Re: Wallpaper for Beta?

2009-03-05 Thread Máirín Duffy

Hey Nicu~



- Original Message 
 From: Nicu Buculei nicu_fed...@nicubunu.ro

 There are a few things I am not happy about, like the grass not being green 
 enough and the sky being more cyan than blue, but there is time for those 
 after 
 the Beta.

It started out a lot more green  cyan (see Mola's original mockup, bottom 
here: http://mola.fedorapeople.org/gimp/view/)

But trying that as a wallpaper, it was way too intense and contrasty / 
distracting for a wallpaper. :(

~m



  

___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: Wallpaper for Beta?

2009-03-05 Thread Martin Sourada
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 21:35 -0800, Máirín Duffy wrote:
 This is what I've got
 
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F11_Artwork#Beta_Mockups
 
 It's not perfect, but it's something what do you think?
 
 ~m
Hi Mo,

I've put them to a rpm package [1]. I'll submit it for inclusion in
fedora later if you find it good.

Martin

References:
[1]
http://mso.fedorapeople.org/packages/rawhide/noarch/leonidas-backgrounds-10.92.0-1.fc11.noarch.rpm



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: Wallpaper for Beta?

2009-03-05 Thread Máirín Duffy

Hey Nicu!



- Original Message 
 From: Nicu Buculei nicu_fed...@nicubunu.ro

 I tried a quick trick starting from one of Mola's images (attached): 
 decreased 
 the saturation and increased the lightness a bit, the colors are closer to 
 what 
 I have in mind (but I should have applied the lightness/saturation operation 
 separately to the grass and sky).
 

Would you mind applying those changes to the newer mockup I posted to the wiki 
last night?

The reason I ask is because Mola's mockup has brushes that don't have an 
explicit license so I had to redo parts of the image.

~m



  

___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: Fedora-art-list Digest, Vol 36, Issue 6

2009-03-05 Thread brian hurren
Just a quick unrelated question. Is it too early to suggest ideas for fedora12?
I have also done an animation course, is there anyway that I could help out 
with this? Or any other design projects I could help with? 

--- On Fri, 6/3/09, fedora-art-list-requ...@redhat.com 
fedora-art-list-requ...@redhat.com wrote:
From: fedora-art-list-requ...@redhat.com fedora-art-list-requ...@redhat.com
Subject: Fedora-art-list Digest, Vol 36, Issue 6
To: fedora-art-list@redhat.com
Received: Friday, 6 March, 2009, 2:06 AM

Send Fedora-art-list mailing list submissions to
fedora-art-list@redhat.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
fedora-art-list-requ...@redhat.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
fedora-art-list-ow...@redhat.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of Fedora-art-list digest...


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Wallpaper for Beta? (Nicu Buculei)
   2. Re: Wallpaper for Beta? (M?ir?n Duffy)
   3. Re: Wallpaper for Beta? (Martin Sourada)
   4. Re: Wallpaper for Beta? (Nicu Buculei)


--

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 09:44:28 +0200
From: Nicu Buculei nicu_fed...@nicubunu.ro
Subject: Re: Wallpaper for Beta?
To: Fedora Art List fedora-art-list@redhat.com
Message-ID: 49af82dc.4040...@nicubunu.ro
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed

Máirín Duffy wrote:
 From: Paul W. Frields
 When is the decision going to be made about which one goes in the
 Beta?
 
 This is what I've got
 
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F11_Artwork#Beta_Mockups
 
 It's not perfect, but it's something what do you think?

I think we can go with one of those for beta, my option would be for on 
*with* a temple (Betamockup1_wide_right.png).

There are a few things I am not happy about, like the grass not being 
green enough and the sky being more cyan than blue, but there is time 
for those after the Beta.

-- 
nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com/
photography: http://photoblog.nicubunu.ro/
my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/



--

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 04:38:24 -0800 (PST)
From: M?ir?n Duffy mai...@linuxgrrl.com
Subject: Re: Wallpaper for Beta?
To: Fedora Art List fedora-art-list@redhat.com
Message-ID: 932306.4533...@web50901.mail.re2.yahoo.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1


Hey Nicu~



- Original Message 
 From: Nicu Buculei nicu_fed...@nicubunu.ro

 There are a few things I am not happy about, like the grass not being
green 
 enough and the sky being more cyan than blue, but there is time for those
after 
 the Beta.

It started out a lot more green  cyan (see Mola's original mockup,
bottom here: http://mola.fedorapeople.org/gimp/view/)

But trying that as a wallpaper, it was way too intense and contrasty /
distracting for a wallpaper. :(

~m



  



--

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 14:03:18 +0100
From: Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Wallpaper for Beta?
To: Fedora Art List fedora-art-list@redhat.com
Message-ID: 1236258198.5357.3.ca...@pc-notebook.kolej.mff.cuni.cz
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 21:35 -0800, Máirín Duffy wrote:
 This is what I've got
 
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F11_Artwork#Beta_Mockups
 
 It's not perfect, but it's something what do you think?
 
 ~m
Hi Mo,

I've put them to a rpm package [1]. I'll submit it for inclusion in
fedora later if you find it good.

Martin

References:
[1]
http://mso.fedorapeople.org/packages/rawhide/noarch/leonidas-backgrounds-10.92.0-1.fc11.noarch.rpm

-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url :
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-art-list/attachments/20090305/60fc5bfc/attachment.bin

--

Message: 4
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:05:48 +0200
From: Nicu Buculei nicu_fed...@nicubunu.ro
Subject: Re: Wallpaper for Beta?
To: Fedora Art List fedora-art-list@redhat.com
Message-ID: 49afce2c.9030...@nicubunu.ro
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Máirín Duffy wrote:
 From: Nicu Buculei
 
 There are a few things I am not happy about, like the grass not being
green 
 enough and the sky being more cyan than blue, but there is time for
those after 
 the Beta.
 
 It started out a lot more green  cyan (see Mola's original
mockup, bottom here: http://mola.fedorapeople.org/gimp/view/)

I know Mola's images, we talked about them on IRC before he mailed to 
the list.

 But trying that as a wallpaper, it was way too intense and contrasty /
distracting for a wallpaper. :(

You are right, Mola's colors are too saturated

Re: Wallpaper for Beta?

2009-03-05 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 03:05:48PM +0200, Nicu Buculei wrote:
 The hard reality is an wallpaper like this will be inevitably compared  
 with the default Windows XP wallpaper, which had set a standard in  
 people's minds: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Windows_XP_SP3.png

Interesting that you mention this, because looking at a couple of the
beta releases for Windows 7, I notice they've gone for a wallpaper
that looks *really* close to the Fedora 9 default wallpaper:

http://www.askvg.com/download-windows-7-official-wallpaper-shown-at-pdc-2008/
http://www.askvg.com/download-windows-7-beta-build-6936-default-desktop-wallpaper/

I suppose one could take the position that if Microsoft does it, it's
bad, but we should recognize they have a lot of money to spend on
design, and they've come up with something very close to what you, the
Fedora Artwork team, did in the past year with free tools and open
processes.  That speaks volumes for this team in my opinion.

-- 
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug


pgp0GzBnVfuDN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: Wallpaper for Beta?

2009-03-05 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 09:35:52PM -0800, Máirín Duffy wrote:
  From: Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com
 
  When is the decision going to be made about which one goes in the
  Beta?
 
 This is what I've got
 
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F11_Artwork#Beta_Mockups
 
 It's not perfect, but it's something what do you think?

WANT.

-- 
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug


pgpdR7YE0ZnV1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: Wallpaper for Beta?

2009-03-05 Thread Nicu Buculei

Máirín Duffy wrote:


Would you mind applying those changes to the newer mockup I posted to the wiki 
last night?


I can't apply the same changes sing the image is different, but I tried 
something: 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Image:Artwork_F11_Betamockup1_n.jpg

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Image:Artwork_F11_Betamockup1_n.xcf.bz2

Personally I like a bit better this way: the color adjustment layer 
was removes since it made the sky more cyan and the color balance for 
the background was altered to reduce the cyan more. Also the Cliff 
overlay layer was removed and the color balance of the Cliff - Base 
was altered to make it greener. But I am not entirely happy with what I 
did...


--
nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com/
photography: http://photoblog.nicubunu.ro/
my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/

___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: Fedora-art-list Digest, Vol 36, Issue 6

2009-03-05 Thread Nicu Buculei

brian hurren wrote:
Just a quick unrelated question. Is it too early to suggest ideas for 
fedora12?


Yes, is a bit earlier since we don't know how the process will be going 
(for F11 we tried something new, tying the theme to the release name and 
going with a single concept).
But if you have some idea, you can create a wiki page about it and when 
the time will come, bring it into discussion.


I have also done an animation course, is there anyway that I could help 
out with this? Or any other design projects I could help with?


There are a number of open requests begging for attention in the Design 
Service queue: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/DesignService
Also, Martin and Luya could probably use some help with the Echo theme: 
https://fedorahosted.org/echo-icon-theme/


Tell us more about animation, probably we can use some (as long as they 
are in Free formats and preferably developed with Open tools).


--
nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com/
photography: http://photoblog.nicubunu.ro/
my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/

___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


[echo-perspective] New computer icon set

2009-03-05 Thread Martin Sourada
Hi,

I've created a computer icon [1] for echo-perspective. I was having
pretty serious difficulties with the keyboard design, so I decided to
rather adapt the mango one [2]. Since it's also CC-BY-SA it should be
OK.

Comments welcome,
Martin

References:
[1] http://mso.fedorapeople.org/echo-perspective/computer.svg
[2]
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/tango/tango-icon-library/tree/svg/input-keyboard.svg

attachment: computer.png

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


[Bug 466404] Segmentation fault.

2009-03-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466404





--- Comment #11 from Nils Philippsen nphil...@redhat.com  2009-03-05 04:44:02 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
 ok, so this is open to try and address the crashing in frontforge when it's
 lied to about what fonts are available? :) 
 
 I can bring the issue up upstream and see if they can come up with a fix.

Yes, that'd be good and very appreciated.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


rpms/lohit-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.9, 1.10 lohit-fonts.spec, 1.11, 1.12 sources, 1.9, 1.10

2009-03-05 Thread Rahul Bhalerao
Author: rbhalera

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19490

Modified Files:
.cvsignore lohit-fonts.spec sources 
Log Message:
New bugfixed version: lohit-fonts-2.3.8


Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10
--- .cvsignore  9 Sep 2008 12:08:11 -   1.9
+++ .cvsignore  5 Mar 2009 14:12:48 -   1.10
@@ -1 +1 @@
-lohit-fonts-2.3.1.tar.gz
+lohit-fonts-2.3.8.tar.gz


Index: lohit-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-fonts/devel/lohit-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.11
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -r1.11 -r1.12
--- lohit-fonts.spec25 Feb 2009 20:57:00 -  1.11
+++ lohit-fonts.spec5 Mar 2009 14:12:48 -   1.12
@@ -7,8 +7,8 @@
 
 
 Name:   %{fontname}-fonts
-Version:2.3.1
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Version:2.3.8
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Free Indian truetype/opentype fonts
 
 Group:  User Interface/X
@@ -33,6 +33,17 @@
 
 This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages.
 
+%package -n %{fontname}-assamese-fonts
+Summary:Free Assamese font
+Group:  User Interface/X
+Requires:   %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
+
+%description -n %{fontname}-assamese-fonts
+%common_desc
+This package provides a free Assamese truetype/opentype font.
+
+%_font_pkg -n assamese lohit_as.ttf
+
 %package -n %{fontname}-bengali-fonts
 Summary:Free Bengali font
 Group:  User Interface/X
@@ -256,6 +267,16 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+
+* Thu Mar 05 2009 Rahul Bhalerao rbhal...@redhat.com - 2.3.8-1.fc11
+- Bug 428427 - [kn_IN][fonts-indic] - 0CB5+0CCA is wrongly rendering 
+- Bug 450699 - [ta_IN]Errors in sh and shrI in Lohit Tamil font (fixed in 
font, needs rendering update)
+- Bug 476427 - [te_IN] - Consonant+Virama+Consonant+Virama+space renders the 
second virama as a separate glyph in
+  lohit-telugu font
+- Bug 479100 - [kn_IN] Conjunct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is 
rendering wrongly
+- Bug 483530 - [bn_IN]Lohit Bengali font cheating about character support
+- Added Lohit-Assamese
+
 * Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 2.3.1-3
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
 


Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-fonts/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10
--- sources 9 Sep 2008 12:08:11 -   1.9
+++ sources 5 Mar 2009 14:12:48 -   1.10
@@ -1 +1 @@
-ca26218fc6323633210c674fe9e2f9d2  lohit-fonts-2.3.1.tar.gz
+f3b5c3cd8e370f1669d44cec3eab1f2b  lohit-fonts-2.3.8.tar.gz

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 428427] [kn_IN][fonts-indic] - 0CB5+0CCA is wrongly rendering

2009-03-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428427


Rahul Bhalerao rbhal...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution||RAWHIDE




--- Comment #12 from Rahul Bhalerao rbhal...@redhat.com  2009-03-05 09:23:11 
EDT ---
Fixed in lohit-fonts-2.3.8.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 450699] [ta_IN] Errors in sh and shrI in Lohit Tamil font

2009-03-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450699


Rahul Bhalerao rbhal...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||RAWHIDE
Summary|lohit-fonts: Errors in sh |[ta_IN] Errors in sh and
   |and shrI in Lohit Tamil   |shrI in Lohit Tamil font
   |font|




--- Comment #5 from Rahul Bhalerao rbhal...@redhat.com  2009-03-05 09:24:55 
EDT ---
Font fixed in lohit-fonts-2.3.8. Please wait for an update in pango for final
resolve.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 476427] [te_IN] - Consonant+Virama+Consonant+Virama+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font

2009-03-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476427


Rahul Bhalerao rbhal...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution||RAWHIDE




--- Comment #8 from Rahul Bhalerao rbhal...@redhat.com  2009-03-05 09:32:13 
EDT ---
Fixed in lohit-fonts-2.3.8. (lohit-telugu-fonts-2.3.8-1)
Padmanabhan, I tried using your patch. Unfortunately it did not work. Baiscally
the solution involved two simple changes, 
1.Changing the lookup properties for 'ignore marks' at one place
2.Changing the glyph type for all the 'blwf' forms of consonants to 'Mark' from
'BaseGlyph'.

Thanks for the work you did on this bug. Your analysis has helped a lot in
fixing it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 483530] [bn_IN] Lohit Bengali font cheating about character support

2009-03-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483530


Rahul Bhalerao rbhal...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Lohit Bengali font cheating |[bn_IN] Lohit Bengali font
   |about character support |cheating about character
   ||support




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 479100] [kn_IN] Conjunct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly

2009-03-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100


Rahul Bhalerao rbhal...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||RAWHIDE




--- Comment #14 from Rahul Bhalerao rbhal...@redhat.com  2009-03-05 09:36:32 
EDT ---
Fixed in lohit-fonts-2.3.8. (lohit-kannada-fonts-2.3.8-1)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts

2009-03-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977


Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||479238




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 479238] please update to latest release (20090104)

2009-03-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479238


Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||l...@jcomserv.net
 Depends on||486977, 47336




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts

2009-03-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977


Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|needinfo?(l...@jcomserv.net |
   |)   |




--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net  2009-03-05 11:55:23 EDT ---
Corrected all but 9.  Can't test if 9 is needed in rawhide as mock builds are
failing at the yum step with 404s, even with a fresh root cache.  Probably a
temporary issue.

rel-eng ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1225

Otherwise I *think * I hit all your points.

SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts.spec
SRPM:
http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts-20090104-4.fc10.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 488675] fontforge ignores keyboard input since last system update

2009-03-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488675





--- Comment #5 from Michael mcl...@gmail.com  2009-03-05 15:14:11 EDT ---
I mean Shift and Alt work with the mouse but not in combination with other
keys.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 477416] [lilypond] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-03-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416


Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 CC||caol...@redhat.com
 Resolution||RAWHIDE




--- Comment #29 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net  2009-03-05 15:14:57 EDT ---
Taking silence as agreement.  Updated to 2.12.2 as well, and FTBFS graciously
fixed by Caolán McNamara.

Fixed in rawhide, added to comps.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11

2009-03-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044


Bug 477044 depends on bug 477416, which changed state.

Bug 477416 Summary: [lilypond] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts

2009-03-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net  2009-03-05 
15:13:58 EDT ---
We're getting there :)

1. you still have at least one %define in common_desc (probably did not notice
it because you've reordered the template)

2.you still have a needless group declaration in your common package

3. you should simplify your subpackage names (for example use
%{fontname}-mono-fonts instead of %{fontname}-freemono-fonts). Repeating the
project name does not really help users.

4. you need to drop
Requires:  gnu-free-fonts-freemono-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
Requires:  gnu-free-fonts-freesans-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
Requires:  gnu-free-fonts-freeserif-fonts = %{version}-%{release}

Obsoletes: freefont  20090104-2

from your main package

5. you probably don't need to obsolete package names that were never pushed to
user systems, this obsolete data will never be used

6. you don't need
%dir %{_fontdir}
in your common package

7. you can unroll the for loop, but if you do so make sure you don't reference
the for variable anymore

8. your fontconfig rule filenames need to start with a number to work (in your
case 60 is probably fine, see
/usr/share/fontconfig/templates/fontconfig-priorities.txt)

9. your fontconfig rules won't work if you just put the font name everywhere
blindly. See /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/fontconfig-generics.txt and 
/usr/share/fontconfig/templates/basic-font-template.txt

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts

2009-03-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977





--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net  2009-03-05 15:53:44 EDT ---
Better?

SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts.spec
SRPM:
http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts-20090104-6.fc10.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 477416] [lilypond] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-03-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416





--- Comment #30 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com  
2009-03-05 16:58:47 EDT ---
Sorry I didn't respond, I missed the mail. To be honest I wouldn't have said
much helpful anyway, tex font packaging is a mess. I am starting to think about
how to sort it out and putting a proposal together as part of a concerted
effort to rationalize tex packaging in general. But, real life is making this a
slow goal. sorry.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 479238] please update to latest release (freefont-ttf-20090104)

2009-03-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479238


Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|please update to latest |please update to latest
   |release (20090104)  |release
   ||(freefont-ttf-20090104)




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 473836] Fonts in GNOME look blurry (was: in Firefox)

2009-03-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473836


Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||peter...@redhat.com
   Severity|high|medium




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts

2009-03-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977





--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com  2009-03-05 19:12:09 
EDT ---
*** Bug 479238 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


Introduction

2009-03-05 Thread Clifford Chandler
Hello everyone,
 My name is Cliff Chandler, and I'm a student at GA State University. I'm 
really looking forward to being involved with Fedora. I've been using Fedora 
since Fedora 6, and I've been gradually using it more and more, and now I 
nearly depend on it. At school I do all my programming in Java, so I've become 
quite proficient at that, however in my free time,
I prefer to write in C and play with OpenGL and SDL. As for web development, I 
am comfortable with HTML/CSS, PHP (and SQL when a database is needed), and 
basic JavaScript. Python seems to be more important every day, so I've just 
started with that as well. I've checked out the infrastructure/getting started 
page (this message is to the infrastructure-list as well as the websites-list), 
but any more guidance is appreciated.

-Cliff

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Introduction

2009-03-05 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
Clifford Chandler wrote:
 Hello everyone,
  My name is Cliff Chandler, and I'm a student at GA State University. I'm 
 really looking forward to being involved with Fedora. I've been using Fedora 
 since Fedora 6, and I've been gradually using it more and more, and now I 
 nearly depend on it. At school I do all my programming in Java, so I've 
 become quite proficient at that, however in my free time,
 I prefer to write in C and play with OpenGL and SDL. As for web development, 
 I am comfortable with HTML/CSS, PHP (and SQL when a database is needed), and 
 basic JavaScript. Python seems to be more important every day, so I've just 
 started with that as well. I've checked out the infrastructure/getting 
 started page (this message is to the infrastructure-list as well as the 
 websites-list), but any more guidance is appreciated.
 
Hi Cliff!

If you're looking to program in C, Fedora does a lot of work upstream on
a lot of programs written in C.  Offering to look into bugs and do
debugging of issues in C programs in fedora-devel-list is one,
Fedora-centric way to get involved there.  Working with upstreams
directly to code new features that Fedora wants is another way.

If you're looking to do more things directly related to Fedora, the web
team and infrastructure could both use your talents in web development.
 Infrastructure concentrates more on programming the web applications
that we run (the accounts system, package database, koji build system,
bodhi updates, mirrormanager, smolt, and others).  These are all written
in python using the TurboGears web framework.  There's work for people
interested in working with HTML, CSS, JavaScript and Python here.
ricky, ianweller, and mizmo can better fill you in on what they could
put you to work doing in websites.

If you're on IRC we all tend to hang out on irc.freenode.net,
#fedora-admin (infrastructure) and #fedora-websites  I'm abadger1999 if
you have questions about getting started in an initial project.

-Toshio



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Change Freeze and an exception

2009-03-05 Thread Mike McGrath
Hey guys, just a reminder the beta release is to be released at the end of
the month.  The change freeze will start on the 10th and be lifted on
March 25th.

Also during this freeze we're going to be working with the translations
team to deploy a new tx instance.  Based on what I know the risk to the
beta release is fairly low.  At worst we'll see some downtime on our
webapps for a small period of time.   Still, it's a risk and we'll be
treating tx like everything else and asking for changes every time we have
them... but be prepared, there could be many.

-Mike

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Outstanding tickets

2009-03-05 Thread Mike McGrath
If you have one of the tickets below please do clean it up :)  Some are
over a year old.

  1 boodle
  1 bretm
  1 elections-members
  1 fchiulli
  1 ggruener
  1 ivazquez
  1 jcollie_jsmith
  1 jkeating
  1 mdomsch
  1 onekopaka
  1 owner
  1 santosp
  1 skvidal
  1 sspreitzer
  1 steved
  1 susmit
  1 ynemoy
  2 damian
  2 glezos
  2 laxathom
  2 mmahut
  2 web-members
  2 webmaster
  4 huzaifas
  4 ianweller
  4 jcollie
  4 lmacken
  4 sysadmin-noc-members
  6 notting
  6 toshio
 10 ausil
 10 mmcgrath
 10 santosp_ricky_mmcgrath
 14 nigelj
 14 ricky
 14 sysadmin-hosted-members
 39 nobody

-Mike

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Wordpress?

2009-03-05 Thread Máirín Duffy

Hey folks,

I was wondering if anyone had interest in setting up a Wordpress MU install for 
Fedora's infrastructure?

Gerold Kassube on the marketing team had this cool idea to set up a blog per 
Fedora foundation (freedom, friends, features, first) and the multiuser 
capabilities of wordpress seem ideal to drive the project. 

Let me know if you have any interest in this. It would be really, really useful 
for Fedora's marketing.

Thanks,
~m



  

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Wordpress?

2009-03-05 Thread Clint Savage
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.org wrote:

 Hey folks,

 I was wondering if anyone had interest in setting up a Wordpress MU install 
 for Fedora's infrastructure?

 Gerold Kassube on the marketing team had this cool idea to set up a blog per 
 Fedora foundation (freedom, friends, features, first) and the multiuser 
 capabilities of wordpress seem ideal to drive the project.

 Let me know if you have any interest in this. It would be really, really 
 useful for Fedora's marketing.

 Thanks,
 ~m

I'd like you to sell me on the reason for four different blogs
(essentially what WP-MU gives) as I've set up WP-MU before and it's
pretty easy...

My concern is that it would be just as easy to create topics in one
blog and just customize pages to pull based upon topic.  Pretty easy
to do actually.

So anyway, if you can make a good argument for MU, I'd love to help.

Clint

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Wordpress?

2009-03-05 Thread Mike McGrath
On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Clint Savage wrote:

 On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
 
  Hey folks,
 
  I was wondering if anyone had interest in setting up a Wordpress MU install 
  for Fedora's infrastructure?
 
  Gerold Kassube on the marketing team had this cool idea to set up a blog 
  per Fedora foundation (freedom, friends, features, first) and the multiuser 
  capabilities of wordpress seem ideal to drive the project.
 
  Let me know if you have any interest in this. It would be really, really 
  useful for Fedora's marketing.
 
  Thanks,
  ~m

 I'd like you to sell me on the reason for four different blogs
 (essentially what WP-MU gives) as I've set up WP-MU before and it's
 pretty easy...

 My concern is that it would be just as easy to create topics in one
 blog and just customize pages to pull based upon topic.  Pretty easy
 to do actually.

 So anyway, if you can make a good argument for MU, I'd love to help.


actually MU was picked a long time ago, just no one has had time to set it
up.

-Mike___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Wordpress?

2009-03-05 Thread Clint Savage
2009/3/5 Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com:
 On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Clint Savage wrote:

 On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
 
  Hey folks,
 
  I was wondering if anyone had interest in setting up a Wordpress MU 
  install for Fedora's infrastructure?
 
  Gerold Kassube on the marketing team had this cool idea to set up a blog 
  per Fedora foundation (freedom, friends, features, first) and the 
  multiuser capabilities of wordpress seem ideal to drive the project.
 
  Let me know if you have any interest in this. It would be really, really 
  useful for Fedora's marketing.
 
  Thanks,
  ~m

 I'd like you to sell me on the reason for four different blogs
 (essentially what WP-MU gives) as I've set up WP-MU before and it's
 pretty easy...

 My concern is that it would be just as easy to create topics in one
 blog and just customize pages to pull based upon topic.  Pretty easy
 to do actually.

 So anyway, if you can make a good argument for MU, I'd love to help.


 actually MU was picked a long time ago, just no one has had time to set it
 up.

        -Mike
 ___

Mike,

Do you have a link to the mailing list thread?  I'd like to read up on
it.  I like MU, don't get me wrong, just wonder why it was chosen.

Clint

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


RE: F10 installation on Hp laptop(dv5-1210tx)

2009-03-05 Thread Ray Ward
Ok.
Do you have a connection such as broadband?
It seems your first problem is getting connected to the internet.
I think you need to setup a wired link to your router first with DHCP
enable and see what happens.
There are no security settings so you should just connect.  From there
we can proceed with the other problems.

Let the updater update everything.

Regards

On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 13:06 +0530, Gyan PRAKASH wrote:
 In Add/Remove packages, I’m not able view anything. It says, “unable
 to load the package view list, it should be done at backend”.
 
  
 
 Is it because I’m not able connect to internet, and the list has to be
 downloaded from http server?
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 

 __
 
 From: Ray Ward [mailto:rayfw...@sky.com] 
 Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 1:26 PM
 To: Gyan PRAKASH
 Cc: 'Miguel Angel Perez'; fedora-laptop-list@redhat.com
 Subject: RE: F10 installation on Hp laptop(dv5-1210tx)
 
 
 
  
 
 Look in Add/remove packages and search for Pulse.
 The first item should be this.
 Enable pulseaudio support in KDE.
 
 It's unlikely  the Nvidia driver would stop sound working.
 
 On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 10:40 +0530, Gyan PRAKASH wrote: 
 
 After installing NVIDIA graphics
 drivers(NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-180.35-pkg1.run) sound is not working!!! 
 
  
 
  
 
 

  
  
  From: gyan prakash [mailto:gyan.prak...@st.com] 
  Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:35 AM
  To: 'Miguel Angel Perez'; 'fedora-laptop-list@redhat.com'
  Subject: RE: F10 installation on Hp laptop(dv5-1210tx)
  
  
  
   
  
   
  
  Hello,
  
   
  
  My laptop multimedia-keys(HP smart keys) works fine in GNOME desktop
  but doesn’t work with KDE.
  
   
  
  Also, Internet is not getting configured. When I plugin the LAN
  wire, it says connected and the ip address displayed is different to
  what I see in windows. I have a external modem connected to
  broadband service provider.
  
   
  
  Please provide suggestion to configure the above.
  
   
  
  Thanks,
  
  Gyan
  
   
  
   
  
   
  
  

  
  
  From: Miguel Angel Perez [mailto:mang...@gmail.com] 
  Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 5:48 PM
  To: Gyan PRAKASH
  Subject: Re: F10 installation on Hp laptop(dv5-1210tx)
  
  
  
   
  
  Rpmfusion is easy to set up: http://rpmfusion.org/Configuration/
  
  The nvidia-driver is propietary but you are allowed to use it as you
  own the card, so you sould not care about licensing issues about it.
  Only philosofical issues for being using a propietary binary thing
  into your free kernel.
  
  The audio card can be a problem. You first have to identify the
  chipset and know if alsa supports it, you can start in alsa's web
  site instructions for new alsa users:
  http://www.alsa-project.org/main/index.php/Main_Page
  
  Good luck!
  
  2009/2/27 Gyan PRAKASH gyan.prak...@st.com
  
  Hey, but am more worried about the Audio card. I tried with F10 KDE
  live CD but no sound was audible! Also how do I get rpm-fusion usage
  license?
  
   
  
  Is their any alternate method to get sound working on my laptop?
  
   
  
   
  
  

  
  
  From: Miguel Angel Perez [mailto:mang...@gmail.com] 
  Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 5:20 PM
  To: Gyan PRAKASH
  Cc: fedora-laptop-list@redhat.com; gyan...@yahoo.com
  Subject: Re: F10 installation on Hp laptop(dv5-1210tx)
  
  
  
   
  
  Nvidia graphics will be supported if you use rpm fusion non-free
  repository, the processor is supported, the touchpad too, the
  network card too, but the tv tunner the audo codec and the HP
  MeadiaSmart thing should be check before. The best thing is trying
  first with a live cd and check that everything works out of the box.
  With a live cd you should not have proper video aceleration as it
  will use the default nv driver for your nvidia card until you set up
  rpmfusion and install nvidia propietary kernel, so don't worry about
  the video performance.
  
  
  
  2009/2/27 Gyan PRAKASH gyan.prak...@st.com
  
  
  
  Hello,
  
   
  
  Hey, did anyone tried Fedora(F10) on HP dv5-1210tx laptop. Following
  are the specs of my laptop
  
   
  
  
  
  1.  Intel Core 2 Duo 2Ghz
  
  2.  NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS/9600M GT Video/Graphic
  
  3.  Synaptics PS/2 Port TouchPad
  
  4.  HP Integrated Digital TV Tuner
  
  5.  IDT High-Definition Audio CODEC
  
  6.  Realtek PCI-E Fast Ethernet NIC
  
  7.  HP MediaSmart
  
   
  
  Am scared of whether the above mentioned sound/graphics and network
  hardware’s would work or NOT? Please provide feedback!
  
   
  
   
  
  Regards,
  
  Gyan
  

  
   
  

RE: F10 installation on Hp laptop(dv5-1210tx)

2009-03-05 Thread Gyan PRAKASH
Yes I do have a broadband connected to external modem. When I pug-in the LAN 
cable, it says connected, but nothing works! I verified the ip-address but it’s 
not the one which I get while running vista. 

 

I need a detail diagnose procedure to catch the problem.

 

  _  

From: Ray Ward [mailto:rayfw...@sky.com] 
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:31 PM
To: Gyan PRAKASH
Cc: fedora-laptop-list@redhat.com
Subject: RE: F10 installation on Hp laptop(dv5-1210tx)

 

Ok.
Do you have a connection such as broadband?
It seems your first problem is getting connected to the internet.
I think you need to setup a wired link to your router first with DHCP enable 
and see what happens.
There are no security settings so you should just connect.  From there we can 
proceed with the other problems.

Let the updater update everything.

Regards

On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 13:06 +0530, Gyan PRAKASH wrote: 

In Add/Remove packages, I’m not able view anything. It says, “unable to load 
the package view list, it should be done at backend”.

 

Is it because I’m not able connect to internet, and the list has to be 
downloaded from http server?

 

 

 


  _  


From: Ray Ward [mailto:rayfw...@sky.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 1:26 PM
To: Gyan PRAKASH
Cc: 'Miguel Angel Perez'; fedora-laptop-list@redhat.com
Subject: RE: F10 installation on Hp laptop(dv5-1210tx)



 

Look in Add/remove packages and search for Pulse.
The first item should be this.
Enable pulseaudio support in KDE.

It's unlikely  the Nvidia driver would stop sound working.

On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 10:40 +0530, Gyan PRAKASH wrote: 

After installing NVIDIA graphics drivers(NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-180.35-pkg1.run) 
sound is not working!!! 

 

 


  _  


From: gyan prakash [mailto:gyan.prak...@st.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:35 AM
To: 'Miguel Angel Perez'; 'fedora-laptop-list@redhat.com'
Subject: RE: F10 installation on Hp laptop(dv5-1210tx)



 

 

Hello,

 

My laptop multimedia-keys(HP smart keys) works fine in GNOME desktop but 
doesn’t work with KDE.

 

Also, Internet is not getting configured. When I plugin the LAN wire, it says 
connected and the ip address displayed is different to what I see in windows. I 
have a external modem connected to broadband service provider.

 

Please provide suggestion to configure the above.

 

Thanks,

Gyan

 

 

 


  _  


From: Miguel Angel Perez [mailto:mang...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 5:48 PM
To: Gyan PRAKASH
Subject: Re: F10 installation on Hp laptop(dv5-1210tx)



 

Rpmfusion is easy to set up: http://rpmfusion.org/Configuration/

The nvidia-driver is propietary but you are allowed to use it as you own the 
card, so you sould not care about licensing issues about it. Only philosofical 
issues for being using a propietary binary thing into your free kernel.

The audio card can be a problem. You first have to identify the chipset and 
know if alsa supports it, you can start in alsa's web site instructions for new 
alsa users: http://www.alsa-project.org/main/index.php/Main_Page

Good luck!

2009/2/27 Gyan PRAKASH gyan.prak...@st.com

Hey, but am more worried about the Audio card. I tried with F10 KDE live CD but 
no sound was audible! Also how do I get rpm-fusion usage license?

 

Is their any alternate method to get sound working on my laptop?

 

 


  _  


From: Miguel Angel Perez [mailto:mang...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 5:20 PM
To: Gyan PRAKASH
Cc: fedora-laptop-list@redhat.com; gyan...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: F10 installation on Hp laptop(dv5-1210tx)



 

Nvidia graphics will be supported if you use rpm fusion non-free repository, 
the processor is supported, the touchpad too, the network card too, but the tv 
tunner the audo codec and the HP MeadiaSmart thing should be check before. The 
best thing is trying first with a live cd and check that everything works out 
of the box. With a live cd you should not have proper video aceleration as it 
will use the default nv driver for your nvidia card until you set up rpmfusion 
and install nvidia propietary kernel, so don't worry about the video 
performance.



2009/2/27 Gyan PRAKASH gyan.prak...@st.com



Hello,

 

Hey, did anyone tried Fedora(F10) on HP dv5-1210tx laptop. Following are the 
specs of my laptop

 



1.  Intel Core 2 Duo 2Ghz

2.  NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS/9600M GT Video/Graphic

3.  Synaptics PS/2 Port TouchPad

4.  HP Integrated Digital TV Tuner

5.  IDT High-Definition Audio CODEC

6.  Realtek PCI-E Fast Ethernet NIC

7.  HP MediaSmart

 

Am scared of whether the above mentioned sound/graphics and network hardware’s 
would work or NOT? Please provide feedback!

 

 

Regards,

Gyan


 

 


 

 

 



 






 

 


 


 

 





 






 





 






 

 


 

 

 



 






 

 


 

 

 



 







 




___
Fedora-laptop-list mailing list
Fedora-laptop-list@redhat.com

[Fedora-legal-list] Openstreetmap moving to Open Database License (ODbL)

2009-03-05 Thread Andrea Musuruane
Hi,
Openstreetmap project is about to change their license from
CC-BY-SA to ODbL:

http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2009-February/001958.html
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Open_Database_License

The Openstreetmap foundation has opened a discussion about the
license. It will end on March, 20th. It intends to publish the
definitive license on March, 28th.

Therefore I'd like to know if this license would permit to include
Openstreetmap contents (e.g. maps) in the Fedora Project or if it has
some problems.

I think that it would be very useful if problems could arise now that
the license is not yet released or used.

Bye,

Andrea.

___
Fedora-legal-list mailing list
Fedora-legal-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list


Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Openstreetmap moving to Open Database License (ODbL)

2009-03-05 Thread Tom spot Callaway
On 03/05/2009 06:19 AM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
 Hi,
 Openstreetmap project is about to change their license from
 CC-BY-SA to ODbL:
 
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2009-February/001958.html
 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Open_Database_License
 
 The Openstreetmap foundation has opened a discussion about the
 license. It will end on March, 20th. It intends to publish the
 definitive license on March, 28th.
 
 Therefore I'd like to know if this license would permit to include
 Openstreetmap contents (e.g. maps) in the Fedora Project or if it has
 some problems.
 
 I think that it would be very useful if problems could arise now that
 the license is not yet released or used.

I really don't want to subscribe to another mailing list... would you be
willing to relay comments to the Open Data Commons people?

Looking at the Factual Information License, I've got some concerns. I
asked Red Hat Legal to take a look at it, and this was their reply:

I think the problem with this one is that the definition of Use
introduces some 
fundamental uncertainty.  If it really means any act that is
restricted by copyright, and
this license does seem to be trying to be a copyright license, then
there ought to be no
problem, since Use should encompass any act of modification that is
restricted by
applicable copyright -- e.g. rights to create derivative works under
U.S. copyright law.
However, then they bother to say modifying the Work as may be
technically necessary
to use it in a different mode or format.  That sounds like they might
be implying that
broader acts of modification are not within the scope of Use, despite
the apparent
reach of the first part of the definition.  And if Use does indeed
encompass only a
proper subset of copyright-law modification acts, then it would be
non-free. While in
general that wouldn't necessarily be true, but here the narrow
interpretation suggests it
is non-free because the apparently-granted modification rights are too
limited.

In addition, I'm concerned that there does not appear to be any explicit
grant of permission to redistribute content under the Factual
Information License without restriction.

(RH Legal is still looking at the ODBL, they should have comments on
that later, which I will pass along).

Thanks in advance,

~spot

___
Fedora-legal-list mailing list
Fedora-legal-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list


Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Openstreetmap moving to Open Database License (ODbL)

2009-03-05 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 Therefore I'd like to know if this license would permit to include
 Openstreetmap contents (e.g. maps) in the Fedora Project or if it has
 some problems.

 Looking at the Factual Information License, I've got some concerns. I
 asked Red Hat Legal to take a look at it, and this was their reply:

[snip]

 (RH Legal is still looking at the ODBL, they should have comments on
 that later, which I will pass along).

Thank you Andrea for bringing this issue here, and thank you Tom for
looking at it.

I'm currently developing shomyu (which might eventually get its way
into Fedora one day) and it uses OSM data, so I'm really concerned
about this licensing change.

/me blesses the day he decided to join this list

Regards,


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

___
Fedora-legal-list mailing list
Fedora-legal-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list


[Fedora-legal-list] Do we need to remove proprietary code from previous releases?

2009-03-05 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
Recently I took over the orphaned package libzzub in F-10 and devel. I
found that the upstream renamed the package to armstrong, so I opened
a review request for armstrong and it just got approved.

But whenever I was packaging armstrong, I found that the source
tarball contains some MS propriatary code. This code does not get
compiled into the final binary RPM but I removed it from the tarball
when I created the SRPM. libzzub is now going through the
PackageEndOfLife process and will be removed from F-10 and devel soon.

The thing is, the old package libzzub that is in F-7, F-8 and F-9
still has this code in the SRPM. How shall we proceed in this case?

Orcan

PS: Specifically, the directory src/rtaudio/include needs to be
removed from the libzzub tarball.

___
Fedora-legal-list mailing list
Fedora-legal-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list


Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Do we need to remove proprietary code from previous releases?

2009-03-05 Thread Tom spot Callaway
On 03/05/2009 02:36 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
 Recently I took over the orphaned package libzzub in F-10 and devel. I
 found that the upstream renamed the package to armstrong, so I opened
 a review request for armstrong and it just got approved.
 
 But whenever I was packaging armstrong, I found that the source
 tarball contains some MS propriatary code. This code does not get
 compiled into the final binary RPM but I removed it from the tarball
 when I created the SRPM. libzzub is now going through the
 PackageEndOfLife process and will be removed from F-10 and devel soon.
 
 The thing is, the old package libzzub that is in F-7, F-8 and F-9
 still has this code in the SRPM. How shall we proceed in this case?

Push updates for any non EOL branches without the proprietary gunk. In
this case, F-9, since F-10 and devel are being taken care of by armstrong.

~spot

___
Fedora-legal-list mailing list
Fedora-legal-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list


[Fedora-legal-list] Legality of staple / unstaple

2009-03-05 Thread Michel Salim
staple / unstaple is an all-or-nothing data binder / unbinder,
licensed under the BSD license.

http://sysnet.ucsd.edu/projects/staple/

The author raises a concern that unstaple might be considered illegal
due to its ability to brute-force the stapled file, and the FAQ listed
some use cases involving misappropriation of intellectual property
(the pirated file is combined with the author's own files, stapled
together, and attempts to unstaple this collection arguably violates
the DMCA).

In view of this, staple is shipped separately from unstaple. Would
either, or both, be acceptable in Fedora? Could we get staple in
Fedora and unstaple in some non-US repositories?

This software has been discussed on Bruce Schneier's blog:
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/03/all-or-nothing.html#comments

Thanks,

-- 
miʃel salim  •  http://hircus.jaiku.com/
IUCS •  msa...@cs.indiana.edu
Fedora   •  sali...@fedoraproject.org
MacPorts •  hir...@macports.org

___
Fedora-legal-list mailing list
Fedora-legal-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list


[Fedora-legal-list] enabling CUDA support

2009-03-05 Thread Milos Jakubicek

Hi all,

I've following bugreport from a BOINC user:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487981

Basically, CUDA is a Nvidia technology which enables the GPU to be used 
for various complex scientific computations (which are then even faster 
than on CPU).


I was about to close the bug as WONTFIX as the whole CUDA is not open 
source, but then I found out that BOINC (which recently added support 
for CUDA applications) needs only the single libcudart.so library and 
that this prebuilt library coming from Nvidia has been already included 
in the source tarball (but not packaged as far).


Now I have a question: as it principally enables the hardware to be 
controlled by some end-user applications, would it be possible to ship 
the libcudart.so library in a subpackage as Redistributable, no 
modification permitted like a firmware?


Actually this is what the Nvidia's EULA is saying about the Linux part 
of CUDA:

http://developer.download.nvidia.com/compute/cuda/2_1/toolkit/CUDA_Toolkit_EULA_081215.pdf
(see section 2.1.3)

Although I guess we can't do it in this way (I'm afraid that same 
arguments could then be used for e.g. all closed-source modules), I 
rather ask before definitely closing the bugreport.


Regards,
Milos

___
Fedora-legal-list mailing list
Fedora-legal-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list


Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Do we need to remove proprietary code from previous releases?

2009-03-05 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
 On 03/05/2009 02:36 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
 Recently I took over the orphaned package libzzub in F-10 and devel. I
 found that the upstream renamed the package to armstrong, so I opened
 a review request for armstrong and it just got approved.

 But whenever I was packaging armstrong, I found that the source
 tarball contains some MS propriatary code. This code does not get
 compiled into the final binary RPM but I removed it from the tarball
 when I created the SRPM. libzzub is now going through the
 PackageEndOfLife process and will be removed from F-10 and devel soon.

 The thing is, the old package libzzub that is in F-7, F-8 and F-9
 still has this code in the SRPM. How shall we proceed in this case?

 Push updates for any non EOL branches without the proprietary gunk. In
 this case, F-9, since F-10 and devel are being taken care of by armstrong.

 ~spot


Done.

Orcan

___
Fedora-legal-list mailing list
Fedora-legal-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list


Re: FC10, Virtualization , Windows XP

2009-03-05 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 12:54:47AM +, M A Young wrote:
 But they aren't all as slow as vmware, nor is hardware virtualization  
 required for a faster solution, for example Xen does very well without  
 needing hardware support.

Xen can't virtualize Windows without hardware support.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat  http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines.  Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: FC10, Virtualization , Windows XP

2009-03-05 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 07:09:04PM -0500, Jim wrote:
 FC 10/KDE
 what is the best Virtualization program for FC10, to run Windows XP in.
 I understand because my AMD Athlon doesn't have a svm feature I can't  
 run KVM, and VM Ware is slow ?

There's no good solution.  You will be able to run qemu, in software
emulation mode.  Depending on how fast your processor is, and how CPU
intensive your Windows session is, it'll be either acceptably slow or
very slow indeed.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat  http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines.  Boot with a
live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into Xen guests.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-p2v

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Dual monitors KDE 4.2 - no panel, no keyboard focus

2009-03-05 Thread Anthony Messina
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 12:51:58 Michael Eager wrote:
 Hi --

 I have dual monitors using Nvidia Twinview.  I
 have both displays working.  The primary display has
 the panel, plasmoids, etc.  It seems to work OK.

 The secondary display only shows wallpaper.  Mouse
 clicks on the screen are ignored.

 I can start a program on the second display by running
 a command in the primary display: DISPLAY=:0.1 konsole
 but this screen does not take keyboard focus.  Doing
 the same with konqueror, the mouse works, but again
 the keyboard is inactive.  Neither of these windows has
 taskbars at the top, so they cannot be moved.

 Running GNOME, the dual display works OK, with both
 screens active.

i'm trying to kick the nvidia habit on  my desktops, so i'm using nouveau, but 
the simplest xorg.conf i have is:

Section ServerLayout
Identifier Default Layout
Screen  0  Screen0 0 0
EndSection

Section Monitor
Identifier   DVI-I-0
Option   LeftOf VGA-0
Option   PreferredMode 1680x1050
EndSection

Section Monitor
Identifier   VGA-0
Option   PreferredMode 1280x1024
EndSection

Section Device
Identifier  Device0
Driver  nouveau
EndSection

Section Screen
Identifier Screen0
Device Device0
DefaultDepth 24
SubSection Display
Depth 24
EndSubSection
EndSection

Section Extensions
Option  Composite Disable
EndSection

And it works like a charm and givesme two separate workspaces in KDE.  -A

-- 
Anthony - http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery
8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

xrander and big screen

2009-03-05 Thread David Hláčik

Hello guys,

I have laptop with ATI radeon. I am using fglrx drivers from rpmfusion, 
which claims to support xrandr.

My laptop has 1440x900 , My LCD attached via DVI has 1280x1204.

I am trying to use dual sceen with big desktop. Yes I can achieve it via 
display config, or with xrandr switches via console.


The main problem is , that X server treates that as a one big desktop 
screen. When I resize window on full deskop, it is resized over 2 displays.
This is not wanted scenario of couse. I want to behave as usual - resize to 
the actuall display, not both.


Please help

PS : this works normal when using open source driver, but I need 3D for 
development in OpenGL. My card is Radeon HD2400, unsupported 3D by 
opensource driver.


Thanks in advance,

David 


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re:rythmbox not seeing cdrom

2009-03-05 Thread DB

fedora-list-requ...@redhat.com wrote:

   3. Re: rythmbox not seeing cdrom (Kevin Kofler)
  
Message: 2

Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 01:55:25 +0100
From: Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
Subject: Re:rythmbox not seeing cdrom
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Message-ID: gokjht$m8...@ger.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

DB wrote:
  

Yup, I have the same problem with Amarok - it did play one CD for me
last week when I first installed it, but now all it finds is a couple of
clips (that I didn't know I'd made) which it calls my local collection.
(and identifies them as something totally unrelated to the actual music.)



What version of Amarok? Amarok 2 does not support CDs at this time.

  


Yes, Amarok 2 - which doesn't appear to want to make any noise from 
Streaming broadcasts, but that is another problem for another day!

Kevin Kofler



--

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 01:56:22 +0100
From: Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
Subject: Re: rythmbox not seeing cdrom
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Message-ID: gokjjm$m8...@ger.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

DB wrote:
  

Curiouser  curiouser... Kaffeine sees  plays CDs in the master drive,
but not in the slave...



If you use a CD drive other than the default, you have to give Kaffeine its
device name in the advanced xine parameters.
  
I've looked in there, but all that is listed is /dev/cdrom. If I look in 
/dev, there is a cdrom1 device, but putting /dev/cdrom1 into the audio 
cd box doesn't appear to change anything.

Kevin Kofler


  

Thanks, Kevin

Dave

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: How to re-lock ssh private key?

2009-03-05 Thread Todd Zullinger
Gordon Messmer wrote:
 I believe the documentation wasn't written because services were
 intended to be identical to ssh-agent.

The problem is that it is configured in very different ways than
ssh-agent.  So it requires it's own documentation.

And further, the services are a long way from identical. :)

 The ssh-add tool can still be used to add and remove identities,
 and has its own man page.

Sure, and I find that many of the things documented to work in the
ssh-add manpage do not work with the ssh agent provided by gnome
keyring.

Are you able to remove identities from the gnome provided agent?  I am
not.  Not with the -d or -D switch.

$ ssh-add -l
1024 61:34:65:0b:eb:cb:2b:83:cf:e2:3d:e9:9f:2f:c5:d3 id_dsa (DSA)
2048 27:c0:40:7c:f2:e5:4b:20:23:6b:19:2a:af:11:e7:6c id_rsa (RSA)

$ ssh-add -D
All identities removed.

$ ssh-add -l
1024 61:34:65:0b:eb:cb:2b:83:cf:e2:3d:e9:9f:2f:c5:d3 id_dsa (DSA)
2048 27:c0:40:7c:f2:e5:4b:20:23:6b:19:2a:af:11:e7:6c id_rsa (RSA)

Same for the -t option to have an identity expire, as well as the -x
option to lock the agent.  In the case of the -x option, ssh-add
prompts for a password to lock the agent and then reports Agent
locked.  Yet the keys continue to be usable to login to remote
systems.

Unless I'm doing something very wrong (which is always a possible),
the gnome provided ssh agent is lacking a great many ways.

Perhaps worst of all, I have been unable to disable the gnome ssh
agent using the methods at http://live.gnome.org/GnomeKeyring/Ssh .
So what little documentation there is appears to be inaccurate. :(

-- 
ToddOpenPGP - KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~
Hell is paved with good samaritans.
-- William M. Holden



pgpoGz04jSbEe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: How to re-lock ssh private key?

2009-03-05 Thread Todd Zullinger
I wrote:
 Are you able to remove identities from the gnome provided agent?  I
 am not.  Not with the -d or -D switch.

 $ ssh-add -l
 1024 61:34:65:0b:eb:cb:2b:83:cf:e2:3d:e9:9f:2f:c5:d3 id_dsa (DSA)
 2048 27:c0:40:7c:f2:e5:4b:20:23:6b:19:2a:af:11:e7:6c id_rsa (RSA)

 $ ssh-add -D
 All identities removed.

 $ ssh-add -l
 1024 61:34:65:0b:eb:cb:2b:83:cf:e2:3d:e9:9f:2f:c5:d3 id_dsa (DSA)
 2048 27:c0:40:7c:f2:e5:4b:20:23:6b:19:2a:af:11:e7:6c id_rsa (RSA)

And to be clear, I am able to use these keys without any new
passphrase prompting.

-- 
ToddOpenPGP - KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~
Annoy government spooks, encrypt all your trivial email



pgppsyf0OuojP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: Text editor won't let me edit conf files. How do I?

2009-03-05 Thread phil

Kevin Kofler wrote:

Rangeen Basu wrote:

you can also use this command:

su -c 'gedit /etc/your_file.conf'
Password:


Using su with GUI apps can lead to X11 sockets and the like getting wrong
permissions and screwing up that user's configuration. YMMV.

Kevin Kofler



hence my total confusion as to why fedora no longer ships gksu??

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Text editor won't let me edit conf files. How do I?

2009-03-05 Thread Rahul Sundaram

phil wrote:

Kevin Kofler wrote:

Rangeen Basu wrote:

you can also use this command:

su -c 'gedit /etc/your_file.conf'
Password:


Using su with GUI apps can lead to X11 sockets and the like getting wrong
permissions and screwing up that user's configuration. YMMV.

Kevin Kofler



hence my total confusion as to why fedora no longer ships gksu??


Fedora has never shipped gksu ever. Applications in Fedora uses either 
consolehelper or policykit. You might try beesu instead.


Rahul

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Something is Fishy About My Network

2009-03-05 Thread Timothy Murphy
Marc Ferguson wrote:

 So here's the meat of my cry-for-help caserole.
 
- I'm having a problem pinging my hostname.  I'll ping it and 127.0.0.1
is the resulting IP.
- I see that my router has given my computer an IP address, but it
doesn't have the hostname in its table.
- I can't ping, by host name, my computer from any other computer on 
the
home network.

You can set the name of your computer in /etc/sysconfig/network ; mine reads

NETWORKING=yes
HOSTNAME=mary.gayleard.com

Also check /etc/hosts on all the computers in your network.

ifconfig will tell you what IP address has been assigned to your machine
by dhcpd;
you can probably change this by editing /etc/dhcpd.conf on the machine
acting as dhcpd server, eg I have

host elizabeth {
hardware ethernet 00:02:2D:21:03:E7;
fixed-address 192.168.2.11;
}


-- 
Timothy Murphy  
e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Text editor won't let me edit conf files. How do I?

2009-03-05 Thread phil

Rahul Sundaram wrote:

phil wrote:

Kevin Kofler wrote:

Rangeen Basu wrote:

you can also use this command:

su -c 'gedit /etc/your_file.conf'
Password:


Using su with GUI apps can lead to X11 sockets and the like getting 
wrong

permissions and screwing up that user's configuration. YMMV.

Kevin Kofler



hence my total confusion as to why fedora no longer ships gksu??


Fedora has never shipped gksu ever. Applications in Fedora uses either 
consolehelper or policykit. You might try beesu instead.


Rahul



yep seems like my memory is starting to fail, i was remembering my 
debian days, pity i can't stick some new ram in my head to replace the 
broken bits lol


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


suddenly a wifi problem stops F10 to complete startup

2009-03-05 Thread 于根

Hi,

everything was runnning fine - until yesterday night when I got this  
error message, once the white progress bar of F10 has finished and  
the screen usually goes black again


ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
iwlagn :06:00.0 PCI INT A - GSI 17 (level, low) - IRQ 17
firmware : requesting iwlwifi-5000-1.ucode
Registered led device : iwl-phy0:radio
Registered led device : iwl-phy0:assoc
Registered led device : iwl-phy0:RX
Registered led device : iwl-phy0:TX
ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready
ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlan: link becomes ready

and there it sits...

I believe I have seen the first 3 lines flashing very shortly usually  
during startup. I do not how to fix this. I also don't get it why the  
OS should stop booting there.


Jurgen

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Automounting Windows Partitions

2009-03-05 Thread Craig Preston
On my F10 box, it automatically mounts my Windows partitions as well. I
would like to change it, so that one of the partitions isn't mounted at all,
and the other is only in read only. I thought this was set in the fstab
file, but I can't see it. Where can I change the automount settings.

Cheers
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: Automounting Windows Partitions

2009-03-05 Thread Tim
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 22:02 +1000, Craig Preston wrote:
 On my F10 box, it automatically mounts my Windows partitions as well.
 I would like to change it, so that one of the partitions isn't mounted
 at all, and the other is only in read only. I thought this was set in
 the fstab file, but I can't see it. Where can I change the automount
 settings.
 
I haven't tried Fedora 10 yet, but in Fedora 9:  There's an
authorisations (personal system) preferences in Gnome which can diddle
whether partitions will be added without you typing in a password again
(e.g. it can be a once off, then it's always auto mounted, it can
require a password every time it's mounted, etc.).

And, if you want something mounted read-only, all the time, you can add
an entry to the fstab file for it.  Then, the auto-mounter won't do
anything with it.

Syntax:  /dev   /mountpoint  fileysystemtype  options

e.g. /dev/sdb3   /mnt/windows fat32  ro

Change the parameters to suit your own situation.  See the man files for
mount and fstab, at least.

Tip:  Don't put manually mounted partitions inside /media.  That's where
the auto-mounter does its tricks, and you might pick a fight with it.

-- 
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.15-78.2.23.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Automounting Windows Partitions

2009-03-05 Thread Jay Mistry
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Craig Preston duffma...@gmail.com wrote:
 On my F10 box, it automatically mounts my Windows partitions as well. I
 would like to change it, so that one of the partitions isn't mounted at all,
 and the other is only in read only. I thought this was set in the fstab
 file, but I can't see it. Where can I change the automount settings.

 Cheers

ntfs-config may help.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/ntfs-config.

PS:
Requires ntfs-3g
Uncheck 'Automount Extrenal Drives (ie do not auto-mount external USB
drives using this)

-- 
Registered Linux User # 483705  @ http://counter.li.org/  (openSUSE 11.1, i686)
Smolts Profile:
http://www.smolts.org/client/show/?uuid=pub_b541a450-9bc1-45fd-beab-d46ee43a0108

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: shrinking reiserfs partitions, filesystems

2009-03-05 Thread Roberto Ragusa
Chris Tyler wrote:

 If
 it's not an essential-to-the-system filesystem (e.g., /data or
 something) you can unmount it and resize it

Do not forget another option: copy everything somewhere else
(external USB drive or something...), destroy the partition,
recreate it smaller, format and copy back.

In this way you get an implicit perfect defrag of your data,
which could be more or less useful, depending on the current
fragmentation of your filesystem.

If your data is only 16GB, it will not take too much time
and it's a method which contains a backup operation inside :-)
Actually, with two disks, it could be even faster than
in place resizing.

Best regards.

-- 
   Roberto Ragusamail at robertoragusa.it

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Setting up a home wireless server.

2009-03-05 Thread Mark Haney
James Allsopp wrote:
 hi,
 I'm setting up a wireless access point and I've got the laptop to
 connect to the server, and dhcp working, but I can't get the firewall to
 forward packets to the outside wall. I've seen some people setting up a
 bridging device, but before I've done it using iptables. Is one of these
 methods better, deprecated or just different?
 
 I'm using the iptables script described here;
 http://iptables-tutorial.frozentux.net/iptables-tutorial.html#INCLUDERCFIREWALL
 
 the forward part is here
 $IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $LAN_IFACE -j ACCEPT
 $IPTABLES -A FORWARD -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
 $IPTABLES -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o $INET_IFACE -j SNAT --to-source $INET_IP
 
 But there doesn't seem to be anything to redirect the return packets or
 to tell it which interface the outbound packets should be on.
 
 It says in the tutorial masquerade should be avoided due to the extra
 CPU, any comments?
 
 Thanks,
 Jim
 

Honestly, I've never used IPtables for that, I've always made my server
just act like a router and input static routes between wireless and
wired networks.  But then maybe my case is special, I route all my
wireless packets through my server (and squid) so that I can filter what
my kids get to on the internet.


-- 
Frustra laborant quotquot se calculationibus fatigant pro inventione
quadraturae circuli

Mark Haney
Sr. Systems Administrator
ERC Broadband
(828) 350-2415

Call (866) ERC-7110 for after hours support

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Perl modules --- Fedora RPMs (Test::More)

2009-03-05 Thread Dave Cross
2009/3/4 Geoffrey Leach ge...@hughes.net:
 On 03/04/2009 11:12:33 AM, Dave Cross wrote:
 2009/3/4 Reber, Simon simon.re...@roche.com:
  I suggest to download the tar.gz package from http://www.cpan.de
 and
 install it using:
         perl Makefile.PL
         make
         make install

 Firstly, if you're going to point someone at CPAN then please use the
 canonical URL (http://www.cpan.org/) rather than a national mirror.

 Secondly, mixing RPM-installed modules and CPAN-installed modules in
 the same Perl installation is a recipe for disaster. I strongly
 recommend avoiding it whenever possible.

 Actually, that's not the case. Here's what I do. YMMV.

 Install _minimal_ Perl as rpms. That's just perl and whatever comes
 with it on yum install. Then get the CPAN rpm, and whatever comes with
 it.

 After this, use cpan to install whatever you need. The cli interface is
 simple and easy to use. The value of this is that if you install
 (rather than upgrade) new Fedora distos, your cpan-installed modules
 are not affected, always assuming that /usr/local is a separate file
 system.

Yeah, I worked like that for years. But my Perl installations always
gradually deteriorated. Once I switched to RPM-only installations (and
learnt how to make RPMs of CPAN modules that weren't in the
repositories) my life became much happier.

See http://www.slideshare.net/davorg/perl-in-rpmland-presentation for
more details. And http://rpm.mag-sol.com/ for my repository of RPMs of
CPAN modules.

Cheers,

Dave...

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Something is Fishy About My Network

2009-03-05 Thread Matthew Flaschen
Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
 Suggestion #2 (if you are up to it):  Disable DHCP serving in your
 router and setup a DHCP server on a Linux machine.  You can set up the
 dchp.conf file to do everything your touter is doing.  If this machine
 is also running DNS, there are some ways to get them to talk to each
 other so that DNS knows the names of machines served by the DHCP server.
 This is not trivial, and requires in depth knowledge of both protocols
 to get to work right.  Possibly including depricated configuration options.

I think you're overstating the complexity of this.  It shouldn't be that
hard for him to get it working with dnsmasq.  Also, what aspect of the
configuration do you think is deprecated?

Matt Flaschen

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Something is Fishy About My Network

2009-03-05 Thread Marc Ferguson
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Matthew Flaschen
matthew.flasc...@gatech.edu wrote:

 Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
  Suggestion #2 (if you are up to it):  Disable DHCP serving in your
  router and setup a DHCP server on a Linux machine.  You can set up the
  dchp.conf file to do everything your touter is doing.  If this machine
  is also running DNS, there are some ways to get them to talk to each
  other so that DNS knows the names of machines served by the DHCP server.
  This is not trivial, and requires in depth knowledge of both protocols
  to get to work right.  Possibly including depricated configuration options.

 I think you're overstating the complexity of this.  It shouldn't be that
 hard for him to get it working with dnsmasq.  Also, what aspect of the
 configuration do you think is deprecated?

 Matt Flaschen

 --
 fedora-list mailing list
 fedora-list@redhat.com
 To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
 Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Thank you all for your feedback.  I'll try these things out and reply
with more details when I get home.

--
Marc F.

www.fergytech.com
Registered Linux User: #410978

When life gives me lemons... I make Linuxaide, hmm good stuff!

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: How to re-lock ssh private key?

2009-03-05 Thread Wolfgang S. Rupprecht

Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com writes:
 Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
 Another thing that appears not to work with the gnome version of the
 ssh-agent is ssh-add -d or ssh-add -D.  Not good.

 I think you're confused by the fact that the identities are still
 listed by ssh-add -l.  They're certainly deactivated and require a
 passphrase in order to be used again (tested in GNOME 2.24).

No, I'm confused by the fact that I can still ssh to remote machines
without entering my key-unlocking passphrase. ;-)

$ ssh-add -D
All identities removed.
$ ssh localhost
Last login: Thu Mar  5 07:03:01 2009 from localhost
$

-wolfgang
-- 
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht  http://www.full-steam.org/  (ipv6-only)
 You may need to config 6to4 to see the above pages.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Apparent total loss of all Raid 1 data from both drives`

2009-03-05 Thread Robert Karge
HELP!

system: motherboard = ASUS P5Q with INTEL 64 bit  core 2 processor.
memory = 8 gig
Drives in Raid 1 array = 2 Seagate 500 Gb 7200 RPM (Personal Data)
Linux = Fedora 10-64

System has been operating flawlessly for 4 Months.  Raid disks have (had) 2
years of important personal data plus several Virtual Box virtual systems.

While operating normally I was having some access problems so I ran Selinux
Manager to review information then exited.

About an hour later I again ran Selinux Manager and the gui screen frame
work came up but the data panels were empty and none of the
controls were functioning.

My first thought ended up totally wrong, I rebooted.

After the Mushroom cloud cleared F10 would not complete bootup and produced
long lists of similar errors. ERGO 2 years of data (both drives) appear to
be blank.

This situation brings up the pit of the stomach feeling that I do not have
a tool of any kind which will allow me to do my magic of
trouble shooting.  Since the system will not complete booting.

Any help would be very much appreciated.  I have reloaded F10 (on the boot
drive) but both drives from the original Raid 1 still appear to be totally
empty.

It is paradoxical how much the total loss of years of work and data teaches
about better backup functionality.

Thanks for the help.
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: Perl modules --- Fedora RPMs (Test::More)

2009-03-05 Thread Nick Zhokhov

Hi
rpm -ql perl-Test-Simple-0.62-30.fc8.x86_64
...
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/Test/More.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/Test/Simple.pm
...

the problem is that  I can't found perl-Test- Simple  src rpm
spec of which should have something like
Provides: perl-Test-More = 062-30.fc8

There are many spec  having
BuildRequire perl(Test::More)

--Nick Zhokhov

Dave Cross wrote:

2009/3/4 Stanisław T. Findeisen sf181...@students.mimuw.edu.pl:
  

How can I know which RPM in Fedora release contains which Perl modules? In
particular I want to install Test::More, but don't know where to look for
that. :-/



I usually go and search for the module at http://search.cpan.org/.
That'll tell you which CPAN distribution contains the module. Then
it's just a case of translating the CPAN distribution name to an RPM
name.

For example, Test::More is included in the Test-Simple distribution.
The RPM name is therefore perl-Test-Simple.

Dave...

  


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: F10: system-config-services - hangs?

2009-03-05 Thread Daniel B. Thurman

Sam Varshavchik wrote:

Daniel B. Thurman writes:



For some reason or another, I cannot seem to get system-config-services
to work.  It chugs along with the greyed-out (inaccessable) list and 
then

simply hangs.  Killing this app leaves a process around unless killed.

Works fine with F9, but avoiding certain services that causes hangs
but I am not sure what services on F10 would hang this app.

Has this worked for anyone else or is there some services I need to
be aware of that are known to cause hangs of the system-config-services?


system-config-services works for me. It does take quite a few seconds 
to come up and plow through the list.


When it's hanging, attach strace to it and see what the process is doing.


I did a strace pid attachment, nothing interesting revealed, until I 
moved the mouse
around on the GUI and all I got was screen activity data.  Killing SCS 
revealed
nothing relevant.  I started SCS under strace and gawd, just too much 
data, especially

the polling data, that throws much confusion into the mix.

Seems I will have to do brute-force, one-by-one services removal to see 
which one is

the offending service to SCS.

Dan

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Apparent total loss of all Raid 1 data from both drives`

2009-03-05 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 10:26:57 -0500,
  Robert Karge rkargeconsult...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Any help would be very much appreciated.  I have reloaded F10 (on the boot
 drive) but both drives from the original Raid 1 still appear to be totally
 empty.
 
 It is paradoxical how much the total loss of years of work and data teaches
 about better backup functionality.

It is unlikely that you have really lost all of the data based on what you
said you did. You do want to be careful about what you do now so that you
don't make things worse while trying to fix things.
The rescue disk suggestion is probably the way to start.
If you are going to try to do something dangerous, you may want to consider
pulling one of the disks. This has its own set of risks though and you would
want to make sure if you got things back, that you back stuff up before
trying to add the disk back into the raid array.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Computer host name

2009-03-05 Thread James Allsopp
Hi,
I've deactivated NetworkManager as it was interfering with my wireless
networking, but since then my computer has been renamed to
ip-address-bethere.co.uk, instead of localhost.localdomain. I've
looked at /etc/hosts
/etc/sysconfig/network
and these are all set up as localhost.localdomain and the network card
facing the internet is set up statically.

Anyone have any ideas how to stop this happening?
James

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Apparent total loss of all Raid 1 data from both drives`

2009-03-05 Thread Robert Karge
Mogens,

Thank you for the quick response.

1. Software raid

2. The problem of boot not completing and apparently looping through an
error path was a function
of the boot drive only. The error was that some function was running to fast
and was being retried over and over.
The boot process,when started, proceeded through the locating and loading of
the LVM setup.  The failure begain right after that.

3. Yes, however at the time I didn't fully understand how to use it.  I just
tried it out and, sorrowfully, will be able to
use it next time.

4. My system has 1 500Gb SATA drive for boot and Linux basic directories. My
personal information is located on two 500Gb SATA drives in a Raid 1 array.
Using the F10 dist install disk I selected only the boot disk and reloaded
F10. Then reconstructed the Raid 1 array, which I have done successfully
several times, and then added the two Raid drives back to the array.  They
then equalized, which appeared normal, this took several hours.

When that finished I checked for data/directories and there was nothing.  By
nothing I mean no directories, no folders, no data.
All though F10 detected that they were Raid formatted (ext2).

So my only disaster is the seeming loss of some very important stuff. I've
been a software/systems designer for a long time so
even that shall pass.

I hope this helps.

Again thanks for you help.

Bob Karge



On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Mogens Kjaer m...@crc.dk wrote:

 Robert Karge wrote:
 ...
  After the Mushroom cloud cleared F10 would not complete bootup and
 produced
  long lists of similar errors. ERGO 2 years of data (both drives) appear
 to
  be blank.
 ...

 A few questions:

 Is it hardware or software RAID?

 How is your disk setup? I.e., what do you mean by
 reloading F10 on the boot drive?

 Can you boot from the installation CD/DVD in rescue mode?

 How do you see that the data drives are blank?

 Mogens

 --
 Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg A/S, Computer Department
 Gamle Carlsberg Vej 10, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark
 Phone: +45 33 27 53 25, Mobile: +45 22 12 53 25
 Email: m...@crc.dk Homepage: http://www.crc.dk

 --
 fedora-list mailing list
 fedora-list@redhat.com
 To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
 Guidelines:
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: Apparent total loss of all Raid 1 data from both drives`

2009-03-05 Thread Robin Laing

Bruno Wolff III wrote:

On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 10:26:57 -0500,
  Robert Karge rkargeconsult...@gmail.com wrote:

Any help would be very much appreciated.  I have reloaded F10 (on the boot
drive) but both drives from the original Raid 1 still appear to be totally
empty.

It is paradoxical how much the total loss of years of work and data teaches
about better backup functionality.


It is unlikely that you have really lost all of the data based on what you
said you did. You do want to be careful about what you do now so that you
don't make things worse while trying to fix things.
The rescue disk suggestion is probably the way to start.
If you are going to try to do something dangerous, you may want to consider
pulling one of the disks. This has its own set of risks though and you would
want to make sure if you got things back, that you back stuff up before
trying to add the disk back into the raid array.



I will agree with this. statement.

With a 500GB drive, I would use this as a work disk.  I would do an 
install that doesn't look at the RAID drives.  I would actually 
disconnect them.


Now you said that you rebuilt the RAID.  After to did a rebuild, did you 
have the same LVM settings?  I ask  this because I had a real nightmare 
with LVM and a RAID 1 some time ago.  I refuse to use LVM now.


How much data is on the rebuilt array?  What does df give you?

If worse comes to worse, you can use forensic tools to scan your drives 
for data.  I had to do this with my problem.  I put the one drive into a 
USB port and mounted it read only to scan the drive.


The worse thing you can do is panic and rush.  It took me almost a week 
to recover some data after I forgot to back it up when I did a full 
system redesign and rebuild.


Good luck.

--
Robin Laing

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Resolved: kmod-nvidia is missing for kernel 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10

2009-03-05 Thread Rick Stevens

Linuxguy123 wrote:

The kmod-nvidia package for kernel 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10 mysteriously
showed up on my update list this morning.  I have no idea why it took
this long to appear.  I didn't make any changes to my system. 


Whatever happened, this problem is resolved.


Your mirrors probably just got it.  It is well over a week old now (24\
February), so it appears the mirror your machine was choosing was
exceptionally slow in syncing up.  Not much you can do about that except
bring it to the attention of the sysop of the mirror site you used.
--
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer  ri...@nerd.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 22643734Yahoo: origrps2 -
--
-  The problem with being poor is that it takes up all of your time  -
--

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Apparent total loss of all Raid 1 data from both drives`

2009-03-05 Thread Mogens Kjaer

Robert Karge wrote:
...

When that finished I checked for data/directories and there was nothing.  By
nothing I mean no directories, no folders, no data.
All though F10 detected that they were Raid formatted (ext2).

...

What does fdisk -l say on the two drives?

Mogens
--
Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg A/S, Computer Department
Gamle Carlsberg Vej 10, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark
Phone: +45 33 27 53 25, Fax: +45 33 27 47 08
Email: m...@crc.dk Homepage: http://www.crc.dk

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Dual boot WinXP repair (maybe a little OT)

2009-03-05 Thread Aldo Foot
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Matthew Saltzman m...@clemson.edu wrote:
snip
 I'm thinking of jiggering the partitions to put WinXP first again
 and /boot second.  I know how to fix the Linux side when I do that, so
 maybe putting WinXP back will help.  I'd rather not re-install because I
 installed a bunch of stuff on Win before I did this, so it would be
 annoying (not to say awful) to have to do that all over again.

Why not use Gparted to moved partitions around?
You wouldn't have to reinstall.
Also, how about creating a image of the WinXP partition so you can
recover anytime? Store the image in some external media.

 Look here for partimage  and other utilities:
 http://www.sysresccd.org/Main_Page

~af

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Something is Fishy About My Network

2009-03-05 Thread Kevin J. Cummings

Matthew Flaschen wrote:

Kevin J. Cummings wrote:

Suggestion #2 (if you are up to it):  Disable DHCP serving in your
router and setup a DHCP server on a Linux machine.  You can set up the
dchp.conf file to do everything your touter is doing.  If this machine
is also running DNS, there are some ways to get them to talk to each
other so that DNS knows the names of machines served by the DHCP server.
This is not trivial, and requires in depth knowledge of both protocols
to get to work right.  Possibly including depricated configuration options.


I think you're overstating the complexity of this.  It shouldn't be that
hard for him to get it working with dnsmasq.  Also, what aspect of the
configuration do you think is deprecated?


The Linux DHCP server no longer has the right hooks to fix up BIN 
directly.  It needs another tool to help out.  The old way of doing 
that is no longer supported and is deprecated.  At least according to 
the documentation the last time I read it (about 5 years ago).



Matt Flaschen


--
Kevin J. Cummings
kjch...@rcn.com
cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net
cummi...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us
Registered Linux User #1232 (http://counter.li.org)

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Text editor won't let me edit conf files. How do I?

2009-03-05 Thread Linux Media

you can also use this command:

su -c 'gedit /etc/your_file.conf'
Password:



Using su with GUI apps can lead to X11 sockets and the like getting wrong
permissions and screwing up that user's configuration. YMMV.



hence my total confusion as to why fedora no longer ships gksu??


I use kdesu to start programs as root. But I don't know if it's safer 
than other methods or anything like that. But it has worked for me for a 
while.


Rocco

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: How to re-lock ssh private key?

2009-03-05 Thread Todd Zullinger
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:

 Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com writes:
 Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
 Another thing that appears not to work with the gnome version of
 the ssh-agent is ssh-add -d or ssh-add -D.  Not good.

 I think you're confused by the fact that the identities are still
 listed by ssh-add -l.  They're certainly deactivated and require
 a passphrase in order to be used again (tested in GNOME 2.24).

 No, I'm confused by the fact that I can still ssh to remote machines
 without entering my key-unlocking passphrase. ;-)

$ ssh-add -D
All identities removed.
$ ssh localhost
Last login: Thu Mar  5 07:03:01 2009 from localhost
$

Right, this is clearly a gnome-keyring bug.  There are a good number
of them it seems.

Not honoring -c or -t is: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/525574
Inability to disable it is: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/558181

The latter is fixed upstream, but only in the gnome-2.25 branch.  I
don't know if anyone intends to backport the fix to the current stable
branch so F-10 can be updated.  The changes don't apply cleanly, so
it'd take a little bit of work to sort out.

-- 
ToddOpenPGP - KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~
The most important single central fact about a free market is that no
exchange takes place unless both parties benefit.
-- Milton Friedman



pgpopQftuzhpw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

F9 x86_64 - Fritz! WLAN USB - ndiswrapper problem

2009-03-05 Thread Robert Cates

Hi,

I cannot get my Fritz! WLAN USB adapter recognized/installed and therefore WLAN not working with my Fedora 9 x86_64 machine.  Can somebody please tell me where/how I can get/install ndiswrapper?  I suppose i need to add a repository resource to get 'yum install ndiswrapper' to work.?  Or does anybody know of another, maybe better, solution?  


thanks,
Robert

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Computer host name

2009-03-05 Thread Steve

 Rick Stevens ri...@nerd.com wrote: 
 James Allsopp wrote:
  Hi,
  I've deactivated NetworkManager as it was interfering with my wireless
  networking, but since then my computer has been renamed to
  ip-address-bethere.co.uk, instead of localhost.localdomain. I've
  looked at /etc/hosts
  /etc/sysconfig/network
  and these are all set up as localhost.localdomain and the network card
  facing the internet is set up statically.
  
  Anyone have any ideas how to stop this happening?
 
 If you are running a DHCP client (and it looks like you are), the DHCP
 server you're using gave your machine a host name.  That's pretty
 normal.

I don't think that this is true. At least not if you're running dhcp-4.0.0 as I 
am on my F9 system.
$ rpm -qa | grep dhclient
dhclient-4.0.0-22.fc9.x86_64

I had thought the same thing but I recently spent some time sifting through the 
code to try to find where the host name is set. What I found is that it's not 
set by dhclient at all. It is set in the script 
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-post by the ipcalc command which is passed 
the IP address that the DHCP server gives your machine. Essentially this is a 
DNS lookup.

If you know otherwise or if this is not always true, I'd be interested to hear 
about it.

 My guess is that your ISP is bethere.co.uk, therefore they gave you
 a hostname that reflects the IP address they gave you.  That's good,
 generally, because that means they're probably maintaining a reverse DNS
 entry for your IP address that points at you.
 
 You can ignore the host name the DHCP server gives you by editing the
 DHCP client config on your machine and adding
 
   supercede host-name localhost.localdomain;
 
 to the lease clause.  See man dhclient.conf and man dhcp-options.

You can also put

send host-name my_host_name;

in the dhclient.conf file or add

DHCP_HOSTNAME=my_host_name

to /etc/sysconfig/network

Steve

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Something is Fishy About My Network

2009-03-05 Thread Tim
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 13:02 -0500, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
 The Linux DHCP server no longer has the right hooks to fix up BIN

BIND?  (Just in case you're referring to something else that I haven't
guessed at.)
 
 directly.  It needs another tool to help out.  The old way of doing 
 that is no longer supported and is deprecated.  At least according to 
 the documentation the last time I read it (about 5 years ago).

If you mean the DHCP server needs special configuration to update DNS
server records, the previous scheme of allowing clients to do that,
based on what they're address supposedly is, then yes that's out of
date.  Since then, the methodology was to use a shared secrets keyfile
(/etc/rndc.key).

It's not too hard to integrate the BIND name server with the DHCP server
Fedora's using, and the skills learnt in doing so are useful for other
things.  But I think the ease of using dnsmasq is supposed to be that
much of that nitty-gritty work is taken care of already.  It might
depend on what else you want to do, DNS- and DHCP-wise.  You can pull
rabbits out of hats the hard way, I don't know what the limitations of
using dnsmasq might be.

-- 
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.15-78.2.23.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: FC10: Gnome/X focus broken after last update

2009-03-05 Thread Marco Guazzone
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Wed, 4 Mar 2009 16:44:39 +0100, Marco wrote:

  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libgxim-0.3.2-4.fc10

 Unfortunately, the problem was not solved.

 Consider leaving feedback at the page linked above.
 Even if you don't have a Fedora account, you can add a comment.

 I'm also test-driving this new libgxim currently. I reverted to the
 bad libgxim, went to run-level 3 and returned to 5 to get a broken
 xterm. Then I've upgraded to above pkg, init 3 and init 5 once more,
 and it runs fine so far.

 --
 fedora-list mailing list
 fedora-list@redhat.com
 To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
 Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines



I've tried the link above but after clicking on Add comment button I
get the message:

--- [snip] ---
500 Internal error

The server encountered an unexpected condition which prevented it from
fulfilling the request.

Powered by CherryPy 2.3.0
--- [/snip] ---
The URL is: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/captcha_comment

Anyway, I continue to have problems with focus.
Honestly, I don't know if those are caused by libgxim are by other
updated packages

I've re-updated to libgxim 0.3.2-4 (this time donwloaded with yum
update) but the problem still persists, not only for xterm bu also for
FireFox, nautilus, gnome-panel.

For instance, just now, after having clicked on a HTML link on FireFox
the focus frozen, that is_
* the mouse cursor remained the one used by FireFox when you move over
an HTML link,
* even clicking on other FireFox tabs or on the gnome menu, I was not
able to do anything: each window seemed disabled
* for make it working I switched on another virtual desktop
(ctrl+alt+left_arrow) and then returned back to the virtual desktop
(ctrl+alt+right_arrow) where FireFox was open.

Any idea?

Thank you so much!

Cheers,

-- Marco

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Computer host name

2009-03-05 Thread Tim
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 14:22 -0500, Steve wrote:
 I had thought the same thing but I recently spent some time sifting
 through the code to try to find where the host name is set. What I
 found is that it's not set by dhclient at all. It is set in the
 script /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-post by the ipcalc command
 which is passed the IP address that the DHCP server gives your
 machine. Essentially this is a DNS lookup.

In both directions...  DHCP server says here's your IP, or the box has a
static IP set into it.  That IP resolves to this name.  Checking that
name resolves to the same IP.  I am /that/ name.  That's how Linux (and
some services running on the box) works out what its name is, in the
absence of it being fixed some other way (e.g. the user setting a
hostname in a configuration file, regardless of what IP address it gets,
even if that causes problems by using something that doesn't resolve, or
resolves wrongly).

 If you know otherwise or if this is not always true, I'd be interested
 to hear about it.

DHCP clients can tell the DCHP server the name it wants, and DHCP
servers can tell the clients what name it wants them to use.  Neither of
them has to obey.

If you want to fix a name to a box that travels, it's a good idea to
configure the DHCP client to ask for it.  It might help.  But no well
set up server is going to let a client name itself in a manner would
harm a network - such as a rogue box being attached that insists it's
the name server (this being a good admin issue versus bad admin,
people-wise).

On a dynamically configured network, the best approach is centrally
control names and addresses via your DHCP and DNS servers, and have your
clients obey.  You only have one thing to adjust - your server.

-- 
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.15-78.2.23.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Something is Fishy About My Network

2009-03-05 Thread Kevin J. Cummings

Tim wrote:

On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 13:02 -0500, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:

The Linux DHCP server no longer has the right hooks to fix up BIN


BIND?  (Just in case you're referring to something else that I haven't
guessed at.)


Yes, my keyboard and my fingers don't always agree on what I want to type.

directly.  It needs another tool to help out.  The old way of doing 
that is no longer supported and is deprecated.  At least according to 
the documentation the last time I read it (about 5 years ago).


If you mean the DHCP server needs special configuration to update DNS
server records, the previous scheme of allowing clients to do that,
based on what they're address supposedly is, then yes that's out of
date.  Since then, the methodology was to use a shared secrets keyfile
(/etc/rndc.key).

It's not too hard to integrate the BIND name server with the DHCP server
Fedora's using, and the skills learnt in doing so are useful for other
things.  But I think the ease of using dnsmasq is supposed to be that
much of that nitty-gritty work is taken care of already.  It might
depend on what else you want to do, DNS- and DHCP-wise.  You can pull
rabbits out of hats the hard way, I don't know what the limitations of
using dnsmasq might be.


Agreed.

--
Kevin J. Cummings
kjch...@rcn.com
cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net
cummi...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us
Registered Linux User #1232 (http://counter.li.org)

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Something is Fishy About My Network

2009-03-05 Thread Matthew Flaschen
Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
 I think you're overstating the complexity of this.  It shouldn't be that
 hard for him to get it working with dnsmasq.  Also, what aspect of the
 configuration do you think is deprecated?
 
 The Linux DHCP server no longer has the right hooks to fix up BIN
 directly.

There is no single Linux DHCP server.  ISC dhcpd (which I assume
you're referring to) is not the only thing that can provide DHCP.  As I
said, dnsmasq is a good solution here because it's a single program that
can provide integrated DHCP and DNS.

 It needs another tool to help out.

Right, so don't use dhcpd at all.

Matt Flaschen

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: [OT] Free download of Linux Fromat for 24 hours

2009-03-05 Thread g
Jake Peavy wrote:
 On 3/3/09, Steve Searle st...@stevesearle.com wrote:
 http://www.tuxradar.com/content/linux-format-free-download-24-hours-only
 
 Dammit!  Missed it.
 
 Does anyone have a copy they can email me?  The site says we can share with
 friends ;-)

 email 

are you aware that file is approx 130,919,531 bytes?



-- 

peace out.

tc,hago.

g
.


in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
**
help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today
**
to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it;
to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look at* it.
**
learn linux:
'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html
'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/
'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html
'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: [OT] Free download of Linux Fromat for 24 hours

2009-03-05 Thread Jake Peavy
On 3/5/09, g gel...@bellsouth.net wrote:

 Jake Peavy wrote:
  On 3/3/09, Steve Searle st...@stevesearle.com wrote:
 
 http://www.tuxradar.com/content/linux-format-free-download-24-hours-only
 
  Dammit!  Missed it.
 
  Does anyone have a copy they can email me?  The site says we can share
 with
  friends ;-)


  email 

 are you aware that file is approx 130,919,531 bytes?



That had not occurred to us, Dude.

Is it still being seeded?  Does anyone have a tracker?

-- 
-jp

When I was a kid my favorite relative was Uncle Caveman. After school we'd
all go play in his cave, and every once in a while he would eat one of us.
It wasn't until later that I found out that Uncle Caveman was a bear.

deepthoughtsbyjackhandey.com
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Eclipse Java Perspective

2009-03-05 Thread Oliver Ruebenacker
 Hello, All,

  I am running F10 and installed via yum Java and Eclipse, including
eclipse-jdk and java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel.i386. I can run Java and
Eclipse, but there is no Java perspective in Eclipse. Am I missing a
package? Thanks!

 Take care
 Oliver

-- 
Oliver Ruebenacker, Computational Cell Biologist
BioPAX Integration at Virtual Cell (http://vcell.org/biopax)
Center for Cell Analysis and Modeling
http://www.oliver.curiousworld.org

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Eclipse Java Perspective

2009-03-05 Thread Andrew Overholt
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 16:06 -0500, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
 Hello, All,
 
   I am running F10 and installed via yum Java and Eclipse, including
 eclipse-jdk and java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel.i386. I can run Java and
 Eclipse, but there is no Java perspective in Eclipse. Am I missing a
 package? Thanks!

By eclipse-jdk did you mean eclipse-jdt?  There have been a few issues
with configurations in ~/.eclipse not getting cleaned up.  Try mv
~/.eclipse{,.bak20090305} and start eclipse again and see if that helps.

Andrew

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Eclipse Java Perspective

2009-03-05 Thread Caitlyn O'Hanna
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 16:06 -0500, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
 Hello, All,
 
   I am running F10 and installed via yum Java and Eclipse, including
 eclipse-jdk and java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel.i386. I can run Java and
 Eclipse, but there is no Java perspective in Eclipse. Am I missing a
 package? Thanks!

You need eclipse-jdt


--Caitlyn

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Eclipse Java Perspective

2009-03-05 Thread Oliver Ruebenacker
 Hello, Andrew, All,

  Thanks, removing .eclipse helped!

  Yes, I meant eclipse-jdt.

 Take care
 Oliver

On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com wrote:
 On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 16:06 -0500, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
 Hello, All,

   I am running F10 and installed via yum Java and Eclipse, including
 eclipse-jdk and java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel.i386. I can run Java and
 Eclipse, but there is no Java perspective in Eclipse. Am I missing a
 package? Thanks!

 By eclipse-jdk did you mean eclipse-jdt?  There have been a few issues
 with configurations in ~/.eclipse not getting cleaned up.  Try mv
 ~/.eclipse{,.bak20090305} and start eclipse again and see if that helps.

 Andrew

 --
 fedora-list mailing list
 fedora-list@redhat.com
 To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
 Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines




-- 
Oliver Ruebenacker, Computational Cell Biologist
BioPAX Integration at Virtual Cell (http://vcell.org/biopax)
Center for Cell Analysis and Modeling
http://www.oliver.curiousworld.org

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Booting a gazillion linuxes?

2009-03-05 Thread Matthew Flaschen
Tom Horsley wrote:
 Of course I was also trying to make the primary system have
 a very robust grub installation, so I spent a lot of time
 reading about saved defaults and fallbacks in grub only to
 discover that fedora's grub merely ships that in the info
 file, but not in grub itself (sigh...)

That's a bug in the docs.

Matt Flaschen

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: [OT] Free download of Linux Fromat for 24 hours

2009-03-05 Thread Nigel Henry
On Thursday 05 March 2009 21:54, Jake Peavy wrote:
 On 3/5/09, g gel...@bellsouth.net wrote:
  Jake Peavy wrote:
   On 3/3/09, Steve Searle st...@stevesearle.com wrote:
 
  http://www.tuxradar.com/content/linux-format-free-download-24-hours-only
 
   Dammit!  Missed it.
  
   Does anyone have a copy they can email me?  The site says we can share
 
  with
 
   friends ;-)
 
   email 
 
  are you aware that file is approx 130,919,531 bytes?

 That had not occurred to us, Dude.

 Is it still being seeded?  Does anyone have a tracker?

Being a first time user of bittorrent, I'm not sure if this is what you want. 
Anyway, in Transmissions tracker tab, I have the URL below, which is prefixed 
by Tier 1.

http://www.linuxformat.co.uk:6969/announce

Up to a few hours ago, when I found out that my torrent download hadn't 
completed, there were many folks still seeding, and was able to complete the 
download.

I've attached the .torrent file as well, as it's only 9.9KB.

Nigel



linux_format_116.torrent
Description: application/bittorrent
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: Apparent total loss of all Raid 1 data from both drives`

2009-03-05 Thread Robert Karge
Part of my basic trouble shooting is to use fdisk.  I however run the
application and then use the various options.
fdisk -l shows, on both drives, valid partition 1 with a type flag of 'fd'
and text of Linux Raid autodetect

Bob Karge

On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Mogens Kjaer m...@crc.dk wrote:

 Robert Karge wrote:
 ...

 When that finished I checked for data/directories and there was nothing.
  By
 nothing I mean no directories, no folders, no data.
 All though F10 detected that they were Raid formatted (ext2).

 ...

 What does fdisk -l say on the two drives?

 Mogens
 --
 Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg A/S, Computer Department
 Gamle Carlsberg Vej 10, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark
 Phone: +45 33 27 53 25, Fax: +45 33 27 47 08

 Email: m...@crc.dk Homepage: http://www.crc.dk

 --
 fedora-list mailing list
 fedora-list@redhat.com
 To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
 Guidelines:
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: Computer host name

2009-03-05 Thread Robert Moskowitz

Steve wrote:
 Rick Stevens ri...@nerd.com wrote: 
  

James Allsopp wrote:


Hi,
I've deactivated NetworkManager as it was interfering with my wireless
networking, but since then my computer has been renamed to
ip-address-bethere.co.uk, instead of localhost.localdomain. I've
looked at /etc/hosts
/etc/sysconfig/network
and these are all set up as localhost.localdomain and the network card
facing the internet is set up statically.

Anyone have any ideas how to stop this happening?
  

If you are running a DHCP client (and it looks like you are), the DHCP
server you're using gave your machine a host name.  That's pretty
normal.



I don't think that this is true. At least not if you're running dhcp-4.0.0 as I 
am on my F9 system.
$ rpm -qa | grep dhclient
dhclient-4.0.0-22.fc9.x86_64

I had thought the same thing but I recently spent some time sifting through the code to try to find where the host name is set. What I found is that it's not set by dhclient at all. It is set in the script 
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-post by the ipcalc command which is passed the IP address that the DHCP server gives your machine. Essentially this is a DNS lookup.


If you know otherwise or if this is not always true, I'd be interested to hear 
about it.

  

My guess is that your ISP is bethere.co.uk, therefore they gave you
a hostname that reflects the IP address they gave you.  That's good,
generally, because that means they're probably maintaining a reverse DNS
entry for your IP address that points at you.

You can ignore the host name the DHCP server gives you by editing the
DHCP client config on your machine and adding

supercede host-name localhost.localdomain;

to the lease clause.  See man dhclient.conf and man dhcp-options.



You can also put

send host-name my_host_name;

in the dhclient.conf file or add

DHCP_HOSTNAME=my_host_name

to /etc/sysconfig/network


I put this entry in my /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 (or 
eth1 or whatever) that also has the line:


NM-CONTROLLED=no


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Apparent total loss of all Raid 1 data from both drives`

2009-03-05 Thread Robert Karge
Robin,

Thanks for the reply.

The rebuilt array, MD0, df shows only 1% used.

These disks are not included in LVM.

Bob Karge

On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Robin Laing robin.la...@drdc-rddc.gc.cawrote:

 Bruno Wolff III wrote:

 On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 10:26:57 -0500,
  Robert Karge rkargeconsult...@gmail.com wrote:

 Any help would be very much appreciated.  I have reloaded F10 (on the
 boot
 drive) but both drives from the original Raid 1 still appear to be
 totally
 empty.

 It is paradoxical how much the total loss of years of work and data
 teaches
 about better backup functionality.


 It is unlikely that you have really lost all of the data based on what you
 said you did. You do want to be careful about what you do now so that you
 don't make things worse while trying to fix things.
 The rescue disk suggestion is probably the way to start.
 If you are going to try to do something dangerous, you may want to
 consider
 pulling one of the disks. This has its own set of risks though and you
 would
 want to make sure if you got things back, that you back stuff up before
 trying to add the disk back into the raid array.


 I will agree with this. statement.

 With a 500GB drive, I would use this as a work disk.  I would do an install
 that doesn't look at the RAID drives.  I would actually disconnect them.

 Now you said that you rebuilt the RAID.  After to did a rebuild, did you
 have the same LVM settings?  I ask  this because I had a real nightmare with
 LVM and a RAID 1 some time ago.  I refuse to use LVM now.

 How much data is on the rebuilt array?  What does df give you?

 If worse comes to worse, you can use forensic tools to scan your drives for
 data.  I had to do this with my problem.  I put the one drive into a USB
 port and mounted it read only to scan the drive.

 The worse thing you can do is panic and rush.  It took me almost a week to
 recover some data after I forgot to back it up when I did a full system
 redesign and rebuild.

 Good luck.

 --
 Robin Laing

 --
 fedora-list mailing list
 fedora-list@redhat.com
 To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
 Guidelines:
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: xrander and big screen

2009-03-05 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 05Mar2009 10:17, David Hl??ik da...@hlacik.eu wrote:
 I have laptop with ATI radeon. I am using fglrx drivers from rpmfusion,  
 which claims to support xrandr.
 My laptop has 1440x900 , My LCD attached via DVI has 1280x1204.

 I am trying to use dual sceen with big desktop. Yes I can achieve it via  
 display config, or with xrandr switches via console.

 The main problem is , that X server treates that as a one big desktop  
 screen. When I resize window on full deskop, it is resized over 2 
 displays.
 This is not wanted scenario of couse. I want to behave as usual - resize 
 to the actuall display, not both.

The maximise function is part of your window manager, not X itself.
What window manager are you using? (If you haven't chosen one
specificly, this amounts to are you running Gnome or KDE?)

You may be able to configure your desktop as one X11 display with two
screens (technical X11 term, usually meaning a monitor but at present
meaning both monitors in your case). Then the maximise thing would work,
but you wouldn't be able to move a window from one screen to another.

Maybe the maximise facility is tunable in your desktop? Have a poke around
the configuration panels. (I don't run Gnome or KDE, so I can't help much
there).

Cheers,
-- 
Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au DoD#743
http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/

We don't like their sound, and guitar music is on the way out.
  --Decca Recording Co. rejecting the Beatles, 1962.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: [OT] Free download of Linux Fromat for 24 hours

2009-03-05 Thread Matthew Flaschen
Nigel Henry wrote:
 Up to a few hours ago, when I found out that my torrent download hadn't 
 completed, there were many folks still seeding, and was able to complete the 
 download.
 
 I've attached the .torrent file as well, as it's only 9.9KB.

Thanks!  I just downloaded it very fast, so some people are still
seeding.  I'll try to do so for a while too.

Matt Flaschen

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


  1   2   >