Fedora Weekly News #160
Fedora Weekly News Issue 160 Welcome to Fedora Weekly News Issue 160 for the week ending January 25th, 2009. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Issue160 Announcements notes upcoming events and deadlines for Fedora 11. PlanetFedora picks up on some communication problems in General and shares How To information on disabling the system bell. Developments rounds up some Fedora 11 Release Activity and synopsizes the debate around a Minimalist Root Login to X?. Infrastructure is back with some essential information on Fedora Security Policy. Artwork shares the Fedora 11 Release Banner. SecurityAdvisories provides a handy list of essential updates. Virtualization explains QEMU VM Channel Support. We are pleased to have an AskFedora QA covering the advisability of using the Ext4 Filesystem on Solid State Disks. Keep sending your questions! If you are interested in contributing to Fedora Weekly News, please see our 'join' page[1]. We welcome reader feedback: fedora-news-l...@redhat.com FWN Editorial Team: Pascal Calarco, Oisin Feeley, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/NewsProject/Join == Table of Contents == 1.1 Announcements 1.1.1 Technical Announcements 1.1.2 Fedora 11 1.1.3 Upcoming Events 1.2 Planet Fedora 1.2.1 General 1.2.2 How-To 1.2.3 Events 1.3 Developments 1.3.1 NFS Mounts and Caching DNS Nameserver Problem 1.3.2 Fedora 11 Alpha Release Activities 1.3.3 Minimalist Root Login to X ? 1.3.4 Fedora Geo Spin for USB Key and LiveCD 1.3.5 Draft Guidelines for Approving provenpackagers 1.3.6 Cloning of Bug Reports ? 1.4 Infrastructure 1.4.1 Why Puppet uses config instead of configs 1.4.2 Fedora Security Policy 1.4.3 Alpha Release Readiness 1.5 Artwork 1.5.1 Fedora 11 Release Banner 1.5.2 Artwork for the Education SIG 1.5.3 Wallpaper Survey 1.6 Security Advisories 1.6.1 Fedora 10 Security Advisories 1.6.2 Fedora 9 Security Advisories 1.7 Virtualization 1.7.1 Enterprise Management Tools List 1.7.1.1 Improved Device Configuration Support in virt-manager 1.7.2 Fedora Virtualization List 1.7.2.1 Fedora 11 Virtualization Features 1.7.2.2 Weekly Status Report 1.7.2.3 New Virtualization Wiki Pages 1.7.3 Libvirt List 1.7.3.1 QEMU VM Channel Support 1.8 Ask Fedora 1.8.1 Ext4 Filesystem on Solid State Disks == Announcements == In this section, we cover announcements from the Fedora Project. http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/ http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-announce/ Contributing Writer: Max Spevack === Technical Announcements === John Palmieri (on behalf of Luke Macken and Mairin Duffy) announced[1] the Moksha Project and the Fedora Community Project[2]. They have been consolidating the Fedora Infrastructure bits under one unified user interface, and have decided to split the efforts into two projects. Moksha is a platform for creating real-time collaborative web applications. It provides a set of Python and JavaScript API's that make it simple to create rich applications that can acquire, manipulate, and visualize data from external services. Fedora Community aims at being a portal interface for Fedora Project members to collaborate within and find information about the diverse Fedora universe. It is created from applications built on top of the Moksha platform. Fedora Community is assembled from a wide-ranging set of modules that integrates existing Fedora Infrastructure components such as koji, bodhi, FAS, and PkgDB. [1] http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2009-January/msg00015.html [2] http://johnp.fedorapeople.org/fedora-community/ Tom Spot Callaway announced[1] that the Fedora Packaging Committee has made some changes to the packaging guidelines. For details, read the full announcement linked below. [1] http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-announce/2009-January/msg7.html === Fedora 11 === The Fedora 11 Alpha freeze has passed[1], and we still have a few feature pages in need of an update. Several have not been updated for a month or more, according to John Poelstra. If these pages are not updated by January 28th, FESCo will be asked to drop the features from Fedora 11. [1] http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-announce/2009-January/msg8.html === Upcoming Events === Fedora will have a presence at several events in the next few weeks. Feel free to join us, February 6 - 8: Free and Open Source Developers European Meeting (FOSDEM) February 20 - 22: Southern California Linux Expo (SCALE) Also, people are encouraged to register for Fedora or JBoss.org related speaking slots at LinuxTag 2009. [1]
Re: Fedora 11 Alpha - release banner
Darren VanBuren ha scritto: On 1/24/2009 9:59 AM, Paolo Leoni wrote: Darren VanBuren ha scritto: On 1/24/2009 9:20 AM, Paolo Leoni wrote: Hi there, here you can find a simple Fedora 11 alpha release banner for the home page: http://pleoni.altervista.org/fedora11-banner-alpha5c.png http://pleoni.altervista.org/fedora11-banner-alpha5c.svg If it's good for you, I'll upload soon on the wiki. The 11 is kinda hard to see, try making it pure white. I apologize if I've started a new thread, I've mistaken the previous subject. the new try: http://pleoni.altervista.org/fedora11-banner-alpha5e.png http://pleoni.altervista.org/fedora11-banner-alpha5e.svg Much better. For your convenience, I've uploaded the banner on wiki: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Image:Fedora11alpha-banner.png https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Image:Fedora11alpha-banner.svg -- Paolo Leoni ~ http://pleoni.altervista.org GPG fingerprint: DAD1 6419 D42B 0B1C D9E1 A9CB 4587 4812 17F7 F764 ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: Updated EDU SIG Artwork Request
María Leandro wrote: Updated. http://tatica.fedorapeople.org/EduSig/thumb_wallpaper3a.png http://tatica.fedorapeople.org/EduSig/thumb_wallpaper3b.png http://tatica.fedorapeople.org/EduSig/thumb_wallpaper3c.png I think there is still some room for improvement, hope you don't mind (I got a few colleagues upset with my direct criticism at a photography course I am taking these days): - the rays of light are under the main circle of the sun but above its rays, I think they should be under both; - the yellow pencil has a shadow falling on the blue pencil and the blue pencil has a shadow falling over the magenta one but those shadows wall in a direction opposing the direction of the light. Other than that, my preference is for one of the first two images, having the pencils as a metaphor for education (the enlightenment from the light rays is also a good metaphor, but not so in your face). -- nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/ Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
(no subject)
i wanted to help you in designing please contact me.. ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: Updated EDU SIG Artwork Request
Nicu Buculei wrote: María Leandro wrote: Updated. http://tatica.fedorapeople.org/EduSig/thumb_wallpaper3a.png http://tatica.fedorapeople.org/EduSig/thumb_wallpaper3b.png http://tatica.fedorapeople.org/EduSig/thumb_wallpaper3c.png I think there is still some room for improvement, hope you don't mind (I got a few colleagues upset with my direct criticism at a photography course I am taking these days): - the rays of light are under the main circle of the sun but above its rays, I think they should be under both; - the yellow pencil has a shadow falling on the blue pencil and the blue pencil has a shadow falling over the magenta one but those shadows wall in a direction opposing the direction of the light. Other than that, my preference is for one of the first two images, having the pencils as a metaphor for education (the enlightenment from the light rays is also a good metaphor, but not so in your face). Yeah, I agree! I really like the first and the second one, though I'm still not sure, which one more - I like both. Thanks again! :) --Sebastian ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: Alpha Release Readiness
So far I have not heard from anyone from the Art team. I need a representative to add to the call-in email ASAP. John John Poelstra wrote: With the Alpha Release for Fedora 11 scheduled for Tuesday, February 3, 2009, this means it is time to meet again with representatives from each of the teams to have our release readiness meeting. We usually have this meeting at 18:00 UTC (13:00 EST) the Wednesday before, which means next Wednesday, January 28, 2009, is the day. On Monday, January 26, 2009, I will be sending out the dial-in information and a meeting reminder to all the attendees. In the meantime I need to know who will be representing your group at these meetings for the Fedora 11 meetings. Usually this is the designated team leader, but I wanted to ask to make sure you coordinate within your team to make sure someone comes. When responding to this list, please CC me so that I am sure to see the reply. This message is going out to the respective mailings lists for these groups: Ambassadors Artwork/Design Documentation FESCo Infrastructure Marketing Quality Release Engineering Translation Websites Thanks, John ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: Alpha Release Readiness
Hi John. John Poelstra wrote: So far I have not heard from anyone from the Art team. I need a representative to add to the call-in email ASAP. Whoops, I'll be happy to represent the design team at the next release readiness meeting. ~m ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
[Bug 481478] Renaming review: andika-fonts ⇒ sil-andika-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481478 Sarantis Paskalis paska...@di.uoa.gr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paska...@di.uoa.gr AssignedTo|nott...@redhat.com |nicolas.mail...@laposte.net Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Sarantis Paskalis paska...@di.uoa.gr 2009-01-26 06:45:39 EDT --- Upgrade path works through Obsoletes: Provides: not provided (andika-fonts is not required by any package in the repo, so it is ok) (Also done a quick QA review, did not find anything questionable). APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481476] Renaming review: charis-fonts ⇒ sil-charis-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481476 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-26 07:34:11 EDT --- Doh, will fix of course before import (can you review the renaming of edrip too please?) New Package CVS Request === Package Name: sil-charis-fonts Short Description: A serif smart font similar to Bitstream Charter Owners: nim kevin roozbeh Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481494] Renaming review: unikurd-web-font ⇒ kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-26 07:36:05 EDT --- (please do not forget your cvs request now) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481494] Renaming review: unikurd-web-font ⇒ kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-26 08:47:18 EDT --- (and the usual CCs please, see bug #481478 for an example) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481494] Renaming review: unikurd-web-font ⇒ kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494 --- Comment #7 from Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com 2009-01-26 09:01:32 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts Owners: mnowak Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes rename unikurd-web-font ⇒ kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts just for Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481472] Renaming review: edrip-fonts ⇒ ap anov-edrip-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481472 Sarantis Paskalis paska...@di.uoa.gr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paska...@di.uoa.gr AssignedTo|nott...@redhat.com |nicolas.mail...@laposte.net Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Sarantis Paskalis paska...@di.uoa.gr 2009-01-26 09:33:50 EDT --- Upgrade path works through Obsoletes: Provides: not provided (edrip-fonts is not required by any package in the repo, so it is ok) The license patch in the spec file is a bit mysterious, so I had to dig CVS history to see why it was there in the first place. Could you please restore the spec file comments explaining the need for this patch? Or alternatively (if you don't want to litter the spec file with comments) put it in another FILE mentioned in the spec? No other comments, so: APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481472] Renaming review: edrip-fonts ⇒ ap anov-edrip-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481472 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-26 10:11:27 EDT --- I should probably check with Spot if the patch is still needed, upstream did imporve its licensing documentation lately Anyway: New Package CVS Request === Package Name: apanov-edrip-fonts Short Description: A decorative contrast sans-serif font Owners: nim Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481532] luit crashes and burns.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481532 Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||fedora-fonts-bugs-l...@redh ||at.com Component|xorg-x11-apps |xorg-x11-fonts AssignedTo|xgl-ma...@redhat.com|sandm...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #24 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-01-26 12:28:53 EDT --- Examining the fonts reveals that there are 33 distinct font families here. Do I really need to create 33 subpackages or will feta, feta-alphabet, feta-braces and parmesan suffice? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #25 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-01-26 12:38:54 EDT --- If you'd ask me, it would be enough just to have feta and parmesan, 2 subpackages. Or maybe just one type1 subpackage. But Nicolas is the boss here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477408] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477408 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-01-26 12:41:52 EDT --- Looks OK to me. Once it's built, I'll finish fixing moodle. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #26 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-26 13:09:25 EDT --- You can clearly put the different sizes of foo-XX fonts together As to the different feta elements, you'll have to ask Jonathan Underwood or another TEXie. google-droid-sans has some rules to consolidate different font families in a single one fontconfig-side, you should also play with them. This stuff screams 'legacy that should have been converted to a few big OTF fonts logn ago' to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jonathan.underw...@gmail.co ||m --- Comment #27 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-01-26 13:31:16 EDT --- Jonathan, any thoughts on how to proceed here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481472] Renaming review: edrip-fonts ⇒ ap anov-edrip-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481472 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||nott...@redhat.com Component|distribution|Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481478] Renaming review: andika-fonts ⇒ sil-andika-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481478 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||nott...@redhat.com Component|distribution|Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|nicolas.mail...@laposte.net Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nicolas.mail...@laposte.net |s...@lank.es Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-26 15:59:54 EDT --- You have the wrong source archive and the review link in your wiki page is not pointing here. The rest of the package is perfect and you're an experienced packager so I'll approve anyway but do make sure you push the right font in koji. ⧪⧪⧪ APPROVED ⧪⧪⧪ You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477408] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477408 Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ON_QA Fixed In Version||khmeros-fonts-5.0-5.fc11 --- Comment #10 from Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com 2009-01-26 16:02:11 EDT --- 5.0-5 just built in Rawhide. Let me know if there are ongoing issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 Sven Lankes s...@lank.es changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Sven Lankes s...@lank.es 2009-01-26 16:46:53 EDT --- Thank you for another font review, Nicolas. I have already fixed the issues you noted and uploaded an updated spec. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: dustin-domestic-manners-fonts Short Description: Handwriting font by Dustin Norlander Owners: slankes Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481494] Renaming review: unikurd-web-font ⇒ kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-26 17:14:40 EDT --- Please include all the info you would with a new package request moving forward? (It's a pain to have to look up the Short description everytime) cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 476427] [te_IN] - Consonant+Virama+Consonant+Virama+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476427 --- Comment #7 from Padmanabhan V. K. bugzillas+padremovethi...@gmail.com 2009-01-26 17:18:02 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330034) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330034) untested patch for Lohit-Telugu.sfd I hand edited http://fedorahosted.org/lohit/browser/trunk/Lohit-Telugu.sfd for my suggested changes and a few more changes and created the attached patch. The changes made are: 1. Every GlyphClass: line is fixed to reflect if the glyph is a mark (4) or a ligature (3). [For the specific issue at hand, changing GlyphClass: for all below base forms (*.blwf glyphs got by substituting those, glyph471, U0C24_U0C4D.blwf_U0C30_U0C4D.blwf.blws glyph473) is enough.] 2. Lookup flags of Above Base Substitutions in Telugu lookup 1 and Halant Forms in Telugu lookup 317 is changed from 0 to 8 to ignore marks. [For the specific issue at hand, the second change is enough.] 3. What seem to be typos in Ligature2: lines are fixed -- U0C38_U0C4D.haln U0C1F U0C30_U0C4D.blwf - U0C38_U0C4D.haln U0C24 U0C30_U0C4D.blwf and U0C37_U0C4D.haln U0C24 U0C30_U0C4D.blwf - U0C37_U0C4D.haln U0C1F U0C30_U0C4D.blwf. [These are of course unrelated to this bug. The modifications are to Ligature2: lines for the glyphs U0C38_U0C24_U0C4D.blwf_U0C30_U0C4D.blwf.blws and U0C37_U0C1F_U0C4D.blwf_U0C30_U0C4D.blwf.blws.] 4. What seem to be erroneous akhn rules for consonant sequences without halanths -- U0C38 U0C24 U0C30 U0C40 - U0C38_U0C4D.haln U0C24_U0C40.abvs U0C30_U0C4D.blwf and U0C37 U0C1F U0C30 U0C40 - U0C37_U0C4D.haln U0C1F_U0C40.abvs U0C30_U0C4D.blwf. [These are also unrelated to this bug. The modifications are to Ligature2: lines for the glyphs U0C38_U0C24_U0C30_U0C40.akhn and U0C37_U0C1F_U0C30_U0C40.akhn. The new sequences I have put are inspired by the akhn rules fixed in step 3 above.] The extra changes in 1 and 2 allow better rendering for rendering engines that do not position the base consonant and the matra immediately next to each other. E.g. before the change in http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/pango?limit_changes=100view=revisionrevision=2107 Pothana2000 rendered consonant + ai-matra (0x0C48) correctly as it ignored the intervening ai length mark (0x0C56) when combining the consonant with the e-matra (0x0C46). These changes will allow Lohit Telugu to also handle this case with renderers other than pango. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-26 17:29:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 429901] [te_IN] upon joined character the halant was not rendering properly in te-IN
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429901 Padmanabhan V. K. bugzillas+padremovethi...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzillas+padremovethi...@g ||mail.com --- Comment #4 from Padmanabhan V. K. bugzillas+padremovethi...@gmail.com 2009-01-26 17:29:41 EDT --- Using ZWJ as in bug 451203 for the combination U+0c2f U+0c4d U+0c30 U+0c4d, pango uses the character sequence U+0c2f U+0c4d U+0c30 U+0c4d U+200d as is instead of the reordered sequence U+0c2f U+0c30 U+0c4d U+0c4d. With the former sequence the glyphs added are U+0c2f+halanth below-base-U+0c30 U+200d whereas with the latter we get U+0c2f below-base-U+0c30 U+0c4d followed by substitution of below-base-U+0c30 with a wider glyph due to the context of U+0c2f. Now the rendering of U+0c2f wide-below-base-U+0c30 U+0c4d can be fixed as suggested in bug 476427 to get U+0c2f+halanth wide-below-base-U+0c30 which isn't possible with ZWJ. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-26 17:39:15 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481478] Renaming review: andika-fonts ⇒ sil-andika-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481478 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-26 17:48:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: sil-andika-fonts Short Description: A font for literacy and beginning readers Owners: nim Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes Andika is a sans serif, Unicode-compliant font designed especially for literacy use, taking into account the needs of beginning readers. The focus is on clear, easy-to-perceive letterforms that will not be readily confused with one another. A sans serif font is preferred by some literacy personnel for teaching people to read. Its forms are simpler and less cluttered than those of most serif fonts. For years, literacy workers have had to make do with fonts that were not really suitable for beginning readers and writers. In some cases, literacy specialists have had to tediously assemble letters from a variety of fonts in order to get all of the characters they need for their particular language project, resulting in confusing and unattractive publications. Andika addresses those issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481409] Review Request: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts - A stylized font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: 2bc-fonts - |Review Request: |A stylized font |chisholm-to-be-continued-fo ||nts - A stylized font Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-26 17:49:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477476] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477476 Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Fixed In Version||kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts-20 ||020502-2.fc11 --- Comment #4 from Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com 2009-01-26 17:47:45 EDT --- Fixed here: kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts-20020502-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481472] Renaming review: edrip-fonts ⇒ ap anov-edrip-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481472 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-26 17:50:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: apanov-edrip-fonts Short Description: A decorative contrast sans-serif font Owners: nim Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes Edrip font is a contrast sans-serif font. It is based on the Teams font released on 2000 by TopTeam Co. Edrip contains symbols for basic Cyrillic and Latin alphabets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481476] Renaming review: charis-fonts ⇒ sil-charis-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481476 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-26 17:50:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: sil-charis-fonts Short Description: A serif smart font similar to Bitstream Charter Owners: nim kevin roozbeh Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes Charis SIL provides glyphs for a wide range of Latin and Cyrillic characters. Charis is similar to Bitstream Charter, one of the first fonts designed specifically for laser printers. It is highly readable and holds up well in less-than-ideal reproduction environments. It also has a full set of styles — regular, italic, bold, bold italic — and so is more useful in general publishing than Doulos SIL. Charis is a serif proportionally spaced font optimized for readability in long printed documents. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481472] Renaming review: edrip-fonts ⇒ ap anov-edrip-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481472 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-26 17:56:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481472] Renaming review: edrip-fonts ⇒ ap anov-edrip-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481472 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481476] Renaming review: charis-fonts ⇒ sil-charis-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481476 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-26 17:59:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481478] Renaming review: andika-fonts ⇒ sil-andika-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481478 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-26 18:01:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,1.12,1.13
Author: cchance
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17869
Modified Files:
baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec
Log Message:
* Tue Jan 27 2009 Caius Chance ccha...@redhat.com - 2.2-17.fc11
- Resolves: rhbz#477332
- Fixed obsoletion of baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts.
Index: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.12
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -r1.12 -r1.13
--- baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec 22 Jan 2009 05:49:22 - 1.12
+++ baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec 26 Jan 2009 23:56:12 - 1.13
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
Name: %{fontname}-fonts
Version:2.2
-Release:16%{?dist}
+Release:17%{?dist}
Summary:Free Korean TrueType fonts
Group: User Interface/X
@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@
Group: User Interface/X
Conflicts: fonts-korean 2.2-5
Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko 1.0.11-33, fonts-korean 2.2-5
+Obsoletes: baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts 2.2-16
%description -n %{fontname}-fonts-common
%common_desc
@@ -151,6 +152,10 @@
%__rm -rf %{buildroot}
%changelog
+* Tue Jan 27 2009 Caius Chance ccha...@redhat.com - 2.2-17.fc11
+- Resolves: rhbz#477332
+- Fixed obsoletion of baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts.
+
* Thu Jan 22 2009 Caius Chance ccha...@redhat.com - 2.2-16.fc11
- Resolves: rhbz#477332
- Refined dependencies.
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,1.13,1.14
Author: cchance
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18491
Modified Files:
baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec
Log Message:
corrected -common-fonts obsoletion version number
Index: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.13
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -r1.13 -r1.14
--- baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec 26 Jan 2009 23:56:12 - 1.13
+++ baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec 27 Jan 2009 00:01:04 - 1.14
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@
Group: User Interface/X
Conflicts: fonts-korean 2.2-5
Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko 1.0.11-33, fonts-korean 2.2-5
-Obsoletes: baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts 2.2-16
+Obsoletes: baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts 2.2-17
%description -n %{fontname}-fonts-common
%common_desc
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481070] Review Request: ctan-musixtex-fonts - Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-26 20:49:17 EDT --- ctan-musixtex-fonts-1.13-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481070] Review Request: ctan-musixtex-fonts - Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481070] Review Request: ctan-musixtex-fonts - Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-26 20:53:18 EDT --- ctan-musixtex-fonts-1.13-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-26 20:53:10 EDT --- dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-26 20:51:48 EDT --- dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel apanov-edrip-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 apanov-edrip-fonts-license.patch, NONE, 1.1 apanov-edrip-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 so
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25060/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
apanov-edrip-fonts-fontconfig.conf
apanov-edrip-fonts-license.patch apanov-edrip-fonts.spec
import.log
Log Message:
edrip-fonts â apanov-edrip-fonts
--- NEW FILE apanov-edrip-fonts-fontconfig.conf ---
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM ../fonts.dtd
fontconfig
alias
familyfantasy/family
prefer
familyEdrip/family
/prefer
/alias
alias
familyEdrip/family
default
familyfantasy/family
/default
/alias
alias binding=same
familyTeams/family
accept
familyEdrip/family
/accept
/alias
/fontconfig
apanov-edrip-fonts-license.patch:
--- NEW FILE apanov-edrip-fonts-license.patch ---
--- edrip-src-20080317.orig/OFL.txt 2008-03-08 04:31:55.0 +0100
+++ edrip-src-20080317/OFL.txt 2008-03-27 00:04:29.0 +0100
@@ -5,6 +5,36 @@
This license is copied below, and is also available with a FAQ at:
http://scripts.sil.org/OFL
+The Font Software incorporates work covered by the following copyright and
+permission notice:
+
+%
+The Teams font without an explicit copyright is covered by the following
+copyright/license:
+
+Copyright (C) 1994-2000 The TopTeam Co. All Rights Reserved.
+
+Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
+of this software and associated documentation files (the Software), to deal
+in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
+to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
+copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
+furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
+
+The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
+copies or substantial portions of the Software.
+
+THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED AS IS, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
+IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
+FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL
+TOPTEAM CO. BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN
+ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION
+WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
+
+Except as contained in this notice, the name of TopTeam Co. shall not be used
+in advertising or otherwise to promote the sale, use or other dealings in this
+Software without prior written authorization from TopTeam Co.
+%
---
SIL OPEN FONT LICENSE Version 1.1 - 26 February 2007
--- NEW FILE apanov-edrip-fonts.spec ---
%define fontname apanov-edrip
%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
%define archivename edrip-src-%{version}
Name:%{fontname}-fonts
Version: 20081007
Release: 3%{?dist}
Summary: A decorative contrast sans-serif font
Group: User Interface/X
License: OFL
URL: ftp://ftp.dvo.ru/pub/Font/%{fontname}/
Source0: %{url}%{archivename}.tar.bz2
Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf
Patch0:%{name}-license.patch
BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XX)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel
BuildRequires: xgridfit
BuildRequires: fontforge
Requires: fontpackages-filesystem
Obsoletes: edrip-fonts 20081007-3
%description
Edrip font is a contrast sans-serif font. It is based on the Teams font
released on 2000 by TopTeam Co. Edrip contains symbols for basic Cyrillic and
Latin alphabets.
%prep
%setup -q -c
%patch0 -p1
%build
make %{?_smp_mflags} all
%install
rm -fr %{buildroot}
install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}
ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf}
%clean
rm -fr %{buildroot}
%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf
%doc *.txt README
%dir %{_fontdir}
%changelog
* Sun Jan 25 2009 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
- 20081007-3
⺠renamed to âapanov-edrip-fontsâ to apply Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming
* Sun Nov 23 2008 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
- 20081007-2
ᤠârpm-fontsâ renamed to âfontpackagesâ
* Fri Nov 14 2008 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
- 20081007-1
⤠Rebuild using new « rpm-fonts »
* Wed Sep 3 2008 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
- 20080826-2
â Rebuild with pre-F10-freeze fontforge
* Mon Sep 1 2008 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
- 20080826-1
Ô¡ Still more extended cyrillic
rpms/sil-andika-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 sil-andika-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 sil-andika-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-andika-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25698/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log sil-andika-fonts-fontconfig.conf
sil-andika-fonts.spec
Log Message:
andika-fonts â sil-andika-fonts
--- NEW FILE import.log ---
sil-andika-fonts-1_0-4_fc11:HEAD:sil-andika-fonts-1.0-4.fc11.src.rpm:1233039407
--- NEW FILE sil-andika-fonts-fontconfig.conf ---
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM ../fonts.dtd
fontconfig
alias
familysans-serif/family
prefer
familyAndika/family
/prefer
/alias
alias
familyAndika/family
default
familysans-serif/family
/default
/alias
/fontconfig
--- NEW FILE sil-andika-fonts.spec ---
%define fontname sil-andika
%define fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf
# Someday SIL will release sanely named archives
%define archivename AndikaBasicR_10
Name:%{fontname}-fonts
Version: 1.0
Release: 4%{?dist}
Summary: A font for literacy and beginning readers
Group: User Interface/X
License: OFL
URL: http://scripts.sil.org/Andika
# Actual download URL
#
http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/render_download.php?site_id=nrsiformat=filemedia_id=%{archivename}filename=%{archivename}.zip
Source0: %{archivename}.zip
Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf
BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XX)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel
Requires: fontpackages-filesystem
Obsoletes: andika-fonts 1.0-4
%description
Andika is a sans serif, Unicode-compliant font designed especially for
literacy use, taking into account the needs of beginning readers. The focus is
on clear, easy-to-perceive letterforms that will not be readily confused with
one another.
A sans serif font is preferred by some literacy personnel for teaching people
to read. Its forms are simpler and less cluttered than those of most serif
fonts. For years, literacy workers have had to make do with fonts that were
not really suitable for beginning readers and writers. In some cases, literacy
specialists have had to tediously assemble letters from a variety of fonts in
order to get all of the characters they need for their particular language
project, resulting in confusing and unattractive publications. Andika
addresses those issues.
%prep
%setup -q -n %{archivename}
# Text files sanitization
for txt in *.txt ; do
# Unicode compliant, check
iconv -f WINDOWS-1252 -t UTF-8 -o $txt.1 $txt
fold -s $txt.1 $txt.2
sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.2
touch -r $txt $txt.2
mv $txt.2 $txt
rm $txt.1
done
%build
%install
rm -fr %{buildroot}
install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}
ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf}
%clean
rm -fr %{buildroot}
%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf
%doc *.txt
%dir %{_fontdir}
%changelog
* Sun Jan 25 2009 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
- 1.0-4
⺠renamed to âsil-andika-fontsâ to apply Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming
* Sun Nov 23 2008 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
- 1.0-3
ᤠârpm-fontsâ renamed to âfontpackagesâ
* Fri Nov 14 2008 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
- 1.0-2
⤠Rebuild using new « rpm-fonts »
* Tue Jun 24 2008 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
- 1.0-1
á¹ Initial packaging
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-andika-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore 26 Jan 2009 23:02:25 - 1.1
+++ .cvsignore 27 Jan 2009 06:57:20 - 1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+AndikaBasicR_10.zip
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-andika-fonts/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources 26 Jan 2009 23:02:25 - 1.1
+++ sources 27 Jan 2009 06:57:21 - 1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+1a8b028ccea53e93fc4f34ca226f2b02 AndikaBasicR_10.zip
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481476] Renaming review: charis-fonts ⇒ sil-charis-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481476 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481478] Renaming review: andika-fonts ⇒ sil-andika-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481478 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 481478, which changed state. Bug 481478 Summary: Renaming review: andika-fonts ⇒ sil-andika-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481478 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 481476, which changed state. Bug 481476 Summary: Renaming review: charis-fonts ⇒ sil-charis-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481476 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 481472, which changed state. Bug 481472 Summary: Renaming review: edrip-fonts ⇒ apanov-edrip-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481472 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 sil-charis-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 sil-charis-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29227/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log sil-charis-fonts-fontconfig.conf
sil-charis-fonts.spec
Log Message:
charis-fonts â sil-charis-fonts
--- NEW FILE import.log ---
sil-charis-fonts-4_104-6_fc11:HEAD:sil-charis-fonts-4.104-6.fc11.src.rpm:1233040224
--- NEW FILE sil-charis-fonts-fontconfig.conf ---
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM ../fonts.dtd
fontconfig
alias
familyserif/family
prefer
familyCharis SIL/family
/prefer
/alias
alias
familyCharis SIL/family
default
familyserif/family
/default
/alias
alias binding=same
familyBitstream Charter/family
accept
familyCharis SIL/family
/accept
/alias
alias binding=same
familyCharis SIL Literacy/family
accept
familyCharis SIL/family
/accept
/alias
/fontconfig
--- NEW FILE sil-charis-fonts.spec ---
%define fontname sil-charis
%define fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf
%define archivename CharisSIL
Name:%{fontname}-fonts
Version: 4.104
Release: 6%{?dist}
Summary: A serif smart font similar to Bitstream Charter
Group: User Interface/X
License: OFL
URL: http://scripts.sil.org/CharisSILFont
# Actual download URL
#
http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/render_download.php?site_id=nrsiformat=filemedia_id=%{archivename}.zipfilename=%{archivename}%{version}.zip
Source0: %{archivename}%{version}.zip
Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf
BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XX)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel
Requires: fontpackages-filesystem
Obsoletes: charis-fonts 4.104-5
%description
Charis SIL provides glyphs for a wide range of Latin and Cyrillic characters.
Charis is similar to Bitstream Charter, one of the first fonts designed
specifically for laser printers. It is highly readable and holds up well in
less-than-ideal reproduction environments. It also has a full set of styles
â regular, italic, bold, bold italic â and so is more useful in general
publishing than Doulos SIL. Charis is a serif proportionally spaced font
optimized for readability in long printed documents.
%prep
%setup -q -n %{archivename}
for txt in *.txt ; do
fold -s $txt $txt.new
sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new
touch -r $txt $txt.new
mv $txt.new $txt
done
%build
%install
rm -fr %{buildroot}
install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}
ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf}
%clean
rm -fr %{buildroot}
%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf
%doc *.txt *.pdf
%dir %{_fontdir}
%changelog
* Tue Jan 27 2009 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
- 4.104-6
⺠renamed to âsil-charis-fontsâ to apply Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming
* Sun Nov 23 2008 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
- 4.104-4
ᤠârpm-fontsâ renamed to âfontpackagesâ
* Fri Nov 14 2008 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
- 4.104-3
⤠Rebuild using new « rpm-fonts »
* Fri Jul 11 2008 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
- 4.104-2
â Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup
* Sun May 18 2008 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
- 4.104-1
⧠New Unicode 5.1 compliant release, with some glyphs moved out of PUA
* Sat Nov 3 2007 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
⺠4.100-5
â Sync with guidelines
â fix config file misplacement
* Thu Nov 1 2007 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
⺠4.100-4
â Sync with guidelines
â new fontconfig aliasing syntax
* Tue Aug 28 2007 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
⺠4.100-3
â Sync with dejavu spec
â Licence++
* Thu Jun 21 2007 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
⺠4.100-2
â Fix URL (bug #245101)
* Thu May 31 2007 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
⺠4.100-1
â add fontconfig setup file
â make spec closer to the dejavu one to simplify maintenance
* Thu Nov 09 2006 Roozbeh Pournader rooz...@farsiweb.info - 4.0.02-3
- Remove ghost-ed fontconfig cache files
* Tue Sep 19 2006 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com - 4.0.02-2
- Rebuild for fc6
- Add dist tag
* Sat Feb 18 2006 Roozbeh Pournader rooz...@farsiweb.info - 4.0.02-1
- Initial packaging, based on gentium-fonts
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore 26 Jan 2009 23:00:06 - 1.1
+++ .cvsignore 27 Jan 2009 07:14:18 - 1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+CharisSIL4.104.zip
Index: sources
Re: Fedora-fonts-list Digest, Vol 16, Issue 14
Our wishlist stood at 56 entries for last report. It has now reached the 76 entries watermark. The current fonts packagers are clearly unable to cope with Fedora demands, fresh blood is needed before it moves into 3-digits land. Well then in that case, you may be happy to hear that you have a new fonts packager: me. ^.^ My name is Stephen, and I'm a student in the LUX program at Seneca College in Toronto Canada, studying Linux. For a class project, I will be packaging up as many fonts as I can, and (hopefully) getting them into Fedora. I'm a little late in getting into contact with the community, but hey, better late than never! To start off, I've already got one font packaged up and ready for review (Epigrafica - I had a couple others, but I see they're no longer on the wishlist), but I'm not quite sure where to go from here. I'd like to get these started into the review process, but I've never done that before so... yeah, what do I do next? I'm mostly clear on the technical details of making the packages, but I'm unfamiliar with the whole process for getting the package approved and whatnot. If someone could point me in the next direction, that would be great! Also, I'm on IRC a lot, is there an IRC channel where I could ask questions specifically related to fonts-packaging? You can reach me at scarter4 AT learn DOT senecac DOT on DOT ca or, reply to this address. Stephen ___ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
Re: DRBD
On Jan 15, 2009, at 8:17 AM, Mike McGrath wrote: I have a small research project if someone is interested in taking it up. I want to know of Debian, Ubuntu, SuSE and the other major distributions, How many of them include DRBD by default or via some official channel. Also, of people on this list, how many of you use DRBD, in what capacity and what do you think of it? I love it. I use it in both active/active and active/passive modes. Saves me from having to hook some of my systems up to our SAN. Ryan -- Ryan Ordway E-mail: rord...@oregonstate.edu Unix Systems Administrator rord...@library.oregonstate.edu OSU Libraries, Corvallis, OR 97331Office: Valley Library #4657 ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Change request
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009, Mike McGrath wrote:
I'd like to
diff --git a/manifests/servergroups/phx.pp
b/manifests/servergroups/phx.pp
index 312b378..038caea 100644
--- a/manifests/servergroups/phx.pp
+++ b/manifests/servergroups/phx.pp
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ class phx {
}
host { 'admin.fedoraproject.org':
ip = '10.8.32.121',
+alias = ['mirrors.fedoraproject.org',]
}
host { 'cvs.fedoraproject.org':
ip = '10.8.34.151',
Can I get 2 +1's?
Actually I want that to go to an external IP so it'd be more like:
host { 'mirrors.fedoraproject.org':
ip = '66.35.62.166',
}
-Mike
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Change request
On 2009-01-26 03:53:46 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
I'd like to
diff --git a/manifests/servergroups/phx.pp
b/manifests/servergroups/phx.pp
index 312b378..038caea 100644
--- a/manifests/servergroups/phx.pp
+++ b/manifests/servergroups/phx.pp
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ class phx {
}
host { 'admin.fedoraproject.org':
ip = '10.8.32.121',
+alias = ['mirrors.fedoraproject.org',]
}
host { 'cvs.fedoraproject.org':
ip = '10.8.34.151',
Can I get 2 +1's?
+1
Thanks,
Ricky
pgptVHeMaKxbL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Change request
On 2009-01-26 03:56:06 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
Actually I want that to go to an external IP so it'd be more like:
host { 'mirrors.fedoraproject.org':
ip = '66.35.62.166',
}
+1 to this, then - Mike said it's so that mirrormanager will see PHX's
IP and redirect to the internal mirror.
Thanks,
Ricky
pgpMndBJgsQEq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Change request
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 15:56 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009, Mike McGrath wrote:
I'd like to
diff --git a/manifests/servergroups/phx.pp
b/manifests/servergroups/phx.pp
index 312b378..038caea 100644
--- a/manifests/servergroups/phx.pp
+++ b/manifests/servergroups/phx.pp
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ class phx {
}
host { 'admin.fedoraproject.org':
ip = '10.8.32.121',
+alias = ['mirrors.fedoraproject.org',]
}
host { 'cvs.fedoraproject.org':
ip = '10.8.34.151',
Can I get 2 +1's?
Actually I want that to go to an external IP so it'd be more like:
host { 'mirrors.fedoraproject.org':
ip = '66.35.62.166',
}
+1.
-sv
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Automating hosted projects?
Hi Infrastructure team, Not sure if this inquiry belongs here or on websites, but I'll start here. Personally my experience has been that the Fedora admins act on requests for Fedora Hosted projects requests very quickly. Some potential contributors may want or need more instantaneous results, and I would hate to see folks going to somewhere like Google Code if we can keep their projects more open and transparent (and portable) to the community. Does the team have any sense as to whether we could further automate the Fedora Hosted project creation process? -- Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug pgpJeLTl0UoQ2.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: rpms/kernel/devel linux-2.6-defaults-intel_iommu-off.patch, NONE, 1.1 kernel.spec, 1.1225, 1.1226
Hi Kyle, On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 18:49 +, Kyle McMartin wrote: * Fri Jan 23 2009 Kyle McMartin k...@redhat.com - disable intel_iommu by default (enable with intel_iommu=on) Why so? We're pretty much guaranteed that no-one will enable this ... do we know of specific hardware that this is breaking? One of the major virt features in F11 needs this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/KVM_PCI_Device_Assignment Thanks, Mark. ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: [PATCH] kernel: only build kernel-headers on ARM
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:06:41AM +0530, Kedar Sovani wrote: I applied it, but there wasn't enough in config-arm to make it build. Rather than just ignore it, I filled in some of the blanks that seemed relevant. I have no idea what your specific machtype is, but I assumed the versatile thingy so I turned things on/off as Kconfig help text seemed to indicate were for this platform. Here's a diff, shout or plz send a diff against devel/config-arm if anything seems out of place to you folks. cheers, Kyle Index: config-arm === RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/kernel/devel/config-arm,v retrieving revision 1.1 diff -u -p -r1.1 config-arm --- config-arm 26 Jan 2009 07:19:13 - 1.1 +++ config-arm 26 Jan 2009 20:23:45 - @@ -5,6 +5,31 @@ CONFIG_SYS_SUPPORTS_APM_EMULATION=y CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y CONFIG_ARCH_VERSATILE=y +CONFIG_ARCH_VERSATILE_PB=y +CONFIG_MACH_VERSATILE_AB=y + +# CONFIG_CPU_ICACHE_DISABLE is not set +# CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_DISABLE is not set +# CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH is not set +# CONFIG_CPU_CACHE_ROUND_ROBIN is not set + +CONFIG_ZBOOT_ROM_TEXT=0 +CONFIG_ZBOOT_ROM_BSS=0 + +# CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL is not set + +CONFIG_ATAGS_PROC=y + +# CONFIG_FPE_NWFPE is not set +CONFIG_FPE_FASTFPE=y +CONFIG_VFP=y + +CONFIG_PM=y +# CONFIG_PM_DEBUG is not set +# CONFIG_PM_TRACE is not set +CONFIG_SUSPEND=y +# CONFIG_PM_TEST_SUSPEND is not set +CONFIG_APM_EMULATION=y CONFIG_ARM_THUMB=y @@ -13,3 +38,56 @@ CONFIG_OABI_COMPAT=y CONFIG_CMDLINE=console=ttyAM0,115200 root=/dev/sda1 rootdelay=20 +CONFIG_NO_HZ=y +CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=y + +# CONFIG_CPU_IDLE is not set + +CONFIG_LEDS=y +CONFIG_LEDS_CPU=y + +CONFIG_MTD_AFS_PARTS=y +CONFIG_MTD_ARM_INTEGRATOR=y +CONFIG_MTD_IMPA7=y + +CONFIG_AX88796=m +CONFIG_AX88796_93CX6=y +CONFIG_SMC91X=m +CONFIG_DM9000=m +CONFIG_DM9000_DEBUGLEVEL=4 +# CONFIG_DM9000_FORCE_SIMPLE_PHY_POLL is not set +CONFIG_SMC911X=m +CONFIG_SMSC911X=m + +CONFIG_SERIO_AMBAKMI=m + +CONFIG_SERIAL_AMBA_PL011=y +CONFIG_SERIAL_AMBA_PL011_CONSOLE=y + +CONFIG_I2C_VERSATILE=y + +CONFIG_THERMAL=y + +# CONFIG_MFD_T7L66XB is not set +# CONFIG_MFD_TC6387XB is not set + +CONFIG_FB_ARMCLCD=m + +CONFIG_SND_ARM=y +CONFIG_SND_ARMAACI=m + +CONFIG_USB_MUSB_HDRC=m +# CONFIG_MUSB_PIO_ONLY is not set +CONFIG_USB_TUSB6010=y +# CONFIG_USB_MUSB_DEBUG is not set + +CONFIG_MMC_ARMMMCI=m + +CONFIG_RTC_DRV_PL030=m +CONFIG_RTC_DRV_PL031=m + +# CONFIG_SGI_IOC4 is not set + +# CONFIG_DEBUG_USER is not set +# CONFIG_DEBUG_ERRORS is not set +# CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is not set ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: [Fedora-legal-list] tivodecode package
On 2009-01-26 at 12:36:52 -0500, Bernard Johnson bjohnson80...@gmail.com wrote: I need a ruling on whether tivodecode can be accepted into Fedora. It's currently submitted to rpmfusion, but Kevin Koffler thought it might be able to be accepted into Fedora proper. There were three things under consideration: * Freeness of QUALCOMM software license - appears to be free software * QUALCOMM encryption patents (free?) * MPEG program stream decoding (not decompression) Well, there really is a fourth: this is possibly a DMCA violation. Upon consultation with counsel, we decided that we're much happier with this living in RPMFusion as a result. ~spot ___ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
[Fedora-legal-list] Re: tivodecode package
Tom spot Callaway wrote: On 2009-01-26 at 12:36:52 -0500, Bernard Johnson bjohnson80...@gmail.com wrote: I need a ruling on whether tivodecode can be accepted into Fedora. It's currently submitted to rpmfusion, but Kevin Koffler thought it might be able to be accepted into Fedora proper. There were three things under consideration: * Freeness of QUALCOMM software license - appears to be free software * QUALCOMM encryption patents (free?) * MPEG program stream decoding (not decompression) Well, there really is a fourth: this is possibly a DMCA violation. Upon consultation with counsel, we decided that we're much happier with this living in RPMFusion as a result. Thanks for the quick response. ___ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
I need help
Hi folkss; I built a system with Fedora, I am willing to pay per time to get it converted to a WEB Server, do you know anyone in San Jose, CA to help me? MY TELEPHONE IS 408-238-0160 THANKS ALBERT -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: fedora 9 / 10 and flashplayer 9 /10
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009, Craig White wrote: rpm -ivh \ http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/linux/i386/adobe-release-i386-1.0-1.noarch.rpm and then... yum install flash-plugin libflashsupport No, you do not want to install libflashsupport for Flash 10, and indeed it can cause problems if you do. Flash 9 audio support had problems with recent linux releases such as Fedora 9, which is why libflashsupport was shipped with Fedora 9, since Flash 9 was the current version at that point. These issues are resolved in Flash 10 so libflashsupport is no longer necessary, and as the libflashsupport package in Fedora 9 is based on Flash 9 code it can cause problems when used with Flash 10. Michael Young -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
gnome_sound_play() doesn't work
hi Great list, It seems that the function gnome_sound_play() of libgnome dosen't work in Fedora 10. It seems that in libgnome/gnome-sound.c, there is a macro named HAVE_ESD, and if it is defined, the function will work, if it doesn't be defined, it will just return. Why this macro doesn't be defined in Fedora 10? The esdplay can play sound file on my machine. Thanks. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: How to enable internal PC speaker?
Thank you very much. I just find that it is the konsole doesn't bell. gnome-terminal works well. It is a problem of konsole. 2009/1/22 Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 07:38 +0800, 平天韩 wrote: It seems that the PC speaker doesn't work in F 10, right? The pcspkr module has been loaded. But the speaker can not bell. How to enable it? Is there a speaker or beeper on the board, or does it output through the sound card? If it's through the sound card, you'd need to have the PC speaker volume control turned up. -- [...@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.9-73.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: gnome_sound_play() doesn't work
平天韩 wrote: Why this macro doesn't be defined in Fedora 10? Probably because ESD is deprecated in favor of PulseAudio. That said, it would be possible to link libgnome against libesd which works with PulseAudio just fine. I don't know why they decided not to. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Linux drives,Fedora 10 screen image,DNS server
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 5:53 AM, johntartar no-reply...@fcp.surfsite.orgwrote: Not for me. I'm running a dual boot machine, Fedora 10 and Windows XP Ext2IFS does not work. Linux_reader does not work. Both install ok, but don't work. EXT2IFS occasionally locks Windows, if windows boots up it only sees a drive with nothing on it. Linux_reader is all screwed up. You can try ext2fsd: http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2fsd -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: hplip scanner support?
On Monday 26 January 2009 03:44:24 Anthony Messina wrote: On Sunday 25 January 2009 19:21:26 Tom Horsley wrote: Sometime when I wasn't looking hplip seems to have gotten scanner support added for most of HP's all-in-one products (too bad they didn't retrofit support for their stand alone scanners). Is anyone actually using one of the HP all-in-one devices on fedora 10 and gotten the scanner to work well? Can you scan via the low-level sane command line tools like scanimage? Maybe there is a SANE solution for devices actually available somewhere other than e-bay and antique stores :-). Too bad HP isn't putting penguin logos on their boxes and trumpeting linux support in their product pages, I stumbled across the hplip scanner info by accident :-(. I use a HP Photosmart C7280 All-in-One with tremendous results. I have it hooked in via wireless LAN and share it to many Fedora and Windows workstations over the network via saned. Ditto for the Photosmart C7180. The only problem I had was realising that the wireless was getting a different address each time when it had been powered down. Reserving an address on the router fixed that. Brilliant! Anne signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Printers
On Sunday 25 January 2009 23:35:08 Ed Greshko wrote: Anne Wilson wrote: On Sunday 25 January 2009 15:17:51 Alan Cox wrote: But who cares. You refill the cartridge a few times and then you buy a new printer not a new cartridge. They cost the same near enough so who cares if the cheap ink trashes the previous one... I care. It's just plain wrong to waste like this. OK - put it down to age, growing up in wartime and the rest. Anne Am I glad I went back and read the rest of Alan's post. Otherwise I would have gotten a very different impression of his attitude. I read the rest of it and agree in general with his points. All the same, I've found many people that frankly do not care - that do advocate throwing away like this. Someone has to stand up against the idea. :-) No offence was meant to Alan. Anne signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
squid proxy
Hi When I use the squid proxy for http, Do I need the ip forward to disable? Thank you - Now with a new friend-happy design! Try the new Yahoo! Canada Messenger-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Gateway DX4720 installation problems - nvidia 7100
Charles Landau wrote: Apparently Linux is known to have problems with the nVidia GeForce 7100; I found this post: https://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=62357forum=12 I'm looking for the right driver in hopes that will fix the video problem. It may be that kernel modesetting is active and causing the issue. try adding the nomodeset option to the grub kernel boot line. You can check the nvidia linux site to determine which GPUs are supported by which closed source driver. (If it is supported, then I suggest using akmod-nvidia-YYY from RPM Fusion to make the process of getting the driver installed easier.) DaveT. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: F10, NetworkManager, and intermittent dns -- Update
Tom Horsley wrote: On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:32:08 -0500 McGuffey, David C. wrote: Update: Intermittent dns is still present. I'd strongly suspect this is NM getting the resolv.conf file correct on initial connect, then screwing it up on subsequent DHCP lease renewal. I get the no entries in /etc/resolv.conf directly after logging in (workaround - an NM entry with static IP, and dns). Is there a more permanent fix for Fedora 10 (upgraded from F9) ? DaveT. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: How to fix fstab on bootup - forgot to comment out a line
An idea is: Boot the machine with a livecd, mount root filesystem, edit the fstab and reboot the machine. I hope helps you. Regards, - - iarly selbir ( ski0s ) :wq! On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Dan Track dan.tr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I forgot to comment out a line in /etc/fstab, now when my machine boots up it keeps dropping to a filesystem check and asks for teh root password. My question is how can I get to edit the /etc/fstab file on bootup or via grub? Please help. Thanks Dan -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Static wireless interface and runlevel 3
Todd Zullinger wrote: I do have NetworkManager starting my WPA wireless connection prior to login on my laptop. I have been wanting to do that for ages - I still could not do it in F10 - please tell us the magic recipe? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/%22Static%22-wireless-interface-and-runlevel-3-tp21659047p21664749.html Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
How to fix fstab on bootup - forgot to comment out a line
Hi I forgot to comment out a line in /etc/fstab, now when my machine boots up it keeps dropping to a filesystem check and asks for teh root password. My question is how can I get to edit the /etc/fstab file on bootup or via grub? Please help. Thanks Dan -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: F10, NetworkManager, and intermittent dns -- Update
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:23:49 +1100 David Timms wrote: Tom Horsley wrote: On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:32:08 -0500 McGuffey, David C. wrote: Update: Intermittent dns is still present. I'd strongly suspect this is NM getting the resolv.conf file correct on initial connect, then screwing it up on subsequent DHCP lease renewal. I get the no entries in /etc/resolv.conf directly after logging in (workaround - an NM entry with static IP, and dns). Is there a more permanent fix for Fedora 10 (upgraded from F9) ? In /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 I have the line: PEERDNS=no which (in theory) prevents NM from doing anything at all to the resolv.conf file when acting on that interface (of course you then have to make sure you set resolv.conf yourself). -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Printers
On Sunday 25 January 2009 10:17:51 Alan Cox wrote: If you are doing any volume a decent colour laser is a huge cost saving. Nowdays I have a laser - mostly because I can print to vinyl, print to transfers without hassle and don't have the 'delights' of inkjet ink being waterbased so impossible to use in combination with glues or many paints. I agree with your position 110%. One area where lasers have not done as well is photo printing. I get adequate results for everyday use using some special paper, but, it's not the same as a Canon Photo Printer, which can be stunning. But, you said something - I've never heard of printing on vinyl with a laser - could you expand on that? What are you printing? How can vinyl survive the heat? Details would be appreciated... -- Claude Jones Brunswick, MD -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: fedora 9 / 10 and flashplayer 9 /10
On Sun, 2009-01-25 at 22:50 -0800, Paul Newell wrote: Thanks for the suggestion, will try. My one question before I begin is I kept seeing references to pulseaudio and something else like ASLA (some four letter acryomn) that I can't relocate on the web (I'll do a better search later). Does this ring a bell and, if so, are these part of standard Fedora 9 that I don't need to worry about as they are already there? pulseaudio and alsa are part of a typical (and standard) install of Fedora 9 Craig -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: fedora 9 / 10 and flashplayer 9 /10
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 08:34 +, M A Young wrote: On Sun, 25 Jan 2009, Craig White wrote: rpm -ivh \ http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/linux/i386/adobe-release-i386-1.0-1.noarch.rpm and then... yum install flash-plugin libflashsupport No, you do not want to install libflashsupport for Flash 10, and indeed it can cause problems if you do. Flash 9 audio support had problems with recent linux releases such as Fedora 9, which is why libflashsupport was shipped with Fedora 9, since Flash 9 was the current version at that point. These issues are resolved in Flash 10 so libflashsupport is no longer necessary, and as the libflashsupport package in Fedora 9 is based on Flash 9 code it can cause problems when used with Flash 10. thanks for the clarification Craig -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: F10, NetworkManager, and intermittent dns -- Update
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 08:47 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote: On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:23:49 +1100 David Timms wrote: Tom Horsley wrote: On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:32:08 -0500 McGuffey, David C. wrote: Update: Intermittent dns is still present. I'd strongly suspect this is NM getting the resolv.conf file correct on initial connect, then screwing it up on subsequent DHCP lease renewal. I get the no entries in /etc/resolv.conf directly after logging in (workaround - an NM entry with static IP, and dns). Is there a more permanent fix for Fedora 10 (upgraded from F9) ? In /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 I have the line: PEERDNS=no which (in theory) prevents NM from doing anything at all to the resolv.conf file when acting on that interface (of course you then have to make sure you set resolv.conf yourself). I thought NM had a know bug where it did not yet respect the PEERDNS=no entry. Has this been fixed? The only (and most unfortunate) way I have been able to reliably keep my resolf.conf file from getting waxed by NM has been to set it as immutable. A _very_ nasty way of doing things, but it does work. Cheers, Chris -- If you get to thinkin' you're a person of some influence, try orderin' someone else's dog around. --Cowboy Wisdom -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Partitioning
On Sun, 2009-01-25 at 22:39 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Aaron Konstam wrote: If F!0 is already running all you have to do is provide a partion for the XP. The XP Installer will format its partition. The F10 partion(s) and the swap partition will stay as they are. But the Winblow$ installer will f*** up your GRUB MBR, it'll overwrite it with the default M$ one. So you'll have to reinstall GRUB after installing Winblow$. Thus, have a F10 rescue CD ready. Kevin Kofler I agree that is an added step at the end of the installation. -- === Be nice to people on the way up, because you'll meet them on your way down. -- Wilson Mizner === Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
hostname curiosity
When I boot my F9 box it can have one of two different host names and I would like to figure why this is. One of the hostnames, hpnumber is the name set by the manufacturer and it's probably in the BIOS. I think that the other one is set via dhcp. Our network dhcp server is a Windows box. The pattern seems to be that when I first turn the machine on, it gets the hpnumber hotsname but if I reboot, I get the dhcp name. I would like to always get the dhcp name. Any suggestions how on to investigate this? Thanks, Steve -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: X11 sweep frequencies, how are they determined?
I was assuming that the numbers 55, 60, 85, etc were frame rates, they are actually vertical refresh rates, and another individual told me where to find them. In my home directory there is a .config subdirectory and therein is a file monitors.xml It has the vertical refresh rate. I put the vertical refresh rate to lie in range and restored the user's settings. I did not find the equivalent for the logon screen. Does it use the one from root? Leslie --- On Sun, 1/25/09, NiftyFedora Mitch niftyfed...@niftyegg.com wrote: From: NiftyFedora Mitch niftyfed...@niftyegg.com Subject: Re: X11 sweep frequencies, how are they determined? To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora-list@redhat.com Date: Sunday, January 25, 2009, 1:58 AM On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 7:33 PM, David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au wrote: Leslie Satenstein wrote: My question is in the subject line. You might have to give a little more info on this query (I certainly aren't sure what you are talking about) ? Where did you see it mentioned (internet, config file... ?) DaveT. I suspect the subject line is making reference to the horizontal and vertical refresh rates and other params like dot clock... On older monitors these values were documented by the vendor. X11 set up tables have collections of these matched to vendor part numbers. The xorg.conf file will have them in the Monitor description section. New monitors have data wires that permit the system driver to look up the vendor data. Google/ search wikipedia for: the Display Data Channel (DDC) and the Extended Display Identification Data (EDID), which allows computers to communicate with different monitor extensions. and more. Note that historically some hardware could be damaged by bad settings so vendor data for both the card and display itself can be important. -- NiftyFedora T o m M i t c h e l l -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Printers
O is photo printing. I get adequate results for everyday use using some special paper, but, it's not the same as a Canon Photo Printer, which can be stunning. I still have a photo printer for that one reason, but rarely use it. But, you said something - I've never heard of printing on vinyl with a laser - could you expand on that? What are you printing? How can vinyl survive the heat? Details would be appreciated... You can get laser printable vinyls designed for the purpose. The process is then something like laser print onto vinyl (with backing sheet) including alignment marks Feed resulting sheet into vinyl cutting machine Tell machine to align to marks Cut Peel Apply Custom printed decals of any shape and size you want. Alan -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: hostname curiosity
Steve wrote: When I boot my F9 box it can have one of two different host names and I would like to figure why this is. One of the hostnames, hpnumber is the name set by the manufacturer and it's probably in the BIOS. I think that the other one is set via dhcp. Our network dhcp server is a Windows box. The pattern seems to be that when I first turn the machine on, it gets the hpnumber hotsname but if I reboot, I get the dhcp name. I would like to always get the dhcp name. Any suggestions how on to investigate this? The only way I could see the hostname being set by the BIOS is if it did the connection to the DHCP server. (Network boot?) It is possible to set up the DHCP request to request a specific hostname, or the DHCP server to assign a specific hostname. You can try setting DHCP_HOSTNAME in the config file for the interface and see if that helps. You can also set the hostname in /etc/sysconfig/network. Mikkel -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Printers
Alan Cox wrote: O is photo printing. I get adequate results for everyday use using some special paper, but, it's not the same as a Canon Photo Printer, which can be stunning. I still have a photo printer for that one reason, but rarely use it. But, you said something - I've never heard of printing on vinyl with a laser - could you expand on that? What are you printing? How can vinyl survive the heat? Details would be appreciated... You can get laser printable vinyls designed for the purpose. The process is then something like laser print onto vinyl (with backing sheet) including alignment marks Feed resulting sheet into vinyl cutting machine Tell machine to align to marks Cut Peel Apply Custom printed decals of any shape and size you want. Alan That sounds like fun. A bit difficult if you don't have the vinyl cutting machine, but you run into the same problems with an ink jet. Now if only they made printable CD/DVDs that would work in a laser printer. :) Mikkel -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Connect to active session with NX in F10
Is there any way to use nx to connect to the active session at the console of an F10 wkst? If I walk away and leave it locked, I am hoping to connect to that session remotely? Thanks! jlc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Connect to active session with NX in F10
I haven't done it, but I know the NX/FreeNX server can be put into a mirroring mode, where it basically connects to a local VNC server to show display :0 Matthew Nicholson nichol...@eps.harvard.edu Harvard University FAS IT Research Computing Dept. Of Earth and Planetary Science On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote: Is there any way to use nx to connect to the active session at the console of an F10 wkst? If I walk away and leave it locked, I am hoping to connect to that session remotely? Thanks! jlc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Printers
That sounds like fun. A bit difficult if you don't have the vinyl cutting machine, but you run into the same problems with an ink jet. I've not found any inkjet printable vinyl although I'm sure it exists somewhere. Now if only they made printable CD/DVDs that would work in a laser printer. :) Oh but they do sort of - print to vinyl, cut circles on vinyl cutter ... -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Printers
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: Alan Cox wrote: laser print onto vinyl (with backing sheet) including alignment marks Feed resulting sheet into vinyl cutting machine Tell machine to align to marks Cut Peel Apply Custom printed decals of any shape and size you want. That sounds like fun. A bit difficult if you don't have the vinyl cutting machine, but you run into the same problems with an ink jet. If you only need small runs, many signwriters offer custom vinyl decal services. A friend's mother worked at one about 16 years ago in a small town in Wales so they should be fairly widespread now :) Depending on what you need the decals applied to they may also do that step for you - it all depends on whether it will fit into their equipment. This means you needn't worry about aligning them or applying them smoothly which is the really tricky part if you don't have the tools and experience. Bryn. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: hostname curiosity
Mikkel L. Ellertson mik...@infinity-ltd.com wrote: Steve wrote: When I boot my F9 box it can have one of two different host names and I would like to figure why this is. One of the hostnames, hpnumber is the name set by the manufacturer and it's probably in the BIOS. I think that the other one is set via dhcp. Our network dhcp server is a Windows box. The pattern seems to be that when I first turn the machine on, it gets the hpnumber hotsname but if I reboot, I get the dhcp name. I would like to always get the dhcp name. Any suggestions how on to investigate this? The only way I could see the hostname being set by the BIOS is if it did the connection to the DHCP server. (Network boot?) It is possible to set up the DHCP request to request a specific hostname, or the DHCP server to assign a specific hostname. You can try setting DHCP_HOSTNAME in the config file for the interface and see if that helps. You can also set the hostname in /etc/sysconfig/network. I *could* set dhcp to request a specific filename - I do this on my home machine by creating a /etc/dhclient.conf file containing send host-name my host name; - but that wouldn't satisfy my curiosity and besides, the host name really should be set by the dhcp server. I'll try adding DHCP_HOSTNAME to /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0. Currently it contains BOOTPROTO=dhcp plus a few other things. /etc/sysconfig/network contains NETWORKING=yes HOSTNAME=localhost.localdomain so the system seems to be ignoring that hostname altogether. Steve -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Upgrading to F10 without DVD
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at writes: Oliver Ruebenacker wrote: I don't have a drive to write to DVD (only to CD). How can I upgrade from F9 to F10? Plenty of methods. Some have already been suggested: * preupgrade * netinstall * HD install also: usb thumbdrive install. Used this for installing on an Acer Aspire One which doesn't have any CD or DVD. The advantage of the latter is you now have a thumbdrive you can take to the local electronic retailer and install a real OS on all the demo machines. ;-) -wolfgang -- Wolfgang S. Rupprecht http://www.full-steam.org/ (ipv6-only) You may need to config 6to4 to see the above pages. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: hostname curiosity [SOLVED]
Steve zep...@cfl.rr.com wrote: Mikkel L. Ellertson mik...@infinity-ltd.com wrote: Steve wrote: When I boot my F9 box it can have one of two different host names and I would like to figure why this is. One of the hostnames, hpnumber is the name set by the manufacturer and it's probably in the BIOS. I think that the other one is set via dhcp. Our network dhcp server is a Windows box. The pattern seems to be that when I first turn the machine on, it gets the hpnumber hotsname but if I reboot, I get the dhcp name. I would like to always get the dhcp name. Any suggestions how on to investigate this? The only way I could see the hostname being set by the BIOS is if it did the connection to the DHCP server. (Network boot?) It is possible to set up the DHCP request to request a specific hostname, or the DHCP server to assign a specific hostname. You can try setting DHCP_HOSTNAME in the config file for the interface and see if that helps. You can also set the hostname in /etc/sysconfig/network. I *could* set dhcp to request a specific filename - I do this on my home machine by creating a /etc/dhclient.conf file containing send host-name my host name; - but that wouldn't satisfy my curiosity and besides, the host name really should be set by the dhcp server. I'll try adding DHCP_HOSTNAME to /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0. Currently it contains BOOTPROTO=dhcp plus a few other things. /etc/sysconfig/network contains NETWORKING=yes HOSTNAME=localhost.localdomain so the system seems to be ignoring that hostname altogether. Cool! Adding DHCP_HOSTNAME=yes to /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 seems to have done the trick. Now there is a longer pause during booting when it gets to the Setting up eth0...[OK] line so I'm guessing it is waiting a little longer to get an answer from the dhcp server. Btw, where are the docs for the ifcfg-eth0 file syntax? There is no man page for it. Thanks Steve -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
PLEASE, I need help with printing to HP1320 Laserjet
Even after I upgraded to F10, I'm still having problems and I have no idea how to proceed. Most times when I print, I only get the top few inches of the sheet. Afterwards, the job is still sitting in the queue and the hp process is running off with half the cpu. Here's the process hierarchy: root Ss 10:54 0:00 cupsd lp S10:58 0:00 \_ /usr/bin/perl \ /usr/lib/cups/filter/foomatic-rip 48 steveo ca6.ps 1 \ PrintoutMode=Normal PageSize=Letter Quality=300GrayscaleK \ Duplex=DuplexNoTumble InputSlot=Default number-up=1 \ job-uuid=urn:uuid:61669726-b09d-3489-6a08-d76f16a34193 lp S10:58 0:00 | \_ /usr/bin/perl \ /usr/lib/cups/filter/foomatic-rip 48 steveo ca6.ps 1 \ PrintoutMode=Normal PageSize=Letter Quality=300GrayscaleK \ Duplex=DuplexNoTumble InputSlot=Default number-up=1 \ job-uuid=urn:uuid:61669726-b09d-3489-6a08-d76f16a34193 lp S10:58 0:00 | \_ /usr/bin/perl \ /usr/lib/cups/filter/foomatic-rip 48 steveo ca6.ps 1 \ PrintoutMode=Normal PageSize=Letter Quality=300GrayscaleK \ Duplex=DuplexNoTumble InputSlot=Default number-up=1 \ job-uuid=urn:uuid:61669726-b09d-3489-6a08-d76f16a34193 lp S10:58 0:00 | \_ gs -sstdout=%stderr -dBATCH \ -dPARANOIDSAFER -dQUIET -dNOPAUSE \ -sDEVICE=ijs -sIjsServer=hpijs \ -sDeviceManufacturer=HEWLETT-PACKARD \ -sDeviceModel=HP LaserJet -dDEVICEWIDTHPOINTS=612 \ -dDEVICEHEIGHTPOINTS=792 \ -dDuplex=true -dTumble=false -r30 lp S10:58 0:00 | \_ hpijs lp R10:58 3:03 \_ \ hp:/par/hp_LaserJet_1320_series?device=/dev/parport0 48 steveo ca6.ps 1 \ PrintoutMode=Normal PageSize=Letter Quality=300GrayscaleK \ Duplex=DuplexNoTumble InputSlot=Default number-up=1 \ job-uuid=urn:uuid:61669726-b09d-3489-6a08-d76f16a34193 The hp process is the last one. Sometimes if I restart cups, it might print, but most of the time I only get the top of the sheet. In my cupsd.conf, I set LogLevel debug. In my /var/log/cups/error_log, I don't see anything that looks horrible, but I could be wrong. Can anyone suggest something I can do to get further in this problem? TIA -- Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have .0. happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0 Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 000 individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question? steveo at syslang.net -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
