.fc9.i386
libDCOP.so.4 is needed by (installed)
k3b-extras-nonfree-1.0.4-2.lvn9.i386
libDCOP.so.4 is needed by (installed) katapult-0.3.2.1-3.fc9.i386
libartskde.so.1 is needed by (installed) kdepim-3.5.9-9.fc9.i386
libartskde.so.1 is needed by (installed) kdelibs3-devel-3.5.9-8.fc9.i386
libkabc.so.1 is needed by (installed) kdepim-libs-3.5.9-9.fc9.i386
libkabc.so.1 is needed by (installed)
kdebase3-pim-ioslaves-3.5.9-10.fc9.i386
libkabc.so.1 is needed by (installed) kdepim-3.5.9-9.fc9.i386
libkabc.so.1 is needed by (installed) digikam-0.9.3-2.fc9.i386
libkabc.so.1 is needed by (installed) konversation-1.0.1-6.fc9.i386
libkabc.so.1 is needed by (installed) kdelibs3-devel-3.5.9-8.fc9.i386
libkabc_dir.so.1 is needed by (installed)
kdelibs3-devel-3.5.9-8.fc9.i386
libkabc_file.so.1 is needed by (installed) kdepim-libs-3.5.9-9.fc9.i386
libkabc_file.so.1 is needed by (installed) kdepim-3.5.9-9.fc9.i386
libkabc_file.so.1 is needed by (installed)
kdelibs3-devel-3.5.9-8.fc9.i386
libkabc_ldapkio.so.1 is needed by (installed)
kdelibs3-devel-3.5.9-8.fc9.i386
libkatepartinterfaces.so.0 is needed by (installed)
kdelibs3-devel-3.5.9-8.fc9.i386
libkdecore.so.4 is needed by (installed)
kdnssd-avahi-0.1.3-0.6.20080116svn.fc9.i386
libkdecore.so.4 is needed by (installed) kdepim-libs-3.5.9-9.fc9.i386
libkdecore.so.4 is needed by (installed) libkipi-0.1.5-4.fc9.i386
libkdecore.so.4 is needed by (installed) libkdcraw-0.1.3-2.fc9.i386
libkdecore.so.4 is needed by (installed) libkexiv2-0.1.6-4.fc9.i386
libkdecore.so.4 is needed by (installed) kaffeine-0.8.6-4.fc9.i386
libkdecore.so.4 is needed by (installed) kaffeine-libs-0.8.6-4.fc9.i386
libkdecore.so.4 is needed by (installed)
kdebase3-pim-ioslaves-3.5.9-10.fc9.i386
libkdecore.so.4 is needed by (installed) kdepim-3.5.9-9.fc9.i386
libkdecore.so.4 is needed by (installed) digikam-0.9.3-2.fc9.i386
libkdecore.so.4 is needed by (installed)
kipi-plugins-0.1.5-0.6.rc2.fc9.i386
libkdecore.so.4 is needed by (installed) k3b-1.0.4-6.fc9.i386
libkdecore.so.4 is needed by (installed) kftpgrabber-0.8.1-6.fc9.i386
libkdecore.so.4 is needed by (installed) konversation-1.0.1-6.fc9.i386
libkdecore.so.4 is needed by (installed) kpowersave-0.7.3-3.fc9.i386
libkdecore.so.4 is needed by (installed) ksshaskpass-0.4-2.fc9.i386
libkdecore.so.4 is needed by (installed) kdbg-2.1.0-2.fc9.i386
libkdecore.so.4 is needed by (installed) kdelibs3-devel-3.5.9-8.fc9.i386
libkdecore.so.4 is needed by (installed) kdevelop-3.5.1-4.fc9.i386
libkdecore.so.4 is needed by (installed) kdevelop-libs-3.5.1-4.fc9.i386
libkdecore.so.4 is needed by (installed) amarok-1.4.9.1-3.fc9.i386
libkdecore.so.4 is needed by (installed)
k3b-extras-nonfree-1.0.4-2.lvn9.i386
libkdecore.so.4 is needed by (installed) katapult-0.3.2.1-3.fc9.i386
libkdefakes.so.4 is needed by (installed) kdepim-libs-3.5.9-9.fc9.i386
libkdefakes.so.4 is needed by (installed)
kdelibs3-devel-3.5.9-8.fc9.i386
libkdefx.so.4 is needed by (installed) kdepim-libs-3.5.9-9.fc9.i386
libkdefx.so.4 is needed by (installed) kdepim-3.5.9-9.fc9.i386
libkdefx.so.4 is needed by (installed) digikam-0.9.3-2.fc9.i386
libkdefx.so.4 is needed by (installed)
kipi-plugins-0.1.5-0.6.rc2.fc9.i386
libkdefx.so.4 is needed by (installed) k3b-1.0.4-6.fc9.i386
libkdefx.so.4 is needed by (installed) kdbg-2.1.0-2.fc9.i386
libkdefx.so.4 is needed by (installed) kdelibs3-devel-3.5.9-8.fc9.i386
libkdefx.so.4 is needed by (installed) amarok-1.4.9.1-3.fc9.i386
libkdefx.so.4 is needed by (installed)
k3b-extras-nonfree-1.0.4-2.lvn9.i386
libkdeinit_kded.so is needed by (installed) kdevelop-3.5.1-4.fc9.i386
libkdeprint.so.4 is needed by (installed) kdepim-libs-3.5.9-9.fc9.i386
libkdeprint.so.4 is needed by (installed) kdepim-3.5.9-9.fc9.i386
libkdeprint.so.4 is needed by (installed) digikam-0.9.3-2.fc9.i386
libkdeprint.so.4 is needed by (installed)

Fedora Accounts System Site Registration Server down

2008-07-15 Thread abhishek rane
Well I lost my previous FAS accounts id(forgot it aww!).Trying to create a
new account on FAS site https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/new
but  does not wok..after filling details I get a server down error and this
has been happening for a couple of days.
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

Re: that old GNU/Linux argument

2008-07-15 Thread Joe Klemmer
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 23:25 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:

 If you take *GNU* libc, rebuild it to target a different kernel while
 exporting the same ABI, and voila, you can drop Linux entirely from
 what you call a Linux Operating System, and pretty much all
 applications will still work just the same.  Because they're not
 applications for Linux.  They're applications for GNU libc.  They
 couldn't care less that they're running on top of the kernel Linux.
 For them, the kernel is irrelevant.

This sounds like you're making the argument that all beer
should be called Water/Beer because water isn't specific to beer and
can be used with/in any other beverage.  Water couldn't care less that
it's mixing with hops or wheat.  For water, the other ingredients are
irrelevant.

You seem to be making a good case that the GNU parts are
ubiquitous and therefor there's no reason to explicitly state their
inclusion.

 Next frequently raised fallacious objections?

Well, this has been fun.  My need for mindless ranting...  
Uh, I mean debate as been filled.  Back to what's loosely known
as productivity.

-- 
The early bird gets the worm,
but the second mouse gets the cheese.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: KDE4 groupupdate fails on F9 packagekit

2008-07-15 Thread Kevin Kofler
abhishek rane abhishekrane at gmail.com writes:
 I have a slow connection so its not possible to update everything for me.
 The updates are about 1.1 GB

The updates are interdependent, so you have to update everything. Well, at 
least everything related to KDE, but a groupinstall won't catch it all.

Maybe this can help: https://fedorahosted.org/presto

Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: sshd fails to start

2008-07-15 Thread roland
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:33:44 +0200, Patrick O'Callaghan  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 17:13 +0200, roland wrote:

It is a standart installation K12ltsp


You mean it's not Fedora? I don't know what version of SSH is on
K12ltsp, but possibly it's the older one that put SSH2 stuff in ssh2
directories.


K12ltsp is Fedora

So, what can be the solution. Or how can I get rid of this ssh2?

Roland


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: that old GNU/Linux argument

2008-07-15 Thread max bianco
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Joe Klemmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 23:25 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:

 If you take *GNU* libc, rebuild it to target a different kernel while
 exporting the same ABI, and voila, you can drop Linux entirely from
 what you call a Linux Operating System, and pretty much all
 applications will still work just the same.  Because they're not
 applications for Linux.  They're applications for GNU libc.  They
 couldn't care less that they're running on top of the kernel Linux.
 For them, the kernel is irrelevant.

This sounds like you're making the argument that all beer
 should be called Water/Beer because water isn't specific to beer and
 can be used with/in any other beverage.  Water couldn't care less that
 it's mixing with hops or wheat.  For water, the other ingredients are
 irrelevant.

You seem to be making a good case that the GNU parts are
 ubiquitous and therefor there's no reason to explicitly state their
 inclusion.

 Next frequently raised fallacious objections?

Well, this has been fun.  My need for mindless ranting...
 Uh, I mean debate as been filled.  Back to what's loosely known
 as productivity.

 --
 The early bird gets the worm,
 but the second mouse gets the cheese.

 --
 fedora-list mailing list
 fedora-list@redhat.com
 To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Its amazing to me that with all these brains nobody likes to discuss
strategies and solutions, just a bunch of endless nitpicking and
finger pointing. Its no wonder Microsoft dominates the desktop
computer market.

-- 
Travelling through hyperspace ain't like dusting crops boy.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


SOLVED: F9 Problem setting resolution and video lockups

2008-07-15 Thread Joe Klemmer
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 04:45 +, g wrote:

  The problem is when I set the monitor as you show above the only 
  options for resolution are 800x600 and 640x480.  Nothing I do will get 
  me anything no higher than 800x600.
 
 as 'root' or 'user'?

As root.

 also, try 'display' as 'root' and select 'generic' 1280x1024.

I finally got this working.  I had to go and find the exact specs for
the Daewoo 707B monitor then manually enter them into the xorg.config
file.  I also needed to add the actual modes in the screen section.  Now
I'm running at 1280x1024 and have lots of desktop room to fill.  :-)

My config file looks like this -

# Xorg configuration created by system-config-display

Section ServerLayout
Identifier single head configuration
Screen  0  Screen0 0 0
InputDeviceKeyboard0 CoreKeyboard
EndSection

Section InputDevice

# keyboard added by rhpxl
Identifier  Keyboard0
Driver  kbd
Option  XkbModel pc105
Option  XkbLayout us
EndSection

Section Monitor
Identifier   Monitor0
ModelNameDaewoo 707B
HorizSync30.0 - 69.0
VertRefresh  50.0 - 120.0
Option  dpms
EndSection

Section Device
Identifier  Videocard0
Driver  nv
EndSection

Section Screen
Identifier Screen0
Device Videocard0
MonitorMonitor0
DefaultDepth 24
SubSection Display
Viewport   0 0
Depth 24
Modes1280x1024 1280x960 1152x864 1024x768 800x600
640x480
EndSubSection
EndSection

-- 
Huh?!? - Me, two seconds after being told not to lean on that big red
button and one second before the Haylon system activated.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: sshd fails to start

2008-07-15 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 18:05 +0200, roland wrote:
 On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:33:44 +0200, Patrick O'Callaghan  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 17:13 +0200, roland wrote:
  It is a standart installation K12ltsp
 
  You mean it's not Fedora? I don't know what version of SSH is on
  K12ltsp, but possibly it's the older one that put SSH2 stuff in ssh2
  directories.
 
 K12ltsp is Fedora

According to the Wiki, K12LTSP is based on CentOS Linux and the Linux
Terminal Server Project. There is also a Fedora-based version called
K12Linux. I've no idea what the differences are.

 So, what can be the solution. Or how can I get rid of this ssh2?

Start by finding out exactly which version of ssh you have:

# rpm -qa \*ssh\*

poc

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: compile graphical ssh - GFTP

2008-07-15 Thread Anne Wilson
On Tuesday 15 July 2008 13:44:20 wwp wrote:
 GFTP is a pretty dead project tome, the author is not responding (at
 least, was few years ago) and not reacting to bug reports and patch
 submission.
 Moreover, it's too easy to make it crash with reproducible and simple
 scenarii, thus I recently switched to filezilla, which is much more
 mature and stable.

A dead project it might be, but I've used it for years, and am still using it 
regularly.  I've never yet seen it crash.

Anne


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

Re: that old GNU/Linux argument

2008-07-15 Thread Les Mikesell

Andrew Kelly wrote:


snip for brevity


Except that what you call Linux software isn't actually for Linux.
Have you ever heard of Nexenta (GNU/kOpenSolaris), Debian
GNU/kFreeBSD, and even UnixWare?

If you take *GNU* libc, rebuild it to target a different kernel while
exporting the same ABI, and voila, you can drop Linux entirely from
what you call a Linux Operating System, and pretty much all
applications will still work just the same.  Because they're not
applications for Linux.  They're applications for GNU libc.  They
couldn't care less that they're running on top of the kernel Linux.
For them, the kernel is irrelevant.

Next frequently raised fallacious objections?


Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the sound of a shoe dropping.
[applause]

That was a fabulous exchange, very well stated, very well explained.

Alexandre, very impressed with your ability to avoid vitriolic and
abusive tone. Very impressed.


Except that he didn't go quite far enough with that explanation.  Not 
only is Linux just one implementation of the more or less standard 
Unix/Posix system call interface that predates it, but so is GNU libc 
just another implementation of the pre-existing standard c library 
specification and sensibly written programs have no dependencies on any 
specific implementations of these standards.  From his description you 
might think that it would make sense to say GNU/apache or GNU/sendmail 
when in fact, like most such programs  there is no such relationship and 
they run just fine when built on *bsd or commercial unix C libraries - 
as they were before glib existed.


It would make more sense to describe a lot of things as the GNU 
re-implementation of... rather than to imply that they were created as 
original designs or are the only versions that exist.


--
  Les Mikesell
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: KWin (KDE4 from rawhide) using way too much CPU (nvidia driver problem)

2008-07-15 Thread Anne Wilson
On Tuesday 15 July 2008 16:11:55 Vini Engel wrote:
  The proprietary nvidia driver is known to have absymal performance, and
  we can't fix it because it's proprietary. Blame nVidia. There's nothing
  we can do about it.

 Well, it may not be the best driver out there but before Fedora 9 it did
 work very well for me. The fact is that my problem is not really related
 to performance, the overall performance of my machine is pretty good.
 The problem is that xorg and kwin use too much CPU, it doesn't bother me
 much apart from using more battery. If it doesn't jump up to 80% my
 machine goes ok, I have disabled some of the desktop effects and it
 improved.

 I think we cannot blame nVidia for this because what is being used here
 is the CPU and not the GPU. Unless there is clear proof that their drive
 actually causes it to happen the problem to me will be related to the
 way KDE4 is handling OpenGL for its 'special' effects.

There has been a good deal of discussion of this on the kde-devel list.  The 
problems do affect only some cards, but excessive cpu usage is definitely a 
symptom.  The fact that kde and nvidia have discussed the problem and that 
nvidia acknowledge it does mean that nothing can be done until nvidia have 
sorted it at their end.

The problem apparently stems from some parts of the driver which have, in 
theory, supported certain requirements for some years, but because programs 
have not been written to use the facility there has been little opportunity 
to see what happens in real-life situations.  KDE's pushing of the boundaries 
with 4.x is opening that area up.  NVidia appear to be willing to work to 
sort this out, so we must wait for them.

Anne




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

Re: SOLVED: F9 Problem setting resolution and video lockups

2008-07-15 Thread g

Joe Klemmer wrote:
snip

I finally got this working.  I had to go and find the exact specs for


great. give yourself a 'pat on back' and a 'that a boy'. you deserve it.

how far off where settings or did you notice?

if it were a perfect world there would be just 2 operating
systems, linux and unix, then oems would be more willing to
release their specs.

i started out in unix when it was a termcaps file with mono
and very little color. i spent many hours building settings
for monitors that where not in file. printers were even more
fun.

understandings from this has helped when clients friends have
lost oem manuals.


I also needed to add the actual modes in the screen section.


you really only need what you are going to use, unless you are
going to do a lot of screen magnifying.

you might want to send a bug correction on for monitor. who knows,
some one else might buy one and try to use it in f9. ;o)


--

tc,hago.

g
.

in a free world without fences, who needs gates.

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: F9: Compiled and created rt2870sta.ko, but where to install?

2008-07-15 Thread Dan Thurman

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:


On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 17:13 -0700, Dan Thurman wrote:
 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
 
  On Sat, 2008-07-12 at 17:39 -0700, Dan Thurman wrote:
   As a side note, I wonder why this module is not included in the
   F8/9 repository since it is freely available?  I am assuming this
   is license-free?
 
  Two points:
 
  1) Every package in the standard Fedora repos is licensed. If you 
mean
  the module comes with a free software license and thus could 
potentially

  be part of Fedora then of course that's something else, but it's not
  what you said.
 
  2) When you say it's freely available do you mean you just 
downloaded
  it from the manufacturer's site *without* having to click on a 
license
  agreement? It would be helpful if you gave the URL you got it 
from. One
  of the keys to getting useful answers is to provide enough 
information

  in the question.
 
 I obtained the rt2870 software from:
 http://www.ralinktech.com/ralink/Home/Support/Linux.html
 and the specific file I downloaded was: RT2870USB(RT2870/RT2870)
 
http://www.ralinktech.com.tw/data/drivers/2008_0528_RT2870_Linux_STA_v1.3.0.0.tar.bz2 




  From what I can tell, it is an Open-Source Organization and I
 did not see any licensing in regards to the code i.e. I do not
 think I recall having to click on any license agreements.

The fact that there's no visible license makes me think it's not Open
Source or Free within the accepted guidelines, just that they provide
source code.

 Anyway, does anyone have any helpful links that might help
 me in properly installing and setting up the Wireless software?

The README file says:

6 load driver, go to os/linux/ directory.
#[kernel 2.4]
#$/sbin/insmod rt2870sta.o
#$/sbin/ifconfig ra0 inet YOUR_IP up

#[kernel 2.6]
#$/sbin/insmod rt2870sta.ko
#$/sbin/ifconfig ra0 inet YOUR_IP up

Which seems pretty clear.


Yes, it seems clear - but what is not clear is there is no mention
of where to put rt2870sta.ko  If you had built the driver in your home
directory, and performed the above setup and later blew away your
build directory, the system will fail to find and load that driver!  I
looked in the /lib/modules/ area and tried to find the best place for
this driver to reside but then again - no matter where I placed it (in
several */net/wirless locations or usb or where-ever, I could not get
this driver to appear listed in the 'Other Wireless' under the Network
tool. So, moving on.

So, I elected to put this file at:
/lib/modules/$KERNEL_VER/kernel/net/wireless/rt2870sta.ko

Per instructions:
# insmod lib/modules/$KERNEL_VER/kernel/net/wireless/rt2870sta.ko

Next, I had to create the ifcfg_ra0 file in:
/etc/sysconfig/networking/devices/ifcfg-ra0

which contains:
# RT2870 WLAN USB Connection
BOOTPROTO=none
DEVICE=ra0
ONBOOT=yes
ESSID=myHomeWifi
IPADDR=10.1.0.15
IPV6INIT=no
NETMASK=255.0.0.0
HWADDR=00:1d:6a:33:fd:42
TYPE=Wireless
CHANNEL=6
MODE=auto
RATE=auto
DHCP_HOSTNAME=
DOMAIN=myDomain.com
SEARCH=myDomain.com
DNS1=10.1.0.1
DNS2=10.1.0.2
DNS3=10.1.0.3
USERCTL=no
PEERDNS=yes
NM_CONTROLLED=no

Per README instructions, I was to place the following
file as specified:
/etc/Wireless/etc/Wireless/RT2870STA/RT2870STA.dat

Which contains:
cat RT2870STA.dat
#The word of Default must not be removed
Default
AckPolicy=0;0;0;0
APSDAC=0;0;0;0
APSDCapable=0
AuthMode=WPA2PSK
BeaconPeriod=100
BGProtection=0
Channel=6
ChannelGeography=1
CountryCode=US
CountryRegion=5
CountryRegionABand=7
DefaultKeyID=1
EncrypType=AES
FastRoaming=1
FragThreshold=2346
HT_AMSDU=0
HT_AutoBA=1
HT_BADecline=0
HT_BADecline=0
HT_BAWinSize=64
HT_BW=1
HT_EXTCHA=0
HT_GI=1
HT_MCS=33
HT_MIMOPSMode=3
HT_MpduDensity=4
HT_OpMode=1
HT_RDG=1
IEEE80211H=0
Key1Str=
Key1Type=1
Key2Str=
Key2Type=1
Key3Str=
Key3Type=1
Key4Str=
Key4Type=1
NetworkType=Infra
PktAggregate=0
PSMode=CAM
RoamThreshold=70
RTSThreshold=2347
SSID=myHomeWifi
TGnWifiTest=0
TxBurst=1
TxPower=100
TxPreamble=0
WirelessEvent=0
WirelessMode=5
WmmCapable=0
WPAPSK=mySecretPassword

I have NO CLUE if this driver actually even loads this file in
this strange location (so it seems).  Moving on

Time to test this all out...
# service network restart

The system logs show:

Error for wireless request Set Mode (8B06) :
   SET failed on device ra0 ; Invalid argument.

Determining IP information for ra0...
=
NOTE: Set Mode (8B06) error.  Scanning the
Internet, some say this can be safely ignored, but
I am not sure that is the case.  Moving on...

I note, for as long as my Ethernet cable is hooked up to
the NIC - I tried to disable eth0 via 'Network Configuration'
tool and noticed that even if I tried to deactivate it, the tool
would keep activating it back on.  So - I had to remove the
cable and only then it will stay down.  There must be something
that senses this and force eth0 back up!  I wonder how to stop
this -auto-reactivation of eth0.  Well, continuing with the 

Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?

2008-07-15 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Jul 14, 2008, Kevin Kofler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Antonio Olivares olivares14031 at yahoo.com writes:
 A Because Fedora includes Firmware and those guys don't.   

 Bullsh*t!

 BLAG 7 ships:
 * the original Fedora 7 kernels as the default and kernel-libre only as an 
 option,

Big surprise, BLAG 7 pre-dates kernel-libre.

 * the following firmwares: asterisk-firmware, atmel-firmware, ivtv-firmware, 
 iwl3945-firmware, iwl4965-firmware, iwlwifi-firmware (old version of 
 iwl3945-firmware), ql2100-firmware, ql2200-firmware, ql23xx-firmware and 
 ql2400-firmware, all with License: Redistributable, no modification 
 permitted
 * zd1211-firmware which claims to be GPLv2, but with no source available.

So this is like gNewSense 2.0 shipping linux-ubuntu-modules containing
non-Free Software.  It was against their policies, it was eventually
fixed.

If you find any such problems in BLAG 8 (never formally released)
or BLAG 9 (released easier today), please report them.  Likewise
gNewSense 2.0, dyne:bolic, UTUTO-XS, Musix GNU+Linux.  Those guys are
serious about it, they have public commitments to that, but like
everyone else they can make mistakes.

As I said before, (honest) policy matters more than the exact bits
that get shipped, and fixing policy is much easier than fixing
software.

 I consider it completely irresponsible to recommend a distribution
 whose current release has not received ANY security updates for a
 month!

Whatever irresponsibility you perceive here is probably just laziness
of publishing announcements about software that has long been
available.  BLAG 7 was old, indeed, and it's a shame it was still
regarded as the latest stable release in spite of the (as of
yesterday) unannounced BLAG 8 and 9.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Free Software Evangelist  [EMAIL PROTECTED], gnu.org}
FSFLA Board Member   ¡Sé Libre! = http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   [EMAIL PROTECTED], gcc.gnu.org}

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?

2008-07-15 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Jul 14, 2008, DJ Delorie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Alexandre Oliva [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 RMS actually has a social reason for his request.  What is the
 reason behind those who refuse?

 Respect for all the other organizations and authors who have
 contributed to the packages within the various Linux-based
 distributions, yet who do not get credited in the name GNU/Linux ?

Again, circular reasoning.  You're talking about GNU+Linux-based
distributions.  You're absolutely correct that some don't get credited
by GNU+Linux, but how is that a logical reason to credit the smaller
contributor Linux and not the larger contributor GNU?  This is covered
in the FAQ, BTW, starting at 
http://www.gnu.org/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html#many

-- 
Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Free Software Evangelist  [EMAIL PROTECTED], gnu.org}
FSFLA Board Member   ¡Sé Libre! = http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   [EMAIL PROTECTED], gcc.gnu.org}

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?

2008-07-15 Thread Kevin Kofler
Alexandre Oliva aoliva at redhat.com writes:
 If you find any such problems in BLAG 8 (never formally released)
 or BLAG 9 (released easier today), please report them.

Here's some I found at a quick glance:

http://www.blagblagblag.org/9/BLAG/RPMS.fedora/zd1211-firmware-1.4-1.noarch.rpm
Yes, it says it's GPLv2. Now try looking at the source code... See also the 
Fedora review request (where I raised that point, wondering if this is legal to 
redistribute at all):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221675#c17

http://www.blagblagblag.org/9/BLAG/RPMS.fedora/midisport-firmware-1.2-1.noarch.rpm
Claims to be GPLv2, but only the firmware loader is GPLv2 (actually dual GPLv2 
or BSD). The package also contains firmware files (in /lib/firmware) under the 
following license:
 The firmware files (*.ihx) are copyrighted by Midiman, and can be used
 and redistributed only as part of this package.
See:
http://usb-midi-fw.cvs.sourceforge.net/usb-midi-fw/midisport-firmware/LICENSE?revision=1.1view=markup

http://www.blagblagblag.org/9/BLAG/RPMS.kriehn/pdftk-1.41-5.fc9.i386.rpm
pdftk was dropped from Fedora for licensing reasons:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=236310
The files have since been fixed not to claim to be confidential and 
proprietary, but the new license is still not acceptable because it forbids 
use in a nuclear facility. If this is not Free enough for Fedora, how come it 
is Free enough for BLAG?

http://www.blagblagblag.org/9/BLAG/RPMS.kriehn/msttcore-fonts-2.0-3.fc9.prof_k.noarch.rpm
Kept the best one for the end. Does this really need a comment?

Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?

2008-07-15 Thread Kevin Kofler
I wrote:
 Claims to be GPLv2, but only the firmware loader is GPLv2 (actually dual
 GPLv2 or BSD).

Or rather, GPLv2+ or MIT.
So in total, the correct License tag for midisport-firmware would be:
(GPLv2+ or MIT) and Redistributable, no modification permitted

Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?

2008-07-15 Thread DJ Delorie

 You're absolutely correct that some don't get credited by GNU+Linux,
 but how is that a logical reason to credit the smaller contributor
 Linux and not the larger contributor GNU?

I didn't say the larger contributors shouldn't get credited.  I object
to the FSF asking for credit *only for them*.  Asking for Linux
distros to be called GNU/Linux makes it sound like the FSF created
Linux, Firefox, Apache, Perl, Gnome, OO, and all those other big parts
of common distros.  *That* I object to.

If the FSF wants to create their own distro that consists primarily of
the Linux kernel and the GNU software, they may call it GNU/Linux (or
anything else they choose ;).  Asking for anything else to be called
GNU/Linux is pure hubris.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?

2008-07-15 Thread NiftyFedora Mitch
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Joe Klemmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 07:40 -0400, Mark Haney wrote:

 Personally, I think the demand by Stallman, and others to call Linux
 'GNU/Linux' is just stupid and childish.  As if changing the name will
 change the nature of the system.  While I am an advocate of free and
 open source software, and agree with some of his ideas, Stallman needs
 a bloody valium.  To me he's a lot like Jack Thompson, foams at the
 mouth over the silliest things.

While I personally think RMS is, well, let's say over zealous and leave
 it at that... He is what I'd call a necessary evil.  He swings the
 pendulum so far the one direction that it keeps the whole thing449-442-806
 balanced.  Irritating as he and his fellows may be, they do serve a
 needed purpose.

I think it is more honest to make reference to GNU/Linux or Linux/GNU.
Without both parts we would not have a working system to have this discussion
on.   Linux systems would not exist without GNU tools, compiler and libs.

GNU+Linux+hardware = system

We _should_ pay attention to the shoulders of those that got us here!

-- 
NiftyFedora
T o m   M i t c h e l l

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?

2008-07-15 Thread jeff moe
Kevin Kofler kevin.kofler at chello.at writes:

 
 Antonio Olivares olivares14031 at yahoo.com writes:
  A Because Fedora includes Firmware and those guys don't.   
 
 Bullsh*t!
 
 BLAG 7 ships:
[gmane tells me to prune]

I am the maintainer of BLAG and I basically agree with what you've said above.

The 7 release was done before linux-libre was done. Moving forward we've
removed all the non-free bits we can find.

BLAG always has updated releases, but they are just called alpha or beta
and used by the BLAG community though they weren't linked on the front page. We
do have updated releases--oftentimes I have releases ready based on fedora
testing even before fedora has done their final release. The repositories are
set up before fedora releases their stable version too.

http://wiki.blagblagblag.org/Roadmap

Last night, I pushed out 9, based on Fedora 9, so it is now linked on our
front page. I will be doing more release early often of 'stable' releases to
address your legitimate concerns.

As for the DNS issue, it compels me to make a confession of a sin against Free
Software. I've been running djbdns the whole decade, not BIND! Thankfully,
djbdns is now in the public domain.  :)

Thanks,

-Jeff

P.S. I'm posting via gmane since i'm not on this list, and the turing-test word
is subverts jejeje.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: compile graphical ssh - GFTP

2008-07-15 Thread wwp
Hello Anne,


On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:20:06 +0100 Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Tuesday 15 July 2008 13:44:20 wwp wrote:
  GFTP is a pretty dead project tome, the author is not responding (at
  least, was few years ago) and not reacting to bug reports and patch
  submission.
  Moreover, it's too easy to make it crash with reproducible and simple
  scenarii, thus I recently switched to filezilla, which is much more
  mature and stable.
 
 A dead project it might be, but I've used it for years, and am still using it 
 regularly.

Me too..


 I've never yet seen it crash.

Well, a simple way to crash it: try to connect to a server that will timeout.


Regards,

-- 
wwp


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?

2008-07-15 Thread Les Mikesell

Alexandre Oliva wrote:



Alexandre Oliva [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

RMS actually has a social reason for his request.  What is the
reason behind those who refuse?



Respect for all the other organizations and authors who have
contributed to the packages within the various Linux-based
distributions, yet who do not get credited in the name GNU/Linux ?


Again, circular reasoning.  You're talking about GNU+Linux-based
distributions.  You're absolutely correct that some don't get credited
by GNU+Linux, but how is that a logical reason to credit the smaller
contributor Linux and not the larger contributor GNU?  This is covered
in the FAQ, BTW, starting at 
http://www.gnu.org/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html#many


A rare bit of honesty there:

  In 2008, we found that GNU packages made up 15% of the “main”
  repository of the gNewSense GNU/Linux distribution. Linux made
  up 1.5%. So the same argument would apply even more strongly
  to calling it “Linux”

Why not name it something that gives the appropriate credit to the 83.5% 
that has nothing to do with GNU instead of usurping the name and 
pretending that GNU is necessary or even desirable in the process of 
creating redistributable software?  Or at least focus the credit on gcc 
which has been something of a driving force because the alternatives 
were expensive.


--
  Les Mikesell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?

2008-07-15 Thread jeff moe
Kevin Kofler kevin.kofler at chello.at writes:

 
 Alexandre Oliva aoliva at redhat.com writes:
  If you find any such problems in BLAG 8 (never formally released)
  or BLAG 9 (released easier today), please report them.
 
 Here's some I found at a quick glance:

Thank you for your research! We have over 10,000 packages in our BLAG 9
repository (based on fedora 9), so things do get missed.

My approach is to generate a list of acceptable %{LICENSE} tags, in their
various forms (GPL, GPLv2, GPLv3, MIT, Public Domain, etc). That list has 383
valid license tags!

I then run a script which goes through the various repos and adds all the
packages with licenses that are acceptable to the Free Software Foundation.

If the packages you mention are included in BLAG and contain non-free software,
this is likely due to them being tagged with an incorrect license. Their
inclusion, if they are non-free, is considered a BUG and they will be removed. I
will go through the packages on your list to confirm your report. I do
appreciate it, as I actually hate licensing issues! I merely want Free Software!

I'll also note that there is *Free* firmware for some drivers, so just because
something is labelled firmware doesn't mean it's not free.

Thanks!

-Jeff

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?

2008-07-15 Thread Francis Earl
 I didn't say the larger contributors shouldn't get credited.  I object
 to the FSF asking for credit *only for them*.  Asking for Linux
 distros to be called GNU/Linux makes it sound like the FSF created
 Linux, Firefox, Apache, Perl, Gnome, OO, and all those other big parts
 of common distros.  *That* I object to.

Just putting it out there, but Gnome is a GNU project... or at least it
was before the GNOME Foundation was created, and is still advertised as
such on GNU's site.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?

2008-07-15 Thread jeff moe
Kevin Kofler kevin.kofler at chello.at writes:

 
 I wrote:
  Claims to be GPLv2, but only the firmware loader is GPLv2 (actually dual
  GPLv2 or BSD).
 
 Or rather, GPLv2+ or MIT.
 So in total, the correct License tag for midisport-firmware would be:
 (GPLv2+ or MIT) and Redistributable, no modification permitted

This would actually be a bug in Fedora then and should have a bugzilla ticket
opened there. As I go thru your list I will open upstream bug reports if you
don't beat me to it. plz beat me to it?  ;)

Thanks again,

-Jeff

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?

2008-07-15 Thread Bjoern Schiessle
Francis Earl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 Just putting it out there, but Gnome is a GNU project... or at least it
 was before the GNOME Foundation was created, and is still advertised as
 such on GNU's site.

GNOME is still part of the GNU project.

GNOME is Free Software and part of the GNU project, dedicated to giving
users and developers the ultimate level of control over their desktops,
their software, and their data. Find out more about the GNU project and
Free Software at gnu.org.

Source: http://www.gnome.org/about/

-- 
Join the Fellowship and protect your freedom! (http://fsfe.org/join)

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?

2008-07-15 Thread Arthur Pemberton
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Bjoern Schiessle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Francis Earl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 Just putting it out there, but Gnome is a GNU project... or at least it
 was before the GNOME Foundation was created, and is still advertised as
 such on GNU's site.

 GNOME is still part of the GNU project.

 GNOME is Free Software and part of the GNU project, dedicated to giving
 users and developers the ultimate level of control over their desktops,
 their software, and their data. Find out more about the GNU project and
 Free Software at gnu.org.

 Source: http://www.gnome.org/about/

ultimate level of control over their desktops I have to say I am
surprised to hear/read that.


-- 
Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
( www.pembo13.com )

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


  1   2   >