[Fwd: bugzilla.redhat.com, hardware.redhat.com Planned Outage | Jan 09 2009 - 9:00 PM EST]

2009-01-07 Thread John Poelstra



 Original Message 
Subject: bugzilla.redhat.com,	hardware.redhat.com Planned Outage | Jan 
09 2009 - 9:00 PM EST

Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 11:18:46 -0500
From: Meethune Bhowmick


O U T A G E   R E Q U E S T   F O R M
=

Severity:
Severity Four (Low)/CSR

Scheduled Date:
Jan 09 2009

Scheduled Time:
9:00 PM EST

Estimated Time Required:
1 hour

Performed By:
Engineering Operations

People/Groups Impacted:
Bugzilla Users

Site/Services Affected:
bugzilla.redhat.com, hardware.redhat.com

Impact:
Bugzilla will be temporarily offline while we run updates.

Description:
Running package updates. Hosts will be rebooted.

Signoff:
msch...@redhat.com

--
fedora-announce-list mailing list
fedora-announce-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-announce-list


Fedora Unity F9 20081217 respins

2009-01-07 Thread ben
The Fedora Unity Project is proud to announce the release of new ISO 
Re-Spins of Fedora 9.


These Re-Spin ISOs are based on the officially released Fedora 9 
installation media and include all updates released as of December 17th, 
2008.


The ISO images are available for i386, x86_64 architectures via Jigdo 
and Torrent starting Wednesday January 7th, 2008.


Go to http://spins.fedoraunity.org/spins to get the bits!


 DVD Media Only

Due to known problems in comps,  this is a DVD Only Re-spin. The CD 
version would have required all 6 to 7 discs to install.



 Full Installation Problems if Language Support Groups Selected

Selecting some language groups will cause file conflict errors, such as 
reported and explained in #465715 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465715



 Thanks to

We would like to give a special thanks to the following for testing this 
Re-Spin:


- zcatJason Farrell
- vwbusguy-   Scott Williams
- Southern_Gentleman  Ben Williams
- kanarip Jeroen van Meeuwen
- _drj2   Dennis Johnson


 Testing Results

A full test matrix can be found at our Test Matrix 
http://spins.fedoraunity.org/Members/Southern_Gentleman/f9-20081217-testmatrix


A full list of bugs, packages and changelogs that have been updated in 
this Re-Spin can be reviewed on 
http://spins.fedoraunity.org/changelogs/20081217// 
http://spins.fedoraunity.org/changelogs/20081217/



 Previous Re-Spin (20081004) will expire

Due to limited resources, this spin will immediately obsolete 20080718, 
which will be deleted from our mirrors in the next few days.


Fedora Unity has taken up the Re-Spin task to provide the community with 
the chance to install Fedora with recent updates already included.


These updates might otherwise comprise more than 2.05GiB of downloads 
for a full install.


This is a community project, for and by the community. You can 
contribute to the community by joining our test process.


Go to http://spins.fedoraunity.org/spins to get the bits!


 Assistance Needed

If you are interested in helping with the testing or mirroring efforts, 
please contact the Fedora Unity team.


Contact information is available at http://fedoraunity.org/ or the 
#fedora-unity channel on the Freenode IRC Network (irc.freenode.net).


To report bugs in the Re-Spins please use http://bugs.fedoraunity.org/

--
Ben Williams
Window-Linux Specialist
Mathematics Department-Virginia Tech
561E McBryde Hall
540 231-2739

--
fedora-announce-list mailing list
fedora-announce-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-announce-list


Unsigned nautilus packages in latest F10 updates

2009-01-07 Thread Jesse Keating
Due to an as of yet not fully understood bug, unsigned nautilus packages
slipped into the last Fedora 10 updates push.  I have a new updates push
running with signed versions of those packages which should finish in
the next 20 minutes or so.  We apologize for any inconvenience this may
have caused and will continue to investigate the root cause.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
fedora-announce-list mailing list
fedora-announce-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-announce-list

Re: Fedora-Logo in 3D

2009-01-07 Thread Mola pahnadayan
Hi Gerold
https://kermit.homelinux.net/backgrounds/
this link is my work too ;)

Temp work of fedora : http://molaora.com/index.php/photos/album/8.html
Fedora gallery: http://molaora.com/index.php/photos/album/4.html
In deviantart : http://mola-mp.deviantart.com/gallery/#Fedora

I have submit source of blender file in this link :
http://molaora.com/index.php/blog/show/Blender-source-of-Fedora-logo-.html



On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 14:10 +0100, Gerold Kassube wrote:
 I'm looking for a artwork like this in 
 
 https://kermit.homelinux.net/backgrounds/
 
 for having a good master for creating a model 
 But my friend needs it plane and not with angles 
 
 Thanks for all of your help
 
 Gerold
 
 
 
 Am Montag, den 05.01.2009, 14:40 +0200 schrieb Nicu Buculei:
  Gerold Kassube wrote:
   Hi all,
   
   Second, I'm searching for the Fedora Logo in 3D, does anybody has such a
   artwork?
   I thought I saw such a work many month (years?) before done by someone
   of the Art Team.
  
  Something like this? http://www.isity.net/icFedora/060419/TakeTwoA1.jpg
  
   Background is, that I found a stone cutter who will make a model for
   me/us, and we want to do a bronze model for fairs.
  
 ___
 Fedora-art-list mailing list
 Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
 http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list

___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


RE: * Proposed Guideline Changes - Bitmap Post-processing in Echo Icons

2009-01-07 Thread victor trachiner



 From: fedora-art-list-requ...@redhat.com
 Subject: Fedora-art-list Digest, Vol 34, Issue 6
 To: fedora-art-list@redhat.com
 Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 12:00:06 -0500
 
 Send Fedora-art-list mailing list submissions to
   fedora-art-list@redhat.com
 
 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
   http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
   fedora-art-list-requ...@redhat.com
 
 You can reach the person managing the list at
   fedora-art-list-ow...@redhat.com
 
 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
 than Re: Contents of Fedora-art-list digest...
 
 
 Today's Topics:
 
1. Echo Monthly News Issue 4-5, November - December 2008
   (Martin Sourada)
2. Re: Echo Monthly News Issue 4-5, November - December 2008
   (Martin Sourada)
 
 
 --
 
 Message: 1
 Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:15:08 +0100
 From: Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com
 Subject: Echo Monthly News Issue 4-5, November - December 2008
 To: Discussions about the artwork included with Fedora, including
   icons,  themes, and wallpapers. fedora-art-list@redhat.com,
   fedora-announce-l...@redhat.com fedora-announce-l...@redhat.com
 Message-ID: 1231280108.19371.11.ca...@pc-notebook
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 
 Hi,
 
 We've just published latest Echo Monthly News Issue [1]. Due too lack of
 enough content, it is joint of November's and December's happenings. The
 topics are:
 
 * Echo Perspective
  - Proposed Designs
 
 * Proposed Guideline Changes
  - Bitmap Post-processing in Echo Icons
 
 Regards,
 The Echo Team
 -- next part --
 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
 Name: not available
 Type: application/pgp-signature
 Size: 197 bytes
 Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
 Url : 
 https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-art-list/attachments/20090106/7108b2d6/attachment.bin
 
 --
 
 Message: 2
 Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:48:16 +0100
 From: Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: Echo Monthly News Issue 4-5, November - December 2008
 To: Discussions about the artwork included with Fedora, including
   icons,  themes, and wallpapers. fedora-art-list@redhat.com
 Cc: fedora-announce-l...@redhat.com
   fedora-announce-l...@redhat.com
 Message-ID: 1231282096.19371.13.ca...@pc-notebook
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 
 On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 23:15 +0100, Martin Sourada wrote:
  Hi,
  
  We've just published latest Echo Monthly News Issue [1]. Due too lack of
  enough content, it is joint of November's and December's happenings. The
  topics are:
  
  * Echo Perspective
   - Proposed Designs
  
  * Proposed Guideline Changes
   - Bitmap Post-processing in Echo Icons
  
  Regards,
  The Echo Team
 
 Sorry for the second mail, I forgot to actually add the reference.
 
 [1] https://fedorahosted.org/echo-icon-theme/wiki/MonthlyNews/Issue4-5
 
 -- next part --
 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
 Name: not available
 Type: application/pgp-signature
 Size: 197 bytes
 Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
 Url : 
 https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-art-list/attachments/20090106/fa359761/attachment.bin
 
 --
 
 ___
 Fedora-art-list mailing list
 Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
 http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
 
 
 End of Fedora-art-list Digest, Vol 34, Issue 6
 **

_
Llévate Messenger en el móvil a todas partes ¡Conéctate!
http://www.microsoft.com/spain/windowsmobile/messenger/default.mspx   ___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: Echo Monthly News Issue 4-5, November - December 2008

2009-01-07 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
Quoting Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com:

 Sorry for the second mail, I forgot to actually add the reference.

 [1] https://fedorahosted.org/echo-icon-theme/wiki/MonthlyNews/Issue4-5




News submitted on Fedora Forum [1]

Luya

[1]http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=210042

___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


I need a freemedia web banner.

2009-01-07 Thread susmit shannigrahi
Like this:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Image:Artwork_ArtTeamProjects_WikiDesign_ArtTeamN1.png

for the top banner of
https://fedorahosted.org/freemedia/

Is there any existing design?


-- 
Regards,
Susmit.

=
ssh
0x86DD170A
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/user:susmit
=

___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: Koji feature proposals

2009-01-07 Thread Oliver Falk

Mike Bonnet wrote:

On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 21:51 +0100, Oliver Falk wrote:

Hi Mike!

Mike Bonnet schrieb:

I've just created tickets for a few Koji features that I've been wanting
to implement for a while (as well as updated an old one), and I'm
planning to devote some time to in the near future.  If you have any
comments on these features feel free to post to the tickets, or talk to
me at FUDCon this weekend.  Just figured people might want to see the
direction that Koji is headed.  The future is now! :)

[ ... ]


drop the rpmfiles and rpmdeps tables: https://fedorahosted.org/koji/ticket/124

-1
Only if you provide the same functionality using another approach :-)


Yes, the plan is to query the information directly from the rpms rather
than from the database.


You'll likely need to cache the list of files somewhere. Just to mention 
it: Using yum metadata isn't enough, as you'll only query the latest pkgs...


 The content on the rpminfo page in the web UI

should not change at all from the user perspective.


Good.


*I* do use it quite often; Find out which file belongs to which pkg(s).

However, this was quite slow and now doesn't even seem to work in 
koji.fpo. :-(


Hmmm, it should be.  In what way is it not working?


Query for Files (eg. /bin/ls):

Mod_python error: PythonHandler mod_python.publisher

Traceback (most recent call last):

  File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/mod_python/apache.py, line 
299, in HandlerDispatch

result = object(req)

  File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/mod_python/publisher.py, line 
213, in handler

published = publish_object(req, object)

  File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/mod_python/publisher.py, line 
412, in publish_object
return publish_object(req,util.apply_fs_data(object, req.form, 
req=req))


  File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/mod_python/util.py, line 439, 
in apply_fs_data

return object(**args)

  File /usr/share/koji-web/scripts/index.py, line 1680, in search
start=start, dataName='results', prefix='result', order=order)

  File /usr/share/koji-web/lib/kojiweb/util.py, line 123, in 
paginateMethod

totalRows = getattr(server, methodName)(*args, **kw)

  File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/koji/__init__.py, line 1133, 
in __call__

return self.__func(self.__name,args,opts)

  File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/koji/__init__.py, line 1378, 
in _callMethod

raise err

Fault:


noarch subpackage support: https://fedorahosted.org/koji/ticket/125
Duh? We do have already (at least one) packages that build arch-specific 
and noarch pkgs - kernel or do we use some *hack* in the kernel.spec?


We use a hack in the kernel specfile and in the build system.  The
noarch subpackage support in rpm is much more generic and flexible, and
we need to support it without build system hacks.


OK. I wasn't quite sure how it's working now... However, now that I know 
I do understand.


And regarding your point: '... different arches build noarch subpackage 
with different contents'. Well, then it's definitly not *noarch*, is't 
it? :-)


True, but it's still possible, and we may need to check for this case
and handle is appropriately (possibly by failing the build).


Yet another post install section processing script (YAPISPS) :-)

And yes, if it's not really noarch, it should fail. But shouldn't rpm 
itself check that? I mean, if someone writes a script to check that it 
should possibly go directly into rpm upstream sources...


-of

--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list


Re: Koji feature proposals

2009-01-07 Thread Oliver Falk

Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:

OF == Oliver Falk oli...@linux-kernel.at writes:


OF And regarding your point: '... different arches build noarch
OF subpackage with different contents'. Well, then it's definitly not
OF *noarch*, is't it? :-)

It is quite possible for the contents to differ by, say, date, or by
timestamps being included in plain text output.  Why would that render
the output arch-specific?


We where talking about *real* content... :-)

What I could imaging to happen is something like this (just an example, 
but it should make my point clear):


i386:
 somescript.sh
 #!/usr/libexec/blabla/i386-bla-bla/bla/binary
 ...

x86_64:
 somescript.sh
 #!/usr/libexec/blabla/x86_64-bla-bla/bla/binary
 ...

alpha:
 somescript.sh
 #!/usr/libexec/blabla/alpha-bla-bla/bla/binary
 ...

It's hard to check something like this, isn't it? Well, as long as it's 
only the interpreter line at the beginning it might be simple, but 


But don't worry, since we do have a few arches already, such bugs should 
be found quite fast and maybe we can add additional checks later :-)


-of

--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list


Re: Koji feature proposals

2009-01-07 Thread Jesse Keating
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 09:08 +0100, Oliver Falk wrote:
 Yet another post install section processing script (YAPISPS) :-)
 
 And yes, if it's not really noarch, it should fail. But shouldn't rpm 
 itself check that? I mean, if someone writes a script to check that it 
 should possibly go directly into rpm upstream sources...

rpm itself only ever builds for one target at a time, so a script to
check to see if what was produced from one target build is different
from another target build doesn't necessarily make sense in rpm sources,
at least not something ran automated.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list

Re: Koji feature proposals

2009-01-07 Thread Oliver Falk

Jesse Keating wrote:

On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 09:08 +0100, Oliver Falk wrote:

Yet another post install section processing script (YAPISPS) :-)

And yes, if it's not really noarch, it should fail. But shouldn't rpm 
itself check that? I mean, if someone writes a script to check that it 
should possibly go directly into rpm upstream sources...


rpm itself only ever builds for one target at a time, so a script to
check to see if what was produced from one target build is different
from another target build doesn't necessarily make sense in rpm sources,
at least not something ran automated.


OKOK. I thought rpmbuild will automagically produce arch-specific and 
noarch packages in 'one step'...


-of

--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list


Re: Koji feature proposals

2009-01-07 Thread Jesse Keating
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 17:23 +0100, Oliver Falk wrote:
 
 OKOK. I thought rpmbuild will automagically produce arch-specific and 
 noarch packages in 'one step'...

It will, for one arch.  You do a rpmbuild --rebuild foo (on x86_64) and
it'll spit out x86_64 binary packages and potentially a noarch package.
What we care about is doing the same command on i386 and generating i386
packages and a noarch package, having the i386 produced noarch package
match the x86_64 produced noarch package.  To the best of my knowledge
there is no way to convince rpmbuild to produce both i386 /and/ x86_64
packages in the same run.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list

[PATCH/mock] Fix git log command used for ChangeLog and AUTHORS

2009-01-07 Thread Todd Zullinger
The git-* commands are not in the PATH by default with git = 1.6.0.

Signed-off-by: Todd Zullinger t...@pobox.com
---
 Makefile.am |4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index aefcad8..4fe1e7d 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@ -58,10 +58,10 @@ CLEANFILES += py/*.pyc py/mock/*.pyc py/mock/plugins/*.pyc
 
 dist: ChangeLog AUTHORS
 ChangeLog:
-   (GIT_DIR=.git git-log  .changelog.tmp  mv .changelog.tmp ChangeLog; 
rm -f .changelog.tmp) || (touch ChangeLog; echo 'git directory not found: 
installing possibly empty changelog.' 2)
+   (GIT_DIR=.git git log  .changelog.tmp  mv .changelog.tmp ChangeLog; 
rm -f .changelog.tmp) || (touch ChangeLog; echo 'git directory not found: 
installing possibly empty changelog.' 2)
 
 AUTHORS:
-   (GIT_DIR=.git git-log | grep ^Author | sort |uniq  .authors.tmp  mv 
.authors.tmp AUTHORS; rm -f .authors.tmp) || (touch AUTHORS; echo 'git 
directory not found: installing possibly empty AUTHORS.' 2)
+   (GIT_DIR=.git git log | grep ^Author | sort |uniq  .authors.tmp  mv 
.authors.tmp AUTHORS; rm -f .authors.tmp) || (touch AUTHORS; echo 'git 
directory not found: installing possibly empty AUTHORS.' 2)
 
 REPLACE_VARS_ON_INSTALL=$(sbindir)/mock.py
 install-exec-hook:
-- 
1.6.1

-- 
ToddOpenPGP - KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~
Intaxication (n.) Euphoria at getting a tax refund, which lasts until
you realize it was your money to start with.

--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list


Re: Koji feature proposals

2009-01-07 Thread Oliver Falk

Jesse Keating wrote:

On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 17:23 +0100, Oliver Falk wrote:
OKOK. I thought rpmbuild will automagically produce arch-specific and 
noarch packages in 'one step'...


It will, for one arch.  You do a rpmbuild --rebuild foo (on x86_64) and
it'll spit out x86_64 binary packages and potentially a noarch package.
What we care about is doing the same command on i386 and generating i386
packages and a noarch package, having the i386 produced noarch package
match the x86_64 produced noarch package.  To the best of my knowledge
there is no way to convince rpmbuild to produce both i386 /and/ x86_64
packages in the same run.


Alright. I got it now - I think :-)

So a build in koji will produce a noarch package for every arch. And 
then you need to decide which noarch package to take and how to find out 
if there are (arch specific) differences in those noarch's, right?


-of

--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list


[Bug 477440] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477440


Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA




--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-01-07 04:16:58 EDT ---
php-ZendFramework-1.7.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-ZendFramework'.  You can
provide feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0094

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479


Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mail...@l |
   |aposte.net) |




--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net  2009-01-07 
04:23:27 EDT ---
Those other pages that were approved yesterday by FPC (minutes not posted yet)
may also be relevant for VLGothic
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_(2008-12-21)
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2008-12-22)

You probably want to perform the naming changes at the same time.
To change a srpm naming, the current procedure is to orphan the old package in
rawhide, and post a review request with the new name (I'll approve it as a
matter of course if you do so)

This will be discussed this evening by FESCO, you may want to add some input
here
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/RenamingPackages

As for the upgrade path, you have two choices:
1. If there is a clear mapping between the old packages and the new packages,
use obsoletes inside the packages
2. If there is not use a compat package to garbage collect the old packages as
has been done for dejavu in rawhide

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 477375] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477375


Roy Rankin rran...@ihug.com.au changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 477406] kdeedu: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477406


Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||478662




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions

2009-01-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662


Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
 Blocks||477406




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/devel dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 dustin-dustismo-fonts-roman-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sour

2009-01-07 Thread Sven Lankes
Author: slankes

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv772

Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources 
Added Files:
dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf 
dustin-dustismo-fonts-roman-fontconfig.conf 
dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
initial import


--- NEW FILE dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf ---
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM ../fonts.dtd
fontconfig
  alias
familysans-serif/family
prefer
  familyDustismo/family
/prefer
  /alias
  alias
familyDustismo/family
default
  familysans-serif/family
/default
  /alias
/fontconfig



--- NEW FILE dustin-dustismo-fonts-roman-fontconfig.conf ---
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM ../fonts.dtd
fontconfig
  alias
familyserif/family
prefer
  familyDustismo/family
/prefer
  /alias
  alias
familyDustismo/family
default
  familyserif/family
/default
  /alias
/fontconfig



--- NEW FILE dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec ---
%define fontname dustin-dustismo
%define fontconf 63-%{fontname}

%define common_desc General purpose fonts by Dustin Norlander available in \
serif and sans-serif versions. The fonts cover all European Latin characters.

Name:  %{fontname}-fonts
Version:   20030318
Release:   2%{?dist}
Summary:   General purpose sans-serif font with bold, italic and 
bold-italic variations

Group: User Interface/X
License:   GPLv2+
URL:   http://www.dustismo.com
# Actual download URL
#URL:   
http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/t/ttf-dustin/ttf-dustin_20030517.orig.tar.gz
 
Source0:   Dustismo.zip
Source1:   %{name}-fontconfig.conf
Source2:   %{name}-roman-fontconfig.conf
BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XX)

BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel

%description
%common_desc

%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf}.conf dustismo_bold_italic.ttf dustismo_bold.ttf 
dustismo_italic.ttf Dustismo.ttf

%package common
Summary:   Common files for %{name}
Group: User Interface/X
Requires:  fontpackages-filesystem

%description common
%common_desc

This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages.

%package   roman
Summary:   General purpose serif font
Group: User Interface/X
Requires:  %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}

%description roman
%common_desc

General purpose serif font with bold, italic and bold-italic variations

%_font_pkg -n roman -f %{fontconf}-roman.conf Dustismo_Roman_Bold.ttf 
Dustismo_Roman.ttf Dustismo_Roman_Italic_Bold.ttf Dustismo_Roman_Italic.ttf 
 

%prep
%setup -q -c %{name}
sed -i 's/\r//' license.txt

%build

%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT

install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}

install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} 
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}

install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} 
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2} 
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-roman.conf

for fontconf in %{fontconf}.conf %{fontconf}-roman.conf ; do
  ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fontconf 
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fontconf
done

%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT

%files common
%defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
%doc license.txt

%dir %{_fontdir}

%changelog
* Wed Dec 07 2009 Sven Lankes s...@lank.es - 20030318-2
- Change package-name to dustin-dustistmo-fonts

* Sun Dec 04 2009 Sven Lankes s...@lank.es - 20030318-1
- Use newer debian-source as source
- Convert to -multi spec

* Wed Dec 31 2008 Sven Lankes s...@lank.es - 20030207-1
- Initial packaging



Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore  7 Jan 2009 00:04:31 -   1.1
+++ .cvsignore  7 Jan 2009 19:39:53 -   1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+Dustismo.zip


Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources 7 Jan 2009 00:04:31 -   1.1
+++ sources 7 Jan 2009 19:39:53 -   1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+de74f82082b7dba21e457b8bb32b88a5  Dustismo.zip

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-10 dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 dustin-dustismo-fonts-roman-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1

2009-01-07 Thread Sven Lankes
Author: slankes

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2891/F-10

Added Files:
dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf 
dustin-dustismo-fonts-roman-fontconfig.conf 
dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
initial import


--- NEW FILE dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf ---
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM ../fonts.dtd
fontconfig
  alias
familysans-serif/family
prefer
  familyDustismo/family
/prefer
  /alias
  alias
familyDustismo/family
default
  familysans-serif/family
/default
  /alias
/fontconfig



--- NEW FILE dustin-dustismo-fonts-roman-fontconfig.conf ---
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM ../fonts.dtd
fontconfig
  alias
familyserif/family
prefer
  familyDustismo/family
/prefer
  /alias
  alias
familyDustismo/family
default
  familyserif/family
/default
  /alias
/fontconfig



--- NEW FILE dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec ---
%define fontname dustin-dustismo
%define fontconf 63-%{fontname}

%define common_desc General purpose fonts by Dustin Norlander available in \
serif and sans-serif versions. The fonts cover all European Latin characters.

Name:  %{fontname}-fonts
Version:   20030318
Release:   2%{?dist}
Summary:   General purpose sans-serif font with bold, italic and 
bold-italic variations

Group: User Interface/X
License:   GPLv2+
URL:   http://www.dustismo.com
# Actual download URL
#URL:   
http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/t/ttf-dustin/ttf-dustin_20030517.orig.tar.gz
 
Source0:   Dustismo.zip
Source1:   %{name}-fontconfig.conf
Source2:   %{name}-roman-fontconfig.conf
BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XX)

BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel

%description
%common_desc

%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf}.conf dustismo_bold_italic.ttf dustismo_bold.ttf 
dustismo_italic.ttf Dustismo.ttf

%package common
Summary:   Common files for %{name}
Group: User Interface/X
Requires:  fontpackages-filesystem

%description common
%common_desc

This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages.

%package   roman
Summary:   General purpose serif font
Group: User Interface/X
Requires:  %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}

%description roman
%common_desc

General purpose serif font with bold, italic and bold-italic variations

%_font_pkg -n roman -f %{fontconf}-roman.conf Dustismo_Roman_Bold.ttf 
Dustismo_Roman.ttf Dustismo_Roman_Italic_Bold.ttf Dustismo_Roman_Italic.ttf 
 

%prep
%setup -q -c %{name}
sed -i 's/\r//' license.txt

%build

%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT

install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}

install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} 
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}

install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} 
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2} 
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-roman.conf

for fontconf in %{fontconf}.conf %{fontconf}-roman.conf ; do
  ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fontconf 
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fontconf
done

%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT

%files common
%defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
%doc license.txt

%dir %{_fontdir}

%changelog
* Wed Dec 07 2009 Sven Lankes s...@lank.es - 20030318-2
- Change package-name to dustin-dustistmo-fonts

* Sun Dec 04 2009 Sven Lankes s...@lank.es - 20030318-1
- Use newer debian-source as source
- Convert to -multi spec

* Wed Dec 31 2008 Sven Lankes s...@lank.es - 20030207-1
- Initial packaging


___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-9 dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 dustin-dustismo-fonts-roman-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1

2009-01-07 Thread Sven Lankes
Author: slankes

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-9
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2891/F-9

Added Files:
dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf 
dustin-dustismo-fonts-roman-fontconfig.conf 
dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
initial import


--- NEW FILE dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf ---
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM ../fonts.dtd
fontconfig
  alias
familysans-serif/family
prefer
  familyDustismo/family
/prefer
  /alias
  alias
familyDustismo/family
default
  familysans-serif/family
/default
  /alias
/fontconfig



--- NEW FILE dustin-dustismo-fonts-roman-fontconfig.conf ---
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM ../fonts.dtd
fontconfig
  alias
familyserif/family
prefer
  familyDustismo/family
/prefer
  /alias
  alias
familyDustismo/family
default
  familyserif/family
/default
  /alias
/fontconfig



--- NEW FILE dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec ---
%define fontname dustin-dustismo
%define fontconf 63-%{fontname}

%define common_desc General purpose fonts by Dustin Norlander available in \
serif and sans-serif versions. The fonts cover all European Latin characters.

Name:  %{fontname}-fonts
Version:   20030318
Release:   2%{?dist}
Summary:   General purpose sans-serif font with bold, italic and 
bold-italic variations

Group: User Interface/X
License:   GPLv2+
URL:   http://www.dustismo.com
# Actual download URL
#URL:   
http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/t/ttf-dustin/ttf-dustin_20030517.orig.tar.gz
 
Source0:   Dustismo.zip
Source1:   %{name}-fontconfig.conf
Source2:   %{name}-roman-fontconfig.conf
BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XX)

BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel

%description
%common_desc

%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf}.conf dustismo_bold_italic.ttf dustismo_bold.ttf 
dustismo_italic.ttf Dustismo.ttf

%package common
Summary:   Common files for %{name}
Group: User Interface/X
Requires:  fontpackages-filesystem

%description common
%common_desc

This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages.

%package   roman
Summary:   General purpose serif font
Group: User Interface/X
Requires:  %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}

%description roman
%common_desc

General purpose serif font with bold, italic and bold-italic variations

%_font_pkg -n roman -f %{fontconf}-roman.conf Dustismo_Roman_Bold.ttf 
Dustismo_Roman.ttf Dustismo_Roman_Italic_Bold.ttf Dustismo_Roman_Italic.ttf 
 

%prep
%setup -q -c %{name}
sed -i 's/\r//' license.txt

%build

%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT

install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}

install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} 
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}

install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} 
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2} 
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-roman.conf

for fontconf in %{fontconf}.conf %{fontconf}-roman.conf ; do
  ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fontconf 
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fontconf
done

%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT

%files common
%defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
%doc license.txt

%dir %{_fontdir}

%changelog
* Wed Dec 07 2009 Sven Lankes s...@lank.es - 20030318-2
- Change package-name to dustin-dustistmo-fonts

* Sun Dec 04 2009 Sven Lankes s...@lank.es - 20030318-1
- Use newer debian-source as source
- Convert to -multi spec

* Wed Dec 31 2008 Sven Lankes s...@lank.es - 20030207-1
- Initial packaging


___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-10 .cvsignore,1.1,1.2 sources,1.1,1.2

2009-01-07 Thread Sven Lankes
Author: slankes

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3724/F-10

Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources 
Log Message:
add the source file for the release branches


Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-10/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore  7 Jan 2009 00:04:31 -   1.1
+++ .cvsignore  7 Jan 2009 20:01:37 -   1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+Dustismo.zip


Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-10/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources 7 Jan 2009 00:04:31 -   1.1
+++ sources 7 Jan 2009 20:01:37 -   1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+de74f82082b7dba21e457b8bb32b88a5  Dustismo.zip

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-9 .cvsignore,1.1,1.2 sources,1.1,1.2

2009-01-07 Thread Sven Lankes
Author: slankes

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-9
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3724/F-9

Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources 
Log Message:
add the source file for the release branches


Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-9/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore  7 Jan 2009 00:04:31 -   1.1
+++ .cvsignore  7 Jan 2009 20:01:37 -   1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+Dustismo.zip


Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-9/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources 7 Jan 2009 00:04:31 -   1.1
+++ sources 7 Jan 2009 20:01:37 -   1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+de74f82082b7dba21e457b8bb32b88a5  Dustismo.zip

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions

2009-01-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662





--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-01-07 15:10:45 EDT ---
dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
9.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-2.fc9

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions

2009-01-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662





--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-01-07 15:09:54 EDT ---
dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-2.fc10

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 477427] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427





--- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net  2009-01-07 
18:09:25 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
 (In reply to comment #9)

  ./lang/sm_utf8/fonts/default.ttf
  ./lang/to_utf8/fonts/default.ttf
  Arial Narrow, not OK.  I can modify the source to strip this out, and then
  symlink to something, what would be a good replacement? 
  I'll then notify upstream.
 
 No idea, maybe ask Jens Petersen?

In fact Tongan and Samoan are already 100% covered by Dejavu (all families), so
this is not only illegal, but totally unecesary

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions

2009-01-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662


Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA




--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-01-07 23:16:50 EDT ---
dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dustin-dustismo-fonts'.  You
can provide feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0309

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions

2009-01-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662





--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-01-07 23:19:01 EDT ---
dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update dustin-dustismo-fonts'. 
You can provide feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0322

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 479100] [kn_IN] Conjunct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly

2009-01-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100


Padmanabhan V. K. bugzillas+padremovethi...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|[kn_IN] Conjuct combination |[kn_IN] Conjunct
   |of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB   |combination of U0C9D with
   |is rendering wrongly|U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering
   ||wrongly




--- Comment #2 from Padmanabhan V. K. bugzillas+padremovethi...@gmail.com  
2009-01-07 23:35:31 EDT ---
Using the program from http://gfontview.sourceforge.net/ it is seen that there
already are glyphs in the font named U0C9D_U0CCA.pstf and U0C9D_U0CCB.pstf
which show the correct conjuncts. Only the mappings between the character
combinations and the glyphs to be displayed need to be added/corrected.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 428427] [kn_IN][fonts-indic] - 0CB5+0CCA is wrongly rendering

2009-01-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428427





--- Comment #6 from Padmanabhan V. K. bugzillas+padremovethi...@gmail.com  
2009-01-07 23:51:13 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=328437)
 -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328437)
Incorrect rendering of U0CAA U0CCA U0CAB U0CCA

Wrong Conjuct combinations are formed for U0CAA+U0CCA, U0CAB+U0CCA,
U0CAA+U0CCB, and U0CAB+U0CCB as well.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fonts-kannada-2.1.5-3.fc8

How reproducible:
1. Every Time

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open gnome-character-map.
2. Select U0CAA followed by U0CCA followed by U0CAB followed by U0CCA.

Actual results:
As shown in the attached image

Expected results:

As shown by the following steps:
1. Install http://kannadakasturi.com/font/brhknd.ttf.
2. Open http://kannadakasturi.com/includes/transliterate.asp.
3. Enter the combination poPo.

Additional info:

1. The fonts from http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=56358
also show the glyphs like kannadakasturi.com instead of like Lohit Kannada.
2. This is similar to the earlier issue reported here.
3. Using the program from http://gfontview.sourceforge.net/ it is seen that
there already are glyphs in the font named U0CAC_U0CCA.pstf [can be renamed to
the more appropriate U0CAA_U0CCA.pstf?] and U0CAB_U0CC3.abvs_U0CC0.psts [can be
renamed to U0CAB_U0CCA.pstf?] which show the conjuncts like kannadakasturi.com.
Only the mappings between the character combinations and the glyphs to be
displayed seem to be incorrect.

Hence I assume Lohit Kannada is at fault and not the other fonts.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


rpms/cjkunifonts/devel cjkunifonts.spec,1.28,1.29

2009-01-07 Thread Caius Chance
Author: cchance

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21724

Modified Files:
cjkunifonts.spec 
Log Message:
repatched rev 11



Index: cjkunifonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel/cjkunifonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.28
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -u -r1.28 -r1.29
--- cjkunifonts.spec6 Jan 2009 02:24:34 -   1.28
+++ cjkunifonts.spec8 Jan 2009 07:00:44 -   1.29
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
 Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts derived from the original fonts generously made 
\available by Arphic Technology under the Arphic Public License and extended \
 by the CJK Unifonts project.
 
+%define umingbuilddir   ../%{name}-uming-%{version}
+%define ukaibuilddir../%{name}-ukai-%{version}
 %define umingfontdir%{_datadir}/fonts/%{name}-uming
 %define ukaifontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{name}-ukai
 %define cidmapdir   %{_datadir}/ghostscript/conf.d
@@ -12,7 +14,7 @@
 
 Name:%{fontname}
 Version: 0.2.20080216.1
-Release: 11.2%{?dist}
+Release: 12%{?dist}
 Summary: Chinese TrueType Fonts -- Simplified and Traditional Chinese Ming 
and Kai Face
 License: Arphic
 Group:   User Interface/X
@@ -95,23 +97,23 @@
 install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \
 %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}
 
-cd %{name}-uming-%{version}
+cd %{umingbuilddir}
 for fconf in `ls *-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf`
 do
 install -m 0644 $fconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/
-ln -s %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \
-%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf
+cd %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/  \
+ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf $fconf  \
+cd -
 done
-cd ..
-
-cd %{name}-ukai-%{version}
+cd %{ukaibuilddir}
 for fconf in `ls *-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf`
 do
 install -m 0644 $fconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/
-ln -s %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \
-%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf
+cd %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/  \
+ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf $fconf  \
+cd -
 done
-cd ..
+cd -
 
 # backward compat
 install -d %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType
@@ -176,14 +178,15 @@
 %dir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW
 %dir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType
 %dir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType
-%{umingfontdir}/*.ttc
-%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf
 %{cidmapdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW
 %{cidmapdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN
 %{cidmapdir}/cidfmap.zh_TW
 %{cidmapdir}/cidfmap.zh_CN
 %{cidmapdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_TW
 %{cidmapdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_CN
+%{umingfontdir}/*.ttc
+%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf
+%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontconfig_confdir}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf
 %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{umingfontdir}/fonts.dir
 %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{umingfontdir}/fonts.scale
 %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType/zysong.ttf
@@ -203,20 +206,21 @@
 %doc %{ukaibuilddir}/README
 %doc %{ukaibuilddir}/TODO
 %dir %{ukaifontdir}
-%{ukaifontdir}/*.ttc
-%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf
 %{cidmapdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW
 %{cidmapdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN
 %{cidmapdir}/cidfmap.zh_TW
 %{cidmapdir}/cidfmap.zh_CN
 %{cidmapdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_TW
 %{cidmapdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_CN
+%{ukaifontdir}/*.ttc
+%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf
+%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontconfig_confdir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf
 %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{ukaifontdir}/fonts.dir
 %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{ukaifontdir}/fonts.scale
 %{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai
 
 %changelog
-* Tue Jan 06 2009 Caius Chance cchance at redhat.com - 
0.2.20080216.1-11.2.fc11
+* Tue Jan 06 2009 Caius Chance cchance at redhat.com - 0.2.20080216.1-12.fc11
 - Resolves: rhbz#477373 (Converted to new font packaging guidelines.)
 
 * Sun Dec  7 2008 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com - 
0.2.20080216.1-10.fc11

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11

2009-01-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044


Bug 477044 depends on bug 477373, which changed state.

Bug 477373 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution||RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373


Caius CHANCE ccha...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution||RAWHIDE




--- Comment #3 from Caius CHANCE ccha...@redhat.com  2009-01-08 02:22:47 EDT 
---
built

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=77668

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332


Caius CHANCE ccha...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Fwd: Account Security Question]

2009-01-07 Thread Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
For your consideration.

 Forwarded Message 
From: Michael Tant mtant...@charter.net
To: webmas...@fedoraproject.org
Subject: Account Security Question
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:22:20 -0500

Upon creating my account on the fedoraproject site, I was asked to
submit a public key and download a client certificate.  First, what is
the public key used for?  I sent a 1024 rsa pubkey made with ssh-keygen.
Does it have to be rsa or can I change that to a 2048 dsa key?  I
commonly use my windows side to access the internet and my linux side
more as a server than a terminal side, though it has client side
available.  Should the dsa public key be kept on the browser side, or
isolated to the linux side?  The Private Key is kept offline on
removable media.
 
In regards to the certificate, it requests I add this to a particular
location in the system.  Is the certificate used to authenticate my
sessions with fedoraproject or just for the purposes of linux
developing?  If it is used for authentication, can this be used on a
windows based system, or should I login from my linux side?  I'm not a
developer as of yet, my programming skills are hardly up to par yet.
Regardless of the use, events of yesterday lead me to ask, is this a MD5
hash or SHA1 or SHA2 hash?  I ask this because of the collision exploit
to md5 certificates.  Please let me know, and if it is a MD5 hash, can I
request a SHA clientside certificate?  
 
Being new to Linux, I am thrilled to to have membership in
fedoraproject, as I have found linux nearly superior to windows in many
areas.  
 
Thank You,
 
Michael Tant

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams ivazquez...@gmail.com


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: [Fwd: Account Security Question]

2009-01-07 Thread Ricky Zhou
On 2009-01-07 02:56:43 PM, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
 For your consideration.
 
  Forwarded Message 
 From: Michael Tant mtant...@charter.net
 To: webmas...@fedoraproject.org
 Subject: Account Security Question
 Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:22:20 -0500
 
 Upon creating my account on the fedoraproject site, I was asked to
 submit a public key and download a client certificate.  First, what is
 the public key used for?  I sent a 1024 rsa pubkey made with ssh-keygen.
 Does it have to be rsa or can I change that to a 2048 dsa key?  I
 commonly use my windows side to access the internet and my linux side
 more as a server than a terminal side, though it has client side
 available.  Should the dsa public key be kept on the browser side, or
 isolated to the linux side?  The Private Key is kept offline on
 removable media.
The public key is used if you need to authenticate to any of our
services over SSH.  This includes commit access for CVS and other
code repositories or any shell access to our machines.  We currently
require RSA keys.  You'll want to have your private key available on any
machine that you use to SSH or commit code from.  The public key is only
needed on the machines that will be accepting your private key (which is
why we ask for it).

 In regards to the certificate, it requests I add this to a particular
 location in the system.  Is the certificate used to authenticate my
 sessions with fedoraproject or just for the purposes of linux
 developing?  If it is used for authentication, can this be used on a
 windows based system, or should I login from my linux side?  I'm not a
 developer as of yet, my programming skills are hardly up to par yet.
 Regardless of the use, events of yesterday lead me to ask, is this a MD5
 hash or SHA1 or SHA2 hash?  I ask this because of the collision exploit
 to md5 certificates.  Please let me know, and if it is a MD5 hash, can I
 request a SHA clientside certificate?  
This certificiate is currently only used to authenticate to koji and
plague, the buildsystems for Fedora and EPEL, although we're considering
using key authentication in more places in the future. Right now, you'll
only need a copy of it if you plan on becoming a package maintainer.

 Being new to Linux, I am thrilled to to have membership in
 fedoraproject, as I have found linux nearly superior to windows in many
 areas.  
Welcome!

Thanks,
Ricky


pgpwZFqtRQJr4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


FUDCon

2009-01-07 Thread Mike McGrath
Just a reminder to everyone, FUDCon is on the way soon.  Many of us
(myself included) will be traveling and not as available as usual.
Please be extra careful about any changes you make.

For example, don't make a change to our global.pp file and then get on an
air plane.

-Mike

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: FUDCon

2009-01-07 Thread Nigel Jones
I'll be sitting here in Brisbane if there is any urgentish issues during 
Brisbane hours (UTC+10), might as well let the FUDCon'ers have their fun :)

- Nigel
- Original Message -
From: Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com
To: Fedora Infrastructure List fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2009 3:14:29 PM GMT +10:00 Brisbane
Subject: FUDCon

Just a reminder to everyone, FUDCon is on the way soon.  Many of us
(myself included) will be traveling and not as available as usual.
Please be extra careful about any changes you make.

For example, don't make a change to our global.pp file and then get on an
air plane.

-Mike

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


/proc/sys/fs/epoll/max_user_instances=128 considered harmful

2009-01-07 Thread Joe Orton
The F10 kernel has /proc/sys/fs/epoll/max_user_instances set to 128 by 
default.  Apache httpd uses one epoll fd (instance) per child process, 
so this sets a hard limit on 128 children (i.e. 100 concurrent clients) 
out of the box.

1) shouldn't this be an rlimit so that we can bump it appropriately in 
the parent as root?

2) can we get it tweaked in the default sysctl.conf to be something more 
sane, e.g. 1024?

Regards, Joe

___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list


Re: /proc/sys/fs/epoll/max_user_instances=128 considered harmful

2009-01-07 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 03:18:12PM +, Joe Orton wrote:
  The F10 kernel has /proc/sys/fs/epoll/max_user_instances set to 128 by 
  default.  Apache httpd uses one epoll fd (instance) per child process, 
  so this sets a hard limit on 128 children (i.e. 100 concurrent clients) 
  out of the box.
  
  1) shouldn't this be an rlimit so that we can bump it appropriately in 
  the parent as root?

possibly.  It's a question better asked on linux-kernel really. 

This does sound like a better change to me than forcing the sysctl change
on everyone.

Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list


Re: Enabling drivers in staging tree in rawhide

2009-01-07 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis

CCing fedora-kernel

On 08.01.2009 03:49, Rahul Sundaram wrote:

Quite a bit of new drivers in
http://lwn.net/Articles/313730/


Related: I raised the staging problem already in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477927
as rawhide contained the at76 driver as separate patch
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewvc/rpms/kernel/devel/linux-2.6-at76.patch?view=markup
-- but the same driver (with two small changes) also was part of the 
upstream kernel since October/2.6.28-rc as one of the staging drivers:

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=99e06e372378c5833a0c60274b645dfb2e4a4b08
(for more details see bug).

That sounds wrong to me, as

- it's duplicated work

- the at76 staging driver from upstream taints the kernel; the driver 
from our patch doesn't.


The ralink wireless drivers for example would hopefully make the newer 
EEE PC model would out of the box.  Does it make sense to enable the 
drivers in staging tree by default and bring more exposure to them 
atleast via rawhide if not in general releases?


+1 to the I think providing hardware support in rawhide and then 
removing it  before release would be somewhat user-hostile. comment 
from mjg59.


IOW: Either enable or disable them. I'm unsure myself what to do but I 
tend to say that disabling the whole staging drivers might be the best 
for Fedora (Greg calls himself as maintainer of crap for a good reason).


@Davej, Cebbert and Kylem: What's your position on this?

If they are disabled completely in Fedora then I'll nevertheless 
consider to create a kmod-staging package for RPM Fusion.


CU
knurd

___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list


get free cd fedora 10

2009-01-07 Thread harry sedeng
How can I get cd Fedora 10?
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Installing Fedora 9 on an old dual xeon w/scsi

2009-01-07 Thread Aaron
a bit of background..  I am a newb who just recently became interested in
setting up a home server and Amahi caught my attention, which requries 
fedora 9..  

I am running a dual xeon 1.7 and trying to install to a 17gig scsi.

I followed all indications and downloaded the x86_64 dvd iso and burned it
without issue.

Upon bootup I got the msg that it was the wrong kernel and that I needed an
i1586..  After a bit of poking around I found that this is the msg you 
get when
you are trying to install 64 bit on 32 bit.  

So I downloaded the i386 dvd iso and burned it without issue.

It gets a bit further in the vmlinuz, until you hit agpgart: Detected an 
intel
i860 chipset, and then hangs (keyboard locked, 3 finger salute no worky)

Now before I go and download another version, I need to know which 
version thatmight be if it isn't either one of the 2 I have already 
tried?  If the version isn't the problem, then what can I do/change 
about what I am doing to make this
puppy fly?

Thanks for the help,

Aaron

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: get free cd fedora 10

2009-01-07 Thread Ed Greshko
harry sedeng wrote:
 How can I get cd Fedora 10?
http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora

-- 
Most people can't understand how others can blow their noses differently
than they do. -- Turgenev mei-mei.gres...@greshko.com
http://tw.youtube.com/watch?v=cCSz_koUhSg


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: NetworkManager: IP address == Broadcast address?

2009-01-07 Thread Patrick

Rick Stevens wrote:
[snip]

Question:
Is this a bug? I'm no IP addressing expert so IP address == broadcast 
address might be valid.


It is absolutely incorrect.  Your NIC should NOT have the broadcast
address as its IP address.


Thanks. That's good to know.

[snip]


I believe there is/was a bug in NM, so make sure you update it.  You may
have to hand-edit the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ppp0 script
to fix it.


My system is already updated and there's no newer NetworkManager. In 
updates-testing I only see an update to NetworkManager-openvpn.


Unfortunately The ifcfg-ppp0 script you refer to does not exist on my 
system. The only ones I have on my laptop are:


[r...@localhost ~]# locate ifcfg-
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-lo
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-wlan0
/usr/lib64/NetworkManager/libnm-settings-plugin-ifcfg-fedora.so
/usr/share/doc/irda-utils-0.9.18/ifcfg-irlan0

Any ideas?

Thanks,
Patrick

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Installing Fedora 9 on an old dual xeon w/scsi

2009-01-07 Thread Alan Cox
 So I downloaded the i386 dvd iso and burned it without issue.

That DVD should work.

 It gets a bit further in the vmlinuz, until you hit agpgart: Detected an 
 intel
 i860 chipset, and then hangs (keyboard locked, 3 finger salute no worky)

That would be a bug.

 Now before I go and download another version, I need to know which 
 version thatmight be if it isn't either one of the 2 I have already 
 tried?  If the version isn't the problem, then what can I do/change 
 about what I am doing to make this
 puppy fly?

The install guide has some suggestions on boot options you can try. It
may also be worth checking if any related hangs were fixed in updates -
if so then Fedora 10 or the Fedora 9 respins might work better. Offhand I
can't remember one, or a matching bug report but others may know.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Is this problem solvable?

2009-01-07 Thread Giuseppe Fuggiano
2009/1/7 Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net:
 Before leaving home on a visit to Italy (where I am now)
Welcome to Italy ;)

 I noticed that shorewall did not print out its usual messages,
Which messages?

 but foolishly did not check what caused this.
 Now I can ping the machine,
If you can ping the machine so I guess it's up and running.

 but cannot ssh into it (I chose a strange port)
 or access its web-server.
If you got that port reachable from the internet, but you don't
remember the ssh port number you used, you could scan your IP to
discover it using, for example, nmap.

 My question is: given that I can ping the machine,
 is there any way I can re-boot it remotely,
 or even just re-start shorewall?
No, using ping only :-)

Cheers
-- 
Giuseppe Fuggiano

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Single mouse click interpreted as a double click

2009-01-07 Thread Paul Smith
Dear All,

I am using F10 and I am noticing recently that when I click once on
the mouse button, sometimes, my single click is interpreted as a
double one. How can I fix it? Is this a bug?

Thanks in advance,

Paul

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Lost audio on headphones (F9)

2009-01-07 Thread mstorti
I had the same problem with Fedora 10. The headphones didn't work
after an update I did yesterday (Jan 6, 2009).  I have currently alsa
driver version 1.0.8. They were shipped from the start with Fedora 10,
so that it seems that the drivers were not the problem.

Then I tried to use the previous version of the kernel and now the
headphones work again!!

The previous version that works OK is: 2.6.27.7-134.fc10.x86_64
The version that doesn't work is: 2.6.27.9-159.fc10.x86_64

This thread in the forum helped my A LOT. 

Thanks,

Mario

-
Mario Alberto Storti [cel. +54-342-156144983]
CIMEC (INTEC/CONICET-UNL), Guemes 3450 - 3000 Santa Fe, Argentina
Tel: +54-342-4511594 (ext 1015), Tel/Fax: +54-342-4511169
e-mail: mario.storti at gmail.com
http://www.cimec.org.ar/mstorti [1]
-


Links:
--
[1] http://www.cimec.org.ar/mstorti


-- 
This is an email sent via The Fedora Community Portal https://fcp.surfsite.org
https://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=316848topic_id=64016forum=10#forumpost316848
If you think, this is spam, please report this to webmas...@fcp.surfsite.org 
and/or blame mario.sto...@gmail.com.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Help -- can't SSH into my box

2009-01-07 Thread John Aldrich
On Tuesday 06 January 2009, Stuart Sears wrote:

 Not wishing :) to open a massive can of worms (even though this probably
 will) but why do you hate it so much?

Precisely because it interferes with so many other things. If SELinux ever 
gets to the point where it plays nice with other things, or at least has 
a nice, easy ignore this app sort of thing (like antivirus/anti-spyware 
apps in Windoze) I might reconsider it. Until then, I'm going to disable it 
whenever possible.

I installed fail2ban and SELinux immediately threw up massive errors. I 
coudl understand that much better if it were some 3rd-party app, but 
something out of the default Fedora repos should be able to run w/o 
generating complaints from a security system. Fail2ban, especially, should 
be allowed to run w/o issue, due to the very nature of it.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Help -- can't SSH into my box

2009-01-07 Thread John Aldrich
On Tuesday 06 January 2009, Kevin Kofler wrote:

 As for quick launch icons, just right-click and Add to panel in the
 Kickoff menu, or dragdrop the menu entry to the panel in the classic
 menu. (You can right-click on the menu button and use Switch to Classic
 menu style to switch to the good old classic menu.)

  If that's the case, I think I'll switch back to Gnome, and just use my
  KDE apps.

 You can do that, but I'm sure KDE 4 _can_ be set up to your liking. :-)

Well, when KDE4.2 gets here, I'll give it another shot. :-)


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Help -- can't SSH into my box

2009-01-07 Thread Veli-Pekka Kestilä

John Aldrich wrote:

On Tuesday 06 January 2009, Stuart Sears wrote:
  

Not wishing :) to open a massive can of worms (even though this probably
will) but why do you hate it so much?

I installed fail2ban and SELinux immediately threw up massive errors. I 
coudl understand that much better if it were some 3rd-party app, but 
something out of the default Fedora repos should be able to run w/o 
generating complaints from a security system. Fail2ban, especially, should 
be allowed to run w/o issue, due to the very nature of it.


  
You have something strange in your setup if it throws lot of errors with 
fail2ban as I just recently installed it in F10 when I needed 
alternative to whitelisting just some ip-addresses. And it haven't given 
any errors. Actually in F10 i haven't had any selinux alerts yet. Of 
course I don't use it as desktop and there isn't currently users home 
directories (or part of them) shared trough httpd or samba. But it has 
just plain worked this far. I was suprised that even cyrus imapd worked 
out of the box without any problems and it's maybe less used that 
dovecot. Maybe you tried it with some early policy version which has 
been updated and now just works.


Anyway what I have worked with selinux on some customer installations 
it's not very hard to get it configured to work just the way you want if 
you just take littlebit time to understand it and how the rule system 
works. Of course I was first littlebit hesitant with it and usually 
disabled it, but that usually comes with the mindset of being system 
administrator (All change is for bad :).


Also if there is plain errors with it on basic configurations I think it 
would be worthwhile to file bugs on them so that they will get fixed.


Of course I didn't try to fix fail2ban to work with anything else than 
ssh as it's enough for me for now. So it could have problems with httpd 
or mailclient filtering enabled.


Veli-Pekka


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Mount usb drive with mount -a fails after f10 upgrade

2009-01-07 Thread Joe W. Byers

Jeff Spaleta wrote:

On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Joe W. Byers ecjb...@aol.com wrote:

Mount count:  8
Maximum mount count:  1
Last checked: Sat Jan  3 14:45:33 2009
Check interval:   15552000 (6 months)
Next check after: Thu Jul  2 15:45:33 2009



Take a moment and review what those lines in the tune2fs output mean

the ext2/ext3 filesystem can be configured via tune2fs to require a
fsck check periodically in two ways.  One is mount count and the other
is time interval since last check. You have both ways configured. And
more importantly...the filesystem is configured to require a check
after ONE mount!

The system is doing exactly what the filesystem superblock is asking
it to do..do an fsck after each mount.  This is not what you want.

use the tune2fs  -c option and set the maximum mount count to
something sane or turn it off completely.

-jef



Jeff,

I never set this. I hooked this drive up in 2005 and have been using 
without any issues since until this upgrade.  My server would reboot and 
notify me that this needed a check and I did it or did not.  Never was a 
problem until this upgrade.


The only interesting thing with EL5 was the usb would not mount during 
the normal mounting sequence but give me an [Failure], then mount later 
on during the boot up.  I never really worried about that because the 
usb drive was getting mounted automatically.  Now it is not and that is 
was I need.


Joe

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Flash player with Fedora 9

2009-01-07 Thread Leslie Satenstein
Go to the Fedora FAQ website and look for the information explaining how to 
install. I followed it and it worked­ just fine

--- On Tue, 1/6/09, Anne Wilson an...@kde.org wrote:
From: Anne Wilson an...@kde.org
Subject: Re: Flash player with Fedora 9
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. 
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: Tuesday, January 6, 2009, 7:54 AM

On Tuesday 06 January 2009 00:56:05 Jerry Ro wrote:
 hi,
 did anyone manager to install a flash player on fedora 9 with firefox?
 I followed the exact instructions from fedora (when it told me
install
 flash driver) and downloaded an rpm they suggested, installed it
using
 YUM, but it still won't work. (did it as root.)

 this is what happens when i try to run yum again on the package (at first
 it installed it, now after it is installed:)

 [r...@localhost jer]# yum install adobe-release-i386-1.0-1.noarch.rpm
 Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
 updates-newkey   | 2.3 kB
 00:00
 fedora   | 2.4 kB
 00:00
 updates  | 2.6 kB
 00:00
 adobe-linux-i386 |  951 B
 00:00
 primary.xml.gz   |  10 kB
 00:00
 adobe-linux-i386   17/17
 Setting up Install Process
 Parsing package install arguments
 Examining adobe-release-i386-1.0-1.noarch.rpm:
 adobe-release-i386-1.0-1.noarch
 adobe-release-i386-1.0-1.noarch.rpm: does not update installed package.
 Nothing to do

 which makes me believe it is installed.

 any ideas?

F9 required an extra package to be installed - IIRC it is called 
libflashsupport (could have a hyphen in there somewhere?)

Anne
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: Single mouse click interpreted as a double click

2009-01-07 Thread Martín Marqués
2009/1/7 Paul Smith phh...@gmail.com:
 Dear All,

 I am using F10 and I am noticing recently that when I click once on
 the mouse button, sometimes, my single click is interpreted as a
 double one. How can I fix it? Is this a bug?

Are you sure that the mouse is OK?


-- 
Martín Marqués
select 'martin.marques' || '@' || 'gmail.com'
DBA, Programador, Administrador

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Flash player with Fedora 9

2009-01-07 Thread iarly selbir
Jerry

Also, look here:

http://fedorasolved.org/browser-solutions/flash/?searchterm=flash


I hope helps you.


Regards,

- -
iarly selbir ( Ski0s )



On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Leslie Satenstein lsatenst...@yahoo.comwrote:

 Go to the Fedora FAQ website and look for the information explaining how to
 install. I followed it and it worked­ just fine

 --- On *Tue, 1/6/09, Anne Wilson an...@kde.org* wrote:

 From: Anne Wilson an...@kde.org
 Subject: Re: Flash player with Fedora 9
 To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. 
 fedora-list@redhat.com
 Date: Tuesday, January 6, 2009, 7:54 AM


 On Tuesday 06 January 2009 00:56:05 Jerry Ro wrote:
  hi,
  did anyone manager to install a flash player on fedora 9 with firefox?
  I followed the exact instructions from fedora (when it told me
 install
  flash driver) and downloaded an rpm they suggested, installed it
 using
  YUM,
  but it still won't work. (did it as root.)
 
  this is what happens when i try to run yum again on the package (at first
  it installed it, now after it is installed:)
 
  [r...@localhost jer]# yum install adobe-release-i386-1.0-1.noarch.rpm
  Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
  updates-newkey   | 2.3 kB
  00:00
  fedora   | 2.4 kB
  00:00
  updates  | 2.6 kB
  00:00
  adobe-linux-i386 |  951 B
  00:00
  primary.xml.gz   |  10 kB
  00:00
  adobe-linux-i386   17/17
  Setting up Install Process
  Parsing package install arguments
  Examining
  adobe-release-i386-1.0-1.noarch.rpm:
  adobe-release-i386-1.0-1.noarch
  adobe-release-i386-1.0-1.noarch.rpm: does not update installed package.
  Nothing to do
 
  which makes me believe it is installed.
 
  any ideas?
 
 F9 required an extra package to be installed - IIRC it is called
 libflashsupport (could have a hyphen in there somewhere?)

 Anne

 --
 fedora-list mailing list
 fedora-list@redhat.com
 To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
 Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


 --
 fedora-list mailing list
 fedora-list@redhat.com
 To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
 Guidelines:
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: Fedora 9, OpenOffice 3 and Arial Black

2009-01-07 Thread Craig White
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 13:04 +0200, Nicolae Ghimbovschi wrote:
 It seems that Openoffice 3 (the build from openoffice.org) in Fedora 9
 can't use the arial black ttf font.
 While in F10 Openoffice 3(fedora build) can.
 
 fc-list : family file | grep Arial
 /usr/share/fonts/drakfnt/ttf/arial.ttf: Arial
 /usr/share/fonts/drakfnt/ttf/ariali.ttf: Arial
 /usr/share/fonts/drakfnt/ttf/ARLRDBD.ttf: Arial Rounded MT Bold
 /usr/share/fonts/drakfnt/ttf/arialbd.ttf: Arial
 /usr/share/fonts/drakfnt/ttf/arialbi.ttf: Arial
 /usr/share/fonts/drakfnt/ttf/ARIALUNI.ttf: Arial Unicode MS
 /usr/share/fonts/drakfnt/ttf/ariblk.ttf: Arial,Arial Black
 
 It is very weird that ariblk.ttf can't be used by the same version of
 OpenOffice 3 in different versions of Fedora.
 
 I just don't understand, what exactly is different.
 

maybe there's something wrong with your Arial Black font. Did you
install it from msttcorefonts at sourceforge.net?

Craig

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


F10 -- Failure to create ./resolv.conf.predhclient.eth0

2009-01-07 Thread McGuffey, David C.
Finally got some time to install F10 yesterday.  Wiped away a working F7
install to do so.  Selected dhcp to get up and running, and all worked
A-OK.  After the first reboot, I went back to configure static
addressing on eth0.

The operation failed and I received an SELinux alert that stated:
SELinux is preventing mv (dhcp_t) create to
./resolv.conf.predhclient.eth0 (net_conf_t).

The SELinux recommendation was to execute: 
restorecon -v './resolv.conf.predhclient.eth0'

That operation failed with a file not found message.

A search of the filesystem did not turn up a copy of the
file...anywhere.  So...there is no file for mv to use as the source.

I reconfigured and went back to dhcp, but that fails.  I now have no
network connectivity with either dhcp or static addressing.

Any ideas?

BTW, from first glance, I really like F10.

Dave McGuffey
Principal Information System Security Engineer // NSA-IEM, NSA-IAM
SAIC, IISBU, Columbia, MD
Save a Tree...Unless necessary don't print this e-mail


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Fedora 9, OpenOffice 3 and Arial Black

2009-01-07 Thread Nicolae Ghimbovschi
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 16:04, Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com wrote:
 On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 13:04 +0200, Nicolae Ghimbovschi wrote:
 It seems that Openoffice 3 (the build from openoffice.org) in Fedora 9
 can't use the arial black ttf font.
 While in F10 Openoffice 3(fedora build) can.

 fc-list : family file | grep Arial
 /usr/share/fonts/drakfnt/ttf/arial.ttf: Arial
 /usr/share/fonts/drakfnt/ttf/ariali.ttf: Arial
 /usr/share/fonts/drakfnt/ttf/ARLRDBD.ttf: Arial Rounded MT Bold
 /usr/share/fonts/drakfnt/ttf/arialbd.ttf: Arial
 /usr/share/fonts/drakfnt/ttf/arialbi.ttf: Arial
 /usr/share/fonts/drakfnt/ttf/ARIALUNI.ttf: Arial Unicode MS
 /usr/share/fonts/drakfnt/ttf/ariblk.ttf: Arial,Arial Black

 It is very weird that ariblk.ttf can't be used by the same version of
 OpenOffice 3 in different versions of Fedora.

 I just don't understand, what exactly is different.

 
 maybe there's something wrong with your Arial Black font. Did you
I don't think so, because the same font works great in OO3 from F10 .

 install it from msttcorefonts at sourceforge.net?
I didn't install msttcorefonts, I copied all fonts manually.


 Craig

 --
 fedora-list mailing list
 fedora-list@redhat.com
 To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
 Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Help -- can't SSH into my box

2009-01-07 Thread Chris Snook

Tim wrote:

On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 15:17 -0500, John Aldrich wrote:

From what I've read, it appeared that there was no way to *not* have
selinux and that the best you could do was to have it run in
permissive mode. I'll have to give that a shot.


Incorrect.  Whilst it's a recompile-everything-yourself customisation
nightmare to rip it out of a system, you can disable it.



Not so.  You can completely disable it with selinux=0 on the kernel command 
line.

-- Chris

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Is this problem solvable?

2009-01-07 Thread Chris Snook

Timothy Murphy wrote:

Before leaving home on a visit to Italy (where I am now)
I re-booted my server.
I noticed that shorewall did not print out its usual messages,
but foolishly did not check what caused this.
Now I can ping the machine,
but cannot ssh into it (I chose a strange port)
or access its web-server.

My question is: given that I can ping the machine,
is there any way I can re-boot it remotely,
or even just re-start shorewall?


If there is, it's a very serious bug.

-- Chris

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Upgrade to OpenOffice 3 on F9

2009-01-07 Thread Dave Feustel
Is there a way to upgrade from OpenOffice 2.4 to 3.0 on f9?

Thanks.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: xml editors for f9

2009-01-07 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote:
 Dave Feustel wrote:
 I've been looking for an xml editor to use on F9,
 but so far I am batting 0%. I have tried a couple
 of proprietary xml editors, but they don't work
 on my system. Are there any opensource xml editors
 that run on F9?


 Where have you looked?

 open source xml editor  google search returns results.  Have you tried
 any of those?

free xml editor linux also gives a bunch of results, the first one
of which is a page devoted to free editors (though it's not clear in
which sense of free).

poc

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Is this problem solvable?

2009-01-07 Thread Seann Clark

Chris Snook wrote:

Timothy Murphy wrote:

Before leaving home on a visit to Italy (where I am now)
I re-booted my server.
I noticed that shorewall did not print out its usual messages,
but foolishly did not check what caused this.
Now I can ping the machine,
but cannot ssh into it (I chose a strange port)
or access its web-server.

My question is: given that I can ping the machine,
is there any way I can re-boot it remotely,
or even just re-start shorewall?


If there is, it's a very serious bug.

-- Chris

To do it yourself would be a bad bad bug, as Chris mentioned. Now, doing 
it the manual way, if you have a person available that has physical 
access to the server, you can reboot it remotely, and restart shorewall 
rather easily and without a bad security hole.





~Seann


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: HiJacking Threads Was: hostapd for Fedora 10

2009-01-07 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote:
 Don't you think that would be a time wasting sorting
 practice...especially when you consider that there could be multiple
 unique threads, each with dozens of messages in a given folder?

Most modern mail clients seem to cache this information in local
files, same as they do with index info (to avoid having to parse a
potentially huge mbox file every time they visit a folder).

 Don't
 you think using another header designed to help that task would be useful?

Of course I do. I have nothing against the References header. My only
point is that In-Reply-To is still very much in use.

This is really getting quite OT. The original issue was that Subject
threading is only ever used as a last resort (at least in Linux/Unix
clients) so people messing with it in the hope of changing the thread
topology are wasting their own and everyone else's time.

poc

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Firefox 3.05 attempting to execute code on stack

2009-01-07 Thread Bryn M. Reeves

Dave Feustel wrote:

SELinux is reporting attempts by Firefox 3.05-1 to execute code
on the stack on 32-bit f9. Time for a Firefox upgrade?



Java plugin?

Bryn.

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


ftp question

2009-01-07 Thread adrian kok
Hi

When I change this file /etc/passwd

from /home/userA to /ftp/userA

eg:
userA:x:502:502::/ftp/userA:/bin/bash

After change this passwd file, I can't logon as ftp

but ssh is fine

Thank you


Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com 

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Upgrade to OpenOffice 3 on F9

2009-01-07 Thread Craig White
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 09:39 -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
 Is there a way to upgrade from OpenOffice 2.4 to 3.0 on f9?
 

not in a supported way but...

you could either install packages from OOo or try rebuilding SRPM's from
F10.

If it were me, I would just upgrade to F10 and get upgrade goodness
beyond OOo 3

Craig

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: HiJacking Threads Was: hostapd for Fedora 10

2009-01-07 Thread Ed Greshko
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
 On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote:
   
 Don't you think that would be a time wasting sorting
 practice...especially when you consider that there could be multiple
 unique threads, each with dozens of messages in a given folder?
 

 Most modern mail clients seem to cache this information in local
 files, same as they do with index info (to avoid having to parse a
 potentially huge mbox file every time they visit a folder).
   
Yet, it is good to know that they don't rely only solely on the
In-Reply-To header...as you've found out.
   
 Don't
 you think using another header designed to help that task would be useful?
 

 Of course I do. I have nothing against the References header. My only
 point is that In-Reply-To is still very much in use.
   
Nobody ever claimed that it wasn't being utilized. 
 This is really getting quite OT. The original issue was that Subject
 threading is only ever used as a last resort (at least in Linux/Unix
 clients) so people messing with it in the hope of changing the thread
 topology are wasting their own and everyone else's time.

   


-- 
It was the most I ever threw up, and it changed my life forever. --
Homer Simpson Homer Goes To College mei-mei.gres...@greshko.com
http://tw.youtube.com/watch?v=cCSz_koUhSg



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: Netbook wifi, wlan0 and inet6 address (F10)

2009-01-07 Thread Steven I Usdansky
I'm running wpa_supplicant, but right now I'm on an unprotected network. 
network is not running:

~# service network status
Configured devices:
lo eth0 pan0 wlan0
Currently active devices:
lo eth0 wmaster0 wlan0

~# chkconfig --list network 
network 0:off   1:off   2:off   3:off   4:off   5:off   6:off
~# chkconfig --list NetworkManager
NetworkManager  0:off   1:off   2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off

Looks like you're using the madwifi driver. I haven't used it on my AA1 in
Fedora as the ath5k driver in the newer kernels have been working for me. 
Nothing atheros-related is blacklisted in /etc/modprobe.d; /etc.modprobe.conf 
is empty.

/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts# cat ifcfg-wlan0
# Atheros Communications Inc. AR242x 802.11abg Wireless PCI Express Adapter
DEVICE=wlan0
HWADDR=00:22:69:92:f3:a3

/etc/sysconfig# cat network
NETWORKING=yes
HOSTNAME=Labradorite

Nothing particularly interesting that I can see in sysconfig, but I've included 
it just in case.



  

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Which part of Kernel contains /Documnetation/DocBook?

2009-01-07 Thread hutx
Thank Giuseppe.

Can I use make menuconfig to install or compile
compile to get this dir?


--- Giuseppe Fuggiano giuseppe.fuggi...@gmail.com
wrote:

 2009/1/7 hutx h...@yahoo.com:
 
  I am buliding a project which needs to complile
 linux
  Kernel.
  It builds
 

/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-1.2798.fc6-i686/Documentation/DocBook/Makefile.
 
 Generally it's wrong to compile the linux kernel
 into /usr/src/.  You
 should download the Linux source code from
 http://www.kernel.org/
 where you can choose the precise version you are
 looking for.
 
 By the way, I don't know if Fedora does provide some
 particular kernel
 patches you should also apply (obviously at your
 choice), but I guess
 yes.
 
 -- 
 Giuseppe Fuggiano
 
 -- 
 fedora-list mailing list
 fedora-list@redhat.com
 To unsubscribe:
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
 Guidelines:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
 



  

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: HiJacking Threads Was: hostapd for Fedora 10

2009-01-07 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
 Tim:
 You can test for that yourself with any collection of messages belonging
 to a thread, remove the messages linked directly together by the
 in-reply-to headers.  (Copy a thread to a test folder, remove the every
 second generation of messages.)

 Patrick O'Callaghan:
 That's an ingenious idea. I tried it with Evolution and indeed it
 works, so Evo at least *does* appear to take note of the References
 header. All the same, when I delete the common parent of two messages
 (which were previously at the same hierarchical level) then one
 appears as the parent of the other, even when I turn off the fall
 back on Subject threading option, so the conclusion is not completely
 iron-clad, i.e. Evo seems to be doing something else (I checked
 carefully that neither message had the Message-ID of the other
 anywhere in its headers.)

 Do you have another client installed to compare behaviours?

 I think the fall back might be additionally sort by date, but I'd expect
 them to appear as children to the initial post.  Though the order of
 messages listed in the references header might be used.

I did a cursory test with Thunderbird (not the current version but a
preview of version 3, so it might not apply to v2) and it seems to be
basically the same as Evo. One thing I noticed is that when a parent
is deleted the first descendant is promoted to be the new parent, even
if other siblings exist, i.e. there's no representation of a missing
parent. The eldest son takes over as head of the family :-) This also
applies to Evo.

poc

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Upgrade to OpenOffice 3 on F9

2009-01-07 Thread Dave Feustel
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 08:02:03AM -0700, Craig White wrote:
 On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 09:39 -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
  Is there a way to upgrade from OpenOffice 2.4 to 3.0 on f9?
  
 
 not in a supported way but...
 
 you could either install packages from OOo or try rebuilding SRPM's from
 F10.
 
 If it were me, I would just upgrade to F10 and get upgrade goodness
 beyond OOo 3
 
 Craig

Upgrading is my goal, but I want to install on a new disk so as not to
wipe out f9 until I know f10 works ok.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: NetworkManager: IP address == Broadcast address?

2009-01-07 Thread Chris Snook

Rick Stevens wrote:

Patrick wrote:

Hi,

Problem: Internet via a Nokia from a laptop with F10 x86_64 does not 
(no longer?) work. Assigned IP address on laptop is the same as the 
broadcast address.


A laptop with up-to-date Fedora 10 x86_64, NetworkManager version 
0.7.0-0.12.svn4326, a Nokia E71 and a USB cable for use between the 
Nokia and the laptop. The Nokia has a working permanent GPRS Internet 
connection. Steps I do to setup a link between the laptop and Nokia:


1) I added the T-Mobile mobile broadband profile in NetworkManager
2) I plug the USB cable into the phone and laptop and select PC Suite
   on the phone when asked
3) I select the T-Mobile profile in NetworkManager
4) NM starts chewing and reports after a few secs that a connection has
   been setup

Result:
Internet no longer works on the Nokia nor from the laptop via the 
Nokia. In NetworkManager I select Connection Information and notice 
that the IP address and Broadcast address are the same. Pings fail 
except to the public IP address assigned to the laptop.


Question:
Is this a bug? I'm no IP addressing expert so IP address == broadcast 
address might be valid.


It is absolutely incorrect.  Your NIC should NOT have the broadcast
address as its IP address.


Not so.  PPP doesn't have subnets the way ethernet does, so broadcast is 
meaningless in this context.  Your netmask should always be 255.255.255.255 for 
a PPP connection, so the only address that could possibly be calculated for a 
broadcast address is your own IP address.


The only bug is that NetworkManager is showing a broadcast address at all for a 
PPP connection.  It should probably not do that, to avoid exactly this sort of 
confusion.


-- Chris

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Firefox 3.05 attempting to execute code on stack

2009-01-07 Thread Bryn M. Reeves

Dave Feustel wrote:

On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 02:54:06PM +, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:

Dave Feustel wrote:

SELinux is reporting attempts by Firefox 3.05-1 to execute code
on the stack on 32-bit f9. Time for a Firefox upgrade?


Java plugin?

Bryn.


I have no idea. Maybe something to do with Flash.


Possibly, although I doubt it - I've never seen a flash plugin that 
attempted this but I have seen a number of JVMs do it (I assume it's 
something to do with jit), mostly older ones iirc, so it's probably 
worth checking for updates if you have a JRE installed that's not part 
of the distribution.


Bryn.

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: best video card for fedora 10

2009-01-07 Thread Leslie Satenstein
ATI and Nvidia cannot match what Intel provides in terms of video drivers.  
Video using Intel is flawless. Cannot say the same for the other two.

Leslie

--- On Mon, 1/5/09, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak m...@avtechpulse.com wrote:
From: Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak m...@avtechpulse.com
Subject: Re: best video card for fedora 10
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. 
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: Monday, January 5, 2009, 9:11 AM

Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
 
 Stick with the motherboard's onboard Intel graphics. Supports 3D and
works great on the modern desktop. No proprietary drivers required. Just install
system and go!

Unless you have one of the new systems like the HP DC7900, which has Intel
graphics and a DisplayPort connector... and no other video connectors...

DisplayPort is not yet supported by the intel driver, at all.

I slapped in an ATI card to gain a DVI port, and used the open driver. Works
fine now.

- Mike



-- fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: df hangs -- nfs related problem

2009-01-07 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Rick Stevens ri...@nerd.com wrote:
 Aldo Foot wrote:

 I have a NFS client in which the df commands hangs. I have to manually
 kill it to get back to the prompt.

 The client had a nfs export mounted, but as of now the export is not
 available to the client, and the client is trying to access it.
 Is there a way to terminate the nfs mount on the client?
 There are no messages in the log files pointing to this.

 I know its a nfs problem because strace bails out when it tries
 to access /mnt/nfs.

 **command output trimmed for clarity.

 % strace df -h
 statfs64(/proc/fs/nfsd, 84, {f_type=0x6e667364, f_bsize=4096,
 f_blocks=0, \
 f_bfree=0, f_bavail=0, f_files=0, f_ffree=0, f_fsid={0, 0},
 f_namelen=255, f_frsize=4096}) = 0
 statfs64(/mnt/nfs, 84,

 The mtab shows the export
nfsclient cat /etc/mtab
nfsserver:/stor1 /mnt/nfs nfs rw,addr=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 0 0

 The mount command also shows the relevant line.
   nfsclient mount -l
   nfsserver:/stor1 on /mnt/nfs type nfs (rw,addr=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx)

 Umount says the nfs export is busy --but there is nothing there.
   nfsclient umount nfsserver:/stor1
   umount: /mnt/nfs: device is busy
   umount: /mnt/nfs: device is busy

 Cannot see what processes (if any) are accessing nfsserver:/stor1 because
 the lsof command hangs just like df.

 Umount does not find anything either.
   nfsclient umount /stor1
   umount: /stor1: not found

 A cron job created a number of df processes over several days that I had
 to kill manually on the nfsclient.

 Does anyone have a tip about this? A web search did not yield much.

 Try lsof | grep nfs to see if anything has the mountpoint open.  If
 not, try umount -f /mnt/nfs as the root user to try a forced umount.

 Also check to see if the mount command (or /etc/fstab entry) has hard
 specified (that's the default as well).  Unless you're really certain
 about the stability of the network and of the NFS server, I'd recommend
 you specify soft in the mount command (see man 5 nfs for details).

That would depend on which is worse, potentially losing data or having
a client machine hang because the server is (perhaps temporarily)
unavailable. It depends totally on the specific application scenario.
To quote nfs(5):

quote
A  so-called  soft  timeout can cause silent data corruption in
certain cases. As such, use the soft option only when client
responsiveness is more important than data integrity.  Using NFS over
TCP or increasing the value of the retrans option  may  mitigate some
of the risks of using the soft option.
/quote

IOW there is no right answer to this.

poc

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Fedora 10

2009-01-07 Thread Sachin Murudkar
Hi all

I am using fedora 10 I need a client vpn to connect to my off systems can
any one guide me.



-- 
Thanks  Regards

Sachin Murudkar
Sr. Specialist Solutions

DUX Soft Pvt. Ltd
Complexity Simplified
Mobile  : +91 9819565900
Fax : +91 22 4057 2894
Board   : +91 22 4057 2800

Email : sac...@duxsoft.com
www.DUXSoft.com
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: Network Manager, Firefox and more on FC10

2009-01-07 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 10:20 PM, David R Wilson da...@wwns.com wrote:
 Firefox refuses to handle a bad certificate.  That is all well and good,
 until your dealing with a firewall that doesn't have one that is valid.
 I didn't find a way to get beyond the complaint about the certificate.
 I had to grab my laptop with FC9 to deal with that problem.  FC10 made
 doing anything with the https interface impossible.


It does not refuse to handle invalid certificates, it just pesters you
to accept them. You can do so permanently or just for the current
session, your choice. Look carefully at the popup dialog and click the
magic buttons.

poc

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Firefox 3.05 attempting to execute code on stack

2009-01-07 Thread Dave Feustel
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 03:14:39PM +, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
 Dave Feustel wrote:
 On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 02:54:06PM +, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
 Dave Feustel wrote:
 SELinux is reporting attempts by Firefox 3.05-1 to execute code
 on the stack on 32-bit f9. Time for a Firefox upgrade?

 Java plugin?

 Bryn.

 I have no idea. Maybe something to do with Flash.

 Possibly, although I doubt it - I've never seen a flash plugin that  
 attempted this but I have seen a number of JVMs do it (I assume it's  
 something to do with jit), mostly older ones iirc, so it's probably  
 worth checking for updates if you have a JRE installed that's not part  
 of the distribution.

 Bryn.

The offending file is a plugin called npviewer. Java was updated
yesterday. I think this was activated as a result of my attempts
to get Flash working with Firefox.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Firefox 3.05 attempting to execute code on stack

2009-01-07 Thread Dave Feustel
SELinux is reporting attempts by Firefox 3.05-1 to execute code
on the stack on 32-bit f9. Time for a Firefox upgrade?

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: FC10 Kernel PANIC ... Odd

2009-01-07 Thread Chris Snook

Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
	I did a clean FC10 install on a server today.  The installation 
itself went without a hitch, the system rebooted and came back up.  I 
logged in, admired the new graphics and then decided to run updates.


	When all the updates were done installing, I hit a restart only to 
be presented with a kernel PANIC.  It won't boot.  And at the time, I 
didn't have any means of capturing the message either.  It was very short, 
a one liner at the top of the screen, something with ld.so...yaddi yaddi 
yadda.


	Ok, this is why we have a rescue option, right?  So I booted from 
the DVD, went into rescue mode and looked at what kernel was installed.  
Much to my surprise, the latest kernel was installed (from the updates), 
however it was the .i586 version.  Odd, this machine has never run an 
i586 package that I can remember.  It's either an .i386 or an .i686, but 
never .i586.  Could that have been the problem?  Hmm, let's try ...


	I force installed the .i686 version of the kernel and kernel-devel 
packages and rebooted.  Tada!  It worked and came up beautifully.


	Inquiring minds want to know: why did the update install an .i586 
version (when an .i686 version was available)?  The machine has a dual 
core 3.4GHz Intel processor in it.  Through all of FC7, FC8, and FC9 I've 
never had problems upgrading the kernel and have never seen it install an 
.i586 ... till today.  And that failed miserably.


Should it have been able to boot the .i586?



I'd be curious to know if the i586 kernel boots with 'nosmp' on the kernel 
command line.  It's a kernel bug either way, but that would give us a good idea 
where to look.  It's also a yum bug that it got there at all in the first place.


-- Chris

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Firefox 3.05 attempting to execute code on stack

2009-01-07 Thread Bryn M. Reeves

Dave Feustel wrote:

On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 03:14:39PM +, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:

Dave Feustel wrote:

On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 02:54:06PM +, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:

Dave Feustel wrote:

SELinux is reporting attempts by Firefox 3.05-1 to execute code
on the stack on 32-bit f9. Time for a Firefox upgrade?


Java plugin?

Bryn.

I have no idea. Maybe something to do with Flash.
Possibly, although I doubt it - I've never seen a flash plugin that  
attempted this but I have seen a number of JVMs do it (I assume it's  
something to do with jit), mostly older ones iirc, so it's probably  
worth checking for updates if you have a JRE installed that's not part  
of the distribution.


Bryn.


The offending file is a plugin called npviewer. Java was updated
yesterday. I think this was activated as a result of my attempts
to get Flash working with Firefox.


Fedora wraps all browser plugins with nppluginwrapper now - you need to 
find out what plugin that instance of npviewer was executing in order to 
know who to blame.


Bryn.

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Netbook wifi, wlan0 and inet6 address (F10)

2009-01-07 Thread Jim

Anne Wilson wrote:

On Tuesday 06 January 2009 23:58:33 Steven I Usdansky wrote:
  

Wireless is working fine on my Aspire One in F10 (using GNOME and
connecting via NetworkManager). Kernel is 2.6.27.9-159.fc10.i686 if that
makes any difference. 



I have the same kernel.

  

~$ sudo lsmod | grep ath
dm_multipath   17164  0
ath5k 112520  0
mac80211  173668  1 ath5k
cfg80211   23816  2 ath5k,mac80211


My output is very different - which may be the result of my various efforts to 
get a driver running - whether ath5k or madwifi:


lsmod | grep ath
dm_multipath   17164  0
ath_rate_sample14848  1
ath_pci   162360  0
wlan  189748  4 wlan_scan_sta,ath_rate_sample,ath_pci
ath_hal   302176  3 ath_rate_sample,ath_pci

  

and, FWIW, my startup configuration:
/etc/rc3.d$ ls
K01dnsmasq   K75ntpdateS08ip6tables   S50bluetooth
K01livesys-late  K76openvpnS08iptablesS58ntpd
K01smartdK85mdmonitor  S12rsyslog S80sendmail
K05anacron   K87multipathd S13irqbalance  S85gpm
K05saslauthd K87restorecondS22messagebus  S90crond
K10psacctK89netplugd   S23wpa_supplicant  S90kerneloops
K15httpd K89rdisc  S25netfs   S90smolt
K25sshd  K90networkS26haldaemon   S95atd
K50netconsoleK95firstboot  S26lm_sensors  S96avahi-daemon
K73winbind   K99livesysS26udev-post   S98cups
K74nscd  S00microcode_ctl  S27NetworkManager  S99local
K75fuse  S06cpuspeed   S28portreserve



ls /etc/rc3.d
K01smartd  K73winbind  K90networkS14nfslock 
S55sshd
K05saslauthd   K73ypbind   K90shorewall  S15mdmonitor   
S58ntpd
K10psacct  K74lm_sensors   K91capi   S18rpcidmapd   
S80sendmail

K10zvbid   K74nscd K91wifiroamd  S19rpcgssd S85gpm
K20hddtemp K75fuse K95firstboot  S22messagebus  
S90crond
K20nfs K75ntpdate  S00microcode_ctl  S25netfs   
S90kerneloops
K24irdaK76openvpn  S06cpuspeed   S26acpid   
S90smolt

K36mysqld  K84btseed   S08ip6tables  S26haldaemon   S95atd
K45arpwatchK84bttrack  S08iptables   S26pcscd   
S96avahi-daemon
K50netconsole  K85racoon   S09isdn   S26udev-post   
S97yum-updatesd
K50snmpd   K87multipathd   S11auditd S27NetworkManager  
S98cups
K50snmptrapd   K87restorecond  S12rsyslogS28portreserve 
S99anacron
K50wpa_supplicant  K89netplugd S13irqbalance S28setroubleshoot  
S99dnsmasq
K69rpcsvcgssd  K89rdiscS13rpcbindS50bluetooth   
S99local


I don't see wpa_supplicant in there.

[r...@aao ~]# service network status
Configured devices:
lo eth0 wlan0
Currently active devices:
lo eth0 wifi0 wlan0
[r...@aao ~]# service NetworkManager status
NetworkManager (pid  2240) is running...

chkconfig --list network
network 0:off   1:off   2:off   3:off   4:off   5:off   6:off
[r...@aao ~]# chkconfig --list NetworkManager
NetworkManager  0:off   1:off   2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off

Is 'network' running?  I would have thought that 'Currently active devices:' 
means that it is.  If it is, why?  chkconfig says it isn't being activated.


Anne

  

If you are running the kernel-2.6.27 the correct driver will be ath5K_pci .
If your running kernel-2.6.26 you'll have to use the madwifi driver, but 
sure to blacklist the driver originally supplied by Fedora.


When kernel-2.6.27 came out it had the correct drivers fot the Atheros 
wireless card 2.6.26 did not.


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Help -- can't SSH into my box

2009-01-07 Thread Jim

John Aldrich wrote:

On Tuesday 06 January 2009, Stuart Sears wrote:
  

Not wishing :) to open a massive can of worms (even though this probably
will) but why do you hate it so much?


Precisely because it interferes with so many other things. If SELinux ever 
gets to the point where it plays nice with other things, or at least has 
a nice, easy ignore this app sort of thing (like antivirus/anti-spyware 
apps in Windoze) I might reconsider it. Until then, I'm going to disable it 
whenever possible.


I installed fail2ban and SELinux immediately threw up massive errors. I 
coudl understand that much better if it were some 3rd-party app, but 
something out of the default Fedora repos should be able to run w/o 
generating complaints from a security system. Fail2ban, especially, should 
be allowed to run w/o issue, due to the very nature of it.


  

I installed fail2ban on a FC8 x86_64 box and selinux didn't cry one bit.
You did get fail2ban off the Fedora repos ?

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: ftp question

2009-01-07 Thread Mark Haney
adrian kok wrote:
 Hi
 
 When I change this file /etc/passwd
 
 from /home/userA to /ftp/userA
 
 eg:
 userA:x:502:502::/ftp/userA:/bin/bash
 
 After change this passwd file, I can't logon as ftp
 
 but ssh is fine
 
 Thank you
 
 
 Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com 
 

Are you getting any error messages in the ftp logs files?  What are
they?  The log files (including syslog) are your friends in this case.
Without seeing what the logs say, I'm not sure we can help debug.  But,
if I had my guess, it could be that the /ftp/UserA directory doesn't
exist and so ftpd can't change to it.


-- 
Frustra laborant quotquot se calculationibus fatigant pro inventione
quadraturae circuli

Mark Haney
Sr. Systems Administrator
ERC Broadband
(828) 350-2415

Call (866) ERC-7110 for after hours support

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Fedora 10

2009-01-07 Thread Kevin Kempter
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 08:20:12 Sachin Murudkar wrote:
 Hi all

 I am using fedora 10 I need a client vpn to connect to my off systems can
 any one guide me.

I have yet to be able to get a VPN client working in Fedora 10 - for now I'm 
running CentOS inside of vmware workstation since the cisco vpn client for 
Linux compiles fine in CentOS 

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


disabling selinux entirely

2009-01-07 Thread John Aldrich
I thought that by setting selinux to disabled in the config file, I 
wouldn't be bothered by it's alerts any more. How do I stop SELinux from 
running, period? I don't want any alerts from SELinux regarding stuff I'm 
trying to install.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: HiJacking Threads Was: hostapd for Fedora 10

2009-01-07 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
 I presume that's because Gmane is a news posting service. Every
 genuine email client I know of supports In-Reply-To. You'll notice
 that posts on this list from Gmane users are usually out of their
 proper threads. Now you know why. Same thing happens with Yahoo
 apparently. Solution: avoid broken clients.

 Like yours? The mails I'm sending with KNode (an NNTP client) through GMane
 thread fine in the official archives at redhat.com (as well as obviously in
 KNode itself).

(I've only just noticed your post Kevin, sorry.)

I'm using the Gmail web interface for this list, basically as an
experiment. If it's not threading properly, I'll consider changing
(needless to say, it *does* thread properly on Gmail :-)

However I see that Gmail does add the Message-ID and In-Reply-To
headers, so are you sure the problem is at my end?

poc

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: disabling selinux entirely

2009-01-07 Thread Tom Horsley
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 10:23:23 -0500
John Aldrich wrote:

 I thought that by setting selinux to disabled in the config file, I 
 wouldn't be bothered by it's alerts any more. How do I stop SELinux from 
 running, period?

Did you reboot after doing that?

As a belt  suspenders kind of thing, I also set selinux=0 in the
kernel options in grub.conf.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: ftp question

2009-01-07 Thread Jake Walters

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Are you using vsftpd with virtual users on the server? If so make sure 
you have the guest_user and no_priv option turned on in 
/etc/vsftpd/vsftpd.conf. Something like;


nopriv_user=vsftpd
chroot_local_user=YES
guest_enable=YES
guest_username=vsftpd
local_root=/var/ftp/$USER

adrian kok wrote:

| Hi
|
| When I change this file /etc/passwd
|
| from /home/userA to /ftp/userA
|
| eg:
| userA:x:502:502::/ftp/userA:/bin/bash
|
| After change this passwd file, I can't logon as ftp
|
| but ssh is fine
|
| Thank you
|
|
| Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com



- --
Jake Walters
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJZM+npjWgHK67SxERAi/3AKDGJCzh9s6/lhVMPVnzpQDbrVB9BgCfY9Pr
JKzDfHM/RVl915RATCCJni0=
=k+X7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: disabling selinux entirely

2009-01-07 Thread Stephen Smalley
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 10:23 -0500, John Aldrich wrote:
 I thought that by setting selinux to disabled in the config file, I 
 wouldn't be bothered by it's alerts any more. How do I stop SELinux from 
 running, period? I don't want any alerts from SELinux regarding stuff I'm 
 trying to install.

SELINUX=disabled in /etc/selinux/config should have done the trick for
you.  Can you provide the output of:
$ cat /etc/selinux/config
$ dmesg | grep SELinux:

-- 
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: disabling selinux entirely

2009-01-07 Thread Stephen Smalley
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 10:45 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
 On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 10:23:23 -0500
 John Aldrich wrote:
 
  I thought that by setting selinux to disabled in the config file, I 
  wouldn't be bothered by it's alerts any more. How do I stop SELinux from 
  running, period?
 
 Did you reboot after doing that?
 
 As a belt  suspenders kind of thing, I also set selinux=0 in the
 kernel options in grub.conf.

Either one is supposed to work, so you shouldn't need both.

-- 
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Help -- can't SSH into my box

2009-01-07 Thread Tim
John Aldrich:
 From what I've read, it appeared that there was no way to *not* have
 selinux and that the best you could do was to have it run in
 permissive mode. I'll have to give that a shot.

Tim:
 Incorrect.  Whilst it's a recompile-everything-yourself customisation
 nightmare to rip it out of a system, you can disable it.

Chris Snook:
 Not so.  You can completely disable it with selinux=0 on the kernel command 
 line.

I think you need to read that again, all of it.  Because your not so
comment is completely out of place in replying to me.

John incorrectly reckoned it couldn't actually be disabled and had
correctly worked out that it can't be removed.  I said that you can't
remove it, short of making a completely custom system, but you *can*
disable it.

-- 
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.9-73.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Network Manager, Firefox and more on FC10

2009-01-07 Thread David R. Wilson
Thanks,

I didn't go looking for grub documentation, that is helpful.

Since some of the boxes I administer are servers and dedicated to one
task or another I have mostly defeated NetworkManager.  I understand the
logic for it, I just find it evil more often than not.  Modifying
startup scripts has been easier for me.


On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 21:27 -0700, Craig White wrote:
 On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 20:50 -0600, David R Wilson wrote:
  Hello fellows,
  
  My .02 worth on several subjects.  
  
  Network Manager since FC8 has been causing more grief to me than it is
  worth.  It looks like it needs to look at
  the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ files for eth0 and if it is there
  don't screw things up (or at least prompt before destruction). 
 
 NetworkManager intends to give 'userland' control over network
 connections whether they are wired, wireless, VPN, etc. Users that are
 accustomed to switching to superuser to manipulate things aren't likely
 to appreciate the value of this whereas network administrators know that
 these things are essential as they don't want users to have super user
 powers.
 
  The startup screen with the travelling bars near the bottom of the
  screen is a waste of time.  There is a reason I want to see what the box
  is doing, and prefer the FC9 behavior.  With FC9 I could hit a key and
  watch for problems.  I didn't find any documentation on how to change
  that to the FC9 behavior.
 
 turn it off...
 
 edit /boot/grub/grub.conf and remove rhgb and quiet from the kernel boot
 parameters
 
  Firefox refuses to handle a bad certificate.  That is all well and good,
  until your dealing with a firewall that doesn't have one that is valid.
  I didn't find a way to get beyond the complaint about the certificate.
  I had to grab my laptop with FC9 to deal with that problem.  FC10 made
  doing anything with the https interface impossible.
 
 Firefox has made this a feature across the board and so FF 3 whether on
 Windows, Linux or Macintosh will always throw this safety alert when
 presented with certificates that are signed by untrusted authorities.
 
 Most people actually read their options and figure this out. This isn't
 a Fedora issue at all. 

True.  I should have looked for a Firefox list.  I figured some of those
involved in that project were lurking here.



 Since you are struggling with the whole concept, see this...
 
 http://blog.ivanristic.com/2008/04/firefox-3-ssl-i.html
 
 Craig
 

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: disabling selinux entirely

2009-01-07 Thread John Aldrich
On Wednesday 07 January 2009, Stephen Smalley wrote:
 On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 10:23 -0500, John Aldrich wrote:
  I thought that by setting selinux to disabled in the config file, I
  wouldn't be bothered by it's alerts any more. How do I stop SELinux
  from running, period? I don't want any alerts from SELinux regarding
  stuff I'm trying to install.

 SELINUX=disabled in /etc/selinux/config should have done the trick for
 you.  Can you provide the output of:
 $ cat /etc/selinux/config
 $ dmesg | grep SELinux:

Well, no I have not rebooted... Is this one of those things like a new 
kernel where you *have* to reboot? Really don't want to do that... maybe I 
can do it tonight when I'm actually at home to watch it.. (yeah... I'm 
paranoid! so sue me! G)


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: disabling selinux entirely

2009-01-07 Thread John Aldrich
On Wednesday 07 January 2009, Stephen Smalley wrote:
 On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 10:23 -0500, John Aldrich wrote:
  I thought that by setting selinux to disabled in the config file, I
  wouldn't be bothered by it's alerts any more. How do I stop SELinux
  from running, period? I don't want any alerts from SELinux regarding
  stuff I'm trying to install.

 SELINUX=disabled in /etc/selinux/config should have done the trick for
 you.  Can you provide the output of:
 $ cat /etc/selinux/config
 $ dmesg | grep SELinux:

[j...@slave1 ~]$ cat /etc/selinux/config
# This file controls the state of SELinux on the system.
# SELINUX= can take one of these three values:
#   enforcing - SELinux security policy is enforced.
#   permissive - SELinux prints warnings instead of enforcing.
#   disabled - SELinux is fully disabled.
SELINUX=disabled
# SELINUXTYPE= type of policy in use. Possible values are:
#   targeted - Only targeted network daemons are protected.
#   strict - Full SELinux protection.
SELINUXTYPE=targeted

[j...@slave1 ~]$ dmesg | grep selinux
SELinux: initialized (dev selinuxfs, type selinuxfs), uses genfs_contexts

Note that I have not rebooted yet, if that's necessary.



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Network Manager, Firefox and more on FC10

2009-01-07 Thread David R. Wilson
I looked for a way to make an exception.  I didn't find it.
With FC9 I had that as an option.  This was immediately after a yum
update.

Dave

On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 10:50 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
 On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 10:20 PM, David R Wilson da...@wwns.com wrote:
  Firefox refuses to handle a bad certificate.  That is all well and good,
  until your dealing with a firewall that doesn't have one that is valid.
  I didn't find a way to get beyond the complaint about the certificate.
  I had to grab my laptop with FC9 to deal with that problem.  FC10 made
  doing anything with the https interface impossible.
 
 
 It does not refuse to handle invalid certificates, it just pesters you
 to accept them. You can do so permanently or just for the current
 session, your choice. Look carefully at the popup dialog and click the
 magic buttons.
 
 poc
 

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Netbook wifi, wlan0 and inet6 address (F10)

2009-01-07 Thread Anne Wilson
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 15:09:01 Steven I Usdansky wrote:
 I'm running wpa_supplicant, but right now I'm on an unprotected network.
 network is not running:

 ~# service network status
 Configured devices:
 lo eth0 pan0 wlan0
 Currently active devices:
 lo eth0 wmaster0 wlan0

OK - that looks as though mine is ok, then.

 ~# chkconfig --list network
 network   0:off   1:off   2:off   3:off   4:off   5:off   6:off
 ~# chkconfig --list NetworkManager
 NetworkManager0:off   1:off   2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off

As does that.

 Looks like you're using the madwifi driver. I haven't used it on my AA1 in
 Fedora as the ath5k driver in the newer kernels have been working for me.
 Nothing atheros-related is blacklisted in /etc/modprobe.d;
 /etc.modprobe.conf is empty.

I've removed ndiswrapper and madwifi, leaving only the kernel driver.  The 
blacklists for ath5k and ath5k-pci have disappeared.  I've restarted 
NetworkManager, but still no joy.




 /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts# cat ifcfg-wlan0
 # Atheros Communications Inc. AR242x 802.11abg Wireless PCI Express Adapter
 DEVICE=wlan0
 HWADDR=00:22:69:92:f3:a3

Those lines match, too.

 /etc/sysconfig# cat network
 NETWORKING=yes
 HOSTNAME=Labradorite

I have those plus

NETWORKING_IPV6=no
GATEWAY=192.168.0.1


 Nothing particularly interesting that I can see in sysconfig, but I've
 included it just in case.

Anne


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

  1   2   3   >