[Fwd: bugzilla.redhat.com, hardware.redhat.com Planned Outage | Jan 09 2009 - 9:00 PM EST]
Original Message Subject: bugzilla.redhat.com, hardware.redhat.com Planned Outage | Jan 09 2009 - 9:00 PM EST Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 11:18:46 -0500 From: Meethune Bhowmick O U T A G E R E Q U E S T F O R M = Severity: Severity Four (Low)/CSR Scheduled Date: Jan 09 2009 Scheduled Time: 9:00 PM EST Estimated Time Required: 1 hour Performed By: Engineering Operations People/Groups Impacted: Bugzilla Users Site/Services Affected: bugzilla.redhat.com, hardware.redhat.com Impact: Bugzilla will be temporarily offline while we run updates. Description: Running package updates. Hosts will be rebooted. Signoff: msch...@redhat.com -- fedora-announce-list mailing list fedora-announce-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-announce-list
Fedora Unity F9 20081217 respins
The Fedora Unity Project is proud to announce the release of new ISO Re-Spins of Fedora 9. These Re-Spin ISOs are based on the officially released Fedora 9 installation media and include all updates released as of December 17th, 2008. The ISO images are available for i386, x86_64 architectures via Jigdo and Torrent starting Wednesday January 7th, 2008. Go to http://spins.fedoraunity.org/spins to get the bits! DVD Media Only Due to known problems in comps, this is a DVD Only Re-spin. The CD version would have required all 6 to 7 discs to install. Full Installation Problems if Language Support Groups Selected Selecting some language groups will cause file conflict errors, such as reported and explained in #465715 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465715 Thanks to We would like to give a special thanks to the following for testing this Re-Spin: - zcatJason Farrell - vwbusguy- Scott Williams - Southern_Gentleman Ben Williams - kanarip Jeroen van Meeuwen - _drj2 Dennis Johnson Testing Results A full test matrix can be found at our Test Matrix http://spins.fedoraunity.org/Members/Southern_Gentleman/f9-20081217-testmatrix A full list of bugs, packages and changelogs that have been updated in this Re-Spin can be reviewed on http://spins.fedoraunity.org/changelogs/20081217// http://spins.fedoraunity.org/changelogs/20081217/ Previous Re-Spin (20081004) will expire Due to limited resources, this spin will immediately obsolete 20080718, which will be deleted from our mirrors in the next few days. Fedora Unity has taken up the Re-Spin task to provide the community with the chance to install Fedora with recent updates already included. These updates might otherwise comprise more than 2.05GiB of downloads for a full install. This is a community project, for and by the community. You can contribute to the community by joining our test process. Go to http://spins.fedoraunity.org/spins to get the bits! Assistance Needed If you are interested in helping with the testing or mirroring efforts, please contact the Fedora Unity team. Contact information is available at http://fedoraunity.org/ or the #fedora-unity channel on the Freenode IRC Network (irc.freenode.net). To report bugs in the Re-Spins please use http://bugs.fedoraunity.org/ -- Ben Williams Window-Linux Specialist Mathematics Department-Virginia Tech 561E McBryde Hall 540 231-2739 -- fedora-announce-list mailing list fedora-announce-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-announce-list
Unsigned nautilus packages in latest F10 updates
Due to an as of yet not fully understood bug, unsigned nautilus packages slipped into the last Fedora 10 updates push. I have a new updates push running with signed versions of those packages which should finish in the next 20 minutes or so. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused and will continue to investigate the root cause. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-announce-list mailing list fedora-announce-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-announce-list
Re: Fedora-Logo in 3D
Hi Gerold https://kermit.homelinux.net/backgrounds/ this link is my work too ;) Temp work of fedora : http://molaora.com/index.php/photos/album/8.html Fedora gallery: http://molaora.com/index.php/photos/album/4.html In deviantart : http://mola-mp.deviantart.com/gallery/#Fedora I have submit source of blender file in this link : http://molaora.com/index.php/blog/show/Blender-source-of-Fedora-logo-.html On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 14:10 +0100, Gerold Kassube wrote: I'm looking for a artwork like this in https://kermit.homelinux.net/backgrounds/ for having a good master for creating a model But my friend needs it plane and not with angles Thanks for all of your help Gerold Am Montag, den 05.01.2009, 14:40 +0200 schrieb Nicu Buculei: Gerold Kassube wrote: Hi all, Second, I'm searching for the Fedora Logo in 3D, does anybody has such a artwork? I thought I saw such a work many month (years?) before done by someone of the Art Team. Something like this? http://www.isity.net/icFedora/060419/TakeTwoA1.jpg Background is, that I found a stone cutter who will make a model for me/us, and we want to do a bronze model for fairs. ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
RE: * Proposed Guideline Changes - Bitmap Post-processing in Echo Icons
From: fedora-art-list-requ...@redhat.com Subject: Fedora-art-list Digest, Vol 34, Issue 6 To: fedora-art-list@redhat.com Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 12:00:06 -0500 Send Fedora-art-list mailing list submissions to fedora-art-list@redhat.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to fedora-art-list-requ...@redhat.com You can reach the person managing the list at fedora-art-list-ow...@redhat.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of Fedora-art-list digest... Today's Topics: 1. Echo Monthly News Issue 4-5, November - December 2008 (Martin Sourada) 2. Re: Echo Monthly News Issue 4-5, November - December 2008 (Martin Sourada) -- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:15:08 +0100 From: Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com Subject: Echo Monthly News Issue 4-5, November - December 2008 To: Discussions about the artwork included with Fedora, including icons, themes, and wallpapers. fedora-art-list@redhat.com, fedora-announce-l...@redhat.com fedora-announce-l...@redhat.com Message-ID: 1231280108.19371.11.ca...@pc-notebook Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi, We've just published latest Echo Monthly News Issue [1]. Due too lack of enough content, it is joint of November's and December's happenings. The topics are: * Echo Perspective - Proposed Designs * Proposed Guideline Changes - Bitmap Post-processing in Echo Icons Regards, The Echo Team -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-art-list/attachments/20090106/7108b2d6/attachment.bin -- Message: 2 Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:48:16 +0100 From: Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Echo Monthly News Issue 4-5, November - December 2008 To: Discussions about the artwork included with Fedora, including icons, themes, and wallpapers. fedora-art-list@redhat.com Cc: fedora-announce-l...@redhat.com fedora-announce-l...@redhat.com Message-ID: 1231282096.19371.13.ca...@pc-notebook Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 23:15 +0100, Martin Sourada wrote: Hi, We've just published latest Echo Monthly News Issue [1]. Due too lack of enough content, it is joint of November's and December's happenings. The topics are: * Echo Perspective - Proposed Designs * Proposed Guideline Changes - Bitmap Post-processing in Echo Icons Regards, The Echo Team Sorry for the second mail, I forgot to actually add the reference. [1] https://fedorahosted.org/echo-icon-theme/wiki/MonthlyNews/Issue4-5 -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-art-list/attachments/20090106/fa359761/attachment.bin -- ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list End of Fedora-art-list Digest, Vol 34, Issue 6 ** _ Llévate Messenger en el móvil a todas partes ¡Conéctate! http://www.microsoft.com/spain/windowsmobile/messenger/default.mspx ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: Echo Monthly News Issue 4-5, November - December 2008
Quoting Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com: Sorry for the second mail, I forgot to actually add the reference. [1] https://fedorahosted.org/echo-icon-theme/wiki/MonthlyNews/Issue4-5 News submitted on Fedora Forum [1] Luya [1]http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=210042 ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
I need a freemedia web banner.
Like this: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Image:Artwork_ArtTeamProjects_WikiDesign_ArtTeamN1.png for the top banner of https://fedorahosted.org/freemedia/ Is there any existing design? -- Regards, Susmit. = ssh 0x86DD170A http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/user:susmit = ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: Koji feature proposals
Mike Bonnet wrote: On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 21:51 +0100, Oliver Falk wrote: Hi Mike! Mike Bonnet schrieb: I've just created tickets for a few Koji features that I've been wanting to implement for a while (as well as updated an old one), and I'm planning to devote some time to in the near future. If you have any comments on these features feel free to post to the tickets, or talk to me at FUDCon this weekend. Just figured people might want to see the direction that Koji is headed. The future is now! :) [ ... ] drop the rpmfiles and rpmdeps tables: https://fedorahosted.org/koji/ticket/124 -1 Only if you provide the same functionality using another approach :-) Yes, the plan is to query the information directly from the rpms rather than from the database. You'll likely need to cache the list of files somewhere. Just to mention it: Using yum metadata isn't enough, as you'll only query the latest pkgs... The content on the rpminfo page in the web UI should not change at all from the user perspective. Good. *I* do use it quite often; Find out which file belongs to which pkg(s). However, this was quite slow and now doesn't even seem to work in koji.fpo. :-( Hmmm, it should be. In what way is it not working? Query for Files (eg. /bin/ls): Mod_python error: PythonHandler mod_python.publisher Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/mod_python/apache.py, line 299, in HandlerDispatch result = object(req) File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/mod_python/publisher.py, line 213, in handler published = publish_object(req, object) File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/mod_python/publisher.py, line 412, in publish_object return publish_object(req,util.apply_fs_data(object, req.form, req=req)) File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/mod_python/util.py, line 439, in apply_fs_data return object(**args) File /usr/share/koji-web/scripts/index.py, line 1680, in search start=start, dataName='results', prefix='result', order=order) File /usr/share/koji-web/lib/kojiweb/util.py, line 123, in paginateMethod totalRows = getattr(server, methodName)(*args, **kw) File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/koji/__init__.py, line 1133, in __call__ return self.__func(self.__name,args,opts) File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/koji/__init__.py, line 1378, in _callMethod raise err Fault: noarch subpackage support: https://fedorahosted.org/koji/ticket/125 Duh? We do have already (at least one) packages that build arch-specific and noarch pkgs - kernel or do we use some *hack* in the kernel.spec? We use a hack in the kernel specfile and in the build system. The noarch subpackage support in rpm is much more generic and flexible, and we need to support it without build system hacks. OK. I wasn't quite sure how it's working now... However, now that I know I do understand. And regarding your point: '... different arches build noarch subpackage with different contents'. Well, then it's definitly not *noarch*, is't it? :-) True, but it's still possible, and we may need to check for this case and handle is appropriately (possibly by failing the build). Yet another post install section processing script (YAPISPS) :-) And yes, if it's not really noarch, it should fail. But shouldn't rpm itself check that? I mean, if someone writes a script to check that it should possibly go directly into rpm upstream sources... -of -- Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
Re: Koji feature proposals
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: OF == Oliver Falk oli...@linux-kernel.at writes: OF And regarding your point: '... different arches build noarch OF subpackage with different contents'. Well, then it's definitly not OF *noarch*, is't it? :-) It is quite possible for the contents to differ by, say, date, or by timestamps being included in plain text output. Why would that render the output arch-specific? We where talking about *real* content... :-) What I could imaging to happen is something like this (just an example, but it should make my point clear): i386: somescript.sh #!/usr/libexec/blabla/i386-bla-bla/bla/binary ... x86_64: somescript.sh #!/usr/libexec/blabla/x86_64-bla-bla/bla/binary ... alpha: somescript.sh #!/usr/libexec/blabla/alpha-bla-bla/bla/binary ... It's hard to check something like this, isn't it? Well, as long as it's only the interpreter line at the beginning it might be simple, but But don't worry, since we do have a few arches already, such bugs should be found quite fast and maybe we can add additional checks later :-) -of -- Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
Re: Koji feature proposals
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 09:08 +0100, Oliver Falk wrote: Yet another post install section processing script (YAPISPS) :-) And yes, if it's not really noarch, it should fail. But shouldn't rpm itself check that? I mean, if someone writes a script to check that it should possibly go directly into rpm upstream sources... rpm itself only ever builds for one target at a time, so a script to check to see if what was produced from one target build is different from another target build doesn't necessarily make sense in rpm sources, at least not something ran automated. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
Re: Koji feature proposals
Jesse Keating wrote: On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 09:08 +0100, Oliver Falk wrote: Yet another post install section processing script (YAPISPS) :-) And yes, if it's not really noarch, it should fail. But shouldn't rpm itself check that? I mean, if someone writes a script to check that it should possibly go directly into rpm upstream sources... rpm itself only ever builds for one target at a time, so a script to check to see if what was produced from one target build is different from another target build doesn't necessarily make sense in rpm sources, at least not something ran automated. OKOK. I thought rpmbuild will automagically produce arch-specific and noarch packages in 'one step'... -of -- Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
Re: Koji feature proposals
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 17:23 +0100, Oliver Falk wrote: OKOK. I thought rpmbuild will automagically produce arch-specific and noarch packages in 'one step'... It will, for one arch. You do a rpmbuild --rebuild foo (on x86_64) and it'll spit out x86_64 binary packages and potentially a noarch package. What we care about is doing the same command on i386 and generating i386 packages and a noarch package, having the i386 produced noarch package match the x86_64 produced noarch package. To the best of my knowledge there is no way to convince rpmbuild to produce both i386 /and/ x86_64 packages in the same run. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
[PATCH/mock] Fix git log command used for ChangeLog and AUTHORS
The git-* commands are not in the PATH by default with git = 1.6.0. Signed-off-by: Todd Zullinger t...@pobox.com --- Makefile.am |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am index aefcad8..4fe1e7d 100644 --- a/Makefile.am +++ b/Makefile.am @@ -58,10 +58,10 @@ CLEANFILES += py/*.pyc py/mock/*.pyc py/mock/plugins/*.pyc dist: ChangeLog AUTHORS ChangeLog: - (GIT_DIR=.git git-log .changelog.tmp mv .changelog.tmp ChangeLog; rm -f .changelog.tmp) || (touch ChangeLog; echo 'git directory not found: installing possibly empty changelog.' 2) + (GIT_DIR=.git git log .changelog.tmp mv .changelog.tmp ChangeLog; rm -f .changelog.tmp) || (touch ChangeLog; echo 'git directory not found: installing possibly empty changelog.' 2) AUTHORS: - (GIT_DIR=.git git-log | grep ^Author | sort |uniq .authors.tmp mv .authors.tmp AUTHORS; rm -f .authors.tmp) || (touch AUTHORS; echo 'git directory not found: installing possibly empty AUTHORS.' 2) + (GIT_DIR=.git git log | grep ^Author | sort |uniq .authors.tmp mv .authors.tmp AUTHORS; rm -f .authors.tmp) || (touch AUTHORS; echo 'git directory not found: installing possibly empty AUTHORS.' 2) REPLACE_VARS_ON_INSTALL=$(sbindir)/mock.py install-exec-hook: -- 1.6.1 -- ToddOpenPGP - KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~ Intaxication (n.) Euphoria at getting a tax refund, which lasts until you realize it was your money to start with. -- Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
Re: Koji feature proposals
Jesse Keating wrote: On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 17:23 +0100, Oliver Falk wrote: OKOK. I thought rpmbuild will automagically produce arch-specific and noarch packages in 'one step'... It will, for one arch. You do a rpmbuild --rebuild foo (on x86_64) and it'll spit out x86_64 binary packages and potentially a noarch package. What we care about is doing the same command on i386 and generating i386 packages and a noarch package, having the i386 produced noarch package match the x86_64 produced noarch package. To the best of my knowledge there is no way to convince rpmbuild to produce both i386 /and/ x86_64 packages in the same run. Alright. I got it now - I think :-) So a build in koji will produce a noarch package for every arch. And then you need to decide which noarch package to take and how to find out if there are (arch specific) differences in those noarch's, right? -of -- Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
[Bug 477440] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477440 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-07 04:16:58 EDT --- php-ZendFramework-1.7.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-ZendFramework'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0094 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mail...@l | |aposte.net) | --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-07 04:23:27 EDT --- Those other pages that were approved yesterday by FPC (minutes not posted yet) may also be relevant for VLGothic http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_(2008-12-21) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2008-12-22) You probably want to perform the naming changes at the same time. To change a srpm naming, the current procedure is to orphan the old package in rawhide, and post a review request with the new name (I'll approve it as a matter of course if you do so) This will be discussed this evening by FESCO, you may want to add some input here http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/RenamingPackages As for the upgrade path, you have two choices: 1. If there is a clear mapping between the old packages and the new packages, use obsoletes inside the packages 2. If there is not use a compat package to garbage collect the old packages as has been done for dejavu in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477375] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477375 Roy Rankin rran...@ihug.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477406] kdeedu: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477406 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||478662 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu Blocks||477406 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/devel dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 dustin-dustismo-fonts-roman-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sour
Author: slankes
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv772
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf
dustin-dustismo-fonts-roman-fontconfig.conf
dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec
Log Message:
initial import
--- NEW FILE dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf ---
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM ../fonts.dtd
fontconfig
alias
familysans-serif/family
prefer
familyDustismo/family
/prefer
/alias
alias
familyDustismo/family
default
familysans-serif/family
/default
/alias
/fontconfig
--- NEW FILE dustin-dustismo-fonts-roman-fontconfig.conf ---
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM ../fonts.dtd
fontconfig
alias
familyserif/family
prefer
familyDustismo/family
/prefer
/alias
alias
familyDustismo/family
default
familyserif/family
/default
/alias
/fontconfig
--- NEW FILE dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec ---
%define fontname dustin-dustismo
%define fontconf 63-%{fontname}
%define common_desc General purpose fonts by Dustin Norlander available in \
serif and sans-serif versions. The fonts cover all European Latin characters.
Name: %{fontname}-fonts
Version: 20030318
Release: 2%{?dist}
Summary: General purpose sans-serif font with bold, italic and
bold-italic variations
Group: User Interface/X
License: GPLv2+
URL: http://www.dustismo.com
# Actual download URL
#URL:
http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/t/ttf-dustin/ttf-dustin_20030517.orig.tar.gz
Source0: Dustismo.zip
Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf
Source2: %{name}-roman-fontconfig.conf
BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XX)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel
%description
%common_desc
%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf}.conf dustismo_bold_italic.ttf dustismo_bold.ttf
dustismo_italic.ttf Dustismo.ttf
%package common
Summary: Common files for %{name}
Group: User Interface/X
Requires: fontpackages-filesystem
%description common
%common_desc
This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages.
%package roman
Summary: General purpose serif font
Group: User Interface/X
Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
%description roman
%common_desc
General purpose serif font with bold, italic and bold-italic variations
%_font_pkg -n roman -f %{fontconf}-roman.conf Dustismo_Roman_Bold.ttf
Dustismo_Roman.ttf Dustismo_Roman_Italic_Bold.ttf Dustismo_Roman_Italic.ttf
%prep
%setup -q -c %{name}
sed -i 's/\r//' license.txt
%build
%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1}
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2}
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-roman.conf
for fontconf in %{fontconf}.conf %{fontconf}-roman.conf ; do
ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fontconf
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fontconf
done
%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%files common
%defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
%doc license.txt
%dir %{_fontdir}
%changelog
* Wed Dec 07 2009 Sven Lankes s...@lank.es - 20030318-2
- Change package-name to dustin-dustistmo-fonts
* Sun Dec 04 2009 Sven Lankes s...@lank.es - 20030318-1
- Use newer debian-source as source
- Convert to -multi spec
* Wed Dec 31 2008 Sven Lankes s...@lank.es - 20030207-1
- Initial packaging
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore 7 Jan 2009 00:04:31 - 1.1
+++ .cvsignore 7 Jan 2009 19:39:53 - 1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+Dustismo.zip
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources 7 Jan 2009 00:04:31 - 1.1
+++ sources 7 Jan 2009 19:39:53 - 1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+de74f82082b7dba21e457b8bb32b88a5 Dustismo.zip
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-10 dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 dustin-dustismo-fonts-roman-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1
Author: slankes
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2891/F-10
Added Files:
dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf
dustin-dustismo-fonts-roman-fontconfig.conf
dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec
Log Message:
initial import
--- NEW FILE dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf ---
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM ../fonts.dtd
fontconfig
alias
familysans-serif/family
prefer
familyDustismo/family
/prefer
/alias
alias
familyDustismo/family
default
familysans-serif/family
/default
/alias
/fontconfig
--- NEW FILE dustin-dustismo-fonts-roman-fontconfig.conf ---
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM ../fonts.dtd
fontconfig
alias
familyserif/family
prefer
familyDustismo/family
/prefer
/alias
alias
familyDustismo/family
default
familyserif/family
/default
/alias
/fontconfig
--- NEW FILE dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec ---
%define fontname dustin-dustismo
%define fontconf 63-%{fontname}
%define common_desc General purpose fonts by Dustin Norlander available in \
serif and sans-serif versions. The fonts cover all European Latin characters.
Name: %{fontname}-fonts
Version: 20030318
Release: 2%{?dist}
Summary: General purpose sans-serif font with bold, italic and
bold-italic variations
Group: User Interface/X
License: GPLv2+
URL: http://www.dustismo.com
# Actual download URL
#URL:
http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/t/ttf-dustin/ttf-dustin_20030517.orig.tar.gz
Source0: Dustismo.zip
Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf
Source2: %{name}-roman-fontconfig.conf
BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XX)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel
%description
%common_desc
%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf}.conf dustismo_bold_italic.ttf dustismo_bold.ttf
dustismo_italic.ttf Dustismo.ttf
%package common
Summary: Common files for %{name}
Group: User Interface/X
Requires: fontpackages-filesystem
%description common
%common_desc
This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages.
%package roman
Summary: General purpose serif font
Group: User Interface/X
Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
%description roman
%common_desc
General purpose serif font with bold, italic and bold-italic variations
%_font_pkg -n roman -f %{fontconf}-roman.conf Dustismo_Roman_Bold.ttf
Dustismo_Roman.ttf Dustismo_Roman_Italic_Bold.ttf Dustismo_Roman_Italic.ttf
%prep
%setup -q -c %{name}
sed -i 's/\r//' license.txt
%build
%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1}
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2}
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-roman.conf
for fontconf in %{fontconf}.conf %{fontconf}-roman.conf ; do
ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fontconf
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fontconf
done
%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%files common
%defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
%doc license.txt
%dir %{_fontdir}
%changelog
* Wed Dec 07 2009 Sven Lankes s...@lank.es - 20030318-2
- Change package-name to dustin-dustistmo-fonts
* Sun Dec 04 2009 Sven Lankes s...@lank.es - 20030318-1
- Use newer debian-source as source
- Convert to -multi spec
* Wed Dec 31 2008 Sven Lankes s...@lank.es - 20030207-1
- Initial packaging
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-9 dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 dustin-dustismo-fonts-roman-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1
Author: slankes
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-9
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2891/F-9
Added Files:
dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf
dustin-dustismo-fonts-roman-fontconfig.conf
dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec
Log Message:
initial import
--- NEW FILE dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf ---
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM ../fonts.dtd
fontconfig
alias
familysans-serif/family
prefer
familyDustismo/family
/prefer
/alias
alias
familyDustismo/family
default
familysans-serif/family
/default
/alias
/fontconfig
--- NEW FILE dustin-dustismo-fonts-roman-fontconfig.conf ---
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM ../fonts.dtd
fontconfig
alias
familyserif/family
prefer
familyDustismo/family
/prefer
/alias
alias
familyDustismo/family
default
familyserif/family
/default
/alias
/fontconfig
--- NEW FILE dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec ---
%define fontname dustin-dustismo
%define fontconf 63-%{fontname}
%define common_desc General purpose fonts by Dustin Norlander available in \
serif and sans-serif versions. The fonts cover all European Latin characters.
Name: %{fontname}-fonts
Version: 20030318
Release: 2%{?dist}
Summary: General purpose sans-serif font with bold, italic and
bold-italic variations
Group: User Interface/X
License: GPLv2+
URL: http://www.dustismo.com
# Actual download URL
#URL:
http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/t/ttf-dustin/ttf-dustin_20030517.orig.tar.gz
Source0: Dustismo.zip
Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf
Source2: %{name}-roman-fontconfig.conf
BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XX)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel
%description
%common_desc
%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf}.conf dustismo_bold_italic.ttf dustismo_bold.ttf
dustismo_italic.ttf Dustismo.ttf
%package common
Summary: Common files for %{name}
Group: User Interface/X
Requires: fontpackages-filesystem
%description common
%common_desc
This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages.
%package roman
Summary: General purpose serif font
Group: User Interface/X
Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
%description roman
%common_desc
General purpose serif font with bold, italic and bold-italic variations
%_font_pkg -n roman -f %{fontconf}-roman.conf Dustismo_Roman_Bold.ttf
Dustismo_Roman.ttf Dustismo_Roman_Italic_Bold.ttf Dustismo_Roman_Italic.ttf
%prep
%setup -q -c %{name}
sed -i 's/\r//' license.txt
%build
%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1}
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2}
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-roman.conf
for fontconf in %{fontconf}.conf %{fontconf}-roman.conf ; do
ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fontconf
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fontconf
done
%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%files common
%defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
%doc license.txt
%dir %{_fontdir}
%changelog
* Wed Dec 07 2009 Sven Lankes s...@lank.es - 20030318-2
- Change package-name to dustin-dustistmo-fonts
* Sun Dec 04 2009 Sven Lankes s...@lank.es - 20030318-1
- Use newer debian-source as source
- Convert to -multi spec
* Wed Dec 31 2008 Sven Lankes s...@lank.es - 20030207-1
- Initial packaging
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-10 .cvsignore,1.1,1.2 sources,1.1,1.2
Author: slankes Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3724/F-10 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Log Message: add the source file for the release branches Index: .cvsignore === RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-10/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 7 Jan 2009 00:04:31 - 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 7 Jan 2009 20:01:37 - 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +Dustismo.zip Index: sources === RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-10/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 7 Jan 2009 00:04:31 - 1.1 +++ sources 7 Jan 2009 20:01:37 - 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +de74f82082b7dba21e457b8bb32b88a5 Dustismo.zip ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-9 .cvsignore,1.1,1.2 sources,1.1,1.2
Author: slankes Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3724/F-9 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Log Message: add the source file for the release branches Index: .cvsignore === RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-9/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 7 Jan 2009 00:04:31 - 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 7 Jan 2009 20:01:37 - 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +Dustismo.zip Index: sources === RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-9/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 7 Jan 2009 00:04:31 - 1.1 +++ sources 7 Jan 2009 20:01:37 - 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +de74f82082b7dba21e457b8bb32b88a5 Dustismo.zip ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-07 15:10:45 EDT --- dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-07 15:09:54 EDT --- dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477427] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-07 18:09:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) (In reply to comment #9) ./lang/sm_utf8/fonts/default.ttf ./lang/to_utf8/fonts/default.ttf Arial Narrow, not OK. I can modify the source to strip this out, and then symlink to something, what would be a good replacement? I'll then notify upstream. No idea, maybe ask Jens Petersen? In fact Tongan and Samoan are already 100% covered by Dejavu (all families), so this is not only illegal, but totally unecesary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-07 23:16:50 EDT --- dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dustin-dustismo-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0309 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-07 23:19:01 EDT --- dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update dustin-dustismo-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0322 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 479100] [kn_IN] Conjunct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100 Padmanabhan V. K. bugzillas+padremovethi...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[kn_IN] Conjuct combination |[kn_IN] Conjunct |of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB |combination of U0C9D with |is rendering wrongly|U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering ||wrongly --- Comment #2 from Padmanabhan V. K. bugzillas+padremovethi...@gmail.com 2009-01-07 23:35:31 EDT --- Using the program from http://gfontview.sourceforge.net/ it is seen that there already are glyphs in the font named U0C9D_U0CCA.pstf and U0C9D_U0CCB.pstf which show the correct conjuncts. Only the mappings between the character combinations and the glyphs to be displayed need to be added/corrected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 428427] [kn_IN][fonts-indic] - 0CB5+0CCA is wrongly rendering
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428427 --- Comment #6 from Padmanabhan V. K. bugzillas+padremovethi...@gmail.com 2009-01-07 23:51:13 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328437) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328437) Incorrect rendering of U0CAA U0CCA U0CAB U0CCA Wrong Conjuct combinations are formed for U0CAA+U0CCA, U0CAB+U0CCA, U0CAA+U0CCB, and U0CAB+U0CCB as well. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fonts-kannada-2.1.5-3.fc8 How reproducible: 1. Every Time Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open gnome-character-map. 2. Select U0CAA followed by U0CCA followed by U0CAB followed by U0CCA. Actual results: As shown in the attached image Expected results: As shown by the following steps: 1. Install http://kannadakasturi.com/font/brhknd.ttf. 2. Open http://kannadakasturi.com/includes/transliterate.asp. 3. Enter the combination poPo. Additional info: 1. The fonts from http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=56358 also show the glyphs like kannadakasturi.com instead of like Lohit Kannada. 2. This is similar to the earlier issue reported here. 3. Using the program from http://gfontview.sourceforge.net/ it is seen that there already are glyphs in the font named U0CAC_U0CCA.pstf [can be renamed to the more appropriate U0CAA_U0CCA.pstf?] and U0CAB_U0CC3.abvs_U0CC0.psts [can be renamed to U0CAB_U0CCA.pstf?] which show the conjuncts like kannadakasturi.com. Only the mappings between the character combinations and the glyphs to be displayed seem to be incorrect. Hence I assume Lohit Kannada is at fault and not the other fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/cjkunifonts/devel cjkunifonts.spec,1.28,1.29
Author: cchance
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21724
Modified Files:
cjkunifonts.spec
Log Message:
repatched rev 11
Index: cjkunifonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel/cjkunifonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.28
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -u -r1.28 -r1.29
--- cjkunifonts.spec6 Jan 2009 02:24:34 - 1.28
+++ cjkunifonts.spec8 Jan 2009 07:00:44 - 1.29
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts derived from the original fonts generously made
\available by Arphic Technology under the Arphic Public License and extended \
by the CJK Unifonts project.
+%define umingbuilddir ../%{name}-uming-%{version}
+%define ukaibuilddir../%{name}-ukai-%{version}
%define umingfontdir%{_datadir}/fonts/%{name}-uming
%define ukaifontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{name}-ukai
%define cidmapdir %{_datadir}/ghostscript/conf.d
@@ -12,7 +14,7 @@
Name:%{fontname}
Version: 0.2.20080216.1
-Release: 11.2%{?dist}
+Release: 12%{?dist}
Summary: Chinese TrueType Fonts -- Simplified and Traditional Chinese Ming
and Kai Face
License: Arphic
Group: User Interface/X
@@ -95,23 +97,23 @@
install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}
-cd %{name}-uming-%{version}
+cd %{umingbuilddir}
for fconf in `ls *-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf`
do
install -m 0644 $fconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/
-ln -s %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \
-%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf
+cd %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/ \
+ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf $fconf \
+cd -
done
-cd ..
-
-cd %{name}-ukai-%{version}
+cd %{ukaibuilddir}
for fconf in `ls *-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf`
do
install -m 0644 $fconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/
-ln -s %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \
-%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf
+cd %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/ \
+ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf $fconf \
+cd -
done
-cd ..
+cd -
# backward compat
install -d %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType
@@ -176,14 +178,15 @@
%dir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW
%dir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType
%dir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType
-%{umingfontdir}/*.ttc
-%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf
%{cidmapdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW
%{cidmapdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN
%{cidmapdir}/cidfmap.zh_TW
%{cidmapdir}/cidfmap.zh_CN
%{cidmapdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_TW
%{cidmapdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_CN
+%{umingfontdir}/*.ttc
+%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf
+%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontconfig_confdir}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf
%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{umingfontdir}/fonts.dir
%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{umingfontdir}/fonts.scale
%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType/zysong.ttf
@@ -203,20 +206,21 @@
%doc %{ukaibuilddir}/README
%doc %{ukaibuilddir}/TODO
%dir %{ukaifontdir}
-%{ukaifontdir}/*.ttc
-%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf
%{cidmapdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW
%{cidmapdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN
%{cidmapdir}/cidfmap.zh_TW
%{cidmapdir}/cidfmap.zh_CN
%{cidmapdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_TW
%{cidmapdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_CN
+%{ukaifontdir}/*.ttc
+%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf
+%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontconfig_confdir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf
%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{ukaifontdir}/fonts.dir
%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{ukaifontdir}/fonts.scale
%{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai
%changelog
-* Tue Jan 06 2009 Caius Chance cchance at redhat.com -
0.2.20080216.1-11.2.fc11
+* Tue Jan 06 2009 Caius Chance cchance at redhat.com - 0.2.20080216.1-12.fc11
- Resolves: rhbz#477373 (Converted to new font packaging guidelines.)
* Sun Dec 7 2008 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com -
0.2.20080216.1-10.fc11
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477373, which changed state. Bug 477373 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 Caius CHANCE ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Caius CHANCE ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-08 02:22:47 EDT --- built http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=77668 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 Caius CHANCE ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Fwd: Account Security Question]
For your consideration. Forwarded Message From: Michael Tant mtant...@charter.net To: webmas...@fedoraproject.org Subject: Account Security Question Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:22:20 -0500 Upon creating my account on the fedoraproject site, I was asked to submit a public key and download a client certificate. First, what is the public key used for? I sent a 1024 rsa pubkey made with ssh-keygen. Does it have to be rsa or can I change that to a 2048 dsa key? I commonly use my windows side to access the internet and my linux side more as a server than a terminal side, though it has client side available. Should the dsa public key be kept on the browser side, or isolated to the linux side? The Private Key is kept offline on removable media. In regards to the certificate, it requests I add this to a particular location in the system. Is the certificate used to authenticate my sessions with fedoraproject or just for the purposes of linux developing? If it is used for authentication, can this be used on a windows based system, or should I login from my linux side? I'm not a developer as of yet, my programming skills are hardly up to par yet. Regardless of the use, events of yesterday lead me to ask, is this a MD5 hash or SHA1 or SHA2 hash? I ask this because of the collision exploit to md5 certificates. Please let me know, and if it is a MD5 hash, can I request a SHA clientside certificate? Being new to Linux, I am thrilled to to have membership in fedoraproject, as I have found linux nearly superior to windows in many areas. Thank You, Michael Tant -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams ivazquez...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: [Fwd: Account Security Question]
On 2009-01-07 02:56:43 PM, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: For your consideration. Forwarded Message From: Michael Tant mtant...@charter.net To: webmas...@fedoraproject.org Subject: Account Security Question Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:22:20 -0500 Upon creating my account on the fedoraproject site, I was asked to submit a public key and download a client certificate. First, what is the public key used for? I sent a 1024 rsa pubkey made with ssh-keygen. Does it have to be rsa or can I change that to a 2048 dsa key? I commonly use my windows side to access the internet and my linux side more as a server than a terminal side, though it has client side available. Should the dsa public key be kept on the browser side, or isolated to the linux side? The Private Key is kept offline on removable media. The public key is used if you need to authenticate to any of our services over SSH. This includes commit access for CVS and other code repositories or any shell access to our machines. We currently require RSA keys. You'll want to have your private key available on any machine that you use to SSH or commit code from. The public key is only needed on the machines that will be accepting your private key (which is why we ask for it). In regards to the certificate, it requests I add this to a particular location in the system. Is the certificate used to authenticate my sessions with fedoraproject or just for the purposes of linux developing? If it is used for authentication, can this be used on a windows based system, or should I login from my linux side? I'm not a developer as of yet, my programming skills are hardly up to par yet. Regardless of the use, events of yesterday lead me to ask, is this a MD5 hash or SHA1 or SHA2 hash? I ask this because of the collision exploit to md5 certificates. Please let me know, and if it is a MD5 hash, can I request a SHA clientside certificate? This certificiate is currently only used to authenticate to koji and plague, the buildsystems for Fedora and EPEL, although we're considering using key authentication in more places in the future. Right now, you'll only need a copy of it if you plan on becoming a package maintainer. Being new to Linux, I am thrilled to to have membership in fedoraproject, as I have found linux nearly superior to windows in many areas. Welcome! Thanks, Ricky pgpwZFqtRQJr4.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
FUDCon
Just a reminder to everyone, FUDCon is on the way soon. Many of us (myself included) will be traveling and not as available as usual. Please be extra careful about any changes you make. For example, don't make a change to our global.pp file and then get on an air plane. -Mike ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: FUDCon
I'll be sitting here in Brisbane if there is any urgentish issues during Brisbane hours (UTC+10), might as well let the FUDCon'ers have their fun :) - Nigel - Original Message - From: Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com To: Fedora Infrastructure List fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2009 3:14:29 PM GMT +10:00 Brisbane Subject: FUDCon Just a reminder to everyone, FUDCon is on the way soon. Many of us (myself included) will be traveling and not as available as usual. Please be extra careful about any changes you make. For example, don't make a change to our global.pp file and then get on an air plane. -Mike ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
/proc/sys/fs/epoll/max_user_instances=128 considered harmful
The F10 kernel has /proc/sys/fs/epoll/max_user_instances set to 128 by default. Apache httpd uses one epoll fd (instance) per child process, so this sets a hard limit on 128 children (i.e. 100 concurrent clients) out of the box. 1) shouldn't this be an rlimit so that we can bump it appropriately in the parent as root? 2) can we get it tweaked in the default sysctl.conf to be something more sane, e.g. 1024? Regards, Joe ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: /proc/sys/fs/epoll/max_user_instances=128 considered harmful
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 03:18:12PM +, Joe Orton wrote: The F10 kernel has /proc/sys/fs/epoll/max_user_instances set to 128 by default. Apache httpd uses one epoll fd (instance) per child process, so this sets a hard limit on 128 children (i.e. 100 concurrent clients) out of the box. 1) shouldn't this be an rlimit so that we can bump it appropriately in the parent as root? possibly. It's a question better asked on linux-kernel really. This does sound like a better change to me than forcing the sysctl change on everyone. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: Enabling drivers in staging tree in rawhide
CCing fedora-kernel On 08.01.2009 03:49, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Quite a bit of new drivers in http://lwn.net/Articles/313730/ Related: I raised the staging problem already in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477927 as rawhide contained the at76 driver as separate patch http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewvc/rpms/kernel/devel/linux-2.6-at76.patch?view=markup -- but the same driver (with two small changes) also was part of the upstream kernel since October/2.6.28-rc as one of the staging drivers: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=99e06e372378c5833a0c60274b645dfb2e4a4b08 (for more details see bug). That sounds wrong to me, as - it's duplicated work - the at76 staging driver from upstream taints the kernel; the driver from our patch doesn't. The ralink wireless drivers for example would hopefully make the newer EEE PC model would out of the box. Does it make sense to enable the drivers in staging tree by default and bring more exposure to them atleast via rawhide if not in general releases? +1 to the I think providing hardware support in rawhide and then removing it before release would be somewhat user-hostile. comment from mjg59. IOW: Either enable or disable them. I'm unsure myself what to do but I tend to say that disabling the whole staging drivers might be the best for Fedora (Greg calls himself as maintainer of crap for a good reason). @Davej, Cebbert and Kylem: What's your position on this? If they are disabled completely in Fedora then I'll nevertheless consider to create a kmod-staging package for RPM Fusion. CU knurd ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
get free cd fedora 10
How can I get cd Fedora 10? -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Installing Fedora 9 on an old dual xeon w/scsi
a bit of background.. I am a newb who just recently became interested in setting up a home server and Amahi caught my attention, which requries fedora 9.. I am running a dual xeon 1.7 and trying to install to a 17gig scsi. I followed all indications and downloaded the x86_64 dvd iso and burned it without issue. Upon bootup I got the msg that it was the wrong kernel and that I needed an i1586.. After a bit of poking around I found that this is the msg you get when you are trying to install 64 bit on 32 bit. So I downloaded the i386 dvd iso and burned it without issue. It gets a bit further in the vmlinuz, until you hit agpgart: Detected an intel i860 chipset, and then hangs (keyboard locked, 3 finger salute no worky) Now before I go and download another version, I need to know which version thatmight be if it isn't either one of the 2 I have already tried? If the version isn't the problem, then what can I do/change about what I am doing to make this puppy fly? Thanks for the help, Aaron -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: get free cd fedora 10
harry sedeng wrote: How can I get cd Fedora 10? http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora -- Most people can't understand how others can blow their noses differently than they do. -- Turgenev mei-mei.gres...@greshko.com http://tw.youtube.com/watch?v=cCSz_koUhSg -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: NetworkManager: IP address == Broadcast address?
Rick Stevens wrote: [snip] Question: Is this a bug? I'm no IP addressing expert so IP address == broadcast address might be valid. It is absolutely incorrect. Your NIC should NOT have the broadcast address as its IP address. Thanks. That's good to know. [snip] I believe there is/was a bug in NM, so make sure you update it. You may have to hand-edit the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ppp0 script to fix it. My system is already updated and there's no newer NetworkManager. In updates-testing I only see an update to NetworkManager-openvpn. Unfortunately The ifcfg-ppp0 script you refer to does not exist on my system. The only ones I have on my laptop are: [r...@localhost ~]# locate ifcfg- /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-lo /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-wlan0 /usr/lib64/NetworkManager/libnm-settings-plugin-ifcfg-fedora.so /usr/share/doc/irda-utils-0.9.18/ifcfg-irlan0 Any ideas? Thanks, Patrick -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Installing Fedora 9 on an old dual xeon w/scsi
So I downloaded the i386 dvd iso and burned it without issue. That DVD should work. It gets a bit further in the vmlinuz, until you hit agpgart: Detected an intel i860 chipset, and then hangs (keyboard locked, 3 finger salute no worky) That would be a bug. Now before I go and download another version, I need to know which version thatmight be if it isn't either one of the 2 I have already tried? If the version isn't the problem, then what can I do/change about what I am doing to make this puppy fly? The install guide has some suggestions on boot options you can try. It may also be worth checking if any related hangs were fixed in updates - if so then Fedora 10 or the Fedora 9 respins might work better. Offhand I can't remember one, or a matching bug report but others may know. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Is this problem solvable?
2009/1/7 Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net: Before leaving home on a visit to Italy (where I am now) Welcome to Italy ;) I noticed that shorewall did not print out its usual messages, Which messages? but foolishly did not check what caused this. Now I can ping the machine, If you can ping the machine so I guess it's up and running. but cannot ssh into it (I chose a strange port) or access its web-server. If you got that port reachable from the internet, but you don't remember the ssh port number you used, you could scan your IP to discover it using, for example, nmap. My question is: given that I can ping the machine, is there any way I can re-boot it remotely, or even just re-start shorewall? No, using ping only :-) Cheers -- Giuseppe Fuggiano -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Single mouse click interpreted as a double click
Dear All, I am using F10 and I am noticing recently that when I click once on the mouse button, sometimes, my single click is interpreted as a double one. How can I fix it? Is this a bug? Thanks in advance, Paul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Lost audio on headphones (F9)
I had the same problem with Fedora 10. The headphones didn't work after an update I did yesterday (Jan 6, 2009). I have currently alsa driver version 1.0.8. They were shipped from the start with Fedora 10, so that it seems that the drivers were not the problem. Then I tried to use the previous version of the kernel and now the headphones work again!! The previous version that works OK is: 2.6.27.7-134.fc10.x86_64 The version that doesn't work is: 2.6.27.9-159.fc10.x86_64 This thread in the forum helped my A LOT. Thanks, Mario - Mario Alberto Storti [cel. +54-342-156144983] CIMEC (INTEC/CONICET-UNL), Guemes 3450 - 3000 Santa Fe, Argentina Tel: +54-342-4511594 (ext 1015), Tel/Fax: +54-342-4511169 e-mail: mario.storti at gmail.com http://www.cimec.org.ar/mstorti [1] - Links: -- [1] http://www.cimec.org.ar/mstorti -- This is an email sent via The Fedora Community Portal https://fcp.surfsite.org https://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=316848topic_id=64016forum=10#forumpost316848 If you think, this is spam, please report this to webmas...@fcp.surfsite.org and/or blame mario.sto...@gmail.com. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Help -- can't SSH into my box
On Tuesday 06 January 2009, Stuart Sears wrote: Not wishing :) to open a massive can of worms (even though this probably will) but why do you hate it so much? Precisely because it interferes with so many other things. If SELinux ever gets to the point where it plays nice with other things, or at least has a nice, easy ignore this app sort of thing (like antivirus/anti-spyware apps in Windoze) I might reconsider it. Until then, I'm going to disable it whenever possible. I installed fail2ban and SELinux immediately threw up massive errors. I coudl understand that much better if it were some 3rd-party app, but something out of the default Fedora repos should be able to run w/o generating complaints from a security system. Fail2ban, especially, should be allowed to run w/o issue, due to the very nature of it. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Help -- can't SSH into my box
On Tuesday 06 January 2009, Kevin Kofler wrote: As for quick launch icons, just right-click and Add to panel in the Kickoff menu, or dragdrop the menu entry to the panel in the classic menu. (You can right-click on the menu button and use Switch to Classic menu style to switch to the good old classic menu.) If that's the case, I think I'll switch back to Gnome, and just use my KDE apps. You can do that, but I'm sure KDE 4 _can_ be set up to your liking. :-) Well, when KDE4.2 gets here, I'll give it another shot. :-) -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Help -- can't SSH into my box
John Aldrich wrote: On Tuesday 06 January 2009, Stuart Sears wrote: Not wishing :) to open a massive can of worms (even though this probably will) but why do you hate it so much? I installed fail2ban and SELinux immediately threw up massive errors. I coudl understand that much better if it were some 3rd-party app, but something out of the default Fedora repos should be able to run w/o generating complaints from a security system. Fail2ban, especially, should be allowed to run w/o issue, due to the very nature of it. You have something strange in your setup if it throws lot of errors with fail2ban as I just recently installed it in F10 when I needed alternative to whitelisting just some ip-addresses. And it haven't given any errors. Actually in F10 i haven't had any selinux alerts yet. Of course I don't use it as desktop and there isn't currently users home directories (or part of them) shared trough httpd or samba. But it has just plain worked this far. I was suprised that even cyrus imapd worked out of the box without any problems and it's maybe less used that dovecot. Maybe you tried it with some early policy version which has been updated and now just works. Anyway what I have worked with selinux on some customer installations it's not very hard to get it configured to work just the way you want if you just take littlebit time to understand it and how the rule system works. Of course I was first littlebit hesitant with it and usually disabled it, but that usually comes with the mindset of being system administrator (All change is for bad :). Also if there is plain errors with it on basic configurations I think it would be worthwhile to file bugs on them so that they will get fixed. Of course I didn't try to fix fail2ban to work with anything else than ssh as it's enough for me for now. So it could have problems with httpd or mailclient filtering enabled. Veli-Pekka -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Mount usb drive with mount -a fails after f10 upgrade
Jeff Spaleta wrote: On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Joe W. Byers ecjb...@aol.com wrote: Mount count: 8 Maximum mount count: 1 Last checked: Sat Jan 3 14:45:33 2009 Check interval: 15552000 (6 months) Next check after: Thu Jul 2 15:45:33 2009 Take a moment and review what those lines in the tune2fs output mean the ext2/ext3 filesystem can be configured via tune2fs to require a fsck check periodically in two ways. One is mount count and the other is time interval since last check. You have both ways configured. And more importantly...the filesystem is configured to require a check after ONE mount! The system is doing exactly what the filesystem superblock is asking it to do..do an fsck after each mount. This is not what you want. use the tune2fs -c option and set the maximum mount count to something sane or turn it off completely. -jef Jeff, I never set this. I hooked this drive up in 2005 and have been using without any issues since until this upgrade. My server would reboot and notify me that this needed a check and I did it or did not. Never was a problem until this upgrade. The only interesting thing with EL5 was the usb would not mount during the normal mounting sequence but give me an [Failure], then mount later on during the boot up. I never really worried about that because the usb drive was getting mounted automatically. Now it is not and that is was I need. Joe -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Flash player with Fedora 9
Go to the Fedora FAQ website and look for the information explaining how to install. I followed it and it worked just fine --- On Tue, 1/6/09, Anne Wilson an...@kde.org wrote: From: Anne Wilson an...@kde.org Subject: Re: Flash player with Fedora 9 To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora-list@redhat.com Date: Tuesday, January 6, 2009, 7:54 AM On Tuesday 06 January 2009 00:56:05 Jerry Ro wrote: hi, did anyone manager to install a flash player on fedora 9 with firefox? I followed the exact instructions from fedora (when it told me install flash driver) and downloaded an rpm they suggested, installed it using YUM, but it still won't work. (did it as root.) this is what happens when i try to run yum again on the package (at first it installed it, now after it is installed:) [r...@localhost jer]# yum install adobe-release-i386-1.0-1.noarch.rpm Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit updates-newkey | 2.3 kB 00:00 fedora | 2.4 kB 00:00 updates | 2.6 kB 00:00 adobe-linux-i386 | 951 B 00:00 primary.xml.gz | 10 kB 00:00 adobe-linux-i386 17/17 Setting up Install Process Parsing package install arguments Examining adobe-release-i386-1.0-1.noarch.rpm: adobe-release-i386-1.0-1.noarch adobe-release-i386-1.0-1.noarch.rpm: does not update installed package. Nothing to do which makes me believe it is installed. any ideas? F9 required an extra package to be installed - IIRC it is called libflashsupport (could have a hyphen in there somewhere?) Anne -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Single mouse click interpreted as a double click
2009/1/7 Paul Smith phh...@gmail.com: Dear All, I am using F10 and I am noticing recently that when I click once on the mouse button, sometimes, my single click is interpreted as a double one. How can I fix it? Is this a bug? Are you sure that the mouse is OK? -- Martín Marqués select 'martin.marques' || '@' || 'gmail.com' DBA, Programador, Administrador -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Flash player with Fedora 9
Jerry Also, look here: http://fedorasolved.org/browser-solutions/flash/?searchterm=flash I hope helps you. Regards, - - iarly selbir ( Ski0s ) On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Leslie Satenstein lsatenst...@yahoo.comwrote: Go to the Fedora FAQ website and look for the information explaining how to install. I followed it and it worked just fine --- On *Tue, 1/6/09, Anne Wilson an...@kde.org* wrote: From: Anne Wilson an...@kde.org Subject: Re: Flash player with Fedora 9 To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora-list@redhat.com Date: Tuesday, January 6, 2009, 7:54 AM On Tuesday 06 January 2009 00:56:05 Jerry Ro wrote: hi, did anyone manager to install a flash player on fedora 9 with firefox? I followed the exact instructions from fedora (when it told me install flash driver) and downloaded an rpm they suggested, installed it using YUM, but it still won't work. (did it as root.) this is what happens when i try to run yum again on the package (at first it installed it, now after it is installed:) [r...@localhost jer]# yum install adobe-release-i386-1.0-1.noarch.rpm Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit updates-newkey | 2.3 kB 00:00 fedora | 2.4 kB 00:00 updates | 2.6 kB 00:00 adobe-linux-i386 | 951 B 00:00 primary.xml.gz | 10 kB 00:00 adobe-linux-i386 17/17 Setting up Install Process Parsing package install arguments Examining adobe-release-i386-1.0-1.noarch.rpm: adobe-release-i386-1.0-1.noarch adobe-release-i386-1.0-1.noarch.rpm: does not update installed package. Nothing to do which makes me believe it is installed. any ideas? F9 required an extra package to be installed - IIRC it is called libflashsupport (could have a hyphen in there somewhere?) Anne -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Fedora 9, OpenOffice 3 and Arial Black
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 13:04 +0200, Nicolae Ghimbovschi wrote: It seems that Openoffice 3 (the build from openoffice.org) in Fedora 9 can't use the arial black ttf font. While in F10 Openoffice 3(fedora build) can. fc-list : family file | grep Arial /usr/share/fonts/drakfnt/ttf/arial.ttf: Arial /usr/share/fonts/drakfnt/ttf/ariali.ttf: Arial /usr/share/fonts/drakfnt/ttf/ARLRDBD.ttf: Arial Rounded MT Bold /usr/share/fonts/drakfnt/ttf/arialbd.ttf: Arial /usr/share/fonts/drakfnt/ttf/arialbi.ttf: Arial /usr/share/fonts/drakfnt/ttf/ARIALUNI.ttf: Arial Unicode MS /usr/share/fonts/drakfnt/ttf/ariblk.ttf: Arial,Arial Black It is very weird that ariblk.ttf can't be used by the same version of OpenOffice 3 in different versions of Fedora. I just don't understand, what exactly is different. maybe there's something wrong with your Arial Black font. Did you install it from msttcorefonts at sourceforge.net? Craig -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
F10 -- Failure to create ./resolv.conf.predhclient.eth0
Finally got some time to install F10 yesterday. Wiped away a working F7 install to do so. Selected dhcp to get up and running, and all worked A-OK. After the first reboot, I went back to configure static addressing on eth0. The operation failed and I received an SELinux alert that stated: SELinux is preventing mv (dhcp_t) create to ./resolv.conf.predhclient.eth0 (net_conf_t). The SELinux recommendation was to execute: restorecon -v './resolv.conf.predhclient.eth0' That operation failed with a file not found message. A search of the filesystem did not turn up a copy of the file...anywhere. So...there is no file for mv to use as the source. I reconfigured and went back to dhcp, but that fails. I now have no network connectivity with either dhcp or static addressing. Any ideas? BTW, from first glance, I really like F10. Dave McGuffey Principal Information System Security Engineer // NSA-IEM, NSA-IAM SAIC, IISBU, Columbia, MD Save a Tree...Unless necessary don't print this e-mail -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Fedora 9, OpenOffice 3 and Arial Black
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 16:04, Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com wrote: On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 13:04 +0200, Nicolae Ghimbovschi wrote: It seems that Openoffice 3 (the build from openoffice.org) in Fedora 9 can't use the arial black ttf font. While in F10 Openoffice 3(fedora build) can. fc-list : family file | grep Arial /usr/share/fonts/drakfnt/ttf/arial.ttf: Arial /usr/share/fonts/drakfnt/ttf/ariali.ttf: Arial /usr/share/fonts/drakfnt/ttf/ARLRDBD.ttf: Arial Rounded MT Bold /usr/share/fonts/drakfnt/ttf/arialbd.ttf: Arial /usr/share/fonts/drakfnt/ttf/arialbi.ttf: Arial /usr/share/fonts/drakfnt/ttf/ARIALUNI.ttf: Arial Unicode MS /usr/share/fonts/drakfnt/ttf/ariblk.ttf: Arial,Arial Black It is very weird that ariblk.ttf can't be used by the same version of OpenOffice 3 in different versions of Fedora. I just don't understand, what exactly is different. maybe there's something wrong with your Arial Black font. Did you I don't think so, because the same font works great in OO3 from F10 . install it from msttcorefonts at sourceforge.net? I didn't install msttcorefonts, I copied all fonts manually. Craig -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Help -- can't SSH into my box
Tim wrote: On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 15:17 -0500, John Aldrich wrote: From what I've read, it appeared that there was no way to *not* have selinux and that the best you could do was to have it run in permissive mode. I'll have to give that a shot. Incorrect. Whilst it's a recompile-everything-yourself customisation nightmare to rip it out of a system, you can disable it. Not so. You can completely disable it with selinux=0 on the kernel command line. -- Chris -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Is this problem solvable?
Timothy Murphy wrote: Before leaving home on a visit to Italy (where I am now) I re-booted my server. I noticed that shorewall did not print out its usual messages, but foolishly did not check what caused this. Now I can ping the machine, but cannot ssh into it (I chose a strange port) or access its web-server. My question is: given that I can ping the machine, is there any way I can re-boot it remotely, or even just re-start shorewall? If there is, it's a very serious bug. -- Chris -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Upgrade to OpenOffice 3 on F9
Is there a way to upgrade from OpenOffice 2.4 to 3.0 on f9? Thanks. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: xml editors for f9
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote: Dave Feustel wrote: I've been looking for an xml editor to use on F9, but so far I am batting 0%. I have tried a couple of proprietary xml editors, but they don't work on my system. Are there any opensource xml editors that run on F9? Where have you looked? open source xml editor google search returns results. Have you tried any of those? free xml editor linux also gives a bunch of results, the first one of which is a page devoted to free editors (though it's not clear in which sense of free). poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Is this problem solvable?
Chris Snook wrote: Timothy Murphy wrote: Before leaving home on a visit to Italy (where I am now) I re-booted my server. I noticed that shorewall did not print out its usual messages, but foolishly did not check what caused this. Now I can ping the machine, but cannot ssh into it (I chose a strange port) or access its web-server. My question is: given that I can ping the machine, is there any way I can re-boot it remotely, or even just re-start shorewall? If there is, it's a very serious bug. -- Chris To do it yourself would be a bad bad bug, as Chris mentioned. Now, doing it the manual way, if you have a person available that has physical access to the server, you can reboot it remotely, and restart shorewall rather easily and without a bad security hole. ~Seann smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: HiJacking Threads Was: hostapd for Fedora 10
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote: Don't you think that would be a time wasting sorting practice...especially when you consider that there could be multiple unique threads, each with dozens of messages in a given folder? Most modern mail clients seem to cache this information in local files, same as they do with index info (to avoid having to parse a potentially huge mbox file every time they visit a folder). Don't you think using another header designed to help that task would be useful? Of course I do. I have nothing against the References header. My only point is that In-Reply-To is still very much in use. This is really getting quite OT. The original issue was that Subject threading is only ever used as a last resort (at least in Linux/Unix clients) so people messing with it in the hope of changing the thread topology are wasting their own and everyone else's time. poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Firefox 3.05 attempting to execute code on stack
Dave Feustel wrote: SELinux is reporting attempts by Firefox 3.05-1 to execute code on the stack on 32-bit f9. Time for a Firefox upgrade? Java plugin? Bryn. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
ftp question
Hi When I change this file /etc/passwd from /home/userA to /ftp/userA eg: userA:x:502:502::/ftp/userA:/bin/bash After change this passwd file, I can't logon as ftp but ssh is fine Thank you Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Upgrade to OpenOffice 3 on F9
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 09:39 -0500, Dave Feustel wrote: Is there a way to upgrade from OpenOffice 2.4 to 3.0 on f9? not in a supported way but... you could either install packages from OOo or try rebuilding SRPM's from F10. If it were me, I would just upgrade to F10 and get upgrade goodness beyond OOo 3 Craig -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: HiJacking Threads Was: hostapd for Fedora 10
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote: Don't you think that would be a time wasting sorting practice...especially when you consider that there could be multiple unique threads, each with dozens of messages in a given folder? Most modern mail clients seem to cache this information in local files, same as they do with index info (to avoid having to parse a potentially huge mbox file every time they visit a folder). Yet, it is good to know that they don't rely only solely on the In-Reply-To header...as you've found out. Don't you think using another header designed to help that task would be useful? Of course I do. I have nothing against the References header. My only point is that In-Reply-To is still very much in use. Nobody ever claimed that it wasn't being utilized. This is really getting quite OT. The original issue was that Subject threading is only ever used as a last resort (at least in Linux/Unix clients) so people messing with it in the hope of changing the thread topology are wasting their own and everyone else's time. -- It was the most I ever threw up, and it changed my life forever. -- Homer Simpson Homer Goes To College mei-mei.gres...@greshko.com http://tw.youtube.com/watch?v=cCSz_koUhSg signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Netbook wifi, wlan0 and inet6 address (F10)
I'm running wpa_supplicant, but right now I'm on an unprotected network. network is not running: ~# service network status Configured devices: lo eth0 pan0 wlan0 Currently active devices: lo eth0 wmaster0 wlan0 ~# chkconfig --list network network 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off ~# chkconfig --list NetworkManager NetworkManager 0:off 1:off 2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off Looks like you're using the madwifi driver. I haven't used it on my AA1 in Fedora as the ath5k driver in the newer kernels have been working for me. Nothing atheros-related is blacklisted in /etc/modprobe.d; /etc.modprobe.conf is empty. /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts# cat ifcfg-wlan0 # Atheros Communications Inc. AR242x 802.11abg Wireless PCI Express Adapter DEVICE=wlan0 HWADDR=00:22:69:92:f3:a3 /etc/sysconfig# cat network NETWORKING=yes HOSTNAME=Labradorite Nothing particularly interesting that I can see in sysconfig, but I've included it just in case. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Which part of Kernel contains /Documnetation/DocBook?
Thank Giuseppe. Can I use make menuconfig to install or compile compile to get this dir? --- Giuseppe Fuggiano giuseppe.fuggi...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/1/7 hutx h...@yahoo.com: I am buliding a project which needs to complile linux Kernel. It builds /usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-1.2798.fc6-i686/Documentation/DocBook/Makefile. Generally it's wrong to compile the linux kernel into /usr/src/. You should download the Linux source code from http://www.kernel.org/ where you can choose the precise version you are looking for. By the way, I don't know if Fedora does provide some particular kernel patches you should also apply (obviously at your choice), but I guess yes. -- Giuseppe Fuggiano -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: HiJacking Threads Was: hostapd for Fedora 10
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au wrote: Tim: You can test for that yourself with any collection of messages belonging to a thread, remove the messages linked directly together by the in-reply-to headers. (Copy a thread to a test folder, remove the every second generation of messages.) Patrick O'Callaghan: That's an ingenious idea. I tried it with Evolution and indeed it works, so Evo at least *does* appear to take note of the References header. All the same, when I delete the common parent of two messages (which were previously at the same hierarchical level) then one appears as the parent of the other, even when I turn off the fall back on Subject threading option, so the conclusion is not completely iron-clad, i.e. Evo seems to be doing something else (I checked carefully that neither message had the Message-ID of the other anywhere in its headers.) Do you have another client installed to compare behaviours? I think the fall back might be additionally sort by date, but I'd expect them to appear as children to the initial post. Though the order of messages listed in the references header might be used. I did a cursory test with Thunderbird (not the current version but a preview of version 3, so it might not apply to v2) and it seems to be basically the same as Evo. One thing I noticed is that when a parent is deleted the first descendant is promoted to be the new parent, even if other siblings exist, i.e. there's no representation of a missing parent. The eldest son takes over as head of the family :-) This also applies to Evo. poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Upgrade to OpenOffice 3 on F9
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 08:02:03AM -0700, Craig White wrote: On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 09:39 -0500, Dave Feustel wrote: Is there a way to upgrade from OpenOffice 2.4 to 3.0 on f9? not in a supported way but... you could either install packages from OOo or try rebuilding SRPM's from F10. If it were me, I would just upgrade to F10 and get upgrade goodness beyond OOo 3 Craig Upgrading is my goal, but I want to install on a new disk so as not to wipe out f9 until I know f10 works ok. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: NetworkManager: IP address == Broadcast address?
Rick Stevens wrote: Patrick wrote: Hi, Problem: Internet via a Nokia from a laptop with F10 x86_64 does not (no longer?) work. Assigned IP address on laptop is the same as the broadcast address. A laptop with up-to-date Fedora 10 x86_64, NetworkManager version 0.7.0-0.12.svn4326, a Nokia E71 and a USB cable for use between the Nokia and the laptop. The Nokia has a working permanent GPRS Internet connection. Steps I do to setup a link between the laptop and Nokia: 1) I added the T-Mobile mobile broadband profile in NetworkManager 2) I plug the USB cable into the phone and laptop and select PC Suite on the phone when asked 3) I select the T-Mobile profile in NetworkManager 4) NM starts chewing and reports after a few secs that a connection has been setup Result: Internet no longer works on the Nokia nor from the laptop via the Nokia. In NetworkManager I select Connection Information and notice that the IP address and Broadcast address are the same. Pings fail except to the public IP address assigned to the laptop. Question: Is this a bug? I'm no IP addressing expert so IP address == broadcast address might be valid. It is absolutely incorrect. Your NIC should NOT have the broadcast address as its IP address. Not so. PPP doesn't have subnets the way ethernet does, so broadcast is meaningless in this context. Your netmask should always be 255.255.255.255 for a PPP connection, so the only address that could possibly be calculated for a broadcast address is your own IP address. The only bug is that NetworkManager is showing a broadcast address at all for a PPP connection. It should probably not do that, to avoid exactly this sort of confusion. -- Chris -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Firefox 3.05 attempting to execute code on stack
Dave Feustel wrote: On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 02:54:06PM +, Bryn M. Reeves wrote: Dave Feustel wrote: SELinux is reporting attempts by Firefox 3.05-1 to execute code on the stack on 32-bit f9. Time for a Firefox upgrade? Java plugin? Bryn. I have no idea. Maybe something to do with Flash. Possibly, although I doubt it - I've never seen a flash plugin that attempted this but I have seen a number of JVMs do it (I assume it's something to do with jit), mostly older ones iirc, so it's probably worth checking for updates if you have a JRE installed that's not part of the distribution. Bryn. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: best video card for fedora 10
ATI and Nvidia cannot match what Intel provides in terms of video drivers. Video using Intel is flawless. Cannot say the same for the other two. Leslie --- On Mon, 1/5/09, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak m...@avtechpulse.com wrote: From: Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak m...@avtechpulse.com Subject: Re: best video card for fedora 10 To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora-list@redhat.com Date: Monday, January 5, 2009, 9:11 AM Petrus de Calguarium wrote: Stick with the motherboard's onboard Intel graphics. Supports 3D and works great on the modern desktop. No proprietary drivers required. Just install system and go! Unless you have one of the new systems like the HP DC7900, which has Intel graphics and a DisplayPort connector... and no other video connectors... DisplayPort is not yet supported by the intel driver, at all. I slapped in an ATI card to gain a DVI port, and used the open driver. Works fine now. - Mike -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: df hangs -- nfs related problem
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Rick Stevens ri...@nerd.com wrote:
Aldo Foot wrote:
I have a NFS client in which the df commands hangs. I have to manually
kill it to get back to the prompt.
The client had a nfs export mounted, but as of now the export is not
available to the client, and the client is trying to access it.
Is there a way to terminate the nfs mount on the client?
There are no messages in the log files pointing to this.
I know its a nfs problem because strace bails out when it tries
to access /mnt/nfs.
**command output trimmed for clarity.
% strace df -h
statfs64(/proc/fs/nfsd, 84, {f_type=0x6e667364, f_bsize=4096,
f_blocks=0, \
f_bfree=0, f_bavail=0, f_files=0, f_ffree=0, f_fsid={0, 0},
f_namelen=255, f_frsize=4096}) = 0
statfs64(/mnt/nfs, 84,
The mtab shows the export
nfsclient cat /etc/mtab
nfsserver:/stor1 /mnt/nfs nfs rw,addr=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 0 0
The mount command also shows the relevant line.
nfsclient mount -l
nfsserver:/stor1 on /mnt/nfs type nfs (rw,addr=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx)
Umount says the nfs export is busy --but there is nothing there.
nfsclient umount nfsserver:/stor1
umount: /mnt/nfs: device is busy
umount: /mnt/nfs: device is busy
Cannot see what processes (if any) are accessing nfsserver:/stor1 because
the lsof command hangs just like df.
Umount does not find anything either.
nfsclient umount /stor1
umount: /stor1: not found
A cron job created a number of df processes over several days that I had
to kill manually on the nfsclient.
Does anyone have a tip about this? A web search did not yield much.
Try lsof | grep nfs to see if anything has the mountpoint open. If
not, try umount -f /mnt/nfs as the root user to try a forced umount.
Also check to see if the mount command (or /etc/fstab entry) has hard
specified (that's the default as well). Unless you're really certain
about the stability of the network and of the NFS server, I'd recommend
you specify soft in the mount command (see man 5 nfs for details).
That would depend on which is worse, potentially losing data or having
a client machine hang because the server is (perhaps temporarily)
unavailable. It depends totally on the specific application scenario.
To quote nfs(5):
quote
A so-called soft timeout can cause silent data corruption in
certain cases. As such, use the soft option only when client
responsiveness is more important than data integrity. Using NFS over
TCP or increasing the value of the retrans option may mitigate some
of the risks of using the soft option.
/quote
IOW there is no right answer to this.
poc
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Fedora 10
Hi all I am using fedora 10 I need a client vpn to connect to my off systems can any one guide me. -- Thanks Regards Sachin Murudkar Sr. Specialist Solutions DUX Soft Pvt. Ltd Complexity Simplified Mobile : +91 9819565900 Fax : +91 22 4057 2894 Board : +91 22 4057 2800 Email : sac...@duxsoft.com www.DUXSoft.com -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Network Manager, Firefox and more on FC10
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 10:20 PM, David R Wilson da...@wwns.com wrote: Firefox refuses to handle a bad certificate. That is all well and good, until your dealing with a firewall that doesn't have one that is valid. I didn't find a way to get beyond the complaint about the certificate. I had to grab my laptop with FC9 to deal with that problem. FC10 made doing anything with the https interface impossible. It does not refuse to handle invalid certificates, it just pesters you to accept them. You can do so permanently or just for the current session, your choice. Look carefully at the popup dialog and click the magic buttons. poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Firefox 3.05 attempting to execute code on stack
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 03:14:39PM +, Bryn M. Reeves wrote: Dave Feustel wrote: On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 02:54:06PM +, Bryn M. Reeves wrote: Dave Feustel wrote: SELinux is reporting attempts by Firefox 3.05-1 to execute code on the stack on 32-bit f9. Time for a Firefox upgrade? Java plugin? Bryn. I have no idea. Maybe something to do with Flash. Possibly, although I doubt it - I've never seen a flash plugin that attempted this but I have seen a number of JVMs do it (I assume it's something to do with jit), mostly older ones iirc, so it's probably worth checking for updates if you have a JRE installed that's not part of the distribution. Bryn. The offending file is a plugin called npviewer. Java was updated yesterday. I think this was activated as a result of my attempts to get Flash working with Firefox. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Firefox 3.05 attempting to execute code on stack
SELinux is reporting attempts by Firefox 3.05-1 to execute code on the stack on 32-bit f9. Time for a Firefox upgrade? -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: FC10 Kernel PANIC ... Odd
Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: I did a clean FC10 install on a server today. The installation itself went without a hitch, the system rebooted and came back up. I logged in, admired the new graphics and then decided to run updates. When all the updates were done installing, I hit a restart only to be presented with a kernel PANIC. It won't boot. And at the time, I didn't have any means of capturing the message either. It was very short, a one liner at the top of the screen, something with ld.so...yaddi yaddi yadda. Ok, this is why we have a rescue option, right? So I booted from the DVD, went into rescue mode and looked at what kernel was installed. Much to my surprise, the latest kernel was installed (from the updates), however it was the .i586 version. Odd, this machine has never run an i586 package that I can remember. It's either an .i386 or an .i686, but never .i586. Could that have been the problem? Hmm, let's try ... I force installed the .i686 version of the kernel and kernel-devel packages and rebooted. Tada! It worked and came up beautifully. Inquiring minds want to know: why did the update install an .i586 version (when an .i686 version was available)? The machine has a dual core 3.4GHz Intel processor in it. Through all of FC7, FC8, and FC9 I've never had problems upgrading the kernel and have never seen it install an .i586 ... till today. And that failed miserably. Should it have been able to boot the .i586? I'd be curious to know if the i586 kernel boots with 'nosmp' on the kernel command line. It's a kernel bug either way, but that would give us a good idea where to look. It's also a yum bug that it got there at all in the first place. -- Chris -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Firefox 3.05 attempting to execute code on stack
Dave Feustel wrote: On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 03:14:39PM +, Bryn M. Reeves wrote: Dave Feustel wrote: On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 02:54:06PM +, Bryn M. Reeves wrote: Dave Feustel wrote: SELinux is reporting attempts by Firefox 3.05-1 to execute code on the stack on 32-bit f9. Time for a Firefox upgrade? Java plugin? Bryn. I have no idea. Maybe something to do with Flash. Possibly, although I doubt it - I've never seen a flash plugin that attempted this but I have seen a number of JVMs do it (I assume it's something to do with jit), mostly older ones iirc, so it's probably worth checking for updates if you have a JRE installed that's not part of the distribution. Bryn. The offending file is a plugin called npviewer. Java was updated yesterday. I think this was activated as a result of my attempts to get Flash working with Firefox. Fedora wraps all browser plugins with nppluginwrapper now - you need to find out what plugin that instance of npviewer was executing in order to know who to blame. Bryn. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Netbook wifi, wlan0 and inet6 address (F10)
Anne Wilson wrote: On Tuesday 06 January 2009 23:58:33 Steven I Usdansky wrote: Wireless is working fine on my Aspire One in F10 (using GNOME and connecting via NetworkManager). Kernel is 2.6.27.9-159.fc10.i686 if that makes any difference. I have the same kernel. ~$ sudo lsmod | grep ath dm_multipath 17164 0 ath5k 112520 0 mac80211 173668 1 ath5k cfg80211 23816 2 ath5k,mac80211 My output is very different - which may be the result of my various efforts to get a driver running - whether ath5k or madwifi: lsmod | grep ath dm_multipath 17164 0 ath_rate_sample14848 1 ath_pci 162360 0 wlan 189748 4 wlan_scan_sta,ath_rate_sample,ath_pci ath_hal 302176 3 ath_rate_sample,ath_pci and, FWIW, my startup configuration: /etc/rc3.d$ ls K01dnsmasq K75ntpdateS08ip6tables S50bluetooth K01livesys-late K76openvpnS08iptablesS58ntpd K01smartdK85mdmonitor S12rsyslog S80sendmail K05anacron K87multipathd S13irqbalance S85gpm K05saslauthd K87restorecondS22messagebus S90crond K10psacctK89netplugd S23wpa_supplicant S90kerneloops K15httpd K89rdisc S25netfs S90smolt K25sshd K90networkS26haldaemon S95atd K50netconsoleK95firstboot S26lm_sensors S96avahi-daemon K73winbind K99livesysS26udev-post S98cups K74nscd S00microcode_ctl S27NetworkManager S99local K75fuse S06cpuspeed S28portreserve ls /etc/rc3.d K01smartd K73winbind K90networkS14nfslock S55sshd K05saslauthd K73ypbind K90shorewall S15mdmonitor S58ntpd K10psacct K74lm_sensors K91capi S18rpcidmapd S80sendmail K10zvbid K74nscd K91wifiroamd S19rpcgssd S85gpm K20hddtemp K75fuse K95firstboot S22messagebus S90crond K20nfs K75ntpdate S00microcode_ctl S25netfs S90kerneloops K24irdaK76openvpn S06cpuspeed S26acpid S90smolt K36mysqld K84btseed S08ip6tables S26haldaemon S95atd K45arpwatchK84bttrack S08iptables S26pcscd S96avahi-daemon K50netconsole K85racoon S09isdn S26udev-post S97yum-updatesd K50snmpd K87multipathd S11auditd S27NetworkManager S98cups K50snmptrapd K87restorecond S12rsyslogS28portreserve S99anacron K50wpa_supplicant K89netplugd S13irqbalance S28setroubleshoot S99dnsmasq K69rpcsvcgssd K89rdiscS13rpcbindS50bluetooth S99local I don't see wpa_supplicant in there. [r...@aao ~]# service network status Configured devices: lo eth0 wlan0 Currently active devices: lo eth0 wifi0 wlan0 [r...@aao ~]# service NetworkManager status NetworkManager (pid 2240) is running... chkconfig --list network network 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off [r...@aao ~]# chkconfig --list NetworkManager NetworkManager 0:off 1:off 2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off Is 'network' running? I would have thought that 'Currently active devices:' means that it is. If it is, why? chkconfig says it isn't being activated. Anne If you are running the kernel-2.6.27 the correct driver will be ath5K_pci . If your running kernel-2.6.26 you'll have to use the madwifi driver, but sure to blacklist the driver originally supplied by Fedora. When kernel-2.6.27 came out it had the correct drivers fot the Atheros wireless card 2.6.26 did not. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Help -- can't SSH into my box
John Aldrich wrote: On Tuesday 06 January 2009, Stuart Sears wrote: Not wishing :) to open a massive can of worms (even though this probably will) but why do you hate it so much? Precisely because it interferes with so many other things. If SELinux ever gets to the point where it plays nice with other things, or at least has a nice, easy ignore this app sort of thing (like antivirus/anti-spyware apps in Windoze) I might reconsider it. Until then, I'm going to disable it whenever possible. I installed fail2ban and SELinux immediately threw up massive errors. I coudl understand that much better if it were some 3rd-party app, but something out of the default Fedora repos should be able to run w/o generating complaints from a security system. Fail2ban, especially, should be allowed to run w/o issue, due to the very nature of it. I installed fail2ban on a FC8 x86_64 box and selinux didn't cry one bit. You did get fail2ban off the Fedora repos ? -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: ftp question
adrian kok wrote: Hi When I change this file /etc/passwd from /home/userA to /ftp/userA eg: userA:x:502:502::/ftp/userA:/bin/bash After change this passwd file, I can't logon as ftp but ssh is fine Thank you Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com Are you getting any error messages in the ftp logs files? What are they? The log files (including syslog) are your friends in this case. Without seeing what the logs say, I'm not sure we can help debug. But, if I had my guess, it could be that the /ftp/UserA directory doesn't exist and so ftpd can't change to it. -- Frustra laborant quotquot se calculationibus fatigant pro inventione quadraturae circuli Mark Haney Sr. Systems Administrator ERC Broadband (828) 350-2415 Call (866) ERC-7110 for after hours support -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Fedora 10
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 08:20:12 Sachin Murudkar wrote: Hi all I am using fedora 10 I need a client vpn to connect to my off systems can any one guide me. I have yet to be able to get a VPN client working in Fedora 10 - for now I'm running CentOS inside of vmware workstation since the cisco vpn client for Linux compiles fine in CentOS -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
disabling selinux entirely
I thought that by setting selinux to disabled in the config file, I wouldn't be bothered by it's alerts any more. How do I stop SELinux from running, period? I don't want any alerts from SELinux regarding stuff I'm trying to install. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: HiJacking Threads Was: hostapd for Fedora 10
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: I presume that's because Gmane is a news posting service. Every genuine email client I know of supports In-Reply-To. You'll notice that posts on this list from Gmane users are usually out of their proper threads. Now you know why. Same thing happens with Yahoo apparently. Solution: avoid broken clients. Like yours? The mails I'm sending with KNode (an NNTP client) through GMane thread fine in the official archives at redhat.com (as well as obviously in KNode itself). (I've only just noticed your post Kevin, sorry.) I'm using the Gmail web interface for this list, basically as an experiment. If it's not threading properly, I'll consider changing (needless to say, it *does* thread properly on Gmail :-) However I see that Gmail does add the Message-ID and In-Reply-To headers, so are you sure the problem is at my end? poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: disabling selinux entirely
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 10:23:23 -0500 John Aldrich wrote: I thought that by setting selinux to disabled in the config file, I wouldn't be bothered by it's alerts any more. How do I stop SELinux from running, period? Did you reboot after doing that? As a belt suspenders kind of thing, I also set selinux=0 in the kernel options in grub.conf. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: ftp question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Are you using vsftpd with virtual users on the server? If so make sure you have the guest_user and no_priv option turned on in /etc/vsftpd/vsftpd.conf. Something like; nopriv_user=vsftpd chroot_local_user=YES guest_enable=YES guest_username=vsftpd local_root=/var/ftp/$USER adrian kok wrote: | Hi | | When I change this file /etc/passwd | | from /home/userA to /ftp/userA | | eg: | userA:x:502:502::/ftp/userA:/bin/bash | | After change this passwd file, I can't logon as ftp | | but ssh is fine | | Thank you | | | Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com - -- Jake Walters -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJZM+npjWgHK67SxERAi/3AKDGJCzh9s6/lhVMPVnzpQDbrVB9BgCfY9Pr JKzDfHM/RVl915RATCCJni0= =k+X7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: disabling selinux entirely
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 10:23 -0500, John Aldrich wrote: I thought that by setting selinux to disabled in the config file, I wouldn't be bothered by it's alerts any more. How do I stop SELinux from running, period? I don't want any alerts from SELinux regarding stuff I'm trying to install. SELINUX=disabled in /etc/selinux/config should have done the trick for you. Can you provide the output of: $ cat /etc/selinux/config $ dmesg | grep SELinux: -- Stephen Smalley National Security Agency -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: disabling selinux entirely
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 10:45 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote: On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 10:23:23 -0500 John Aldrich wrote: I thought that by setting selinux to disabled in the config file, I wouldn't be bothered by it's alerts any more. How do I stop SELinux from running, period? Did you reboot after doing that? As a belt suspenders kind of thing, I also set selinux=0 in the kernel options in grub.conf. Either one is supposed to work, so you shouldn't need both. -- Stephen Smalley National Security Agency -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Help -- can't SSH into my box
John Aldrich: From what I've read, it appeared that there was no way to *not* have selinux and that the best you could do was to have it run in permissive mode. I'll have to give that a shot. Tim: Incorrect. Whilst it's a recompile-everything-yourself customisation nightmare to rip it out of a system, you can disable it. Chris Snook: Not so. You can completely disable it with selinux=0 on the kernel command line. I think you need to read that again, all of it. Because your not so comment is completely out of place in replying to me. John incorrectly reckoned it couldn't actually be disabled and had correctly worked out that it can't be removed. I said that you can't remove it, short of making a completely custom system, but you *can* disable it. -- [...@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.9-73.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Network Manager, Firefox and more on FC10
Thanks, I didn't go looking for grub documentation, that is helpful. Since some of the boxes I administer are servers and dedicated to one task or another I have mostly defeated NetworkManager. I understand the logic for it, I just find it evil more often than not. Modifying startup scripts has been easier for me. On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 21:27 -0700, Craig White wrote: On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 20:50 -0600, David R Wilson wrote: Hello fellows, My .02 worth on several subjects. Network Manager since FC8 has been causing more grief to me than it is worth. It looks like it needs to look at the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ files for eth0 and if it is there don't screw things up (or at least prompt before destruction). NetworkManager intends to give 'userland' control over network connections whether they are wired, wireless, VPN, etc. Users that are accustomed to switching to superuser to manipulate things aren't likely to appreciate the value of this whereas network administrators know that these things are essential as they don't want users to have super user powers. The startup screen with the travelling bars near the bottom of the screen is a waste of time. There is a reason I want to see what the box is doing, and prefer the FC9 behavior. With FC9 I could hit a key and watch for problems. I didn't find any documentation on how to change that to the FC9 behavior. turn it off... edit /boot/grub/grub.conf and remove rhgb and quiet from the kernel boot parameters Firefox refuses to handle a bad certificate. That is all well and good, until your dealing with a firewall that doesn't have one that is valid. I didn't find a way to get beyond the complaint about the certificate. I had to grab my laptop with FC9 to deal with that problem. FC10 made doing anything with the https interface impossible. Firefox has made this a feature across the board and so FF 3 whether on Windows, Linux or Macintosh will always throw this safety alert when presented with certificates that are signed by untrusted authorities. Most people actually read their options and figure this out. This isn't a Fedora issue at all. True. I should have looked for a Firefox list. I figured some of those involved in that project were lurking here. Since you are struggling with the whole concept, see this... http://blog.ivanristic.com/2008/04/firefox-3-ssl-i.html Craig -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: disabling selinux entirely
On Wednesday 07 January 2009, Stephen Smalley wrote: On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 10:23 -0500, John Aldrich wrote: I thought that by setting selinux to disabled in the config file, I wouldn't be bothered by it's alerts any more. How do I stop SELinux from running, period? I don't want any alerts from SELinux regarding stuff I'm trying to install. SELINUX=disabled in /etc/selinux/config should have done the trick for you. Can you provide the output of: $ cat /etc/selinux/config $ dmesg | grep SELinux: Well, no I have not rebooted... Is this one of those things like a new kernel where you *have* to reboot? Really don't want to do that... maybe I can do it tonight when I'm actually at home to watch it.. (yeah... I'm paranoid! so sue me! G) -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: disabling selinux entirely
On Wednesday 07 January 2009, Stephen Smalley wrote: On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 10:23 -0500, John Aldrich wrote: I thought that by setting selinux to disabled in the config file, I wouldn't be bothered by it's alerts any more. How do I stop SELinux from running, period? I don't want any alerts from SELinux regarding stuff I'm trying to install. SELINUX=disabled in /etc/selinux/config should have done the trick for you. Can you provide the output of: $ cat /etc/selinux/config $ dmesg | grep SELinux: [j...@slave1 ~]$ cat /etc/selinux/config # This file controls the state of SELinux on the system. # SELINUX= can take one of these three values: # enforcing - SELinux security policy is enforced. # permissive - SELinux prints warnings instead of enforcing. # disabled - SELinux is fully disabled. SELINUX=disabled # SELINUXTYPE= type of policy in use. Possible values are: # targeted - Only targeted network daemons are protected. # strict - Full SELinux protection. SELINUXTYPE=targeted [j...@slave1 ~]$ dmesg | grep selinux SELinux: initialized (dev selinuxfs, type selinuxfs), uses genfs_contexts Note that I have not rebooted yet, if that's necessary. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Network Manager, Firefox and more on FC10
I looked for a way to make an exception. I didn't find it. With FC9 I had that as an option. This was immediately after a yum update. Dave On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 10:50 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 10:20 PM, David R Wilson da...@wwns.com wrote: Firefox refuses to handle a bad certificate. That is all well and good, until your dealing with a firewall that doesn't have one that is valid. I didn't find a way to get beyond the complaint about the certificate. I had to grab my laptop with FC9 to deal with that problem. FC10 made doing anything with the https interface impossible. It does not refuse to handle invalid certificates, it just pesters you to accept them. You can do so permanently or just for the current session, your choice. Look carefully at the popup dialog and click the magic buttons. poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Netbook wifi, wlan0 and inet6 address (F10)
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 15:09:01 Steven I Usdansky wrote: I'm running wpa_supplicant, but right now I'm on an unprotected network. network is not running: ~# service network status Configured devices: lo eth0 pan0 wlan0 Currently active devices: lo eth0 wmaster0 wlan0 OK - that looks as though mine is ok, then. ~# chkconfig --list network network 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off ~# chkconfig --list NetworkManager NetworkManager0:off 1:off 2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off As does that. Looks like you're using the madwifi driver. I haven't used it on my AA1 in Fedora as the ath5k driver in the newer kernels have been working for me. Nothing atheros-related is blacklisted in /etc/modprobe.d; /etc.modprobe.conf is empty. I've removed ndiswrapper and madwifi, leaving only the kernel driver. The blacklists for ath5k and ath5k-pci have disappeared. I've restarted NetworkManager, but still no joy. /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts# cat ifcfg-wlan0 # Atheros Communications Inc. AR242x 802.11abg Wireless PCI Express Adapter DEVICE=wlan0 HWADDR=00:22:69:92:f3:a3 Those lines match, too. /etc/sysconfig# cat network NETWORKING=yes HOSTNAME=Labradorite I have those plus NETWORKING_IPV6=no GATEWAY=192.168.0.1 Nothing particularly interesting that I can see in sysconfig, but I've included it just in case. Anne signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
