Fedora User Guide
Fedora User Guide Update The user guide for Fedora 8 has been hidden within the FedoraProject.org wiki for some time now. It has finally been cleaned up and placed neatly in its own page. We have also added a User Guide category under which future UGs should be located. * F8 UG Table of Contents - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F8_User_Guide * Category: User Guide - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:User_Guide * Category: F8 User Guide - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:F8_User_Guide Questions about the user guide can be directed to fedora-docs-l...@redhat.com. The F9, and, hopefully, the F10 user guides should be released in the coming weeks. Matthew Daniels -- _ Reply To: daniel...@gmail.com -- fedora-announce-list mailing list fedora-announce-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-announce-list
December 2008 FESCo Election Results
Election Results for FESCo - Fedora 10 Cycle Voting Period: 07 December 2008 00:00:00 UTC to 20 December 2008 23:59:59 UTC Nominations: * Dan Horák (sharkcz) * Dominik Mierzejewski (rathann) * Jarod Wilson (jwilson) * Jon Stanley (jds2001) * Josh Boyer (jwb) Outcomes: As defined in the election text, the four (4) candidate(s) with the greatest number of votes will be elected for a full, 2 release term. Information: At close of voting there were: 169 valid ballots Using the Fedora Range Voting method, each candidate could attain a maximum of 845 votes (5*169). Results: 1. Josh Boyer (jwb) 489 2. Dan Horák (sharkcz) 485 3. Jarod Wilson (jwilson) 485 4. Jon Stanley (jds2001)453 * 5. Dominik Mierzejewski (rathann) 396 As such, Josh Boyer, Dan Horák, Jarod Wilson and Jon Stanley are elected to FESCo for a 2 release term as of January 7, 2009. Btw, I would like to thank Matt Domsch and Nigel Jones for all the work they did in setting up and running this election. Later, /B -- Brian Pepple bpep...@fedoraproject.org https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bpepple gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-announce-list mailing list fedora-announce-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-announce-list
FAMSCo 2008 Election Result
It's my pleasure to announce the election result for FAmSCo. Here the communication made by Nigel Jones, the Elections Administrator, with the election result: -- Election Results for FAmSCo - Fedora 11 Cycle Voting Period: 07 December 2008 00:00:00 UTC to 20 December 23:59:59 UTC Nominations: * David Nalley (ke4qqq) * Francesco Ugolini (fugolini) * Hector Gonzalez (hagr182) * Joerg Simon (kital) * Larry Cafiero (lcafiero) * Max Spevack (spevack) * Rodrigo Padula (RodrigoPadula) * Sandro Mathys (red_alert) * Susmit Shannigrahi (susmit) * Thomas Canniot (MrTom) Outcomes: As defined in the election text, the seven (7) candidate(s) with the greatest number of votes will be elected for full 2 release term. Information: At close of voting there were: 126 valid ballots Using the Fedora Range Voting method, each candidate could attain a maximum of 1260 votes (10*126). Results: 1. Max Spevack (spevack) 917 2. Joerg Simon (kital) 695 3. Francesco Ugolini (fugolini)684 4. Thomas Canniot (MrTom) 561 5. Rodrigo Padula (RodrigoPadula) 548 6. David Nalley (ke4qqq) 487 7. Susmit Shannigrahi (susmit) 442 * 8. Sandro Mathys (red_alert) 356 9. Larry Cafiero (lcafiero)346 10. Hector Gonzalez (hagr182) 252 As such, Max Spevack, Joerg Simon, Francesco Ugolini, Thomas Canniot, Rodrigo Padula, David Nalley and Susmit Shannigrahi are elected to FAmSCo for a full 2 relase term. Signed, Nigel Jones nigjo...@redhat.com Elections Administrator -- Congratulation to all the winners and big thanks to all the partecipants of this amazing race: your name, along with your ideas, will help next FAmSCo and Ambassadors Project having a better future! Many thanks to Nigel for his precious work and to whoever helped organizing this election. Best regards on behalf of former FAmSCo Francesco Ugolini -- fedora-announce-list mailing list fedora-announce-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-announce-list
December 2008 Fedora Board election results
Election Results for Fedora Board, Fedora 11 Release Cycle Voting Period: 07 December 2008 00:00:00 UTC to 20 December 2008 23:59:59 UTC Nominations: * Bill Nottingham (notting) * David Cantrell (dcantrell) * Dimitris Glezos (glezos) * Jon Stanley (jds2001) * Josh Boyer (jwb) * Matt Domsch (mdomsch) * Michael DeHaan (mpdehaan) Outcomes: As defined in the election text, the two (2) candidate(s) with the greatest number of votes will be elected for a full, 2 release term. Information: At close of voting there were: 227 valid ballots Using the Fedora Range Voting method, each candidate could attain a maximum of 1589 votes (7*227). Results: 1. Bill Nottingham (notting)993 2. Matt Domsch (mdomsch)962 * 3. Dimitris Glezos (glezos) 816 4. Michael DeHaan (mpdehaan)742 5. Jon Stanley (jds2001)691 6. Josh Boyer (jwb) 685 7. David Cantrell (dcantrell) 574 As such, Bill Nottingham and Matt Domsch are elected to the Fedora Board for a 2 release term. I'd like to thank our community for participating in the election, Matt Domsch for his assistance in scheduling town hall meetings for the candidates, and Nigel Jones for his work in setting up and administering the voting process. * * * * * There are a few individuals under consideration for the final appointed Board seat. This appointment is made after elections are completed to balance the Board's composition, and represent the entire Fedora community as much as possible. Although this appointment is ultimately up to the Fedora Project Leader to decide, generally the FPL discusses the appointments with others to achieve a consensus. Because of the impending holidays, the timing of election returns, and lower availability of some Red Hat employees due to both the calendar and recent inclement weather in Westford, I will be delaying the last appointment until after the holidays, so that I have an opportunity to talk with people whose opinions I value. Since the Board does not meet again until after the New Year, the current (pre-election) Board will have its final meeting at the public IRC gathering scheduled for Tuesday, January 6. The next meeting of the Board, on Tuesday, January 13, will be the first meeting of the new Board. -- Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug pgpkknXNI81US.pgp Description: PGP signature -- fedora-announce-list mailing list fedora-announce-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-announce-list
re:wallpaer!!
these are the wallpapers i made and forgot to attach in the previous mail. aplogies for the same. anyways i would like to have your comments and feedback on d wallpapers ! http://jiitlug.googlegroups.com/web/fedora2.png?hl=engsc=xlKsqhYAAABKfX-Y689yOvg82OiFrNVcS7ibph5ftdNh9K_-frBgDg http://jiitlug.googlegroups.com/web/fedora.png?hl=engsc=MgWlthYAAACPCAtMv17zj-tgAuHRJaPQS7ibph5ftdNh9K_-frBgDg -- ANKY ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: Fedora-art-list Digest, Vol 33, Issue 31
fedora-art-list-requ...@redhat.com wrote: Send Fedora-art-list mailing list submissions to fedora-art-list@redhat.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to fedora-art-list-requ...@redhat.com You can reach the person managing the list at fedora-art-list-ow...@redhat.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of Fedora-art-list digest... Today's Topics: 1. Re: wallpaper!! (Pavel Shevchuk) 2. re:wallpaer!! (ANKUR ANAND) -- Message: 1 Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 21:16:45 +0200 From: Pavel Shevchuk stl...@gmail.com Subject: Re: wallpaper!! To: Fedora Art List fedora-art-list@redhat.com Message-ID: d25f375f0812201116l43dbb60blaf81f8a865654...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I guess you forgot to attach wallpaper itself... 2008/12/20 ANKUR ANAND ankurdn...@gmail.com: i made this wallpaper and would like to have your suggestions!! also i am new to FOSS and artwork,, so would like to know more about how to progress and what all steps i should take !!! -- ANKY ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list Its nice and all that, but do you not think that it deviates from the fedora theme and color scheme? ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
[Bug 475593] Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-21 03:20:12 EDT --- fontpackages-1.11-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 475593] Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 471103] Font spacing wrong in menus and text
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471103 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-21 03:34:20 EDT --- openoffice.org-2.4.2-18.3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update openoffice.org'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11549 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 475593] Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-21 03:46:21 EDT --- fontpackages-1.11-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477392] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477392 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2008-12-21 05:11:07 EDT --- Both solutions are probably more user-friendly than packaging latex files anyway. Alternatively, you can check with the doxygen maintainer why the generated latex files do not use system fonts (xetex should be able to do it) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477384] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477384 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2008-12-21 05:18:45 EDT --- The packaging font guidelines apply to all fonts — it's not nice to package private fonts, others would like to use your font too — having private fonts go through the normal packaging process ensures their license is checked properly. All too often private fonts are seen as accessory and packaged even though they violate our licensing rules You always have the option to drop your private font and depend on an existing package such as one of the DejaVu packages, with a symlink if you need one (it's been split so you don't need to pull in the three fonts, just the one you need) It's the same situation as private static libs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477392] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477392 --- Comment #4 from Tim Fenn f...@stanford.edu 2008-12-21 05:38:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Both solutions are probably more user-friendly than packaging latex files anyway. I just yanked the latex files, since when I tried processing them, it bombed with several errors. Alternatively, you can check with the doxygen maintainer why the generated latex files do not use system fonts (xetex should be able to do it) I'll check on this. In the meantime, I'll just include the html files with the rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477380] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477380 Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #2 from Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com 2008-12-21 05:47:03 EDT --- This package has symlinks. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 475593, which changed state. Bug 475593 Summary: Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Bug 477044 depends on bug 477380, which changed state. Bug 477380 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477380 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477426, which changed state. Bug 477426 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477426 What|Old Value |New Value Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477426] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477426 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2008-12-21 05:49:00 EDT --- It is very much a bug for this package. Our packaging guidelines changed in part to remove all the fontconfig scriplet copies in font packages so Behdad has a single place to change them when needed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 473560] Replace bitstream-vera dependencies with dejavu dependencies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473560 Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #1 from Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com 2008-12-21 05:50:07 EDT --- In compare with this package size, bitstream fonts are tiny. But, as they'll be gone in future, new release is referencing dejavu now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477330] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477330 --- Comment #1 from Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org 2008-12-21 06:16:41 EDT --- Done. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1013368 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477330, which changed state. Bug 477330 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477330 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477433] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477433 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2008-12-21 06:48:37 EDT --- The target of this bug is first F11 alpha. Take your time to do things properly and ask on the list if you need more info -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[pkgdb] abyssinica-fonts ownership updated
Package abyssinica-fonts in Fedora OLPC 2 was orphaned by bernie To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/abyssinica-fonts ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[pkgdb] abyssinica-fonts ownership updated
Package abyssinica-fonts in Fedora 9 was orphaned by bernie To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/abyssinica-fonts ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[pkgdb] abyssinica-fonts ownership updated
Package abyssinica-fonts in Fedora 7 was orphaned by bernie To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/abyssinica-fonts ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[pkgdb] nafees-web-naskh-fonts ownership updated
Package nafees-web-naskh-fonts in Fedora devel was orphaned by bernie To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/nafees-web-naskh-fonts ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477448] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477448 --- Comment #2 from Hedayat Vatankhah heda...@grad.com 2008-12-21 07:35:10 EDT --- Yes, this package contains 1 font file, and it is not a font package. So, I think the best thing is to use system fonts. This package currently wants to load a .ttf font (it uses freetype). I wonder what is the best solution here. I might change set the package to use a special font, e.g. one of DejaVU fonts. What's your suggestion?! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[pkgdb] nafees-web-naskh-fonts ownership updated
Package nafees-web-naskh-fonts in Fedora 7 was orphaned by bernie To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/nafees-web-naskh-fonts ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/fontpackages/devel fontpackages.spec, 1.2, 1.3 import.log, 1.2, 1.3
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29824/devel
Modified Files:
fontpackages.spec import.log
Log Message:
fix url
Index: fontpackages.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/fontpackages.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- fontpackages.spec 19 Dec 2008 22:38:08 - 1.2
+++ fontpackages.spec 21 Dec 2008 12:37:56 - 1.3
@@ -3,15 +3,14 @@
Name:fontpackages
Version: 1.12
-Release: 1%{?dist}
+Release: 2%{?dist}
Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages
Group: Development/System
# Mostly means the scriptlets inserted via this package do not change the
# license of the packages they're inserted in
License: LGPLv3+
-# Or git://git.fedorahosted.org/fontpackages.git
-URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Fonts_SIG
+URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages/
Source0:
http://fedorahosted.org/releases/f/o/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XX)
@@ -91,10 +90,12 @@
%changelog
+* Sun Dec 21 2008 Nicolas Mailhot nim at fedoraproject dot org
+- 1.12-2
+â Change homepage
* Fri Dec 19 2008 Nicolas Mailhot nim at fedoraproject dot org
- 1.12-1
⺠Add another macro to allow building fontconfig without cycling
-
* Wed Dec 10 2008 Nicolas Mailhot nim at fedoraproject dot org
- 1.11-1
⺠Add actual fedorahosted references
Index: import.log
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- import.log 19 Dec 2008 22:38:08 - 1.2
+++ import.log 21 Dec 2008 12:37:56 - 1.3
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
fontpackages-1_11-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.11-1.fc11.src.rpm:1229379496
fontpackages-1_12-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.12-1.fc11.src.rpm:1229726060
+fontpackages-1_12-2_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.12-2.fc11.src.rpm:1229863050
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477368] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477368 --- Comment #2 from Patrice Dumas pertu...@free.fr 2008-12-21 09:20:47 EDT --- I had a look and it indeed makes sense to split out the fonts. This means * reviewing separately the i18n-fonts package which should not be a problem * reviewing separately ogonkify which may be a bit more complicated (I just spotted an afm from adobe with all rights reserved...), and make sure that the ogokify from a2ps is not used. When I reviewed a2ps I verified that ogonkify in a2ps and upstream was the same, maybe this should be reverified. * adjusting the paths in a2ps (maybe in a2ps-4.13-etc.patch) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477368] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477368 --- Comment #3 from Patrice Dumas pertu...@free.fr 2008-12-21 09:35:43 EDT --- i18n fonts are at (no home page as far as I can tell): ftp://ftp.enst.fr/pub/unix/a2ps/i18n-fonts-0.1.tar.gz ogonkify seems to be a: http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/ogonkify/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477397] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477397 --- Comment #3 from Patrice Dumas pertu...@free.fr 2008-12-21 10:10:13 EDT --- Also are there type1 variants of DejaVu fonts in fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477397] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477397 --- Comment #2 from Patrice Dumas pertu...@free.fr 2008-12-21 10:09:34 EDT --- Looking at the font files, there is: Notice (Copyright (c) 2003 by Bitstream, Inc. All Rights Reserved.) %Copyright: Copyright (c) 2003 by Bitstream, Inc. All Rights Reserved. %Copyright: DejaVu changes are in public domain Comment Copyright URW Software, Copyright 1997 by URW Comment Creation Date: 10/21/1999 Comment See the file COPYING (GNU General Public License) for license conditions. % Copyright URW Software, Copyright 1997 by URW % URW Software, Copyright 1997 by URW % See the file COPYING (GNU General Public License) for license conditions. % As a special exception, permission is granted to include this font % program in a Postscript or PDF file that consists of a document that % contains text to be displayed or printed using this font, regardless % of the conditions or license applying to the document itself. So it looks like those fonts were taken from elsewhere, though it is not completly clear to me where they come from. grepping in /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/ doesn't exactly lead to the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477397] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477397 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2008-12-21 10:25:54 EDT --- That seems the typical font licensing mess. I don't even want to look at it, that's something for spot if you want to keep those files. Do you really need the files in Type1 form? I suppose it may be possible to convert DejaVu to Type1 at build time, though since the Type1 format is very limited, that will be a huge mess with quality loss and conflicts with the main dejavu truetype fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477435] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477435 --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com 2008-12-21 11:08:06 EDT --- I imagine this is due to the inclusion of /usr/lib/openoffice.org/basis3.0/share/fonts/truetype/opens___.ttf which is the very openoffice.org-specific opensymbol font which provides some dingbat symbols which are used with a magic conversion table to provide conversions for wingdings for msoffice import and for conversion of the even more obscure starbats font from old versions of StarOffice documents. Its definitely not a general-purpose font, and I'm not sure it has value outside OpenOffice.org, its more a means-to-an-end to support a conversion mechanism for wingdings and starbats. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477435] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477435 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2008-12-21 11:18:14 EDT --- I'm quite sure it has value for all our other office apps which need to deal with OO.o documents that reference this font (of course I hope SUN did use unicode encoding, but even if they didn't, as long as there are documents that reference this, it's not a good idea to keep it private) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.51, 1.52 dejavu-fonts.spec, 1.91, 1.92 import.log, 1.8, 1.9 sources, 1.51, 1.52 dejavu-fonts-2.26-fontconfig.patch, 1.1, NONE
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16908/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore dejavu-fonts.spec import.log sources
Removed Files:
dejavu-fonts-2.26-fontconfig.patch
Log Message:
2.28
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.51
retrieving revision 1.52
diff -u -r1.51 -r1.52
--- .cvsignore 17 Dec 2008 20:11:02 - 1.51
+++ .cvsignore 21 Dec 2008 17:18:47 - 1.52
@@ -1 +1 @@
-dejavu-fonts-2.27.tar.bz2
+dejavu-fonts-2.28.tar.bz2
Index: dejavu-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/dejavu-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.91
retrieving revision 1.92
diff -u -r1.91 -r1.92
--- dejavu-fonts.spec 17 Dec 2008 20:11:02 - 1.91
+++ dejavu-fonts.spec 21 Dec 2008 17:18:48 - 1.92
@@ -27,15 +27,14 @@
Name:%{fontname}-fonts
-Version: 2.27
-Release: 7%{?alphatag}%{?dist}
+Version: 2.28
+Release: 1%{?alphatag}%{?dist}
Summary: DejaVu fonts
Group: User Interface/X
License: Bitstream Vera and Public Domain
URL: http://%{fontname}.sf.net/
Source0:
%{?!alphatag:http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{fontname}}%{?alphatag:%{fontname}.sourceforge.net/snapshots}/%{archivename}.tar.bz2
-Patch0:%{name}-2.26-fontconfig.patch
BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XX)
# Older fontforge versions will not work due to sfd format changes
@@ -52,7 +51,7 @@
%package compat
-Summary: DejaVu fonts, compatibility
+Summary: DejaVu fonts compatibility package
Group: User Interface/X
Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts 2.26-3
@@ -65,7 +64,7 @@
%package lgc-compat
-Summary: DejaVu fonts, LGC compatibility
+Summary: DejaVu fonts, LGC compatibility package
Group: User Interface/X
Obsoletes: dejavu-lgc-fonts 2.26-3
@@ -77,7 +76,7 @@
%package common
-Summary: DejaVu fonts, common files (documentationâ¦)
+Summary: Common files for Dejavu fonts (documentationâ¦)
Group:User Interface/X
Requires: fontpackages-filesystem
@@ -90,7 +89,7 @@
%package sans
-Summary: DejaVu, variable-width sans-serif font faces
+Summary: Variable-width sans-serif font faces
Group:User Interface/X
Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
@@ -107,7 +106,7 @@
%package serif
-Summary: DejaVu, variable-width serif font faces
+Summary: Variable-width serif font faces
Group:User Interface/X
Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
@@ -124,7 +123,7 @@
%package sans-mono
-Summary: DejaVu, monospace sans-serif font faces
+Summary: Monospace sans-serif font faces
Group:User Interface/X
Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
@@ -141,7 +140,7 @@
%package lgc-sans
-Summary: DejaVu, variable-width sans-serif font faces, Latin-Greek-Cyrillic
subset
+Summary: Variable-width sans-serif font faces, Latin-Greek-Cyrillic subset
Group:User Interface/X
Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
@@ -157,7 +156,7 @@
%package lgc-serif
-Summary: DejaVu, variable-width serif font faces, Latin-Greek-Cyrillic subset
+Summary: Variable-width serif font faces, Latin-Greek-Cyrillic subset
Group:User Interface/X
Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
@@ -173,7 +172,7 @@
%package lgc-sans-mono
-Summary: DejaVu, monospace sans-serif font faces, Latin-Greek-Cyrillic subset
+Summary: Monospace sans-serif font faces, Latin-Greek-Cyrillic subset
Group:User Interface/X
Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
@@ -190,7 +189,6 @@
%prep
%setup -q -n %{archivename}
-%patch0 -p1
%build
@@ -239,6 +237,13 @@
%changelog
+* Sun Dec 21 2008 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
+- 2.28-1
+â Update to latest release
+â
Drop upstreamed fontconfig patch
+â Remove DejaVu from most summaries
+
+
* Sat Dec 6 2008 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
- 2.27-7
ß¹ Add explicit conflicts to help yum
Index: import.log
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9
--- import.log 17 Dec 2008 20:11:02 - 1.8
+++ import.log 21 Dec 2008 17:18:48 - 1.9
@@ -6,3 +6,4 @@
dejavu-fonts-2_26-5_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-5.fc11.src.rpm:1226174018
dejavu-fonts-2_26-6_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-6.fc11.src.rpm:1226221359
dejavu-fonts-2_27-7_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.27-7.fc11.src.rpm:1229544635
+dejavu-fonts-2_28-1_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.28-1.fc11.src.rpm:1229879833
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.51
retrieving revision 1.52
diff -u -r1.51 -r1.52
--- sources 17 Dec
[Bug 477431] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477431 --- Comment #4 from Karen Pease m...@daughtersoftiresias.org 2008-12-21 13:06:47 EDT --- Okay, well, I'll work on it whenever I find a way to get access to the repository working again... as noted in another bug report, I get: Permission denied (publickey). cvs [commit aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477397] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477397 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2008-12-21 15:08:13 EDT --- It all looks like pfa forks of well-known (gs/urw/xorg/dejavu) fonts Unfortunately those fonts seems all one-of-a-kind So assuming they're all legit license-wise, you'll probably have to package them yourself It's a pity upstream spent time making its own fonts instead of supporting modern (TTF/OTF/fontconfig) standards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477397] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477397 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2008-12-21 15:32:49 EDT --- Thinking about it some more, the correct plan for the htmldoc packager(s) is probably: 1. long-term: ask upstream to move to fontconfig/freetype/pango/cairo 2. short-term: * ask upstream what its original font sources were * if those fonts exist in type1 form in Fedora, link them from here * if those fonts do not exist in type1 form in Fedora, but have some other canonical type1 source, package this source properly * if they're strictly an htmldoc production, and have no other proper source (and it can be acertained no license was hurt during their production) package them as htmldoc sub-packages (one per font family). Assuming upstream was smart enough to use its own font names and didn't re-use the name of someone else's font (in which case the fonts need to be rename or they'll conflict with the real fonts). The subpackage logic can be taken from /etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate-fonts-multi.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477406] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477406 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2008-12-21 16:22:11 EDT --- $ rpm -ql kdeedu | grep ttf /usr/share/kde4/apps/blinken/fonts/steve.ttf /usr/share/kde4/apps/khangman/fonts/Domestic_Manners.ttf /usr/share/kde4/apps/khangman/fonts/Dustismo_Roman.ttf Per Kevin's investigation, looks like these use sjfonts, dustismo-fonts, respectively, per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Steve_Hand_fonts https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Dustimo_fonts other links: http://www.dustismo.com/ (down?) http://ospublish.constantvzw.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477407] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477407 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2008-12-21 16:26:27 EDT --- $ rpm -ql kdelibs | grep ttf /usr/share/kde4/apps/formulashape/fonts/Arev.ttf /usr/share/kde4/apps/formulashape/fonts/ArevBI.ttf /usr/share/kde4/apps/formulashape/fonts/ArevBd.ttf /usr/share/kde4/apps/formulashape/fonts/ArevIt.ttf /usr/share/kde4/apps/formulashape/fonts/cmex10.ttf These look like http://dejavu.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Bitstream_Vera_derivatives#Arev_Fonts - The standard characters from Arev have been merged into DejaVu, but there are mathematical characters in the Private Use Area. And cmex10 is from tex and/or mathml-fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477409] koffice: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477409 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Please convert to new font |koffice: Please convert to |packaging guidelines|new font packaging ||guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477423] mathml-fonts: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477423 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477423] mathml-fonts: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477423 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Please convert to new font |mathml-fonts: Please |packaging guidelines|convert to new font ||packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #34 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2008-12-21 16:43:51 EDT --- [This is a simplified version of the message sent to every package maintainer that ships TTF/OTF/Type1 fonts in Fedora.] Our font packaging guidelines have now changed. New font package submissions must now be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_(2008-12-21) has been submitted for FPC and FESCO approval today. The new templates should make the creation of font packages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager in fedora-devel and can serve as examples: ❄ abyssinica-fonts ❄ andika-fonts ❄ apanov-heuristica-fonts ❄ bitstream-vera-fonts ❄ charis-fonts ❄ dejavu-fonts ❄ ecolier-court-fonts ❄ edrip-fonts ❄ gfs-ambrosia-fonts ❄ gfs-artemisia-fonts ❄ gfs-baskerville-fonts ❄ gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ❄ gfs-bodoni-fonts ❄ gfs-complutum-fonts ❄ gfs-didot-classic-fonts ❄ gfs-didot-fonts ❄ gfs-eustace-fonts ❄ gfs-fleischman-fonts ❄ gfs-garaldus-fonts ❄ gfs-gazis-fonts ❄ gfs-jackson-fonts ❄ gfs-neohellenic-fonts ❄ gfs-nicefore-fonts ❄ gfs-olga-fonts ❄ gfs-porson-fonts ❄ gfs-solomos-fonts ❄ gfs-theokritos-fonts ❄ nafees-web-naskh-fonts ❄ stix-fonts ❄ yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts The new spec templates have been designed to be easy to update to from the previous guidelines, and to remove complexity from font packages. To help new package creation the fontpackages-devel package has been made available in Fedora 9 and 10. If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2008-12-21 16:43:59 EDT --- [This is a simplified version of the message sent to every package maintainer that ships TTF/OTF/Type1 fonts in Fedora.] Our font packaging guidelines have now changed. New font package submissions must now be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_(2008-12-21) has been submitted for FPC and FESCO approval today. The new templates should make the creation of font packages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager in fedora-devel and can serve as examples: ❄ abyssinica-fonts ❄ andika-fonts ❄ apanov-heuristica-fonts ❄ bitstream-vera-fonts ❄ charis-fonts ❄ dejavu-fonts ❄ ecolier-court-fonts ❄ edrip-fonts ❄ gfs-ambrosia-fonts ❄ gfs-artemisia-fonts ❄ gfs-baskerville-fonts ❄ gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ❄ gfs-bodoni-fonts ❄ gfs-complutum-fonts ❄ gfs-didot-classic-fonts ❄ gfs-didot-fonts ❄ gfs-eustace-fonts ❄ gfs-fleischman-fonts ❄ gfs-garaldus-fonts ❄ gfs-gazis-fonts ❄ gfs-jackson-fonts ❄ gfs-neohellenic-fonts ❄ gfs-nicefore-fonts ❄ gfs-olga-fonts ❄ gfs-porson-fonts ❄ gfs-solomos-fonts ❄ gfs-theokritos-fonts ❄ nafees-web-naskh-fonts ❄ stix-fonts ❄ yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts The new spec templates have been designed to be easy to update to from the previous guidelines, and to remove complexity from font packages. To help new package creation the fontpackages-devel package has been made available in Fedora 9 and 10. If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts - Mothanna-fonts from Arabeyes.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2008-12-21 16:43:53 EDT --- [This is a simplified version of the message sent to every package maintainer that ships TTF/OTF/Type1 fonts in Fedora.] Our font packaging guidelines have now changed. New font package submissions must now be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_(2008-12-21) has been submitted for FPC and FESCO approval today. The new templates should make the creation of font packages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager in fedora-devel and can serve as examples: ❄ abyssinica-fonts ❄ andika-fonts ❄ apanov-heuristica-fonts ❄ bitstream-vera-fonts ❄ charis-fonts ❄ dejavu-fonts ❄ ecolier-court-fonts ❄ edrip-fonts ❄ gfs-ambrosia-fonts ❄ gfs-artemisia-fonts ❄ gfs-baskerville-fonts ❄ gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ❄ gfs-bodoni-fonts ❄ gfs-complutum-fonts ❄ gfs-didot-classic-fonts ❄ gfs-didot-fonts ❄ gfs-eustace-fonts ❄ gfs-fleischman-fonts ❄ gfs-garaldus-fonts ❄ gfs-gazis-fonts ❄ gfs-jackson-fonts ❄ gfs-neohellenic-fonts ❄ gfs-nicefore-fonts ❄ gfs-olga-fonts ❄ gfs-porson-fonts ❄ gfs-solomos-fonts ❄ gfs-theokritos-fonts ❄ nafees-web-naskh-fonts ❄ stix-fonts ❄ yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts The new spec templates have been designed to be easy to update to from the previous guidelines, and to remove complexity from font packages. To help new package creation the fontpackages-devel package has been made available in Fedora 9 and 10. If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 456527] Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2008-12-21 16:43:44 EDT --- [This is a simplified version of the message sent to every package maintainer that ships TTF/OTF/Type1 fonts in Fedora.] Our font packaging guidelines have now changed. New font package submissions must now be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_(2008-12-21) has been submitted for FPC and FESCO approval today. The new templates should make the creation of font packages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager in fedora-devel and can serve as examples: ❄ abyssinica-fonts ❄ andika-fonts ❄ apanov-heuristica-fonts ❄ bitstream-vera-fonts ❄ charis-fonts ❄ dejavu-fonts ❄ ecolier-court-fonts ❄ edrip-fonts ❄ gfs-ambrosia-fonts ❄ gfs-artemisia-fonts ❄ gfs-baskerville-fonts ❄ gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ❄ gfs-bodoni-fonts ❄ gfs-complutum-fonts ❄ gfs-didot-classic-fonts ❄ gfs-didot-fonts ❄ gfs-eustace-fonts ❄ gfs-fleischman-fonts ❄ gfs-garaldus-fonts ❄ gfs-gazis-fonts ❄ gfs-jackson-fonts ❄ gfs-neohellenic-fonts ❄ gfs-nicefore-fonts ❄ gfs-olga-fonts ❄ gfs-porson-fonts ❄ gfs-solomos-fonts ❄ gfs-theokritos-fonts ❄ nafees-web-naskh-fonts ❄ stix-fonts ❄ yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts The new spec templates have been designed to be easy to update to from the previous guidelines, and to remove complexity from font packages. To help new package creation the fontpackages-devel package has been made available in Fedora 9 and 10. If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 467507] Review Request: Rufscript-fonts - Rufscripts is a decorative handwriting based font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467507 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2008-12-21 16:43:57 EDT --- [This is a simplified version of the message sent to every package maintainer that ships TTF/OTF/Type1 fonts in Fedora.] Our font packaging guidelines have now changed. New font package submissions must now be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_(2008-12-21) has been submitted for FPC and FESCO approval today. The new templates should make the creation of font packages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager in fedora-devel and can serve as examples: ❄ abyssinica-fonts ❄ andika-fonts ❄ apanov-heuristica-fonts ❄ bitstream-vera-fonts ❄ charis-fonts ❄ dejavu-fonts ❄ ecolier-court-fonts ❄ edrip-fonts ❄ gfs-ambrosia-fonts ❄ gfs-artemisia-fonts ❄ gfs-baskerville-fonts ❄ gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ❄ gfs-bodoni-fonts ❄ gfs-complutum-fonts ❄ gfs-didot-classic-fonts ❄ gfs-didot-fonts ❄ gfs-eustace-fonts ❄ gfs-fleischman-fonts ❄ gfs-garaldus-fonts ❄ gfs-gazis-fonts ❄ gfs-jackson-fonts ❄ gfs-neohellenic-fonts ❄ gfs-nicefore-fonts ❄ gfs-olga-fonts ❄ gfs-porson-fonts ❄ gfs-solomos-fonts ❄ gfs-theokritos-fonts ❄ nafees-web-naskh-fonts ❄ stix-fonts ❄ yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts The new spec templates have been designed to be easy to update to from the previous guidelines, and to remove complexity from font packages. To help new package creation the fontpackages-devel package has been made available in Fedora 9 and 10. If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477406] kdeedu: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477406 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Please convert to new font |kdeedu: Please convert to |packaging guidelines|new font packaging ||guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477407] kdelibs: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477407 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2008-12-21 16:57:17 EDT --- 1. If DejaVu is not good enough for kde, please submit an Arev font package and then depend on it 2. Likewise we have a ton of math fonts in the distro (asana, stix…) but if those are not good enough please submit a font package for cmex10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477551] New: RFE Add fontconfig file checking
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: RFE Add fontconfig file checking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477551 Summary: RFE Add fontconfig file checking Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: rpmlint AssignedTo: ville.sky...@iki.fi ReportedBy: nicolas.mail...@laposte.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: wo...@nobugconsulting.ro, t...@pobox.com, ville.sky...@iki.fi, fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora As suggested by Jens Petersen the package review tools such as rpm should be enhanced to check fontconfig files provided by packagers are well-formed. This check could take two forms: 1. check that all the files in %_fontconfig_templatedir are well-formed-XML 2. check that they conform to the current fontconfig DTD (this test probably requires for the fontconfig packager to register it in the system XML catalogs but Behdad is working on a new release right now so that's a good time to ask) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 466193] Review Request: alee-fonts - Korean TrueType Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466193 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2008-12-21 16:43:55 EDT --- [This is a simplified version of the message sent to every package maintainer that ships TTF/OTF/Type1 fonts in Fedora.] Our font packaging guidelines have now changed. New font package submissions must now be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_(2008-12-21) has been submitted for FPC and FESCO approval today. The new templates should make the creation of font packages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager in fedora-devel and can serve as examples: ❄ abyssinica-fonts ❄ andika-fonts ❄ apanov-heuristica-fonts ❄ bitstream-vera-fonts ❄ charis-fonts ❄ dejavu-fonts ❄ ecolier-court-fonts ❄ edrip-fonts ❄ gfs-ambrosia-fonts ❄ gfs-artemisia-fonts ❄ gfs-baskerville-fonts ❄ gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ❄ gfs-bodoni-fonts ❄ gfs-complutum-fonts ❄ gfs-didot-classic-fonts ❄ gfs-didot-fonts ❄ gfs-eustace-fonts ❄ gfs-fleischman-fonts ❄ gfs-garaldus-fonts ❄ gfs-gazis-fonts ❄ gfs-jackson-fonts ❄ gfs-neohellenic-fonts ❄ gfs-nicefore-fonts ❄ gfs-olga-fonts ❄ gfs-porson-fonts ❄ gfs-solomos-fonts ❄ gfs-theokritos-fonts ❄ nafees-web-naskh-fonts ❄ stix-fonts ❄ yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts The new spec templates have been designed to be easy to update to from the previous guidelines, and to remove complexity from font packages. To help new package creation the fontpackages-devel package has been made available in Fedora 9 and 10. If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477406] kdeedu: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477406 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2008-12-21 16:59:38 EDT --- Those are all in the Fedora wishlist. Clean packages would be appreciated (and would made the fonts available to all the fontconfig apps) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2008-12-21 16:43:48 EDT --- [This is a simplified version of the message sent to every package maintainer that ships TTF/OTF/Type1 fonts in Fedora.] Our font packaging guidelines have now changed. New font package submissions must now be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_(2008-12-21) has been submitted for FPC and FESCO approval today. The new templates should make the creation of font packages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager in fedora-devel and can serve as examples: ❄ abyssinica-fonts ❄ andika-fonts ❄ apanov-heuristica-fonts ❄ bitstream-vera-fonts ❄ charis-fonts ❄ dejavu-fonts ❄ ecolier-court-fonts ❄ edrip-fonts ❄ gfs-ambrosia-fonts ❄ gfs-artemisia-fonts ❄ gfs-baskerville-fonts ❄ gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ❄ gfs-bodoni-fonts ❄ gfs-complutum-fonts ❄ gfs-didot-classic-fonts ❄ gfs-didot-fonts ❄ gfs-eustace-fonts ❄ gfs-fleischman-fonts ❄ gfs-garaldus-fonts ❄ gfs-gazis-fonts ❄ gfs-jackson-fonts ❄ gfs-neohellenic-fonts ❄ gfs-nicefore-fonts ❄ gfs-olga-fonts ❄ gfs-porson-fonts ❄ gfs-solomos-fonts ❄ gfs-theokritos-fonts ❄ nafees-web-naskh-fonts ❄ stix-fonts ❄ yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts The new spec templates have been designed to be easy to update to from the previous guidelines, and to remove complexity from font packages. To help new package creation the fontpackages-devel package has been made available in Fedora 9 and 10. If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457709] Review Request: perizia-fonts - English asymmetric font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457709 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2008-12-21 16:43:46 EDT --- [This is a simplified version of the message sent to every package maintainer that ships TTF/OTF/Type1 fonts in Fedora.] Our font packaging guidelines have now changed. New font package submissions must now be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_(2008-12-21) has been submitted for FPC and FESCO approval today. The new templates should make the creation of font packages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager in fedora-devel and can serve as examples: ❄ abyssinica-fonts ❄ andika-fonts ❄ apanov-heuristica-fonts ❄ bitstream-vera-fonts ❄ charis-fonts ❄ dejavu-fonts ❄ ecolier-court-fonts ❄ edrip-fonts ❄ gfs-ambrosia-fonts ❄ gfs-artemisia-fonts ❄ gfs-baskerville-fonts ❄ gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ❄ gfs-bodoni-fonts ❄ gfs-complutum-fonts ❄ gfs-didot-classic-fonts ❄ gfs-didot-fonts ❄ gfs-eustace-fonts ❄ gfs-fleischman-fonts ❄ gfs-garaldus-fonts ❄ gfs-gazis-fonts ❄ gfs-jackson-fonts ❄ gfs-neohellenic-fonts ❄ gfs-nicefore-fonts ❄ gfs-olga-fonts ❄ gfs-porson-fonts ❄ gfs-solomos-fonts ❄ gfs-theokritos-fonts ❄ nafees-web-naskh-fonts ❄ stix-fonts ❄ yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts The new spec templates have been designed to be easy to update to from the previous guidelines, and to remove complexity from font packages. To help new package creation the fontpackages-devel package has been made available in Fedora 9 and 10. If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477384] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477384 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams ivazquez...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NOTABUG |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams ivazquez...@gmail.com 2008-12-21 18:28:13 EDT --- Alright, I tore out the private font since its license is unsuitable for Fedora, and made feh use DejaVu Sans instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #23 from Martin-Gomez Pablo pablo.martin-go...@laposte.net 2008-12-21 18:39:29 EDT --- I have some problems with a /home partition corrupted currently. I will try to review this this week. It seems that we are near to the end of the review :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477371] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371 --- Comment #2 from Victor Bogado bog...@bogado.net 2008-12-21 18:53:42 EDT --- I have several problems to create a package for this font. - This font is not complete, it only has the main characters. - The font has been altered for the game, for it didn't even had numbers. - The upstream site does not have a download link, in fact the site is in flash and I cannot even put a link to the font page. The only solution I can see for this is the following, create a sub package for the game that packages only the font. So the upstream becomes the altered font for the game. My opinion is that the incomplete font is not very useful for much else then the game, that's why I packaged it with the game ignoring the avoid bundling font... rule. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 378338] Deal with X servers which misreport the screen's dimensions
If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378338 gnome-control-center | settings-daemon | Ver: trunk Ryan Hayle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hac...@walkingfish.com --- Comment #50 from Ryan Hayle 2008-12-22 00:39 UTC --- What is the status of this bug? It is marked fixed, and hasn't had any activity in over a year, yet GNOME 2.24.1 (at least in Ubuntu 8.10) still seems to default to 96 DPI regardless of my physical screen DPI. Is this Ubuntu-specific? I would very much like to see this bug resolved, as currently only one of my 4 displays runs at 96 DPI. My laptop is at 147 dpi, and my netbook is 134. I agree with all the arguments made by Nicolas Mailhot above, and hope this will get fixed soon! -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378338. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477397] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477397 --- Comment #8 from Adam Goode a...@spicenitz.org 2008-12-21 21:10:14 EDT --- Any day now I am expecting twins to arrive, so I don't think I will have enough time to properly address this issue. Anyone who would like to fix this problem if very welcome to co-maintain! :) Besides this issue, the package is basically stable and low-maintenance. It comes from the same upstream as CUPS. (Not sure if that's changed since the Apple deal.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 462038] Hotkeys has no response and Go To window couldn't be inputted.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(ccha...@redhat.co ||m) --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2008-12-21 22:59:48 EDT --- Can you test the latest build in rahide when you have time, Caius? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 462038] Hotkeys has no response and Go To window couldn't be inputted.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038 Caius CHANCE ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(ccha...@redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #11 from Caius CHANCE ccha...@redhat.com 2008-12-22 01:33:42 EDT --- It worked on my rawhide (F10 + yum update to rawhide), on 22 Dec 2008. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477458] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477451] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477451 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Font package splitting clarification
Hi all, Since the discussion on font package splitting rules seems to be exhausted, and since no one stepped up with an obviously better proposal than mine, I've queued the following FPC-side: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_(2008-12-21) I've tried to integrate all the exceptions that were brought up during the discussion and that were consensual, and to separate the rules from their rationale (so packagers in a hurry only need to read the first part). I've ended up with four simple master rules that should not be open to interpretation. Best regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée ___ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
Help with new font packaging guidelines (choosing font family)
Hi, I'm trying to convert my packages (jomolhari-fonts, tibetan-machine-uni-fonts) to new font packaging guidelines. I've encounter one problem that stops me from filling all guidelines. I don't know the right font family (serif, sans serif, other?) for both fonts, so I can't create a fontconf files. How can I find/known this font family (both fonts represents Tibetan script which I don't know)? BTW. If both fonts are installed TMU is selected as a primary font for displaying Dzongkha text, is there a way to set fontconfig to prefer Jomolhari when dealing with Dzongkha text and TMU when displaying Tibetan text (Jomolhari is better for Dzongkha text and TMU for Tibetan text). -- Best regards Marcin Garski ___ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
Noisy cron
Could somebody start looking into the noisy cron jobs? We seem to have quite a few that are failing or spitting unnecessary text out into email. Could be a fun project for somebody looking to get familiar with Infrastructure, since the jobs seem to span all parts of our realm. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: 1-second kernel
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au wrote: Tim: Five seconds is probably ambitious, but I still like how my old Amiga would COLD BOOT in 13 seconds, warm boot was 11 seconds. That's from off, to fully working system. g: also, think about how much memory you had and was it 8 bit. hard drives? No, not 8 bits. ;-) But there was an efficiency about it that isn't around these days: You didn't make something multi-megabyte unless you had to. You don't run a server unless you have to (right now, or at all). Such as print servers if you don't need them, nor until you actually go to print. Interesting discussion There are two places to pay critical attention to first: A. hardware initialization. For a system to boot all hardware has to be known in advance. NO probes that time out for this and that... SCSI timers are LONG... No probe of USB this and that. To that end building a kernel with your devices built in it can help. Exclude any driver that you do not have hardware for. Keep a vanilla kitchen sink kernel everything kernel as a safety net. Perhaps on a USB or LiveCD. B. Network timers. Network timers are much longer than we all expect... Ensure that all name servers and network knowledge that can be hardwired is. No DHCP no discovery of name servers. Snoop the net (dumb hub, second machine) and watch for timeouts and other traffic you do not expect. As others indicated most but not all services can be disabled and started later. sudo service cups start can be run long after you login. For example X11 takes a lot longer to start than I expect.. in part because the window manager desktop has all sorts of live buttons and widgets. Clean up as much as you can without X11 i.e. login on a simple text window... and use 'startx'... It is possible to use 'find' to discover all the files that have been accessed (opened) do an audit and find out why for each of them... all libs all programs... Profile anything that might run prior to a shell prompt you can in isolation. Simplify all that you can. -- NiftyFedora T o m M i t c h e l l -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Comcast permanent block on port 25
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 6:53 AM, tom tfree...@intel.digichem.net wrote: On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 16:00:29 -0600, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote: The low cost residential account comes with terms that say you won't run servers on it. If you aren't running a server, it doesn't matter much if they block port 25 or not. Except whether or not you run a server has little to do with how much it costs them to provide that service. And this there was actual competition, that wouldn't be able to get away with that artificial market segmentation. Sorry to chime in late. But... I agree with your point, and find our mutual position pointless. You enter into an agreement with the isp. Live up to your end of the agreement. Also late... Port 25 in and out may be negotiated in some areas... The default in my area was to block it but a polite call to SBC unblocked it for me. I still had issues at the other end as my reverse DNS was known home DHCP class sites and I had to use them as a 'smart' host. HTTP is more interesting... as it can be a business but without a fixed IP address dynamic DNS is seen as wonky ... However a personal site with limited traffic can also serve students homework. But it need not be on port 80. Look into various hosting or co-location solutions some are much less expensive than good bandwidth to the home. I recently moved and the home network solution here sux and is expensive. Time for me to write a note to my state regulators. -- NiftyFedora T o m M i t c h e l l -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: PackageKit has eaten my system (again!)
On Sat, 2008-12-20 at 22:36 +0100, DB wrote: I just did the latest batch of F9 PackageKit updates - with disastrous effect! (See attached list) I don't see how applying the updates removed yum. Did you try removing yum manually? Richard. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Hidden download performance problem with Fedora 6-10
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Joshua C. joshua...@googlemail.com wrote: +1 I've seen really fast mirrors but when it comes to update the speed drops to ~300kbps. when directly downloading from a mirror I get ~ 1,6mbps. with other distro I haven't seen this, though. it is not a connection problem but a fedora problem (I think). if i can assist, let me know. 2008/12/19, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com: On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 10:39:31 -0800 Chuck ctl...@gmail.com wrote: I have not used Fedora because of the following issue. I get VERY SLOW performance or hangs when downloading from repositories etc. on every Fedora version I have tried. I have seen users raising this issue since Fedora Core 4. So I can't use Fedora; but would like to. I apologize for the length of the message. I have tried the Forum but got no help there. ...snip... Non-stop. Just over an hour duration. Full speed and ON THE VERY SAME HARDWARE. It appears that there is a bandwidth shaper involved ... It is not uncommon for ISPs to hobble links when they detect some types of download. Also when packets are lost the link speed and TCP/IP window for the download is reshaped. One Vista I see what you see so I am inclined to believe that the network has issues. I would use the bandwidth limits of curl or wget to see if I can keep under the rate that triggers packet loss or detection triggers. -- NiftyFedora T o m M i t c h e l l -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
RE: FC10 does not boot when HDD moved to another machine
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: Frank Millman wrote: Still no luck, I am afraid. This is what I have done. #chroot /mnt/sysimage. 'uname -r' shows 2.6.27.5-117.fc10.i586 I ran 'mkinitrd -v /boot/test.img 2.6.27.5-117.fc10.i586'. I put the -v in to see what was happening, but it just returns to the prompt silently. I think that should be: mkinitrd -v /boot/test.img 2.6.27.5-117.fc10 (no .586) #ls /boot shows nothing - I don't think it is mounted. easy fix - mount /boot after running chroot. I am surprised that you did not get an error when it could not find the kernel. No modules available for kernel 2.6.27.5-117.fc10.i586 Thanks for your patience, Mikkel. I think I am getting closer. I tried the suggestion of running 'yum update kernel' while in rescue mode on the second machine. It seemed to work, but it still would not boot. I put the drive back in the original machine, and it booted ok. The problem with X freezing seems to have gone away, so I will use it in this machine as originally intended. However, I would still like to complete the exercise of getting it to boot in the other machine. (Aarhg, I spoke to soon! I just tried it again and it has frozen. However, that is a topic for another thread ...) I ran 'yum update', which updated 53 packages. As mentioned I had previously run 'yum update kernel'. The kernel now seems to be 2.6.27.7-134.fc10.i686. However, uname -r still shows 2.6.27.5-117.fc10.i586. What is the official way of finding out which kernel is running? I ran mkinitrd on the original machine, just to see if it would work. If I type 'mkinitrd -v /boot/test.img 2.6.27.7-134.fc10' (without the .i686), I get the message 'No modules available ...' If I include the '.i686', it works, and creates /boot/test.img. I don't know how to tell it to use the new image. Is there a way to change boot options without booting off the intstallation dvd and selecting 'rescue mode'? I did boot in rescue mode, and tried 'initrd=test.img' and 'initrd=/boot/test.img', but in both cases it said it could not find test.img. You mentioned modifying grub.conf, but I do not have a grub directory in /boot at all. There is an an entry in /etc for grub.conf, but it is a link to /boot/grub/grub.conf, so it cannot find it. I then moved the HDD back to the second machine and booted in rescue mode. This time 'ls /boot' did show the contents correctly - the previous problem where it did not seem to be mounted has gone away. I ran mkinitrd and it worked, but I still don't know how to tell it to use the new image. I tried saving '/boot/initrd-2.6.27.7-134.fc10.i686.img', and then copying 'test.img' over it, but when I tried booting normally I got the original error message - Volume group VolGroup00 not found Unable to access resume device (/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol01) mount: error mounting /dev/root on /sysroot as ext3: No such file or directory I suspect that I am closer, and my problem now is that I don't know how to tell it to use the new image. Hopefully someone can give me a nudge in the right direction. Thanks again Frank -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: dbus preventing system-config-services from running
On Sun, 2008-12-21 at 08:53 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: upgrade also processes Obsoletes tags. You should always use upgrade. According to /etc/yum.conf that's already done. obsoletes=1 -- [...@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.7-53.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: FC10 does not boot when HDD moved to another machine
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 8:36 AM, Frank Millman fr...@chagford.com wrote:
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Frank Millman wrote:
Still no luck, I am afraid. This is what I have done.
#chroot /mnt/sysimage.
'uname -r' shows 2.6.27.5-117.fc10.i586
I ran 'mkinitrd -v /boot/test.img 2.6.27.5-117.fc10.i586'.
I put the
-v in to see what was happening, but it just returns to the
prompt silently.
I think that should be:
mkinitrd -v /boot/test.img 2.6.27.5-117.fc10
(no .586)
#ls /boot shows nothing - I don't think it is mounted.
easy fix - mount /boot after running chroot.
I am surprised that you did not get an error when it could
not find the kernel.
No modules available for kernel 2.6.27.5-117.fc10.i586
Thanks for your patience, Mikkel. I think I am getting closer.
I tried the suggestion of running 'yum update kernel' while in rescue mode
on the second machine. It seemed to work, but it still would not boot.
I put the drive back in the original machine, and it booted ok. The problem
with X freezing seems to have gone away, so I will use it in this machine
as
originally intended. However, I would still like to complete the exercise
of
getting it to boot in the other machine. (Aarhg, I spoke to soon! I just
tried it again and it has frozen. However, that is a topic for another
thread ...)
I ran 'yum update', which updated 53 packages. As mentioned I had
previously
run 'yum update kernel'. The kernel now seems to be 2.6.27.7-134.fc10.i686.
However, uname -r still shows 2.6.27.5-117.fc10.i586. What is the official
way of finding out which kernel is running?
I ran mkinitrd on the original machine, just to see if it would work. If I
type 'mkinitrd -v /boot/test.img 2.6.27.7-134.fc10' (without the .i686), I
get the message 'No modules available ...' If I include the '.i686', it
works, and creates /boot/test.img.
I don't know how to tell it to use the new image. Is there a way to change
boot options without booting off the intstallation dvd and selecting
'rescue
mode'? I did boot in rescue mode, and tried 'initrd=test.img' and
'initrd=/boot/test.img', but in both cases it said it could not find
test.img.
You mentioned modifying grub.conf, but I do not have a grub directory in
/boot at all. There is an an entry in /etc for grub.conf, but it is a link
to /boot/grub/grub.conf, so it cannot find it.
I then moved the HDD back to the second machine and booted in rescue mode.
This time 'ls /boot' did show the contents correctly - the previous problem
where it did not seem to be mounted has gone away. I ran mkinitrd and it
worked, but I still don't know how to tell it to use the new image. I tried
saving '/boot/initrd-2.6.27.7-134.fc10.i686.img', and then copying
'test.img' over it, but when I tried booting normally I got the original
error message -
Volume group VolGroup00 not found
Unable to access resume device (/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol01)
mount: error mounting /dev/root on /sysroot as ext3: No such file or
directory
I suspect that I am closer, and my problem now is that I don't know how to
tell it to use the new image. Hopefully someone can give me a nudge in the
right direction.
What does
rpm -qa --queryformat %{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}.{ARCH}\n|grep
kernel|sort
return?
Also, what do you have in /etc/grub.conf?
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: FC10 does not boot when HDD moved to another machine
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 8:36 AM, Frank Millman fr...@chagford.com wrote:
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Frank Millman wrote:
Still no luck, I am afraid. This is what I have done.
#chroot /mnt/sysimage.
'uname -r' shows 2.6.27.5-117.fc10.i586
I ran 'mkinitrd -v /boot/test.img 2.6.27.5-117.fc10.i586'.
I put the
-v in to see what was happening, but it just returns to the
prompt silently.
I think that should be:
mkinitrd -v /boot/test.img 2.6.27.5-117.fc10
(no .586)
#ls /boot shows nothing - I don't think it is mounted.
easy fix - mount /boot after running chroot.
I am surprised that you did not get an error when it could
not find the kernel.
No modules available for kernel 2.6.27.5-117.fc10.i586
Thanks for your patience, Mikkel. I think I am getting closer.
I tried the suggestion of running 'yum update kernel' while in rescue mode
on the second machine. It seemed to work, but it still would not boot.
I put the drive back in the original machine, and it booted ok. The
problem
with X freezing seems to have gone away, so I will use it in this machine
as
originally intended. However, I would still like to complete the exercise
of
getting it to boot in the other machine. (Aarhg, I spoke to soon! I just
tried it again and it has frozen. However, that is a topic for another
thread ...)
I ran 'yum update', which updated 53 packages. As mentioned I had
previously
run 'yum update kernel'. The kernel now seems to be
2.6.27.7-134.fc10.i686.
However, uname -r still shows 2.6.27.5-117.fc10.i586. What is the official
way of finding out which kernel is running?
I ran mkinitrd on the original machine, just to see if it would work. If I
type 'mkinitrd -v /boot/test.img 2.6.27.7-134.fc10' (without the .i686), I
get the message 'No modules available ...' If I include the '.i686', it
works, and creates /boot/test.img.
I don't know how to tell it to use the new image. Is there a way to change
boot options without booting off the intstallation dvd and selecting
'rescue
mode'? I did boot in rescue mode, and tried 'initrd=test.img' and
'initrd=/boot/test.img', but in both cases it said it could not find
test.img.
You mentioned modifying grub.conf, but I do not have a grub directory in
/boot at all. There is an an entry in /etc for grub.conf, but it is a link
to /boot/grub/grub.conf, so it cannot find it.
I then moved the HDD back to the second machine and booted in rescue mode.
This time 'ls /boot' did show the contents correctly - the previous
problem
where it did not seem to be mounted has gone away. I ran mkinitrd and it
worked, but I still don't know how to tell it to use the new image. I
tried
saving '/boot/initrd-2.6.27.7-134.fc10.i686.img', and then copying
'test.img' over it, but when I tried booting normally I got the original
error message -
Volume group VolGroup00 not found
Unable to access resume device (/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol01)
mount: error mounting /dev/root on /sysroot as ext3: No such file or
directory
I suspect that I am closer, and my problem now is that I don't know how to
tell it to use the new image. Hopefully someone can give me a nudge in the
right direction.
What does
rpm -qa --queryformat %{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}.{ARCH}\n|grep
kernel|sort
return?
Also, what do you have in /etc/grub.conf?
Sorry. It is
rpm -qa --queryformat %{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}.%{ARCH}\n | grep
kernel | sort
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
X session frozes
Hello, After I installed Fedora10 from scratch, I start in text mode, log and startx. Then I got the Fedora background image and the arrow pointer but not the time shape around, and it stay frozed here. I have to reboot with an hardware switch. It is a Radeon RV100 QY (Radeon 7000/VE) with a monitor 1600 x 1200. However, I do not see a xorg.conf file in /etc/X11 ! How can I configure the X session ? Thank -- --- == Patrick DUPRÉ | | Department of Chemistry| |Phone: (44)-(0)-1904-434384 The University of York | |Fax: (44)-(0)-1904-432516 Heslington | | York YO10 5DD United Kingdom | |email: pd...@york.ac.uk ==-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: libgtkhtml3 bug??
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 05:18:43AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: fred smith wrote: I'm trying to compile gnomesword. You _do_ realize that gnomesword is already packaged in Fedora? Kevin Kofler Um,... No, I wasn't :( I thought I'd searched for it in add/remove software and hadn't found it. But now I see it there. Thanks! -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - The eyes of the Lord are everywhere, keeping watch on the wicked and the good. - Proverbs 15:3 (niv) - pgpMuCAq2uNI6.pgp Description: PGP signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
A few more Network Manager issues
First, on my home system, when NM comes up it starts up in Auto Eth0 although I have defined Manual Eth0. I am not able to remove the Auto eth0 becuase it is read-only, even as root. I've read some of the other posts here and on the Fedora Forum where some said to make some changes to /etc/sysconfig/networking/devices/ifcfg-eth0 DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=none HWADDR=00:e0:81:b1:5b:00 ONBOOT=yes DNS1=192.168.0.1 DNS2=68.87.71.226 DNS2=68.87.73.242 SEARCH=blu.org NM_CONTROLLED=yes #I've changed this to yes and no TYPE=Ethernet USERCTL=no #I've changed this to yes and no IPV6INIT=no IPADDR=192.168.0.25 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 GATEWAY=192.168.0.1 PEERDNS=yes I certainly can go back to the old manual way, but AFAIK, it may be deprecated in the future. The other very minor issue is that ntpdate fails, but I am assuming that this might be timing related to NM obtaining an address from the router. -- Jerry Feldman g...@blu.org Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id: 537C5846 PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: How do you start the desktops that come with Fedora 10
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 05:11:20AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Dave Feustel wrote: yum groupinstall LXDE fails (not found). Are you on F10? LXDE is new in F10. Kevin Kofler I'm running F9. I tried to build LXDE myself but have not yet succeeded. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Auto-run a DVD
On Sat, 2008-12-20 at 16:15 -0600, Frank Cox wrote: On a F10 laptop, when I insert a commercial movie dvd I get a window that tells me you have just inserted a video dvd and gives me an opportunity to select a default application to open it with. However, the bar to make the selection in says no applications found. A bit of google-searching tells me that the System-Preferences-Hardware Removable Drives and Media should have a Multimedia tab where I can set this, but it doesn't. The only tabs that I have are Cameras-PDAs-Printers Scanners-Input Devices So how can I tell this thing to automatically crank up gnome-mplayer when I insert a video dvd? Try: System-Preferences-Personal-File Management -- === *** System shutdown message from root *** System going down in 60 seconds === Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Thunderbird 3 Beta 1 RPM - Did anyone make it?
Hi, I would like to try out the latest Thunberbird beta but i can't find a rpm for it anywhere. Is a RPM of that latest beta even build by anyone? If it is.. please send me a link. Thanx, Mark -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Auto-run a DVD
Am Sonntag, den 21.12.2008, 08:05 -0600 schrieb Aaron Konstam: So how can I tell this thing to automatically crank up gnome-mplayer when I insert a video dvd? Try: System-Preferences-Personal-File Management I tried, but (the installed) xine ist not on the list to select from (not even on the list other applications), just brasero, the burning application. How can I get xine on the list? Thanks Peter -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Lets test the h...@!! out of KDE4.2 before it releases...
Is dual-head support any better than 4.1? Until I can set different wallpapers on different screens and different virtual desktops, I'll consider KDE 4 to be a horrible regression from 3.5. (This is, after all, the main reason I've been using KDE instead of GNOME all these years.) -- Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: X session frozes
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Patrick Dupre pd...@york.ac.uk wrote: Hello, After I installed Fedora10 from scratch, I start in text mode, log and startx. Then I got the Fedora background image and the arrow pointer but not the time shape around, and it stay frozed here. I have to reboot with an hardware switch. It is a Radeon RV100 QY (Radeon 7000/VE) with a monitor 1600 x 1200. However, I do not see a xorg.conf file in /etc/X11 ! How can I configure the X session ? Run 'X -configure' This will create xorg.conf. Thanks, Anoop Thank -- --- == Patrick DUPRÉ | | Department of Chemistry| |Phone: (44)-(0)-1904-434384 The University of York | |Fax: (44)-(0)-1904-432516 Heslington | | York YO10 5DD United Kingdom | |email: pd...@york.ac.uk == -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Simple question regarding touch and mv
Don't some programs interpret -- as stdin? No. But some programs do interpret -- as no more options after this. so: touch -- -foo will work as the -- tells touch that there are no options after this. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Lets test the h...@!! out of KDE4.2 before it releases...
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 4:52 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Mark wrote: Also something important. I also installed (and removed) compiz fusion. KDE seems to go way more smoother with compiz fusion then with anything else so perhaps good to try that out. I had to install and use the emerald decoration manager to get it all working. Is the kde4-window-decorator in compiz-kde not working? Kevin Kofler It was working before i had installed compiz fusion. after that it would only work if i turned on the fusion-icon and selected kwin as decoration manager. it would like to crash a few times but worked most of the time. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: X session frozes
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008, Anoop wrote: On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Patrick Dupre pd...@york.ac.uk wrote: Hello, After I installed Fedora10 from scratch, I start in text mode, log and startx. Then I got the Fedora background image and the arrow pointer but not the time shape around, and it stay frozed here. I have to reboot with an hardware switch. It is a Radeon RV100 QY (Radeon 7000/VE) with a monitor 1600 x 1200. However, I do not see a xorg.conf file in /etc/X11 ! How can I configure the X session ? Run 'X -configure' This will create xorg.conf. It does not help. In fact I was expecting to find a /etc/X11/xorg.conf -- --- == Patrick DUPRÃ | | Department of Chemistry| |Phone: (44)-(0)-1904-434384 The University of York | |Fax: (44)-(0)-1904-432516 Heslington | | York YO10 5DD United Kingdom | |email: pd...@york.ac.uk ==-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: X session frozes
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Patrick Dupre pd...@york.ac.uk wrote: On Sun, 21 Dec 2008, Anoop wrote: On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Patrick Dupre pd...@york.ac.uk wrote: Hello, After I installed Fedora10 from scratch, I start in text mode, log and startx. Then I got the Fedora background image and the arrow pointer but not the time shape around, and it stay frozed here. I have to reboot with an hardware switch. It is a Radeon RV100 QY (Radeon 7000/VE) with a monitor 1600 x 1200. However, I do not see a xorg.conf file in /etc/X11 ! How can I configure the X session ? Run 'X -configure' This will create xorg.conf. It does not help. In fact I was expecting to find a /etc/X11/xorg.conf You mean 'X -configure' is not creating xorg.conf file ? -- --- == Patrick DUPRÉ | | Department of Chemistry| |Phone: (44)-(0)-1904-434384 The University of York | |Fax: (44)-(0)-1904-432516 Heslington | | York YO10 5DD United Kingdom | |email: pd...@york.ac.uk == -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Simple question regarding touch and mv
Roger Heflin wrote: Don't some programs interpret -- as stdin? No. But some programs do interpret -- as no more options after this. so: touch -- -foo will work as the -- tells touch that there are no options after this. I think it works for almost all command line programs - probably all the ones written in C. I believe it is build into the library function that separates out options. ./-foo also works because you are giving the path, so the - is not seen as an options. (./ = in current directory.) Mikkel -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: X session frozes
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008, Anoop wrote: On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Patrick Dupre pd...@york.ac.uk wrote: On Sun, 21 Dec 2008, Anoop wrote: On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Patrick Dupre pd...@york.ac.uk wrote: Hello, After I installed Fedora10 from scratch, I start in text mode, log and startx. Then I got the Fedora background image and the arrow pointer but not the time shape around, and it stay frozed here. I have to reboot with an hardware switch. It is a Radeon RV100 QY (Radeon 7000/VE) with a monitor 1600 x 1200. However, I do not see a xorg.conf file in /etc/X11 ! How can I configure the X session ? Run 'X -configure' This will create xorg.conf. It does not help. In fact I was expecting to find a /etc/X11/xorg.conf You mean 'X -configure' is not creating xorg.conf file ? No, it does create $(HOME)/.xorg.conf -- --- == Patrick DUPRÉ | | Department of Chemistry| |Phone: (44)-(0)-1904-434384 The University of York | |Fax: (44)-(0)-1904-432516 Heslington | | York YO10 5DD United Kingdom | |email: pd...@york.ac.uk == -- --- == Patrick DUPRÉ | | Department of Chemistry| |Phone: (44)-(0)-1904-434384 The University of York | |Fax: (44)-(0)-1904-432516 Heslington | | York YO10 5DD United Kingdom | |email: pd...@york.ac.uk ==-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: FC10 does not boot when HDD moved to another machine
Frank Millman wrote: I tried the suggestion of running 'yum update kernel' while in rescue mode on the second machine. It seemed to work, but it still would not boot. This will only work if you booted in the rescue mode on the new machine, and ran chroot /mnt/sysimage. (Mount /boot after that if it didn't get mounted.) I ran 'yum update', which updated 53 packages. As mentioned I had previously run 'yum update kernel'. The kernel now seems to be 2.6.27.7-134.fc10.i686. However, uname -r still shows 2.6.27.5-117.fc10.i586. What is the official way of finding out which kernel is running? Did you reboot after installing the new kernel? The new kernel should be used when you reboot. If it is not show as the default kernel when booting, hit the down arrow while Grub is counting down, and select the kernel from the menu. I ran mkinitrd on the original machine, just to see if it would work. If I type 'mkinitrd -v /boot/test.img 2.6.27.7-134.fc10' (without the .i686), I get the message 'No modules available ...' If I include the '.i686', it works, and creates /boot/test.img. OK - I guessed they changed things in F10. I don't know how to tell it to use the new image. Is there a way to change boot options without booting off the intstallation dvd and selecting 'rescue mode'? I did boot in rescue mode, and tried 'initrd=test.img' and 'initrd=/boot/test.img', but in both cases it said it could not find test.img. You can edit the kernel line in Grub before it boots the kernel. If we have to go that route, we can cover it. (My brain is froze - I was out shoveling/snow blowing snow...) You mentioned modifying grub.conf, but I do not have a grub directory in /boot at all. There is an an entry in /etc for grub.conf, but it is a link to /boot/grub/grub.conf, so it cannot find it. It sounds like you are not getting all partitions mounted when booting in the rescue mode. After doing the chroot /mnt/sysimage, run mount /boot and it should show up. I then moved the HDD back to the second machine and booted in rescue mode. This time 'ls /boot' did show the contents correctly - the previous problem where it did not seem to be mounted has gone away. I ran mkinitrd and it worked, but I still don't know how to tell it to use the new image. I tried saving '/boot/initrd-2.6.27.7-134.fc10.i686.img', and then copying 'test.img' over it, but when I tried booting normally I got the original error message - You HAVE TO build the new initrd image on the new machine. If you build it on the old machine, it will have the drivers for the old machine. This not what you want. (The image is the same as the one you are trying to boot off of now, and is not working.) Mikkel -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: X session frozes
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Patrick Dupre pd...@york.ac.uk wrote: On Sun, 21 Dec 2008, Anoop wrote: On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Patrick Dupre pd...@york.ac.uk wrote: On Sun, 21 Dec 2008, Anoop wrote: It does not help. In fact I was expecting to find a /etc/X11/xorg.conf You mean 'X -configure' is not creating xorg.conf file ? No, it does create $(HOME)/.xorg.conf OK. Try testing it. run 'X -config $(HOME)/xorg.conf. See if it works. You can also try coping it to /etc/X11 and rebooting once. Thanks, Anoop -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Comcast permanent block on port 25
NiftyFedora Mitch wrote: Port 25 in and out may be negotiated in some areas... The default in my area was to block it but a polite call to SBC unblocked it for me. I still had issues at the other end as my reverse DNS was known home DHCP class sites and I had to use them as a 'smart' host. HTTP is more interesting... as it can be a business but without a fixed IP address dynamic DNS is seen as wonky ... However a personal site with limited traffic can also serve students homework. But it need not be on port 80. Look into various hosting or co-location solutions some are much less expensive than good bandwidth to the home. Comcast bundles several accounts with email and space on their servers for storage and http service along with the connection. There's not a lot of reason to run your own server unless you have dynamic content. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
RE: Plymouth Config
Not to sound rude, but could you copy/paste the exact grub line? If it turns out to be correct, you should probably file a bug. Priceless, Wasn't at all rude, but needed! I had been editing it so many times I never noticed an extraneous character:) My bad! Now that 1600x1000 works, it looks good but it doesn't seem to be able to do the resolution of my lcd, 1680x1050. I am guessing that will change soon. Thanks, jlc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Thunderbird 3 Beta 1 RPM - Did anyone make it?
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Mark mark...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I would like to try out the latest Thunberbird beta but i can't find a rpm for it anywhere. Is a RPM of that latest beta even build by anyone? AFAIK there is no RPM yet (and I wouldn't expect there to be until the thing is actually released). Just download the tarball and unpack it. You can use it directly without installation. Note that it will change some profile settings in ~/.thunderbird so make a backup if you want to be careful. poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Comcast permanent block on port 25
On Sun, 2008-12-21 at 09:50 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: Comcast bundles several accounts with email and space on their servers for storage and http service along with the connection. There's not a lot of reason to run your own server unless you have dynamic content. Or space? I don't know about Comcast, but it's typical for ISPs to only give users a few megabytes, here (e.g. 10 is common). My first external host only gave out 10 megs on their basic package, which seems enough, at first. But apart from it being an obvious limit on the content that you could serve (e.g. anything more than plain pages), it was 10 megs for your HTTP content, HTTP logs, mail spools, webserver temporary files, all combined. Even a small site could clog up, quite quickly, if it attracted enough traffic. Especially since the only automation offered was to delete last month's logs. Not email you them, but delete them. Likewise, their implementations of spam handling were just as inept. I've grown to despise CPanel based systems. They seem to be used as turnkey systems for incompetent webhosts. -- [...@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.7-53.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: fuse changed my mount points?
On Sun, 2008-12-21 at 10:39 -0500, Steve wrote: The Dec 07 entries are mostly screensaver stuff. You might want to post that list, in case someone can spot the culprit. I'd be highly surprised at CUPS having anything to do with it. -- [...@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.7-53.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: X session frozes
On Sun, 2008-12-21 at 21:13 +0530, Anoop wrote: You can also try coping it to /etc/X11 and rebooting once. Simply restarting X would be less drastic, and less time consuming. Especially if you need to test out various different modifications. This isn't Windows. If the system is still freezing, after that, of course you'd need to reboot. But there's no need to go through a full reboot before that happens, if it does. -- [...@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.7-53.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Fedora 10 Stables feed broken?
Andre Costa wrote: anyone managed to subscribe to Fedora 10 Stables feed? I always get: 500 Internal error The server encountered an unexpected condition which prevented it from fulfilling the request. Other feeds (Pending, Testing and Security) are all fine. I think this is https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/267 -- ToddOpenPGP - KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~ To know what is right and not to do it is the worst cowardice. -- Confucius pgpHXjAc5QYpB.pgp Description: PGP signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
