Fedora 11 Preview Release announcement
Memorandum of Intent to Release a Distribution of Understanding Things this email is about: - Fedora 11 Preview release - Where to get it - How to test it - Where to report problems Things this email is not about: - If there are too many sliders on a volume control - If there are not enough sliders on a volume control - Grumpiness Agenda Items: - Release Fedora 11 Preview Announcement - Tell everyone how to obtain the Preview Release - Tell everyone how to file bug reports Hidden Agenda: - Joy - Peace - Occasional fun-loving snarkiness Body: This is the Fedora 11 Preview release, we're just a short time from releasing the full shebang. Therefore we need the most testing we can possibly get on this one. On the torrent sites you'll find live images for testing: http://torrent.fedoraproject.org and http://spins.fedoraproject.org Everyone has been focused on fixing and closing their remaining bugs since the Fedora 11 Beta Release. Please use Bugzilla ( http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_file_a_bug_report ) to report any problems you find (after making sure that somebody else hasn't already reported the issues). The Preview release notes which can be found at http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f11preview/ will help you with any other details. Thanks and happy testing! -sv -- fedora-announce-list mailing list fedora-announce-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-announce-list
Re: Fedora 11 countdown banner (artwork team release)
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 1:49 AM, Ricky Zhou ri...@fedoraproject.org wrote: By the way, would it be possible to make an updated version of the 1 day banner? Right now, it says 1 days, and where it should be 1 day. The same might be true for the Italian one. Correct I'm about to send the an email to fedora-trans-list about getting more translations for the countdown. I already asked opinions for translations to the Italian team. At first glance, it could be an issue to keep the coming and arriving concepts distinct after translation. Is the text set in stone or can we tune it to ease translations? -- Gianluca Sforna http://morefedora.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/gianlucasforna ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: Fedora 11 countdown banner (artwork team release)
On 2009-04-28 08:43:26 AM, Gianluca Sforna wrote: On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 1:49 AM, Ricky Zhou ri...@fedoraproject.org wrote: By the way, would it be possible to make an updated version of the 1 day banner? Right now, it says 1 days, and where it should be 1 day. The same might be true for the Italian one. Correct I'm about to send the an email to fedora-trans-list about getting more translations for the countdown. I already asked opinions for translations to the Italian team. At first glance, it could be an issue to keep the coming and arriving concepts distinct after translation. Is the text set in stone or can we tune it to ease translations? It's up to the translator's best judgement to make it sound natural in their language. If it's necessary to change the words a bit, feel free. Thanks, Ricky pgpLPWJ2UGe52.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: Fedora 11 countdown banner (artwork team release)
Hi everybody! El mar, 28-04-2009 a las 10:16 +0200, Paolo Leoni escribió: Hi Ricky, By the way, would it be possible to make an updated version of the 1 day banner? Right now, it says 1 days, and where it should be 1 day. The same might be true for the Italian one. sorry for the mistake, today afternoon I'll re-upload corrected version for both languages. I'm about to send the an email to fedora-trans-list about getting more translations for the countdown. Any idea who I can refer translators to if they need help work the graphics work and who they should send their translated SVGs to in order to be generated? You can give my contact (hydr...@gmail.com) for those they need some assistance about banner creation. On 2009-04-28 08:43:26 AM, Gianluca Sforna wrote: I already asked opinions for translations to the Italian team. At first glance, it could be an issue to keep the coming and arriving In Spanish, I think that Coming soon could be translated to pronto (it's only soon but the real translation is llegando pronto and isn't good). Arriving in could be translated to: - Llegando en - Llega en Suggestions?? concepts distinct after translation. Is the text set in stone or can we tune it to ease translations? Hi gianluca, [I'm novastorm ;-)] Today I'll correct the banner...do you have some ideas for italian translation? Feel free to contact me if you need some help. You can also modify banner source by yourself if you want. -- Fedora-websites-list mailing list fedora-websites-l...@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list -- Paolo Leoni ~ http://pleoni.altervista.org ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: Fedora 11 countdown banner (artwork team release)
Hi Ricky, 2009/4/28 Ricky Zhou ri...@fedoraproject.org By the way, would it be possible to make an updated version of the 1 day banner? Right now, it says 1 days, and where it should be 1 day. The same might be true for the Italian one. I've uploaded the corrected version of countdown banner in both version (english and italian). You can find them here: http://pleoni.altervista.org/fedora11-countdown-banner_en.tar.gz http://pleoni.altervista.org/fedora11-countdown-banner_it.tar.gz -- Paolo Leoni ~ http://pleoni.altervista.org ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
[Bug 497984] New: [qt] Fonts are not showing, while only square in kde, gnome working fine...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [qt] Fonts are not showing, while only square in kde, gnome working fine... https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 Summary: [qt] Fonts are not showing, while only square in kde, gnome working fine... Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfa...@redhat.com ReportedBy: aa...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: besfa...@redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com, fedora-i18n-b...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: installed gnome desktop in maithili (mai_IN), later install punjabi-support (pa_IN). and tried to login gnome-desktop Punjabi, kde applications are not showing fonts, but square box Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): kdebase-4.2.2-2.fc11.i586 qt-4.5.0-14.fc11.i586 fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090318-1.fc11.i586 lohit-punjabi-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11.noarch kde-l10n-Punjabi-4.2.2-1.fc11.noarch How reproducible: Evertime Steps to Reproduce: 1. add punjabi support (yum groupinstall punjabi-support) 2. logout and login Punjabi locale 3. run kate or kwrite Actual results: actually showing square box instead of font glyph Expected results: proper font glyph should shown Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #36 from Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com 2009-04-28 09:26:25 EDT --- just tried the proposed package at comment #32. and I don't see anything better than current version of the package regardless of modifying 65-nonlatin.conf. have you ever tried to test everything at comment #24 before pushing the update? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 487061] Japanese fonts changed to less readable after update
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487061 --- Comment #3 from Akihiro Nomura sacred...@hotmail.com 2009-04-28 23:26:31 EDT --- I tried a patch proposed in #485566 and it solves my problem. I think this is the same behaviour to older VLGothic-* packages as far as I can see. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Qianqian Fang fan...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||476459 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 Qianqian Fang fan...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||492510 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Qianqian Fang fan...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(fan...@gmail.com) | --- Comment #37 from Qianqian Fang fan...@gmail.com 2009-04-28 23:40:38 EDT --- this update is basically identical to the patch posted in comment #27 (in #27, the diff was made reversed). And the behavior should match what I described in comment #29. In short, this patch by itself will not solve the problem you reported, because it depends on the solution to Bug#476459. I assume Jens is going to add a separate config file for VL Gothic to specify it as the default ja sans font. With this file in place, both Bug#476459 and this bug should be solved. I will mark this Bug#476459 as dependent to this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 485566] Fontconfig should select DejaVu font for rendering English, even in Japanese locale.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485566 Akihiro Nomura sacred...@hotmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sacred...@hotmail.com --- Comment #3 from Akihiro Nomura sacred...@hotmail.com 2009-04-28 23:44:11 EDT --- I tried this patch to vlgothic-* fonts, into /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/66-vlgothic-*.conf. This patch seems to resolve following issues (or make them to original state), which have been occurred since new fontconfig rules applied to VLGothic*. 1. In monospace, @ glyph is rendered sometimes in vlgothic or sometimes in dejavu mono and their width is different. (This bug) 2. Some English alphabet and numbers in the applets in gnome-panel looks like monospace and hard to read. I don't know why this occur and is resolved by this patch. 3. Some ambiguous width character (like □) in gnome-terminal is rendered as fill-width but treated as half-width, I mentioned this issue in Bug #487061. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 Qianqian Fang fan...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|fan...@gmail.com|ta...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Qianqian Fang fan...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(ta...@redhat.com) --- Comment #38 from Qianqian Fang fan...@gmail.com 2009-04-29 00:02:07 EDT --- Akira, I reassigned Bug#476459 since you are the maintainer of vlgothic-fonts. I want to make sure you understand my rationales for solving these two bugs: first of all, 65-nolatin sets the default font orders for cjk fonts, it does not, and perhaps should not, assume which locale is preferred, therefore, it won't solve the font variant issues for CJK. The solution is to introduce language-specific font config files. Unfortunately, Fedora does not have language-selector settings as in Ubuntu. Currently, the language specific font orders for Chinese is done by the fontconfig files associated with the default Chinese font (Zen Hei and Bitmap Song). However, Japanese does not have such config files, and completely relies on 65-nonlatin (which is not only out-dated, but also giving zh locale a lower priority). Therefore, either you want to introduce a Japanese specific font config file to set the preferred font orders for lang=ja, or you simply define VL Gothic as the default Sans for ja in the vlgothic-fonts config files, just like the file you proposed for this bug (you do need to replace zh to ja and reset the font names). I believe that a better solution would be the first one in the long run, but for now, the second solution is not bad either (in the future, this file can directly renamed to language-selector-ja_JP.conf or something like that). Let me know if this is making sense to you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Re: Statistics problem
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 07:43:01PM -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Jeff Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote: I did two counts, one for DVD and Live without uniq'ing the IP addresses doing the retrievals (because there could be multiple downloads from people behind firewalls), and one with. In both cases I think the numbers are very significantly higher than our current stats show. The raw numbers per day since F10 release are attached. All those numbers in the txt use the corrected approach? Just to be clear.. what where the stats showing before? Just the unique DVD counts? The download numbers before were using the direct download command shown on this wiki page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Statistics/Commands There was at least one major problem with that command; the Fedora 10 Live ISO filenames don't start with Fedora-10, they start with F10, meaning we weren't counting them *at all*. So I've included two counts, one for the DVD and one for the Live ISO as clicked from the get-fedora page. (Other spins, as far as I can tell, are done via torrent and we're capturing those statistics from the tracker elsewhere.) The second problem may not be a real problem -- it's that we are uniq-ing the IP addresses doing the downloading. That method has the potential to cut out legitimate, repetitive downloads from inside a firewall. I'd feel better cutting those ticks out if they were separated by a very short timeframe. Then we could be reasonably certain they were caused by repeated clicks, rather than actual separate downloads. In the interest of a conservative approach, I'm willing to stick with uniq-ing the stats, but I produced both sets of numbers anyway. -- Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug pgppqNTkWiFE9.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Statistics problem
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote: uniq-ing the IP addresses doing the downloading. That method has the potential to cut out legitimate, repetitive downloads from inside a firewall. I'd feel better cutting those ticks out if they were I'm not sure if you can see this in our logs or not (you might have to have the individual mirrors logs :( ), but if the response code is a 206, that means it was a RANGE request - to download part of a file. It's not at all uncommon for a download manager to open 20-30 connections to download the same file for the same user., So I'd opt for the conservative approach of uniques as well. ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: sphinx as search solution?
Hey Ian, I had a crack at it on the pt10 machine... but its a little bit on the heavier side uses a lot of resources... I have been running some tests with HT:dig and lucene... Ht dig hung up the test machine while indexing... :) Jose On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org wrote: Here's a search engine solution[1] that doesn't run on Java and has a MediaWiki plugin[2]. Please take a look at let me know what you think with regards to using it for Fedora Infra's purposes. [1] http://www.sphinxsearch.com/ [2] https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/mediawiki/wiki/Extension:SphinxSearch -- Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org GnuPG fingerprint: E51E 0517 7A92 70A2 4226 B050 87ED 7C97 EFA8 4A36 ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list -- Jose M Manimala http://www.jmmblog.in.eu.org Ph: +919790824111 GPGkeyID: F5DD9656 ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Bit flip
We need to do the bit flip sooner. The announcement is out, I've sent over 600 requests and not a single one has come back a success. I know work is being done to change this whole mechanism now, but we still should be flipping the bit sooner. -Mike ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Bit flip
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Mike McGrath wrote: We need to do the bit flip sooner. The announcement is out, I've sent over 600 requests and not a single one has come back a success. I know work is being done to change this whole mechanism now, but we still should be flipping the bit sooner. I flipped the bits at: 8:30am EDT. That was a bit earlier than before. -sv ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Bit flip
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Seth Vidal wrote: On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Mike McGrath wrote: We need to do the bit flip sooner. The announcement is out, I've sent over 600 requests and not a single one has come back a success. I know work is being done to change this whole mechanism now, but we still should be flipping the bit sooner. I flipped the bits at: 8:30am EDT. That was a bit earlier than before. I'm thinking more like hours. From the last release I monitored: http://mmcgrath.fedorapeople.org/alphaMirrorRediness.html We didn't hit 80% success rate until 3 and a half hours after the launch. I think mdomsch made some good changes since this graph that will make the outcome better, but I still think that initial launch isn't right. Perhaps we should wait to send the announcement out until a certain % of mirrors are ready? We currently don't check that prior to announce. -Mike ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Bit flip
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Mike McGrath wrote: I'm thinking more like hours. From the last release I monitored: http://mmcgrath.fedorapeople.org/alphaMirrorRediness.html We didn't hit 80% success rate until 3 and a half hours after the launch. I think mdomsch made some good changes since this graph that will make the outcome better, but I still think that initial launch isn't right. Perhaps we should wait to send the announcement out until a certain % of mirrors are ready? We currently don't check that prior to announce. I went by Jesse's wording of make sure at least a few mirrors are synced and you said on irc that 3 mirrors in the US were synced. That's why I sent out the announcement then. That may be where the mixup was. -sv ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Bit flip
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Seth Vidal wrote: On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Mike McGrath wrote: I'm thinking more like hours. From the last release I monitored: http://mmcgrath.fedorapeople.org/alphaMirrorRediness.html We didn't hit 80% success rate until 3 and a half hours after the launch. I think mdomsch made some good changes since this graph that will make the outcome better, but I still think that initial launch isn't right. Perhaps we should wait to send the announcement out until a certain % of mirrors are ready? We currently don't check that prior to announce. I went by Jesse's wording of make sure at least a few mirrors are synced and you said on irc that 3 mirrors in the US were synced. That's why I sent out the announcement then. That may be where the mixup was. Synced but if you clicked on those mirrors they threw a forbidden message. -Mike ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Bit flip
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:18:47AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Seth Vidal wrote: On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Mike McGrath wrote: I'm thinking more like hours. From the last release I monitored: http://mmcgrath.fedorapeople.org/alphaMirrorRediness.html We didn't hit 80% success rate until 3 and a half hours after the launch. I think mdomsch made some good changes since this graph that will make the outcome better, but I still think that initial launch isn't right. Perhaps we should wait to send the announcement out until a certain % of mirrors are ready? We currently don't check that prior to announce. I went by Jesse's wording of make sure at least a few mirrors are synced and you said on irc that 3 mirrors in the US were synced. That's why I sent out the announcement then. That may be where the mixup was. Synced but if you clicked on those mirrors they threw a forbidden message. Backwards math: Time to generate and publish updated mirrorlist: 20 minutes Time to crawl all mirrors: ~2 hours Time for most mirrors to rsync and catch the bitflip: 6 hours Time to sync bitflip to all three netapps: 30 minutes (maybe ). Time to do bitflip: 1 minute So Mike is correct, that if we bitflip 2.5+ hours ahead of 1400 UTC, that by 1400 UTC we'll know which mirrors have actually picked up the bitflip and are live. If we bitflip a lot earlier, say 6.5 hours ahead, we can have nearly all the mirrors with the right permissions, and showing right on the mirrorlist. MM is also bad in that it doesn't know the directory permissions on every directory that a report_mirror-using mirror has. So we're showing mirrors in the publiclist, and returning them to clients on with mirrorlist/d.fp.o when we don't know that their permissions are correct. Adding that knowledge to report_mirror and MM would prevent us from returning pre-bitflip mirrors to clients. That's a good bit of work I haven't scoped. -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com www.dell.com/linux ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Preview release is out!
Get to installing. Get to testing. Get to filling out this matrix: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Fedora_11_Preview_Install_Test_Results -Mike ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Bit flip
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:34:51AM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: Backwards math: Time to generate and publish updated mirrorlist: 20 minutes Time to crawl all mirrors: ~2 hours Time for most mirrors to rsync and catch the bitflip: 6 hours Insert step: Time for update-master-directory-list to catch the bitflip: 30 minutes Time to sync bitflip to all three netapps: 30 minutes (maybe ). Time to do bitflip: 1 minute Shortest time through the path is: 1+30+30+120+20, or nearly 3.5 hours, which lines up well with Mike's observation that 3.5 hours was needed before we stopped sending people to closed mirrors. So, I'd like to propose we back up the bitflip by at least 4 hours from release time, perhaps as much as 6. I'd also like to move the update-mirrorlist cronjob back to start at :40 past the hour, so content is in place by :00. -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com www.dell.com/linux ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: sphinx as search solution?
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 7:36 AM, jose manimala josemanim...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Ian, I had a crack at it on the pt10 machine... but its a little bit on the heavier side uses a lot of resources... I have been running some tests with HT:dig and lucene... Ht dig hung up the test machine while indexing... :) Jose What tools have we investigated in the past? -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. The Merchant of Venice ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Half hour downtime
I'd like to schedule a half hour of downtime for our netapp in PHX. This should only impact some nfs related stuff (primary mirror and things like images on the wiki). I'd like to do this before the final freeze, RH's storage team will actually be performing the work, I just want to find a time that will work for everyone. Does sometime next week work? -Mike ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
changes post-freeze
A few things I'd like to change starting tomorrow (post-freeze). * change the MM update-master-directory-list cronjob to start at 0 and 30 past the hour, from its current schedule of trying to start every 15 minutes. It is taking about 20 minutes on average to run, so really is only running twice an hour anyhow. * bump back the MM update-mirrorlist cronjob to start at :40 past the hour. It takes about 20 minutes to complete, and I would like the new content to land at the top of the hour. * in modules/rsync/files/rsyncd.conf.secondary1, exclude alt/stage. Mirrors shouldn't be able to sync this content. * in MM prod.cfg, exclude pub/alt/stage. Mirrors shouldn't have this content, and it's extra directory walks we don't need. * increase the number of crawlers, from 45 to 75. A full run is taking about 3 hours now, I'd like to bring this down to under 2. This only affects bapp1, whose load average is still under 1 and has plenty of free RAM and CPU it seems. Objections or comments? Thanks, Matt -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com www.dell.com/linux ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Half hour downtime
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: I'd like to schedule a half hour of downtime for our netapp in PHX. This should only impact some nfs related stuff (primary mirror and things like images on the wiki). I'd like to do this before the final freeze, RH's storage team will actually be performing the work, I just want to find a time that will work for everyone. Does sometime next week work? Are there any more RC's etc coming out? I would expect that 1 week would allow for high seeding of mirrors so it should impact too much. Is the half-hour max or estimated down time? What kind of Netapp do they use these days? (European or African)? -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. The Merchant of Venice ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: changes post-freeze
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com wrote: A few things I'd like to change starting tomorrow (post-freeze). * change the MM update-master-directory-list cronjob to start at 0 and 30 past the hour, from its current schedule of trying to start every 15 minutes. It is taking about 20 minutes on average to run, so really is only running twice an hour anyhow. * bump back the MM update-mirrorlist cronjob to start at :40 past the hour. It takes about 20 minutes to complete, and I would like the new content to land at the top of the hour. Is the 20 minutes a maximum or average? I was just wondering if somewhere between 35 and 40 would make sure it doesn't conflict with a job at the top of the hour? * in modules/rsync/files/rsyncd.conf.secondary1, exclude alt/stage. Mirrors shouldn't be able to sync this content. * in MM prod.cfg, exclude pub/alt/stage. Mirrors shouldn't have this content, and it's extra directory walks we don't need. * increase the number of crawlers, from 45 to 75. A full run is taking about 3 hours now, I'd like to bring this down to under 2. This only affects bapp1, whose load average is still under 1 and has plenty of free RAM and CPU it seems. sorry for clueless question number 2. What is the limiting factors for the crawlers? Network bandwidth/latency or CPU? Objections or comments? Thanks, Matt -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com www.dell.com/linux ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. The Merchant of Venice ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: changes post-freeze
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:51:18PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com wrote: A few things I'd like to change starting tomorrow (post-freeze). * change the MM update-master-directory-list cronjob to start at 0 and ?30 past the hour, from its current schedule of trying to start every ?15 minutes. ?It is taking about 20 minutes on average to run, so ?really is only running twice an hour anyhow. * bump back the MM update-mirrorlist cronjob to start at :40 past the ?hour. ?It takes about 20 minutes to complete, and I would like the ?new content to land at the top of the hour. Is the 20 minutes a maximum or average? I was just wondering if somewhere between 35 and 40 would make sure it doesn't conflict with a job at the top of the hour? pretty much maximum, though to be fair, I am not recording the start and stop times for these events in their respective logfiles to know for sure. * increase the number of crawlers, from 45 to 75. ?A full run is ?taking about 3 hours now, I'd like to bring this down to under 2. ?This only affects bapp1, whose load average is still under 1 and has ?plenty of free RAM and CPU it seems. sorry for clueless question number 2. What is the limiting factors for the crawlers? Network bandwidth/latency or CPU? More latency than bandwidth. The crawlers issue HTTP HEAD requests for a lot of files on each mirror to be sure they match. The latency in response to these requests (single-threaded to each mirror, but hitting 45 (or soon more) mirrors in parallel) is what limits the speed of an individual crawler. Then the time for the whole run is simply the time it takes to complete each of the crawlers. Very little CPU is used, except at the end of each crawler, when it updates the database with its findings. Then it jumps up in CPU for a few seconds. -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com www.dell.com/linux ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: sphinx as search solution?
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 7:36 AM, jose manimala josemanim...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Ian, I had a crack at it on the pt10 machine... but its a little bit on the heavier side uses a lot of resources... I have been running some tests with HT:dig and lucene... Ht dig hung up the test machine while indexing... :) Jose What tools have we investigated in the past? I've personally used htdig in the past, we've had some proof of concepts setup but no real report on performance, IO/memory usage, cpu, etc. Seems like we start over a lot on this one. daMaestro has one working but I'm not sure what all he thinks of it. -Mike___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Half hour downtime
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 01:39:47PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: I'd like to schedule a half hour of downtime for our netapp in PHX. This should only impact some nfs related stuff (primary mirror and things like images on the wiki). I'd like to do this before the final freeze, RH's storage team will actually be performing the work, I just want to find a time that will work for everyone. Does sometime next week work? fine from mirrors perspective. -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com www.dell.com/linux ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Half hour downtime
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: I'd like to schedule a half hour of downtime for our netapp in PHX. This should only impact some nfs related stuff (primary mirror and things like images on the wiki). I'd like to do this before the final freeze, RH's storage team will actually be performing the work, I just want to find a time that will work for everyone. Does sometime next week work? Are there any more RC's etc coming out? I would expect that 1 week would allow for high seeding of mirrors so it should impact too much. I'm hoping Jesse can comment on this one, AFAIK it wouldn't fall in our normal freeze window though which will end tomorrow and start again on May 12th. Is the half-hour max or estimated down time? 15 minutes was the estimate from the storage team. My understanding is this is a firmware upgrade so our new storage trays will work. The trays themselves can be installed live. What kind of Netapp do they use these days? (European or African)? I can never remember :-/ I'll ask. -Mike___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Bit flip
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:53:23AM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote: On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Mike McGrath wrote: I'm thinking more like hours. From the last release I monitored: http://mmcgrath.fedorapeople.org/alphaMirrorRediness.html We didn't hit 80% success rate until 3 and a half hours after the launch. I think mdomsch made some good changes since this graph that will make the outcome better, but I still think that initial launch isn't right. Perhaps we should wait to send the announcement out until a certain % of mirrors are ready? We currently don't check that prior to announce. I went by Jesse's wording of make sure at least a few mirrors are synced and you said on irc that 3 mirrors in the US were synced. That's why I sent out the announcement then. That may be where the mixup was. It didn't help that I had to stick my big fat nose in and help by approving the message in the moderation queue. Sorry I contributed to the angst. :-( -- Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug pgp0fTxUWHX9u.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Any C coders want to help me with something?
Any C coders want to help me with a pam module? -Mike ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Any C coders want to help me with something?
On 2009-04-28 04:57:33 PM, Mike McGrath wrote: Any C coders want to help me with a pam module? I've been doing some C in school, so if there's no big rush, I wouldn't mind getting some practice :-) Thanks, Ricky pgpWcwE5v5t7S.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Any C coders want to help me with something?
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: Any C coders want to help me with a pam module? I am not a great C coder but I have done some pam stuff. what is the issue? -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. The Merchant of Venice ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Any C coders want to help me with something?
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: Any C coders want to help me with a pam module? I am not a great C coder but I have done some pam stuff. what is the issue? I'd like someone to write a pam module to auth against fas. I'm not sure it's the way to go but I'd like to have something up and running to test with to see how it behaves, how it deals with some failure scenarios, etc. -Mike ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: 2.6.29.1-102.fc11 --with vanilla broken
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:18:07 -0400
Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu wrote:
ERROR: Patch linux-2.6-build-nonintconfig.patch not listed as a
source patch in specfile
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.8pegaB (%prep)
this is due to the following code in ApplyPatch():
if ! egrep ^Patch[0-9]+: $patch\$ %{_specdir}/%{name}.spec ; then
if [ ${patch:0:10} != patch-2.6. ] ; then
echo ERROR: Patch $patch not listed as a source patch in specfile
exit 1
fi
fi 2/dev/null
It's trying to grep in {_specdir}/kernel-vanilla.spec because of the ugly
name-munging
that's used to build the vanilla kernel.
Fixed in 2.6.29.1-114:
if ! egrep ^Patch[0-9]+: $patch\$
%{_specdir}/${RPM_PACKAGE_NAME%{?variant}}.spec ; then
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: 2.6.29.1-102.fc11 --with vanilla broken
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:17:04 -0400 Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu wrote: Great. I ended up having lots of other issues with vanilla build. At some point during the build, the make oldconfig becomes interactive during the %install phase. I answer all the questions with default values (hitting enter on each one) and then the build fails. I also see some interesting thigs with ia64. Why is it messing with ia64 configs? Excerpts: Building for target noarch ... You should always specify an arch. I normally use: rpmbuild -bb --target x86_64 --with baseonly --without debuginfo --with firmware kernel.spec (--with firmware has some problems when building 32-bit kernels on x86_64 though.) ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: 2.6.29.1-102.fc11 --with vanilla broken
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 01:01:17PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:17:04 -0400 Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu wrote: Great. I ended up having lots of other issues with vanilla build. At some point during the build, the make oldconfig becomes interactive during the %install phase. I answer all the questions with default values (hitting enter on each one) and then the build fails. I also see some interesting thigs with ia64. Why is it messing with ia64 configs? Excerpts: Building for target noarch ... You should always specify an arch. I normally use: rpmbuild -bb --target x86_64 --with baseonly --without debuginfo --with firmware kernel.spec (--with firmware has some problems when building 32-bit kernels on x86_64 though.) Sorry, I should have specified the command I had used. It was similar to this: rpmbuild -ba --target=i386,i686,noarch --with vanilla --without debuginfo --without debug --with firmware kernel.spec I was building on an F10 i386 host. ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: 2.6.29.1-102.fc11 --with vanilla broken
Great. I ended up having lots of other issues with vanilla build. At some point during the build, the make oldconfig becomes interactive during the %install phase. %install?? Weird. That should not be happening. Maybe a V=1 on the make command would make kbuild explain why it decided to do that. I also see some interesting thigs with ia64. Why is it messing with ia64 configs? That stuff is normal. Ignore it if it doesn't break the build. ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: 2.6.29.1-102.fc11 --with vanilla broken
You should always specify an arch. make prep uses noarch and generally works fine. You can just ignore the strange assembler messages in the 'make configs' phase and the .config files come out fine, in my experience. ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: 2.6.29.1-102.fc11 --with vanilla broken
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:27:38AM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: You should always specify an arch. make prep uses noarch and generally works fine. You can just ignore the strange assembler messages in the 'make configs' phase and the .config files come out fine, in my experience. The strange messages are just annoying Makefile detritus because of running ARCH=ia64, they're nothing to be concerned with, and not relevant to anything but actually building the kernel on ia64. (See also arch/ia64/Makefile $GAS_STATUS and $KBUILD_CPPFLAGS) cheers, Kyle ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: 2.6.29.1-102.fc11 --with vanilla broken
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 01:51:08PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:14:08 -0400 Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu wrote: Sorry, I should have specified the command I had used. It was similar to this: rpmbuild -ba --target=i386,i686,noarch --with vanilla --without debuginfo --without debug --with firmware kernel.spec I was building on an F10 i386 host. I don't think the target can be a list. And if you say '--with firmware' you don't need to build the noarch target unless you want docs (if you do want the whole noarch build then you don't need '--with firmware'.) The target has been able to be list for as long as I can remember building Fedora kernels. If it can't be a list now, then that is news to me. ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: ia64 no longer should set CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED=y
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 16:40 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 04:33:22PM -0400, Doug Chapman wrote: Back in the F9 timeframe we had recommended that CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED=y be set for the ia64 config. It appears that recent anaconda changes no longer work at all with that set. Can we get this removed? It was set only for ia64 so it will have no affect on other arches. Done. Dave I see this change has been made to the fc12 tree but not fc11. Can we get this change in the current F-11 branch also? thanks, - Doug ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
[Fedora-legal-list] Trademark - FEDORA
I am a trademark attorney working in Brazil. I have come across a company which has applied to register the trademark FEDORA in Brazil for services in Class 35. I want to know if this third party has permission to do so. Who do I contact regarding this? Kris Williamson Advocacia Pietro Ariboni Ariboni, Fabbri, Schmidt Advogados Associados Rua Guararapes, 1909 -10º andar Brooklin Novo São Paulo - SP Tel: (11) 5502-1222 Fax (11) 5505-3306 E-mail: k...@aribonifabbri.com.br aribonifab...@ariboni.com.br ___ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
[Fwd: [Fedora-legal-list] Trademark - FEDORA]
I'll handle. Pam Original Message Subject:[Fedora-legal-list] Trademark - FEDORA Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:00:53 -0300 From: Kris Williamson (KRW) k...@aribonifabbri.com.br To: fedora-legal-list@redhat.com I am a trademark attorney working in Brazil. I have come across a company which has applied to register the trademark FEDORA in Brazil for services in Class 35. I want to know if this third party has permission to do so. Who do I contact regarding this? Kris Williamson Advocacia Pietro Ariboni Ariboni, Fabbri, Schmidt Advogados Associados Rua Guararapes, 1909 -10º andar Brooklin Novo São Paulo - SP Tel: (11) 5502-1222 Fax (11) 5505-3306 E-mail: k...@aribonifabbri.com.br mailto:k...@aribonifabbri.com.br aribonifab...@ariboni.com.br mailto:aribonifab...@ariboni.com.br ___ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list ___ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
Re: Apache Virtual Server
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 10:59 -0700, Dennis Kaptain wrote: I created: /var/www/html/QuickStart/ /var/www/html/QuickStart/application/ /var/www/html/QuickStart/application/controllers/ /var/www/html/QuickStart/application/views/ /var/www/html/QuickStart/application/views/scripts/ /var/www/html/QuickStart/library/ /var/www/html/QuickStart/public/ The last directory 'public' wants to be the DocumentRoot I want to set up a virtual server whose DocumentRoot is /var/www/html/QuickStart/public Just so that you're aware: If anyone can connect to your web server by IP or domain name, then they can access all those other directories just by using the base domain name, unless you take other measure about it. i.e. http://confianza/application/controllers/ I mention this in case it's important. Perhaps it doesn't matter if someone can access everything on the server, I don't know what the content is. -- [...@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.21-78.2.41.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Apache Virtual Server
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 20:42 +0200, Uwe Kiewel wrote: I'm not sure how apache recognizes which virtual server the client requests. Maybe you need a real dns setup. The hostname request is sent in the connection from the browser, the webserver uses the first virtual host that matches the name. So the order that you specify hosts in is important if there's any double matches. The default will be used if none of the virtual hosts match. I have virtual hosts configured as per your sample, plus a default one like this: VirtualHost _default_:80 DocumentRoot/var/www/html /VirtualHost That just shows the usual Fedora + Apache, the webserver is working, test page. I found it easier to specify *all* websites as virtual hosts, with just a blank dummy site in the default host (/var/www/html/). And to avoid someone being able to cross between sites inappropriately, none of them are sub-directories inside /var/www/html/. They all have separate roots. e.g. Default: /var/www/html/ example: /var/www/example test: /var/www/test If you don't do that, and you don't want people to be able to access one site through another, you need complex access limitation rules. You need to have name and numerical IP address resolution agreeing with each other on the server and any clients that connect. That can be done with their hosts files, or using a DNS server. For anything more than about two or three computers, it's easier to use one central DNS server. Never again will you have to mess with any hosts file for any other network or server configurations. And, for some things, the hosts file is inadequate. -- [...@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.21-78.2.41.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Video Card for SuperMicro SuperWorkstation 5046A-XB
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:47:56 -0500 Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 19:34:58 -0500, Steven P. Ulrick lists-fed...@afolkey2.net wrote: What I am now after is a video card. I don't need anything fancy. I think I would be satisfied with whatever functionality that I can get just using the apporpriate open source driver. So, I don't mind using, let's say an NVidia card. I further don't mind completely and totally AVOIDING any issues involved with depending on a proprietary company keeping their proprietary binary blob in sync with the latest Kernel updates. I just want a card that will Just Work the above described system, with a minimum of headaches. With which version of Fedora? Things are changing a lot in Fedora 11, so which cards work has been changing throughout rawhide. Going with Fedora 11 was/is my intention. Right now my ATI rv530 based card is working pretty well for normal stuff. I don't do much 3d with it, but did do a short test using tremulous today and it seemed to work OK. Steven P. Ulrick -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: FC10 and NDISwrapper
Thanks Jerry, Axel, I'm going to look into the native drivers rather than ndiswrappers. Even though I finally got the ndiswrapper rpm's to install I prefer this idea. The laptop is a Dell Vostro 1510, and lspci gives: 06:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4312 802.11b/g (rev 01) Gary On Monday 27 April 2009 21:48:57 Jerry Feldman wrote: Rather than screw with NDISWrapper, are you using a BroadCom NIC? There is a native Broadcom driver in F10, but you need to load the firmware. There is a utility called b43-fwcutter you would use to do this from the Windows driver. In any case, it might be better for you to describe your wireless chip and Dell model. Note that NDISWrapper is bith a driver (ndiswrapper.ko) as well as a command. But, in the case of Broadcom, it will conflict with the native driver. On 04/27/2009 10:18 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote: Hi folks. I'm trying to get WIFI working on my new DELL and I've been told to try ndiswrappers. -- Gary Stainburn This email does not contain private or confidential material as it may be snooped on by interested government parties for unknown and undisclosed purposes - Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, 2000 -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Question about upgrading Fedora (from fc6 to FC10)
Hello, I am quite new to Fedora. One of our server is installed with fc6 and I see there are no updates anymore, which leads me to many questions : 1. Is there a place to find the packages to be able to have our server installed with the latest FC6 updates ? 2. Can I upgrade live or should I use the CDROM ? What is the best ? I read that The recommended installation method is with a boot media with the Anaconda installer as detailed in the Installation Guide http://docs.fedoraproject.org/install-guide/. PreUpgrade http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PreUpgrade is a slightly different upgrade method where the all packages are downloaded before the system is rebooted into the Anaconda installer. If that's true, can I thrust it at100% to make the server work, or are there some changes in config that could not be solved ? What do you suggest ? Simply backup /etc ? 3. Whatever solution I choose, is it better to upgrade fc6 - FC10 or 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 ? Thanks a lot in advance for your help, Denis P.S. I already read this website : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/YumUpgradeFaq Denis Bucher -- Denis Bucher Horus Digital Solutions sàrl Each problem has a solution ___ Tél. +41-22-8000625 Fax: +41-22-8000622 www.hsolutions.ch -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: insmod and WIFI - was Re: FC10 and NDISwrapper
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 10:41 +0100, Gary Stainburn wrote: 1) How do I make the two insmod's survive over a reboot. In general, that sort of thing can be accomplished by putting a command line into the /etc/rc.local file. -- [...@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.21-78.2.41.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Question about upgrading Fedora (from fc6 to FC10)
Denis BUCHER wrote: 3. Whatever solution I choose, is it better to upgrade fc6 - FC10 or 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 ? FC6 has been unsupported for a long time now and has not had updates available, nor will there be any more updates since F8 was released! If I had that system my inclination would not be to do an upgrade but to do a clean install of F10. Before doing so I would backup the user areas and any system config files to a safe drive. Then after installing F10 I would yum update the system, and then copy back user areas and add the user lines manually into /etc/passwd, /etc/shadow /etc/group and /etc/gshadow - and then manually go through the system config files and get the various server configs working one at a time. Presumably you have /home or /opt on a separate drive or partition and they need not be touched at all during the install. Also remember that F10 has selinux enabled by default - so it is possible you may need to tweak a few settings - also some things that you may have had set up in FC6 may not work with selinux enabled - you will have the option of setting selinux disabled after the install is complete but it is a good idea to understand enough about it that you can have the system running with selinux for additional protection. Good luck. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Question-about-upgrading-Fedora-%28from-fc6-to-FC10%29-tp23274098p23274951.html Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Fedora 10 openssl + neon + subversion + https + user cert authentication
Good day, I've put this same question a while back and didn't get any answer. Isn't anyone using snv with ssl client auth? I don't know exactly where my problem is, but I'll explain in detail to see if anyone has the same and a solution. I'm trying to access to a subversion repo via https with client authentication with certificates. The solution is implemented in a centos 5.2. If in the machine where the solution is implemented I can do a svn co https://site/repo The answer a question where the certificate resides for the access and I can get a successful checkout. If I do the same in a fedora 10 I get the following error after I tell where the certificate is: svn: OPTIONS of 'https://site/repo': SSL negotiation failed: SSL alert received: Decrypt error (https://site) For what I've seen this could be a bug recently introduced in openssl/neon. Is this right? Both systems are completely up to date. Thanks in advance. JB -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: strange ImageMagick dependencies
brian wrote: Bottom line: what's the bare minimum I can get away with here? Disk space isn't the issue--I just want to avoid a lot of this if possible. If you want a fully-functional ImageMagick, all of those items are truly needed. Some of them are X-related deps, due to ImageMagick's 'display' app. -- rex -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
insmod and WIFI - was Re: FC10 and NDISwrapper
Hi folks, Thanks to help on here I'm almost there with my WIFI connection. The session log below shows that the new broadcom WIFI drivers work (in theory). I now have two questions. 1) How do I make the two insmod's survive over a reboot. 2) How do I get to use the new WIFI interface? Gary [r...@gary ~]# ifconfig eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:21:70:F2:38:9A inet addr:10.1.1.171 Bcast:10.1.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0 inet6 addr: fe80::221:70ff:fef2:389a/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:259 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:36 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:20959 (20.4 KiB) TX bytes:6136 (5.9 KiB) Interrupt:16 Base address:0x4000 loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:22 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:22 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:1788 (1.7 KiB) TX bytes:1788 (1.7 KiB) [r...@gary ~]# cd ~gary [r...@gary gary]# insmod ndiswrapper/hybrid_wl/wl.ko insmod: error inserting 'ndiswrapper/hybrid_wl/wl.ko': -1 Unknown symbol in module [r...@gary gary]# modprobe ieee80211_crypt_tkip [r...@gary gary]# insmod ndiswrapper/hybrid_wl/wl.ko [r...@gary gary]# ifconfig eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:21:70:F2:38:9A inet addr:10.1.1.171 Bcast:10.1.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0 inet6 addr: fe80::221:70ff:fef2:389a/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:671 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:41 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:49646 (48.4 KiB) TX bytes:6556 (6.4 KiB) Interrupt:16 Base address:0x4000 eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:22:5F:82:03:6C inet6 addr: fe80::222:5fff:fe82:36c/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) Interrupt:19 loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:34 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:34 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:2388 (2.3 KiB) TX bytes:2388 (2.3 KiB) [r...@gary gary]# -- Gary Stainburn This email does not contain private or confidential material as it may be snooped on by interested government parties for unknown and undisclosed purposes - Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, 2000 -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: FC10 and NDISwrapper
On 04/28/2009 05:08 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote: Thanks Jerry, Axel, I'm going to look into the native drivers rather than ndiswrappers. Even though I finally got the ndiswrapper rpm's to install I prefer this idea. The laptop is a Dell Vostro 1510, and lspci gives: 06:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4312 802.11b/g (rev 01) That's what I thought. Take a look at what dmesg tells you. It will probably recognize the chip and then complain about the firmware. In this case, you would need b43-fwcutter to extract the firmware from the Windows .sys file, and (with the appropriate options) drop it into /lib/modules. I've done this on my laptop when it was running SuSE and now runs Ubuntu. -- Jerry Feldman g...@blu.org Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id: 537C5846 PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: annoying domain.local issue
First I would like to thank you for really nice ane helpfull email. On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au wrote: On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 17:20 +0200, Valent Turkovic wrote: Do you have any issues when domain ends with dot local (.local) ? How can I troubleshoot this more and fix it? Both Fedora and Windows use the same DNS and same default gateway. And does that DNS server have an answer for queries to that domain name? If it does, does it have the right answer? ping doesn't work from Fedora; # ping web.iskon.local ping: unknown host web.iskon.local # ping samba.iskon.local ping: unknown host web.iskon.local How domains are resolved is configured in a few places. The /etc/nsswitch.conf has a hosts section which lists the places to look up through, in sequence. Mine has the following in it: #hosts: db files nisplus nis dns hosts: files dns (files being the /etc/hosts file, dns being a DHS server.) Putting a custom entry into your hosts file, for your .local addresses, ain't gonna help you if it consults a DNS server, first, which says something different about .local. That's used for networking, in general. SMB work independently, it can also use an lmhosts file (inside the /etc/samba/ directory), or as a WINS server (an option inside the smb.conf file), as well as DNS. I'd suggest posting your hosts, nsswitch.conf, resolv.conf and smb.conf files for others to see what you're doing, rather than guess. Also the outputs from running nslookup and dig with your problem domain name. Here is mine nsswitch.conf : http://fpaste.org/paste/10360 hosts : http://fpaste.org/paste/10361 resolv.conf : http://fpaste.org/paste/10362 i.e. dig samba.domain.local nslookup samba.domain.local $ dig web.domain.local ; DiG 9.5.1-P2-RedHat-9.5.1-2.P2.fc10 web.domain.local ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 53744 ;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;web.domain.local. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: web.domain.local. 1200IN A 10.0.0.18 ;; Query time: 5 msec ;; SERVER: 10.0.0.6#53(10.0.0.6) ;; WHEN: Tue Apr 28 14:18:17 2009 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 49 $ nslookup web.domain.local Server: 10.0.0.6 Address:10.0.0.6#53 Name: web.domain.local Address: 10.0.0.18 $ host 10.0.0.18 28.0.0.10.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer web.domain.local. But I can't ping web.domain.local :( And typing http://web.domain.local in Firefox doesn't open the web page, but typing IP it does. If I type 10.0.0.8 in Firefox I get the home page. As I mentioned I also have Winwdows in VirtualBox VM and there everything works ok - ping works and also Firefox opens web.domain.local without problems. If you're bodging up faux domain names, you might have to fiddle quite a few things to get it to work. I found it easier to run my own domain name server, with records for local domain names, and have all my local computers use my domain name server. When I enter in my hosts file this line: 10.0.0.18web.domain.local then I can ping the web server from my Fedora laptop... any ideas? -- http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/ linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org. ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: annoying domain.local issue
And typing http://web.domain.local in Firefox doesn't open the web page, but typing IP it does. If I type 10.0.0.8 in Firefox I get the home page. Typo: correct IP is 10.0.0.18 -- http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/ linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org. ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: annoying domain.local issue
The same issue is also with Ubuntu 9.04 I can't ping web.domain.local but I get IP via nslookup and I can ping the IP address. Something is fishy, and I guess I didn't configure it properly but I can't seam to see what I'm doing wrong. I looked at Windows ipconfig /all output and this is what I see: C:\Documents and Settings\Valentipconfig /all Windows IP Configuration Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : iskon-84830d297 Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : iskon.local Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Unknown IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : iskon.local Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection: Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : Description . . . . . . . . . . . : AMD PCNET Family Ethernet Adapt CI) Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 08-00-27-3F-A9-74 Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.0.2.15 Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 10.0.2.2 DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.0.2.2 DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.0.0.16 10.0.0.17 Lease Obtained. . . . . . . . . . : 28. travanj 2009 8:36:10 Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . . : 29. travanj 2009 8:36:10 This part seams suspicious: Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : iskon.local Do I need to configure dns suffix on Fedora also, why and how? Valent. -- http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/ linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org. ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: annoying domain.local issue
i rushed and copy/pasted wrong info, sorry :( The correct info is: C:\Documents and Settings\Valentipconfig /all Windows IP Configuration Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : domain-84830d297 Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : domain.local Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Unknown IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : domain.local Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection: Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : Description . . . . . . . . . . . : AMD PCNET Family Ethernet Adapt Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 08-00-27-3F-A9-74 Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.0.2.15 Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 10.0.2.2 DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.0.2.2 DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.0.0.6 10.0.0.7 Lease Obtained. . . . . . . . . . : 28. travanj 2009 8:36:10 Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . . : 29. travanj 2009 8:36:10 This part seams suspicious: Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : domain.local Do I need to configure dns suffix on Fedora also, why and how? -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: annoying domain.local issue
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Valent Turkovic valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote: First I would like to thank you for really nice ane helpfull email. On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au wrote: On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 17:20 +0200, Valent Turkovic wrote: Do you have any issues when domain ends with dot local (.local) ? How can I troubleshoot this more and fix it? Both Fedora and Windows use the same DNS and same default gateway. And does that DNS server have an answer for queries to that domain name? If it does, does it have the right answer? ping doesn't work from Fedora; # ping web.iskon.local ping: unknown host web.iskon.local # ping samba.iskon.local ping: unknown host web.iskon.local How domains are resolved is configured in a few places. The /etc/nsswitch.conf has a hosts section which lists the places to look up through, in sequence. Mine has the following in it: #hosts: db files nisplus nis dns hosts: files dns (files being the /etc/hosts file, dns being a DHS server.) Putting a custom entry into your hosts file, for your .local addresses, ain't gonna help you if it consults a DNS server, first, which says something different about .local. That's used for networking, in general. SMB work independently, it can also use an lmhosts file (inside the /etc/samba/ directory), or as a WINS server (an option inside the smb.conf file), as well as DNS. I'd suggest posting your hosts, nsswitch.conf, resolv.conf and smb.conf files for others to see what you're doing, rather than guess. Also the outputs from running nslookup and dig with your problem domain name. Here is mine nsswitch.conf : http://fpaste.org/paste/10360 hosts : http://fpaste.org/paste/10361 resolv.conf : http://fpaste.org/paste/10362 i.e. dig samba.domain.local nslookup samba.domain.local $ dig web.domain.local ; DiG 9.5.1-P2-RedHat-9.5.1-2.P2.fc10 web.domain.local ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 53744 ;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;web.domain.local. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: web.domain.local. 1200 IN A 10.0.0.18 ;; Query time: 5 msec ;; SERVER: 10.0.0.6#53(10.0.0.6) ;; WHEN: Tue Apr 28 14:18:17 2009 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 49 $ nslookup web.domain.local Server: 10.0.0.6 Address: 10.0.0.6#53 Name: web.domain.local Address: 10.0.0.18 $ host 10.0.0.18 28.0.0.10.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer web.domain.local. if you are not using the dns on your fedora you would need to configure fedora to use another dns server which can be done in /etc/resolv.conf the host file is to identify the ip and local host of your computer and dns is for other machines on the network But I can't ping web.domain.local :( And typing http://web.domain.local in Firefox doesn't open the web page, but typing IP it does. If I type 10.0.0.8 in Firefox I get the home page. As I mentioned I also have Winwdows in VirtualBox VM and there everything works ok - ping works and also Firefox opens web.domain.local without problems. If you're bodging up faux domain names, you might have to fiddle quite a few things to get it to work. I found it easier to run my own domain name server, with records for local domain names, and have all my local computers use my domain name server. When I enter in my hosts file this line: 10.0.0.18 web.domain.local then I can ping the web server from my Fedora laptop... any ideas? -- http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/ linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org. ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
problem with gmerlin library
Hello there, I was trying to install open movie editor, for which gmerlin library is essential. I tried to install it through source as it is not available through yum. I was able to install it properly without any errors, but while installing open movie editor, Its not able to locate its library. I even tried to provide its path through by hand with out any luck, I've already tried open movie editor and gmerlin forums and also googled this but no luck, except few others also faced this same problem only on fedora. I am using fedora 10 x86_64 gnome. Could any one help. Thanks in advance. -- --- Anurag Garg Ph: (+91) (11) 2301 4504 Nehru Planetarium Fax:(+91) (11) 2301 6936 Teen Murti HouseEmail: anu...@nehruplanetarium.org New Delhi 110011 INDIA Homepage: http://anurag.nehruplanetarium.org - -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: annoying domain.local issue
Tim: And does that DNS server have an answer for queries to that domain name? If it does, does it have the right answer? Valent Turkovic: ping doesn't work from Fedora; # ping web.iskon.local ping: unknown host web.iskon.local # ping samba.iskon.local ping: unknown host web.iskon.local That would appear to suggest that you don't have anything to tell your machine how to use those addresses. No hosts file entries, no DNS records. Unless, you do have a DNS server with that information, but you're querying another one that doesn't. I'd suggest posting your hosts, nsswitch.conf, resolv.conf and smb.conf files for others to see what you're doing, rather than guess. Also the outputs from running nslookup and dig with your problem domain name. Here is mine nsswitch.conf : http://fpaste.org/paste/10360 The important line from that is this: hosts: files mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] dns Which, if I've understood the bit in the middle does: 1. files first look in /etc/hosts, then try 2. mdns4_minimal, and if no answer is found, abort without getting around to querying a DNS server. This doesn't seem sensible to me. Unless you have something special, usually all that's needed is: hosts: files dns If mdns4... is doing something useful for you, perhaps try just removing the notfound=return section. hosts : http://fpaste.org/paste/10361 Pretty much a normal file. It defines local loopback addresses (how the machine refers to itself, the computer equivalent of myself). It's expected that something else will resolve other addresses, such as your DNS server. resolv.conf : http://fpaste.org/paste/10362 Again, looking normal, presuming that there are DNS servers you can query at 10.0.0.6 and 10.0.0.7. $ dig web.domain.local ; DiG 9.5.1-P2-RedHat-9.5.1-2.P2.fc10 web.domain.local ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 53744 ;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;web.domain.local.IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: web.domain.local. 1200IN A 10.0.0.18 ;; Query time: 5 msec ;; SERVER: 10.0.0.6#53(10.0.0.6) ;; WHEN: Tue Apr 28 14:18:17 2009 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 49 This indicates that a DNS server at 10.0.0.6 says that web.domain.local has a numerical IP address of 10.0.0.18. $ nslookup web.domain.local Server: 10.0.0.6 Address: 10.0.0.6#53 Name: web.domain.local Address: 10.0.0.18 Same as above, with the dig query. $ host 10.0.0.18 28.0.0.10.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer web.domain.local. And again. But I can't ping web.domain.local :( That could be a firewall issue, but you'd not expect a comment about unknown host, if it simply couldn't ping something it had an address for. And typing http://web.domain.local in Firefox doesn't open the web page, but typing IP it does. If I type 10.0.0.8 in Firefox I get the home page. Check if both your domain servers can answer that query. Use the dig command, with the address for each name server. e.g. dig web.domain.local @10.0.0.6 and, dig web.domain.local @10.0.0.7 If they both get answers like above, then both domain name servers are working. As I mentioned I also have Winwdows in VirtualBox VM and there everything works ok - ping works and also Firefox opens web.domain.local without problems. Windows can muddy the waters, as it can try other things to try and resolve names, as well. Windows networking (SMB) for instance can find machines without DNS or hostnames (essentially asking for a machine by name, and hoping that it answers for itself, or another machine on the SMB network gives it the address for it). When I enter in my hosts file this line: 10.0.0.18web.domain.local then I can ping the web server from my Fedora laptop... any ideas? See if the comment I made about modifying your /etc/nsswitch.conf file makes any difference. Everything else, configuration-wise, seems normal. -- [...@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.21-78.2.41.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: annoying domain.local issue
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 14:18 +0100, Gbenga Shobowale wrote: the host file is to identify the ip and local host of your computer and dns is for other machines on the network Can be to do that, not only for doing that... -- [...@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.21-78.2.41.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Problem to join Fedora 10 with Win2k3 AD
Hi, When I joined my FC10 with Win2k3 AD, its occurred error; [r...@aakbar ~]# system-config-authentication Shutting down Winbind services:[ OK ] Starting Winbind services: [ OK ] [/usr/bin/net join -w Ic -S pklhradc2.i2c.com -U ServerUser] Enter ServerUser's password:... Using short domain name -- IC Joined 'AAKBAR' to realm 'i2c.com' DNS update failed! Shutting down Winbind services:[ OK ] Starting Winbind services: Please help me to join fedora with AD. Adeel Akbar -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: annoying domain.local issue
On 04/28/2009 09:03 AM, Valent Turkovic wrote: The same issue is also with Ubuntu 9.04 I can't ping web.domain.local but I get IP via nslookup and I can ping the IP address. Something is fishy, and I guess I didn't configure it properly but I can't seam to see what I'm doing wrong. Let's go back to basics. You can to to System/Administration/Network, and edit your connection. You can either enter the DNS information in the DNS tab or in the General Tab, check Automatically Obtain DNS information... Either should do it. -- Jerry Feldman g...@blu.org Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id: 537C5846 PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
nVidia vs. ATI graphics card for fedora
Hi, I am ordering a souped-up workstation and I was wondering which graphics card is preferable for running fedora: a 256 MB PCIe x16 nVidia NVS 290, Dual Monitor capable or a ATI Fire GL V3600 256MB, Dual Monitor DVI Capable ATI3600 What would you suggest? I do not need huge 3-d acceleration and stuff, but want it to work well. Please let me know if I should provide more information. Best wishes, Trotter -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: nVidia vs. ATI graphics card for fedora
Le 28/04/2009 16:25, Globe Trotter a écrit : Hi, I am ordering a souped-up workstation and I was wondering which graphics card is preferable for running fedora: a 256 MB PCIe x16 nVidia NVS 290, Dual Monitor capable or a ATI Fire GL V3600 256MB, Dual Monitor DVI Capable ATI3600 What would you suggest? I do not need huge 3-d acceleration and stuff, but want it to work well. Please let me know if I should provide more information. Best wishes, Trotter I would personnaly choose a nvidia card, and I would use the proprietary driver. Every-day user-experience is more smooth and looks prettier to me (windows rendering, refresh, switch, and so on) with the proprietary drivers. (Same for ATI imho). -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: nVidia vs. ATI graphics card for fedora
Globe Trotter wrote: Hi, I am ordering a souped-up workstation and I was wondering which graphics card is preferable for running fedora: a 256 MB PCIe x16 nVidia NVS 290, Dual Monitor capable or a ATI Fire GL V3600 256MB, Dual Monitor DVI Capable ATI3600 What would you suggest? I do not need huge 3-d acceleration and stuff, but want it to work well. Please let me know if I should provide more information. Best wishes, Trotter Trotter, If you like re-configuring or re-installing drivers at ever kernel change then OK you can do either. The bad news is ATI and nVidia are not fully natively supported in XWindows in most circumstances without the proprietary drivers. There are repos that support these two and work is being done for native support... but, alas it is SLOW in coming. Tips: If you choose either of these, only do so with the intent to CAREFULLY update kernels and drivers. Don't try updating the kernel if there is no driver update available, you may regret this decision. Next, try getting an older model ATI or nVidia card, support is easier for the older models than the newer ones. Linux is also a bit slow at getting newer cards supported natively, without going to proprietary drivers. James signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: nVidia vs. ATI graphics card for fedora
Thanks very much! I will try for an older graphics card. Do I have options other than ATI or nVidia that would not have these issues. I do not want to mess with kernel and driver re-configurations. I expect it to be a month before my machine actually shows up, btw. Best wishes, Trotter --- On Tue, 4/28/09, James Kosin jko...@beta.intcomgrp.com wrote: From: James Kosin jko...@beta.intcomgrp.com Subject: Re: nVidia vs. ATI graphics card for fedora To: itsme_...@yahoo.com, Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora-list@redhat.com Date: Tuesday, April 28, 2009, 10:43 AM Globe Trotter wrote: Hi, I am ordering a souped-up workstation and I was wondering which graphics card is preferable for running fedora: a 256 MB PCIe x16 nVidia NVS 290, Dual Monitor capable or a ATI Fire GL V3600 256MB, Dual Monitor DVI Capable ATI3600 What would you suggest? I do not need huge 3-d acceleration and stuff, but want it to work well. Please let me know if I should provide more information. Best wishes, Trotter Trotter, If you like re-configuring or re-installing drivers at ever kernel change then OK you can do either. The bad news is ATI and nVidia are not fully natively supported in XWindows in most circumstances without the proprietary drivers. There are repos that support these two and work is being done for native support... but, alas it is SLOW in coming. Tips: If you choose either of these, only do so with the intent to CAREFULLY update kernels and drivers. Don't try updating the kernel if there is no driver update available, you may regret this decision. Next, try getting an older model ATI or nVidia card, support is easier for the older models than the newer ones. Linux is also a bit slow at getting newer cards supported natively, without going to proprietary drivers. James -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: nVidia vs. ATI graphics card for fedora
Around 04:17pm on Tuesday, April 28, 2009 (UK time), Globe Trotter scrawled: Thanks very much! I will try for an older graphics card. Do I have options other than ATI or nVidia that would not have these issues. I do not want to mess with kernel and driver re-configurations. I expect it to be a month before my machine actually shows up, btw. I have NOT used them myself, but from what I have read here Intel seems to the simplest option. However I have used the open source (default) drivers for both ATI and Nvidia without problems. Steve -- (o www.stevesearle.com //\ Powered by Fedora V_/_No MS products were used in the creation of this message 16:18:48 up 22 days, 3:41, 1 user, load average: 0.02, 0.01, 0.02 pgpCCW746bD2I.pgp Description: PGP signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
gallery2 update that came out today.
The update will break the gallery; however there is a workaround. Before you run the upgrade from http://host/gallery2/upgrade, you need to add the following symlink ln -s /usr/share/php/Smarty /usr/share/gallery2/lib/smarty If you have already run the upgrade, you can still just add the symlink and it will work. I only say to add it before, to minimize the system check errors. After the symlink is added, the upgrade system checks detect 3 files missing (2 documentation files and a jar file, g2_db2.jar) and 2 modified (Smarty_Compiler.class.php and modifier.debug_print_var.php). These do not seem to present an issue. As far as I can tell, everything is working after the symlink was created. Jason Dickerson -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Question about upgrading Fedora (from fc6 to FC10)
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 04:15:07 -0700, Mike Cloaked mike.cloa...@gmail.com wrote: If I had that system my inclination would not be to do an upgrade but to do a clean install of F10. Before doing so I would backup the user areas and any system config files to a safe drive. Then after installing F10 I would I would also recommend a fresh install at this point. However I would consider going right to F11. The preview release is out today and not too much is supposed to change before the final release. Most of the stuff you want to back up is in /home, /etc and /var. You might also be using /usr/local. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: nVidia vs. ATI graphics card for fedora
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 07:25:52 -0700, Globe Trotter itsme_...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, I am ordering a souped-up workstation and I was wondering which graphics card is preferable for running fedora: a 256 MB PCIe x16 nVidia NVS 290, Dual Monitor capable or a ATI Fire GL V3600 256MB, Dual Monitor DVI Capable ATI3600 What would you suggest? I do not need huge 3-d acceleration and stuff, but want it to work well. I am using a FireGL 3400 at work and it is working well with F11 (right now). There have been points during this rawhide when it didn't, but it looks like but KMS and 3D will be working for the release (as they are right now). If you use an nVidia card you will need to use the propietary drivers to get 3D acceleration. The default drivers for nVidia are switching from nv to nouveau in F11. My understanding is that this provides some improvement, but you still only get 2D acceleration. P.S. I have some bias in that I want to support companies like AMD/ATI and Intel when they make the data for how to use their hardware public as compared to companies like nVidia that don't. So while I have some scrounged nVidia hardware around, when I actually buy new stuff I have been going with ATI. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Apache Virtual Server
- Mensaje original De: Dennis Kaptain dkapt...@yahoo.com.mx Para: fedora-list@redhat.com Enviado: lunes, 27 de abril, 2009 12:59:46 Asunto: Apache Virtual Server I am playing with the Zend Framework on my laptop. In my reading of Zend documentation it looks like Zend wants a certain directory structure so I created: /var/www/html/QuickStart/ /var/www/html/QuickStart/application/ /var/www/html/QuickStart/application/controllers/ /var/www/html/QuickStart/application/views/ /var/www/html/QuickStart/application/views/scripts/ /var/www/html/QuickStart/library/ /var/www/html/QuickStart/public/ The last directory 'public' wants to be the DocumentRoot I want to set up a virtual server whose DocumentRoot is /var/www/html/QuickStart/public my machine's name is confianza and it is running Fedora 10 [r...@confianza conf]# uname -a Linux confianza 2.6.27.21-170.2.56.fc10.i686 #1 SMP Mon Mar 23 23:37:54 EDT 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux I set up /etc/hosts so both confianza and confianzazend resolve to 127.0.0.1 [r...@confianza conf]# grep 127.0.0.1 /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1localhost.localdomain localhost confianza confianzazend My current apache web server uses /var/www/html as it's DocumentRoot and runs fine. [r...@confianza conf]# yum list installed | grep -i http httpd.i386 2.2.11-2.fc10 installed httpd-tools.i3862.2.11-2.fc10 installed jakarta-commons-httpclient.i386 1:3.1-0.3.fc10 installed system-config-httpd.noarch 5:1.4.4-2.fc10 installed [r...@confianza conf]# yum list installed | grep -i zend php-ZendFramework.noarch I edited /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf as follows: # ServerName confianza:80 NameVirtualHost *:80 # ServerName confianza DocumentRoot /var/www/html # ServerName confianzazend DocumentRoot /var/www/html/QuickStart/public I then restart httpd [r...@confianza html]# service httpd restart Stopping httpd:[ OK ] Starting httpd:[ OK ] I want http://confianza to return the contents of /var/www/html I want http://confianzazend to return the contents of /var/www/html/QuickStart What is happening is that both http://confianza and http://confianzazend are both returning the contents of /var/www/html I've looked at several web pages and they all say the same thing, this should just work (TM). It seems simple enough yet my problem persists. What else do I need to do? Thanks Just a little more information from /var/log/httpd/access_log When I request http://localhost I get an entry that says 127.0.0.1 - - [28/Apr/2009:11:52:08 -0500] GET / HTTP/1.1 200 3488 - Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042708 Fedora/3.0.10-1.fc10 Firefox/3.0.10 When I request http://confianza I get an entry that says 127.0.0.1 - - [28/Apr/2009:11:53:06 -0500] GET / HTTP/1.1 200 3488 - Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042708 Fedora/3.0.10-1.fc10 Firefox/3.0.10 When I request http://confianzazend I get an entry that says 127.0.0.1 - - [28/Apr/2009:11:53:54 -0500] GET / HTTP/1.1 200 3492 - Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042708 Fedora/3.0.10-1.fc10 Firefox/3.0.10 All three entries are identical get requests for / Yet the php command ?php echo $_SERVER['SERVER_NAME'].br\n; ? in /var/www/html/index.php prints out 'localhost', 'confianza', or 'confianzazend' depending on what url I call. I have a feeling I'm on to it here but I'm not sure where to go next. DK ¡Obtén la mejor experiencia en la web! Descarga gratis el nuevo Internet Explorer 8. http://downloads.yahoo.com/ieak8/?l=mx -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
RE: Apache Virtual Server
print your complete httpd.conf file, as well as the /etc/host file let's take a look at what you have. -Original Message- From: fedora-list-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:fedora-list-boun...@redhat.com]on Behalf Of Dennis Kaptain Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 9:59 AM To: Community assistance, encouragement,and advice for using Fedora. Subject: Re: Apache Virtual Server - Mensaje original De: Dennis Kaptain dkapt...@yahoo.com.mx Para: fedora-list@redhat.com Enviado: lunes, 27 de abril, 2009 12:59:46 Asunto: Apache Virtual Server I am playing with the Zend Framework on my laptop. In my reading of Zend documentation it looks like Zend wants a certain directory structure so I created: /var/www/html/QuickStart/ /var/www/html/QuickStart/application/ /var/www/html/QuickStart/application/controllers/ /var/www/html/QuickStart/application/views/ /var/www/html/QuickStart/application/views/scripts/ /var/www/html/QuickStart/library/ /var/www/html/QuickStart/public/ The last directory 'public' wants to be the DocumentRoot I want to set up a virtual server whose DocumentRoot is /var/www/html/QuickStart/public my machine's name is confianza and it is running Fedora 10 [r...@confianza conf]# uname -a Linux confianza 2.6.27.21-170.2.56.fc10.i686 #1 SMP Mon Mar 23 23:37:54 EDT 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux I set up /etc/hosts so both confianza and confianzazend resolve to 127.0.0.1 [r...@confianza conf]# grep 127.0.0.1 /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1localhost.localdomain localhost confianza confianzazend My current apache web server uses /var/www/html as it's DocumentRoot and runs fine. [r...@confianza conf]# yum list installed | grep -i http httpd.i386 2.2.11-2.fc10 installed httpd-tools.i3862.2.11-2.fc10 installed jakarta-commons-httpclient.i386 1:3.1-0.3.fc10 installed system-config-httpd.noarch 5:1.4.4-2.fc10 installed [r...@confianza conf]# yum list installed | grep -i zend php-ZendFramework.noarch I edited /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf as follows: # ServerName confianza:80 NameVirtualHost *:80 # ServerName confianza DocumentRoot /var/www/html # ServerName confianzazend DocumentRoot /var/www/html/QuickStart/public I then restart httpd [r...@confianza html]# service httpd restart Stopping httpd:[ OK ] Starting httpd:[ OK ] I want http://confianza to return the contents of /var/www/html I want http://confianzazend to return the contents of /var/www/html/QuickStart What is happening is that both http://confianza and http://confianzazend are both returning the contents of /var/www/html I've looked at several web pages and they all say the same thing, this should just work (TM). It seems simple enough yet my problem persists. What else do I need to do? Thanks Just a little more information from /var/log/httpd/access_log When I request http://localhost I get an entry that says 127.0.0.1 - - [28/Apr/2009:11:52:08 -0500] GET / HTTP/1.1 200 3488 - Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042708 Fedora/3.0.10-1.fc10 Firefox/3.0.10 When I request http://confianza I get an entry that says 127.0.0.1 - - [28/Apr/2009:11:53:06 -0500] GET / HTTP/1.1 200 3488 - Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042708 Fedora/3.0.10-1.fc10 Firefox/3.0.10 When I request http://confianzazend I get an entry that says 127.0.0.1 - - [28/Apr/2009:11:53:54 -0500] GET / HTTP/1.1 200 3492 - Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042708 Fedora/3.0.10-1.fc10 Firefox/3.0.10 All three entries are identical get requests for / Yet the php command ?php echo $_SERVER['SERVER_NAME'].br\n; ? in /var/www/html/index.php prints out 'localhost', 'confianza', or 'confianzazend' depending on what url I call. I have a feeling I'm on to it here but I'm not sure where to go next. DK ¡Obtén la mejor experiencia en la web! Descarga gratis el nuevo Internet Explorer 8. http://downloads.yahoo.com/ieak8/?l=mx -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Apache Virtual Server
print your complete httpd.conf file, as well as the /etc/host file let's take a look at what you have. [r...@confianza conf]# cat /etc/hosts # Do not remove the following line, or various programs # that require network functionality will fail. 127.0.0.1localhost.localdomain localhost 127.0.0.1confianza 127.0.0.1confianzaZend ::1localhost6.localdomain6 localhost6 192.168.0.2amoramor. 192.168.0.3esperanza 192.168.0.4confianza 192.168.0.5 BRNEE2FCB 192.168.0.6glitter 192.168.0.8fe [r...@confianza conf]# cat /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf # # This is the main Apache server configuration file. It contains the # configuration directives that give the server its instructions. # See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/ for detailed information. # In particular, see # URL:http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/directives.html # for a discussion of each configuration directive. # # # Do NOT simply read the instructions in here without understanding # what they do. They're here only as hints or reminders. If you are unsure # consult the online docs. You have been warned. # # The configuration directives are grouped into three basic sections: # 1. Directives that control the operation of the Apache server process as a # whole (the 'global environment'). # 2. Directives that define the parameters of the 'main' or 'default' server, # which responds to requests that aren't handled by a virtual host. # These directives also provide default values for the settings # of all virtual hosts. # 3. Settings for virtual hosts, which allow Web requests to be sent to # different IP addresses or hostnames and have them handled by the # same Apache server process. # # Configuration and logfile names: If the filenames you specify for many # of the server's control files begin with / (or drive:/ for Win32), the # server will use that explicit path. If the filenames do *not* begin # with /, the value of ServerRoot is prepended -- so logs/foo.log # with ServerRoot set to /etc/httpd will be interpreted by the # server as /etc/httpd/logs/foo.log. # ### Section 1: Global Environment # # The directives in this section affect the overall operation of Apache, # such as the number of concurrent requests it can handle or where it # can find its configuration files. # # # Don't give away too much information about all the subcomponents # we are running. Comment out this line if you don't mind remote sites # finding out what major optional modules you are running ServerTokens OS # # ServerRoot: The top of the directory tree under which the server's # configuration, error, and log files are kept. # # NOTE! If you intend to place this on an NFS (or otherwise network) # mounted filesystem then please read the LockFile documentation # (available at URL:http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mpm_common.html#lockfile); # you will save yourself a lot of trouble. # # Do NOT add a slash at the end of the directory path. # ServerRoot /etc/httpd # # PidFile: The file in which the server should record its process # identification number when it starts. # PidFile run/httpd.pid # # Timeout: The number of seconds before receives and sends time out. # Timeout 120 # # KeepAlive: Whether or not to allow persistent connections (more than # one request per connection). Set to Off to deactivate. # KeepAlive Off # # MaxKeepAliveRequests: The maximum number of requests to allow # during a persistent connection. Set to 0 to allow an unlimited amount. # We recommend you leave this number high, for maximum performance. # MaxKeepAliveRequests 100 # # KeepAliveTimeout: Number of seconds to wait for the next request from the # same client on the same connection. # KeepAliveTimeout 15 ## ## Server-Pool Size Regulation (MPM specific) ## # prefork MPM # StartServers: number of server processes to start # MinSpareServers: minimum number of server processes which are kept spare # MaxSpareServers: maximum number of server processes which are kept spare # ServerLimit: maximum value for MaxClients for the lifetime of the server # MaxClients: maximum number of server processes allowed to start # MaxRequestsPerChild: maximum number of requests a server process serves IfModule prefork.c StartServers 8 MinSpareServers5 MaxSpareServers 20 ServerLimit 256 MaxClients 256 MaxRequestsPerChild 4000 /IfModule # worker MPM # StartServers: initial number of server processes to start # MaxClients: maximum number of simultaneous client connections # MinSpareThreads: minimum number of worker threads which are kept spare # MaxSpareThreads: maximum number of worker threads which are kept spare # ThreadsPerChild: constant number of worker threads in each server process # MaxRequestsPerChild: maximum number of requests a server process serves IfModule worker.c StartServers 2 MaxClients 150 MinSpareThreads 25 MaxSpareThreads 75
Re: nVidia vs. ATI graphics card for fedora
James Kosin wrote: Globe Trotter wrote: Hi, I am ordering a souped-up workstation and I was wondering which graphics card is preferable for running fedora: a 256 MB PCIe x16 nVidia NVS 290, Dual Monitor capable or a ATI Fire GL V3600 256MB, Dual Monitor DVI CapableATI3600 What would you suggest? I do not need huge 3-d acceleration and stuff, but want it to work well. Please let me know if I should provide more information. Best wishes, Trotter Trotter, If you like re-configuring or re-installing drivers at ever kernel change then OK you can do either. The bad news is ATI and nVidia are not fully natively supported in XWindows in most circumstances without the proprietary drivers. There are repos that support these two and work is being done for native support... but, alas it is SLOW in coming. Tips: If you choose either of these, only do so with the intent to CAREFULLY update kernels and drivers. Don't try updating the kernel if there is no driver update available, you may regret this decision. Next, try getting an older model ATI or nVidia card, support is easier for the older models than the newer ones. Linux is also a bit slow at getting newer cards supported natively, without going to proprietary drivers. I think you will not have any issues with upgrading kernels using recent rpmfusion packages. I believe the above advice is obsolete. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: nVidia vs. ATI graphics card for fedora
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:30:21 -0400 Neal Becker wrote: I think you will not have any issues with upgrading kernels using recent rpmfusion packages. Especially if you install the akmod packages, so it can build the module from source if the updated binary isn't yet in the repo mirror. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: nVidia vs. ATI graphics card for fedora
FWIW, I've got dual-head working with an ATI Radeon X1550. Nothing special about my system except a custom xorg.conf. I'm using the standard radeon driver, so I don't worry at all about kernel updates. Just to let you know that it just works, with the custom config caveat. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Question about upgrading Fedora (from fc6 to FC10)
Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 04:15:07 -0700, Mike Cloaked mike.cloa...@gmail.com wrote: If I had that system my inclination would not be to do an upgrade but to do a clean install of F10. Before doing so I would backup the user areas and any system config files to a safe drive. Then after installing F10 I would I would also recommend a fresh install at this point. However I would consider going right to F11. The preview release is out today and not too much is supposed to change before the final release. Most of the stuff you want to back up is in /home, /etc and /var. You might also be using /usr/local. in agreement with above, and in addition, to find your configuration files, you can use; 'find / -anewer /root/install.log -print | sort my.new.files' to find all files newer than when passwd was built. then; 'grep /etc/ my.new.files my.new.etc.files' 'grep /home/ my.new.files my.new.home.files' 'grep /usr/local/ my.new.files my.new.usr.local.files' 'grep /var/ my.new.files my.new.var.files' granted, you will have files created with new dates that you will not want, but you can go thru 'my.*.files' and edit them out. then you will have a file/files to use for input to your backup. after you edit 'my.new.files', or 'my.*.files' you can back up new files you want to save with; 'cat my.*.files | cpio -p -adm /path/to/save/to' see: 'man cat', 'man cpio', 'man find', 'man grep', 'man sort'. just a suggestion, you may rather use a gui backup program, either way, you will have to eliminate non configuration files. -- peace out. tc,hago. g . in a free world without fences, who needs gates. ** help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today ** to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it; to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look at* it. ** learn linux: 'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html 'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/ 'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html 'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Editor to program in C
On 5 Apr 2009, at 7:32PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Andras Simon wrote: There may be reasons for not liking vi or emacs, but their being useless is certainly not one of them. They're useless compared to editors which you can just start to use with no learning curve. Emacs is my editor of choice, and I disagree it has a learning curve. If all you want is to type and save files, its as easy as any other simple GUI based editor. If you want to get clever, then yes it takes some learning, but it is ultimately more powerful than most others too. vi on the other hand ;) Chris -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Editor to program in C
Hi, Ignore all answers and try it :-) Remember that one man's meat is another man's poison. You have plenty of choices in Linux, and the work you save will be readable in any of the edtors, so you have nothing to lose. Thats the best piece of advice I've heard so far in this thread ;) -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Editor to program in C
My personal preference is to use emacs for development, but to use vi for remote editing and quick editing of some files. Never managed to get on with vi. just doesn't do it for me. For remote terminal sessions, I use 'emacs -nw' ... Chris -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Remooving U3 from USB drive.
Rick Stevens wrote: Beartooth wrote: On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 07:56:51 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote: A question which appeared on fedora-list recently was how to remove U#W from a USB drive. I did not see a resolution until the following web link: http://www.u3.com/uninstall I've been trying to do that, and have a long thread going at http://forum.eeeuser.com/viewforum.php?id=1 called How to wipe thumbdrives?? There is one post in that thread with a technique using dd; I haven't tried it yet, but probably will. I have a couple of those buggers as well. I think the dd you're thinking of is something like: dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdb bs=1M count=2048 or something like that...the idea being to write zeros to the entire drive, wiping out its partition table and all. It does NOT work on the SanDisk Cruzers. I ran the dd three times on each, writing all 4GB of data to them (took forever!). Fired up fdisk and it reported a gparted-type partition table on them. The partition table should have been wiped out via the dd. I then ran gparted itself. It did NOT complain about a missing partition table (it should have), but it did say there were no defined partitions. Whoopee. Yeah, no partitions, but a gparted-style partition table that can't be done away with. Sheesh. snip If I could find non SanDisk Cruzer thumbdrives here, I'd never buy another. I now buy nothing but PNY or Apacer thumbdrives. If I'm in doubt and if the package says that something's preloaded, I treat them like toxic waste. All I can say is that users should complain to the manufacturers and see about getting refunds. For a $20 drive it doesn't seem worth the effort. Enough complaints could be enough to get some success. I have contacted Sandisk and said I won't purchase any products until I see a way to remove this virus without having Windows. Note that the U3 site does ask for a reason for removing the software. I have complained a couple of times. There was even a thread on their forum about a Linux tool. That was a waste of time. If you search, there are U3 key loggers and other nasties available. -- Robin Laing -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Editor to program in C
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Jose Celestino wrote: Words by Tim [Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 01:20:31AM +1030]: There's one thing worse than vi, and that's emacs. ;-) And vice-versa :) That, sir, is the finest response I have ever seen. You've settled the entire vi/emacs war in two words. I bow low to your obviously superior debate skills. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: nVidia vs. ATI graphics card for fedora
Globe Trotter wrote: Hi, I am ordering a souped-up workstation and I was wondering which graphics card is preferable for running fedora: a 256 MB PCIe x16 nVidia NVS 290, Dual Monitor capable or a ATI Fire GL V3600 256MB, Dual Monitor DVI Capable ATI3600 What would you suggest? I do not need huge 3-d acceleration and stuff, but want it to work well. Please let me know if I should provide more information. Best wishes, Trotter I would normally recommend Nvidia as I have used them since the beginning of Fedora with little or no problems after fighting with ATI for over a month. But with AMD purchasing ATI, I would look at them as well. I have a computer with an Intel video chip built on the motherboard but it doesn't like Fedora. It is the one chip that is not well supported in Linux. Replaced it with an Nvidia. The AKMOD package is supposed to work like a dream but there are times that it hasn't. If you need 3D, I can only say that Nvidia has been great for me. -- Robin Laing -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
f10livecd installs but wont boot, Error 2
I finally got the f10liveinstallcd to install, to sda1 it evidently went thru w no errors --unchkd sda,sdb initially then went to custom install --chose not mbr, instead firstsector of sda1 --the grub.conf uses UUID for its root= I copied the grub.conf stanza to my fc5 grub.conf, it is in control title Fedora (2.6.27.5-117.fc10.i686) root (hd0,0) kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.27.5-117.fc10.i686 ro root=UUID=4e1021d9-e637-4 d03-97cb-fdd0d4b4cbee rhgb quiet initrd /boot/initrd-2.6.27.5-117.fc10.i686.img it all looks normal to me, altho use of UUID instead of /dev/sda1 i did not expect But, on attempting to boot it lists the above kernel line, followed by Error 2: Bad file or directory type I have seen some google msgs w this response but no help to me I ran across one google msg re liveinstall cd saying it installed fine, but locked up on booting-- no further detail also another msg saying wouldnt boot if using scsi disks ( I am) but again no detail is the liveinstallcd known to have problems booting? any advice? try f10dvd instead? Jack -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: nVidia vs. ATI graphics card for fedora
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 08:17:48 -0700, Globe Trotter itsme_...@yahoo.com wrote: Thanks very much! I will try for an older graphics card. Do I have options other than ATI or nVidia that would not have these issues. I do not want to mess with kernel and driver re-configurations. I expect it to be a month before my machine actually shows up, btw. The ATI information is a bit outdated. Support for r5xx cards is pretty good in F11. r6xx and r7xx stuff is still a work in progress, but 2D support is already working. This is with the radeon driver (xorg-x11-drv-ati) not the propietary driver. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: nVidia vs. ATI graphics card for fedora
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 10:43 -0400, James Kosin wrote: Globe Trotter wrote: Hi, I am ordering a souped-up workstation and I was wondering which graphics card is preferable for running fedora: a 256 MB PCIe x16 nVidia NVS 290, Dual Monitor capable or a ATI Fire GL V3600 256MB, Dual Monitor DVI Capable ATI3600 What would you suggest? I do not need huge 3-d acceleration and stuff, but want it to work well. Please let me know if I should provide more information. Best wishes, Trotter Trotter, If you like re-configuring or re-installing drivers at ever kernel change then OK you can do either. The bad news is ATI and nVidia are not fully natively supported in XWindows in most circumstances without the proprietary drivers. There are repos that support these two and work is being done for native support... but, alas it is SLOW in coming. Tips: If you choose either of these, only do so with the intent to CAREFULLY update kernels and drivers. Don't try updating the kernel if there is no driver update available, you may regret this decision. Next, try getting an older model ATI or nVidia card, support is easier for the older models than the newer ones. Linux is also a bit slow at getting newer cards supported natively, without going to proprietary drivers. It's worth pointing out that RPMfusion provides RPMs with kernel modules for the proprietary versions of both drivers. The akmod-nvidia RPM seamlessly rebuilds the driver when a new kernel is installed. I assume that the same applies for the ATI packages, but I haven't used them. James -- Matthew Saltzman Clemson University Math Sciences mjs AT clemson DOT edu http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Seagate disk problems (NCQ bug???)
After running flawlessly for 6+ months I just had my Seagate
ST31500343AS (w. SD35 firmware) flake out. Does this look like the NCQ
bug or just a random event? The final error msg was around the time the
machine hung hard.
Apr 28 04:26:29 arbol kernel: ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 irq_stat 0x0040, PHY
RDY changed irq 22
Apr 28 04:26:29 arbol kernel: ata1: softreset failed (device not ready)
Apr 28 04:26:29 arbol kernel: ata1: failed due to HW bug, retry pmp=0
Apr 28 04:26:29 arbol kernel: ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl
300)
Apr 28 04:26:29 arbol kernel: ata1.00: ATA-8: ST31500343AS, SD35, max UDMA/133
Apr 28 04:26:29 arbol kernel: ata1.00: 2930277168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ
(depth 31/32)
Apr 28 04:26:29 arbol kernel: ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
Apr 28 06:17:02 arbol kernel: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x50 SAct 0x1 SErr
0x90a02 action 0xe frozen
Apr 28 06:17:02 arbol kernel: ata1.00: irq_stat 0x0040, PHY RDY changed
Apr 28 06:17:02 arbol kernel: ata1: SError: { RecovComm Persist HostInt
PHYRdyChg 10B8B }
Apr 28 06:17:02 arbol kernel: ata1.00: cmd 60/08:00:e1:81:24/00:00:74:00:00/40
tag 0 ncq 4096 in
Apr 28 06:17:02 arbol kernel: res 40/00:00:e1:81:24/00:00:74:00:00/40
Emask 0x50 (ATA bus error)
Apr 28 06:17:02 arbol kernel: ata1.00: status: { DRDY }
Apr 28 06:17:02 arbol kernel: ata1: hard resetting link
Apr 28 06:17:04 arbol kernel: ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl
300)
Apr 28 06:17:09 arbol kernel: ata1.00: qc timeout (cmd 0xec)
Apr 28 06:17:09 arbol kernel: ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error,
err_mask=0x4)
Apr 28 06:17:09 arbol kernel: ata1.00: revalidation failed (errno=-5)
Apr 28 06:17:09 arbol kernel: ata1: hard resetting link
Apr 28 06:17:11 arbol kernel: ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl
300)
Apr 28 06:17:21 arbol kernel: ata1.00: qc timeout (cmd 0xec)
Apr 28 06:17:21 arbol kernel: ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error,
err_mask=0x4)
Apr 28 06:17:21 arbol kernel: ata1.00: revalidation failed (errno=-5)
Apr 28 06:17:21 arbol kernel: ata1: limiting SATA link speed to 1.5 Gbps
Apr 28 06:17:21 arbol kernel: ata1: hard resetting link
Apr 28 06:17:22 arbol kernel: ata1: softreset failed (device not ready)
Apr 28 06:17:22 arbol kernel: ata1: failed due to HW bug, retry pmp=0
Apr 28 06:17:22 arbol kernel: ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl
310)
Apr 28 06:17:22 arbol kernel: ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
Apr 28 06:17:22 arbol kernel: ata1: EH complete
Apr 28 06:17:22 arbol kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 2930277168 512-byte hardware
sectors (1500302 MB)
Apr 28 06:17:22 arbol kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
Apr 28 06:17:22 arbol kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read
cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
Apr 28 06:24:03 arbol kernel: ata1: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x90200
action 0xe frozen
Apr 28 06:24:03 arbol kernel: ata1: irq_stat 0x0040, PHY RDY changed
Apr 28 06:24:03 arbol kernel: ata1: SError: { Persist PHYRdyChg 10B8B }
Apr 28 06:24:03 arbol kernel: ata1: hard resetting link
Apr 28 06:24:05 arbol kernel: ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl
310)
Apr 28 06:24:10 arbol kernel: ata1.00: qc timeout (cmd 0xec)
Apr 28 06:24:10 arbol kernel: ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error,
err_mask=0x4)
Apr 28 06:24:10 arbol kernel: ata1.00: revalidation failed (errno=-5)
Apr 28 06:24:10 arbol kernel: ata1: hard resetting link
Apr 28 06:24:12 arbol kernel: ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl
310)
Apr 28 06:24:22 arbol kernel: ata1.00: qc timeout (cmd 0xec)
Apr 28 06:24:22 arbol kernel: ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error,
err_mask=0x4)
Apr 28 06:24:22 arbol kernel: ata1.00: revalidation failed (errno=-5)
Apr 28 06:24:22 arbol kernel: ata1: hard resetting link
Apr 28 06:24:23 arbol kernel: ata1: softreset failed (device not ready)
Apr 28 06:24:23 arbol kernel: ata1: failed due to HW bug, retry pmp=0
Apr 28 06:24:23 arbol kernel: ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl
310)
Apr 28 06:24:24 arbol kernel: ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
Apr 28 06:24:24 arbol kernel: ata1: EH complete
Apr 28 06:24:24 arbol kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 2930277168 512-byte hardware
sectors (1500302 MB)
Apr 28 06:24:24 arbol kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
Apr 28 06:24:24 arbol kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read
cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
Apr 28 06:41:26 arbol kernel: ata1: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x90200
action 0xe frozen
Apr 28 06:41:26 arbol kernel: ata1: irq_stat 0x0040, PHY RDY changed
Apr 28 06:41:26 arbol kernel: ata1: SError: { Persist PHYRdyChg 10B8B }
Apr 28 06:41:26 arbol kernel: ata1: hard resetting link
Apr 28 06:41:28 arbol kernel: ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl
310)
Apr 28 06:41:33 arbol kernel: ata1.00: qc timeout (cmd 0xec)
Apr 28 06:41:33 arbol kernel: ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error,
err_mask=0x4)
Apr 28 06:41:33 arbol kernel:
Re: insmod and WIFI - was Re: FC10 and NDISwrapper
Gary Stainburn wrote: hybrid_wl/wl.ko That's the proprietary driver from Broadcom. People are suggesting you use the Free Software b43 driver, not the proprietary Broadcom wl. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: F10 - KDE - Wake from screensaver lock screen
Craig White wrote: Since the last round of updates, it seems that when I wake the screen from sleep/non-use, it shows me the entire screen instead of a dark background while I am prompted to enter a password. Blank screen - Start Automatically/10 minutes - Require Password After 60 seconds Is this a bug? Definitely looks like one. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Video Card for SuperMicro SuperWorkstation 5046A-XB
Steven P. Ulrick wrote: What I am now after is a video card. Looks like Intel integrated isn't an option with your choice of motherboard (which is unfortunate, because those work best), so I'd suggest one of the non-HD Radeons. Radeon HDs are a waste of money, they're more expensive and they don't have OpenGL support in the Free Software drivers yet. See http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/ATIRadeon (towards the bottom) for the full breakdown of what works and what doesn't work yet (basically, up to X1950 is fully supported, with 2D and 3D acceleration). Kevin Kofler -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: strange ImageMagick dependencies
Rex Dieter wrote: If you want a fully-functional ImageMagick, all of those items are truly needed. Well, the big problem there is transitive dep chains, e.g.: libgnome - fedora-gnome-theme - nodoka-metacity-theme - metacity (This one sucks particularly, as it drags several parts of the GNOME desktop into any system which should only need the libs. It appears still to be there even in the upcoming F12 Rawhide. We don't notice it on the live images as firstboot requires metacity anyway. On my F9 system, yum remove metacity wants to remove 105 packages!) Another one is librsvg2 requiring several GNOME libs, which require another whole bunch of GNOME libs. Quite unfortunate for a library which should just handle SVG files. (They use Cairo, which makes some sense, but also stuff like gnome-vfs2.) This is how libgnome gets dragged in in the first place (along with tons of other GNOME stuff). Interestingly, though, gnome-vfs2 is no longer required in F9 (I guess they ported to the new gvfs) and this seems to alleviate the deps mess somehow (yum remove metacity doesn't want to remove ImageMagick on F9). So upgrading to a supported Fedora release should reduce the amount of problems for the OP. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: nVidia vs. ATI graphics card for fedora
Globe Trotter wrote: Thanks very much! I will try for an older graphics card. Do I have options other than ATI or nVidia that would not have these issues. I do not want to mess with kernel and driver re-configurations. I expect it to be a month before my machine actually shows up, btw. See: http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/ATIRadeon (towards the bottom) for what cards are fully supported by the Free Software driver (and thus work out of the box in Fedora in both 2D and 3D) at this stage (in short: = X1950). Kevin Kofler -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
