Reminder: Fedora Board IRC meeting 1800 UTC 2009-05-05
** Note the different date and time! The change was necessary to accommodate some of the Board members for this month. The Board's schedule may change after elections and appointments are complete, to make sure all members can attend as often as possible. The Board is holding its monthly public meeting on Thursday, June 4, 2009, at 1700 UTC on IRC Freenode. For this meeting, the public is invited to do the following: * Join #fedora-board-meeting to see the Board's conversation. * Join #fedora-board-questions to discuss topics and post questions. This channel is read/write for everyone. The moderator will voice people from the queue, one at a time, in the #fedora-board-meeting channel. We'll limit time per voice as needed to give everyone in the queue a chance to be heard. The Board may reserve some time at the top of the hour to cover any agenda items as appropriate. We look forward to seeing you at the meeting! -- Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug pgpmTfHjqCCc2.pgp Description: PGP signature -- fedora-announce-list mailing list fedora-announce-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-announce-list
Re: Agenda for the 2009-05-26 Packaging Committee meeting
On 05/26/2009 10:27 PM, Iain Arnell wrote: On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 7:10 AM, Tim Lauridsen tim.laurid...@googlemail.com wrote: soft-deps (Suggests/Recommends) is really hard to handle at the depsolver level. A depsolver need to now the hard ones, not stuff like 'it would look very nice to have pink bracelet to my little pony'. It is hard to make good decisions based on that, a asking the user every time is not a good solution IMO. You will need to take a popquiz every time you what to install a package. I can see that the information can be useful at a high level gui or in some kind of appstore. People there have bought 'foo' have also bought 'bar'. But at the lowlevel like rpm/yum is not very useful, because we don't have the needed infomation to make a good decision. I wouldn't think it's that hard to implement. When installing a new package, simply treat Suggests as Requires; when removing a package just ignore Suggests completely. Only upgrading adds a little complexity - if new version Suggests something that the old version doesn't, treat it as Requires (so that I get new optional pony accessories automatically), otherwise ignore it (so that I can throw away that optional pink bracelet and not have it come back every time I update). Note that that would be horrible behaviour for also keeping a minimal packageset. -Toshio -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Agenda for the 2009-05-26 Packaging Committee meeting
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 23:00 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On 05/26/2009 10:27 PM, Iain Arnell wrote: On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 7:10 AM, Tim Lauridsen tim.laurid...@googlemail.com wrote: soft-deps (Suggests/Recommends) is really hard to handle at the depsolver level. A depsolver need to now the hard ones, not stuff like 'it would look very nice to have pink bracelet to my little pony'. It is hard to make good decisions based on that, a asking the user every time is not a good solution IMO. You will need to take a popquiz every time you what to install a package. I can see that the information can be useful at a high level gui or in some kind of appstore. People there have bought 'foo' have also bought 'bar'. But at the lowlevel like rpm/yum is not very useful, because we don't have the needed infomation to make a good decision. I wouldn't think it's that hard to implement. When installing a new package, simply treat Suggests as Requires; when removing a package just ignore Suggests completely. Only upgrading adds a little complexity - if new version Suggests something that the old version doesn't, treat it as Requires (so that I get new optional pony accessories automatically), otherwise ignore it (so that I can throw away that optional pink bracelet and not have it come back every time I update). Note that that would be horrible behaviour for also keeping a minimal packageset. Iain's suggestion is how it is handled in Mandriva. There is a parameter for urpmi (yum equivalent) - --no-suggests - which inverts the behaviour (suggested packages are not considered dependencies and not installed), and this can be set permanently in urpmi's global config file, for those who prefer to keep minimal package sets. this has worked well for two or three releases now, I haven't seen any complaints about it. when urpmi lists the packages that will be installed as dependencies in a transaction, those that are suggests rather than hard requires are tagged as such, so you can notice if a transaction is introducing a large number of suggested deps you may not necessarily want, and switch to --no-suggests. I believe Debian handles things in a similar way, although it has a more complex setup (there are also Recommends, and Enhances, which is sort of Suggests pointing in the other direction. I'm not sure how those are used.) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Agenda for the 2009-05-26 Packaging Committee meeting
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 07:10:42AM +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote: soft-deps (Suggests/Recommends) is really hard to handle at the depsolver level. A depsolver need to now the hard ones, not stuff like 'it would look very nice to have pink bracelet to my little pony'. It is hard to make good decisions based on that, a asking the user every time is not a good solution IMO. You will need to take a popquiz every time you what to install a package. I can see that the information can be useful at a high level gui or in some kind of appstore. People there have bought 'foo' have also bought 'bar'. But at the lowlevel like rpm/yum is not very useful, because we don't have the needed infomation to make a good decision. There's no real difficulty here. The depsolver ignores 'suggests' for resolving dependencies. The UI needs to change to allow these to be selected, or in the case of command line tools like yum, to print them out at the end. You may also be interested in packages A, B and C. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Why not to create Fedora-us and Fedora-non-us branches?
Tom Lane, Tue, 26 May 2009 19:00:19 -0400: Unless everyone working on Fedora *moves* to the Isle of Man (and obtains citizenship there), I don't think this sort of maneuver keeps us out of trouble anyway. Realistically we all have to worry about the laws of wherever we live. So as long as a significant fraction of Fedora contributors are in $country, $country laws will matter for Fedora. (Repeat above statement for a rather long list of $country.) Of course, I was joking and I think that clicking on one link on The Site Which I Rather Won't Call By Its Name and confirming that I want to install new repository is not that big deal. Matěj -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: How to create header.info file
Seth Vidal píše v Út 26. 05. 2009 v 09:51 -0400: On Tue, 26 May 2009, Pavel Lisy wrote: Hello I've made my repository for CentOS (3/4/5) with createrepo version 0.4.9. It makes these files repodata/filelists.xml.gz repodata/other.xml.gz repodata/primary.xml.gz repodata/repomd.xml Yum is working fine but on RHEL 4 I've got this error from up2date An HTTP error occurred: URL: http://ftp-hk.tmapy.cz/tmapy-twist/centos/4/os/i386/headers/header.info Status Code: 404 Error Message: Not Found How can I create this file and other files in headers directory? There is nothing in createrepo docs about these files. 1. this is not a fedora-devel question. I know but I am not member of centos list 2. You can ask on the centos lists about this but a short answer though is - look up about yum-arch That's it. Now I see I used to use it but it was longtime ago and I forgot everything. Thank you very much, I wasn't able find this information other way (neither by Google). Pavel I will not respond to any other questions about the above on this list. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Agenda for the 2009-05-26 Packaging Committee meeting
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 07:00:07 Toshio Kuratomi wrote: Note that that would be horrible behaviour for also keeping a minimal packageset. It would be easy to add configuration options with the default being on. For keeping a minimum package set this configuration could be turned off. I don't like the proliferation of configuration options but this example seems to me that it deserves an exception to this rule. -Toshio -- José Abílio -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Removing %clean
Till Maas opensou...@till.name writes: Tom spot Callaway wrote: mkdir -p `dirname $RPM_BUILD_ROOT`\ mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT\ It prevents a race condition in case that $(dirname $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) already exists or if all directories in the path to this directory are only writable by trustworthy users. In the default configuration, this was the /var/tmp directory, where every user could create a directory, make it writable for others and sneak content into the final rpm. The two mkdirs are in reverse order though. Is that intentional? /Benny -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: dependency errors while upgrading from F10 to Rawhide (F11)
2009/5/26 Uwe Kiewel m...@kiewel-online.ch: [r...@alberta ~]# yum --enablerepo=rawhide --disablerepo=fedora update Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile YumRepo Error: All mirror URLs are not using ftp, http[s] or file. Eg. /metalink/ removing mirrorlist with no valid mirrors: //var/cache/yum/updates/mirrorlist.txt Cannot find a valid baseurl for repo: updates [r...@alberta ~]# Same here. Updating fedora-release first (the normal procedure) did not work, showing the very same error. See also bz 494054. So from f10+updates (downgraded fedora-relase back to the f10 version), I used: % yum --enablerepo=rawhide upgrade yum fedora-release and afterwards simply % yum upgrade without manually changing any of the repos files. Maybe that two-step procedure is no longer necessary when yum 3.2.23 hits f10updates. The tickets says it is now in updates-testing. - Thomas -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Agenda for the 2009-05-26 Packaging Committee meeting
On Wed, 27 May 2009, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 07:10:42AM +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote: soft-deps (Suggests/Recommends) is really hard to handle at the depsolver level. A depsolver need to now the hard ones, not stuff like 'it would look very nice to have pink bracelet to my little pony'. It is hard to make good decisions based on that, a asking the user every time is not a good solution IMO. You will need to take a popquiz every time you what to install a package. I can see that the information can be useful at a high level gui or in some kind of appstore. People there have bought 'foo' have also bought 'bar'. But at the lowlevel like rpm/yum is not very useful, because we don't have the needed infomation to make a good decision. There's no real difficulty here. The depsolver ignores 'suggests' for resolving dependencies. The UI needs to change to allow these to be selected, or in the case of command line tools like yum, to print them out at the end. You may also be interested in packages A, B and C. I think the number of disputing perspectives in this thread ALONE on how suggests would be handles proves that it is not obvious on its face how suggests should be handled. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Packaging Survey - May 2009
Hi I did a quick survey from Fedora on what software Fedora users are using that is not available in the repo. Here are the results. If you find anything interesting, feel free to pick it up. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_Survey_May_2009 Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Packaging Survey - May 2009
2009/5/27 Rahul Sundaram : Hi I did a quick survey from Fedora on what software Fedora users are using that is not available in the repo. Here are the results. If you find anything interesting, feel free to pick it up. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_Survey_May_2009 Rahul Hi I looked at Unknown Horizons and it has Creative Commons Sampling Plus 1.0 license[1] on some[2] of the sounds. I noted this in the table also added the game to the forbidden games list until upstream can replace these sounds. [1] http://www.unknown-horizons.org/site/index.php?page=licence [2] http://trac.unknown-horizons.org/browser/trunk/content/audio/sounds/SOUND_LICENSE?rev=1961 -- NV -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Packaging Survey - May 2009
On 05/27/2009 06:08 PM, Nikolay Vladimirov wrote: I looked at Unknown Horizons and it has Creative Commons Sampling Plus 1.0 license[1] on some[2] of the sounds. I noted this in the table also added the game to the forbidden games list until upstream can replace these sounds. [1] http://www.unknown-horizons.org/site/index.php?page=licence [2] http://trac.unknown-horizons.org/browser/trunk/content/audio/sounds/SOUND_LICENSE?rev=1961 Thanks for looking into this. This is a small number. We have some folks interested in sound and can provide replacements. CC'ing. Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Packaging Survey - May 2009
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 12:31:56 Rahul Sundaram wrote: Hi I did a quick survey from Fedora on what software Fedora users are using that is not available in the repo. Here are the results. If you find anything interesting, feel free to pick it up. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_Survey_May_2009 root is being reviewed (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744) Rahul -- José Abílio -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Packaging Survey - May 2009
On Wed, 27 May 2009, José Matos wrote: On Wednesday 27 May 2009 12:31:56 Rahul Sundaram wrote: Hi I did a quick survey from Fedora on what software Fedora users are using that is not available in the repo. Here are the results. If you find anything interesting, feel free to pick it up. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_Survey_May_2009 root is being reviewed (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744) I have no problem with root being packaged, it used to be no small task to package root so if it is on its way I think that's great. I just want to relate my first exposure to 'root'. I was a sysadmin in the physics dept at duke university. I was told one of the workstations in the High Energy Physics dept was running slowly and asked if I could check it out. I login and discover a process running named 'rootd'. I suspend my desire to freak out a bit and eventually trace it back to a user's homedir where they've unzipped and built a local copy of cern's root. At this point I vow a silent oath to get even with whomever named the software 'root' and go about my day. That's my story. :) -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: rawhide report: 20090523 changes
On Tue May 26 2009, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 19:12 +0200, Till Maas wrote: It is already done on the Fedorapeople server: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/FedoraPeopleConfig#polyinst antiated_tempdirs Hey, nice. That should really be an F12 feature. Here is a draft feature page for this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Polyinstantiated_Temporary_Directories Regards Till signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Fedora and the moblin2 fork
On 05/27/2009 07:13 PM, Adam Miller wrote: If you package and maintain all of those and wrote the kickstart for the spin, is there really anything else for the rest of us to do? These packages are just hacks put up together to get a live cd up and running quickly. Interested people should go through them, submit them for review, push changes upstream etc. Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Packaging Survey - May 2009
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 07:47:30PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 05/27/2009 07:41 PM, Jerry James wrote: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/cmucl Perhaps it is because CMUCL is available on 32-bit systems only, so somebody with a 64-bit system noticed that it was missing. Very likely. This is all direct feedback from fedora-list and fedoraforum.org primarily. So I guess the user was using 64-bit. I will ask him. Why isn't CMUCL available for 64-bit systems? Because no one managed to write a code generator for x86-64 and PPC yet: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=185085 Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
The future of firestarter
I recently picked up the firestarter package because it was orphaned and I know a few people who still use it. There were only a couple of small bugs opened against it so I figured I would hack at them as soon as I was able. But this morning there was a bug filed against it to port it to PolicyKit and I've run into two problems. 1) I know very little about PolicyKit other than a general overview of the purpose it serves and 2) I don't think it would really be worth doing all that work for a package that hasn't had any upstream activity in over 4 years. So my question is this, should I orphan this package such that someone else who feels the efforts wouldn't be wasted may take the time to perform the work or should I just retire the package? -Adam -- http://maxamillion.googlepages.com - () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: The future of firestarter
On 05/27/2009 07:51 PM, Adam Miller wrote: I recently picked up the firestarter package because it was orphaned and I know a few people who still use it. There were only a couple of small bugs opened against it so I figured I would hack at them as soon as I was able. But this morning there was a bug filed against it to port it to PolicyKit and I've run into two problems. 1) I know very little about PolicyKit other than a general overview of the purpose it serves and 2) I don't think it would really be worth doing all that work for a package that hasn't had any upstream activity in over 4 years. So my question is this, should I orphan this package such that someone else who feels the efforts wouldn't be wasted may take the time to perform the work or should I just retire the package? If upstream is dead and you are not going to do the work, just close the bug as WONTFIX. Yes, I filed the RFE in the first place but I wasn't aware that upstream is dead. So don't let that scare you from continuing to be the maintainer of it. Of course, if anyone is willing to do the work, that would be nice but probably not worth the effort if it is going to be a big patch. Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Packaging Survey - May 2009
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: Because no one managed to write a code generator for x86-64 and PPC yet: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=185085 Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/ Also, there are a number of places in the code where it is assumed that sizeof(void *) == sizeof(int). Note that SBCL, which is also in Fedora, is a fork of CMUCL. SBCL does work on 64-bit systems. The two are not entirely compatible, though. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: The future of firestarter
If upstream is dead and you are not going to do the work, just close the bug as WONTFIX. Yes, I filed the RFE in the first place but I wasn't aware that upstream is dead. So don't let that scare you from continuing to be the maintainer of it. Of course, if anyone is willing to do the work, that would be nice but probably not worth the effort if it is going to be a big patch. Rahul I would honestly rather retire the package than do a WONTFIX, if the project as a whole is going the direction of PolicyKit and upstream is dead then I don't want to keep old and busted cruft around the repositories as Fedora continues to look towards the future. -Adam -- http://maxamillion.googlepages.com - () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Orphaning some packages (gdhcpd, wxdfast, beagle)
Hi, I am looking for new maintainers for those packages: gdhcpd: I do not really use it, upstream has released a new version a while ago but the fedora package still is at the old version. Bugs: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/bugs/gdhcpd wxdfast: Upstream is pretty much dead (no activity for years). Bugs: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/bugs/wxdfast beagle: Package needs a lot of work and I don't really have time for it (upstream is also quite busy so there is little activity there too). Bugs: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/bugs/beagle If someone wants to take (one of) them please reply to this mail. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Online Docs group was: I must be doing something seriously wrong...
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 14:16 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote: Sorry for chiming in late, but I'm just catching up with email after being on vacation. This particular group was my brain-fart, I just wanted to have a way to easily include/exclude online help documentation (mostly to make it easy for people doing live media to leave it out). Feel free to rename if you have a more suitable idea, though. If there is another means to achieve the same purpose, I'm all ears as well. The existence of the group is fine, and it should probably grow. The problem is the name. Online at least here in the states means on the internet, so Online Docs would mean documents that your read via the Internet. Offline Docs is almost more correct but still a bit awkward. Anyway, I don't really have good suggestions. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
rawhide report: 20090527 changes
Compose started at Wed May 27 06:15:04 UTC 2009 Updated Packages: anaconda-11.5.0.56-1.fc11 - * Tue May 26 2009 Chris Lumens clum...@redhat.com - 11.5.0.55-1 - Fix blank network device descriptions in the loader. (#501757) (notting) - Make sure the right _isMigratable gets used for Ext3FS (#501585). (clumens) * Tue May 26 2009 Chris Lumens clum...@redhat.com - 11.5.0.56-1 - Ensure matching rootfs type to live type with autopart (#501876) (katzj) eggdrop-1.6.19-4.fc11 - * Tue May 26 2009 Robert Scheck rob...@fedoraproject.org 1.6.19-4 - Added upstream ctcpfix to solve CVE-2009-1789 (#502650) kernel-2.6.29.4-162.fc11 * Mon May 25 2009 Kyle McMartin k...@redhat.com 2.6.29.3-160 - kvm fixes destined for 2.6.30, rhbz#492838: kvm-Fix-PDPTR-reloading-on-CR4-writes.patch kvm-Make-paravirt-tlb-flush-also-reload-the-PAE-PDP.patch * Mon May 25 2009 Kyle McMartin k...@redhat.com 2.6.29.4-161 - Linux 2.6.29.4 - dropped patches: linux-2.6-i2c-fix-bit-algorithm-timeout.patch linux-2.6-ftdi-oops.patch linux-2.6-btrfs-fix-page-mkwrite.patch - rebased patches: linux-2.6-btrfs-unstable-update.patch, page_mkwrite fixes. * Mon May 25 2009 Kyle McMartin k...@redhat.com 2.6.29.4-162 - keys-Handle-there-being-no-fallback-destination-key.patch: fix oops at boot with autofs/krb/cifs rhbz#501588. * Fri May 22 2009 John W. Linville linvi...@redhat.com - 2.6.29.3-158 - back-port iwl3945: use cancel_delayed_work_sync to cancel rfkill_poll - modify changelog entry from Apr 13 2009 to reference correct patch * Fri May 22 2009 Kyle McMartin k...@redhat.com 2.6.29.3-159 - drm-copyback-ioctl-data-to-userspace-regardless-of-retcode.patch: Fix possible hang in drmWaitVblank. upstream 9b6fe313bfce27d4a261257da70196be0ac2bef5. * Thu May 21 2009 Kyle McMartin k...@redhat.com - 2.6.29.3-157 - mac80211-don-t-drop-nullfunc-frames-during-software.patch: upstream a9a6d05f97e6acbdeafc595e269855829751. mdadm-3.0-0.devel3.7.fc11 - * Tue May 19 2009 Doug Ledford dledf...@redhat.com - 3.0-0.devel3.7 - Only check raid devices on weekly scrubbing, don't attempt to repair them mkinitrd-6.0.86-1.fc11 -- * Thu May 21 2009 Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com - 6.0.86-1 - Reorder font initialization to properly handle KMS openoffice.org-3.1.0-11.3.fc11 -- * Mon May 25 2009 Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com - 1:3.1.0-11.3 - add in the ia64 and arm fixes for the secondary arch people - Resolves(partially): rhbz#495901 No default font-width for wmf export - ooo#101567 add Maithili locale data (some dodgy negative value and listseperator though) - Resolves: rhbz#499474 soffice and .recently-used.xbel - Resolves: ooo#102194 crash export on .doc with unused style in .toc policycoreutils-2.0.62-12.6.fc11 * Fri May 22 2009 Dan Walsh dwa...@redhat.com 2.0.62-12.6 - Add sandbox script * Tue May 12 2009 Dan Walsh dwa...@redhat.com 2.0.62-12.4 - Fix portspage and generation of init_script_file in templates * Tue May 12 2009 Dan Walsh dwa...@redhat.com 2.0.62-12.5 - More portspage fixes rhpl-0.221-1 * Tue May 26 2009 Jeremy Katz ka...@redhat.com 0.222-1 - Fix leaking fd for loadkeys with a big hammer (#501368) - Fix Russian keyboard (#492544) Summary: Added Packages: 0 Removed Packages: 0 Modified Packages: 8 Broken deps for ppc64 -- cabal2spec-0.12-1.fc11.noarch requires ghc 0:6.10.1-7 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: export policy, was Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy
On Tue, 26 May 2009, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote: | On 05/26/2009 10:09 AM, Paul Wouters wrote: | See above. Note that the Wassenaar Agreement excludes software that is | in the public domain, eg free/open source software. | | This is not correct. Public Domain has a very specific legal meaning, | and 99% of FOSS does _not_ meet it. Public Domain is when the copyright | holder has explicitly abandoned his/her/its copyright on the work and | placed it into the Public Domain. (Note: In some countries, such as | Germany, this is impossible) Tom is right about the meaning of public domain in US law. This is not the meaning in the Wassenaar Agreement. That's right, in the Wassenaar context it is (http://jya.com/wass-au.htm): in the public domain (GTN NTN GSN), as it applies herein, means technology or software which has been made available without restrictions upon its further dissemination (copyright restrictions do not remove technology or software from being in the public domain) Note that the US has various restrictions on top of the Wassenaar Agreement, but those do not apply to me (as upstream) Paul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: The future of firestarter
Adam Miller maxamillion at gmail.com writes: If upstream is dead and you are not going to do the work, just close the bug as WONTFIX. Yes, I filed the RFE in the first place but I wasn't aware that upstream is dead. So don't let that scare you from continuing dead then I don't want to keep old and busted cruft around the repositories as Fedora continues to look towards the future. -Adam Any chance of filing a set of RFEs against system-config-firewall for the features that firestarter has that system-config-firewall is still missing? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Agenda for the 2009-05-26 Packaging Committee meeting
José Matos wrote: On Wednesday 27 May 2009 17:23:33 Adam Williamson wrote: Well, yeah, I actually noted in my email that MDV's tool does exactly that (well, it doesn't show them as separate sets, it shows them in one long list with (suggests) to note the suggested ones. But doing it in sets would, I imagine, be trivial). ...and consistent with how yum currently works. Wishful thinking. :-) Why? It is easy to come with an example where those sets overlap, i.e. there is one package that only shows as (suggests) in more than one package. Sure. Why does that matter? So I am not sure if it is worth the trouble to show all the separate sets. How else are you going to display things? Specifically how are you going to display things that isn't /broken/? We have two groups right now, 'updating' and 'installing for dependencies'. Putting packages pulled in (only; directly or indirectly) by suggests: into either of those is clearly wrong. I don't see why this is hard. I do 'yum update'. It wants (with suggests: feature) to install packages for any combination of three reasons: - package is installed and is being updated - package is required by some package in transaction - package is suggested by some package in transaction (Without suggests: feature you only have first two.) Any package may belong to all three states, true. However it is placed in the group with the strongest reason for it being in the transaction. (The above are listed from strongest to weakest.) If it's installed already, set required flag and update flag. If it was required by something, set required flag iff what required it has required flag. Packages with update go in 'updating' group, with required but not update in 'installing for dependencies', everything else in 'installing for suggestions'. How hard is that, really? -- Matthew Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies. -- Sorry, but I can't look into that right now. I'm running low on sacrificial chickens. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Agenda for the 2009-05-26 Packaging Committee meeting
On 05/27/2009 12:47 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote: How hard is that, really? Whenever someone says this on the -devel list, they are automatically required to write the patch. ~spot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: I must be doing something seriously wrong...
Am Samstag, den 23.05.2009, 09:52 -0400 schrieb Josh Boyer: On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:35:58PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote: Also I've got a notion that FESCo recently approves more and more proposals without asking the community for opinions first and even in opposition to the community. I can't recall that being the case. There certainly may have been some proposals that were opened during the week that were discussed on that Friday, but we aren't creating secret proposals and voting on them. All of them come directly from contributors (usually via fedora-devel discussions) and are logged in the open fesco trac instance for the meetings. When the flags proposal was announced to fedora-devel, so so a public decision-making could take place *before* making a policy? The proposal was not announced, it's ratification nether and the policy was active for months without anybody getting informed. This is what I'd call a secret. 3. If someone really needs docs, he will realize this himself, because he is missing knowledge. For flags he doesn't. How is a deluge user supposed the realize the lack of a function? Deluge is clearly spelled out in the guideline as not needing flags for functionality. Is that statement incorrect? Please note the difference between a function and functionality. Of course the missing flags do not impact the basic function of deluge which is sharing files, but there is certain functionality missing. People can no longer see the location of their peers on a quick glance and have to read instead. I don't find that concerning. Maybe it will help literacy. Hopefully, but the original question is still unanswered then: How is a deluge user supposed the realize the lack of single a function? josh Christoph -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: I must be doing something seriously wrong...
Christoph Wickert schrieb: When the flags proposal was announced to fedora-devel, so so a public decision-making could take place *before* making a policy? The proposal was not announced, it's ratification nether and the policy was active for months without anybody getting informed. This is what I'd call a secret. Even the title of thei policy was a bad chosen, because you may thought, the the usage of compiler flags may be the topic of this policy. Hopefully, but the original question is still unanswered then: How is a deluge user supposed the realize the lack of single a function? My opinion is to drop the flag policy entirely, so the flags should be integrated into the application as planed by the upstream. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Agenda for the 2009-05-26 Packaging Committee meeting
Kevin Kofler (kevin.kof...@chello.at) said: I think the number of disputing perspectives in this thread ALONE on how suggests would be handles proves that it is not obvious on its face how suggests should be handled. Well, people are proposing 2 behaviors: 1. treat as hard dependencies by default or 2. ignore by default. Why not have both? No, there are also the ask the user always proponents. Of course... they're wrong. :) Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Packaging Survey - May 2009
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 17:01 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Hi I did a quick survey from Fedora on what software Fedora users are using that is not available in the repo. Here are the results. If you find anything interesting, feel free to pick it up. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_Survey_May_2009 as noted on the survey, I intend to package sk1 once things get a little less crazy around the f11 release :). I already maintain it for MDV, and it'd be fairly trivial to convert the spec. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Agenda for the 2009-05-26 Packaging Committee meeting
On 05/27/2009 03:07 PM, Seth Vidal wrote: but I'm sure we'll muddle through - provided this is included in upstream rpm. I think the key here is that we're waiting to deal with this particular dilemma when upstream rpm has this functionality set. ~spot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Agenda for the 2009-05-26 Packaging Committee meeting
On Wed, 27 May 2009, Tom \spot\ Callaway wrote: On 05/27/2009 03:07 PM, Seth Vidal wrote: but I'm sure we'll muddle through - provided this is included in upstream rpm. I think the key here is that we're waiting to deal with this particular dilemma when upstream rpm has this functionality set. and the last time I asked - the current patches for this feature for rpm were from suse's rpm and they were not liked, at all, by other rpm.org devs. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: I must be doing something seriously wrong...
Am Mittwoch, den 27.05.2009, 19:20 +0200 schrieb Jochen Schmitt: Christoph Wickert schrieb: When the flags proposal was announced to fedora-devel, so so a public decision-making could take place *before* making a policy? The proposal was not announced, it's ratification nether and the policy was active for months without anybody getting informed. This is what I'd call a secret. Even the title of thei policy was a bad chosen, because you may thought, the the usage of compiler flags may be the topic of this policy. Hopefully, but the original question is still unanswered then: How is a deluge user supposed the realize the lack of single a function? My opinion is to drop the flag policy entirely, so the flags should be integrated into the application as planed by the upstream. Let's not start this discussion again. ;) I'm glad FESCo did the right thing by withdrawing the policy (at least for now). Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt Regards, Christoph -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Agenda for the 2009-05-26 Packaging Committee meeting
Once upon a time, Matthew Woehlke mw_tr...@users.sourceforge.net said: ...so long as 'yum update' would tell me: updating ... installing for dependencies ... installing for suggestions ... :-) (Which I suppose it would have to, because I'm not thinking of another way to do it that wouldn't be wrong.) Don't forget: installing for dependencies for suggestions ... installing for suggestions for dependencies for suggestions ... etc :-) (yes it is meant as a joke, but it is a serious point that dependencies for suggestions should be kept separate from normal dependencies) -- Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Agenda for the 2009-05-26 Packaging Committee meeting
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 19:11 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: Seth Vidal wrote: I think the number of disputing perspectives in this thread ALONE on how suggests would be handles proves that it is not obvious on its face how suggests should be handled. Well, people are proposing 2 behaviors: 1. treat as hard dependencies by default or 2. ignore by default. Why not have both? In fact that's what Debian is doing: Recommends is 1., Suggests is 2., and of course the default can be changed (you can choose to drag everything in or to ignore even Recommends). So why don't we do the same in RPM and Yum? that sounds reasonable to me. honestly, I'd see any one of the three options as an improvement on the current situation, we shouldn't let uncertainty over which to choose hold us back from making any progress at all. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: I must be doing something seriously wrong...
Christoph Wickert schrieb: Let's not start this discussion again. ;) I'm glad FESCo did the right thing by withdrawing the policy (at least for now). You know, that the flag policy was revert on the last FESCo meeting to take futher examination about it. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Why not to create Fedora-us and Fedora-non-us branches?
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote: Bill Nottingham wrote: Peter Lemenkov (lemen...@gmail.com) said: ... what exactly are you trying to accomplish? Make it legal to ship MP3 code? Sorry, those are patented in Europe as well. Patents are *currently* illegal in Europe, (though they may be granted). The patents offices being self-funding and all that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_patents_under_the_European_Patent_Convention Article 52 Codec patents are generally not 'software patents' in the common patent-speak meaning of the words. A typical (well written) codec patent will make little or no mention of computer software. Instead they speak of specific useful transformations of information in mechanical terms as well as machine embodiments. This puts them largely outside of the domain of what is normally discussed in the content of software patents (which, have recently been written abstractly without any real reference to any machine or mechanical process). The bulk of codec patent holders are European companies (I.e. Fraunhofer, Nokia, etc). The collection of royalties for codecs is a multi-billion dollar a year industry. There are many well funded companies spending considerable amounts of money licensing codecs, even on products which they only intend to market in Europe. On that basis, I think it's safe to conclude that there is more to the situation than you are suggesting. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: The future of firestarter
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Cry cry_regar...@yahoo.com wrote: Any chance of filing a set of RFEs against system-config-firewall for the features that firestarter has that system-config-firewall is still missing? I like that idea, I've retired firestarter and will begin to file RFEs once I outline some features as well as pull the git repo and help with the development. -Adam -- http://maxamillion.googlepages.com - () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Why not to create Fedora-us and Fedora-non-us branches?
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 00:17 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: Gregory Maxwell wrote: Codec patents are generally not 'software patents' in the common patent-speak meaning of the words. But they most likely cannot be enforced against pure software. However, in some European countries (e.g. Germany), you can get in trouble for shipping things like hardware MP3 players without a license (even if the MP3 codec is implemented in software), some devices got confiscated at CeBit. Kevin Kofler Which leads to some fuzzyness, like what about a computer vendor selling PCs with Fedora preloaded? Does that constitute a hardware device? -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Why not to create Fedora-us and Fedora-non-us branches?
Gregory Maxwell wrote: On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote: Patents are *currently* illegal in Europe, (though they may be granted). The patents offices being self-funding and all that. Codec patents are generally not 'software patents' in the common patent-speak meaning of the words. Not if you ask the patent lawyers, no. The bulk of codec patent holders are European companies (I.e. Fraunhofer, Nokia, etc). The collection of royalties for codecs is a multi-billion dollar a year industry. There are many well funded companies spending considerable amounts of money licensing codecs, even on products which they only intend to market in Europe. On that basis, I think it's safe to conclude that there is more to the situation than you are suggesting. That's certainly true. None the less, Frank is right. These patents *are* illegal, if you read what the convention and the national laws actually say, and yet they are granted by routine. Whether they would hold up in court doesn't matter much apparently. They are effective anyway. Björn Persson signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Packaging Survey - May 2009
On Wed, 27 May 2009 17:01:56 +0530 Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Hi I did a quick survey from Fedora on what software Fedora users are using that is not available in the repo. Here are the results. If you find anything interesting, feel free to pick it up. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_Survey_May_2009 Rahul I can put my courier-authlib packages up for review - rpmlint only has fairly minor complaints which are easily fixed - which will in turn allow maildrop (which is already here) to build against it. Courier-imap has it's own peculiar way of self-upgrading (via sysconftool, another one of Sam's tools) which is extremely convenient for the end-user but is definitely not the Fedora way of doing things. The spec file is like a rougelike for RPM - once you go in you may never come back alive The configuration files under /usr/libexec can be moved around with symlinks but getting it in good enough shape to pass review would require some major surgery. However I'm on holidays from work at the moment so I have some spare time, I might give it a shot anyway. :-) Michael. -- Michael Fleming mflem...@thatfleminggent.com - (EMail/XMPP/Jabber) WWW: http://www.thatfleminggent.com Fedora / Red Hat Packages: http://www.thatfleminggent.com/rpm-packages Twitter: http://twitter.com/thatfleminggent -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: The future of firestarter
On 05/28/2009 02:24 AM, Adam Miller wrote: On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Cry cry_regar...@yahoo.com wrote: Any chance of filing a set of RFEs against system-config-firewall for the features that firestarter has that system-config-firewall is still missing? I like that idea, I've retired firestarter and will begin to file RFEs once I outline some features as well as pull the git repo and help with the development. Thanks Adam. Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Online Docs group was: I must be doing something seriously wrong...
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 09:05 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 15:09 +0200, Pierre-Yves wrote: There is an Online Docs group that has the -docs subpackage for many of the system-config-* packages. It uses conditionals which are painful, but would be a way for more -docs subpackages to be visible, and if the user wishes to have local documentation, if available, for the packages they've chosen, they can pick that group. The group name is a bit... wrong, but maybe a group of people that care about documentation could help come up with a better name, and help to ensure that all the available -docs packages get listed in this group. On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 14:16 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote: Feel free to rename if you have a more suitable idea, though. If there is another means to achieve the same purpose, I'm all ears as well. The existence of the group is fine, and it should probably grow. The problem is the name. Online at least here in the states means on the internet, so Online Docs would mean documents that your read via the Internet. Offline Docs is almost more correct but still a bit awkward. Anyway, I don't really have good suggestions. Suggestions: Local Documentation Local Help Documents -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: smlnj package
On 05/27/2009 07:07 PM, Ricky Zhou wrote: Hey, would anybody be interested in helping to maintain a package for smlnj (http://www.smlnj.org/)? I recently made a package for it (http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/smlnj/), but I'm not quite brave enough to take on maintaining this all by myself (especially since I haven't even started learning SML yet). Hi, I can help maintain smlnj. I'm the maintainer of mlton, an SML compiler. Once you get it into Fedora, I'll request co-maintainership. You'll want to bootstrap your package, so that you don't rely on binaries in the SRPM. I'm not exactly sure how to do it for smlnj, but it will be something like this: 1. Build with binaries in SRPM. 2. Get it into koji rawhide 3. Rebuild with BuildRequires: smlnj and with source only. Thanks, Adam signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
[Bug 502565] CVE-2006-1861 CVE-2007-2754 Multiple freetype1 vulnerabilities [Fedora rawhide]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502565 --- Comment #7 from Tomas Hoger tho...@redhat.com 2009-05-27 02:44:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) I am curious which package still uses it and why we cannot drop this old library. $ repoquery -q --whatrequires 'libttf.so.2()(64bit)' freetype1-0:1.4-0.6.pre.fc10.x86_64 freetype1-utils-0:1.4-0.6.pre.fc10.x86_64 MagicPoint-0:1.11b-7.fc10.x86_64 freetype1-devel-0:1.4-0.6.pre.fc10.x86_64 Looks like only MagicPoint now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 502565] CVE-2006-1861 CVE-2007-2754 Multiple freetype1 vulnerabilities [Fedora rawhide]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502565 --- Comment #8 from Tomas Hoger tho...@redhat.com 2009-05-27 02:46:47 EDT --- Ah, looks like Ajax already did few steps to get rid of that last dependency either: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/MagicPoint/devel/MagicPoint.spec#rev1.11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/padauk-fonts/devel dead.package,NONE,1.1
Author: mintojoseph Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/padauk-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv27139 Added Files: dead.package Log Message: Added Files: dead.package --- NEW FILE dead.package --- The padauk-fonts has been renamed to sil-padauk-fonts following: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477436 ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 468193] Chinese fonts have changed file name
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193 Qiao 29551...@qq.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #8 from Qiao 29551...@qq.com 2009-05-27 08:49:18 EDT --- Java application like Netbeans cannot display Chinese character because chinese fonts package changed file /usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttc in package cjkuni-uming-fonts have moved to /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc file /usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttc in package cjkuni-ukai-fonts have moved to /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-05-27 11:34:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: woodardworks-laconic-fonts Short Description: An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family Owners: spot Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-27 12:38:44 EDT --- woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-27 12:38:49 EDT --- woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-27 12:38:40 EDT --- woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 502565] CVE-2006-1861 CVE-2007-2754 Multiple freetype1 vulnerabilities [Fedora rawhide]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502565 --- Comment #9 from Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com 2009-05-27 13:24:24 EDT --- freetype1 is a dead package in F12. We could remove it in F11 without too much hassle but I didn't think it was worth it given how close to release we are. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel import.log, 1.3, 1.4 sil-charis-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.1, 1.2 sil-charis-fonts.spec, 1.5, 1.6
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32276/devel
Modified Files:
import.log sil-charis-fonts-fontconfig.conf
sil-charis-fonts.spec
Log Message:
prepare for charis sil compact import
Index: import.log
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.3 -r1.4
--- import.log 21 May 2009 18:11:59 - 1.3
+++ import.log 27 May 2009 19:06:00 - 1.4
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
sil-charis-fonts-4_104-6_fc11:HEAD:sil-charis-fonts-4.104-6.fc11.src.rpm:1233040224
sil-charis-fonts-4_104-7_fc11:HEAD:sil-charis-fonts-4.104-7.fc11.src.rpm:1235379642
sil-charis-fonts-4_106-1_fc12:HEAD:sil-charis-fonts-4.106-1.fc12.src.rpm:1242929489
+sil-charis-fonts-4_106-2_fc12:HEAD:sil-charis-fonts-4.106-2.fc12.src.rpm:1243451099
Index: sil-charis-fonts-fontconfig.conf
===
RCS file:
/cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel/sil-charis-fonts-fontconfig.conf,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sil-charis-fonts-fontconfig.conf27 Jan 2009 07:14:18 - 1.1
+++ sil-charis-fonts-fontconfig.conf27 May 2009 19:06:00 - 1.2
@@ -20,6 +20,12 @@
/accept
/alias
alias binding=same
+familyCharis SIL Compact/family
+accept
+ familyCharis SIL/family
+/accept
+ /alias
+ alias binding=same
familyCharis SIL Literacy/family
accept
familyCharis SIL/family
Index: sil-charis-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel/sil-charis-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.5 -r1.6
--- sil-charis-fonts.spec 21 May 2009 18:11:59 - 1.5
+++ sil-charis-fonts.spec 27 May 2009 19:06:00 - 1.6
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
Name:%{fontname}-fonts
Version: 4.106
-Release: 1%{?dist}
+Release: 2%{?dist}
Summary: A serif smart font similar to Bitstream Charter
Group: User Interface/X
@@ -70,11 +70,16 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot}
%changelog
+* Wed May 27 2009 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
+- 4.106-2
+â Propose Charis SIL as substitute to Charis SIL Compact when it's not
available
+
* Fri May 21 2009 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
- 4.106-1
â This version supports Unicode 5.1 and adds support for Small capitals
-* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 4.104-8
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
+- 4.104-8
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/sil-charis-fonts/F-11 .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 import.log, 1.2, 1.3 sil-charis-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.1, 1.2 sil-charis-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5 sources, 1.2, 1.3
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1143/F-11
Modified Files:
.cvsignore import.log sil-charis-fonts-fontconfig.conf
sil-charis-fonts.spec sources
Log Message:
prepare for charis sil compact import
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/F-11/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3
--- .cvsignore 27 Jan 2009 07:14:18 - 1.2
+++ .cvsignore 27 May 2009 19:10:20 - 1.3
@@ -1 +1 @@
-CharisSIL4.104.zip
+CharisSIL4.106.zip
Index: import.log
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/F-11/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3
--- import.log 23 Feb 2009 09:01:05 - 1.2
+++ import.log 27 May 2009 19:10:20 - 1.3
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
sil-charis-fonts-4_104-6_fc11:HEAD:sil-charis-fonts-4.104-6.fc11.src.rpm:1233040224
sil-charis-fonts-4_104-7_fc11:HEAD:sil-charis-fonts-4.104-7.fc11.src.rpm:1235379642
+sil-charis-fonts-4_106-2_fc12:F-11:sil-charis-fonts-4.106-2.fc12.src.rpm:1243451246
Index: sil-charis-fonts-fontconfig.conf
===
RCS file:
/cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/F-11/sil-charis-fonts-fontconfig.conf,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sil-charis-fonts-fontconfig.conf27 Jan 2009 07:14:18 - 1.1
+++ sil-charis-fonts-fontconfig.conf27 May 2009 19:10:20 - 1.2
@@ -20,6 +20,12 @@
/accept
/alias
alias binding=same
+familyCharis SIL Compact/family
+accept
+ familyCharis SIL/family
+/accept
+ /alias
+ alias binding=same
familyCharis SIL Literacy/family
accept
familyCharis SIL/family
Index: sil-charis-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/F-11/sil-charis-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -p -r1.4 -r1.5
--- sil-charis-fonts.spec 26 Feb 2009 00:59:58 - 1.4
+++ sil-charis-fonts.spec 27 May 2009 19:10:20 - 1.5
@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@
%global archivename CharisSIL
Name:%{fontname}-fonts
-Version: 4.104
-Release: 8%{?dist}
+Version: 4.106
+Release: 2%{?dist}
Summary: A serif smart font similar to Bitstream Charter
Group: User Interface/X
@@ -66,11 +66,20 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot}
%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf
-%doc *.txt *.pdf
+%doc *.txt
%changelog
-* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 4.104-8
+* Wed May 27 2009 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
+- 4.106-2
+â Propose Charis SIL as substitute to Charis SIL Compact when it's not
available
+
+* Fri May 21 2009 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
+- 4.106-1
+â This version supports Unicode 5.1 and adds support for Small capitals
+
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
+- 4.104-8
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/F-11/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3
--- sources 27 Jan 2009 07:14:18 - 1.2
+++ sources 27 May 2009 19:10:20 - 1.3
@@ -1 +1 @@
-acc153c243b90e3e5d0bb53476ab894e CharisSIL4.104.zip
+045aea5116c6c20e5b84e165d9727f0c CharisSIL4.106.zip
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/sil-charis-compact-fonts/F-11 import.log, NONE, 1.1 sil-charis-compact-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 sil-charis-compact-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-compact-fonts/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1854/F-11
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log sil-charis-compact-fonts-fontconfig.conf
sil-charis-compact-fonts.spec
Log Message:
initial import
--- NEW FILE import.log ---
sil-charis-compact-fonts-4_106-1_fc12:F-11:sil-charis-compact-fonts-4.106-1.fc12.src.rpm:1243451470
--- NEW FILE sil-charis-compact-fonts-fontconfig.conf ---
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM ../fonts.dtd
fontconfig
alias
familyserif/family
prefer
familyCharis SIL Compact/family
/prefer
/alias
alias
familyCharis SIL Compact/family
default
familyserif/family
/default
/alias
alias binding=same
familyBitstream Charter/family
accept
familyCharis SIL Compact/family
/accept
/alias
alias binding=same
familyCharis SIL/family
accept
familyCharis SIL Compact/family
/accept
/alias
alias binding=same
familyCharis SIL Literacy/family
accept
familyCharis SIL Compact/family
/accept
/alias
/fontconfig
--- NEW FILE sil-charis-compact-fonts.spec ---
%global fontname sil-charis-compact
%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
%global archivename CharisSILCompact
Name:%{fontname}-fonts
Version: 4.106
Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: A version of Charis SIL with tighter line spacing
Group: User Interface/X
License: OFL
URL: http://scripts.sil.org/CharisSILFont
# Actual download URL
#
http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/render_download.php?site_id=nrsiformat=filemedia_id=%{archivename}.zipfilename=%{archivename}%{version}.zip
Source0: %{archivename}%{version}.zip
Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf
BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XX)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel
Requires: fontpackages-filesystem
%description
Charis SIL provides glyphs for a wide range of Latin and Cyrillic characters.
Charis is similar to Bitstream Charter, one of the first fonts designed
specifically for laser printers. It is highly readable and holds up well in
less-than-ideal reproduction environments. It also has a full set of styles
â regular, italic, bold, bold italic â and so is more useful in general
publishing than Doulos SIL. Charis is a serif proportionally spaced font
optimized for readability in long printed documents.
The Charis SIL Compact fonts were derived from Charis SIL using SIL TypeTuner,
by setting the âLine spacingâ feature to âTightâ, and they cannot be
TypeTuned
again. They may exhibit some diacritics clipping on screen (but should print
fine).
%prep
%setup -q -n %{archivename}
for txt in *.txt ; do
fold -s $txt $txt.new
sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new
touch -r $txt $txt.new
mv $txt.new $txt
done
%build
%install
rm -fr %{buildroot}
install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}
ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf}
%clean
rm -fr %{buildroot}
%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf
%doc *.txt
%changelog
* Sat May 23 2009 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
- 4.106-1
â Initial release
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-compact-fonts/F-11/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore 26 May 2009 22:29:34 - 1.1
+++ .cvsignore 27 May 2009 19:11:41 - 1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+CharisSILCompact4.106.zip
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-compact-fonts/F-11/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources 26 May 2009 22:29:34 - 1.1
+++ sources 27 May 2009 19:11:41 - 1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+d48c3a1c191891f0347764d1a005b7a3 CharisSILCompact4.106.zip
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/sil-charis-compact-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 sil-charis-compact-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 sil-charis-compact-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-compact-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1263/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log sil-charis-compact-fonts-fontconfig.conf
sil-charis-compact-fonts.spec
Log Message:
initial import
--- NEW FILE import.log ---
sil-charis-compact-fonts-4_106-1_fc12:HEAD:sil-charis-compact-fonts-4.106-1.fc12.src.rpm:1243451404
--- NEW FILE sil-charis-compact-fonts-fontconfig.conf ---
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM ../fonts.dtd
fontconfig
alias
familyserif/family
prefer
familyCharis SIL Compact/family
/prefer
/alias
alias
familyCharis SIL Compact/family
default
familyserif/family
/default
/alias
alias binding=same
familyBitstream Charter/family
accept
familyCharis SIL Compact/family
/accept
/alias
alias binding=same
familyCharis SIL/family
accept
familyCharis SIL Compact/family
/accept
/alias
alias binding=same
familyCharis SIL Literacy/family
accept
familyCharis SIL Compact/family
/accept
/alias
/fontconfig
--- NEW FILE sil-charis-compact-fonts.spec ---
%global fontname sil-charis-compact
%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
%global archivename CharisSILCompact
Name:%{fontname}-fonts
Version: 4.106
Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: A version of Charis SIL with tighter line spacing
Group: User Interface/X
License: OFL
URL: http://scripts.sil.org/CharisSILFont
# Actual download URL
#
http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/render_download.php?site_id=nrsiformat=filemedia_id=%{archivename}.zipfilename=%{archivename}%{version}.zip
Source0: %{archivename}%{version}.zip
Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf
BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XX)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel
Requires: fontpackages-filesystem
%description
Charis SIL provides glyphs for a wide range of Latin and Cyrillic characters.
Charis is similar to Bitstream Charter, one of the first fonts designed
specifically for laser printers. It is highly readable and holds up well in
less-than-ideal reproduction environments. It also has a full set of styles
â regular, italic, bold, bold italic â and so is more useful in general
publishing than Doulos SIL. Charis is a serif proportionally spaced font
optimized for readability in long printed documents.
The Charis SIL Compact fonts were derived from Charis SIL using SIL TypeTuner,
by setting the âLine spacingâ feature to âTightâ, and they cannot be
TypeTuned
again. They may exhibit some diacritics clipping on screen (but should print
fine).
%prep
%setup -q -n %{archivename}
for txt in *.txt ; do
fold -s $txt $txt.new
sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new
touch -r $txt $txt.new
mv $txt.new $txt
done
%build
%install
rm -fr %{buildroot}
install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}
ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf}
%clean
rm -fr %{buildroot}
%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf
%doc *.txt
%changelog
* Sat May 23 2009 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
- 4.106-1
â Initial release
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-compact-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore 26 May 2009 22:29:34 - 1.1
+++ .cvsignore 27 May 2009 19:10:45 - 1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+CharisSILCompact4.106.zip
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-compact-fonts/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources 26 May 2009 22:29:34 - 1.1
+++ sources 27 May 2009 19:10:45 - 1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+d48c3a1c191891f0347764d1a005b7a3 CharisSILCompact4.106.zip
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 502307] Review Request:sil-charis-compact-fonts - A version of Charis SIL with tighter line spacing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502307 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-05-27 15:21:53 EDT --- Pushed. Thanks everyone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 502307] Review Request:sil-charis-compact-fonts - A version of Charis SIL with tighter line spacing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502307 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-27 15:24:20 EDT --- sil-charis-fonts-4.106-2.fc11,sil-charis-compact-fonts-4.106-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sil-charis-fonts-4.106-2.fc11,sil-charis-compact-fonts-4.106-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 444559] [ml_IN] Wrong shape for conjuncts formed using 0D30 (xRa) in a word
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444559 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-05-27 18:40:51 EDT --- Closing - please reopen if there should still be any problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 402331] [ml_IN] Wrong combinations used for conjunct ' ന്റ '
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=402331 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #21 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-05-27 18:40:48 EDT --- Closing - please reopen if there should still be any problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 444563] [ml_IN] When 0D2F is combined with a consonant and followed by 0D15, 0D2F joins with 0D15
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444563 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-05-27 18:40:53 EDT --- Closing - please reopen if there should still be any problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 402321] [ml_IN] Wrong combinations used for the conjunct ' ന്പ '
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=402321 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-05-27 18:40:46 EDT --- Closing - please reopen if there should still be any problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 431029] [ml_IN] Wrong combinations used for conjunct ' ന്റ '
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431029 Bug 431029 depends on bug 402331, which changed state. Bug 402331 Summary: [ml_IN] Wrong combinations used for conjunct 'ന്റ' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=402331 What|Old Value |New Value Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Change Freeze
I'd like to clean up some old plague cruft on ppc2 (which has started throwing storage warnings) rm -rf /mnt/build/builder_work/* +1's? -Mike ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Change Freeze
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 04:38:13 pm Mike McGrath wrote: I'd like to clean up some old plague cruft on ppc2 (which has started throwing storage warnings) rm -rf /mnt/build/builder_work/* +1's? +1 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: My Introduction
On Tue, 26 May 2009, Sijis Aviles wrote: Hey all. My name is Sijis Aviles and I'm a Systems Engineer living in Chicago, IL. I've been using linux for about 5 years now, and became an RHCE about a 1 1/2 years ago. I started with Debian and then moved to Fedora during the F7 release. My experiences are primarily with scripting and web technologies: PHP, Batch, VB, Bash, HTML/CSS and some Perl, C/C++. I'm currently learning Python. I love to learn and figure out how things work. Challenges are always fun and I'm not afraid to ask questions or for help. I think I'd like to participate with the web, noc or tools FIGs. I hope I can be of help and continue the Fedora tradition. Sijis Welcome Sijis! How much time / week are you interested in participating? Also have you seen - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/GettingStarted -Mike ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Change Freeze
On 2009-05-27 04:41:27 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: On Wednesday 27 May 2009 04:38:13 pm Mike McGrath wrote: I'd like to clean up some old plague cruft on ppc2 (which has started throwing storage warnings) rm -rf /mnt/build/builder_work/* +1's? +1 +1 (and strangely, I still haven't gotten the original email). Thanks, Ricky pgp5tNDBNEdk4.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Redirect needed for docs.fp.o
Could I ask someone to set up a rewrite rule or a redirect that would send people from: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f11preview to: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f11 And from: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f10preview to: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f10 I'm not the expert but I think what we need is a rewrite, since there are a ton of subdirectories and files under there. The /f10 content is pre-existing, and essentially we're just sending people away from preview content to the final content. In the /f11 case it's the same, but I've copied the preview content and the Docs team will simply replace the preview content with the final content shortly for release day. We're doing this because QA noted, wisely, that the way things stand right now, they have to change some links in a release-day rain dance to make sure people are looking at the right content. Better that the link always point to a single location and that the content update. Our Docs crew is relatively new at this and out of an abundance of caution they chose to keep the preview docs separated. In the future everyone agreed there should be a procedure of treating these directories like branches, with no need for 'f12beta' or 'f12preview'. Eric Christensen will file a ticket to support this request, as soon as I get the CVS stuff done to support it. Did I mention how hard it is to use CVS now that I use git regularly? ;-) -- Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
[PATCH] Add requested redirects for release notes.
--- .../web/docs.fedoraproject.org/amodRewrite.conf|2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/configs/web/docs.fedoraproject.org/amodRewrite.conf b/configs/web/docs.fedoraproject.org/amodRewrite.conf index 6ca8ac5..55add46 100644 --- a/configs/web/docs.fedoraproject.org/amodRewrite.conf +++ b/configs/web/docs.fedoraproject.org/amodRewrite.conf @@ -2,3 +2,5 @@ RewriteEngine On RedirectMatch ^/$ http://docs.fedoraproject.org/docs/ RewriteRule ^(.*)/fc7/$ http://docs.fedoraproject.org/$1/f7/ [R,L] RewriteRule ^(.*)/fc7$ http://docs.fedoraproject.org/$1/f7/ [R,L] +Redirect /release-notes/f11preview /release-notes/f11 +Redirect /release-notes/f10preview /release-notes/f10 -- 1.5.5.6 pgpiAZjeIkLYQ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: My Introduction
Hi Mike, I anticipate being available ~10hr/week. I have read through that document. I created a Fedora Account (ID: sijis) a few days ago and i've been lurking in #fedora-admin too. I'm just observing and getting acquainted on what's going on. I plan on attending the meeting on Thursday afternoon. See you all there. Sijis On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, 26 May 2009, Sijis Aviles wrote: Hey all. My name is Sijis Aviles and I'm a Systems Engineer living in Chicago, IL. I've been using linux for about 5 years now, and became an RHCE about a 1 1/2 years ago. I started with Debian and then moved to Fedora during the F7 release. My experiences are primarily with scripting and web technologies: PHP, Batch, VB, Bash, HTML/CSS and some Perl, C/C++. I'm currently learning Python. I love to learn and figure out how things work. Challenges are always fun and I'm not afraid to ask questions or for help. I think I'd like to participate with the web, noc or tools FIGs. I hope I can be of help and continue the Fedora tradition. Sijis Welcome Sijis! How much time / week are you interested in participating? Also have you seen - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/GettingStarted -Mike ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: What software is missing in the Fedora repository?
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 19:57 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 16:31 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Tell me the home page of the software and give me a brief description on what it does. A couple of video transcoder GUIs which look interesting. See http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/333904/1e8930cff396a065/ for an overview. 1) Arista: http://programmer-art.org/projects/arista-transcoder 2) Transmageddon: http://www.linuxrising.org/transmageddon/ Staying on the theme of video software, I'd love to see Kdenlive in the Fedora repo. I've been wanting to try it out ever since I heard about it. http://www.kdenlive.org/ Kdenlive is a free open-source video editor for GNU/Linux and FreeBSD, which supports DV, AVCHD (experimental support) and HDV editing. Kdenlive relies on several other open source projects, such as FFmpeg and MLT video framework. Our software was designed to answer all needs, from basic video editing to semi-professionnal work. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.21-170.2.56.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 02:01:38 up 3 days, 3:12, 3 users, load average: 0.09, 0.31, 0.20 -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: What software is missing in the Fedora repository?
Am Mittwoch, den 27.05.2009, 02:04 -0400 schrieb Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu: On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 19:57 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 16:31 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Tell me the home page of the software and give me a brief description on what it does. A couple of video transcoder GUIs which look interesting. See http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/333904/1e8930cff396a065/ for an overview. 1) Arista: http://programmer-art.org/projects/arista-transcoder 2) Transmageddon: http://www.linuxrising.org/transmageddon/ Staying on the theme of video software, I'd love to see Kdenlive in the Fedora repo. I've been wanting to try it out ever since I heard about it. http://www.kdenlive.org/ Kdenlive is a free open-source video editor for GNU/Linux and FreeBSD, which supports DV, AVCHD (experimental support) and HDV editing. Kdenlive relies on several other open source projects, such as FFmpeg and MLT video framework. Our software was designed to answer all needs, from basic video editing to semi-professionnal work. Regards, Ranbir As Rahul already stated, it is going to be in RPM Fusion https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=529 Henry -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.21-170.2.56.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 02:01:38 up 3 days, 3:12, 3 users, load average: 0.09, 0.31, 0.20 -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: hardware for fedora
2009/5/26 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at: Sharpe, Sam J wrote: I happen to have mine with an NVidia NVS290, but the built in Intel GMA3100 seems to work well too. It actually works better as it doesn't need proprietary third-party drivers. The GMA3100 just works out of the box. NVidia is a PITA. We'll have to agree to disagree on that. I don't find it a PITA (I have akmod-nvidia installed) and the 3D performance of the Intel chipset is not great enough to satisfy the applications that some of my users run. I appreciate the point that Intel is much more open in it's driver development and I wish NVidia were the same, but they're not and I decided to sacrifice a little freedom for a lot of performance. -- Sam -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: What software is missing in the Fedora repository?
On 05/22/2009 05:57 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 16:31 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Tell me the home page of the software and give me a brief description on what it does. A couple of video transcoder GUIs which look interesting. See http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/333904/1e8930cff396a065/ for an overview. 1) Arista: http://programmer-art.org/projects/arista-transcoder An easy to use multimedia transcoder for the GNOME Desktop. Arista focuses on being easy to use by making the complex task of encoding for various devices simple. Pick your input, pick your target device, choose a file to save to and go. 2) Transmageddon: http://www.linuxrising.org/transmageddon/ I have submitted Arista for review at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502477 Transmageddon requires a new release of pyobject2 with a fix that I am waiting for. In communication with upstream about this. Rahul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: What software is missing in the Fedora repository?
One other program that I use regularly and install on everything is this: http://gtapecalc.sourceforge.net/ http://www.mailinglistarchive.com/fedora-list@redhat.com/msg108188.html -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Enlightenment and NetworkManager
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 3:16 AM, jack wallen jlwal...@monkeypantz.net wrote: Valent Turkovic wrote: On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 4:27 PM, jack wallen jlwal...@monkeypantz.net wrote: Valent Turkovic wrote: On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 2:31 PM, jack wallen jlwal...@monkeypantz.net wrote: Valent Turkovic wrote: Now are you using nm-applet in enlightenment? I have started nm-applet in xterm window but don't see it anywhere in enlightenment, strange. you won't actually see it show up. if you've already configured nm-applet in GNOME all you need to do is issue the command: nm-applet from the command line. it should pick up an ip address from your wireless. issue something like: ping yahoo.com to test it. if it doesn't work right away i will issue the nm-applet command a second time. now to make this easy i add an entry to the E16 menu that looks like this: Wireless NULL exec nm-applet that menu entry will go in ~/.e16/menus/user_apps.menu save that and give it a try. hope that helps. jack I told you wrong info, I'm running E17 on Fedora 10 - the package is called enligtenment and current version is 0.16 and that confused me, and also there are also E16 packages available in Fedora 10 repos... really confusing. At home I could probably use nm-applet trick to make wireless work, but how to make wired networking work with static IP addresses - not with DHCP? At work we have static IP addresses so nm-applet trick doesn't work. For Elightenment to work as normal desktop I see two major issues: - network manager integration (or wicd integration) - usb stick automatic mounting do you have any suggestions how to make this work? You should be able to configure both in GNOME with nm-applet. Once those are configured running nm-applet in E17 should detect which you are using. At least in theory it should. or you could manually configure both interfaces and then use the ifup command to bring them up. you would use something like: ifup eth0 or ifup wlan0 you could configure both interfaces in /etc/network/interfaces I sometimes use wireless, some times wired network with dhcp and sometimes static IP addresses, and here nm-applet would work for all but for last scenario (static IP addresses). There is a module called systray for E17, it looks like it is really new and Ubuntu guys packaged it but it hasn't landed in Fedora yet. This module would let NetworkManager work in E17. -- http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/ linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org. ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
I'm looking for Fedora+Asterisk+Jabber+Ldap+MUA+Imap+Samba HOW-TO
Someone can point me to some HOW-TO for setup a all-in-one Fedora/Centos Server with this application: * AUTH via Ldap * Jabber for IM * Asterisk for VOIP * Mail server for send mail * IMAP server for Store and read E-Mail * Samba Server for PDC * A Groupware for Share Calendar * Address Book I have see witch all this application are stored in Fedora Repo, but my question is: How To integrate and configure everything together ? Thanks for help. -- Dario Lesca d.le...@solinos.it -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: hardware for fedora
Around 07:33am on Wednesday, May 27, 2009 (UK time), Sharpe, Sam J scrawled: I don't find it a PITA (I have akmod-nvidia installed) and the 3D performance of the Intel chipset is not great enough to satisfy the applications that some of my users run. Out of interest, what applications? Steve -- Play Champions - my free football predictions game at: http://www.stevesearle.com/champs/about.html 11:31:03 up 17 days, 21:55, 1 user, load average: 0.11, 0.19, 0.09 pgpq1nCbozcXV.pgp Description: PGP signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: What software is missing in the Fedora repository?
On 05/21/2009 12:53 PM, Giuseppe Fuggiano wrote: Rahul Sundaram wrote: Hi, I am doing a quick survey for software that you use on a regular basis that is not available via the Fedora repository. Software that you suggest should be free and open source, free of patent and other legal issues. Tell me the home page of the software and give me a brief description on what it does. Bonus points if you can see in Google for software-name fedora package review to figure it if it is already in the Fedora package review queue. If you know of RPM packages in other distributions for the software your are suggesting, that information is useful as well. Name: OpenAFS Home page: http://www.openafs.org/ Can't go in as it requires a third party kernel module with a different license. Rahul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: emacs c++ code completion help
Hello, Can anyone tell how to get the C++ auto code completion in emacs? How to get the list of funcions of a class after typing dot (.) and arrow (-) ? I followed this link but it is not working after typing dot (.). http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/AutoComplete#toc2 -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: I'm looking for Fedora+Asterisk+Jabber+Ldap+MUA+Imap+Samba HOW-TO
Dear Dario, I too is looking for the perfect how to for all the said application, there are lots of how to but none of them is complete and updated ... Arun On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Dario Lesca d.le...@solinos.it wrote: Someone can point me to some HOW-TO for setup a all-in-one Fedora/Centos Server with this application: * AUTH via Ldap * Jabber for IM * Asterisk for VOIP * Mail server for send mail * IMAP server for Store and read E-Mail * Samba Server for PDC * A Groupware for Share Calendar * Address Book I have see witch all this application are stored in Fedora Repo, but my question is: How To integrate and configure everything together ? Thanks for help. -- Dario Lesca d.le...@solinos.it -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: hardware for fedora
Steve Searle wrote: Around 07:33am on Wednesday, May 27, 2009 (UK time), Sharpe, Sam J scrawled: I don't find it a PITA (I have akmod-nvidia installed) and the 3D performance of the Intel chipset is not great enough to satisfy the applications that some of my users run. Out of interest, what applications? Mainly high end engineering stuff, like: ABAQUS: http://www.simulia.com/ STAR-CD: http://www.cd-adapco.com/ It's not so much actually running the analysis, as that's CPU-bound (although I hear some of the newer software will take advantage of GPU processing) - it's the subsequent loading and viewing of the resulting outputs, which are typically OpenGL overlays of data on top of a 3d representation of whatever they are modelling (I'm an Electronic Engineer, I don't really understand what these Mech/Aero guys do ;o) Same goes for some of the stuff the Chemistry department use to simulate and view molecules, spinning them in pretty ways takes a lot of GPU power. Also, the users are really really picky - they don't like the GPU stealing 128MB of their 4GB main memory (which is what the GMA3100 in the models we buy does) - they'd rather have the extra 0.125GB to fiddle with the models and spend the extra few bucks on a discrete graphics card. (I work at a University - so it's not your average software user-base) -- Sam -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: I'm looking for Fedora+Asterisk+Jabber+Ldap+MUA+Imap+Samba HOW-TO
Arun Shrimali wrote: Dear Dario, I too is looking for the perfect how to for all the said application, there are lots of how to but none of them is complete and updated ... Arun On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Dario Lesca d.le...@solinos.it wrote: Someone can point me to some HOW-TO for setup a all-in-one Fedora/Centos Server with this application: * AUTH via Ldap * Jabber for IM * Asterisk for VOIP * Mail server for send mail * IMAP server for Store and read E-Mail * Samba Server for PDC * A Groupware for Share Calendar * Address Book Maybe compile ebox from source: http://ebox-platform.com/ Frank -- msn: frankly3d skype: frankly3d Mailing-List Reply to: Mailing-List Still Learning, Unicode where possible -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Packaging Survey - May 2009
Hi I put up all the suggested packages from different sources and their status at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_Survey_May_2009 Thanks for all your feedback. If you find anything more, feel free to drop me a mail. Rahul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Packaging Survey - May 2009
2009/5/27 Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org: Hi I put up all the suggested packages from different sources and their status at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_Survey_May_2009 Thanks for all your feedback. If you find anything more, feel free to drop me a mail. Why not combine this info with https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList J. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Packaging Survey - May 2009
On 05/27/2009 05:07 PM, Jonathan Underwood wrote: Why not combine this info with https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList It is cross referenced and categorized appropriately. I have kept them separate so as to show progress and focus on this list. Rahul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
help
Hi I'm using fedora core 5 i'm not able to install mozilla firefox tarball to get latest version,Unable to play movies in totem media player it's showing error that it needs a decoder,unable to use openoffice it says it needs jre even though i installed it help me i can't use earlier versions because i have less graphics memory -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: F9 /usr/bin/java is not owned by any package - huh?
David wrote: On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Clint Dilks cli...@scms.waikato.ac.nz wrote: David wrote: Newbie question: I'm surprised by the rpm -qf response: file /usr/bin/java is not owned by any package below. This is most likely because you are using the alternatives system with Java. I hope this helps :) Perfectly correct and clear, thank you. I never heard of alternatives before, but 'man alternatives' explains it. For what it's worth, we're currently working on packaging guidelines for alternatives, which makes their targets be owned properly. -- Rex -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Packaging Survey - May 2009
On 05/27/2009 06:53 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 17:03:06 +0530, wrote: Thanks for all your feedback. If you find anything more, feel free to drop me a mail. The list doesn't include any of the DJB stuff, such as qmail, djbdns, daemontools, and ucspi-tcp. Related is ezmlm-idx which is a qmail dependent list server that is an extension of ezmlm mostly maintained by Bruce Guenter these days. Can you add these to the wiki? Rahul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Can't get updates
I'm having great problem after upgrading F9 to F10 (using an install dvd). I get huge numbers of updates downloaded, but then it fails. The problem appears to be related to my updates repo. I've tried it with both baseurl and mirrors, without success. Errors I've seen include Could not retrieve mirrorlist http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=updates-released- f10arch=i386 error was [Errno 4] IOError: urlopen error (-2, 'Name or service not known') Error: Cannot find a valid baseurl for repo: updates Trying other mirror. http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/10/i386/xsane- gimp-0.996-3.fc10.i386.rpm: [Errno 4] IOError: urlopen error (-2, 'Name or service not known') Trying other mirror. My updates repo says: [updates] name=Fedora $releasever - $basearch - Updates failovermethod=priority #baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/$releasever/$basearch/ mirrorlist=http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=updates-released- f$releaseverarch=$basearch enabled=1 gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-$basearch [updates-debuginfo] name=Fedora $releasever - $basearch - Updates - Debug failovermethod=priority baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/$releasever/$basearch/debug/ #mirrorlist=http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=updates-released- debug-f$releaseverarch=$basearch enabled=0 gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-$basearch [updates-source] name=Fedora $releasever - Updates Source failovermethod=priority baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/$releasever/SRPMS/ #mirrorlist=http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=updates-released- source-f$releaseverarch=$basearch enabled=0 gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-$basearch Can someone point me to the problem and solution? Thanks Anne signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: I'm looking for Fedora+Asterisk+Jabber+Ldap+MUA+Imap+Samba HOW-TO
Il giorno mer, 27/05/2009 alle 12.30 +0100, Frank Murphy (Frankly3d) ha scritto: Maybe compile ebox from source: http://ebox-platform.com/ Ok, thanks, this seem a good project. But is based on (and binary is for) Ubuntu. Nothing for Fedora? Thanks -- Dario Lesca d.le...@solinos.it -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Can't get updates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Anne Wilson a écrit : I'm having great problem after upgrading F9 to F10 (using an install dvd). I get huge numbers of updates downloaded, but then it fails. Did you, before all update yum: yum update yum Then, after, yum update - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Université Paris Descartes Tél. +33 (0)1 4286 2145 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkodSX8ACgkQdE6C2dhV2JXF3QCeMEXL2GRiRo/2LobF4zJ9JqS7 780AmQF+NVp6ZDYcbvAr4jbavxh3UUY5 =poZ9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: I'm looking for Fedora+Asterisk+Jabber+Ldap+MUA+Imap+Samba HOW-TO
Dario Lesca wrote: Il giorno mer, 27/05/2009 alle 12.30 +0100, Frank Murphy (Frankly3d) ha scritto: Maybe compile ebox from source: http://ebox-platform.com/ Ok, thanks, this seem a good project. But is based on (and binary is for) Ubuntu. Nothing for Fedora? Thanks At the moment No. Though it is included in Rahuls feedback wiki: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_Survey_May_2009 Hopefully it will be picked up, as I'm not in apostition skill wise to package yet. Frank -- msn: frankly3d skype: frankly3d Mailing-List Reply to: Mailing-List Still Learning, Unicode where possible -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Can't get updates
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 15:09:03 François Patte wrote: Anne Wilson a écrit : I'm having great problem after upgrading F9 to F10 (using an install dvd). I get huge numbers of updates downloaded, but then it fails. Did you, before all update yum: yum update yum I forgot that - but I can't: Downloading Packages: http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/testing/10/i386/yum-3.2.23-3.fc10.noarch.rpm: [Errno 4] IOError: urlopen error (-2, 'Name or service not known') Trying other mirror. Error Downloading Packages: yum-3.2.23-3.fc10.noarch: failure: yum-3.2.23-3.fc10.noarch.rpm from updates-testing: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. Anne signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Can't get updates
Anne Wilson wrote: On Wednesday 27 May 2009 15:09:03 François Patte wrote: Anne Wilson a écrit : I'm having great problem after upgrading F9 to F10 (using an install dvd). I get huge numbers of updates downloaded, but then it fails. Did you, before all update yum: yum update yum I forgot that - but I can't: Downloading Packages: http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/testing/10/i386/yum-3.2.23-3.fc10.noarch.rpm: [Errno 4] IOError: urlopen error (-2, 'Name or service not known') Trying other mirror. Error Downloading Packages: yum-3.2.23-3.fc10.noarch: failure: yum-3.2.23-3.fc10.noarch.rpm from updates-testing: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. download the rpm and do yum localinstall or rpm -Uvh Frank -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Can't get updates
2009/5/27 Anne Wilson an...@kde.org: On Wednesday 27 May 2009 15:09:03 François Patte wrote: Anne Wilson a écrit : I'm having great problem after upgrading F9 to F10 (using an install dvd). I get huge numbers of updates downloaded, but then it fails. Did you, before all update yum: yum update yum I forgot that - but I can't: Downloading Packages: http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/testing/10/i386/yum-3.2.23-3.fc10.noarch.rpm: [Errno 4] IOError: urlopen error (-2, 'Name or service not known') Trying other mirror. Error Downloading Packages: yum-3.2.23-3.fc10.noarch: failure: yum-3.2.23-3.fc10.noarch.rpm from updates-testing: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. Anne -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines Anne, can you download the yum rpm directly and save on your hard disk??? then by rpm command you should be able to install it... -- Antonio Montagnani Skype : antoniomontag SIP: antoniomon...@ekiga.net -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
