Re: DHCP will not grab ip.

2008-10-10 Thread Tim
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 15:41 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> I tried "Ad-hic" as well, so I could set the channel

Ad-hoc mode is for connecting peer-to-peer without an access point, not
the sort of thing that you want to do, usually.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -r
2.6.26.5-45.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: New Konqueror 4.1 Problem - button icons not displayed.

2008-10-10 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 15:09 -0700, Alex Makhlin wrote:
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Alex Makhlin  gmail.com> writes:
> >   
> >> If you like it then keep using it but don't ask questions when it breaks!!
> >> 
> >
> > If it breaks, I just fix it. ;-)
> > See e.g.:
> > http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/kdelibs/F-9/kdelibs-4.1.1-kde%23157789.patch?hideattic=0&revision=1.2&view=markup
> > http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=862491
> > http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=862489
> > (That's my fix for "Stop Animations" not working, in Fedora's KDE 4.1.1, 
> > upstream KDE 4.1.2 and 4.2.)
> >
> > Kevin Kofler
> >
> >   
> Look, this is crazy!! You are using what we call in Russian "a piece of 
> govna" You can't fix a piece of shit like Konqueror, it does not even 
> exist as a valuable tool in the computer world!! Get real man!!

Thank you for your insightful and well-reasoned arguments.

poc

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: X: never before seen display strangeness

2008-10-10 Thread Dave Feustel
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 03:30:29PM -0700, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> --- On Fri, 10/10/08, Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > From: Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: X: never before seen display strangeness
> > To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." 
> > 
> > Date: Friday, October 10, 2008, 3:28 PM
> > On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 06:24:13AM +0900, Slim Joe wrote:
> > > 2008/10/10, Dave Feustel
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > As of two or three days ago, Windows of programs
> > I kill disappear
> > > > from the screen, only to flash back upon the
> > screen for an
> > > > instant before disappearing for good. I've
> > never seen this
> > > > behavior in X before.
> > > 
> > > Hmm. This may be related to the problem I've been
> > having. What kernel
> > > are you using? I've experienced something like
> > this with Linux kernel
> > > 2.6.26 but not with 2.6.25. Maybe (wild, wild guess)
> > it's an
> > > incompatibility between the xserver and kernel.
> > 
> > What command tells me what kernel is being used?
> > 
> > -- 
> 
> Open up a terminal(konsole) type 
> $ uname -a
> $ uname -r
> 
> should give you which kernel you are running :)

Thanks. Hiere is the info:

 2/home/daf}uname -a
Linux c2.localhost.comcast.net 2.6.26.5-45.fc9.i686 #1 SMP Sat Sep 20
03:45:00 EDT 2008 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
 2/home/daf}uname -r
2.6.26.5-45.fc9.i686
 2/home/daf}


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: X: never before seen display strangeness

2008-10-10 Thread Antonio Olivares
--- On Fri, 10/10/08, Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> From: Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: X: never before seen display strangeness
> To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." 
> 
> Date: Friday, October 10, 2008, 3:28 PM
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 06:24:13AM +0900, Slim Joe wrote:
> > 2008/10/10, Dave Feustel
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > As of two or three days ago, Windows of programs
> I kill disappear
> > > from the screen, only to flash back upon the
> screen for an
> > > instant before disappearing for good. I've
> never seen this
> > > behavior in X before.
> > 
> > Hmm. This may be related to the problem I've been
> having. What kernel
> > are you using? I've experienced something like
> this with Linux kernel
> > 2.6.26 but not with 2.6.25. Maybe (wild, wild guess)
> it's an
> > incompatibility between the xserver and kernel.
> 
> What command tells me what kernel is being used?
> 
> -- 

Open up a terminal(konsole) type 
$ uname -a
$ uname -r

should give you which kernel you are running :)

Regards,

Antonio 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27-1.fc10.i686
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ cat /etc/fedora-release 
Fedora release 9.92 (Rawhide)





  

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: X: never before seen display strangeness

2008-10-10 Thread Dave Feustel
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 06:24:13AM +0900, Slim Joe wrote:
> 2008/10/10, Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > As of two or three days ago, Windows of programs I kill disappear
> > from the screen, only to flash back upon the screen for an
> > instant before disappearing for good. I've never seen this
> > behavior in X before.
> 
> Hmm. This may be related to the problem I've been having. What kernel
> are you using? I've experienced something like this with Linux kernel
> 2.6.26 but not with 2.6.25. Maybe (wild, wild guess) it's an
> incompatibility between the xserver and kernel.

What command tells me what kernel is being used?

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: New Konqueror 4.1 Problem - button icons not displayed.

2008-10-10 Thread Alex Makhlin

Kevin Kofler wrote:

Alex Makhlin  gmail.com> writes:
  

If you like it then keep using it but don't ask questions when it breaks!!



If it breaks, I just fix it. ;-)
See e.g.:
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/kdelibs/F-9/kdelibs-4.1.1-kde%23157789.patch?hideattic=0&revision=1.2&view=markup
http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=862491
http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=862489
(That's my fix for "Stop Animations" not working, in Fedora's KDE 4.1.1, 
upstream KDE 4.1.2 and 4.2.)


Kevin Kofler

  
Look, this is crazy!! You are using what we call in Russian "a piece of 
govna" You can't fix a piece of shit like Konqueror, it does not even 
exist as a valuable tool in the computer world!! Get real man!!


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: atheros madwifi driver not working

2008-10-10 Thread Jim

Martín Marqués wrote:

I just got a Compaq Presario F700 which has an Atheros chip based wifi
PCI express card. I check on the web and found that I had to install
madwifi-hal.

I can't find that package in livna, nor can I find it in atrpms, so I
installed kmod-madwifi and madwifi from livna (which installed for
dependencies iwl4965-firmware), but even though the module gets loaded
automatically, the card doesn't work.

What's wrong?

Info:

# lsmod | grep ath
ath_pci   235072  0
wlan  219376  1 ath_pci
ath_hal   282240  1 ath_pci

# lspci -vv
03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications Inc. AR242x
802.11abg Wireless PCI Express Adapter (rev 01)
Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Unknown device 137b
Control: I/O- Mem- BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop-
ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort-
SERR- 
Capabilities: [140] Virtual Channel 
Kernel modules: ath5k, ath_pci

  
FC10 has the kernel-2.6.27 that has drivers for this Wifi card, you 
won't find any help in the 2.6.26.

the livna driver doesn't work right.
I have the eeePC 702 that uses FC 10 2.6.27 and the Atheros Ar5007EG 
WIFI works perfect.


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


atheros madwifi driver not working

2008-10-10 Thread Martín Marqués
I just got a Compaq Presario F700 which has an Atheros chip based wifi
PCI express card. I check on the web and found that I had to install
madwifi-hal.

I can't find that package in livna, nor can I find it in atrpms, so I
installed kmod-madwifi and madwifi from livna (which installed for
dependencies iwl4965-firmware), but even though the module gets loaded
automatically, the card doesn't work.

What's wrong?

Info:

# lsmod | grep ath
ath_pci   235072  0
wlan  219376  1 ath_pci
ath_hal   282240  1 ath_pci

# lspci -vv
03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications Inc. AR242x
802.11abg Wireless PCI Express Adapter (rev 01)
Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Unknown device 137b
Control: I/O- Mem- BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop-
ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort-
SERR- 
Capabilities: [140] Virtual Channel 
Kernel modules: ath5k, ath_pci

-- 
Martín Marqués
select 'martin.marques' || '@' || 'gmail.com'
DBA, Programador, Administrador

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: kernel development approach for fedora

2008-10-10 Thread Mail Lists
.)
> 
> Kevin Kofler
> 

 Thanks for all the thoughts ..

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: X: never before seen display strangeness

2008-10-10 Thread Slim Joe
2008/10/10, Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> As of two or three days ago, Windows of programs I kill disappear
> from the screen, only to flash back upon the screen for an
> instant before disappearing for good. I've never seen this
> behavior in X before.

Hmm. This may be related to the problem I've been having. What kernel
are you using? I've experienced something like this with Linux kernel
2.6.26 but not with 2.6.25. Maybe (wild, wild guess) it's an
incompatibility between the xserver and kernel.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: kernel development approach for fedora

2008-10-10 Thread Chris Snook

Mail Lists wrote:

On 10/10/2008 03:49 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:

Mail Lists wrote:

  In this new mode we would have only  2 streams -  current development
and stable.



There are a few distributions that do this - Gentoo, Arch etc. Each has
it's advantages and disadvantages. One of the problems of rolling
release model distributions in a mass scale is that, it is pretty
difficult to stabilize even to a nominal level.

Rahul



   While that is true, the argument goes that large periodic releases
has drawbacks too - and the kernel seems to be do pretty well with its
approach ... I still wonder whether the kernel way may work for fedora ..


The rolling release model works well for distributions that simply follow 
upstream, but Fedora is often *ahead* of upstream on several features.  We need 
to maintain a bit more stability with the baseline package so we can safely add 
the innovative patches that aren't yet in Linus's kernel tree.


-- Chris

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: kernel development approach for fedora

2008-10-10 Thread Kevin Kofler
Mail Lists  sapience.com> writes:
>Linus switched kernel development away from large releases (odd/even
> major numbers) with infrequent release cycles and instead switched to
> something more continuous - essentially small  rapid changes and
> frequent snapshots to stable.

This is essentially how Fedora already works.

>Would the kernel release style be suited to fedora - for much the
> same reasons possibly. They seem to manage getting big changes in there
> too. And it would be in spirit with the bleeding edge of we desire in
> fedora.

It is, in fact Fedora is already using it. ;-)

>This mode would be basically always updating and never/seldom
> installing ..

Nothing prevents you to update from one Fedora release to the next. It can even 
be done with yum (or apt or smart if that's what you fancy, and zypper coming 
soon as yet another option).

> perhaps by some measure the rawhide to stable is similar
> .. but there are definite differences. As rawhide is not merged into
> stable ..

Stable releases are cut from Rawhide at regular points in time (and frequent - 
6 months is about the shortest cycle which makes sense for a distribution!) 
just like the kernel does it. And we do also backport bugfixes from Rawhide to 
the stable releases, that's what updates are for. In fact, we even sometimes 
backport new features, which is something the kernel doesn't do.

What you seem to implicitly suggest is a "rolling release" model, but that's 
not how the kernel works, in fact we're closer to it than the kernel (because 
we often push out new features to the stable releases). If you really want 
a "rolling release", then just use Rawhide, because that's what it is. But then 
you get to keep the pieces. ;-) There's no way to do development without 
occasionally breaking something, you have to give us time to stabilize things 
for a release.

> so our current method seems to resemble the older kernel
> development approach.

I don't see how that follows at all. The older kernel approach was closer to 
how RHEL works, not Fedora. (You can compare Fedora with 2.5 and RHEL with 2.4, 
a new RHEL release is like a new kernel release was at the time.)

Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: New Konqueror 4.1 Problem - button icons not displayed.

2008-10-10 Thread Kevin Kofler
Alex Makhlin  gmail.com> writes:
> If you like it then keep using it but don't ask questions when it breaks!!

If it breaks, I just fix it. ;-)
See e.g.:
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/kdelibs/F-9/kdelibs-4.1.1-kde%23157789.patch?hideattic=0&revision=1.2&view=markup
http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=862491
http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=862489
(That's my fix for "Stop Animations" not working, in Fedora's KDE 4.1.1, 
upstream KDE 4.1.2 and 4.2.)

Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: New Konqueror 4.1 Problem - button icons not displayed.

2008-10-10 Thread Kevin Kofler
Dave Feustel  mindspring.com> writes:
> All icons and at least some, if not all, images on the web page being
> displayed. In particular, the icons for the CONTINUE, PROCEED TO CHECKOUT,
> PLACE ORDER buttons. There is no problem with any icons in the toolbars.

Is the HTTPS page trying to load images over unsecured HTTP? If so, that might 
be what Konqueror doesn't like.

Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: DHCP will not grab ip.

2008-10-10 Thread Dave Feustel
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 03:41:29PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Dave Feustel wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 12:32:49PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>>> Dave Feustel wrote:
 On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 10:20:17PM +0100, Laura Speck wrote:
 I have F9 running on a computer with just one nic. Everything worked
 until about a week ago, when the nic suddenly no longer automatically
 got a dhcp address. My work around is to run dhclient etho &. DHCP
 connects then. I still haven't figured out why this happened or what
 the correct fix is.

>>> I had a thread going about the recent "enhancement" to 
>>> NetworkManager. After applying that both my hardwire and wireless 
>>> NICs stopped working. Did you by any chance "upgrade" your packages 
>>> recently, say about the time everything stopped working? Mine worked 
>>> after the upgrade until the next reboot, then went away forever. I 
>>> tried to force a downgrade, but rpm was designed to work in one 
>>> direction only, there's no way to tell rpm or yum to roll back and 
>>> rollback all the dependencies at the same time.
>>
>> Unfortunately, I don't remember any details except that, as you noted,
>> no network connection was established at system powerup one morning.
>>
>>> I gave up, I removed NM totally and completely, and now do the whole  
>>> setup with a script run at boot time.
>>
>> All I have do to get connectivity is run dhclient as root.
>>
> Interesting. I run iwconfig to set the essid, channel, and key. Then 

What are essid, channel, and key, and what do they do?

> dhclient. Previously NM had all the info except the channel, and figured 
> that out in "Managed" mode. After it stopped working I tried "Ad-hic" as 
> well, so I could set the channel. Made no difference.
>
> -- 
> Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: command error redirection

2008-10-10 Thread Bill Davidsen

Gopal Ghosh wrote:

Dear All,
How top redirect errors of a command to a file


There are three useful things to do:
1 - redirect only stderr (fd 2)
command 2>file.err
2 - redirect stdout and stderr to a file
command &>file.log
3 - use the script command to capture ALL output
(generally better than option 2)
script file.log
# you are now in a sub-shell
{run your command}
exit
# here you are back to the login shell

See the man page for the script command, you can append to a log as well, and 
you get start and stop times in the log, useful when you read it a week later. ;-)


--
Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: kernel development approach for fedora

2008-10-10 Thread Rahul Sundaram

Mail Lists wrote:

   While that is true, the argument goes that large periodic releases
has drawbacks too - and the kernel seems to be do pretty well with its
approach ... I still wonder whether the kernel way may work for fedora ..
  
Linux kernel development model is pretty unique and very distributed. It 
can't be readily compare to any other project. There are several 
different parallel branches - linux-mm, linux-next, linux-staging etc 
that feeds into the Linus branch.  New releases come out every 3 months 
or so. There is a initial week merge period followed by a stabilization 
period. Even with the short release cycle, the number of patches is 
exceptionally high.  The nature of development for distributions is 
primarily to act as a integration point for upstream projects. I doubt 
it will work well for Fedora.


Rahul

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: kernel development approach for fedora

2008-10-10 Thread Mail Lists
On 10/10/2008 03:49 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Mail Lists wrote:
>>
>>   In this new mode we would have only  2 streams -  current development
>> and stable.

> There are a few distributions that do this - Gentoo, Arch etc. Each has
> it's advantages and disadvantages. One of the problems of rolling
> release model distributions in a mass scale is that, it is pretty
> difficult to stabilize even to a nominal level.
> 
> Rahul
> 

   While that is true, the argument goes that large periodic releases
has drawbacks too - and the kernel seems to be do pretty well with its
approach ... I still wonder whether the kernel way may work for fedora ..

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Where is the F-10 release schedule?

2008-10-10 Thread Trapper

Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:

The wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Schedule
is not informative.  Am I looking in the wrong place?

Thanks - jon



Maybe??

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/10/Schedule

Trapper

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: New Konqueror 4.1 Problem - button icons not displayed.

2008-10-10 Thread Dave Feustel
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 04:17:08PM +, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Dave Feustel  mindspring.com> writes:
> > Konqueror 4.1.1 stops displaying icons in https mode. This happens
> > consistently at Amazon.com in Konqueror, but not in Firefox.
> > This problem first showed up at amazon.de, but has now spread
> > to amazon.com as well. It shows up when I am placing orders
> > for books.
> 
> What icons? Toolbar icons? Or icons on the website?

All icons and at least some, if not all, images on the web page being
displayed. In particular, the icons for the CONTINUE, PROCEED TO CHECKOUT, 
PLACE ORDER
buttons. There is no problem with any icons in the toolbars.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: DHCP will not grab ip.

2008-10-10 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Dave Feustel wrote:
>>> I gave up, I removed NM totally and completely, and now do the whole
>>> setup with a script run at boot time.
>>
>> All I have do to get connectivity is run dhclient as root.
>>
In the past, I have configured the wireless interface for use with
the network service. You just add the information to the ifconfig
file for the interface. (And change your service configuration so
network runs instead of Network Manager.)

> Interesting. I run iwconfig to set the essid, channel, and key. Then
> dhclient. Previously NM had all the info except the channel, and figured
> that out in "Managed" mode. After it stopped working I tried "Ad-hic" as
> well, so I could set the channel. Made no difference.

One thing that may make a difference is to add restricted to the key
setting string.

iwconfig wlan0 key restricted 

I know with the way I have my router configured, you can not get an
IP address unless you have the key and the restricted option. (Now
if only some of the things connected were not limited to WEP so I
could convert it to WPA.)

Mikkel
-- 

  Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: command error redirection

2008-10-10 Thread Phil Meyer

Gopal Ghosh wrote:

Dear All,
How top redirect errors of a command to a file
Thanks
Regards



A bit of background is useful in learning, and remembering how to 
manipulate the command line.


There is a new, and pretty good summary of command line goodness, and 
what it all means,  including your specific question, here:


http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/aix/library/au-spunix_clitricks/?ca=dgr-lnxw09SpeakUnix&S_TACT=105AGX59&s_cmp=GRsitelnxw09

Good Luck!

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: kernel development approach for fedora

2008-10-10 Thread Rahul Sundaram

Mail Lists wrote:


  In this new mode we would have only  2 streams -  current development
and stable.

  Current development targets remerging every few weeks into stable ..
quite different than current rawhide and patching f8/f9 and the next big
bang release is f10 etc.

   Google back in lkml for Linus and others thoughts about the different
approaches - i'm just asking if his approach may also be a good model at
the distro level. Rawhide is not the same at all.


What you are describing in the "rolling release" model instead of the 
branch of release model. Kernel development isn't exactly that due to 
it's very distributed nature with many different parallel branches.


There are a few distributions that do this - Gentoo, Arch etc. Each has 
it's advantages and disadvantages. One of the problems of rolling 
release model distributions in a mass scale is that, it is pretty 
difficult to stabilize even to a nominal level.


Rahul

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: kernel development approach for fedora

2008-10-10 Thread Mail Lists
On 10/10/2008 02:30 PM, Chris Snook wrote:
> Mail Lists wrote:
>>Linus switched kernel development away from large releases (odd/even
>> major numbers) with infrequent release cycles and instead switched to
>> something more continuous - essentially small  rapid changes and
>> frequent snapshots to stable.
>>
>>Would the kernel release style be suited to fedora - for much the
>> same reasons possibly. They seem to manage getting big changes in there
>> too. And it would be in spirit with the bleeding edge of we desire in
>> fedora.
>>
>>This mode would be basically always updating and never/seldom
>> installing .. perhaps by some measure the rawhide to stable is similar
>> .. but there are definite differences. As rawhide is not merged into
>> stable ..so our current method seems to resemble the older kernel
>> development approach.
>>
>>Curious what others think
> 
> We regularly rebase packages, including the kernel, to new upstream
> versions after a release, but we do this only after they've received
> significant testing exposure in rawhide and updates-testing.  If you
> want the bleeding-edge packages, just enable the rawhide repository by
> default and pray that nothing breaks.
> 
> -- Chris
> 

  In this new mode we would have only  2 streams -  current development
and stable.

  Current development targets remerging every few weeks into stable ..
quite different than current rawhide and patching f8/f9 and the next big
bang release is f10 etc.

   Google back in lkml for Linus and others thoughts about the different
approaches - i'm just asking if his approach may also be a good model at
the distro level. Rawhide is not the same at all.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: DHCP will not grab ip.

2008-10-10 Thread Bill Davidsen

Dave Feustel wrote:

On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 12:32:49PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:

Dave Feustel wrote:

On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 10:20:17PM +0100, Laura Speck wrote:
I have F9 running on a computer with just one nic. Everything worked
until about a week ago, when the nic suddenly no longer automatically
got a dhcp address. My work around is to run dhclient etho &. DHCP
connects then. I still haven't figured out why this happened or what
the correct fix is.

I had a thread going about the recent "enhancement" to NetworkManager. 
After applying that both my hardwire and wireless NICs stopped working. 
Did you by any chance "upgrade" your packages recently, say about the 
time everything stopped working? Mine worked after the upgrade until the 
next reboot, then went away forever. I tried to force a downgrade, but 
rpm was designed to work in one direction only, there's no way to tell 
rpm or yum to roll back and rollback all the dependencies at the same 
time.


Unfortunately, I don't remember any details except that, as you noted,
no network connection was established at system powerup one morning.

I gave up, I removed NM totally and completely, and now do the whole 
setup with a script run at boot time.


All I have do to get connectivity is run dhclient as root.

Interesting. I run iwconfig to set the essid, channel, and key. Then dhclient. 
Previously NM had all the info except the channel, and figured that out in 
"Managed" mode. After it stopped working I tried "Ad-hic" as well, so I could 
set the channel. Made no difference.


--
Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: F10 and picasa (on F9 too)

2008-10-10 Thread lux
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 4:25 AM, Marcelo M. Garcia <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi
>
> I installed Picasa using the a Google repo. When I try to search, appears a
> message saying that Google-testing is invalid:
> Bad id for repo: google testing, byte =   6
>
> The repo was defined as described in
> http://www.google.com/linuxrepositories/testrepo.html
>
> And Picasa itself is not starting: I receive the following message:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ picasa
> /usr/bin/picasa: line 139: 24613 Segmentation fault "$PIC_BINDIR"/wrapper
> check_dir.exe.so
> /usr/bin/picasa: line 175: 24716 Segmentation fault "$PIC_BINDIR/wrapper"
> regedit /E $registry_export
> HKEY_USERS\\S-1-5-4\\Software\\Google\\Picasa\\Picasa2\\Preferences\\
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$
>

Identical problem on F9 (2.6.26.5-45.fc9.i686)
picasa-2.7.3736-15.i386
the errors are:

wine-pthread[9526]: segfault at 118280 ip 00118280 sp bf936430 error 4
wine-pthread[9769]: segfault at 118280 ip 00118280 sp bffb8af0 error 4
wine-pthread[9780]: segfault at 118280 ip 00118280 sp bfd43880 error 4
wine-pthread[9789]: segfault at 118280 ip 00118280 sp bfc847c0 error 4
wine-pthread[9798]: segfault at 118280 ip 00118280 sp bffbd2c0 error 4
wine-pthread[9691]: segfault at 118280 ip 00118280 sp bffd7310 error 4
wine-pthread[9899]: segfault at 118280 ip 00118280 sp bfad75e0 error 4
wine-pthread[9805]: segfault at 118280 ip 00118280 sp bfef1260 error 4

Funy thing is
picasa can run as a root user

I follwoed some tip to set

vm.mmap_min_addr = 0

in /etc/sysctl.conf
hope some offer a fix






>
> Thanks
>
> Marcelo
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> Guidelines:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
>
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: Where is the F-10 release schedule?

2008-10-10 Thread Rahul Sundaram

bob smith wrote:
looks like the team is shooting for nov, 08, if you look at the 
schedule, but

I am not sure what the GA means - might be generally available or
it might be guess again
hope this helps!
bob


It means the former as explained in the page itself. I have edited to 
expand the abbreviation to avoid any confusion.


Rahul

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Where is the F-10 release schedule?

2008-10-10 Thread Mike
bob smith  verizon.net> writes:

> looks like the team is shooting for nov, 08, if you
> look at the schedule, but

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/10/Schedule

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Where is the F-10 release schedule?

2008-10-10 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:47:20 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jonathan Ryshpan) wrote:

> The wiki page:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Schedule
> is not informative.  Am I looking in the wrong place?

Try: 

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/10/Schedule

For the more detailed schedule for F10. 

> Thanks - jon

kevin



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: Where is the F-10 release schedule?

2008-10-10 Thread Rahul Sundaram

Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:

The wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Schedule
is not informative.  Am I looking in the wrong place?


You seem to have missed the link from that page to

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/10/Schedule

Rahul

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Where is the F-10 release schedule?

2008-10-10 Thread bob smith
looks like the team is shooting for nov, 08, if you look at the 
schedule, but

I am not sure what the GA means - might be generally available or
it might be guess again
hope this helps!
bob

Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:

The wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Schedule
is not informative.  Am I looking in the wrong place?

Thanks - jon


  


--
===
Don't let the past remind us of what we are not now. CSN -Suite for..

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Where is the F-10 release schedule?

2008-10-10 Thread Jonathan Ryshpan
The wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Schedule
is not informative.  Am I looking in the wrong place?

Thanks - jon


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: kernel development approach for fedora

2008-10-10 Thread Chris Snook

Mail Lists wrote:

   Linus switched kernel development away from large releases (odd/even
major numbers) with infrequent release cycles and instead switched to
something more continuous - essentially small  rapid changes and
frequent snapshots to stable.

   Would the kernel release style be suited to fedora - for much the
same reasons possibly. They seem to manage getting big changes in there
too. And it would be in spirit with the bleeding edge of we desire in
fedora.

   This mode would be basically always updating and never/seldom
installing .. perhaps by some measure the rawhide to stable is similar
.. but there are definite differences. As rawhide is not merged into
stable ..so our current method seems to resemble the older kernel
development approach.

   Curious what others think


We regularly rebase packages, including the kernel, to new upstream 
versions after a release, but we do this only after they've received 
significant testing exposure in rawhide and updates-testing.  If you 
want the bleeding-edge packages, just enable the rawhide repository by 
default and pray that nothing breaks.


-- Chris

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: mounted media icon on desktop, missed, F9

2008-10-10 Thread lux
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 10:12 +1100, lux wrote:
> > After moved to F9, the mounted media icon, eg, USB disk, are not
> > appearing on desktop. why?
>
> They are here...  Tell the list whether you're using Gnome, KDE, or
> something else.
>

I use Gnome and F9 kernel is

2.6.26.5-45.fc9.i686



>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -r
> 2.6.26.5-45.fc9.i686
>
> Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
> read messages from the public lists.
>
>
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> Guidelines:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
>
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: open-office ignores font subpixel smoothing

2008-10-10 Thread David Hláčik
Sorry guys, please ignore this question. It was mine mistake - i am using
unofficial cairo with ubuntu patches and there was some fix to enable
hinting to qt4 apps. Thats it.

Regards,

D.

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 7:06 PM, David Hláčik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hello guys,
>
> I have Fedora 9 with Subpixel smoothing option for fonts enabled in gnome
> fonts settings. Hinting set to slight.
> It works just fine, except under OpenOffice. It seems to use Full Hinting.
> How it is possible?
> I did removed .openoffice folder from my home folder.
>
> Thanks!
>
> David
>
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

open-office ignores font subpixel smoothing

2008-10-10 Thread David Hláčik
Hello guys,

I have Fedora 9 with Subpixel smoothing option for fonts enabled in gnome
fonts settings. Hinting set to slight.
It works just fine, except under OpenOffice. It seems to use Full Hinting.
How it is possible?
I did removed .openoffice folder from my home folder.

Thanks!

David
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: New Konqueror 4.1 Problem - button icons not displayed.

2008-10-10 Thread ANOOP
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Kevin Kofler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alex Makhlin  gmail.com> writes:
>> Why are you using Konqueror? Its a horrible web browser!! Firefox if
>> installed correctly is far better.
>
> I use Konqueror all the time and strongly disagree with that flame.
I am a KDE fan and always want to use konqueror. But some websites
doesn't open in it. I use gmail a lot, but konqueror doesn't open it
properly specially labels, Due to this I need to switch back to
Firefox.

Thanks,
Anoop

>
>Kevin Kofler
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
>

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: command error redirection

2008-10-10 Thread Rick Stevens

Simon Andrews wrote:

ANOOP wrote:

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Gopal Ghosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Dear All,
How top redirect errors of a command to a file


#  > errorFile


That would redirect stdout (normal output) rather than the errors.  To 
redirect standard error you'd usually do:


#  2> errorfile

..assuming you're using bash for your shell.


To capture all output, use

command >/path/to/file 2>&1

which redirects both stdout and stderr to /path/to/file.
--
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer  [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
- AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 22643734Yahoo: origrps2 -
--
-   I haven't lost my mind.  It's backed up on tape somewhere, but   -
-   probably not recoverable.-
--

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: New Konqueror 4.1 Problem - button icons not displayed.

2008-10-10 Thread Alex Makhlin

Kevin Kofler wrote:

Alex Makhlin  gmail.com> writes:
  
Why are you using Konqueror? Its a horrible web browser!! Firefox if 
installed correctly is far better.



I use Konqueror all the time and strongly disagree with that flame.

Kevin Kofler

  
I'm sorry if I upset you, that was not my intention. I personally find 
Konqueror a very bad we browser. I have also used it and r is 
what I found. If you like it then keep using it but don't ask questions 
when it breaks!!


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: New Konqueror 4.1 Problem - button icons not displayed.

2008-10-10 Thread Kevin Kofler
Dave Feustel  mindspring.com> writes:
> Konqueror 4.1.1 stops displaying icons in https mode. This happens
> consistently at Amazon.com in Konqueror, but not in Firefox.
> This problem first showed up at amazon.de, but has now spread
> to amazon.com as well. It shows up when I am placing orders
> for books.

What icons? Toolbar icons? Or icons on the website?

Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: New Konqueror 4.1 Problem - button icons not displayed.

2008-10-10 Thread Kevin Kofler
Alex Makhlin  gmail.com> writes:
> Why are you using Konqueror? Its a horrible web browser!! Firefox if 
> installed correctly is far better.

I use Konqueror all the time and strongly disagree with that flame.

Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


kernel development approach for fedora

2008-10-10 Thread Mail Lists

   Linus switched kernel development away from large releases (odd/even
major numbers) with infrequent release cycles and instead switched to
something more continuous - essentially small  rapid changes and
frequent snapshots to stable.

   Would the kernel release style be suited to fedora - for much the
same reasons possibly. They seem to manage getting big changes in there
too. And it would be in spirit with the bleeding edge of we desire in
fedora.

   This mode would be basically always updating and never/seldom
installing .. perhaps by some measure the rawhide to stable is similar
.. but there are definite differences. As rawhide is not merged into
stable ..so our current method seems to resemble the older kernel
development approach.

   Curious what others think

 gene/


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: kaddressbook + openldap

2008-10-10 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 11:26 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> 
> >> I use dovecot IMAP to keep email on one machine,
> >> and basically would like to extend this to distribution lists.
> > 
> > This is where you lose me. I can understand wanting to define a list as
> > the result of an LDAP query (rather than having to enumerate all the
> > members) but you can do that via your MTA. For example we have public
> > IMAP lists defined for "all students", "all faculty" and so on, by
> > tweaking our Postfix config. I don't know much about Dovecot but I
> > imagine it can also do this. Involving a mail client just seems to be
> > the wrong way to go about it.
> 
> I'm not sure what you mean by an IMAP list?
> I don't see any facility in dovecot to create lists.
> (Nb I'm almost completely ignorant of dovecot/IMAP.)

My bad. I was stupidly forgetting that Dovecot is an IMAP server, not an
MTA. I should have said you can configure your MTA to do this (as we did
with Postfix).

> Actually, I found it was only moderately painful
> to create kaddressbook distribution lists
> from an LDAP address book.
> Basically, I listed all the entries in the book in kaddressbook.
> This lists the "o" attribute, which I use for distinguishing entries,
> and one can go through the list marking entries
> with Shift-Left Button, and then add all the marked entries
> to a specified distribution list.
> 
> I know I could - probably should - have used something like mailman.
> But I'm rather taken with the idea of keeping all information
> in an LDAP directory on one machine, 
> which can be accessed over the web.

Going back to my original point, this is fine as far as it goes, but you
lose the funcionality of a list manager (e.g. users can
subscribe/unsubscribe, moderation, digests, password reminders etc.).
Anyway, horses for courses.

Cheers

poc

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: gimp 2.6 for F8?

2008-10-10 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 23:48 -0800, Kam Leo wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 8:40 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 00:16 -0400, oleksandr korneta wrote:
> >> In case you have a
> >> local *.rpm with unsatisfied dependencies on your system, installing
> >> this rpm through "smart install" will make smart pull all of those
> >> from
> >> the repositories on the fly (provided they are available there),
> >> instead
> >> of spitting the angry error messages into STDOUT like "rpm -ivh" does.
> >
> > "yum localinstall .rpm" will also do this.
> >
> > poc
> >
> 
> You're missing the point with the yum example. The dependency(ies) are
> also local files. I don't believe that yum will search the local
> directory and pull in the additional packages. It would have to be
> "yum localinstall package1.rpm package2.rpm ..." in order to pick up
> the dependencies.

Well, I was replying to the message I cited, which mentions repos, not
local files.

poc

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: What does kernel 2.6.27 bring for Artheros AR5007 users?

2008-10-10 Thread Jim

Jim wrote:

Arthur Pemberton wrote:

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 

Arthur Pemberton wrote:
   

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 8:29 AM, Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

 

Arthur Pemberton wrote:

   

The ath_pci driver is very falky on a notebook on which I installed
Fedora + Livna. I was expecting that ath5k in 2.6.27 would bring
AR5007 support, but I saw nothing about it here:
http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_2_6_27

How are other Fedora dealing with the AR5007 wifi card?



  
I'm using a eeepc with the AR5007EG wifi and kernels-2.6.27 in 
FC10 work

great.



What did you use before 2.6.27?

  
The madwifi-nr-r3366+ar5007.tar.gz driver, but I'm sure it's changed 
to a

different number by now.
While I was using FC9 , I went to Redhat Rawhide and got a 
Kernel-2.6.27 and

installed on FC9 and it worked
without any problems.
I'm using kernel-2.6.27-0.398.rc9.fc10.i686, If you should choose to 
go that
way, be sure you get the kernel-devel, kernel-headers,  from 
rawhide, just

in case you should have to compile anything.
I switch to FC10-test because they have a lot of improvements to KDE.
The 2.6.27 kernels have fixes for most or all Atheros chipsets, it also
fixed my Webcam
So I have got a  eeePC 702, with all hardware working in FC10.
Send me your Email and I will attach an forward  the
madwifi-nr-r3366+ar5007.tar.gz driver to you. I still have it on my PC.




No need for the attachment, I have that madwifi via Livna (RPM)  and
its 'ok' but is very flaky. It either doesn't resume after suspend, or
stalls the machine on suspend. And randomly doesn't work on some
boots.

I was going to pull in .27 from rawhide, but I saw it was pulling in
some packages for update which I was not familiar with so I aborted
that process. May have to give it a try again.


  

Do you use Yumex ?
Yumex will let you select only the packages you want.
The only packages that the kernel should want to pull are  
kernel-devel, kernel-headers, kernel-firmware, kernel-oops .

Here is a mirror you can download the packages you want, one at a time.

ftp://mirror.hiwaay.net/pub/fedora/linux/releases/test/10-Beta/Fedora/i386/os/Packages/ 

Arthur if you have problems with running that URL, do a right click on 
URL and "Save Link Target" and paste it in the URL box on your Web 
browser, I tried to click on link on FC8-Thunderbird and it wouldn't run 
because it was a "ftp" site.


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: What does kernel 2.6.27 bring for Artheros AR5007 users?

2008-10-10 Thread Jim

Arthur Pemberton wrote:

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  

Arthur Pemberton wrote:


On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 8:29 AM, Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

  

Arthur Pemberton wrote:



The ath_pci driver is very falky on a notebook on which I installed
Fedora + Livna. I was expecting that ath5k in 2.6.27 would bring
AR5007 support, but I saw nothing about it here:
http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_2_6_27

How are other Fedora dealing with the AR5007 wifi card?



  

I'm using a eeepc with the AR5007EG wifi and kernels-2.6.27 in FC10 work
great.



What did you use before 2.6.27?

  

The madwifi-nr-r3366+ar5007.tar.gz driver, but I'm sure it's changed to a
different number by now.
While I was using FC9 , I went to Redhat Rawhide and got a Kernel-2.6.27 and
installed on FC9 and it worked
without any problems.
I'm using kernel-2.6.27-0.398.rc9.fc10.i686, If you should choose to go that
way, be sure you get the kernel-devel, kernel-headers,  from rawhide, just
in case you should have to compile anything.
I switch to FC10-test because they have a lot of improvements to KDE.
The 2.6.27 kernels have fixes for most or all Atheros chipsets, it also
fixed my Webcam
So I have got a  eeePC 702, with all hardware working in FC10.
Send me your Email and I will attach an forward  the
madwifi-nr-r3366+ar5007.tar.gz driver to you. I still have it on my PC.




No need for the attachment, I have that madwifi via Livna (RPM)  and
its 'ok' but is very flaky. It either doesn't resume after suspend, or
stalls the machine on suspend. And randomly doesn't work on some
boots.

I was going to pull in .27 from rawhide, but I saw it was pulling in
some packages for update which I was not familiar with so I aborted
that process. May have to give it a try again.


  

Do you use Yumex ?
Yumex will let you select only the packages you want.
The only packages that the kernel should want to pull are  kernel-devel, 
kernel-headers, kernel-firmware, kernel-oops .

Here is a mirror you can download the packages you want, one at a time.

ftp://mirror.hiwaay.net/pub/fedora/linux/releases/test/10-Beta/Fedora/i386/os/Packages/

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: What does kernel 2.6.27 bring for Artheros AR5007 users?

2008-10-10 Thread Arthur Pemberton
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 8:29 AM, Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>>>

 The ath_pci driver is very falky on a notebook on which I installed
 Fedora + Livna. I was expecting that ath5k in 2.6.27 would bring
 AR5007 support, but I saw nothing about it here:
 http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_2_6_27

 How are other Fedora dealing with the AR5007 wifi card?



>>>
>>> I'm using a eeepc with the AR5007EG wifi and kernels-2.6.27 in FC10 work
>>> great.
>>>
>>
>>
>> What did you use before 2.6.27?
>>
>
> The madwifi-nr-r3366+ar5007.tar.gz driver, but I'm sure it's changed to a
> different number by now.
> While I was using FC9 , I went to Redhat Rawhide and got a Kernel-2.6.27 and
> installed on FC9 and it worked
> without any problems.
> I'm using kernel-2.6.27-0.398.rc9.fc10.i686, If you should choose to go that
> way, be sure you get the kernel-devel, kernel-headers,  from rawhide, just
> in case you should have to compile anything.
> I switch to FC10-test because they have a lot of improvements to KDE.
> The 2.6.27 kernels have fixes for most or all Atheros chipsets, it also
> fixed my Webcam
> So I have got a  eeePC 702, with all hardware working in FC10.
> Send me your Email and I will attach an forward  the
> madwifi-nr-r3366+ar5007.tar.gz driver to you. I still have it on my PC.


No need for the attachment, I have that madwifi via Livna (RPM)  and
its 'ok' but is very flaky. It either doesn't resume after suspend, or
stalls the machine on suspend. And randomly doesn't work on some
boots.

I was going to pull in .27 from rawhide, but I saw it was pulling in
some packages for update which I was not familiar with so I aborted
that process. May have to give it a try again.


-- 
Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
( www.pembo13.com )

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: New Konqueror 4.1 Problem - button icons not displayed.

2008-10-10 Thread Alex Makhlin

Dave Feustel wrote:

Konqueror 4.1.1 stops displaying icons in https mode. This happens
consistently at Amazon.com in Konqueror, but not in Firefox.
This problem first showed up at amazon.de, but has now spread
to amazon.com as well. It shows up when I am placing orders
for books.

  
Why are you using Konqueror? Its a horrible web browser!! Firefox if 
installed correctly is far better.


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: What does kernel 2.6.27 bring for Artheros AR5007 users?

2008-10-10 Thread Jim

Arthur Pemberton wrote:

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 8:29 AM, Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  

Arthur Pemberton wrote:


The ath_pci driver is very falky on a notebook on which I installed
Fedora + Livna. I was expecting that ath5k in 2.6.27 would bring
AR5007 support, but I saw nothing about it here:
http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_2_6_27

How are other Fedora dealing with the AR5007 wifi card?


  

I'm using a eeepc with the AR5007EG wifi and kernels-2.6.27 in FC10 work
great.




What did you use before 2.6.27?
  


The madwifi-nr-r3366+ar5007.tar.gz driver, but I'm sure it's changed to 
a different number by now.
While I was using FC9 , I went to Redhat Rawhide and got a Kernel-2.6.27 
and installed on FC9 and it worked

without any problems.
I'm using kernel-2.6.27-0.398.rc9.fc10.i686, If you should choose to go 
that way, be sure you get the kernel-devel, kernel-headers,  from 
rawhide, just in case you should have to compile anything.

I switch to FC10-test because they have a lot of improvements to KDE.
The 2.6.27 kernels have fixes for most or all Atheros chipsets, it also 
fixed my Webcam

So I have got a  eeePC 702, with all hardware working in FC10.
Send me your Email and I will attach an forward  the 
madwifi-nr-r3366+ar5007.tar.gz driver to you. I still have it on my PC.


[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Hardware Raid Expansion and LVM

2008-10-10 Thread Seann Clark

Roberto Ragusa wrote:

Seann Clark wrote:
  

   I am looking for a little help on finding out the best way to do
this. I had a 4 disk 1.4TB RAID 5 array, and extended that to an 8 disk
3.18TB array, on a 64 bit system.The Raid card handled the migration of
the disks well, and everything on that side is up and running as it
should. Problem is I don't know how to extend LVM to a larger size,
without doing the whole adding of physical drives, and so forth, and the
pv display doesn't show more than the 1.4TB that I started with. Most
documentation details software RAID procedures that don't really work
with this. I figure I am doing something(lots of things) wrong.



Have a look at the thread called "lvm resizing and shifting" (23/8/2008).
The issue is similar and my proposal worked in that case.
Your problem is that you have a 3TB disk (sdb) containing just
a 1.4TB partition (sdb1, which is your pv).
  
I will check out that thread, that should be pretty interesting of a 
read, I had to have missed it when I was reviewing the list email.

I obviously have to recommend to be very careful when doing these
operations. You have a backup of your data, right?
  
I don't have a backup for this server right now, so I will be getting 
that ready to start working (I hope) on this system. My problem is that 
I have 1.2TB of this filled.

I'm also a bit concerned about the fact that you will break the 2TB
per partition barrier; I don't know if that limit has been totally
removed nowadays.

  
Is the 2TB issue still in place for ext3 filesystems in 64bit? I am not 
sure, I don't really see mention of this so I might have missed it. If 
that is the case, I will just set my controller to autocarve and set up 
two partitions for this.It shouldn't be a problem with the hardware RAID

Alternatively, you can add a sdb2 and then pvcreate, vgextend, lvextend.

  

Oct  9 11:58:39 haruhi kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 20971519 512-byte
hardware sectors (10737 MB)
Oct  9 11:58:39 haruhi kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
Oct  9 11:58:39 haruhi kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled,
read cache: disabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
Oct  9 11:58:39 haruhi kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 20971519 512-byte
hardware sectors (10737 MB)
Oct  9 11:58:39 haruhi kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
Oct  9 11:58:39 haruhi kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled,
read cache: disabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
Oct  9 11:58:39 haruhi kernel: sda: sda1 sda2
Oct  9 11:58:39 haruhi kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk
Oct  9 11:58:39 haruhi kernel: sd 0:0:0:1: [sdb] Very big device. Trying
to use READ CAPACITY(16).
Oct  9 11:58:39 haruhi kernel: sd 0:0:0:1: [sdb] 6814820353 512-byte
hardware sectors (3489188 MB)
Oct  9 11:58:39 haruhi kernel: sd 0:0:0:1: [sdb] Write Protect is off
Oct  9 11:58:39 haruhi kernel: sd 0:0:0:1: [sdb] Write cache: enabled,
read cache: disabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
Oct  9 11:58:39 haruhi kernel: sd 0:0:0:1: [sdb] Very big device. Trying
to use READ CAPACITY(16).
Oct  9 11:58:39 haruhi kernel: sd 0:0:0:1: [sdb] 6814820353 512-byte
hardware sectors (3489188 MB)
Oct  9 11:58:39 haruhi kernel: sd 0:0:0:1: [sdb] Write Protect is off
Oct  9 11:58:39 haruhi kernel: sd 0:0:0:1: [sdb] Write cache: enabled,
read cache: disabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA



The important information is just the line you have not included
(sdb: sdb1, sdb2?).
What about /proc/partitions?

The drive in question is sdb(1)
What is in /proc/partitions:

major minor  #blocks  name

  8 0   10485759 sda
  8 1 200781 sda1
  8 2   10281600 sda2
  816 3407410176 sdb
  817 1454324256 sdb1
253 0 1462468608 dm-0
253 12031616 dm-1

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: What does kernel 2.6.27 bring for Artheros AR5007 users?

2008-10-10 Thread Arthur Pemberton
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 8:29 AM, Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>>
>> The ath_pci driver is very falky on a notebook on which I installed
>> Fedora + Livna. I was expecting that ath5k in 2.6.27 would bring
>> AR5007 support, but I saw nothing about it here:
>> http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_2_6_27
>>
>> How are other Fedora dealing with the AR5007 wifi card?
>>
>>
>
> I'm using a eeepc with the AR5007EG wifi and kernels-2.6.27 in FC10 work
> great.


What did you use before 2.6.27?

-- 
Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
( www.pembo13.com )

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: What does kernel 2.6.27 bring for Artheros AR5007 users?

2008-10-10 Thread Jim

Arthur Pemberton wrote:

The ath_pci driver is very falky on a notebook on which I installed
Fedora + Livna. I was expecting that ath5k in 2.6.27 would bring
AR5007 support, but I saw nothing about it here:
http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_2_6_27

How are other Fedora dealing with the AR5007 wifi card?

  
I'm using a eeepc with the AR5007EG wifi and kernels-2.6.27 in FC10 work 
great.


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: gimp 2.6 for F8?

2008-10-10 Thread oleksandr korneta

on 10/10/2008 03:52 AM Kam Leo wrote:

On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 00:16 -0400, oleksandr korneta wrote:

but smart has the advantage which I like. In case you have a
local *.rpm with unsatisfied dependencies on your system, installing
this rpm through "smart install" will make smart pull all of those
from the repositories on the fly (provided they are available there),
instead of spitting the angry error messages into STDOUT like "rpm
-ivh" does.

I'll point out that yum can do that, too.

e.g. "yum localinstall httpd" would install that local file, and
should pull in any dependencies, automatically.

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -r
2.6.26.5-45.fc9.i686


That works only if a yum repository contains the dependency. In this
instance the packages are not in a repository but were downloaded into
a local directory.

 guys, don't argue. The takehome message is that both yum and smart 
have  an advantage over "rpm -ivh" :)


But I like smart more, it is faster on my machine.

--
regards,
Oleksandr Korneta

I'm running F9 x86_64 and F8 i386 on x86_64 hardware, should this matter.

/The nice thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from./


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: command error redirection

2008-10-10 Thread ANOOP
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Simon Andrews
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ANOOP wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Gopal Ghosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear All,
>>> How top redirect errors of a command to a file
>>
>> #  > errorFile
>
> That would redirect stdout (normal output) rather than the errors.  To
> redirect standard error you'd usually do:
>
> #  2> errorfile
>
> ..assuming you're using bash for your shell.
Thanks Simon

>
> Simon.
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
>

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: command error redirection

2008-10-10 Thread Simon Andrews

ANOOP wrote:

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Gopal Ghosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Dear All,
How top redirect errors of a command to a file


#  > errorFile


That would redirect stdout (normal output) rather than the errors.  To 
redirect standard error you'd usually do:


#  2> errorfile

..assuming you're using bash for your shell.

Simon.

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: command error redirection

2008-10-10 Thread ANOOP
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Gopal Ghosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear All,
> How top redirect errors of a command to a file

#  > errorFile

Thanks,
Anoop

> Thanks
> Regards
>
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
>

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


command error redirection

2008-10-10 Thread Gopal Ghosh
Dear All,
How top redirect errors of a command to a file
ThanksRegards
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: kaddressbook + openldap

2008-10-10 Thread Timothy Murphy
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

>> I use dovecot IMAP to keep email on one machine,
>> and basically would like to extend this to distribution lists.
> 
> This is where you lose me. I can understand wanting to define a list as
> the result of an LDAP query (rather than having to enumerate all the
> members) but you can do that via your MTA. For example we have public
> IMAP lists defined for "all students", "all faculty" and so on, by
> tweaking our Postfix config. I don't know much about Dovecot but I
> imagine it can also do this. Involving a mail client just seems to be
> the wrong way to go about it.

I'm not sure what you mean by an IMAP list?
I don't see any facility in dovecot to create lists.
(Nb I'm almost completely ignorant of dovecot/IMAP.)

Actually, I found it was only moderately painful
to create kaddressbook distribution lists
from an LDAP address book.
Basically, I listed all the entries in the book in kaddressbook.
This lists the "o" attribute, which I use for distinguishing entries,
and one can go through the list marking entries
with Shift-Left Button, and then add all the marked entries
to a specified distribution list.

I know I could - probably should - have used something like mailman.
But I'm rather taken with the idea of keeping all information
in an LDAP directory on one machine, 
which can be accessed over the web.


-- 
Timothy Murphy  
e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Hardware Raid Expansion and LVM

2008-10-10 Thread Roberto Ragusa
Seann Clark wrote:
> 
>I am looking for a little help on finding out the best way to do
> this. I had a 4 disk 1.4TB RAID 5 array, and extended that to an 8 disk
> 3.18TB array, on a 64 bit system.The Raid card handled the migration of
> the disks well, and everything on that side is up and running as it
> should. Problem is I don't know how to extend LVM to a larger size,
> without doing the whole adding of physical drives, and so forth, and the
> pv display doesn't show more than the 1.4TB that I started with. Most
> documentation details software RAID procedures that don't really work
> with this. I figure I am doing something(lots of things) wrong.

Have a look at the thread called "lvm resizing and shifting" (23/8/2008).
The issue is similar and my proposal worked in that case.
Your problem is that you have a 3TB disk (sdb) containing just
a 1.4TB partition (sdb1, which is your pv).

I obviously have to recommend to be very careful when doing these
operations. You have a backup of your data, right?

I'm also a bit concerned about the fact that you will break the 2TB
per partition barrier; I don't know if that limit has been totally
removed nowadays.

Alternatively, you can add a sdb2 and then pvcreate, vgextend, lvextend.

> Oct  9 11:58:39 haruhi kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 20971519 512-byte
> hardware sectors (10737 MB)
> Oct  9 11:58:39 haruhi kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
> Oct  9 11:58:39 haruhi kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled,
> read cache: disabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
> Oct  9 11:58:39 haruhi kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 20971519 512-byte
> hardware sectors (10737 MB)
> Oct  9 11:58:39 haruhi kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
> Oct  9 11:58:39 haruhi kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled,
> read cache: disabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
> Oct  9 11:58:39 haruhi kernel: sda: sda1 sda2
> Oct  9 11:58:39 haruhi kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk
> Oct  9 11:58:39 haruhi kernel: sd 0:0:0:1: [sdb] Very big device. Trying
> to use READ CAPACITY(16).
> Oct  9 11:58:39 haruhi kernel: sd 0:0:0:1: [sdb] 6814820353 512-byte
> hardware sectors (3489188 MB)
> Oct  9 11:58:39 haruhi kernel: sd 0:0:0:1: [sdb] Write Protect is off
> Oct  9 11:58:39 haruhi kernel: sd 0:0:0:1: [sdb] Write cache: enabled,
> read cache: disabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
> Oct  9 11:58:39 haruhi kernel: sd 0:0:0:1: [sdb] Very big device. Trying
> to use READ CAPACITY(16).
> Oct  9 11:58:39 haruhi kernel: sd 0:0:0:1: [sdb] 6814820353 512-byte
> hardware sectors (3489188 MB)
> Oct  9 11:58:39 haruhi kernel: sd 0:0:0:1: [sdb] Write Protect is off
> Oct  9 11:58:39 haruhi kernel: sd 0:0:0:1: [sdb] Write cache: enabled,
> read cache: disabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA

The important information is just the line you have not included
(sdb: sdb1, sdb2?).
What about /proc/partitions?

Best regards.

-- 
   Roberto Ragusamail at robertoragusa.it

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: gimp 2.6 for F8?

2008-10-10 Thread Kam Leo
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 00:16 -0400, oleksandr korneta wrote:
>> but smart has the advantage which I like. In case you have a
>> local *.rpm with unsatisfied dependencies on your system, installing
>> this rpm through "smart install" will make smart pull all of those
>> from the repositories on the fly (provided they are available there),
>> instead of spitting the angry error messages into STDOUT like "rpm
>> -ivh" does.
>
> I'll point out that yum can do that, too.
>
> e.g. "yum localinstall httpd" would install that local file, and
> should pull in any dependencies, automatically.
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -r
> 2.6.26.5-45.fc9.i686

That works only if a yum repository contains the dependency. In this
instance the packages are not in a repository but were downloaded into
a local directory.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: gimp 2.6 for F8?

2008-10-10 Thread Kam Leo
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 8:40 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 00:16 -0400, oleksandr korneta wrote:
>> In case you have a
>> local *.rpm with unsatisfied dependencies on your system, installing
>> this rpm through "smart install" will make smart pull all of those
>> from
>> the repositories on the fly (provided they are available there),
>> instead
>> of spitting the angry error messages into STDOUT like "rpm -ivh" does.
>
> "yum localinstall .rpm" will also do this.
>
> poc
>

You're missing the point with the yum example. The dependency(ies) are
also local files. I don't believe that yum will search the local
directory and pull in the additional packages. It would have to be
"yum localinstall package1.rpm package2.rpm ..." in order to pick up
the dependencies.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: amarok and cover flow on ipod nano 2nd gen

2008-10-10 Thread Gianluca Cecchi
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 12:40 AM, Gianluca Cecchi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> I have an ipod nano 2nd gen 8Gb black.
> I have set it up inside amarok and I can transfer songs/albums.
> But it seems I don't get cover flows on ipod
> amarok is 1.4.10-1.fc9.i386
> Any hints?
> After fetching covers from amazon into collection and trying to
> transfer to device the album I only get songs...
> Selecting ipod -> update artwork gives "updated artwork for 177
> tracks" but actually nothing on ipod (no covers at all)
>
> Thanks,
> Gianluca
>

It was my fault: actually the iPod was a 3rd gen Nano 8Gb black.. ;-)
After setting it correctly in amarok, coverflow arrived smoothly!
Gianluca

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: mounted media icon on desktop, missed, F9

2008-10-10 Thread ANOOP
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:42 AM, lux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After moved to F9, the mounted media icon, eg, USB disk, are not appearing
> on desktop. why?
Looks like you are using KDE.

> and how to restore it? as, with mounted icon, it is
> intuitive to see if a usb is mounted.
In order to see the plugged in device under KDE, you need to use 'new
device notifier' plasmoid.

Thanks,
Anoop

> thanks
> Y
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
>

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: gimp 2.6 for F8?

2008-10-10 Thread Tim
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 00:16 -0400, oleksandr korneta wrote:
> but smart has the advantage which I like. In case you have a 
> local *.rpm with unsatisfied dependencies on your system, installing 
> this rpm through "smart install" will make smart pull all of those
> from the repositories on the fly (provided they are available there),
> instead of spitting the angry error messages into STDOUT like "rpm
> -ivh" does. 

I'll point out that yum can do that, too.  

e.g. "yum localinstall httpd" would install that local file, and
should pull in any dependencies, automatically.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -r
2.6.26.5-45.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: mounted media icon on desktop, missed, F9

2008-10-10 Thread Tim
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 10:12 +1100, lux wrote:
> After moved to F9, the mounted media icon, eg, USB disk, are not
> appearing on desktop. why?

They are here...  Tell the list whether you're using Gnome, KDE, or
something else.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -r
2.6.26.5-45.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: DISCOVERY Re: Why is Firefox such a beast??

2008-10-10 Thread Tim
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 15:42 +, Beartooth wrote:
> Also, dragging one file (or many, or all) from the folder on the 
> CD to one on the hard drive would copy, not move -- i.e., not remove
> from the CD -- even though the same action would move (not copy) the
> file if I did it between most hard drive folders. (The ones in the
> backgrounds tab of what "gnome-appearance-properties %F" opens, I
> believe, are an exception in that they aren't removed from the
> donating folder.)

In general, dragging between folders on the same mount point, does a
move.  But dragging across different mount points (different partitions,
different drives, etc.), does a copy.  I've had mixed results in
dragging and dropping across to something over NFS.

> I don't know exactly what the padlock means; it seems to vary. 

In general, you cannot make changes to that file, but you may be able
read it, but sometimes you have no sort of access allowed to it (in
short, "not yours").  Someone else owns it, and you don't have the
appropriate permissions to modify it.

> In particular, Fedora will usually open a pic with a padlock -- 
> at least in the sense that it will display it; but it often won't open
> some other file at all.

Look at the permissions:  rw-rwr-r--  (that's three sequences of
readable, writeable, and executable, for owner's, group's, & others').

There's also SELinux, some files aren't allowed to be read by some
processes.  But that's more the sort of thing you encounter when trying
to webserve some file that shouldn't be served.

> Nor do I have any inkling why ownership should change. If I copy 
> something -- text, pic, or executable -- successfully to the clipboard
> (I guess Gnome has a clipboard.), and then paste it into a file that I
> create, don't I own that file? 

In general, yes.  Ownership oughtn't to change, unless you take a file
off your system.  e.g. You put it onto a removable disc, then later on
that disc is mounted and owned by someone else.  Or you're logged in
twice, as different users, moving files about between them.  Or you're
doing things over a network.  With NFS, for instance, the files are
owned by a user, using the user ID, it doesn't matter what the user
names are.  If you're user 500 on one box and 502 on another, you're a
different user going by the numbers.

> Is it even possible to set permissions in such a way that a user 
> can copy a file, but not own the copy?? That sounds like some M$
> trick ...

It's doable with Samba, at least.  It can be set so that files written
to one spot are owned by some particular user, no matter how they got
there.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -r
2.6.26.5-45.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines