Re: Assignment required

2008-11-06 Thread Nicu Buculei

Rahul Jha wrote:
I'm Rahul Jha from India, and would be glad to help out in any form of 
designing assignment.


Hi,

Have a look at our open requests queue and see if you find something 
interesting to work on:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/DesignService

Or you may want to try your hand at doing Echo icons:
https://fedorahosted.org/echo-icon-theme/

--
nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com
Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/
Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org
my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro

___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: Fedora 10 countdown banner

2008-11-06 Thread Jayme Ayres
Hi Ricky

I did the translation and export all the files I am sending [1]svg, because
I do not understand to whom I send.
I hope I have done everything right it did not, report me.

http://jaymeayres.com/arquivos/f10/fedora10-cou ntdown-banner-pt-br.tar.gz
http://jaymeayres.com/arquivos/f10/fedora10-countdown-banner_pt-br.svg

Regrads

Jayme Ayres


2008/11/4 Ricky Zhou [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 On 2008-11-04 04:14:24 PM, Jayme Ayres wrote:
  What is the procedure for making the translation of the banner? I have
  translated it here but I do not know who to send.
 If you can generate the image files, then feel free to send a tarball or
 put it up somewhere.  Otherwise, if you email your translated SVG to
 list (don't forget that we'll need 1 day and n days), then somebody
 should know how to generate them.

 If anybody generates counter images, the preferred filename is:

 fedora10-countdown-banner-$n.$lang.png

 Where $n is 1, 2, ..., 21 and $lang is the two-letter language code.

 Thanks,
 Ricky

 ___
 Fedora-art-list mailing list
 Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
 http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list




-- 
Jayme Ayres
www.jaymeayres.com
www.projetofedora.org
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JaymeAyres
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: Fedora 10 countdown banner

2008-11-06 Thread Ricky Zhou
On 2008-11-06 03:18:50 PM, Jayme Ayres wrote:
 I did the translation and export all the files I am sending [1]svg, because I
 do not understand to whom I send.
 I hope I have done everything right it did not, report me.
 
 http://jaymeayres.com/arquivos/f10/fedora10-cou ntdown-banner-pt-br.tar.gz
 http://jaymeayres.com/arquivos/f10/fedora10-countdown-banner_pt-br.svg
Looks good - they should be up on the website in an hour or two.  

Thanks,
Ricky


pgpV4Dt5AE6OD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Fedora 10 preview release shines like a star

2008-11-06 Thread Rahul Sundaram

Hi,

http://arstechnica.com/journals/linux.ars/2008/11/06/fedora-10-preview-release-shines-like-a-star

I tested the preview release in VirtualBox using the GNOME Live CD 
installer. I was particularly impressed with the high quality of the new 
desktop wallpaper image, which comes from the Solar artwork theme. The 
whole user experience felt amazingly polished. Fedora 10 is really 
shaping up nicely and feels like its going to be a very strong update


Rahul

___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


María's Awesome Gimp Videos

2008-11-06 Thread Máirí­n Duffy
Hey, María shared these with us in #fedora-art today and I wanted to 
post them to the list so everyone could see:


http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=tatadbbview=videos

~m

___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: Fedora 10 countdown banner

2008-11-06 Thread DarkPark

Nicu,
Please see my answers below.


DarkPark wrote:

Hello Nicu.


Hi Stanislav,


I'm a newbie here so don't actually know to whom I should write it,
moreover should I even mention this :)


The mailing list where the message you are replying was posted to is a
good place. We work in the open. And your bug report should in the end get
to the banner's author, Paolo, who *is* subscribed to the list.

I see



I just would like to notice that the number 20 in this
fedora10-countdown-banner.svg banner isn't aligned with arriving in ...
days.


I am sorry, I can't test it for the moment in Inkscape and with
MgOpen-Modata, I am stuck with Firefox and wrong fonts, where it does look
broken, are sure you are using the right fonts?

can't be sure about the fonts
they were taken from here http://www.ellak.gr/fonts/mgopen/index.en.html so 
seems okay
I guess the cause may be in the OS Windows I have to use. Will recheck it later 
on Fedora.



There is also not enough space for coming soon text.


The problem is because in other languages this string is wider?

can't say for sure :/



Regards,
Stanislav


Paolo Leoni wrote:

With the great help of Mo, I've made another version of Fedora
countdown
banner with horizontal layout.

This is the link to the source:

http://pleoni.altervista.org/fedora10-countdown-banner.svg

Paolo, can you upload the final design (along with the source) to the
wiki? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/PromoBanners







___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: Intoduction

2008-11-06 Thread Nicu Buculei

Rahul Jha wrote:
I'm Rahul Jha from India. I do manual painting using watercolors and 
other media. I also use graphics design softwares, especially Photoshop. 


So how familiar are you with FOSS applications, like GIMP and Inkscape? 
We use those a lot as we try as much as possible to use Fedora to create 
the graphics for Fedora.



I would love to contribute in any way to the fedora art list.


I think I showed you a few ways to contribute (DesignService, Echo) in a 
previous email.



Here are some sample work. Hope you like them.


Those are awesome works, I particularly like the second one. However, 
and I am not an expert in this matter, the alterations made to the logo 
may be beyond the usage guidelines.


--
nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com
Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/
Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org
my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro

___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: caching packages on koji builder

2008-11-06 Thread Dan Horák

Mike McLean píše v St 05. 11. 2008 v 15:14 -0500:
 Mike McLean wrote:
  This behavior is controlled by kojid options. If you specify the 
  'topurl' option for kojid, then the mock configs it generates will use 
  an http:// url to point to the repo. Otherwise it will use a file:// url 
   (using the value of the 'topdir' option, which defaults to /mnt/koji).
  
  Also, the use of a file:// url doesn't have to mean nfs. You could 
  theoretically use another shared file system.
 
 So this is true, but misleading. The interaction of the topurl and 
 pkgurl options in kojid is complicated.
 
 The topurl/topdir options determine how kojid will locate the repo. 
 However, with the current code, the repodata will contain url references 
 for the component rpms. That url is determined when the repo is 
 generated. This happens during a createrepo task on a builder, and the 
 pkgurl (not topurl) option is used.
 
 So..
 - repodata location determined by topurl/topdir options
 - rpm location determined by pkgurl option on the builder that created 
 the repo.
 
 I admit, this is a bit of a mess.

And I am lost there :-)

Squid runs, url_rewriter works and I am still unable to cache the
packages. What value is placed into the mock generated yum config?


Dan


--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list


Re: caching packages on koji builder

2008-11-06 Thread Mike McLean

Dan Horák wrote:

Mike McLean píše v St 05. 11. 2008 v 15:14 -0500:

So..
- repodata location determined by topurl/topdir options
- rpm location determined by pkgurl option on the builder that created 
the repo.


I admit, this is a bit of a mess.


And I am lost there :-)

Squid runs, url_rewriter works and I am still unable to cache the
packages. What value is placed into the mock generated yum config?


Look at the repo in question, use zless to view primary.xml.gz. Search 
for 'base=' -- the value of this field is determined by the pkgurl 
setting of the builder that created the repo.


Regardless of how yum gets the repo, once it sees this in the metadata, 
it will use this base url to download the rpms. You need to make sure 
that this hits your squid server instead of the remote http server. 
There are a couple ways you might do this.


1 - change the pkgurl setting on all your builders and regenerate all 
your repos.


2 - leave pkgurl as-is, but use an iptables redirect on your builders to 
map it to the local squid proxy.


--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list


[Bug 455647] [Indic] Firefox displays garbage Indic characters on parts of some English webpages

2008-11-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455647





--- Comment #20 from Parag Nemade [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-06 02:15:41 PST 
---
Thanks Karl for your help and patch here. I see that latest nightly builds
fixed above reported problem.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts

2008-11-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356





--- Comment #20 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-06 
14:54:31 PST ---
Landed this but had to back out due to:

REFTEST TEST-PASS |
file:///builds/slave/trunk_linux-7/build/layout/reftests/bidi/bidi-003.html | 
REFTEST TEST-KNOWN-FAIL |
file:///builds/slave/trunk_linux-7/build/layout/reftests/bidi/bidi-004.html | 
REFTEST TEST-KNOWN-FAIL |
file:///builds/slave/trunk_linux-7/build/layout/reftests/bidi/bidi-004-j.html | 
REFTEST TEST-PASS |
file:///builds/slave/trunk_linux-7/build/layout/reftests/bidi/bidi-005.html | 
../../objdir/dist/bin/run-mozilla.sh: line 131:  6372 Segmentation fault 
$prog ${1+$@}
program finished with exit code 139
TinderboxPrint: reftestbr/176/0/10

Haven't yet succeeded in reproducing.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts

2008-11-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356





--- Comment #21 from Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation) [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]  2008-11-06 16:00:55 PST ---
Try it under Valgrind.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts

2008-11-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356





--- Comment #22 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-06 
16:26:46 PST ---
(In reply to comment #21)
Thanks.  Valgrind found the uninitialized variables in comment 15, but it
hasn't reported a problem with the bidi test, with debug and optimized builds.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts

2008-11-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017





--- Comment #42 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-06 
21:53:39 EDT ---
un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.7.080608.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts

2008-11-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017





--- Comment #43 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-06 
21:57:24 EDT ---
un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.7.080608.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 458169] implement downloadable font support on Linux

2008-11-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169


Bug 458169 depends on bug 449356, which changed state.

Bug 449356 Summary: Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts

2008-11-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356


Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED
   Target Milestone|mozilla1.9.1|mozilla1.9.1b2




--- Comment #24 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-06 
20:32:39 PST ---
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/d062597e5b3d
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/b39e3a7974f2

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


Re: [Fwd: Account Problem]

2008-11-06 Thread susmit shannigrahi
 Username: stefanos4555

You are registered to the system as I can see.


 So I wonder if the wrong email address can change to the correct
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 so I can proceed with my registration.


Of course yes.

1. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/login
Do Log In.
2. Go to My Account
3. You will see something like Account Details (edit)
4. Edit as required.

Thanks



-- 
Regards,
Susmit.

=
ssh
0x86DD170A
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/user:susmit
=

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Meeting Log - 2008-11-06

2008-11-06 Thread Ricky Zhou
21:02  * ValHolla walks in
21:02 -!- sonar_logger3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] has joined #fedora-meeting
21:03  dgilmore Everyone Ready ?
21:03  * ricky is half-here
21:03 -!- Sonar_Gal [EMAIL PROTECTED]/SonarGal] has joined #fedora-meeting
21:03 -!- dgilmore changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Fedora 
Infrastructure Meeting
21:04 -!- Evil_Sonar_Chick [EMAIL PROTECTED]/SonarGal] has quit Read error: 60 
(Operation timed out)
21:04  abadger1999 hey
21:05 -!- inode0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/inode0] has left #fedora-meeting []
21:05  dgilmore .tiny 
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/query?status=newstatus=assignedstatus=reopenedgroup=milestonekeywords=%7EMeetingorder=priority
21:05  zodbot dgilmore: http://tinyurl.com/2hyyz6
21:05  dgilmore lets start with tickets
21:06  dgilmore we have one .ticket 740
21:06  dgilmore .ticket 740
21:06  zodbot dgilmore: #740 (Loaning out system time to OLPC participants) - 
Fedora Infrastructure - Trac - 
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/740
21:06  dgilmore and there really is not much to say on that right now
21:06  dgilmore well really nothing more to add right now
21:06  dgilmore I have one thing i want to go over
21:07  dgilmore Ive been working on koji2
21:07  dgilmore we have a request to have koji1 and koji2 load balanced
21:07 -!- ianweller_afk is now known as ianweller
21:07  dgilmore in the mean time koji2 is up
21:07  dgilmore and the builders are using it
21:07  dgilmore I created some classes in puppet
21:08  dgilmore kojira and some cron jobs should only be run on a single box
21:09  ricky So will those be run on koji2 so that koji1 can be rebuilt i686?
21:09  * ianweller rolls in
21:09  dgilmore ricky: right now they are on koji1
21:10  dgilmore there is 2 new classes kojipassivehub and kojiactivehub
21:10  dgilmore so its a matter of adjusting nodes to move where it gets run
21:10  dgilmore koji1 has 8gb ram and koji2 has 2gb
21:11  dgilmore I think ill swap everything to koji1  and increate the ram on 
koji2 to 4gb
21:11  dgilmore i need to check we have enough for it
21:11  dgilmore ricky: but ill switch them to koji2 before rebuilding koji1
21:11  G_work anything interesting?
21:12  ricky Ah, OK
21:12  G_work oh wait, it's just starting?
21:12 -!- cyberpear_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] has joined #fedora-meeting
21:13  dgilmore I need to add koiji2 to nagiso also
21:13  abadger1999 yep
21:13  dgilmore but right now koji2 is up and running and serving the builders
21:14  dgilmore ill update the buildsys sop with info on changing the classes 
in puppet
21:14  G_work dgilmore: poke me in an hour and I'll sort out monitoring
21:14  dgilmore if anyone can think of a way to automate the cronjobs and 
kojira running  moving to different hosts im all ears
21:15  dgilmore i guess its concievable that we could have 3 or 4 hubs/ web 
frontends
21:15  dgilmore and they just need to run on one
21:16  dgilmore so open floor?
21:16  ValHolla dgilmore: are they in active passive mode or are they load 
balanced *am confused*  if they are in active/passive mode, have the 
cron/scripts check for node being active and exit gracefully if it is the 
passive one
21:16 -!- dgilmore changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Fedora 
Infrastructure Meeting - Open Floor
21:17  dgilmore ValHolla: they are load balanced
21:17  dgilmore not active passive
21:17  ValHolla bummer  ;)
21:18  dgilmore anyone have anything they want to talk about?
21:18 -!- sonar_logger2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] has quit Connection timed out
21:18  dgilmore price of tea in China?
21:19  G_work dgilmore: not really
21:19  dgilmore alrighty then
21:19  G_work except I'm now in Australia  working for Red Hat
21:19  dgilmore ill wrap up in 30
21:19  abadger1999 G_work: Congratulations!
21:19  dgilmore G_work: :)
21:19  dgilmore abadger1999: he is in my old home town
21:19  G_work abadger1999: :)
21:19  abadger1999 Cool
21:20  ricky Congrats again
21:20  dgilmore 20
21:20  G_work abadger1999: I'm actually on internal VPN because I left my USB 
stick behind
21:20  dgilmore 10
21:20 -!- rdieter is now known as rdieter_away
21:20  dgilmore ---Meeting ENd---


pgpXtRgdgD9nV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Freeze reminder

2008-11-06 Thread Gregory Hosler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Mike McGrath wrote:
 Just a reminder the final full freeze starts on November 11th.  That
 means we've got a week to get any changes we want in and ready.

I thought that we're already frozen ?
(aside from critical/stopper fixes which are filed as per

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ReleaseEngineering/FinalFreezePolicy

yes?


   -Mike
 
 ___
 Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
 Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


- --
+-+

Please also check the log file at /dev/null for additional information.
(from /var/log/Xorg.setup.log)

| Greg Hosler   [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
+-+
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkkTqXQACgkQ404fl/0CV/Q4pACdGDDCwpFFpx2zCiTIaCx1IixL
OXQAoK49mpmHs+0cPDR78vs9xLdtO+eE
=FzFU
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Freeze reminder

2008-11-06 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
Gregory Hosler wrote:
 Mike McGrath wrote:
 Just a reminder the final full freeze starts on November 11th.  That
 means we've got a week to get any changes we want in and ready.
 
 I thought that we're already frozen ?
 (aside from critical/stopper fixes which are filed as per
 
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ReleaseEngineering/FinalFreezePolicy
 
 yes?
 
Different freeze.  Mike's talking about the Infrastructure freeze.  (We
don't make changes to infrastructure near to release time so that we
don't destabilize building and delivering packages right around release.)

-Toshio



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Freeze reminder

2008-11-06 Thread Anand Capur
 Mike McGrath wrote:

   Just a reminder the final full freeze starts on November 11th.  That
   means we've got a week to get any changes we want in and ready.
 
  I thought that we're already frozen ?
  (aside from critical/stopper fixes which are filed as per
 I think that freeze is for packages - Mike was referring to the
 infrastructure freeze (changes to our systems).

 Thanks,
 Ricky

Yep, as per the link Mike posted (
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ReleaseEngineering/FinalFreezePolicy), it
says no new builds are allowed for packages already in the Fedora
collection which is a package freeze :D
-Anand
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Freeze reminder

2008-11-06 Thread Gregory Hosler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
 Gregory Hosler wrote:
 Mike McGrath wrote:
 Just a reminder the final full freeze starts on November 11th.  That
 means we've got a week to get any changes we want in and ready.
 I thought that we're already frozen ?
 (aside from critical/stopper fixes which are filed as per

 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ReleaseEngineering/FinalFreezePolicy

 yes?

 Different freeze.  Mike's talking about the Infrastructure freeze.  (We
 don't make changes to infrastructure near to release time so that we
 don't destabilize building and delivering packages right around release.)

So, can packages (already in F10) be updated ?

I tried to do a make build in my package devel branch last night, and I got
the following error message:

koji: error: Destination tag dist-f10 is locked


I took this to mean that packages cannot be updated until after the release ?

- -Greg

 -Toshio
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
 Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


- --
+-+

Please also check the log file at /dev/null for additional information.
(from /var/log/Xorg.setup.log)

| Greg Hosler   [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
+-+
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkkTtPkACgkQ404fl/0CV/R33wCgh7Ru/yKzOGgJDUkcjMUeJD34
fisAoOGLeSiUWP7VBvZmXpLZmp+1zwAA
=t+8J
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Freeze reminder

2008-11-06 Thread Gregory Hosler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Anand Capur wrote:
 Mike McGrath wrote:
 
 Just a reminder the final full freeze starts on November 11th.  That
 means we've got a week to get any changes we want in and ready.
 I thought that we're already frozen ?
 (aside from critical/stopper fixes which are filed as per
 I think that freeze is for packages - Mike was referring to the
 infrastructure freeze (changes to our systems).

 Thanks,
 Ricky
 
 Yep, as per the link Mike posted (
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ReleaseEngineering/FinalFreezePolicy), it
 says no new builds are allowed for packages already in the Fedora
 collection which is a package freeze :D

ah. ok. now I understand.

Thank you, all, for the clarification. (and sorry for the confusion).

Might I know, please, how do we prepare a 0 day update ? (an update that is
ready on the day of the release, but not part of the release).

Thank you, and all the best,

- -Greg

 -Anand
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
 Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


- --
+-+

Please also check the log file at /dev/null for additional information.
(from /var/log/Xorg.setup.log)

| Greg Hosler   [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
+-+
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkkTtY4ACgkQ404fl/0CV/Qw4ACeNKRha2qHRE9Mo02IdekGUOlR
KBgAn3n0k5DH80e/1NZHAbm2OQB9RXLO
=HAZF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: ** PROBLEM alert - cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com/Puppet is CRITICAL **

2008-11-06 Thread Jon Stanley
I silenced this in nagios, it's expected as part of the mass
branching.  Actually I silenced all services on cvs1.  I'll re-enable
when the branching is complete.

On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Nagios Monitoring User
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 * Nagios  *

 Notification Type: PROBLEM

 Service: Puppet
 Host: cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com
 Address: cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com
 State: CRITICAL

 Date/Time: Fri Nov 7 03:25:45 UTC 2008

 Additional Info:

 PROCS CRITICAL: 0 processes with args /usr/bin/ruby /usr/sbin/puppetd, UID = 
 0 (root)




-- 
Jon Stanley
Fedora Bug Wrangler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Freeze reminder

2008-11-06 Thread Jesse Keating
On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 11:24 +0800, Gregory Hosler wrote:
 I tried to do a make build in my package devel branch last night, and I 
 got
 the following error message:
 
 koji: error: Destination tag dist-f10 is locked
 
 
 I took this to mean that packages cannot be updated until after the release ?

Do a cvs up -d from your module/ directory so that it updates your
common/ folder.  It'll set up your build target correctly.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Freeze reminder

2008-11-06 Thread Gregory Hosler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Jesse Keating wrote:
 On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 11:24 +0800, Gregory Hosler wrote:
 I tried to do a make build in my package devel branch last night, and I 
 got
 the following error message:

 koji: error: Destination tag dist-f10 is locked


 I took this to mean that packages cannot be updated until after the release ?
 
 Do a cvs up -d from your module/ directory so that it updates your
 common/ folder.  It'll set up your build target correctly.
 

ah ha.

Will building in the newly created F-10 directory become a 0 day update ?

Thank you, and all the best,

- -Greg

 
 
 
 ___
 Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
 Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


- --
+-+

Please also check the log file at /dev/null for additional information.
(from /var/log/Xorg.setup.log)

| Greg Hosler   [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
+-+
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkkTvdkACgkQ404fl/0CV/Ro2gCgsSy7I/MIHieUYhUedKIyLiJt
2iYAoM8LI5Dijh87AHak0ataUp61tDOh
=tPNm
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Freeze reminder

2008-11-06 Thread Jesse Keating
On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 12:02 +0800, Gregory Hosler wrote:
 Will building in the newly created F-10 directory become a 0 day
 update ?

If you use bodhi and request it as an update, yes.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


kdesvn-1.2.1 on F9 and Quanta

2008-11-06 Thread Anthony Messina
After upgrading to kdesvn-1.2.1 on F9, I noticed that the libkdesvnpart.la 
file is not part of the upgraded package, rendering the Quanta/kdesvn 
integration useless.

As this is a feature that I use frequently, is there a configuration change I 
need to make or another perhaps compatibility package I need to use to 
allow F9's Quanta to continue to use the kde svn features?

Thanks for the input.  -Anthony
-- 
Anthony -  http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery
8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

OPENVPN /IPTABLES help

2008-11-06 Thread woodson2
Hello, I have openvpn up and running successfully on FC9. I'm using routing 
mode with the following configuration

My internal LAN range 10.10.10.0/24
My Openvpn client range 10.8.0.0/24

I can connect and ping the openvpn server from the openvpn client but can't 
talk to the other machines on the internal LAN subnet. However, the machines on 
the internal LAN subnet can ping the openvpn clients. I have entered the 
following in iptables.
iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING -s 10.10.10.0/24 -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE
iptables -I INPUT -i tun+ -j ACCEPT
iptables -I INPUT -i tap+ -j ACCEPT
iptables -I FORWARD -i tap+ -j ACCEPT
iptables -I FORWARD -i tun+ -j ACCEPT
iptables -I INPUT -i eth0 -j ACCEPT
iptables -I FORWARD -i eth0 -j ACCEPT
I have also added a route on my d-link router that routes any traffic destined 
to 10.8.0.0/24 back to the OPENVPN server(10.10.10.xxx). This all works as it 
should when the firewall is disabled so apparently I'm missing some rule in 
iptables...Any help would be greatly appreciated..thanks..


-- 
This is an email sent via The Fedora Community Portal https://fcp.surfsite.org
https://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=301697topic_id=63522forum=10#forumpost301697
If you think, this is spam, please report this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and/or 
blame [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Weird colour problem with Real Video and Skype - RESOLVED

2008-11-06 Thread Mike Cloaked



Mike Cloaked wrote:
 
 
 However the Skype colour problem remains - 
 the camera is a Phillips SPC900NC and uses the in kernel pwc driver
 I don't know if that is relevant - 
 In the case of Skype there are no obvious controls to change anything
 concerning video from the UI although there are files in ~/.Skype and
 maybe 
 adding some mysterious ingredient to one or other file could fix it?
 
 I use the same camera on a Dell 5150 with onboard graphics and there
 is no problem with colour - so it is clearly only on the Dell 530S 
 with the nvidia graphics where I have the problem.
 
 I can't bugzilla this as Skype is not a Fedora supported application.
 It is possible that the Skype forums may yield a solution but there 
 is much more chance that a Fedora expert who is familiar with video
 and Skype may be monitoring this site.
 
 

After recent updates including updates during the Livna to rpmfusion
transition I have now tried both Skype and Real and they work perfectly.  So
I don't know what was fixed but it it working well now
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Weird-colour-problem-with-Real-Video-and-Skype-tp20058486p20357204.html
Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: A New fedora user question

2008-11-06 Thread Tim
Tim:
 How did you install them to get more than one?  I've not struck that
 problem.  I installed the Flash player using the Adobe RPM, and update
 it with yum update, along with everything else.


Richard England:
 That's a question I wish I knew the answer to.  I've suspected that it 
 may have been drug along during and update but I'm certain.  To the best 
 of my recollection, however, I simply installed two versions from Adobe. 
 I have also wondered if they changed to install location but I've spent 
 no time investigating.

Was your system a fresh install, or did you update one version of Fedora
to the next over the top?  Mine was a fresh install.  Over-the-top
installs sometimes make a mess of things.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -r
2.6.26.6-79.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Yum Woes with Python

2008-11-06 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 16:22:48 -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote:

 On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Seann Clark
  Wed Nov 05-18:08:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:nombrandue rpm -V python |grep logging
 
 
 Now I'm really confused.
 
 the logging module that comes with python is there.
 
 In python do:
 import logging.config
 
 get a backtrace?

Also interesting because of more details:

  python -v -c 'import logging.config'  output.txt

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: libssl.so.6 required by git

2008-11-06 Thread Luciano Rocha
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 10:40:25PM +1100, Sashan Govender wrote:
 Why are my dependecies broken?
 
 I upgraded Fed 8 to Fed 9 yesterday and have noticed this:
 
 git: error while loading shared libraries: libssl.so.6: cannot open
 shared object file: No such file or directory
 
 This is just one of a number of failed dependecies. I´ve tried
 reinstalling openssl and git but it doesn´t change things.  I do have

Do a make clean and then make install, so that the new library is used.

-- 
lfr
0/0


pgpEQGEqZ4Eiy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: libssl.so.6 required by git

2008-11-06 Thread Bryn M. Reeves

Sashan Govender wrote:

Why are my dependecies broken?

I upgraded Fed 8 to Fed 9 yesterday and have noticed this:

git: error while loading shared libraries: libssl.so.6: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory


Where did the git package come from? Can you post the output of rpm -qi 
git?


The git I have installed (f9, clean install, 64-bit) is:

git-1.5.6.5-1.fc9.x86_64

It depends on libssl.so.7 and libssl3.so:

$ ldd `which git` | grep ssl
libssl3.so = /lib64/libssl3.so (0x0033eb60)
libssl.so.7 = /lib64/libssl.so.7 (0x0033e4e0)

These are provided by openssl-0.9.8g-9.fc9.

Regards,
Bryn.

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


help: df slow

2008-11-06 Thread adrian kok
Hi 

I have more than 10 nfs mount folder in the machine

When I type df. it sometimes is slow and sometimes is
fine

Can I know what is the problem?

Thank you

Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com 

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: A New fedora user question

2008-11-06 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 23:28 -0800, Richard England wrote:
 Tim wrote:
  On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 11:21 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  I ran into a situation with Firefox where I had an older version of
  the Adobe flash plugin loaded and loaded a newer one thinking it would
  over-write the old one.  It loaded in a new location and I ended up 
  having two of them installed
  
 
  How did you install them to get more than one?  I've not struck that
  problem.  I installed the Flash player using the Adobe RPM, and update
  it with yum update, along with everything else.
 

 That's a question I wish I knew the answer to.  I've suspected that it 
 may have been drug along during and update but I'm certain.  To the best 
 of my recollection, however, I simply installed two versions from Adobe. 
 I have also wondered if they changed to install location but I've spent 
 no time investigating.
 
 I should really keep better logs on that machine.

Adobe has a yum repo which works with Fedora. It's better to use this
than downloading and installing the RPMs by hand.

poc

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: help: df slow

2008-11-06 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 20:48 +0800, adrian kok wrote:
 Hi 
 
 I have more than 10 nfs mount folder in the machine
 
 When I type df. it sometimes is slow and sometimes is
 fine
 
 Can I know what is the problem?

I think you answered your own question: it's slow because you have 10
NFS mounts, thus 10 interactions with network-connected servers when you
do a df.

poc

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: libssl.so.6 required by git

2008-11-06 Thread Sashan Govender
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:49 PM, Bryn M. Reeves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Sashan Govender wrote:

 Why are my dependecies broken?

 I upgraded Fed 8 to Fed 9 yesterday and have noticed this:

 git: error while loading shared libraries: libssl.so.6: cannot open
 shared object file: No such file or directory

 Where did the git package come from? Can you post the output of rpm -qi
 git?

 The git I have installed (f9, clean install, 64-bit) is:

 git-1.5.6.5-1.fc9.x86_64

 It depends on libssl.so.7 and libssl3.so:

 $ ldd `which git` | grep ssl
libssl3.so = /lib64/libssl3.so (0x0033eb60)
libssl.so.7 = /lib64/libssl.so.7 (0x0033e4e0)

 These are provided by openssl-0.9.8g-9.fc9.


[EMAIL PROTECTED] downloads]# rpm -qi git
Name: git  Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 1.5.6.5   Vendor: Fedora Project
Release : 1.fc9 Build Date: Wed 22 Oct
2008 11:42:24 PM EST
Install Date: Fri 07 Nov 2008 12:10:50 AM EST  Build Host:
x86-3.fedora.phx.redhat.com
Group   : Development/Tools Source RPM:
git-1.5.6.5-1.fc9.src.rpm
Size: 9568901  License: GPLv2
Signature   : DSA/SHA1, Thu 23 Oct 2008 11:42:36 AM EST, Key ID 62aec3dc6df2196f
Packager: Fedora Project
URL : http://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/
Summary : Core git tools
Description :
Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an
unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations
and full access to internals.

The git rpm installs the core tools with minimal dependencies.  To
install all git packages, including tools for integrating with other
SCMs, install the git-all meta-package.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] downloads]#


[EMAIL PROTECTED] downloads]# ldd `which git` | grep ssl
libssl3.so = /lib/libssl3.so (0x049b6000)
libssl.so.7 = /lib/libssl.so.7 (0x03c15000)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] downloads]#

[EMAIL PROTECTED] downloads]# rpm -qi openssl
Name: openssl  Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 0.9.8gVendor: Fedora Project
Release : 9.fc9 Build Date: Thu 29 May
2008 04:15:22 AM EST
Install Date: Thu 06 Nov 2008 10:21:02 PM EST  Build Host:
xenbuilder1.fedora.redhat.com
Group   : System Environment/Libraries   Source RPM:
openssl-0.9.8g-9.fc9.src.rpm
Size: 3680629  License: OpenSSL
Signature   : DSA/SHA1, Fri 29 Aug 2008 08:18:11 AM EST, Key ID 62aec3dc6df2196f
Packager: Fedora Project
URL : http://www.openssl.org/
Summary : The OpenSSL toolkit
Description :
The OpenSSL toolkit provides support for secure communications between
machines. OpenSSL includes a certificate management tool and shared
libraries which provide various cryptographic algorithms and
protocols.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] downloads]#

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: libssl.so.6 required by git

2008-11-06 Thread Bryn M. Reeves

Sashan Govender wrote:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] downloads]# ldd `which git` | grep ssl
libssl3.so = /lib/libssl3.so (0x049b6000)
libssl.so.7 = /lib/libssl.so.7 (0x03c15000)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] downloads]#


Well, it sure looks like git is looking for the right SSL library. Do 
you still get the error when running git (the package looks to have been 
installed recently, but I think your clocks wrong - the -qi output says 
it was installed tomorrow :-)?


Regards,
Bryn.

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: libssl.so.6 required by git

2008-11-06 Thread Sashan Govender
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 12:24 AM, Bryn M. Reeves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Sashan Govender wrote:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] downloads]# ldd `which git` | grep ssl
libssl3.so = /lib/libssl3.so (0x049b6000)
libssl.so.7 = /lib/libssl.so.7 (0x03c15000)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] downloads]#

 Well, it sure looks like git is looking for the right SSL library. Do you
 still get the error when running git (the package looks to have been
 installed recently, but I think your clocks wrong - the -qi output says it
 was installed tomorrow :-)?


Thatś because I´m in Australia. Itś 12:27 AM 7th November now.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Intel 915GM dual screen (1280x1024 and 1024x768)

2008-11-06 Thread Valent Turkovic
Hi,
I'm running Fedora 9 and Fedora 10 Linux (prerelase) on IBM R52 laptop
with Intel 915GM video chip.

I'm now using only one monitor - external 19 Samsung, but I would
like if possible to also use laptop's screen.

Is it possible to setup dual screen with external moninitor as main
monitor with resolution of 1280x1024 and laptop's monitor as secundary
monitor (1024x768).
I have been trying this using xrandr and also with configuring
xorg.conf but with no success :(

If got the logic right I need one virtual screen with size of
2304x1024 (1280+1024). Laptop would be left to the main 19 external
monitor so I need to have main monitor use offset of 1024 pixels. Have
I made some wrong conclusions?

One thing is really puzzling me - and that is maximal virtual screen I
see from xrandr output:

Screen 0: minimum 320x200, current 1280x1024, maximum 2048x1024


So is it even possible to do dual screen with these resolutions on
Intel 915GM? Why? How?

Cheers,
Valent.

-- 
http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/
linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless
registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org.
ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: libssl.so.6 required by git

2008-11-06 Thread Sashan Govender
2008/11/7 Bryn M. Reeves [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Sashan Govender wrote:

 On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 12:24 AM, Bryn M. Reeves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Sashan Govender wrote:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] downloads]# ldd `which git` | grep ssl
   libssl3.so = /lib/libssl3.so (0x049b6000)
   libssl.so.7 = /lib/libssl.so.7 (0x03c15000)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] downloads]#

 Well, it sure looks like git is looking for the right SSL library. Do you
 still get the error when running git (the package looks to have been
 installed recently, but I think your clocks wrong - the -qi output says
 it
 was installed tomorrow :-)?

 Thatś because I´m in Australia. Itś 12:27 AM 7th November now.

 Then your timezone's wrong:

 Install Date: Fri 07 Nov 2008 12:10:50 AM EST

 Fri 07 Nov 2008 12AM **EST** is still in the future.



I think that´s just a name conflict. EST is also used here.
http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/au/est.html.
And besides everything else tells me my timezone is My timezone is set
to Melbourne, Australia. Also a diff /etc/localtime
/usr/share/zoneinfo/Australia/Melbourne shows no difference.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: libssl.so.6 required by git

2008-11-06 Thread Bryn M. Reeves

Bryn M. Reeves wrote:

$ ldd `which git` | grep ssl
libssl3.so = /lib64/libssl3.so (0x0033eb60)
libssl.so.7 = /lib64/libssl.so.7 (0x0033e4e0)

These are provided by openssl-0.9.8g-9.fc9.


Sorry - the libssl3.so library is provided by nss-3.12.1.1-1.fc9.x86_64, 
but I think your problem is with the git package you have installed.


Regards,
Bryn.

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Java plugin stopped working. [SOLVED]

2008-11-06 Thread Steve

 Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 
  Lillian Angel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
  Hi,
  
  Steve wrote:
    Deepak Bhole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 
   * Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-05 13:30]:
   
    Deepak Bhole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 
   * Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-04 10:42]:
   
   I'm using 2.22.2 of ephipany and my java plugin seems to have stopped 
   working presumably as a result of a recent update 
   (nspluginwrapper-1.1.2.2.fc9.x86_64?). 

...

  The only thing I can suggest is removing all your java-1.6.0-openjdk 
  packages, and reinstall them all. Be sure you at least have 
  java-1.6.0-openjdk, and java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin.
  
 OK I'll try that tomorrow.

I removed:
Nov 06 08:46:20 Erased: java-1.6.0-openjdk
Nov 06 08:46:22 Erased: java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin

and then re-installed:
Nov 06 08:47:47 Installed: 1:java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-0.18.b09.fc9.i386
Nov 06 08:47:47 Installed: 
1:java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1.6.0.0-0.18.b09.fc9.x86_64
Nov 06 08:50:04 Installed: 1:java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-0.18.b09.fc9.x86_64

and now iced-tea shows up in the list of browser plugins and the tests at 
http://www.javatester.org/ pass.

I did some experiments and I was able to reproduce the same problem if I only 
installed:
java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-0.18.b09.fc9.i386
java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1.6.0.0-0.18.b09.fc9.x86_64

ie don't install the x86_64 package of openjdk. If I only install the x86_64 
package and not the i386 package, the java plugin still works.

Thanks,
Steve.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: libssl.so.6 required by git

2008-11-06 Thread Sashan Govender
And this is the output from ls -l /usr/lib/libssl*:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/c/git-sunya ls -l /usr/lib/libssl*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 2008-11-06 22:25 /usr/lib/libssl3.so -
../../lib/libssl3.so*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 469806 2008-05-29 04:13 /usr/lib/libssl.a
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 26 2008-11-06 22:22 /usr/lib/libssl.so -
../../lib/libssl.so.0.9.8g*
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/c/git-sunya

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


dependency champion?

2008-11-06 Thread Henk Breimer
rpm -qi libthai
Name: libthai  Relocations: (not
Description :
LibThai is a set of Thai language support routines aimed to ease
developers' tasks to incorporate Thai language support in their
applications. It includes important Thai-specific functions e.g. word
breaking, input and output methods as well as basic character and
string supports. 

Not very important for a non-thai-speaker

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ yum remove libthai

Dependencies Resolved


 Package  Arch   Version
Repository Size

Removing: libthai  x86_64
0.1.9-4.fc9installed 397 k libthai
i386   0.1.9-4.fc9installed 396 k 
Removing for dependencies:


 AdobeReader_enu  i4
86
8.1.2_SU1-1installed 115 M GConf2-gtk
x86_64 2.22.0-1.fc9   installed  12 k
ImageMagick  x86_64 6.3.8.1-4.fc9
installed  13 M ImageMagick-perl x86_64
6.3.8.1-4.fc9  installed 667 k Miro
x86_64 1.2.7-1.fc9installed  22 M
NetworkManager-gnome x86_64 1:0.7.0-0.11.svn4022.4.fc9
installed 846 k PolicyKit-gnome  x86_64
0.8-4.fc9  installed 265 k PolicyKit-gnome-libs

- snip-

installed 457 k xsanex86_64
0.995-3.fc9installed 4.8 M xsane-gimp
x86_64 0.995-3.fc9installed 605 k
xulrunnerx86_64 1.9.0.2-1.fc9
installed  23 M yelp x86_64
2.22.1-5.fc9   installed 3.0 M zenity
x86_64 2.22.1-1.fc9   installed 3.0 M

Transaction Summary

Install  0 Package(s) 
Update   0 Package(s) 
Remove 266 Package(s) 

Is this ok [y/N]: 
no, of course.
Remaining question: is this the way 'requires' should be used?

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: libssl.so.6 required by git

2008-11-06 Thread Bryn M. Reeves

Sashan Govender wrote:

I think that´s just a name conflict. EST is also used here.
http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/au/est.html.
And besides everything else tells me my timezone is My timezone is set
to Melbourne, Australia. Also a diff /etc/localtime
/usr/share/zoneinfo/Australia/Melbourne shows no difference.


Ah, I beg your pardon - didn't realise .au re-used EST.

Cheers,
Bryn.

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


RPM Fusion repo?

2008-11-06 Thread Mark Haney
I've been WAY out of the loop on Fedora here recently. What's up with 
the Fusion Repo gpg key I had to import this morning?  Based on the 
'(non-free)' in the description, I'm going to assume this will be a repo 
for non-GPL (or incompatible to the GPL) licensed software?



--
Frustra laborant quotquot se calculationibus fatigant pro inventione 
quadraturae circuli


Mark Haney
Sr. Systems Administrator
ERC Broadband
(828) 350-2415

Call (866) ERC-7110 for after hours support

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: libssl.so.6 required by git

2008-11-06 Thread Bryn M. Reeves

Sashan Govender wrote:

On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 12:24 AM, Bryn M. Reeves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Sashan Govender wrote:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] downloads]# ldd `which git` | grep ssl
   libssl3.so = /lib/libssl3.so (0x049b6000)
   libssl.so.7 = /lib/libssl.so.7 (0x03c15000)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] downloads]#

Well, it sure looks like git is looking for the right SSL library. Do you
still get the error when running git (the package looks to have been
installed recently, but I think your clocks wrong - the -qi output says it
was installed tomorrow :-)?



What the hell, git works now. I have no idea what changed. It´s not
looking for libssl.so.6 anymore.


I suspect when you re-installed it you replaced some stale version that 
was linked against libssl.so.6 with the current f9 package that 
correctly links against libssl.so.7.


Regards,
Bryn.

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Remote buffer overflow bug in kernel

2008-11-06 Thread Bryn M. Reeves

Antonio Olivares wrote:

Only users which run ndiswrapper on Fedora systems sould be concerned.


They should be concerned anyway. The ndiswrapper code does not play 
nicely with 4k kernel mode stacks which have been the standard on Fedora 
kernels for years now.


Windows NDIS drivers expect to have up to 12k of stack available to them 
and anyone who crowbars ndiswrapper into a standard Fedora kernel is 
asking for it to randomly blow up in their face.


Regards,
Bryn.

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


libssl.so.6 required by git

2008-11-06 Thread Sashan Govender
Why are my dependecies broken?

I upgraded Fed 8 to Fed 9 yesterday and have noticed this:

git: error while loading shared libraries: libssl.so.6: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory

This is just one of a number of failed dependecies. I´ve tried
reinstalling openssl and git but it doesn´t change things.  I do have
about 400 updates pending according to the update manager. That´s
because I can´t be bothered downloading all the updates yet.

This is a list of my repositories.
repo id  repo namestatus
adobe-linux-i386 Adobe Systems Incorporated   enabled :  17
fedora   Fedora 9 - i386  enabled :   9,897
livnaLivna for Fedora Core 9 - i386 - Baseenabled : 967
updates  Fedora 9 - i386 - Updatesenabled :  10
updates-newkey   Fedora 9 - i386 - Updates Newkey enabled :   4,612
repolist: 15,503


This is the version of openssl installed:

Package openssl-0.9.8g-9.fc9.i686 already installed and latest version

Thanks

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Java plugin stopped working. [SOLVED]

2008-11-06 Thread Andrew Overholt
* Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-06 09:03]:
 I did some experiments and I was able to reproduce the same problem if
 I only installed:
 java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-0.18.b09.fc9.i386
 java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1.6.0.0-0.18.b09.fc9.x86_64
 
 ie don't install the x86_64 package of openjdk. If I only install the
 x86_64 package and not the i386 package, the java plugin still works.

The OpenJDK packages aren't multi-lib compatible.

Andrew

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Document Scanners that work with F9

2008-11-06 Thread Todd Denniston

Sam Varshavchik wrote, On 11/05/2008 06:35 PM:
I, personally, use the Cannon MF-4270. I had to hack some bugs out of 
sane's pixma driver, but once I did that, it worked fine. The fixes went 
upstream, they should be in the next version of sane, so until then 
you'll have to pull them out of CVS and temporarily build your own driver.


The MF-4270 is really a multifunction scanner/copier/printer/fax 
machine. AFAIK, there is no support for the printer part of it, in CUPS, 
but I don't need the printer+fax functionality. It works fine for me as 
a scanner+copier. Supports both the flatbed and the document feeder, for 
scanning.




The actual printer _device_ driver for CUPS is often gutenprint[1].
I have seen a far amount of traffic on the gutenprint list[2] where some folks 
are trying to support some of the cannon equipment.  And as you don't seem to 
be adverse to working out of a dev repository, perhaps you might want to take 
a look and see if your multifunction device is already supported or if you 
could give them the few needed pointers to get it supported.



[1] http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/

[2] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gimp-print-devel

--
Todd Denniston
Crane Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC Crane)
Harnessing the Power of Technology for the Warfighter

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Intel 915GM dual screen (1280x1024 and 1024x768)

2008-11-06 Thread Valent Turkovic
$ xrandr --output VGA --auto --right-of LVDS
xrandr: screen cannot be larger than 2048x1024 (desired size 2304x1024)

-- 
http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/
linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless
registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org.
ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: libssl.so.6 required by git

2008-11-06 Thread Bryn M. Reeves

Sashan Govender wrote:

On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 12:24 AM, Bryn M. Reeves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Sashan Govender wrote:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] downloads]# ldd `which git` | grep ssl
   libssl3.so = /lib/libssl3.so (0x049b6000)
   libssl.so.7 = /lib/libssl.so.7 (0x03c15000)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] downloads]#

Well, it sure looks like git is looking for the right SSL library. Do you
still get the error when running git (the package looks to have been
installed recently, but I think your clocks wrong - the -qi output says it
was installed tomorrow :-)?


Thatś because I´m in Australia. Itś 12:27 AM 7th November now.


Then your timezone's wrong:

Install Date: Fri 07 Nov 2008 12:10:50 AM EST

Fri 07 Nov 2008 12AM **EST** is still in the future.

But anyway, that's not the cause of your problem - does git actually 
work now?


Regards,
Bryn.

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: RPM Fusion repo?

2008-11-06 Thread Christopher A. Williams
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 09:06 -0500, Mark Haney wrote:
 I've been WAY out of the loop on Fedora here recently. What's up with 
 the Fusion Repo gpg key I had to import this morning?  Based on the 
 '(non-free)' in the description, I'm going to assume this will be a repo 
 for non-GPL (or incompatible to the GPL) licensed software?

In short: Livna, FreshRPMs, and Dribble started their RPMFusion
cut-over. The rest of your assumptions are essentially correct.

Cheers,

Chris

--
==
By all means marry;
If you get a good wife, you'll be happy.
If you get a bad one, you'll become a philosopher.

--Socrates

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Yum Woes with Python

2008-11-06 Thread Seann Clark

Michael Schwendt wrote:

On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 16:22:48 -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote:

  

On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Seann Clark


Wed Nov 05-18:08:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:nombrandue rpm -V python |grep logging
  

Now I'm really confused.

the logging module that comes with python is there.

In python do:
import logging.config

get a backtrace?



Also interesting because of more details:

  python -v -c 'import logging.config'  output.txt

  

Here is the output of the command :
# installing zipimport hook
import zipimport # builtin
# installed zipimport hook
# /usr/lib64/python2.5/site.pyc matches /usr/lib64/python2.5/site.py
import site # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/site.pyc
# /usr/lib64/python2.5/os.pyc matches /usr/lib64/python2.5/os.py
import os # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/os.pyc
import posix # builtin
# /usr/lib64/python2.5/posixpath.pyc matches 
/usr/lib64/python2.5/posixpath.py

import posixpath # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/posixpath.pyc
# /usr/lib64/python2.5/stat.pyc matches /usr/lib64/python2.5/stat.py
import stat # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/stat.pyc
# /usr/lib64/python2.5/UserDict.pyc matches /usr/lib64/python2.5/UserDict.py
import UserDict # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/UserDict.pyc
# /usr/lib64/python2.5/copy_reg.pyc matches /usr/lib64/python2.5/copy_reg.py
import copy_reg # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/copy_reg.pyc
# /usr/lib64/python2.5/types.pyc matches /usr/lib64/python2.5/types.py
import types # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/types.pyc
import _types # builtin
# /usr/lib64/python2.5/new.pyc matches /usr/lib64/python2.5/new.py
import new # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/new.pyc
# /usr/lib64/python2.5/warnings.pyc matches /usr/lib64/python2.5/warnings.py
import warnings # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/warnings.pyc
# /usr/lib64/python2.5/linecache.pyc matches 
/usr/lib64/python2.5/linecache.py

import linecache # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/linecache.pyc
import encodings # directory /usr/lib64/python2.5/encodings
# /usr/lib64/python2.5/encodings/__init__.pyc matches 
/usr/lib64/python2.5/encodings/__init__.py
import encodings # precompiled from 
/usr/lib64/python2.5/encodings/__init__.pyc

# /usr/lib64/python2.5/codecs.pyc matches /usr/lib64/python2.5/codecs.py
import codecs # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/codecs.pyc
import _codecs # builtin
# /usr/lib64/python2.5/encodings/aliases.pyc matches 
/usr/lib64/python2.5/encodings/aliases.py
import encodings.aliases # precompiled from 
/usr/lib64/python2.5/encodings/aliases.pyc
# /usr/lib64/python2.5/encodings/utf_8.pyc matches 
/usr/lib64/python2.5/encodings/utf_8.py
import encodings.utf_8 # precompiled from 
/usr/lib64/python2.5/encodings/utf_8.pyc

Python 2.5.1 (r251:54863, Jun 15 2008, 18:24:56)
[GCC 4.3.0 20080428 (Red Hat 4.3.0-8)] on linux2
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
# 
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/TracWebAdmin-0.1.2dev-py2.5.egg/logging.pyc 
matches 
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/TracWebAdmin-0.1.2dev-py2.5.egg/logging.py
import logging # precompiled from 
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/TracWebAdmin-0.1.2dev-py2.5.egg/logging.pyc

import trac # directory /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trac
# /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trac/__init__.pyc matches 
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trac/__init__.py
import trac # precompiled from 
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trac/__init__.pyc
# /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trac/core.pyc matches 
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trac/core.py
import trac.core # precompiled from 
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trac/core.pyc

import webadmin # directory /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/webadmin
# /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/webadmin/__init__.pyc matches 
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/webadmin/__init__.py
import webadmin # precompiled from 
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/webadmin/__init__.pyc
# /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/webadmin/web_ui.pyc matches 
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/webadmin/web_ui.py
import webadmin.web_ui # precompiled from 
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/webadmin/web_ui.pyc

# /usr/lib64/python2.5/re.pyc matches /usr/lib64/python2.5/re.py
import re # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/re.pyc
# /usr/lib64/python2.5/sre_compile.pyc matches 
/usr/lib64/python2.5/sre_compile.py

import sre_compile # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/sre_compile.pyc
import _sre # builtin
# /usr/lib64/python2.5/sre_constants.pyc matches 
/usr/lib64/python2.5/sre_constants.py
import sre_constants # precompiled from 
/usr/lib64/python2.5/sre_constants.pyc
# /usr/lib64/python2.5/sre_parse.pyc matches 
/usr/lib64/python2.5/sre_parse.py

import sre_parse # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/sre_parse.pyc
# /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trac/perm.pyc matches 
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trac/perm.py
import trac.perm # precompiled from 
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trac/perm.pyc
# 

Re: RPM Fusion repo?

2008-11-06 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 07:16 -0700, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
 On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 09:06 -0500, Mark Haney wrote:
  I've been WAY out of the loop on Fedora here recently. What's up with 
  the Fusion Repo gpg key I had to import this morning?  Based on the 
  '(non-free)' in the description, I'm going to assume this will be a repo 
  for non-GPL (or incompatible to the GPL) licensed software?
 
 In short: Livna, FreshRPMs, and Dribble started their RPMFusion
 cut-over. The rest of your assumptions are essentially correct.

Except that they won't support DMCA-infringing software, e.g.
libdvdcss, which Livna for example currently does. i.e. don't delete
your Livna repo.

poc

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: RPM Fusion repo?

2008-11-06 Thread Mark Haney

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 07:16 -0700, Christopher A. Williams wrote:

On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 09:06 -0500, Mark Haney wrote:
I've been WAY out of the loop on Fedora here recently. What's up with 
the Fusion Repo gpg key I had to import this morning?  Based on the 
'(non-free)' in the description, I'm going to assume this will be a repo 
for non-GPL (or incompatible to the GPL) licensed software?

In short: Livna, FreshRPMs, and Dribble started their RPMFusion
cut-over. The rest of your assumptions are essentially correct.


Except that they won't support DMCA-infringing software, e.g.
libdvdcss, which Livna for example currently does. i.e. don't delete
your Livna repo.

poc



Ah.  Okay, that is all I needed, I appreciate the clarification.


--
Frustra laborant quotquot se calculationibus fatigant pro inventione 
quadraturae circuli


Mark Haney
Sr. Systems Administrator
ERC Broadband
(828) 350-2415

Call (866) ERC-7110 for after hours support

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


ASUS M3A78-EM -

2008-11-06 Thread Bob Goodwin


I see that Newegg has a sale on ASUS M3A78-EM AM2+/AM2 AMD 780G HDMI 
Micro ATX AMD Motherboard.


I had a failure in a back-up computer last month and have been looking 
for a cheap replacement board.  This board has on-board video which I 
would like to use.  I have not been able to determine if it has 
dedicated video memory or if it shares the main memory somehow and if 
that will cause problems?


I guess what I want to know is does anyone have experience with this 
board?  I would not install Windows, only Fedora Linux, probably F-9.


Thanks.

Bob




--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Yum Woes with Python (Michael Schwendt)

2008-11-06 Thread Nelson Chan
um.. i don't know what you are doing actually but i just make a guess.
Should the python code be   from logging import config instead of  import
logging.config ??

-- 
- Nelson Chan
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: ASUS M3A78-EM -

2008-11-06 Thread Seann Clark

Bob Goodwin wrote:


I see that Newegg has a sale on ASUS M3A78-EM AM2+/AM2 AMD 780G HDMI 
Micro ATX AMD Motherboard.


I had a failure in a back-up computer last month and have been looking 
for a cheap replacement board.  This board has on-board video which I 
would like to use.  I have not been able to determine if it has 
dedicated video memory or if it shares the main memory somehow and if 
that will cause problems?


I guess what I want to know is does anyone have experience with this 
board?  I would not install Windows, only Fedora Linux, probably F-9.


Thanks.

Bob




Just a quick thought, this board supports Crossfire, which shares memory 
and GPU between ATI cards, so it most likely has dedicated memory. 
(http://www.asus.com/products.aspx?l1=3l2=149l3=639l4=0model=2252modelmenu=1) 



Since it is onboard, and ATI, ATI usually has good support in Linux (I 
have a DFBS-D board with ATI onboard with 8 meg memory and it runs great 
on F9) and doesn't show much of a driver problem. I use my linux boxes 
as servers more than desktop/gaming because I have some rather stupid 
stuff I run on the Windows systems that I have a hard time migrating off of.



~Seann


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: will Fedora 10 have KDE 4.1.3?

2008-11-06 Thread Rex Dieter
Antonio Olivares wrote:

 Will Fedora 10 have KDE 4.1.3?

Current plan is no, it will be issued as an update shortly after F-10
release. 

-- Rex

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: kdesvn-1.2.1 on F9 and Quanta

2008-11-06 Thread Rex Dieter
Anthony Messina wrote:

 After upgrading to kdesvn-1.2.1 on F9, I noticed that the libkdesvnpart.la
 file is not part of the upgraded package, rendering the Quanta/kdesvn
 integration useless.
 
 As this is a feature that I use frequently, is there a configuration
 change I need to make or another perhaps compatibility package I need to
 use to allow F9's Quanta to continue to use the kde svn features?

File a bug please... http://bugzilla.redhat.com/

-- Rex

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Yum Woes with Python (Michael Schwendt)

2008-11-06 Thread Seann Clark

Nelson Chan wrote:
um.. i don't know what you are doing actually but i just make a guess. 

Should the python code be   from logging import config instead of 
 import logging.config ??


--
- Nelson Chan
This problem is the after effect of a package add that nicely toasted 
YUM (And cobbler, and any other Python programs using config or logging) 
and they break on the logging.config. I don't have very much of a clue 
on Python (haven't gotten around to learning it yet) so I am rather 
stumped on the problem. any time a program calls either 'import config' 
or 'import logging' the program dies saying module config not found.  
Most of the replies I have been making are results of 'try this for more 
output' requests.


Seems a wrong update has stumped a few people on the list. When I get 
the solution to this, I am adding it into my tech wiki, so I remember 
how to fix it afterwards. Sadly, though it is due to that Wiki(Trac) 
that all this started.




~Seann


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: ASUS M3A78-EM -

2008-11-06 Thread Bob Goodwin

Seann Clark wrote:

Bob Goodwin wrote:


I see that Newegg has a sale on ASUS M3A78-EM AM2+/AM2 AMD 780G HDMI 
Micro ATX AMD Motherboard.


I had a failure in a back-up computer last month and have been 
looking for a cheap replacement board.  This board has on-board video 
which I would like to use.  I have not been able to determine if it 
has dedicated video memory or if it shares the main memory somehow 
and if that will cause problems?


I guess what I want to know is does anyone have experience with this 
board?  I would not install Windows, only Fedora Linux, probably F-9.


Thanks.

Bob




Just a quick thought, this board supports Crossfire, which shares 
memory and GPU between ATI cards, so it most likely has dedicated 
memory. 
(http://www.asus.com/products.aspx?l1=3l2=149l3=639l4=0model=2252modelmenu=1) 



Since it is onboard, and ATI, ATI usually has good support in Linux (I 
have a DFBS-D board with ATI onboard with 8 meg memory and it runs 
great on F9) and doesn't show much of a driver problem. I use my linux 
boxes as servers more than desktop/gaming because I have some rather 
stupid stuff I run on the Windows systems that I have a hard time 
migrating off of.



~Seann

That's encouraging, at least there's hope it may work.

Thanks.

Bob

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: RPM Fusion repo?

2008-11-06 Thread Jeff Maxwell
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 10:04 -0500, Mark Haney wrote:
 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
  On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 07:16 -0700, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
  On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 09:06 -0500, Mark Haney wrote:
  I've been WAY out of the loop on Fedora here recently. What's up with 
  the Fusion Repo gpg key I had to import this morning?  Based on the 
  '(non-free)' in the description, I'm going to assume this will be a repo 
  for non-GPL (or incompatible to the GPL) licensed software?
  In short: Livna, FreshRPMs, and Dribble started their RPMFusion
  cut-over. The rest of your assumptions are essentially correct.
  
  Except that they won't support DMCA-infringing software, e.g.
  libdvdcss, which Livna for example currently does. i.e. don't delete
  your Livna repo.
  
  poc
  
 
 Ah.  Okay, that is all I needed, I appreciate the clarification.
 
 
 -- 

Ok, I am confused and just may be a bit slow.

I am running Fedora 9 with Gnome.  There is a graphical front end for
adding/removing software and another for updates. 

I reviewed these and did not see any indication that the fusion
repositories were added.

Is there something I am missing?  Should I be doing something to add
fusion?  

In following the various threads,  I was under the impression that
Fedora was setting this up to be seamless that the only concerned seemed
to be with the keys.

Thanks in advance for the clarification.

 Frustra laborant quotquot se calculationibus fatigant pro inventione 
 quadraturae circuli
 
 Mark Haney
 Sr. Systems Administrator
 ERC Broadband
 (828) 350-2415
 
 Call (866) ERC-7110 for after hours support
 

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Yum Woes with Python

2008-11-06 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 08:30:26 -0600, Seann Clark wrote:

python -v -c 'import logging.config'  output.txt
 

 Here is the output of the command :
 # installing zipimport hook
 import zipimport # builtin
 # installed zipimport hook
 # /usr/lib64/python2.5/site.pyc matches /usr/lib64/python2.5/site.py
 import site # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/site.pyc
 # /usr/lib64/python2.5/os.pyc matches /usr/lib64/python2.5/os.py
 import os # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/os.pyc
 import posix # builtin
 # /usr/lib64/python2.5/posixpath.pyc matches 
 /usr/lib64/python2.5/posixpath.py
 import posixpath # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/posixpath.pyc
 # /usr/lib64/python2.5/stat.pyc matches /usr/lib64/python2.5/stat.py
 import stat # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/stat.pyc
 # /usr/lib64/python2.5/UserDict.pyc matches /usr/lib64/python2.5/UserDict.py
 import UserDict # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/UserDict.pyc
 # /usr/lib64/python2.5/copy_reg.pyc matches /usr/lib64/python2.5/copy_reg.py
 import copy_reg # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/copy_reg.pyc
 # /usr/lib64/python2.5/types.pyc matches /usr/lib64/python2.5/types.py
 import types # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/types.pyc
 import _types # builtin
 # /usr/lib64/python2.5/new.pyc matches /usr/lib64/python2.5/new.py
 import new # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/new.pyc
 # /usr/lib64/python2.5/warnings.pyc matches /usr/lib64/python2.5/warnings.py
 import warnings # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/warnings.pyc
 # /usr/lib64/python2.5/linecache.pyc matches 
 /usr/lib64/python2.5/linecache.py
 import linecache # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/linecache.pyc
 import encodings # directory /usr/lib64/python2.5/encodings
 # /usr/lib64/python2.5/encodings/__init__.pyc matches 
 /usr/lib64/python2.5/encodings/__init__.py
 import encodings # precompiled from 
 /usr/lib64/python2.5/encodings/__init__.pyc
 # /usr/lib64/python2.5/codecs.pyc matches /usr/lib64/python2.5/codecs.py
 import codecs # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/codecs.pyc
 import _codecs # builtin
 # /usr/lib64/python2.5/encodings/aliases.pyc matches 
 /usr/lib64/python2.5/encodings/aliases.py
 import encodings.aliases # precompiled from 
 /usr/lib64/python2.5/encodings/aliases.pyc
 # /usr/lib64/python2.5/encodings/utf_8.pyc matches 
 /usr/lib64/python2.5/encodings/utf_8.py
 import encodings.utf_8 # precompiled from 
 /usr/lib64/python2.5/encodings/utf_8.pyc
 Python 2.5.1 (r251:54863, Jun 15 2008, 18:24:56)
 [GCC 4.3.0 20080428 (Red Hat 4.3.0-8)] on linux2
 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
 # 
 /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/TracWebAdmin-0.1.2dev-py2.5.egg/logging.pyc 
 matches 
 /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/TracWebAdmin-0.1.2dev-py2.5.egg/logging.py
 import logging # precompiled from 
 /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/TracWebAdmin-0.1.2dev-py2.5.egg/logging.pyc

B!

With the sys.path details you've given earlier in reply to Jeff,
the reason for your problem now is obvious, isn't it?

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


RE: ASUS M3A78-EM -

2008-11-06 Thread Michael . Coll-Barth
 

 From: Bob Goodwin

 I see that Newegg has a sale on ASUS M3A78-EM AM2+/AM2 AMD 780G HDMI 
 Micro ATX AMD Motherboard.

 I guess what I want to know is does anyone have experience with this 
 board?  I would not install Windows, only Fedora Linux, probably F-9.

Have you gone to their site?  I have used several of their boards over
the years and their support had been quite good.  I even got some help
with compiling the kernel to get the on-board SCSI to work.  No, I had
no real idea what I was doing, the guy just gave me really good step by
step instructions that he used but that was years ago.  













































The information contained in this message and any attachment may be
proprietary, confidential, and privileged or subject to the work
product doctrine and thus protected from disclosure.  If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or
agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error, please notify me
immediately by replying to this message and deleting it and all
copies and backups thereof.  Thank you.



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: will Fedora 10 have KDE 4.1.3?

2008-11-06 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 09:13 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
 Antonio Olivares wrote:
 
  Will Fedora 10 have KDE 4.1.3?
 
 Current plan is no, it will be issued as an update shortly after F-10
 release. 
 
 -- Rex
 

Pending free time, would it be possible to push 4.1.3
updates-testing-newkey/F9 before F10-release?
It should help clear bugs on a stable(r) platform before the update hits
F10...

- Gilboa

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Wireless, Broadcom

2008-11-06 Thread Vincent Onelli

 Message: 13
 Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 12:48:02 +0300
 From: Roman Makurin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Wireless, Broadcom
 To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using
   Fedora. fedora-list@redhat.com
 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
  
   Vincent Onelli wrote:
   1. Re: Wireless, Broadcom (Roman Makurin)

http://www.broadcom.com/support/802.11/linux_sta.php
   
Thank you so much for the link, I download the file
hybrid-portsrc-x86_32_5_10_27_6.tar.gz and the readme files, the
direction are written for people that are familiar with Linux. I got
stuck on step 5 make -C /lib/modules/2.6.xx.xx/build M='pwd' I
replaced the contents of 2.6.xx.xx with 2.6.26.6-79.fc9.i686 which
is the directory I found in my computer in the directory there is a file
build and yet the result No such file or directory I try also as root,
same problem. Any help is greatly appreciate. Vinny
   
   You need to make sure you have the kernel-devel RPM installed and it's
   easier to use
   
 make -C /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build M=`pwd`
   
   command.  Note that those tick marks are graves (backwards
   appostrophes), typically found on the key with the tilde (~).
  
  I did fallow the instructions but I could not find the file wl.ko in
  which directory should be? I also noted some error listed during the
  processing, here is all the steps that I went through and various
  messages maybe you can detect what I miss or did wrong.
  thank you.

  [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ cd hybrid_wl
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] hybrid_wl]$ make -C /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build
  M=`pwd` clean
  make: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.26.6-79.fc9.i686'
CLEAN   /home/vinnyo/hybrid_wl/.tmp_versions
  make: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.26.6-79.fc9.i686'
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] hybrid_wl]$ make -C /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build
  M=`pwd`
  make: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.26.6-79.fc9.i686'
LD  /home/vinnyo/hybrid_wl/built-in.o
CC [M]  /home/vinnyo/hybrid_wl/src/wl/sys/wl_linux.o
CC [M]  /home/vinnyo/hybrid_wl/src/wl/sys/wl_iw.o
  /home/vinnyo/hybrid_wl/src/wl/sys/wl_iw.c: In function wl_iw_get_scan:
  /home/vinnyo/hybrid_wl/src/wl/sys/wl_iw.c:934: warning: passing argument
  1 of iwe_stream_add_event from incompatible pointer type
  /home/vinnyo/hybrid_wl/src/wl/sys/wl_iw.c:934: warning: passing argument
  3 of iwe_stream_add_event from incompatible pointer type
  /home/vinnyo/hybrid_wl/src/wl/sys/wl_iw.c:934: warning: passing argument
  4 of iwe_stream_add_event makes pointer from integer without a cast
  /home/vinnyo/hybrid_wl/src/wl/sys/wl_iw.c:934: error: too few arguments
  to function iwe_stream_add_event
  /home/vinnyo/hybrid_wl/src/wl/sys/wl_iw.c:939: warning: passing argument
  1 of iwe_stream_add_point from incompatible pointer type
  /home/vinnyo/hybrid_wl/src/wl/sys/wl_iw.c:939: warning: passing argument
  3 of iwe_stream_add_point from incompatible pointer type
  /home/vinnyo/hybrid_wl/src/wl/sys/wl_iw.c:939: warning: passing argument
  4 of iwe_stream_add_point from incompatible pointer type
  /home/vinnyo/hybrid_wl/src/wl/sys/wl_iw.c:939: error: too few arguments
  to function iwe_stream_add_point
  /home/vinnyo/hybrid_wl/src/wl/sys/wl_iw.c:947: warning: passing argument
  1 of iwe_stream_add_event from incompatible pointer type
  /home/vinnyo/hybrid_wl/src/wl/sys/wl_iw.c:947: warning: passing argument
  3 of iwe_stream_add_event from incompatible pointer type
  /home/vinnyo/hybrid_wl/src/wl/sys/wl_iw.c:947: warning: passing argument
  4 of iwe_stream_add_event makes pointer from integer without a cast
  /home/vinnyo/hybrid_wl/src/wl/sys/wl_iw.c:947: error: too few arguments
  to function iwe_stream_add_event
  /home/vinnyo/hybrid_wl/src/wl/sys/wl_iw.c:955: warning: passing argument
  1 of iwe_stream_add_event from incompatible pointer type
  /home/vinnyo/hybrid_wl/src/wl/sys/wl_iw.c:955: warning: passing argument
  3 of iwe_stream_add_event from incompatible pointer type
  /home/vinnyo/hybrid_wl/src/wl/sys/wl_iw.c:955: warning: passing argument
  4 of iwe_stream_add_event makes pointer from integer without a cast
  /home/vinnyo/hybrid_wl/src/wl/sys/wl_iw.c:955: error: too few arguments
  to function iwe_stream_add_event
  /home/vinnyo/hybrid_wl/src/wl/sys/wl_iw.c:961: warning: passing argument
  1 of iwe_stream_add_event from incompatible pointer type
  /home/vinnyo/hybrid_wl/src/wl/sys/wl_iw.c:961: warning: passing argument
  3 of iwe_stream_add_event from incompatible pointer type
  /home/vinnyo/hybrid_wl/src/wl/sys/wl_iw.c:961: warning: passing argument
  4 of iwe_stream_add_event makes pointer from integer without a cast
  /home/vinnyo/hybrid_wl/src/wl/sys/wl_iw.c:961: error: too few arguments
  to function iwe_stream_add_event
  /home/vinnyo/hybrid_wl/src/wl/sys/wl_iw.c:973: warning: passing argument
  1 of iwe_stream_add_point from incompatible pointer type
  

Re: Java plugin stopped working. [SOLVED]

2008-11-06 Thread Steve

 Andrew Overholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 * Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-06 09:03]:
  I did some experiments and I was able to reproduce the same problem if
  I only installed:
  java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-0.18.b09.fc9.i386
  java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1.6.0.0-0.18.b09.fc9.x86_64
  
  ie don't install the x86_64 package of openjdk. If I only install the
  x86_64 package and not the i386 package, the java plugin still works.
 
 The OpenJDK packages aren't multi-lib compatible.

So that means that the x86_64 and i386 packages shouldn't be installed at the 
same time? ;-D

If these packages are not meant to be installed at the same time, then perhaps 
it would be a good idea to have the package dependecies set up to prevent this 
by default. Is there a situation when you would want them both installed?

Steve

 Andrew

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: CUPS, Alpine, and printserving

2008-11-06 Thread Beartooth
On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 20:20:48 +1030, Tim wrote:

 On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 22:06 +, Beartooth wrote:
[...]
  Machines #2, #3, and #4 all show my wife's printer
 downstairs, as well as another. (Machine #1 does not.) #2 and #4 have
 the other, set to default, as the real machine on #1 -- though for a
 while they kept insisting it did not exist. Machine #3 has the other
 printer shown with a URI saying file: /dev/null -- and won't let me
 remove it!
 
 You might want to tell us specifically what you did to achieve all this,
 rather than just the results.  Very little fiddling should be needed
 from a fresh start, but some amount of fiddling might be needed to undo
 a pre-mangled system.

I can't tell you, alas!,for two reasons. I would have, if I could 
remember. But I didn't keep good track; and, you might know, I did a 
whole series of things on one machine -- and then realized I had somehow 
gotten off #3 and onto #2 ...

 On a fresh system, all you should have to do is connect a printer to the
 print server computer, and let it sort itself out, or manually set that
 printer up on the server.  Or a bit of both (I renamed the automatic
 named printer settings to something less annoying).  Whichever way you
 go, once the server can print to its own printer, it's working, and
 you'd then configure the server to let the rest of the LAN make use of
 it.  That's a two-parter, allowing CUPS through the firewall (*), and
 configuring CUPS administration options related to sharing (**),

I'm thinking a fresh start is indeed indicated, yet again -- or 
at least a nearly fresh one.

Let me see if I have this straight. Having done most of the two 
footnoted parts above (maybe all -- I tried to), I *think* I can just go 
from client to client, deleting *all* printers (if all will let me; last 
time I tried that, as I said above, there was one that seemed immortal, 
afaict).

If/when I get thepresent entries deleted, they will presumably 
once again find my wife's printer downstairs. They did last time, 
doubly : once as a printer and once as a fax. Does it hurt to have that 
there? Should I re-delete it, or maybe go shut her machine down (she's 
out of town) before I start telling clients to find printers?


 * On my LAN, all the PCs are trusted explicitly, so I took the easy
 option of setting the firewall to trust eth0 as a whole, rather than
 particular ports.  There's another barrier between the LAN and the
 internet.  Firewall on each PC get in the way of print serving, and also
 some print clients.  As I recall, it got in the way of automatically
 discovering the print server on the LAN.  The print server can
 periodically announce its presence, but the firewall stopped that.

I did that, iiuc : marked both eth0 and ippp+ as trusted on all 
clients and on the server.

 ** Share out that printer to the LAN but it doesn't need sharing to the
 internet, unless you have a mixture of different isolated subnets, where
 that option will allow crossing from one subnet to another.  

I don't have such complications -- it's all on plain LAN, without 
subnets. But I don't follow how I share it only to the LAN -- unless 
that's what trusting eth0 and ippp+ do, perhaps??

 Perhaps you might want to allow remote administration of the server,and 
 allow users
 to cancel any jobs, but that's icing on the cake, it's not needed just
 to be able to print.  

OK.

 You may also want the server to include printers
 on other CUPS servers, if you had other ones on the premises.  But,
 again, that's not needed.  And can get messy if you have several servers
 publishing their own printers, plus republishing the other server's
 printers.

That's the one thought that gives me pause about my wife's 
printer. We don't normally fax things, nor receive faxes; but I can 
easily imagine it becoming convenient to be able to print to one 
another's printers, for instance if one breaks down or runs out of ink/
toner/whatever. Otoh, it sounds like a large can of worms ...
 
 On the clients, you shouldn't need to do anything.  They should
 automatically find out about all the printers available on the LAN, and
 automatically list them as printable to.  This should take a few
 moments, not ages.  All you should have to do, if you had more than one
 choice, would be to pick a default.

I haven't (yet, at least) done a thing about my wife's machine 
nor printer -- not made it either a client or a server.

 Having said that, if you're reconfiguring a system which already had
 printers configured all over the place on the clients, you'd want to
 remove all those configurations, and then let them find the servers by
 themselves, again.

Hmmm ... Does that mean I need to go reconfigure my wife's CUPS 
in any case??

-- 
Beartooth Staffwright, PhD, Neo-Redneck Linux Convert
Remember I know precious little of what I am talking about.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list

Re: Yum Woes with Python (Michael Schwendt)

2008-11-06 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 23:10:28 +0800, Nelson Chan wrote:

 um.. i don't know what you are doing actually but i just make a guess.
 Should the python code be   from logging import config instead of  import
 logging.config ??

No, the result would be different (module logging would be undefined), but
in this thread it would fail in the same way.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: RPM Fusion repo?

2008-11-06 Thread Mark Haney

Jeff Maxwell wrote:

On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 10:04 -0500, Mark Haney wrote:

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 07:16 -0700, Christopher A. Williams wrote:

On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 09:06 -0500, Mark Haney wrote:
I've been WAY out of the loop on Fedora here recently. What's up with 
the Fusion Repo gpg key I had to import this morning?  Based on the 
'(non-free)' in the description, I'm going to assume this will be a repo 
for non-GPL (or incompatible to the GPL) licensed software?

In short: Livna, FreshRPMs, and Dribble started their RPMFusion
cut-over. The rest of your assumptions are essentially correct.

Except that they won't support DMCA-infringing software, e.g.
libdvdcss, which Livna for example currently does. i.e. don't delete
your Livna repo.

poc


Ah.  Okay, that is all I needed, I appreciate the clarification.


--


Ok, I am confused and just may be a bit slow.

I am running Fedora 9 with Gnome.  There is a graphical front end for
adding/removing software and another for updates. 


I reviewed these and did not see any indication that the fusion
repositories were added.

Is there something I am missing?  Should I be doing something to add
fusion?  



I didn't do anything to add the repo to mine.  But then, I only ever do 
updates from the command line.



--
Frustra laborant quotquot se calculationibus fatigant pro inventione 
quadraturae circuli


Mark Haney
Sr. Systems Administrator
ERC Broadband
(828) 350-2415

Call (866) ERC-7110 for after hours support

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: RPM Fusion repo?

2008-11-06 Thread Marcelo Magno T. Sales
Em Qui 06 Nov 2008, Jeff Maxwell escreveu:
 On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 10:04 -0500, Mark Haney wrote:
  Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
   On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 07:16 -0700, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
   On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 09:06 -0500, Mark Haney wrote:
   I've been WAY out of the loop on Fedora here recently. What's
   up with the Fusion Repo gpg key I had to import this morning? 
   Based on the '(non-free)' in the description, I'm going to
   assume this will be a repo for non-GPL (or incompatible to the
   GPL) licensed software?
  
   In short: Livna, FreshRPMs, and Dribble started their RPMFusion
   cut-over. The rest of your assumptions are essentially correct.
  
   Except that they won't support DMCA-infringing software, e.g.
   libdvdcss, which Livna for example currently does. i.e. don't
   delete your Livna repo.
  
   poc
 
  Ah.  Okay, that is all I needed, I appreciate the clarification.
 
 
  --

 Ok, I am confused and just may be a bit slow.

 I am running Fedora 9 with Gnome.  There is a graphical front end for
 adding/removing software and another for updates.

 I reviewed these and did not see any indication that the fusion
 repositories were added.

 Is there something I am missing?  Should I be doing something to add
 fusion?

 In following the various threads,  I was under the impression that
 Fedora was setting this up to be seamless that the only concerned
 seemed to be with the keys.

 Thanks in advance for the clarification.

The Fusion repo was automatically installed only for those who had Livna 
configured. Did you? If not, you can get Livna configuration RPM here:
http://rpm.livna.org/rlowiki/

[]'s
Marcelo

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Java plugin stopped working. [SOLVED]

2008-11-06 Thread Andrew Overholt
* Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-06 10:30]:
 
  Andrew Overholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
  * Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-06 09:03]:
   I did some experiments and I was able to reproduce the same problem if
   I only installed:
   java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-0.18.b09.fc9.i386
   java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1.6.0.0-0.18.b09.fc9.x86_64
   
   ie don't install the x86_64 package of openjdk. If I only install the
   x86_64 package and not the i386 package, the java plugin still works.
  
  The OpenJDK packages aren't multi-lib compatible.
 
 So that means that the x86_64 and i386 packages shouldn't be installed
 at the same time? ;-D

Technically yes, I guess.  Tom?

 If these packages are not meant to be installed at the same time, then
 perhaps it would be a good idea to have the package dependecies set up
 to prevent this by default.

Yes.  Lillian/Deepak:  any thoughts on this?

 Is there a situation when you would want them both installed?

You *may* want both installed if you have 32-bit and 64-bit JNI code in
different apps but in general you won't need both.

Andrew

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Yum Woes with Python (Michael Schwendt)

2008-11-06 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 09:18:01 -0600, Seann Clark wrote:

 Nelson Chan wrote:
  um.. i don't know what you are doing actually but i just make a guess. 
 
  Should the python code be   from logging import config instead of 
   import logging.config ??
 
  -- 
  - Nelson Chan
 This problem is the after effect of a package add that nicely toasted 
 YUM (And cobbler, and any other Python programs using config or logging) 
 and they break on the logging.config. I don't have very much of a clue 
 on Python (haven't gotten around to learning it yet) so I am rather 
 stumped on the problem. any time a program calls either 'import config' 
 or 'import logging' the program dies saying module config not found.  
 Most of the replies I have been making are results of 'try this for more 
 output' requests.
 
 Seems a wrong update has stumped a few people on the list. When I get 
 the solution to this, I am adding it into my tech wiki, so I remember 
 how to fix it afterwards. Sadly, though it is due to that Wiki(Trac) 
 that all this started.

The solution is to not alter the Python modules search path in the way
you've demonstrated. A Python module that inserts its own search path at
the beginning of the system's list of paths ought to have very (!) good
reason to do so. If it's a Fedora package that does this, file a bug
report. It may append its own path, but inserting or prepending its
path bears a big risk... and in this case, it breaks. ;)

-- 
Michael Schwendt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fedora release 9 (Sulphur) - Linux 2.6.26.6-79.fc9.i686
loadavg: 1.35 1.17 1.19

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Wireless, Broadcom

2008-11-06 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 05:28 -0500, Vincent Onelli wrote:
  Look at https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96
 
 I could not connect to the above link a message came on give me 2
 choice
  get me out of here and add exception adding exception indicate
 high
 security risk, I decided not to go forward. any advice? thank you.  
 

It just means Firefox didn't recognize the site certificate. Which is
normal for sites that don't want to pay an exorbitant fee to Verisign or
whatever. I wouldn't worry about in this case since the RPMs are signed
anyway. I would worry if it was your bank.

poc

PS Please trim stuff before quoting. 90% of the quoted material in your
message is completely irrelevant to the question.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: dependency champion?

2008-11-06 Thread Beartooth
On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:03:20 +0100, Henk Breimer wrote:

 rpm -qi libthai
 Name: libthai  Relocations: (not Description
 :
 LibThai is a set of Thai language support routines aimed to ease
 developers' tasks to incorporate Thai language support in their
 applications. It includes important Thai-specific functions e.g. word
 breaking, input and output methods as well as basic character and string
 supports.
 
 Not very important for a non-thai-speaker
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ yum remove libthai
[]

 Install  0 Package(s)
 Update   0 Package(s)
 Remove 266 Package(s)
 
 Is this ok [y/N]:
 no, of course.
 Remaining question: is this the way 'requires' should be used?

Thank you for posting that. I've been seeing much the same thing, 
for it seems like two or three releases now; and it has always wanted to 
take not only a huge number of things, but several that are crucial to my 
use. There has to be something wrong: I always remove umpteen dozen apps 
having to do with languages I never see, and then have to leave Thai.

Can somebody at least tell us *why* this patent aberration is 
arising? 

-- 
Beartooth Staffwright, PhD, Neo-Redneck Linux Convert
Remember I know precious little of what I am talking about.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: dependency champion?

2008-11-06 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 15:03:20 +0100, Henk Breimer wrote:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ yum remove libthai

 Remove 266 Package(s) 
 
 Is this ok [y/N]: 
 no, of course.
 Remaining question: is this the way 'requires' should be used?

You show that you don't understand the reason for this. This is a shared
library that is linked with another system library: Pango. It results in
an automatic 'Requires' on the libthai library SONAME in the pango
package, since the library is required at run-time and isn't optional.

$ repoquery --whatrequires libthai.so.0
libthai-0:0.1.9-4.fc9.i386
pango-0:1.20.4-1.fc9.i386
libthai-devel-0:0.1.9-4.fc9.i386
scim-thai-0:0.1.1-2.fc9.i386
pango-0:1.20.1-1.fc9.i386

Pango in turn is required by many a dozen packages. Removing Pango creates
a long dependency chain of packages that would need to be removed, too.

In case you want to remove a system library like LibThai, you would need to
disable it in Pango -- or rewrite Pango to load the library as an optional
plugin (that's likely harder).

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Yum Woes with Python(Solved)

2008-11-06 Thread Seann Clark

Michael Schwendt wrote:

On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 08:30:26 -0600, Seann Clark wrote:

  

  python -v -c 'import logging.config'  output.txt

  
  

Here is the output of the command :
# installing zipimport hook
import zipimport # builtin
# installed zipimport hook
# /usr/lib64/python2.5/site.pyc matches /usr/lib64/python2.5/site.py
import site # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/site.pyc
# /usr/lib64/python2.5/os.pyc matches /usr/lib64/python2.5/os.py
import os # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/os.pyc
import posix # builtin
# /usr/lib64/python2.5/posixpath.pyc matches 
/usr/lib64/python2.5/posixpath.py

import posixpath # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/posixpath.pyc
# /usr/lib64/python2.5/stat.pyc matches /usr/lib64/python2.5/stat.py
import stat # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/stat.pyc
# /usr/lib64/python2.5/UserDict.pyc matches /usr/lib64/python2.5/UserDict.py
import UserDict # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/UserDict.pyc
# /usr/lib64/python2.5/copy_reg.pyc matches /usr/lib64/python2.5/copy_reg.py
import copy_reg # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/copy_reg.pyc
# /usr/lib64/python2.5/types.pyc matches /usr/lib64/python2.5/types.py
import types # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/types.pyc
import _types # builtin
# /usr/lib64/python2.5/new.pyc matches /usr/lib64/python2.5/new.py
import new # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/new.pyc
# /usr/lib64/python2.5/warnings.pyc matches /usr/lib64/python2.5/warnings.py
import warnings # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/warnings.pyc
# /usr/lib64/python2.5/linecache.pyc matches 
/usr/lib64/python2.5/linecache.py

import linecache # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/linecache.pyc
import encodings # directory /usr/lib64/python2.5/encodings
# /usr/lib64/python2.5/encodings/__init__.pyc matches 
/usr/lib64/python2.5/encodings/__init__.py
import encodings # precompiled from 
/usr/lib64/python2.5/encodings/__init__.pyc

# /usr/lib64/python2.5/codecs.pyc matches /usr/lib64/python2.5/codecs.py
import codecs # precompiled from /usr/lib64/python2.5/codecs.pyc
import _codecs # builtin
# /usr/lib64/python2.5/encodings/aliases.pyc matches 
/usr/lib64/python2.5/encodings/aliases.py
import encodings.aliases # precompiled from 
/usr/lib64/python2.5/encodings/aliases.pyc
# /usr/lib64/python2.5/encodings/utf_8.pyc matches 
/usr/lib64/python2.5/encodings/utf_8.py
import encodings.utf_8 # precompiled from 
/usr/lib64/python2.5/encodings/utf_8.pyc

Python 2.5.1 (r251:54863, Jun 15 2008, 18:24:56)
[GCC 4.3.0 20080428 (Red Hat 4.3.0-8)] on linux2
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
# 
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/TracWebAdmin-0.1.2dev-py2.5.egg/logging.pyc 
matches 
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/TracWebAdmin-0.1.2dev-py2.5.egg/logging.py
import logging # precompiled from 
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/TracWebAdmin-0.1.2dev-py2.5.egg/logging.pyc



B!

With the sys.path details you've given earlier in reply to Jeff,
the reason for your problem now is obvious, isn't it?

  
Oy, I just noticed that as well. Seems to be simple to take care of. I 
just backed up the 
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/TracWebAdmin-0.1.2dev-py2.5.egg 
directory, and then removed it. Low, and behold, Yum works and so does 
everything else. This has been a good learning step for me in what 
prolly is basic python paths.



Thanks for your help everyone!

Seann


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: RPM Fusion repo?

2008-11-06 Thread Jeff Maxwell
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 12:37 -0300, Marcelo Magno T. Sales wrote:
 Em Qui 06 Nov 2008, Jeff Maxwell escreveu:
  On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 10:04 -0500, Mark Haney wrote:
   Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 07:16 -0700, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 09:06 -0500, Mark Haney wrote:
I've been WAY out of the loop on Fedora here recently. What's
up with the Fusion Repo gpg key I had to import this morning? 
Based on the '(non-free)' in the description, I'm going to
assume this will be a repo for non-GPL (or incompatible to the
GPL) licensed software?
   
In short: Livna, FreshRPMs, and Dribble started their RPMFusion
cut-over. The rest of your assumptions are essentially correct.
   
Except that they won't support DMCA-infringing software, e.g.
libdvdcss, which Livna for example currently does. i.e. don't
delete your Livna repo.
   
poc
  
   Ah.  Okay, that is all I needed, I appreciate the clarification.
  
  
   --
 
  Ok, I am confused and just may be a bit slow.
 
  I am running Fedora 9 with Gnome.  There is a graphical front end for
  adding/removing software and another for updates.
 
  I reviewed these and did not see any indication that the fusion
  repositories were added.
 
  Is there something I am missing?  Should I be doing something to add
  fusion?
 
  In following the various threads,  I was under the impression that
  Fedora was setting this up to be seamless that the only concerned
  seemed to be with the keys.
 
  Thanks in advance for the clarification.
 
 The Fusion repo was automatically installed only for those who had Livna 
 configured. Did you? If not, you can get Livna configuration RPM here:
 http://rpm.livna.org/rlowiki/
 
Never mind.  Once I finally took the time to read through the threads
more thoroughly and checked the web sites out, the upgrade to fusion was
intuitive.

Thanks.
 []'s
 Marcelo
 

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Intel 915GM dual screen (1280x1024 and 1024x768)

2008-11-06 Thread Peter Langfelder
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 5:47 AM, Valent Turkovic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,
 I'm running Fedora 9 and Fedora 10 Linux (prerelase) on IBM R52 laptop
 with Intel 915GM video chip.

 I'm now using only one monitor - external 19 Samsung, but I would
 like if possible to also use laptop's screen.

 Is it possible to setup dual screen with external moninitor as main
 monitor with resolution of 1280x1024 and laptop's monitor as secundary
 monitor (1024x768).
 I have been trying this using xrandr and also with configuring
 xorg.conf but with no success :(

 If got the logic right I need one virtual screen with size of
 2304x1024 (1280+1024). Laptop would be left to the main 19 external
 monitor so I need to have main monitor use offset of 1024 pixels. Have
 I made some wrong conclusions?

 One thing is really puzzling me - and that is maximal virtual screen I
 see from xrandr output:

 Screen 0: minimum 320x200, current 1280x1024, maximum 2048x1024


 So is it even possible to do dual screen with these resolutions on
 Intel 915GM? Why? How?

Valent,

according to what I read, e.g., here
http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/Xorg_RandR_1.2#Notes_from_xserver-xorg-video-intel.readme,
the Intel GM cards before 965 only have 11 bit addresses for pixels
and hence can only do 2048 pixels in either direction. Intel simply
made a stupid design decision.

Peter

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: ASUS M3A78-EM -

2008-11-06 Thread Bob Goodwin

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 

  

From: Bob Goodwin



  
I see that Newegg has a sale on ASUS M3A78-EM AM2+/AM2 AMD 780G HDMI 
Micro ATX AMD Motherboard.
I guess what I want to know is does anyone have experience with this 
board?  I would not install Windows, only Fedora Linux, probably F-9.



Have you gone to their site?  I have used several of their boards over
the years and their support had been quite good.  I even got some help
with compiling the kernel to get the on-board SCSI to work.  No, I had
no real idea what I was doing, the guy just gave me really good step by
step instructions that he used but that was years ago.  


Yes, but there was no negative information there as one might expect and
nothing about video memory. 


I think I will risk it and get the board.  I would like to get that other
computer running since I usually keep two configured the same so I always
have a source of configuration information as well as one to experiment 
with ...


Thanks.

Bob


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: will Fedora 10 have KDE 4.1.3?

2008-11-06 Thread Rex Dieter
Gilboa Davara wrote:

 Pending free time, would it be possible to push 4.1.3
 updates-testing-newkey/F9 before F10-release?

It'll get pushed when ready, which may (likely) or may not be before
F-10. :)

-- Rex

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: CUPS, Alpine, and printserving

2008-11-06 Thread Tim
Beartooth:
 Let me see if I have this straight. Having done most of the two 
 footnoted parts above (maybe all -- I tried to), I *think* I can just go 
 from client to client, deleting *all* printers (if all will let me; last 
 time I tried that, as I said above, there was one that seemed immortal, 
 afaict).

If desperate, one could go into /etc/cups/ and remove the entries for
particular printers.  I'm not sure how it handles missing files, but you
could load the file and remove all the configuration data, leaving just
the two comment lines at the top of printers.conf.

   If/when I get thepresent entries deleted, they will presumably 
 once again find my wife's printer downstairs. They did last time, 
 doubly : once as a printer and once as a fax. Does it hurt to have that 
 there? Should I re-delete it, or maybe go shut her machine down (she's 
 out of town) before I start telling clients to find printers?

I can't see a problem with their being a paper printer and a fax printer
on the list, unless they're named so badly that you can't pick the right
one, but a rename would sort that out.

If that computer's not in use, you could remove it from the equation
while you set the rest up.

Tim:
 * On my LAN, all the PCs are trusted explicitly, so I took the easy
 option of setting the firewall to trust eth0 as a whole, rather than
 particular ports.

   I did that, iiuc : marked both eth0 and ippp+ as trusted on all 
 clients and on the server.

I wouldn't go marking ppp as trusted, that's the interface to the world.
That's throwing the firewall away, completely.

 ** Share out that printer to the LAN but it doesn't need sharing to the
 internet, unless you have a mixture of different isolated subnets, where
 that option will allow crossing from one subnet to another.  

   I don't have such complications -- it's all on plain LAN, without 
 subnets. But I don't follow how I share it only to the LAN -- unless 
 that's what trusting eth0 and ippp+ do, perhaps??

CUPS has two administration options in this area, share printers (to the
local network), and allow printing from the internet (share it to anyone
and everything).  The first will only allow printing within the boundary
of what's considered the local network.

Firewall configuration is a separate issue.  Allowing *connections*
between interfaces and ports, and where the allowing and disallowing
happens (with the local network, and the external network, separately).


 We don't normally fax things, nor receive faxes; but I can 
 easily imagine it becoming convenient to be able to print to one 
 another's printers, for instance if one breaks down or runs out of ink/
 toner/whatever. Otoh, it sounds like a large can of worms ...

Or, if one printer has features that the other does not (colour,
double-sided, collating, etc.), or you're going to print something
intended for the other person (it can sit in their printer out tray).
There's a plethora of reasons why you might do that.

On the other hand, if you have one printer that you want to be able to
use anywhere, and another that will only be used with the computer it
sits next to, then share out the first one, and don't share the second
one.
 
 I haven't (yet, at least) done a thing about my wife's machine 
 nor printer -- not made it either a client or a server.

So, that's still got the factory pre-configuration, so to speak?  In
that case, I'd leave it alone while you play with the rest of your
network, and you can *look* at what it does as you go along.

 Having said that, if you're reconfiguring a system which already had
 printers configured all over the place on the clients, you'd want to
 remove all those configurations, and then let them find the servers by
 themselves, again.

   Hmmm ... Does that mean I need to go reconfigure my wife's CUPS 
 in any case??

Now I'm confused.  If you hadn't done anything to it before, why would
you need to now?

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -r
2.6.26.6-79.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


rawhide install video problems

2008-11-06 Thread DJ Delorie

I have an x86_64 machine with a chaintech-built GeForce 6600 card.
Once anaconda runs, it brings up a graphics mode incorrectly, and
makes the display unusable:

  http://www.delorie.com/tmp/rawhide-g6600-screen.jpg
  http://www.delorie.com/tmp/rawhide-g6600-screen.html (if the above 
complains)

I've been having this problem since FC6 (when I got the machine), and
have had to resort to text-mode installs every time.  The Rawhide
isolinux install doesn't give me that option any more (booting off a
USB stick at least).

Can we please fix this?  I'm willing to test updated packages, since
the machine was recently removed from its previous purpose so I'm able
to use it for testing.

DJ

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Java plugin stopped working. [SOLVED]

2008-11-06 Thread Deepak Bhole
* Andrew Overholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-06 10:44]:
 * Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-06 10:30]:
  
   Andrew Overholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
   * Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-11-06 09:03]:
I did some experiments and I was able to reproduce the same problem if
I only installed:
java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-0.18.b09.fc9.i386
java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1.6.0.0-0.18.b09.fc9.x86_64

ie don't install the x86_64 package of openjdk. If I only install the
x86_64 package and not the i386 package, the java plugin still works.
   
   The OpenJDK packages aren't multi-lib compatible.
  
  So that means that the x86_64 and i386 packages shouldn't be installed
  at the same time? ;-D
 
 Technically yes, I guess.  Tom?
 
  If these packages are not meant to be installed at the same time, then
  perhaps it would be a good idea to have the package dependecies set up
  to prevent this by default.
 
 Yes.  Lillian/Deepak:  any thoughts on this?
 

Hmm, outside of removing it from yum, I am not sure if it is possible to
create an RPM conflict based on arch. We could create a dummy provides
based on arch, and have those conflict... I've never tried it though so
I am not sure how well it would work.

  Is there a situation when you would want them both installed?
 
 You *may* want both installed if you have 32-bit and 64-bit JNI code in
 different apps but in general you won't need both.
 
 Andrew

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Document Scanners that work with F9

2008-11-06 Thread Dave Feustel
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 09:13:16AM -0500, Todd Denniston wrote:
 Sam Varshavchik wrote, On 11/05/2008 06:35 PM:
 I, personally, use the Cannon MF-4270. I had to hack some bugs out of  
 sane's pixma driver, but once I did that, it worked fine. The fixes 
 went upstream, they should be in the next version of sane, so until 
 then you'll have to pull them out of CVS and temporarily build your own 
 driver.

 The MF-4270 is really a multifunction scanner/copier/printer/fax  
 machine. AFAIK, there is no support for the printer part of it, in 
 CUPS, but I don't need the printer+fax functionality. It works fine for 
 me as a scanner+copier. Supports both the flatbed and the document 
 feeder, for scanning.


 The actual printer _device_ driver for CUPS is often gutenprint[1].
 I have seen a far amount of traffic on the gutenprint list[2] where some 
 folks are trying to support some of the cannon equipment.  And as you 
 don't seem to be adverse to working out of a dev repository, perhaps you 
 might want to take a look and see if your multifunction device is already 
 supported or if you could give them the few needed pointers to get it 
 supported.


 [1] http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/

 [2] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gimp-print-devel

I am the OP for this thread. I am looking for a high resolution document
scanner only, (no printer, no copier (I have a laser printer already)
functions) with a usb or scsi interface. Years ago I had an HP C2
scanner which worked very well but it was big and slow. Plus I only had
windows drivers for it.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: libssl.so.6 required by git

2008-11-06 Thread Tim
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 14:03 +, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
 didn't realise .au re-used EST.

There are a few generically named time zones, like CST (central standard
time), etc., that are used by more than one or two countries.  Some also
get known by two names, e.g. EST or AEST, where the A prefix is meant to
mean Australia.  But it's still ripe for problems.

I remember the fun of trying to work out when to watch a space launch,
when the NASA website mentions a time, but failed to mention what
timezone.  You'd think, they of all people, would know they get
international on-lookers, and specify one, or advertise using GMT.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -r
2.6.26.6-79.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: RPM Fusion repo?

2008-11-06 Thread Tim
I got confused by the first round of updates, with audacious non-free
plugins (e.g. MP3) being updated with audacious plugins freeworld.  A
non-free thing got replaced with a free thing?

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -r
2.6.26.6-79.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Wireless, Broadcom

2008-11-06 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 05:28:09 -0500,
  Vincent Onelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I could not connect to the above link a message came on give me 2 choice
  get me out of here and add exception adding exception indicate high
 security risk, I decided not to go forward. any advice? thank you.  

You can also make the exception temporary when you get far enough along in
the process.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: RPM Fusion repo?

2008-11-06 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 03:27 +1030, Tim wrote:
 I got confused by the first round of updates, with audacious non-free
 plugins (e.g. MP3) being updated with audacious plugins freeworld.  A
 non-free thing got replaced with a free thing?

There are two repos, free and non-free. Make sure they are both enabled.

poc

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: RPM Fusion repo?

2008-11-06 Thread Tom Horsley
On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 12:44:08 -0430
Patrick O'Callaghan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 There are two repos, free and non-free.

I actually took a look in the rawhide non-free repo by
going directly to the baseurl in a web browser, and as
near as I can tell, there are not any rpms in the nonfree
repo at this time.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: kdesvn-1.2.1 on F9 and Quanta

2008-11-06 Thread Anthony Messina
On Thursday 06 November 2008 09:14:27 am Rex Dieter wrote:
 File a bug please... http://bugzilla.redhat.com/

Thank you: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470319

-- 
Anthony -  http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery
8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: F10/KDE4.1.2: What is the Show Desktop widget ?

2008-11-06 Thread Colin J Thomson
On Wednesday 05 November 2008 21:17:34 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
 On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 14:04 -0500, Linuxguy123 wrote:
  I just spent some time running the F10/KDE Live CD.  I noticed that
  there is a Show Desktop widget in the widget list.
 You don't know what it's for but it doesn't work?

 Drag it to the desktop. Click on it. Watch the windows disappear. Click
 again. Watch them come back.

 (It would be more useful added to the panel, but I don't see an obvious
 way to get that).

Use the add widget option on the **panel**  choose a widget from the menu, 
then use the add widget option from the menu.

Colin
-- 
Fedora 9 (Sulphur)
Registered Linux user number #342953

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: kdesvn-1.2.1 on F9 and Quanta

2008-11-06 Thread Kevin Kofler
Anthony Messina amessina at messinet.com writes:
 As this is a feature that I use frequently, is there a configuration change I 
 need to make or another perhaps compatibility package I need to use to 
 allow F9's Quanta to continue to use the kde svn features?

It's an expected side effect of the upgrade to KDE 4 kdesvn.

That sort of migration pain is going to happen until everything gets ported.

Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: add menu to the panel (KDE 4.2) ?

2008-11-06 Thread Kevin Kofler
Patrick O'Callaghan pocallaghan at gmail.com writes:
 Right-click on the kicker, select Menu Editor, then Add Submenu.

Please stop calling the KDE 4 panel kicker, that was the old KDE 3 panel.

The panel in KDE 4 is the Plasma panel or just the panel. (Please don't call
it just Plasma either, because the panel is only one part of what Plasma
provides.)

Thanks in advance,
Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


  1   2   >